quichefc
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 832,
Visits: 0
|
PV4 - the 4th captain to leave amid acrimony.
I agree the Board are largely to blame but...
Wenger fails to spend when he's publicly been told there is money. Wenger continues to say the team is together, mentally strong etc when performances (esp defensively) suggest otherwise. Sure defend publicly but with our worst defensive season there is scant evidence of him making the necesary changes. Wenger NEVER criticises the Board the way you see Ferguson and Mourinho do - this is part of modern day management at the top level. Only now 16 years in the job has he changed his coaching staff.
|
|
|
|
KenGooner_GCU
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 2.6K,
Visits: 0
|
You're a mug, protecting footballers in public is an ancient art- George Graham was renowned for it. No manager criticises their own team. It's suicide, it's stupid. Ever met a footballer? They're usually egotistical pricks. How'd you reckon that will work? Ferguson hardly criticises the board openly and Mourinho isn't well known to do it openly either. Brian Clough was known to criticise boards openly, didn't work too well for him. Modern day management my arse. Publicly told there is money? Wenger has publicly told that he spends what he is given and has proven it with swathes of signings in his early days. I don't believe Arsene knows best, but you really don't make sense. The big issue: David Dein. I'm stuck 50/50 with this man. Without him we'd have no invincibles, that's a fact. But as people have noted, Usmanov's letter was 'too well timed'. As other people have noted, RVP probably said this on the advice of his agents. Guess who his agent is...
Hello
|
|
|
Neanderthal
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 4K,
Visits: 0
|
KenGooner_GCU wrote:You can keep blaming Wenger if you like, but a craftsman is only as good as his tools. The manager must keep to the budget handed down by the board or he gets the sack. How can we possibly blame Wenger for not spending money that he simply isn't given?
A fish rots from the head? So that's Kroenke and Gazidis not Arsene Wenger.
Wenger out? No, Kroenke out. +1 quichefc wrote:PV4 - the 4th captain to leave amid acrimony.
I agree the Board are largely to blame but...
Wenger fails to spend when he's publicly been told there is money. Wenger continues to say the team is together, mentally strong etc when performances (esp defensively) suggest otherwise. Sure defend publicly but with our worst defensive season there is scant evidence of him making the necesary changes. Wenger NEVER criticises the Board the way you see Ferguson and Mourinho do - this is part of modern day management at the top level. Only now 16 years in the job has he changed his coaching staff. The bolded part is a good point. It is strange. He might see it as a point of dignity not to deflect the pressure and hate towards his employers. Some more club transparency would be nice. It's too hard to know who to blame atm. But in the end it's clear that Kroenke is the one ultimately pulling the strings and having the final say.
|
|
|
quichefc
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 832,
Visits: 0
|
I said defend publicly but he must make changes on the track and this our worst season defensively proves he hasn't and my point about staffing shows they haven't either. Yes men, the lot of them!
Gazidis has said the past two summers at those shareholder mtgs that there is money if wenger wants it. I was Wenger's #1 defender but the club is now going backwards not forwards under him. Two seasons ago he had to speak up about transfer budget if there was an issue but no he said nothing and is therefore an accomplice to our situation.
I don't belive rvp is the end of our hopes for next season as most of our points dropped are through poor defense but he has highlighted the massive club culture problem and Wenger is just as much at the heart of it.
|
|
|
sydneycroatia58
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 40K,
Visits: 0
|
KenGooner_GCU wrote:
The big issue: David Dein. I'm stuck 50/50 with this man. Without him we'd have no invincibles, that's a fact. But as people have noted, Usmanov's letter was 'too well timed'. As other people have noted, RVP probably said this on the advice of his agents. Guess who his agent is...
Without David Dein we also wouldn't have Stan Kroenke, and if David Dein had his way ae'd be playing at Wembley now. Also what has RvP's agent Kees Vos got to do with anything? It's a common misconception that Darren Dein is RvP's agent, he's not. He's just RvP's commercial representative.
|
|
|
sydneycroatia58
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 40K,
Visits: 0
|
Neanderthal wrote: It is strange. He might see it as a point of dignity not to deflect the pressure and hate towards his employers.
Arsene does it because of how loyal he is. He will never come out and speak against the board and the club and would rather cop the brunt of any criticism instead of deflecting it onto someone else. Edited by sydneycroatia58: 7/7/2012 09:12:13 AM
|
|
|
quichefc
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 832,
Visits: 0
|
sydneycroatia58 wrote:Neanderthal wrote: It is strange. He might see it as a point of dignity not to deflect the pressure and hate towards his employers.
