paulbagzFC
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 44K,
Visits: 0
|
thupercoach wrote:afromanGT wrote:thupercoach wrote:This is getting silly. If people can't see that it's healthy for the economy to have people earn more and spend money then there's no hope.
Money in the hand if people is always better than money in the hand of government. Except they don't spend it. They stockpile it. See my two posts earlier Afro. They spend a fortune on all kinds of services which benefits the service providers. I'm one of those service providers so I should know. But do you have 25 years in that industry running a multi million dollar company employing over 9000 employees in that service? =; -PB
|
|
|
|
notorganic
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 21K,
Visits: 0
|
paulbagzFC wrote:thupercoach wrote:afromanGT wrote:thupercoach wrote:This is getting silly. If people can't see that it's healthy for the economy to have people earn more and spend money then there's no hope.
Money in the hand if people is always better than money in the hand of government. Except they don't spend it. They stockpile it. See my two posts earlier Afro. They spend a fortune on all kinds of services which benefits the service providers. I'm one of those service providers so I should know. But do you have 25 years in that industry running a multi million dollar company employing over 9000 employees in that service? =; -PB And firing none of them haha.
|
|
|
notorganic
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 21K,
Visits: 0
|
Anyway, back to actual politics and away from batfinks failure to understand the legislation he is rallying against, when the federal ALP lose this election, who takes over as leader?
|
|
|
rocknerd
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 5.6K,
Visits: 0
|
If this country is smart we'll see Labour continue. The most important things in this election are and should be Education, Equality, NBN and Health funding. The Labour party are actually trying to lead this country forward where as the LNP are happy to see Australia stagnate just to balance a ledger.
we have an adequate PPL that can be revised in the future to meet wage demands and we can be more competitive to increase income with a NBN that is only limited by the speed of light.
|
|
|
batfink
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 9.9K,
Visits: 0
|
notorganic wrote:batfink wrote:notorganic wrote:batfink wrote:afromanGT wrote:batfink wrote:notorganic wrote:It's not unlawful dismissal to fire a worker that isn't performing to the expected standard after written performance or behavioural warnings.
It sounds like you don't know the legislation very well. condescending much....
i would suggest i know the legislation far better than you having been dealing with it on a first hand basis for many years....it's obvious you haven't come across professional bludgers and union bullies..... :lol: Condescending much? I would suggest you don't know the legislation as well as you think if you don't know how to apply it to relieve inadequate employees of their position. KPI's, monthly performance reviews, time and attendance issues and customer relations are all plenty adequate reasons to give written warnings cumulatively allowing you to fire a person. So if you're in a position where you've got issues with "professional bludgers" and "union bullies" working for you, perhaps you A) need to look at your inadequate recruitment, and B) re-learn workplace dismissal laws. Also, from the cases of unfair dismissal I've seen (I dealt with a few while I was at the Casino and IIRC the results of cases are readily available online) unless there's a fairly egregious aberration by the employer, the commission generally side with them. mate the unlawfull dismissal laws coupled with the construction industries regulations are a far cry from some gump working at star casino..... the construction industry is riddled with court cases from unlawful dismissal so it's obviously easier in an admin / office enviroment as opposed to our industry............ Construction isn't special as an industry. All workers have expectations, and if a worker is not meeting expectations it's entirely lawful to transition them out of your business. It just sounds like you are demanding changes in legislation to cover for poor management practice. Of course you are right Matt......having experience in the construction industry yourself....what is your background again.....tele marketing for teletech???? and field maanger for roy morgan research???? however i must say your webpage looks rather impressive....... anyway keep up the trolling about being a poor manager it gives me a good laugh and brings a huge smile to my face.....and perhaps if you manage your organic cotton venture as well as i have managed my contracting firm you will end up lasting in business for 25 years as i have and end up successful and lead a varied and rewarding life. ;) good luck sunshine :lol: being called a poor manager made you angry enough to look at my LinkedIn? Insecure much? Angry???? I'm not angry??? i didn't look at linkedIn?
|
|
|
batfink
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 9.9K,
Visits: 0
|
paulbagzFC wrote:You're a bad manager by your own admission when you whinged about not being able to fire people.
Just stfu already batfink.
Nobody cares.
