The Australian Politics thread: Prime Minister Anthony Albanese


The Australian Politics thread: Prime Minister Anthony Albanese

Author
Message
rusty
rusty
World Class
World Class (6.2K reputation)World Class (6.2K reputation)World Class (6.2K reputation)World Class (6.2K reputation)World Class (6.2K reputation)World Class (6.2K reputation)World Class (6.2K reputation)World Class (6.2K reputation)World Class (6.2K reputation)World Class (6.2K reputation)World Class (6.2K reputation)

Group: Banned Members
Posts: 6.1K, Visits: 0
I can't stand GetUp! They are CLEARLY a mouthpiece of green/left wing politics pretending to be "independent". Why is it you have all these loony left wing groups can't be forthright about what their agenda is really about?
Edited
9 Years Ago by rusty
notorganic
notorganic
Legend
Legend (21K reputation)Legend (21K reputation)Legend (21K reputation)Legend (21K reputation)Legend (21K reputation)Legend (21K reputation)Legend (21K reputation)Legend (21K reputation)Legend (21K reputation)Legend (21K reputation)Legend (21K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 21K, Visits: 0
rusty wrote:
I can't stand GetUp! They are CLEARLY a mouthpiece of green/left wing politics pretending to be "independent". Why is it you have all these loony left wing groups can't be forthright about what their agenda is really about?


How do you feel about industry lobby groups that run ads for their own self interest under the guise of national & economic interest?

[youtube]CREUOpaVYJQ[/youtube]
Edited
9 Years Ago by notorganic
rusty
rusty
World Class
World Class (6.2K reputation)World Class (6.2K reputation)World Class (6.2K reputation)World Class (6.2K reputation)World Class (6.2K reputation)World Class (6.2K reputation)World Class (6.2K reputation)World Class (6.2K reputation)World Class (6.2K reputation)World Class (6.2K reputation)World Class (6.2K reputation)

Group: Banned Members
Posts: 6.1K, Visits: 0
notorganic wrote:
rusty wrote:
I can't stand GetUp! They are CLEARLY a mouthpiece of green/left wing politics pretending to be "independent". Why is it you have all these loony left wing groups can't be forthright about what their agenda is really about?


How do you feel about industry lobby groups that run ads for their own self interest under the guise of national & economic interest?

[youtube]CREUOpaVYJQ[/youtube]


C'mon mate they're obviously claiming to represent mining and exploration, nothing to do with political alignment.
Edited
9 Years Ago by rusty
Scoll
Scoll
Semi-Pro
Semi-Pro (1.6K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.6K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.6K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.6K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.6K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.6K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.6K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.6K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.6K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.6K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.6K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 1.6K, Visits: 0
rusty wrote:
I can't stand GetUp! They are CLEARLY a mouthpiece of green/left wing politics pretending to be "independent". Why is it you have all these loony left wing groups can't be forthright about what their agenda is really about?

Replace GetUp with Murdoch and green/left with right and you have what we've been force-fed by print news media. Murdoch doesn't claim allegiance any more than GetUp do.

What's good for the goose...
Edited
9 Years Ago by Scoll
notorganic
notorganic
Legend
Legend (21K reputation)Legend (21K reputation)Legend (21K reputation)Legend (21K reputation)Legend (21K reputation)Legend (21K reputation)Legend (21K reputation)Legend (21K reputation)Legend (21K reputation)Legend (21K reputation)Legend (21K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 21K, Visits: 0
rusty wrote:
notorganic wrote:
rusty wrote:
I can't stand GetUp! They are CLEARLY a mouthpiece of green/left wing politics pretending to be "independent". Why is it you have all these loony left wing groups can't be forthright about what their agenda is really about?


How do you feel about industry lobby groups that run ads for their own self interest under the guise of national & economic interest?

[youtube]CREUOpaVYJQ[/youtube]


C'mon mate they're obviously claiming to represent mining and exploration, nothing to do with political alignment.


"It could be your job
Or your superannuation
Or your electricity bill
The extra mining tax is going to affect Australians everywhere every day
All that's certain, somehow, some way there's a price to pay"


Yep, clearly only representing mining & exploration.
Edited
9 Years Ago by notorganic
rusty
rusty
World Class
World Class (6.2K reputation)World Class (6.2K reputation)World Class (6.2K reputation)World Class (6.2K reputation)World Class (6.2K reputation)World Class (6.2K reputation)World Class (6.2K reputation)World Class (6.2K reputation)World Class (6.2K reputation)World Class (6.2K reputation)World Class (6.2K reputation)

Group: Banned Members
Posts: 6.1K, Visits: 0
Scoll wrote:
rusty wrote:
I can't stand GetUp! They are CLEARLY a mouthpiece of green/left wing politics pretending to be "independent". Why is it you have all these loony left wing groups can't be forthright about what their agenda is really about?

