433
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 6.7K,
Visits: 0
|
Insanity: doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results. - Albert Einstein
If we go in an liberate the middle-east, this time it will be different... r-right?
Fucking hell our government is stupid. The ISIS beheading videos are just bait to get the people mad, and so the government responds by sending troops in. This inevitably leads to more hatred of the West in the middle-east, and more terror groups. The cycle continues once again, and ISIS have successful duped the West into another drawn out and unwinnable war.
|
|
|
|
batfink
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 9.9K,
Visits: 0
|
433 wrote:Insanity: doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results. - Albert Einstein
If we go in an liberate the middle-east, this time it will be different... r-right?
Fucking hell our government is stupid. The ISIS beheading videos are just bait to get the people mad, and so the government responds by sending troops in. This inevitably leads to more hatred of the West in the middle-east, and more terror groups. The cycle continues once again, and ISIS have successful duped the West into another drawn out and unwinnable war. your right.....just newk the whole place and start from scratch.....easy ;) ;)
|
|
|
433
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 6.7K,
Visits: 0
|
batfink wrote:433 wrote:Insanity: doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results. - Albert Einstein
If we go in an liberate the middle-east, this time it will be different... r-right?
Fucking hell our government is stupid. The ISIS beheading videos are just bait to get the people mad, and so the government responds by sending troops in. This inevitably leads to more hatred of the West in the middle-east, and more terror groups. The cycle continues once again, and ISIS have successful duped the West into another drawn out and unwinnable war. your right.....just newk the whole place and start from scratch.....easy ;) ;) I know you're being sarcastic, but the middle-east is really an unsalvagable situation. We should just cut our losses, leave and let them deal with their own problems.
|
|
|
Fourfiveone
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 1.1K,
Visits: 0
|
batfink wrote:Fourfiveone wrote:batfink wrote:Shatter wrote:rusty wrote:mcjules wrote:batfink wrote:mcjules wrote:$400 million a year to get involved. Best use of our funds in a "budget emergency"? but of course when Labor spend on military incursions it's AOK....;) roght How many times do we have to go over that just because I and others here disagree with something the LNP is doing (admittedly it's pretty much everything at the moment) does not instantly mean we support the Labor party's policy? If you can let me know I can get it over with a bit quicker and we can all move on ;) Military involvement and it's associated costs is something very different from the budget situation. We don't get involved in military matters unless it's very serious. In this case the humanitarian and terrorism threat ISIS represents to the west and wider world make it vitally important that we stamp it out, and it should be considered an investment In our long term economic and national security by eliminating primitive threats to peace and order.The budget situation is more to do with wasteful spending where you have too much money going out on things like Medicare and school kids bonus and not enough coming in to pay for it all, which creates an imbalance which adds to the debt burden, which affects things like the cost of borrowing and sees more money get paid out on interest rather than spent on areas where it's really needed. What do you think would happen if we actually did stamp out ISIS? I could name at least a half dozen splinter groups that are ready to move in. They are not as resourced but some of them are just as brutal. The perpetual bombing of the Middle East by the West is creating generation after generation of terrorists. It's abundantly clear that the current strategy is ad hoc and there is no foreseeable end game. I can understand the desire for intervention but I currently cannot see any benefit for it. Also, your reasoning that continued bombing will create a safer west / world has zero basis in reality. I don't know when this narrative began but blowback is a well understood and established phenomenon. I really don't understand how people fathom that bombing ISIS will make us safer in the West. Why would further attacks de-radicalise people? If people believe there are radicals in Australia, why would you think this would make them less likely to attack home targets? People need to stop buying in to the narrative that is sold to them and just think logically about it for a minute. Edited by Shatter: 17/9/2014 12:22:04 AM some huge assumptions here........have you considered the 100,000 displaced people who are running from ISIS??? losing their families, houses, lives to these people??? So what? This generation has been in the making since 2001. We planted the seed of hatred why do we have to go back and water it some more? Has the fact that that's what they want missed your attention? Are you 10? Do you need glasses? Is there a hole in your brain? Does your stupidity know no bounds? so what? are you saying we only have terrorists and extremists due to and since the Iraq war???? No. You're the extremist supporting Isis's agenda. Anyone who supports any war short of defending our or our allies sovereignty is utterly stupid and brainwashed beyond measure. We can't stop the extremists in the Middle East but we can stop the extremists and their ilk in Australia.
|
|
|
paulbagzFC
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 44K,
Visits: 0
|
433 wrote:Insanity: doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results. - Albert Einstein
If we go in an liberate the middle-east, this time it will be different... r-right?