-PB what rubbish.....i have no problem firing employee's when there is a need...... but there are many small businesses out there who struggle with these IR laws and don't have the resources to deal with it....... really intelligent post by the way schmuck
|
|
|
batfink
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 9.9K,
Visits: 0
|
notorganic wrote:Anyway, back to actual politics and away from batfinks failure to understand the legislation he is rallying against, when the federal ALP lose this election, who takes over as leader? grow up Matt.....do you really need to white ant someone to try and make yourself look better than you actually are....laughable
|
|
|
rusty
|
|
Group: Banned Members
Posts: 6.1K,
Visits: 0
|
rocknerd wrote:If this country is smart we'll see Labour continue. The most important things in this election are and should be Education, Equality, NBN and Health funding. The Labour party are actually trying to lead this country forward where as the LNP are happy to see Australia stagnate just to balance a ledger.
we have an adequate PPL that can be revised in the future to meet wage demands and we can be more competitive to increase income with a NBN that is only limited by the speed of light. Only dumb people think you can continually fund education, equality, NBN and health funding with a shrinking economy. This kind of dumb ass rationale that you can you spend and leave the mess to future generations is what brought countries like Greece (and currently US) to its knees. The problem with leaving it to future governments to fix is those governments want to spend as well, and they can just as easily pass the buck to future government and so on and so forth. Until you finally reach a crisis point where public expenditure is so high if you start making cuts people people sprawl out onto the streets in anarchy or the government decides the best way to pull itself out of debt is to spend more money, and those fiscal strategies fail miserably and you have a compounding financial crisis and you end up relinquishing control of your country to a foreign bank . Smart people live in the now, they can see problems before they arise and react to prevent crisis before they happen. Gee you would think after watching much of the world fall into recession we might be a bit more prudent with our spending, but no lets just spend ourselves into a black hole of debt like the rest of the world.
|
|
|
batfink
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 9.9K,
Visits: 0
|
rusty wrote:rocknerd wrote:If this country is smart we'll see Labour continue. The most important things in this election are and should be Education, Equality, NBN and Health funding. The Labour party are actually trying to lead this country forward where as the LNP are happy to see Australia stagnate just to balance a ledger.
we have an adequate PPL that can be revised in the future to meet wage demands and we can be more competitive to increase income with a NBN that is only limited by the speed of light. Only dumb people think you can continually fund education, equality, NBN and health funding with a shrinking economy. This kind of dumb ass rationale that you can you spend and leave the mess to future generations is what brought countries like Greece (and currently US) to its knees. The problem with leaving it to future governments to fix is those governments want to spend as well, and they can just as easily pass the buck to future government and so on and so forth. Until you finally reach a crisis point where public expenditure is so high if you start making cuts people people sprawl out onto the streets in anarchy or the government decides the best way to pull itself out of debt is to spend more money, and those fiscal strategies fail miserably and you have a compounding financial crisis and you end up relinquishing control of your country to a foreign bank . Smart people live in the now, they can see problems before they arise and react to prevent crisis before they happen. Gee you would think after watching much of the world fall into recession we might be a bit more prudent with our spending, but no lets just spend ourselves into a black hole of debt like the rest of the world. Oh please rusty.....don't talk sense.....they just don't understand it.......talk in semantics and you will have their ears....and we can all fap off about being over educated underachieving intellectual dysfunctional uber hipster flakes....all of them appear here..... [youtube]WH_MBwQhGgA[/youtube]
|
|
|
thupercoach
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 8.3K,
Visits: 0
|
notorganic wrote:Anyway, back to actual politics and away from batfinks failure to understand the legislation he is rallying against, when the federal ALP lose this election, who takes over as leader? Penny Wong. That way at the first sign of Lib criticism she can play the misogyny AND race card.
|
|
|
rusty
|
|
Group: Banned Members
Posts: 6.1K,
Visits: 0
|
thupercoach wrote:notorganic wrote:Anyway, back to actual politics and away from batfinks failure to understand the legislation he is rallying against, when the federal ALP lose this election, who takes over as leader? Penny Wong. That way at the first sign of Lib criticism she can play the misogyny AND race card. Sexuality card as well. Triple play.