Replace GetUp with Murdoch and green/left with right and you have what we've been force-fed by print news media. Murdoch doesn't claim allegiance any more than GetUp do.

What's good for the goose...


Murdoch is running a business not an "independent community advocacy organisation". Murdoch isn't claiming of be independent while Getup is and clearly isn't.
Edited
9 Years Ago by rusty
macktheknife
macktheknife
Legend
Legend (16K reputation)Legend (16K reputation)Legend (16K reputation)Legend (16K reputation)Legend (16K reputation)Legend (16K reputation)Legend (16K reputation)Legend (16K reputation)Legend (16K reputation)Legend (16K reputation)Legend (16K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 16K, Visits: 0
:lol:
Edited
9 Years Ago by macktheknife
rusty
rusty
World Class
World Class (6.2K reputation)World Class (6.2K reputation)World Class (6.2K reputation)World Class (6.2K reputation)World Class (6.2K reputation)World Class (6.2K reputation)World Class (6.2K reputation)World Class (6.2K reputation)World Class (6.2K reputation)World Class (6.2K reputation)World Class (6.2K reputation)

Group: Banned Members
Posts: 6.1K, Visits: 0
notorganic wrote:
rusty wrote:
notorganic wrote:
rusty wrote:
I can't stand GetUp! They are CLEARLY a mouthpiece of green/left wing politics pretending to be "independent". Why is it you have all these loony left wing groups can't be forthright about what their agenda is really about?


How do you feel about industry lobby groups that run ads for their own self interest under the guise of national & economic interest?

[youtube]CREUOpaVYJQ[/youtube]


C'mon mate they're obviously claiming to represent mining and exploration, nothing to do with political alignment.


"It could be your job
Or your superannuation
Or your electricity bill
The extra mining tax is going to affect Australians everywhere every day
All that's certain, somehow, some way there's a price to pay"


Yep, clearly only representing mining & exploration.


They are fighting the mining tax not the left wing.
Edited
9 Years Ago by rusty
Roar_Brisbane
Roar_Brisbane
Legend
Legend (14K reputation)Legend (14K reputation)Legend (14K reputation)Legend (14K reputation)Legend (14K reputation)Legend (14K reputation)Legend (14K reputation)Legend (14K reputation)Legend (14K reputation)Legend (14K reputation)Legend (14K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 14K, Visits: 0
[youtube]EmG1EK7mq-Q[/youtube]
[youtube]vVd7dQBExk0[/youtube]
Edited
9 Years Ago by Roar_Brisbane
batfink
batfink
Legend
Legend (10K reputation)Legend (10K reputation)Legend (10K reputation)Legend (10K reputation)Legend (10K reputation)Legend (10K reputation)Legend (10K reputation)Legend (10K reputation)Legend (10K reputation)Legend (10K reputation)Legend (10K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 9.9K, Visits: 0
paulbagzFC wrote:
batfink wrote:
paulbagzFC wrote:
batfink wrote:
imonfourfourtwo wrote:
batfink wrote:
paulbagzFC wrote:
batfink wrote:
paulbagzFC wrote:
batfink wrote:
paulbagzFC wrote:
rusty wrote:
macktheknife wrote:
Quote:
Just vote Liberal mate. Adequate, low risk fiscal policy is what saved our hides from the GFC, nothing Rudd did.


While this isn't my area, I'm fairly sure most experts view the stimulus packages, and the BER & Pink Batts builds as keeping the nation out of a recession.

If the Coalition was in power we'd have been given the same savage austerity that ravaged Europe.


We wouldn't have had austerity because our debt (or lackof) was at a manageable level, unlike those who were eventually hit the with austerity stick. The coalition supported the initial round of stimulus measures, spending to stimulate the economy is what all good governments should do. But $250 billion of profligate spending later and no significant rise in GDP you have to question what the government is doing with our money.


Same thing people wonder about the Stage Government Libs like Campbell Newmann and his pay rises.

-PB


but Gillard can have pay rises and its all ok


This is honestly the first I have heard of it. I doubt it happened, but it doesn't sound like it got the press attention that Can-do did.

Have you got a source batty?

-PB


surely you jest...!!


No I am not.

If you want to make claims, have sources to back those claims.

Other wise you are "just another liberal shitspeaker"

-PB



as oppoposed to a labor gimp.....:lol: :lol:

While the tone was unsavoury he does have a valid point, just an article to back up your claim would be nice.



has been provided by another person on the previous page and i have been found to be correct


Yeah another person. Wouldn't have been hard for you to post it and not act like a juvenile.