Arsene does it because of how loyal he is. He will never come out and speak against the board and the club and would rather cop the brunt of any criticism instead of deflecting it onto someone else. Edited by sydneycroatia58: 7/7/2012 09:12:13 AM Hence why I say he's an accomplice and overestimates his ability... Pissing against the wind to think he can win the league without spending... The result is disaffected players looking to make the most of their short careers why they can. You can say they lack loyalty but the truth is a club can get rid of you just as easily... As I said last night I am a Gooner til I die and will passionately support the team when they take the pitch but something has to change off field and how if we are ever going to seriously challenge for major titles.
|
|
|
sydneycroatia58
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 40K,
Visits: 0
|
This is probably the best analysis of this whole saga that I've seen, and is easily the best ever mail article on Wenger. Quote:[size=6] The man to trust at Arsenal is not RVP, Usmanov or Kroenke... it's Wenger[/size] Arsene Wenger is not the problem at Arsenal. He never has been. He never will be. The Arsenal manager is one of the few men at the top of the game in this country who still appears to have a grasp on reality. He is loyal to his club, even when billionaire oafs banging on the boardroom door clearly do not deserve his discretion. Wenger is loyal to his players, too, although many have let him down. Above all he is loyal to his principles and his beliefs, ignoring the fickle whining from ungrateful fans and the tubby, executive-box clowns spluttering their chin-wobbling indignation over Robin van Persie’s departure into a glass of Chablis. ‘No! No! How can we lose him?’ they cry like giddy, teenage Justin Bieber fans. They demand ‘Wenger must answer for this — or go!’, summoning up all their ignorance and parading it on Twitter. These people are cretins. They should be ignored. The problem at Arsenal lies all around Wenger. He is beseiged by squabbles in the boardroom, ungrateful whelps in the dressing room and idiotic comment in the chatrooms. Right now, Van Persie is trying to pull off a very obvious con trick. The Dutchman, crowned Footballer of the Year after delivering for one season out of an injury-plagued eight, has announced Arsenal ‘do not match my ambition’. Strange that. They certainly seemed to be sufficient for his desires when he was lying on the treatment table collecting the cash. But not any more, it seems. ‘Ambition makes you look pretty ugly, kicking squealing Gucci little piggy,’ declared Radiohead. And that is where Van Persie is now. For all his attempts to dress his exit up as some noble search for the Holy Grail he has so far been denied, it’s still pretty ugly. He has no right to tell Wenger how to run the club. The Arsenal manager gave him his chance when Feyenoord dumped a young Van Persie on the transfer list for being a cocky pain in the backside. The Dutchman has now repaid that debt by effectively trashing the quality of Wenger’s summer signings, Germany striker Lukas Podolski, a 27-year-old striker with more than 100 caps, and the France international and Ligue 1 top scorer, Olivier Giroud, for a combined total of £24million. By any measure, that’s great business. And it is also worth reminding everyone at this point that these excellent acquisitions have been added to a squad that finished third in the table last season. That’s right, poor Arsenal. They finished ‘only’ third in the most lucrative and competitive league in the world, behind a Manchester City that spent more money than Croesus to claim the title. Van Persie can do whatever he likes with his own career. He can refuse to sign new contracts, play for whoever he chooses, earn as much as he can and good luck to him in all that. But to pose and posture as if he is being forced out of the club by their lack of ambition is insulting hogwash at this time. Wenger has undoubtedly bought well this summer and there may be more to come but it sounds as if Van Persie made his decision to let his contract expire long before Podolski and Giroud arrived. ‘Financial terms aren’t my priority,’ claimed the Arsenal captain, however he seems to be chasing the money — we all know that — because it’s sure to offer him a better chance of winning a medal. Just because City have more money than any club in the world, that does not make Wenger less ambitious. Maybe he is just realistic. If Wenger decided Van Persie was worth less than City (or Real Madrid, or whoever) were prepared to offer, then who’s to say he is wrong? For argument’s sake, what if Van Persie indicated he could get £240,000 a week elsewhere — a substantial hike from his current £100,000 — and Wenger took one look at that sum and decided he could not bring himself to hand over an annual rise of £7.3m a year? Would you say he was crazy or quite sane? Personally, I’d applaud him. But, shamefully, the club’s second-largest shareholder Alisher Usmanov jumped on the RVP bandwagon in an attempt to profit from the unrest. He seized the opportunity to stir the pot at Arsenal by hitting out at the principal owner Stan Kroenke. But, since Usmanov has not been given a place on the board despite his 30 per cent stake, we can guess what his motives might be. The conflict behind the scenes suggests the manager may be fighting with one hand behind his back. But, in all of this, there is one man I would trust to have the best interests of the club at heart. It is not Van Persie. It is not Kroenke. It is not Usmanov. It is Wenger. http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/article-2169935/Arsenal-trust-Arsene-Wenger-Robin-van-Persie--Des-Kelly.html Edited by sydneycroatia58: 7/7/2012 10:17:13 AM
|
|
|
Gooner4life_8
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 10K,
Visits: 0
|
Yep, spot one. Agree with every last word of that.