|
|
|
thupercoach
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 8.3K,
Visits: 0
|
rusty wrote:thupercoach wrote:notorganic wrote:Anyway, back to actual politics and away from batfinks failure to understand the legislation he is rallying against, when the federal ALP lose this election, who takes over as leader? Penny Wong. That way at the first sign of Lib criticism she can play the misogyny AND race card. Sexuality card as well. Triple play. Oh yeah, forgot about that. Ticks all the boxes. Misogyny, racism and homophobia. Definitely a triple play.
|
|
|
bovs
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 1.7K,
Visits: 0
|
thupercoach wrote:notorganic wrote:Anyway, back to actual politics and away from batfinks failure to understand the legislation he is rallying against, when the federal ALP lose this election, who takes over as leader? Penny Wong. That way at the first sign of Lib criticism she can play the misogyny AND race card. Don't forget homophobia!!! I think it's most likely to be Bill Shorten isn't it? There was a lot of conjecture before Rudd knifed Gillard that Shorten would likely support Rudd on the assumption that Gillard was going to lose so badly it would take 10 years for the federal ALP to recover... whereas Rudd would still lost but save enough seats for Shorten to build a competitive opposition within 2 terms. Personally I think Shorten is going to take the ALP *back* 10 years... and just make it all the more necessary for Australian politics that a centre-left party NOT tied to the unions (i.e. Democrats until their right-shift during the late 90s killed them off) re-emerges in Australia.
|
|
|
notorganic
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 21K,
Visits: 0
|
batfink wrote:i didn't look at linkedIn? Yes, you did, or you looked at a site that scrapes LinkedIn information. It's the only place on the internet that has those things listed in the way you are describing them. It's fine to look - it's all public information and I'm not ashamed of my career as much as you are trying to put it down. Did you like my pic? I know I look quite young in it, but I work hard on my health so I don't turn into a cranky old man ;) I wasn't involved in telemarketing at TeleTech, btw, I started as a humble 19 year old tech support agent and by the time I left a year later I was managing a team of 20 support agents. Through my management career (which will be in it's 9th year this year) I would say that I've had a reasonable amount of success in whatever project or department I was working in, increasing profit margins and productivity for other people. I learned to performance manage people out of organisations maybe in my third or fourth year? I'm amazed that you haven't learned the same with your 25 years and counting. Funnily enough, Unions generally don't understand the legislation either, so the Fairwork changes really didn't matter too much. A bit of extra work in accommodating Union entry rights and pulling them into line when they would try and assert themselves beyond the legislation, but nothing that a bit of reading comprehension and strongly worded emails didn't fix.
|
|
|
rocknerd
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 5.6K,
Visits: 0
|
rusty wrote:rocknerd wrote:If this country is smart we'll see Labour continue. The most important things in this election are and should be Education, Equality, NBN and Health funding. The Labour party are actually trying to lead this country forward where as the LNP are happy to see Australia stagnate just to balance a ledger.
we have an adequate PPL that can be revised in the future to meet wage demands and we can be more competitive to increase income with a NBN that is only limited by the speed of light. Only dumb people think you can continually fund education, equality, NBN and health funding with a shrinking economy. This kind of dumb ass rationale that you can you spend and leave the mess to future generations is what brought countries like Greece (and currently US) to its knees. The problem with leaving it to future governments to fix is those governments want to spend as well, and they can just as easily pass the buck to future government and so on and so forth. Until you finally reach a crisis point where public expenditure is so high if you start making cuts people people sprawl out onto the streets in anarchy or the government decides the best way to pull itself out of debt is to spend more money, and those fiscal strategies fail miserably and you have a compounding financial crisis and you end up relinquishing control of your country to a foreign bank . Smart people live in the now, they can see problems before they arise and react to prevent crisis before they happen. Gee you would think after watching much of the world fall into recession we might be a bit more prudent with our spending, but no lets just spend ourselves into a black hole of debt like the rest of the world. So you would rather have an ineffective NBN that ends up costing more in the long run than spending the money now and getting it right and actually competing in the global market? you'd rather continue to under fund education leading to our school system continuing to slide down the world rankings? A healthy and smart country is a prosperous country. Living in the now is living in the past. you need to look to the future to and build for it or be left behind. Equality is just important and needs to happen.
|
|
|
paulbagzFC
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 44K,
Visits: 0
|
batfink wrote:Oh please rusty.....don't talk sense.....they just don't understand it.......talk in semantics and you will have their ears....and we can all fap off about being over educated underachieving intellectual dysfunctional uber hipster flakes....all of them appear here.....