-PB


the other point is you profess to be so informed and you missed it due to your blatant bias towards the labor party


I don't profess to be anything hence why I asked to see the source because I obviously never saw it.

And as for your post above, you are a failure as a human being.

-PB


oh look a personal attack again...as soon as you are found wanting, you go for the personal attack.....

that i would say identifies you as a failure of a human being....

have a nice day ;)
Edited
9 Years Ago by batfink
batfink
batfink
Legend
Legend (10K reputation)Legend (10K reputation)Legend (10K reputation)Legend (10K reputation)Legend (10K reputation)Legend (10K reputation)Legend (10K reputation)Legend (10K reputation)Legend (10K reputation)Legend (10K reputation)Legend (10K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 9.9K, Visits: 0
Joffa wrote:
Pack of bloody lefty pinko commo's causing trouble if you ask me....



terrible that it should be banned.....unless it was the sight of a dog turd being played with...i was eating breakfast and it turned my guts...LOL


Edited
9 Years Ago by batfink
paulbagzFC
paulbagzFC
Legend
Legend (45K reputation)Legend (45K reputation)Legend (45K reputation)Legend (45K reputation)Legend (45K reputation)Legend (45K reputation)Legend (45K reputation)Legend (45K reputation)Legend (45K reputation)Legend (45K reputation)Legend (45K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 44K, Visits: 0
batfink wrote:
paulbagzFC wrote:
batfink wrote:
paulbagzFC wrote:
batfink wrote:
imonfourfourtwo wrote:
batfink wrote:
paulbagzFC wrote:
batfink wrote:
paulbagzFC wrote:
batfink wrote:
paulbagzFC wrote:
rusty wrote:
macktheknife wrote:
Quote:
Just vote Liberal mate. Adequate, low risk fiscal policy is what saved our hides from the GFC, nothing Rudd did.


While this isn't my area, I'm fairly sure most experts view the stimulus packages, and the BER & Pink Batts builds as keeping the nation out of a recession.

If the Coalition was in power we'd have been given the same savage austerity that ravaged Europe.


We wouldn't have had austerity because our debt (or lackof) was at a manageable level, unlike those who were eventually hit the with austerity stick. The coalition supported the initial round of stimulus measures, spending to stimulate the economy is what all good governments should do. But $250 billion of profligate spending later and no significant rise in GDP you have to question what the government is doing with our money.


Same thing people wonder about the Stage Government Libs like Campbell Newmann and his pay rises.

-PB


but Gillard can have pay rises and its all ok


This is honestly the first I have heard of it. I doubt it happened, but it doesn't sound like it got the press attention that Can-do did.

Have you got a source batty?

-PB


surely you jest...!!


No I am not.

If you want to make claims, have sources to back those claims.

Other wise you are "just another liberal shitspeaker"

-PB



as oppoposed to a labor gimp.....:lol: :lol:

While the tone was unsavoury he does have a valid point, just an article to back up your claim would be nice.



has been provided by another person on the previous page and i have been found to be correct


Yeah another person. Wouldn't have been hard for you to post it and not act like a juvenile.

-PB


the other point is you profess to be so informed and you missed it due to your blatant bias towards the labor party


I don't profess to be anything hence why I asked to see the source because I obviously never saw it.

And as for your post above, you are a failure as a human being.

-PB


oh look a personal attack again...as soon as you are found wanting, you go for the personal attack.....

that i would say identifies you as a failure of a human being....

have a nice day ;)


That wasn't a personal attack.

That was a well informed statement.

I don't go around calling people derogatory terms like "gimp".

But that's ok.

Life catches up to people like you.

Enjoy your day.

-PB

https://i.imgur.com/batge7K.jpg

Edited
9 Years Ago by paulbagzFC
batfink
batfink
Legend
Legend (10K reputation)Legend (10K reputation)Legend (10K reputation)Legend (10K reputation)Legend (10K reputation)Legend (10K reputation)Legend (10K reputation)Legend (10K reputation)Legend (10K reputation)Legend (10K reputation)Legend (10K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 9.9K, Visits: 0
paulbagzFC wrote:
batfink wrote:
paulbagzFC wrote:
batfink wrote:
paulbagzFC wrote:
batfink wrote:
imonfourfourtwo wrote:
batfink wrote:
paulbagzFC wrote:
batfink wrote:
paulbagzFC wrote:
batfink wrote:
paulbagzFC wrote:
rusty wrote:
macktheknife wrote:
Quote:
Just vote Liberal mate. Adequate, low risk fiscal policy is what saved our hides from the GFC, nothing Rudd did.


While this isn't my area, I'm fairly sure most experts view the stimulus packages, and the BER & Pink Batts builds as keeping the nation out of a recession.