Edited by gooner4life_8: 7/7/2012 02:28:41 PM
|
|
|
KenGooner_GCU
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 2.6K,
Visits: 0
|
sydneycroatia58 wrote:KenGooner_GCU wrote:
The big issue: David Dein. I'm stuck 50/50 with this man. Without him we'd have no invincibles, that's a fact. But as people have noted, Usmanov's letter was 'too well timed'. As other people have noted, RVP probably said this on the advice of his agents. Guess who his agent is...
Without David Dein we also wouldn't have Stan Kroenke, and if David Dein had his way ae'd be playing at Wembley now. Also what has RvP's agent Kees Vos got to do with anything? It's a common misconception that Darren Dein is RvP's agent, he's not. He's just RvP's commercial representative. That's why I'm 50/50 with him, but you can't deny the positives. I thought Dein wanted Usmanov in? That's why he jumped into bed with red and white holdings. Could be mistaken, honestly I try to avoid 'ownership' issues but not it's affecting the team and I'm not happy. 'Commercial representative'? It still doesn't sound good does it.
Hello
|
|
|
robstazzz
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 5.4K,
Visits: 0
|
I agree with pretty much everything in that article but at the same time considering we are in the top 10 richest clubs in the world it really does burn me when we end up selling our best players for the last few years and dont put the money back into the team. Wenger does a excellent job for Arsenal considering he is outside the top 10 spending clubs in the EPL. Last season was a joke selling players like Nasri,Fabregas,Clichy and bring in only Arteta as a proven player with Oxlade as a up and coming star. This season so far is different though as we have already signed two great players with experience especially Podolski and both are not young kids so its good to see for a change. As for RVP he is simply a dog if he leaves us especially for more a move to another EPL club.Fabregas was different as he went back to his hometown club and i have nothing but respect for the guy and he played pretty much a full season every year for Arsenal unlike RVP who has only had one great year and all of a sudden feels the club lacks ambition. I would have accepted this last pre season but not this year cosidering the two great signings we have made. If however we do sell RVP and not use that money to get a top quality player in either defence or midfield then again i will be pissed off by the big guys calling the shots at Arsenal especially the tightass Kronke.
|
|
|
sydneycroatia58
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 40K,
Visits: 0
|
KenGooner_GCU wrote:sydneycroatia58 wrote:KenGooner_GCU wrote:
The big issue: David Dein. I'm stuck 50/50 with this man. Without him we'd have no invincibles, that's a fact. But as people have noted, Usmanov's letter was 'too well timed'. As other people have noted, RVP probably said this on the advice of his agents. Guess who his agent is...
Without David Dein we also wouldn't have Stan Kroenke, and if David Dein had his way ae'd be playing at Wembley now. Also what has RvP's agent Kees Vos got to do with anything? It's a common misconception that Darren Dein is RvP's agent, he's not. He's just RvP's commercial representative. That's why I'm 50/50 with him, but you can't deny the positives. I thought Dein wanted Usmanov in? That's why he jumped into bed with red and white holdings. Could be mistaken, honestly I try to avoid 'ownership' issues but not it's affecting the team and I'm not happy. 'Commercial representative'? It still doesn't sound good does it. Dein originally wanted to bring Kroenke in and was the one who brought him to the club, then once he couldn't get Kroenke fully in he put all his eggs in the Usmanov basket. As for Darren Dein, yeah it doesn't sound good, but the whole Dein thing is overplayed imo. He doesn't have that much influence in what RvP or any player does. He's not involved in any talks with the player and club. robstazzz wrote: Last season was a joke selling players like Nasri,Fabregas,Clichy and bring in only Arteta as a proven player with Oxlade as a up and coming star. Really, Arteta the only proven player? How about that 24 year old Ivorian winger with 38 caps that we signed. Or that 26 year old South Korean captain with 59 caps, the 27 year old German with 81 caps, the 29 year old Brazilian with 22 caps? Are they not proven players? Oh and say what you want about Park now, but there's no arguing that when he signed he was a signing with proven experience, both at a decent level in Europe and internationally.