[youtube]WH_MBwQhGgA[/youtube] batfink doesn't know satire when he sees it :lol: Dear oh dear :lol: -PB
|
|
|
bovs
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 1.7K,
Visits: 0
|
rusty wrote:bovs wrote:Well if this is the case... why doesn't the Liberal party actually debate policy and ideology, rather than constantly scare-mongering about the state of the economy?
I'm not a Labor supporter... I'd probably vote for the Liberal Party at this election EXCEPT for the fact that they won't actually put forward a proper reason for anyone to vote for them. I don't consider "because Labor is crap" to be a good enough reason to vote Liberal. Not sure if you've been listening carefully enough. They have been debating policy, for example the PPL scheme we are talking about, the NBN on which the libs have their own version, as well as throwing their support behind NDIS and Gonski, as well as today releasing $30 billion in cuts. They have also said they will return the budget to surplus, which isn't exactly "scaremongering" as much as it is sound fiscal policy. A good reason to vote for the Coalition is their strong record on economic management, in which the previous Liberal government delivered something like ten surpluses, while the current government has delivered only deficits with absolutely no clue on how to restore balance to the economy and no balls to make cuts where needed. Was cringeworthy watching Ed Husic on Sky tonight, he basically admitted Labor had plan to return the budget to surplus in the near future. Labor people have this weird idea that debt will magically disappear over time, or some future government will take care of it. They are right, it will be the current opposition cum incumbent in September. Quote:If the Liberals want to sell this as something that is going to grow the economy and secure the future of Australia and part of a wider plan for social reform, they should do that.
At the moment they're selling it as, "Look we don't hate women... we're giving them money, see!" And at the same time bleating about how little money we have. Those business savings you mention won't go to the budget bottom dollar and the fact that the levy on big business is being offset by the corporate tax reduction just makes it WORSE because that's LESS money coming in to fix the "crisis". Cutting the corporate tax rate will stimulate the economy, boost productivity and create jobs. Giving it to business to reinvest in the economy rather than spend it on social programs will generate more revenue in the long term. Australia already has high corporate tax rate, one of the highest in the developed world, so we are due for a tax cut to make us more regionally domestically and regionally competitive. Getting rid of the silly carbon tax will also help lift the mood of businesses and make Australia more attractive to run and start business, thereby creating more revenue through increased business acitivty and revenue streams. Quote:If Tony Abbott chose the word "crisis". That's as in, "We have to do something and do it RIGHT NOW or we'll be up shit creek without a paddle". A 5-year transition of returning confidence to business to eventually pick up extra tax revenue off an increased GDP isn't a solution to a "crisis". I'm not sure he chose the word "crisis" though, did he? We're not in crisis yet, but we will be unless we get public expenditure under control. Cutting to the bone too early will cause damage so I get why the libs arent over committing on delivering a surplus right now, but we need a pathway to it. The best way to solve a crisis is to avoid one, so we need to treat this election as crisis aversion. The Liberal Party *did* very deliberately choose the expression "crisis" to explain the current budget situation... although admittedly they've back-tracked on that now. I don't have any doubts that reducing taxes is going to help stimulate the economy in the LONG term... but then a large amount of responsibility for the high corporate tax in Australia that you talk about must surely sit with the previous Howard government?! Don't even get me started on the carbon tax... a stupid tax that doesn't even really effect anyone anyway because it's subsidising companies by more than it's taxing them! Stupid? Yes! Bad for the economy? I don't buy it. I actually don't think my biggest issue with the Liberal Party is Tony Abbott (as much as I don't like him)... it's Joe Hockey. You can say all you want about the LNP good record on economic management, but with this guy as treasurer I reckon you can throw all that out the door and accept that it's going to be a massive risk in how capable he actually is for that role. He's likeable enough... but treasurer? Seriously? Once you add up Abbott's recking-ball politics (he seems to be in politics not because he has his own ideals but just because he loves fighting "lefties"), Hockey's inability to manage sums and lack of trust in what is going to be his own department, and the thoroughly dislikable background types in Mirabella, Pyne and Brandis... it really isn't any better a team than Labor. The only reason to support them seems to me to be because of unquestioned loyalty to the LNP brand. I say all of that, I add, as someone who has only once ever preferenced a major party first when voting (Libs at the WA state election since the choice was ALP, Libs, Greens or Family First). I've *never* been a supporter of the ALP... but I just feel like the current Liberal Party team is as far below their usual political standard as the current ALP team is... and the combined crapness of both major parties is *why* it's easier for them both to just attack each other rather than working on constructive politics.