If the Coalition was in power we'd have been given the same savage austerity that ravaged Europe.


We wouldn't have had austerity because our debt (or lackof) was at a manageable level, unlike those who were eventually hit the with austerity stick. The coalition supported the initial round of stimulus measures, spending to stimulate the economy is what all good governments should do. But $250 billion of profligate spending later and no significant rise in GDP you have to question what the government is doing with our money.


Same thing people wonder about the Stage Government Libs like Campbell Newmann and his pay rises.

-PB


but Gillard can have pay rises and its all ok


This is honestly the first I have heard of it. I doubt it happened, but it doesn't sound like it got the press attention that Can-do did.

Have you got a source batty?

-PB


surely you jest...!!


No I am not.

If you want to make claims, have sources to back those claims.

Other wise you are "just another liberal shitspeaker"

-PB



as oppoposed to a labor gimp.....:lol: :lol:

While the tone was unsavoury he does have a valid point, just an article to back up your claim would be nice.



has been provided by another person on the previous page and i have been found to be correct


Yeah another person. Wouldn't have been hard for you to post it and not act like a juvenile.

-PB


the other point is you profess to be so informed and you missed it due to your blatant bias towards the labor party


I don't profess to be anything hence why I asked to see the source because I obviously never saw it.

And as for your post above, you are a failure as a human being.

-PB


oh look a personal attack again...as soon as you are found wanting, you go for the personal attack.....

that i would say identifies you as a failure of a human being....

have a nice day ;)


That wasn't a personal attack.

That was a well informed statement.

I don't go around calling people derogatory terms like "gimp".

But that's ok.

Life catches up to people like you.

Enjoy your day.

-PB


mine was also a well informed comment......and you don't use derogatory terms????

gorgeous day out there in gods country....;)
Edited
9 Years Ago by batfink
pv4
pv4
Legend
Legend (13K reputation)Legend (13K reputation)Legend (13K reputation)Legend (13K reputation)Legend (13K reputation)Legend (13K reputation)Legend (13K reputation)Legend (13K reputation)Legend (13K reputation)Legend (13K reputation)Legend (13K reputation)

Group: Moderators
Posts: 12K, Visits: 0
batfink wrote:
paulbagzFC wrote:
batfink wrote:
paulbagzFC wrote:
batfink wrote:
paulbagzFC wrote:
batfink wrote:
imonfourfourtwo wrote:
batfink wrote:
paulbagzFC wrote:
batfink wrote:
paulbagzFC wrote:
batfink wrote:
paulbagzFC wrote:
rusty wrote:
macktheknife wrote:
Quote:
Just vote Liberal mate. Adequate, low risk fiscal policy is what saved our hides from the GFC, nothing Rudd did.


While this isn't my area, I'm fairly sure most experts view the stimulus packages, and the BER & Pink Batts builds as keeping the nation out of a recession.

If the Coalition was in power we'd have been given the same savage austerity that ravaged Europe.


We wouldn't have had austerity because our debt (or lackof) was at a manageable level, unlike those who were eventually hit the with austerity stick. The coalition supported the initial round of stimulus measures, spending to stimulate the economy is what all good governments should do. But $250 billion of profligate spending later and no significant rise in GDP you have to question what the government is doing with our money.


Same thing people wonder about the Stage Government Libs like Campbell Newmann and his pay rises.

-PB


but Gillard can have pay rises and its all ok


This is honestly the first I have heard of it. I doubt it happened, but it doesn't sound like it got the press attention that Can-do did.

Have you got a source batty?

-PB


surely you jest...!!


No I am not.

If you want to make claims, have sources to back those claims.

Other wise you are "just another liberal shitspeaker"

-PB



as oppoposed to a labor gimp.....:lol: :lol:

While the tone was unsavoury he does have a valid point, just an article to back up your claim would be nice.



has been provided by another person on the previous page and i have been found to be correct


Yeah another person. Wouldn't have been hard for you to post it and not act like a juvenile.

-PB


the other point is you profess to be so informed and you missed it due to your blatant bias towards the labor party


I don't profess to be anything hence why I asked to see the source because I obviously never saw it.

And as for your post above, you are a failure as a human being.

-PB


oh look a personal attack again...as soon as you are found wanting, you go for the personal attack.....

that i would say identifies you as a failure of a human being....

have a nice day ;)


That wasn't a personal attack.

That was a well informed statement.

I don't go around calling people derogatory terms like "gimp".

But that's ok.

Life catches up to people like you.

Enjoy your day.