|
|
|
robstazzz
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 5.4K,
Visits: 0
|
sydneycroatia58 wrote:KenGooner_GCU wrote:sydneycroatia58 wrote:KenGooner_GCU wrote:
The big issue: David Dein. I'm stuck 50/50 with this man. Without him we'd have no invincibles, that's a fact. But as people have noted, Usmanov's letter was 'too well timed'. As other people have noted, RVP probably said this on the advice of his agents. Guess who his agent is...
Without David Dein we also wouldn't have Stan Kroenke, and if David Dein had his way ae'd be playing at Wembley now. Also what has RvP's agent Kees Vos got to do with anything? It's a common misconception that Darren Dein is RvP's agent, he's not. He's just RvP's commercial representative. That's why I'm 50/50 with him, but you can't deny the positives. I thought Dein wanted Usmanov in? That's why he jumped into bed with red and white holdings. Could be mistaken, honestly I try to avoid 'ownership' issues but not it's affecting the team and I'm not happy. 'Commercial representative'? It still doesn't sound good does it. Dein originally wanted to bring Kroenke in and was the one who brought him to the club, then once he couldn't get Kroenke fully in he put all his eggs in the Usmanov basket. As for Darren Dein, yeah it doesn't sound good, but the whole Dein thing is overplayed imo. He doesn't have that much influence in what RvP or any player does. He's not involved in any talks with the player and club. robstazzz wrote: Last season was a joke selling players like Nasri,Fabregas,Clichy and bring in only Arteta as a proven player with Oxlade as a up and coming star. Really, Arteta the only proven player? How about that 24 year old Ivorian winger with 38 caps that we signed. Or that 26 year old South Korean captain with 59 caps, the 27 year old German with 81 caps, the 29 year old Brazilian with 22 caps? Are they not proven players? Oh and say what you want about Park now, but there's no arguing that when he signed he was a signing with proven experience, both at a decent level in Europe and internationally. lol you went through alot of trouble looking up those stats but to be honest what i meant to say was that Arteta was the only proven player in the EPL. To be honest i actually completely forgot about Gervinho for some weird reason as one of the signings but even before the season i never was pumped up about the signings of Santos or Park not one bit and dont really rate them good enough for a club in the top 4. We should be aiming much higher then that especially at the time when we had just sold Nasri and Fabregas and Clichy. You seriously cant say any of those signings were decent ones to replace the huge loss we had where as if we lose RVP i think already with Podolski and Giroud we have found two very decent players to do the job.
|
|
|
zimbos_05
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 15K,
Visits: 0
|
Anyone keen to come and discuss RVP on tuesdays fan forum?
|
|
|
jlm8695
|
|
Group: Banned Members
Posts: 19K,
Visits: 0
|
Whilst unlikely at best, Jovetic would be a fantastic signing.
With the fact that we've been in for him before, and Fiorentina's interst in Chamakh, I'm cautiously optimistic over a deal getting done.
Although it probably wont happen, I can still hope :D
Edited by jlm8695: 9/7/2012 11:59:27 PM
|
|
|
quichefc
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 832,
Visits: 0
|
Will Arsene do anything this off season to solve our defensive ineptitude as he's failed to do so thus far...? Last season was the clubs worst defensively in epl history and so far he's signed giroud and podolski...
Lloris would be a start, but we need another CB (per not up to it imo), someone to challenge Sagna and another to challenge Song as DMC... both for squad depth and to challenge them both to go to the next level.
Aside from system what would you do to improve the Gunners defensively???
|
|
|
jlm8695
|
|
Group: Banned Members
Posts: 19K,
Visits: 0
|
quichefc wrote:Will Arsene do anything this off season to solve our defensive ineptitude as he's failed to do so thus far...? Last season was the clubs worst defensively in epl history and so far he's signed giroud and podolski...