|
|
|
rusty
|
|
Group: Banned Members
Posts: 6.1K,
Visits: 0
|
rocknerd wrote:So you would rather have an ineffective NBN that ends up costing more in the long run than spending the money now and getting it right and actually competing in the global market? you'd rather continue to under fund education leading to our school system continuing to slide down the world rankings?
A healthy and smart country is a prosperous country. Living in the now is living in the past. you need to look to the future to and build for it or be left behind.
Equality is just important and needs to happen. You can't build for the future if you have no money to spend. Growing the economy is the most important thing in the world. Grow the economy and you can have your NBN, Gonski and everything else you want. Putting the economy on the backburner for the sake of equality will achieve the exact opposite, everything good stems from a strong, robust economy and the only way to have that is to spend and save within your means. Spend too much too soon and you jeapordise everything.
|
|
|
paulbagzFC
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 44K,
Visits: 0
|
Interesting press conference with Labour now poking holes in Liberal costings/accounting. Would like to see LNP's response. -PB
|
|
|
notorganic
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 21K,
Visits: 0
|
paulbagzFC wrote:Interesting press conference with Labour now poking holes in Liberal costings/accounting.
Would like to see LNP's response.
-PB "Just more lies from the great Kevin Con. Trust us. Really. We'll find the money somewhere.
|
|
|
paulbagzFC
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 44K,
Visits: 0
|
Well they want to make up this 60bil hole, how the fark are they going to do that? -PB
|
|
|
rocknerd
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 5.6K,
Visits: 0
|
rusty wrote:rocknerd wrote:So you would rather have an ineffective NBN that ends up costing more in the long run than spending the money now and getting it right and actually competing in the global market? you'd rather continue to under fund education leading to our school system continuing to slide down the world rankings?
A healthy and smart country is a prosperous country. Living in the now is living in the past. you need to look to the future to and build for it or be left behind.
Equality is just important and needs to happen. You can't build for the future if you have no money to spend. Growing the economy is the most important thing in the world. Grow the economy and you can have your NBN, Gonski and everything else you want. Putting the economy on the backburner for the sake of equality will achieve the exact opposite, everything good stems from a strong, robust economy and the only way to have that is to spend and save within your means. Spend too much too soon and you jeapordise everything. yet spending and borrowing now means we're are able to grow the economy quicker and use the best technologies available to get us into a better situation. Sitting back and falling further behind means we'll still have to over spend in the future to catch up.
|
|
|
rusty
|
|
Group: Banned Members
Posts: 6.1K,
Visits: 0
|
paulbagzFC wrote:Well they want to make up this 60bil hole, how the fark are they going to do that?
-PB They've already announced $30 billion in cuts, how many cuts have Labor announced?
|
|
|
paulbagzFC
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 44K,
Visits: 0
|
rusty wrote:paulbagzFC wrote:Well they want to make up this 60bil hole, how the fark are they going to do that?
-PB They've already announced $30 billion in cuts, how many cuts have Labor announced? None. I'm not asking about Labour, I'm asking about how the LNP is going to make up 30bil. -PB
|
|
|
rusty
|
|
Group: Banned Members
Posts: 6.1K,
Visits: 0
|
rocknerd wrote:rusty wrote:rocknerd wrote:So you would rather have an ineffective NBN that ends up costing more in the long run than spending the money now and getting it right and actually competing in the global market? you'd rather continue to under fund education leading to our school system continuing to slide down the world rankings?
A healthy and smart country is a prosperous country. Living in the now is living in the past. you need to look to the future to and build for it or be left behind.