Fucking hell our government is stupid. The ISIS beheading videos are just bait to get the people mad, and so the government responds by sending troops in. This inevitably leads to more hatred of the West in the middle-east, and more terror groups. The cycle continues once again, and ISIS have successful duped the West into another drawn out and unwinnable war. This. But not really our Gumnut's call though, soon as USA was arking up we were always going to be involved. Twitter should also be held responsible for giving these kents a soapbox to stand on and leaving the tweets/links to vids up for far longer than they should be. -PB
|
|
|
rusty
|
|
Group: Banned Members
Posts: 6.1K,
Visits: 0
|
433 wrote:Insanity: doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results. - Albert Einstein
If we go in an liberate the middle-east, this time it will be different... r-right?
Fucking hell our government is stupid. The ISIS beheading videos are just bait to get the people mad, and so the government responds by sending troops in. This inevitably leads to more hatred of the West in the middle-east, and more terror groups. The cycle continues once again, and ISIS have successful duped the West into another drawn out and unwinnable war. Oh I see so ISIS are deliberately trying to wind up the west so the yanks will go in there with stealth bombers and blow them to a million bits? It's not like by the west being tolerant and turning the other cheek ISIS will go "oh darn, they're not dropping bombs on us how on earth are we going to execute our plans to destroy the west and take over the world now :(" it doesn't matter what we do they're going to hate us regardless, and there's always going to be extremists and the only rational way to deal with that is with force.
|
|
|
notorganic
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 21K,
Visits: 0
|
rusty wrote:Oh I see so ISIS are deliberately trying to wind up the west so the yanks will go in there with stealth bombers and blow them to a million bits? Yes. Idiot.
|
|
|
paulbagzFC
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 44K,
Visits: 0
|
rusty wrote:433 wrote:Insanity: doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results. - Albert Einstein
If we go in an liberate the middle-east, this time it will be different... r-right?
Fucking hell our government is stupid. The ISIS beheading videos are just bait to get the people mad, and so the government responds by sending troops in. This inevitably leads to more hatred of the West in the middle-east, and more terror groups. The cycle continues once again, and ISIS have successful duped the West into another drawn out and unwinnable war. Oh I see so ISIS are deliberately trying to wind up the west so the yanks will go in there with stealth bombers and blow them to a million bits? It's not like by the west being tolerant and turning the other cheek ISIS will go "oh darn, they're not dropping bombs on us how on earth are we going to execute our plans to destroy the west and take over the world now :(" it doesn't matter what we do they're going to hate us regardless, and there's always going to be extremists and the only rational way to deal with that is with force. Until they draw us into a ground war which will not work. Bombing them is all good until the retreat into a city. -PB
|
|
|
mcjules
|
|
Group: Moderators
Posts: 8.4K,
Visits: 0
|
I reckon it could be pretty hard at times to get support to fight what many would see as "their own people". Bringing a foreign force into play would do wonders to galvanize people. Edited by mcjules: 17/9/2014 10:15:26 PM
Insert Gertjan Verbeek gifs here
|
|
|
rusty
|
|
Group: Banned Members
Posts: 6.1K,
Visits: 0
|
Shatter wrote:rusty wrote:mcjules wrote:batfink wrote:mcjules wrote:$400 million a year to get involved. Best use of our funds in a "budget emergency"? but of course when Labor spend on military incursions it's AOK....;) roght How many times do we have to go over that just because I and others here disagree with something the LNP is doing (admittedly it's pretty much everything at the moment) does not instantly mean we support the Labor party's policy? If you can let me know I can get it over with a bit quicker and we can all move on ;) Military involvement and it's associated costs is something very different from the budget situation. We don't get involved in military matters unless it's very serious. In this case the humanitarian and terrorism threat ISIS represents to the west and wider world make it vitally important that we stamp it out, and it should be considered an investment In our long term economic and national security by eliminating primitive threats to peace and order.The budget situation is more to do with wasteful spending where you have too much money going out on things like Medicare and school kids bonus and not enough coming in to pay for it all, which creates an imbalance which adds to the debt burden, which affects things like the cost of borrowing and sees more money get paid out on interest rather than spent on areas where it's really needed. What do you think would happen if we actually did stamp out ISIS? I could name at least a half dozen splinter groups that are ready to move in. They are not as resourced but some of them are just as brutal. The perpetual bombing of the Middle East by the West is creating generation after generation of