-PB


mine was also a well informed comment......and you don't use derogatory terms????

gorgeous day out there in gods country....;)


That pyramid!!!
Edited
9 Years Ago by pv4
thupercoach
thupercoach
World Class
World Class (8.4K reputation)World Class (8.4K reputation)World Class (8.4K reputation)World Class (8.4K reputation)World Class (8.4K reputation)World Class (8.4K reputation)World Class (8.4K reputation)World Class (8.4K reputation)World Class (8.4K reputation)World Class (8.4K reputation)World Class (8.4K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 8.3K, Visits: 0
Can we declare the election closed? Noone's got anything to say anymore, it's all "you're a cnut - no you're a cnut!" now...

I was done weeks ago...
Edited
9 Years Ago by thupercoach
batfink
batfink
Legend
Legend (10K reputation)Legend (10K reputation)Legend (10K reputation)Legend (10K reputation)Legend (10K reputation)Legend (10K reputation)Legend (10K reputation)Legend (10K reputation)Legend (10K reputation)Legend (10K reputation)Legend (10K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 9.9K, Visits: 0
thupercoach wrote:
Can we declare the election closed? Noone's got anything to say anymore, it's all "you're a cnut - no you're a cnut!" now...

I was done weeks ago...



it's all just a shit fight...and the end result is apathy.....
Edited
9 Years Ago by batfink
paulbagzFC
paulbagzFC
Legend
Legend (45K reputation)Legend (45K reputation)Legend (45K reputation)Legend (45K reputation)Legend (45K reputation)Legend (45K reputation)Legend (45K reputation)Legend (45K reputation)Legend (45K reputation)Legend (45K reputation)Legend (45K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 44K, Visits: 0
thupercoach wrote:
Can we declare the election closed? Noone's got anything to say anymore, it's all "you're a cnut - no you're a cnut!" now...

I was done weeks ago...


Was done months ago.

Hell even a years ago.

-PB

https://i.imgur.com/batge7K.jpg

Edited
9 Years Ago by paulbagzFC
notorganic
notorganic
Legend
Legend (21K reputation)Legend (21K reputation)Legend (21K reputation)Legend (21K reputation)Legend (21K reputation)Legend (21K reputation)Legend (21K reputation)Legend (21K reputation)Legend (21K reputation)Legend (21K reputation)Legend (21K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 21K, Visits: 0
Can we go back to laughing at Clive Palmer please

[youtube]r_uJ4mfSi1M[/youtube]
Edited
9 Years Ago by notorganic
afromanGT
afromanGT
Legend
Legend (77K reputation)Legend (77K reputation)Legend (77K reputation)Legend (77K reputation)Legend (77K reputation)Legend (77K reputation)Legend (77K reputation)Legend (77K reputation)Legend (77K reputation)Legend (77K reputation)Legend (77K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 77K, Visits: 0
batfink wrote:
decided to drop to your level....;)

You lack the capacity to elevate yourself high enough for it to be physically possible for you to 'drop' to my level.
Quote:
Re Clive Palmer - I don't mind more than a few things his party stands for but Palmer has no staying power. He'll be out of politics by 2016.

Some of the things he says are interesting, others are completely delusional. Like the idea that private industry is going to invest in developing infrastructure in exchange for tax cuts. We all know that's bullshit.
Edited
9 Years Ago by afromanGT
thupercoach
thupercoach
World Class
World Class (8.4K reputation)World Class (8.4K reputation)World Class (8.4K reputation)World Class (8.4K reputation)World Class (8.4K reputation)World Class (8.4K reputation)World Class (8.4K reputation)World Class (8.4K reputation)World Class (8.4K reputation)World Class (8.4K reputation)World Class (8.4K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 8.3K, Visits: 0
notorganic wrote:
Can we go back to laughing at Clive Palmer please

[youtube]r_uJ4mfSi1M[/youtube]
Good god...

Does he realise that even if he were right and she is a Chinese spy he still comes across as an utter nutjob?

Three years tops.
Edited
9 Years Ago by thupercoach
batfink
batfink
Legend
Legend (10K reputation)Legend (10K reputation)Legend (10K reputation)Legend (10K reputation)Legend (10K reputation)Legend (10K reputation)Legend (10K reputation)Legend (10K reputation)Legend (10K reputation)Legend (10K reputation)Legend (10K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 9.9K, Visits: 0
afromanGT wrote:
batfink wrote:
decided to drop to your level....;)

You lack the capacity to elevate yourself high enough for it to be physically possible for you to 'drop' to my level.
Quote:
Re Clive Palmer - I don't mind more than a few things his party stands for but Palmer has no staying power. He'll be out of politics by 2016.