Equality is just important and needs to happen. You can't build for the future if you have no money to spend. Growing the economy is the most important thing in the world. Grow the economy and you can have your NBN, Gonski and everything else you want. Putting the economy on the backburner for the sake of equality will achieve the exact opposite, everything good stems from a strong, robust economy and the only way to have that is to spend and save within your means. Spend too much too soon and you jeapordise everything. yet spending and borrowing now means we're are able to grow the economy quicker and use the best technologies available to get us into a better situation. Sitting back and falling further behind means we'll still have to over spend in the future to catch up. So naive. Labor have already spent and borrowed a quarter of a billion dollars and the end result is a slow economy and growing unemployment. You can't grow the economy if it's shrinking, you need to stimulate the economy in areas where growth and increased productivity can directly occur, in the form of tax cuts to small and corporate business, PPL to get more women working, infrastructure and incentives to get welfare bludgers into work. Labors plan of "growing the economy" by borrowing billions to buy more wheelchairs, more calculators and a snail pace NBN is pathetic, it's a joke.
|
|
|
rocknerd
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 5.6K,
Visits: 0
|
rusty wrote:rocknerd wrote:rusty wrote:rocknerd wrote:So you would rather have an ineffective NBN that ends up costing more in the long run than spending the money now and getting it right and actually competing in the global market? you'd rather continue to under fund education leading to our school system continuing to slide down the world rankings?
A healthy and smart country is a prosperous country. Living in the now is living in the past. you need to look to the future to and build for it or be left behind.
Equality is just important and needs to happen. You can't build for the future if you have no money to spend. Growing the economy is the most important thing in the world. Grow the economy and you can have your NBN, Gonski and everything else you want. Putting the economy on the backburner for the sake of equality will achieve the exact opposite, everything good stems from a strong, robust economy and the only way to have that is to spend and save within your means. Spend too much too soon and you jeapordise everything. yet spending and borrowing now means we're are able to grow the economy quicker and use the best technologies available to get us into a better situation. Sitting back and falling further behind means we'll still have to over spend in the future to catch up. So naive. Labor have already spent and borrowed a quarter of a billion dollars and the end result is a slow economy and growing unemployment. You can't grow the economy if it's shrinking, you need to stimulate the economy in areas where growth and increased productivity can directly occur, in the form of tax cuts to small and corporate business, PPL to get more women working, infrastructure and incentives to get welfare bludgers into work. Labors plan of "growing the economy" by borrowing billions to buy more wheelchairs, more calculators and a snail pace NBN is pathetic, it's a joke. PPL will not get more women working it will get more women having babies and staying out of the work force (most likely) for longer periods. This creates a vacuum of temporary placements that need filling (as the Proposed PPL is aimed at higher wage earners) in more higher skilled White collar industries. Actually the best way to stimulate the economy is to ensure that Australian Manufacturing and agriculture is protected from overseas business and importers. we need to reintroduce import taxes on companies who have removed business from Australia because why make a car in Australia for Australian when they can make the same car in China and import it for less? these companies need to pay the way if they want us to by their product. Same goes for Companies like Coles Myer and Woolworths importing Fruit and Veg that is of a poorer quality but cheap price forcing farmers to have to turn in entire crops or sell well below market value to attempt to keep their family properties from failing. The Dairy industry is being crippled with the low prices war and we're beginning to see the same effects in Tasmanian apple farms as well. paying people to hold jobs is not going to get Joe Average to hold on to his job, I work in the JSA field with these people and if they can't hold a job now for 12 months it's due to being bludgers or not having the relevant education or skills to get the job they want and lacking hands on employment experience. There are already enough incentives available to employers to higher these people FYI. Wage subsidies, employer contributions, government Apprentice/trainee payments, Employment pathway funds to cover the cost of tools, clothing, travel and anything else you may need to start work. Plus there are bonus payments for employers and Job seekers how gain work in Skills shortage areas, however these fields are often filled by 475 Visas as Australian workers often lack the hands on skills to fill these jobs and it's also cheaper for the companies to high foreign works as they'll take the lower paying end of the spectrum. As for health it's an unavoidable necessity to help those people in need and we need to ensure that they get the support they need so they can return to employment and if not be able to live as independently as possible so as not to burden family causing them to have to remove or reduce their ability to work and pay their own mortgages. I also don't think you understand how the NBN works. The money being spent is preparing the way for information to be produced via the speed of light and unless I'm mistaken that's just a little bit quicker than the deteriorating copper network that we are using now and that Abbott wishes to leave in place for the foreseeable future because he doesn't understand how the internet or the Web works. There is light at the end of the tunnel but you need to ride out the darkness to get to the other side. we will return to surplus in the future and we'll be a better country for investing and preparing the way to be able to stay competitive.