terrorists. It's abundantly clear that the current strategy is ad hoc and there is no foreseeable end game. I can understand the desire for intervention but I currently cannot see any benefit for it. Also, your reasoning that continued bombing will create a safer west / world has zero basis in reality. I don't know when this narrative began but blowback is a well understood and established phenomenon. I really don't understand how people fathom that bombing ISIS will make us safer in the West. Why would further attacks de-radicalise people? If people believe there are radicals in Australia, why would you think this would make them less likely to attack home targets? People need to stop buying in to the narrative that is sold to them and just think logically about it for a minute.i] While it's true there blowback there's also another thing called momentum and if ISIS are just allowed to continue unimpeded their power and influence will only grow rather than contract. It is not logical to think the terrorist threat will go away by allowing them to freely go around indiscriminately killing people and spreading Islam by the sword, if anything it will reinforce the notion that terrorism and violence is the best best way to achieve their objectives of creating an Islamic state. There's always the risk by getting involved you may further radicalise some disaffected people but you do this anyway by doing the nothing and allowing ISIS free reign to spread their radical ideas and western hate. It will only spur them on even further and eventually they would set up cells on western soil and use the threat of terrorism to cast down any attempt at shutting them down. I know it's uncouth and unfashionable and all but sometimes the best way to deal with a problem is to drop bombs. Also ignoring the slaughter of ethnic and religious minorities due to the fear of a terrorist attack is a bit of a defeatist attitude.
|
|
|
rusty
|
|
Group: Banned Members
Posts: 6.1K,
Visits: 0
|
notorganic wrote:rusty wrote:Oh I see so ISIS are deliberately trying to wind up the west so the yanks will go in there with stealth bombers and blow them to a million bits? Yes. Idiot. Ah I see it's all part of a super clever grandmaster plan to take over the world, by getting bombs dropped on them. They are so cunning!
|
|
|
notorganic
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 21K,
Visits: 0
|
rusty wrote:notorganic wrote:rusty wrote:Oh I see so ISIS are deliberately trying to wind up the west so the yanks will go in there with stealth bombers and blow them to a million bits? Yes. Idiot. Ah I see it's all part of a super clever grandmaster plan to take over the world, by getting bombs dropped on them. They are so cunning! 13 years since 9/11. They're clearly moving backwards.
|
|
|
batfink
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 9.9K,
Visits: 0
|
Fourfiveone wrote:batfink wrote:Fourfiveone wrote:batfink wrote:Shatter wrote:rusty wrote:mcjules wrote:batfink wrote:mcjules wrote:$400 million a year to get involved. Best use of our funds in a "budget emergency"? but of course when Labor spend on military incursions it's AOK....;) roght How many times do we have to go over that just because I and others here disagree with something the LNP is doing (admittedly it's pretty much everything at the moment) does not instantly mean we support the Labor party's policy? If you can let me know I can get it over with a bit quicker and we can all move on ;) Military involvement and it's associated costs is something very different from the budget situation. We don't get involved in military matters unless it's very serious. In this case the humanitarian and terrorism threat ISIS represents to the west and wider world make it vitally important that we stamp it out, and it should be considered an investment In our long term economic and national security by eliminating primitive threats to peace and order.The budget situation is more to do with wasteful spending where you have too much money going out on things like Medicare and school kids bonus and not enough coming in to pay for it all, which creates an imbalance which adds to the debt burden, which affects things like the cost of borrowing and sees more money get paid out on interest rather than spent on areas where it's really needed. What do you think would happen if we actually did stamp out ISIS? I could name at least a half dozen splinter groups that are ready to move in. They are not as resourced but some of them are just as brutal. The perpetual bombing of the Middle East by the West is creating generation after generation of terrorists. It's abundantly clear that the current strategy is ad hoc and there is no foreseeable end game. I can understand the desire for intervention but I currently cannot see any benefit for it. Also, your reasoning that continued bombing will create a safer west / world has zero basis in reality. I don't know when this narrative began but blowback is a well understood and established phenomenon. I really don't understand how people fathom that bombing ISIS will make us safer in the West. Why would further attacks de-radicalise people? If people believe there are radicals in Australia, why would you think this would make them less likely to attack home targets? People need to stop buying in to the narrative that is sold to them and just think logically about it for a minute. Edited