Some of the things he says are interesting, others are completely delusional. Like the idea that private industry is going to invest in developing infrastructure in exchange for tax cuts. We all know that's bullshit.



lol....sorry pal...nice try...;)
Edited
9 Years Ago by batfink
StiflersMom
StiflersMom
Legend
Legend (13K reputation)Legend (13K reputation)Legend (13K reputation)Legend (13K reputation)Legend (13K reputation)Legend (13K reputation)Legend (13K reputation)Legend (13K reputation)Legend (13K reputation)Legend (13K reputation)Legend (13K reputation)

Group: Moderators
Posts: 12K, Visits: 0
After that extraordinary outburst I've decided if he has someone in my seat standing for the house of Reps, then I'm voting 1 Clive and Sex party for the senate.
Edited
9 Years Ago by StiflersMom
paulbagzFC
paulbagzFC
Legend
Legend (45K reputation)Legend (45K reputation)Legend (45K reputation)Legend (45K reputation)Legend (45K reputation)Legend (45K reputation)Legend (45K reputation)Legend (45K reputation)Legend (45K reputation)Legend (45K reputation)Legend (45K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 44K, Visits: 0
StiflersMom wrote:
After that extraordinary outburst I've decided if he has someone in my seat standing for the house of Reps, then I'm voting 1 Clive and Sex party for the senate.


He should. Pretty sure he has a member in every seat.

-PB

https://i.imgur.com/batge7K.jpg

Edited
9 Years Ago by paulbagzFC
bovs
bovs
Semi-Pro
Semi-Pro (1.7K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.7K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.7K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.7K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.7K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.7K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.7K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.7K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.7K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.7K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.7K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 1.7K, Visits: 0
StiflersMom wrote:
After that extraordinary outburst I've decided if he has someone in my seat standing for the house of Reps, then I'm voting 1 Clive and Sex party for the senate.


He's running a candidate in *every* seat...

But if you are thinking about voting for Clive, you really should at least consider the article to which he was referring in that interview because it paints a pretty ugly picture.

I felt like that interview he gave with Stefanovic has basically ruined him... I could've seen him getting around 5% nationwide plus maybe winning 1 or 2 seats in the Senate... that would've been enough for preferences from his candidates to have swayed a number of seats one way or the other in terms of ALP vs Libs.

Now anyone who was thinking about him as a protest vote will likely see him as no less loopy than the extremist parties... they'll probably go to Greens or Family First instead. At best Clive *might* get 1 seat in the Senate from Qld... probably between him and Katter to take a seat off the ALP who are dead in the water up there it seems.


I still reckon there's a good chance for as many as 5 or 6 minor party candidates to get into the Senate nationwide on top of the Greens... so Abbott's going to face a tough job if they end up being anything other than generally sympathetic parties like Family First or Rise Up.
Edited
9 Years Ago by bovs
StiflersMom
StiflersMom
Legend
Legend (13K reputation)Legend (13K reputation)Legend (13K reputation)Legend (13K reputation)Legend (13K reputation)Legend (13K reputation)Legend (13K reputation)Legend (13K reputation)Legend (13K reputation)Legend (13K reputation)Legend (13K reputation)

Group: Moderators
Posts: 12K, Visits: 0
Quote:
GetUp!
Why we were banned
This is the ad that got banned by the commercial networks. Watch and read more below.

[youtube]grqp-JQMFuM[/youtube]

This election campaign, News Corp has used the front pages of its tabloids to launch aggressive political campaigns against one side of politics, while failing to scrutinise the other.

That's why we created this ad. We want to call News Corp's campaign out for what it it: biased crap. We want to show there is a movement of Australians who aren't going to stand idly by while one man tries to tell an entire nation how to vote.

Together, GetUp members raised hundreds of thousands of dollars to make a massive ad buy, standing up to News Corp on millions of TV screens across the country.

So why aren't you seeing the ad on tv?

Turns out, not everyone is as keen to stand up to a billionaire media mogul as we are.

After GetUp members chipped in money to put this on air we immediately made bookings.

Channel 10 said outright on the phone that they wouldn't run the ad because it criticises another media outlet. Lachlan Murdoch is on the company's board. We're sure the two are totally unrelated.
Channel 7 refused the ad because "the creative execution was considered distasteful and potentially offensive to our audience, so we have decided to make a stand." So noble. We created a new version of the ad with the 'offensive' bits blurred out. They didn't respond.
Channel 9 at least approved the ad, and ran it for four days. In fact, 615,800 people have already seen it on 9 across Brisbane. On Monday, they pulled the ad, and blamed it on a "coding error," saying it never should have run. Whoopsadaisey.

That's all three of Australia's major commercial networks banding together to suppress media criticism. What's more, it's happening in an election period where Australians ought to have the freedom to express their opinions and to criticise and speak truth to power.

We have lodged a complaint with the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission.

In the last 18 hours, other media have cottoned-on and run with the story. They've created a media storm that's seen us on the front page of The Age and Sydney Morning Herald websites, run on ABC and SBS, and much more. The story is only gathering momentum.

