WGMG: Water getting in the mailbox soaking the mail.

WGMG: We got our year 10 jumpers, and we had names printed on the back, mine says 'Marx' and no one knows what its suppossed to be. :evil:

This is probably a sign that your attempt at communist propaganda is stupid.

well it was also a reference to the marx brothers.
But no one knows who they are either :(

WGMG: loss of motivation for gym.

Should have gone with "Groucho".

:o Oh noes! How will everyone know how vascular you are now?!

Chico/Harpo combination FTW!!! :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

WGMG: this forum. Same 20 people. Same posts. Same threads. Same shit every day of the week. Why do we all come here for this?

I come for the Who's Hot thread and your trolling

Says the bloke who was banned for life, and yet still came crawling back.

Fixed for accuracy.

If you don't like it, you know the drill bonkers.

Chirpo?

#-o #-o

Where there was one...there was the other.
Great comedy duo :cool: :lol:

Entertain us then.

This is just going to end with penises everywhere.

I don't think he's stupid enough to get himself banned again so quickly.

It was pure foolhardy belligerence that got him banned in the first place.

I might have missed something.
but please fill me in?
What did he get banned for and how is he still here?

Actually, can we not air dirty laundry for a change and move along?

No, wash the dirty laundry and hang it out to dry.
Then make me a sandwhich.

I'm not your mother.

You might be for all i know :shock:
Alternatively you could tell the story

Our Leavers jackets were much worse. A girl asked for Katie and got Katle instead. Another guy wanted Harpie (his last name is harp) and got Haspie
WGMG: Holiday Homework

Or (get this!) you could just look through old posts in the archives to find out what you want to know because this story has been told to death.

Yeah, but im lazy.

WGMG: Engineering Foundations: Design and Processes. Biggest load of bullshit ever.

Willful belligerence does nothing for your credibility.

So, essentially, Architecture? :lol:

Haha, it's for all branches of engineering so not quite. But almost.... :p

We have three people who "teach" us in this subject. A lecturer, a technical tutor and a communications tutor. Every week we get told how to do the same three different ways and if we don't do it how they want we get marked down for their component. We even get told conflicting things by the same person!

Take our latest assignment [report], my group asked the communications tutor if we had to had to have sub-headings in our introduction, she said no. We asked her "are you sure?" she says yes I'm sure. We ask her "so we won't get marked down?" she says no. We submit the report and realise we've lost marks from the technical tutor for not having subheadings and her comment on the task sheet was "split introduction into sub-headings" You can't win!

It happens every week too, which defeats the whole purpose of the unit, to give us a process and structure for assignments in second year and beyond. How are we supposed to learn how to do it if the people who run the unit don't know how to do it? Really shits me to tears. :evil:

First question: How many marks did you lose for this discrepancy?

If I were you, I'd talk to your Dean. They'll sort you out: even if you just write an email and tell them what happened to get either some perspective or some affirmative action, it's for the better. I've had marks overturned from a simple email to my Dean - Officeworks' computers didn't recognise a font I used in a project (the front page of a mag), and printed it in Times, so I lost 10 marks; I just emailed the Dean, told him what happened, they let me send them a digital copy instead of a paper one. I ended up with a D instead of a C for it - result! :D