by Shatter: 17/9/2014 12:22:04 AM some huge assumptions here........have you considered the 100,000 displaced people who are running from ISIS??? losing their families, houses, lives to these people??? So what? This generation has been in the making since 2001. We planted the seed of hatred why do we have to go back and water it some more? Has the fact that that's what they want missed your attention? Are you 10? Do you need glasses? Is there a hole in your brain? Does your stupidity know no bounds? so what? are you saying we only have terrorists and extremists due to and since the Iraq war???? No. You're the extremist supporting Isis's agenda. Anyone who supports any war short of defending our or our allies sovereignty is utterly stupid and brainwashed beyond measure. We can't stop the extremists in the Middle East but we can stop the extremists and their ilk in Australia. \:d/ \:d/ yippee i'm an extremist....\:d/ \:d/ \:d/ you truly are a fucktarded buckled piece of work......best thing for you to do is top yourself....you're already half way there just finish off the job you nutjob........you are so unhinged you should be in a mental institution.....[-o< [-o< [-o< [-o< [-o<
|
|
|
paulbagzFC
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 44K,
Visits: 0
|
|
|
|
mcjules
|
|
Group: Moderators
Posts: 8.4K,
Visits: 0
|
No better way to try and win an argument than to suggest that your opponent commits suicide. :roll: Edited by mcjules: 18/9/2014 09:33:14 AM
Insert Gertjan Verbeek gifs here
|
|
|
SlyGoat36
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 5.9K,
Visits: 0
|
batfink wrote:Fourfiveone wrote:batfink wrote:Fourfiveone wrote:batfink wrote:Shatter wrote:rusty wrote:mcjules wrote:batfink wrote:mcjules wrote:$400 million a year to get involved. Best use of our funds in a "budget emergency"? but of course when Labor spend on military incursions it's AOK....;) roght How many times do we have to go over that just because I and others here disagree with something the LNP is doing (admittedly it's pretty much everything at the moment) does not instantly mean we support the Labor party's policy? If you can let me know I can get it over with a bit quicker and we can all move on ;) Military involvement and it's associated costs is something very different from the budget situation. We don't get involved in military matters unless it's very serious. In this case the humanitarian and terrorism threat ISIS represents to the west and wider world make it vitally important that we stamp it out, and it should be considered an investment In our long term economic and national security by eliminating primitive threats to peace and order.The budget situation is more to do with wasteful spending where you have too much money going out on things like Medicare and school kids bonus and not enough coming in to pay for it all, which creates an imbalance which adds to the debt burden, which affects things like the cost of borrowing and sees more money get paid out on interest rather than spent on areas where it's really needed. What do you think would happen if we actually did stamp out ISIS? I could name at least a half dozen splinter groups that are ready to move in. They are not as resourced but some of them are just as brutal. The perpetual bombing of the Middle East by the West is creating generation after generation of terrorists. It's abundantly clear that the current strategy is ad hoc and there is no foreseeable end game. I can understand the desire for intervention but I currently cannot see any benefit for it. Also, your reasoning that continued bombing will create a safer west / world has zero basis in reality. I don't know when this narrative began but blowback is a well understood and established phenomenon. I really don't understand how people fathom that bombing ISIS will make us safer in the West. Why would further attacks de-radicalise people? If people believe there are radicals in Australia, why would you think this would make them less likely to attack home targets? People need to stop buying in to the narrative that is sold to them and just think logically about it for a minute. Edited by Shatter: 17/9/2014 12:22:04 AM some huge assumptions here........have you considered the 100,000 displaced people who are running from ISIS??? losing their families, houses, lives to these people??? So what? This generation has been in the making since 2001. We planted the seed of hatred why do we have to go back and water it some more? Has the fact that that's what they want missed your attention? Are you 10? Do you need glasses? Is there a hole in your brain? Does your stupidity know no bounds? so what? are you saying we only have terrorists and extremists due to and since the Iraq war???? No. You're the extremist supporting Isis's agenda. Anyone who supports any war short of defending our or our allies sovereignty is utterly stupid and brainwashed beyond measure. We can't stop the extremists in the Middle East but we can stop the extremists and their ilk in Australia. \:d/ \:d/ yippee i'm an extremist....\:d/ \:d/ \:d/ you truly are a fucktarded buckled piece of work......best thing for you to do is top yourself....you're already half way there just finish off the job you nutjob........you are so unhinged you should be in a mental institution.....[-o< [-o< [-o< [-o< [-o< Bat finks shit grammar just terrorised us all.