Because of the network's refusal to play fair, the ad is likely to be seen, discussed, and shared by more people than if the original ad buy had have gone ahead.

You can see some of the coverage on ABC and The Age here. Also view this cracking piece from The Conversation

Fighting for a free, fair and independent media is something GetUp has done since day one. We're not about to stop.




https://www.getup.org.au/campaigns/media/murdoch-ad-update/why-we-were-banned
Edited
9 Years Ago by StiflersMom
paulbagzFC
paulbagzFC
Legend
Legend (45K reputation)Legend (45K reputation)Legend (45K reputation)Legend (45K reputation)Legend (45K reputation)Legend (45K reputation)Legend (45K reputation)Legend (45K reputation)Legend (45K reputation)Legend (45K reputation)Legend (45K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 44K, Visits: 0
LOL!

Ruddies just burned Sky News :lol:

Having a swole trole this arvo @ TPC.

-PB

https://i.imgur.com/batge7K.jpg

Edited
9 Years Ago by paulbagzFC
paulbagzFC
paulbagzFC
Legend
Legend (45K reputation)Legend (45K reputation)Legend (45K reputation)Legend (45K reputation)Legend (45K reputation)Legend (45K reputation)Legend (45K reputation)Legend (45K reputation)Legend (45K reputation)Legend (45K reputation)Legend (45K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 44K, Visits: 0
bovs wrote:
StiflersMom wrote:
After that extraordinary outburst I've decided if he has someone in my seat standing for the house of Reps, then I'm voting 1 Clive and Sex party for the senate.


He's running a candidate in *every* seat...

But if you are thinking about voting for Clive, you really should at least consider the article to which he was referring in that interview because it paints a pretty ugly picture.

I felt like that interview he gave with Stefanovic has basically ruined him... I could've seen him getting around 5% nationwide plus maybe winning 1 or 2 seats in the Senate... that would've been enough for preferences from his candidates to have swayed a number of seats one way or the other in terms of ALP vs Libs.

Now anyone who was thinking about him as a protest vote will likely see him as no less loopy than the extremist parties... they'll probably go to Greens or Family First instead. At best Clive *might* get 1 seat in the Senate from Qld... probably between him and Katter to take a seat off the ALP who are dead in the water up there it seems.


I still reckon there's a good chance for as many as 5 or 6 minor party candidates to get into the Senate nationwide on top of the Greens... so Abbott's going to face a tough job if they end up being anything other than generally sympathetic parties like Family First or Rise Up.


That's if they watch The Morning Show and read news.com.au :lol:

-PB

https://i.imgur.com/batge7K.jpg

Edited
9 Years Ago by paulbagzFC
Joffa
Joffa
Legend
Legend (86K reputation)Legend (86K reputation)Legend (86K reputation)Legend (86K reputation)Legend (86K reputation)Legend (86K reputation)Legend (86K reputation)Legend (86K reputation)Legend (86K reputation)Legend (86K reputation)Legend (86K reputation)

Group: Moderators
Posts: 66K, Visits: 0

Australia’s Abbott set to inherit economy others would envy
Thursday, 05 September, 2013, 10:45am
Wayne Cole

Australia’s presumptive prime minister, Tony Abbott, is set to inherit a slowing economy, rising unemployment and a budget in the red. Yet look out to a three-year election horizon, and the view is a lot better.

Abbott’s conservative Liberal-National coalition appears to be a shoe-in at elections this weekend, ending six years of Labor rule, and all the talk has been of the challenges he faces.

Chief among those are worries about a substandard economy and the pressure it’s putting on public coffers -- fears which have in large part been fanned by Abbott’s coalition while in opposition. Indeed, the last recession was more than two decades ago and government debt is relatively low and manageable.

And any economic pain is likely to be concentrated in the near term, where blame can be conveniently laid at the feet of the former government.

It also helps that the starting point is not as bad as many feared. Government figures out this week showed the economy grew by 0.6 per cent in the June quarter and a steady 2.6 per cent for the year, defying speculation of a much deeper slowdown.

That is short of the 3.25 to 3.5 per cent pace that Australians have come to think of as “normal”, but the economy is still consistently faster than any other developed nation.

Most economists expect growth to stay around 2.5 per cent for a few more quarters, but further out things are brighter.

For instance, Reuters’ latest poll of global banks found they expected economic growth to quicken to 3.1 per cent over next year.

The Reserve Bank of Australia (RBA) is confident growth will accelerate to an above-average pace by 2015 -- its forecasts even stretch as high as 4.25 per cent.

With another election not due until 2016, such an outcome would put Abbott in the driving seat to win a second term.