|
|
|
paulbagzFC
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 44K,
Visits: 0
|
|
|
|
batfink
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 9.9K,
Visits: 0
|
notorganic wrote:batfink wrote:i didn't look at linkedIn? Yes, you did, no i didn't or you looked at a site that scrapes LinkedIn information. It's the only place on the internet that has those things listed in the way you are describing them. It's fine to look - it's all public information and I'm not ashamed of my career as much as you are trying to put it down. i am not putting you down,just stating that you don't have experience in the construction industry,also gave you a wrap about your web site,Did you like my pic? I know I look quite young in it, but I work hard on my health so I don't turn into a cranky old man ;)seriously i am not a cranky old man.... most of my posts are in good humour and taken the wrong way....i love taking the pissI wasn't involved in telemarketing at TeleTech, btw, I started as a humble 19 year old tech support agent and by the time I left a year later I was managing a team of 20 support agents. well doneThrough my management career (which will be in it's 9th year this year) I would say that I've had a reasonable amount of success in whatever project or department I was working in, increasing profit margins and productivity for other people. good stuffI learned to performance manage people out of organisations maybe in my third or fourth year? I'm amazed that you haven't learned the same with your 25 years and counting. well to be honest i do,i don't have staffing issues very often and my employee's truly like working WITH me and i am proud to treat them they way i would like to be treated and many of them talk to me about family and personal issues and i am happy to lean an ear and offer advice, Funnily enough, Unions generally don't understand the legislation either, so the Fairwork changes really didn't matter too much. don't agree sorry A bit of extra work in accommodating Union entry rights and pulling them into line when they would try and assert themselves beyond the legislation, but nothing that a bit of reading comprehension and strongly worded emails didn't fix.
|
|
|
notorganic
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 21K,
Visits: 0
|
batfink wrote:no i didn't Where did it come from?
|
|
|
bovs
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 1.7K,
Visits: 0
|
rusty wrote:rocknerd wrote:rusty wrote:rocknerd wrote:So you would rather have an ineffective NBN that ends up costing more in the long run than spending the money now and getting it right and actually competing in the global market? you'd rather continue to under fund education leading to our school system continuing to slide down the world rankings?
A healthy and smart country is a prosperous country. Living in the now is living in the past. you need to look to the future to and build for it or be left behind.
Equality is just important and needs to happen. You can't build for the future if you have no money to spend. Growing the economy is the most important thing in the world. Grow the economy and you can have your NBN, Gonski and everything else you want. Putting the economy on the backburner for the sake of equality will achieve the exact opposite, everything good stems from a strong, robust economy and the only way to have that is to spend and save within your means. Spend too much too soon and you jeapordise everything. yet spending and borrowing now means we're are able to grow the economy quicker and use the best technologies available to get us into a better situation. Sitting back and falling further behind means we'll still have to over spend in the future to catch up. So naive. Labor have already spent and borrowed a quarter of a billion dollars and the end result is a slow economy and growing unemployment. You can't grow the economy if it's shrinking, you need to stimulate the economy in areas where growth and increased productivity can directly occur, in the form of tax cuts to small and corporate business, PPL to get more women working, infrastructure and incentives to get welfare bludgers into work. Labors plan of "growing the economy" by borrowing billions to buy more wheelchairs, more calculators and a snail pace NBN is pathetic, it's a joke. Wheelchairs, calculators and NBNs all need to be manufactured = more manufacturing = economic stimulus. PPL = paying people to not produce anything = economic handbreak? Except for the indirect funding of childcare products I guess... much of which will probably be bought online from overseas. Also, most unemployed people are unemployed due to lack of opportunity, not lack of motivation. For those that are 'bludgers', I doubt an extra one-off payment is going to change much. The biggest risk to our economy is the increasing trend of both businesses and individuals spending money overseas... it would be worthwhile for both ALP and LNP supporters to focus on that and which party is going to solve that rather than clinging to old assumptions and stereotypes about Australian political parties. Each party has a plan to grow the economy and provide a certain level of government service... to be honest I don't know how anyone can think either of them are actually that strong that they'll hammer the weaknesses in the other.
|
|
|