Lloris would be a start, but we need another CB (per not up to it imo), someone to challenge Sagna and another to challenge Song as DMC... both for squad depth and to challenge them both to go to the next level.
Aside from system what would you do to improve the Gunners defensively??? First of all, Lloris would be a waste. High wages, high fee and not first choice by any means. A more experienced back-up would do fine. Think Craig Gordon's still available on a free. The question with our defence is who will partner Kos? I would personally lean towards a Kos-Mertesacker partnership, as I feel Kos-Verm is too similar, and Vermaelan is too attacking for me. We will only sign a new CB if Djorou leaves, otherwise we are covered. I dont know if we need a back-up for Sagna. Jenkinson still has alot of potential imo, loves the club and didnt do too bad last season. Can also cross the ball which is handy with the signing of Giroud. LB is covered with Gibbs/Santos. As for Song, its all down to the way we play imo. The double midfield pivot is certainly nice for ball retention, but we get torn apart on the counter. If Wenger tells Song to stay back this season, then we should be fine. Need a back-up though, as Frimpong needs to go out on loan to a BPL club.
|
|
|
sydneycroatia58
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 40K,
Visits: 0
|
:lol: at anyone who believes a word of those Lloris stories. We will not be signing him.
As for CB's, it all depends on if Djourou leaves. If he leaves then yes I think we will buy another CB, but not unless he leaves.
The one thing I really want is a true defensive midfielder, it's the one thing we really need I think.
Any other signings would depend on departures.
|
|
|
sydneycroatia58
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 40K,
Visits: 0
|
On a lighter note, here's the home page of RvP's official website :lol:
|
|
|
sydneycroatia58
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 40K,
Visits: 0
|
|
|
|
sydneycroatia58
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 40K,
Visits: 0
|
Good to see Diaby is still alive. Although presumably this photo was taken right before he dropped those weights in his ankles and snapped every ligament possible
|
|
|
imnofreak
|
|
Group: Moderators
Posts: 35K,
Visits: 0
|
Would not want to fuck with him :lol:
|
|
|
afromanGT
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 77K,
Visits: 0
|
Rumours flying around that RVP is in a meeting with the Arsenal board over a new contract.
|
|
|
Roar_Brisbane
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 14K,
Visits: 0
|
afromanGT wrote:Rumours flying around that RVP is in a meeting with the Arsenal board over a new contract. Is it credible. We have heard all sorts of rumors about RVP and Arsenal.
|
|
|
afromanGT
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 77K,
Visits: 0
|
Roar_Brisbane wrote:afromanGT wrote:Rumours flying around that RVP is in a meeting with the Arsenal board over a new contract. Is it credible. We have heard all sorts of rumors about RVP and Arsenal. It's popped up on a dozen sites citing Reuters as the article's source.
|
|
|
BETHFC
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 8.2K,
Visits: 0
|
Will wait to see whether Sydcro does another backflip on his opinion of RVP :lol:
|
|
|
imnofreak
|
|
Group: Moderators
Posts: 35K,
Visits: 0
|
I will lol so hard if he signs a new deal and Sydcro tries SO hard to take back everything he said :lol:
|
|
|
sydneycroatia58
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 40K,
Visits: 0
|
Like I said, if he signed a new contract the only thing that would change is I would be a little less angry about this whole thing. It would take a lot more than that to turn me around on him.
The more interesting rumours are the ones about him firing his agent because of that whole announcement.
|
|
|
sydneycroatia58
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 40K,
Visits: 0
|
afromanGT wrote:Roar_Brisbane wrote:afromanGT wrote:Rumours flying around that RVP is in a meeting with the Arsenal board over a new contract. Is it credible. We have heard all sorts of rumors about RVP and Arsenal. It's popped up on a dozen sites citing Reuters as the article's source. Yeah he cut his holiday short to come back to London to have ore discussions with Wenger and Gazidis without his agent there.
|
|
|
sydneycroatia58
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 40K,
Visits: 0
|
imnofreak wrote:I will lol so hard if he signs a new deal and Sydcro tries SO hard to take back everything he said :lol: Him signing a new deal wouldn't make me take anything back. It'll take a whole lot more than that for me to take anything I said back. Signing a new deal would be a good starting point though.
|
|
|