Developments offshore should also augur well for Abbott, with a marked improvement in economic news from the rich world in the past month or so.

The United States has gained enough traction that the Federal Reserve can consider reining back on stimulus, while Europe has emerged from recession.

Japan has boasted its best growth in years, and fears of a hard landing for China have faded in the face of better data on manufacturing and trade.

The latter is particularly good news for Australia as the Asian giant takes fully a third of its exports and is by far the biggest consumer of its iron ore, a A$60 billion-a-year (HK$424.7 billion) boon to its trade accounts.

Indeed, figures out Thursday showed no slacking in demand for the ore. Australia’s Port Hedland, which handles about a fifth of the global seaborne market for the steel-making material, reported shipments to China rose 9 per cent in August, up a hefty 33 per cent on the same month last year.

“Finally, all the evidence now points to a renaissance of growth in the advanced economies,” said Scott Haslem, an economist at UBS.

He noted that while instability in some emerging markets, such as India and Brazil, had garnered a lot of headlines, those countries accounted for only 12 to 13 per cent of global output.

In comparison, the economies that were stabilising, which includes China, were four times larger at 55 per cent of output.

“This suggests greater upside risks, than downside risks, to global growth from here.”

Another timely blessing for Abbott has been the decline in the Australian dollar. For almost all of the last three years of Labor government it had been punishingly high, hollowing out manufacturing and crimping export earnings.

Since most of Australia’s resource exports are priced in US dollars, a high local currency lessens returns to miners, and so profits and tax receipts.

Fortunately for Abbott, then, that the currency has fallen by 14 per cent since April, delivering a major windfall to miners and the next government’s bottom line.

The RBA has made much of research that implies a 10 per cent decline in the currency will stimulate economic growth by between 0.5 and 1 percentage point over two years.

“The Aussie is once again playing its traditional role as an income buffer,” said Michael Blythe, chief economist at Commonwealth Bank of Australia.

“The main beneficiaries of this income buffering should be corporate profits and government tax revenues related to that profit story.”

Having spent the past three years excoriating the Labor government for running deficits and accusing it of taking debt to crisis levels, Abbott has since abandoned all pretence of trying to get into the black in his first term of office.

Net government debt is expected to peak at 13 per cent of GDP in the year ending June 2015, and the budget deficit for the current fiscal year is forecast at US$30 billion, equal to 1.9 per cent of gross domestic product.

Abbott’s earlier stance on the deficit had raised the prospect of a dose of European-style austerity, which is now widely seen as having needlessly deepened the recession in Europe and actually only added to government debt problems.

Such was the threat that it moved US Nobel Prize-winning economist Joseph Stiglitz to write a warning piece for the Sydney Morning Herald newspaper this week.

“The political spotlight has fallen on the perceived problem of government debt, with alarming proposals to bring austerity ‘down under’,” Stiglitz wrote.

“Proposals for substantial budget cuts seem particularly misplaced at this time given that Australia’s economy is confronting new global challenges.”

Yet he needn’t have worried, because a return to budget surpluses now sounds more of an aspiration than a target.

Instead, Abbott conjured up a 10-year timetable to reach a “believable surplus”, a distant goal that would also require his party to win three elections in a row, and told ABC television he was aiming for relatively modest savings.

“I don’t think anyone is going to think at the end of this week, ‘My God, there is this massive fiscal squeeze coming.’ If anything, what they will think is there has been a massive scare campaign,” Abbott reassured viewers.

Reuters

http://www.scmp.com/business/economy/article/1303800/australias-abbott-set-inherit-economy-others-would-envy?
Edited
9 Years Ago by Joffa
Joffa
Joffa
Legend
Legend (86K reputation)Legend (86K reputation)Legend (86K reputation)Legend (86K reputation)Legend (86K reputation)Legend (86K reputation)Legend (86K reputation)Legend (86K reputation)Legend (86K reputation)Legend (86K reputation)Legend (86K reputation)

Group: Moderators
Posts: 66K, Visits: 0
I thought we were in a state of budgetary crisis?
Edited
9 Years Ago by Joffa
Glory Recruit
Glory Recruit
Legend
Legend (14K reputation)Legend (14K reputation)Legend (14K reputation)Legend (14K reputation)Legend (14K reputation)Legend (14K reputation)Legend (14K reputation)Legend (14K reputation)Legend (14K reputation)Legend (14K reputation)Legend (14K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 13K, Visits: 0
StiflersMom wrote:
After that extraordinary outburst I've decided if he has someone in my seat standing for the house of Reps, then I'm voting 1 Clive and Sex party for the senate.


I voted sex party in the senate:)
Edited
9 Years Ago by Iridium1010
GO


Select a Forum....























Inside Sport


Search