|
|
|
batfink
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 9.9K,
Visits: 0
|
SlyGoat36 wrote:batfink wrote:Fourfiveone wrote:batfink wrote:Fourfiveone wrote:batfink wrote:Shatter wrote:rusty wrote:mcjules wrote:batfink wrote:mcjules wrote:$400 million a year to get involved. Best use of our funds in a "budget emergency"? but of course when Labor spend on military incursions it's AOK....;) roght How many times do we have to go over that just because I and others here disagree with something the LNP is doing (admittedly it's pretty much everything at the moment) does not instantly mean we support the Labor party's policy? If you can let me know I can get it over with a bit quicker and we can all move on ;) Military involvement and it's associated costs is something very different from the budget situation. We don't get involved in military matters unless it's very serious. In this case the humanitarian and terrorism threat ISIS represents to the west and wider world make it vitally important that we stamp it out, and it should be considered an investment In our long term economic and national security by eliminating primitive threats to peace and order.The budget situation is more to do with wasteful spending where you have too much money going out on things like Medicare and school kids bonus and not enough coming in to pay for it all, which creates an imbalance which adds to the debt burden, which affects things like the cost of borrowing and sees more money get paid out on interest rather than spent on areas where it's really needed. What do you think would happen if we actually did stamp out ISIS? I could name at least a half dozen splinter groups that are ready to move in. They are not as resourced but some of them are just as brutal. The perpetual bombing of the Middle East by the West is creating generation after generation of terrorists. It's abundantly clear that the current strategy is ad hoc and there is no foreseeable end game. I can understand the desire for intervention but I currently cannot see any benefit for it. Also, your reasoning that continued bombing will create a safer west / world has zero basis in reality. I don't know when this narrative began but blowback is a well understood and established phenomenon. I really don't understand how people fathom that bombing ISIS will make us safer in the West. Why would further attacks de-radicalise people? If people believe there are radicals in Australia, why would you think this would make them less likely to attack home targets? People need to stop buying in to the narrative that is sold to them and just think logically about it for a minute. Edited by Shatter: 17/9/2014 12:22:04 AM some huge assumptions here........have you considered the 100,000 displaced people who are running from ISIS??? losing their families, houses, lives to these people??? So what? This generation has been in the making since 2001. We planted the seed of hatred why do we have to go back and water it some more? Has the fact that that's what they want missed your attention? Are you 10? Do you need glasses? Is there a hole in your brain? Does your stupidity know no bounds? so what? are you saying we only have terrorists and extremists due to and since the Iraq war???? No. You're the extremist supporting Isis's agenda. Anyone who supports any war short of defending our or our allies sovereignty is utterly stupid and brainwashed beyond measure. We can't stop the extremists in the Middle East but we can stop the extremists and their ilk in Australia. \:d/ \:d/ yippee i'm an extremist....\:d/ \:d/ \:d/ you truly are a fucktarded buckled piece of work......best thing for you to do is top yourself....you're already half way there just finish off the job you nutjob........you are so unhinged you should be in a mental institution.....[-o< [-o< [-o< [-o< [-o< Bat finks shit grammar just terrorised us all. lol.....\:d/ \:d/ \:d/
|
|
|
Fourfiveone
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 1.1K,
Visits: 0
|
batfink wrote:Fourfiveone wrote:batfink wrote:Fourfiveone wrote:batfink wrote:Shatter wrote:rusty wrote:mcjules wrote:batfink wrote:mcjules wrote:$400 million a year to get involved. Best use of our funds in a "budget emergency"? but of course when Labor spend on military incursions it's AOK....;) roght How many times do we have to go over that just because I and others here disagree with something the LNP is doing (admittedly it's pretty much everything at the moment) does not instantly mean we support the Labor party's policy? If you can let me know I can get it over with a bit quicker and we can all move on ;) Military involvement and it's associated costs is something very different from the budget situation. We don't get involved in military matters unless it's very serious. In this case the humanitarian and terrorism threat ISIS represents to the west and wider world make it vitally important that we stamp it out, and it should be considered an investment In our long term economic and national security by eliminating primitive threats to peace and order.The budget situation is more to do with wasteful spending where you have too much money going out on things like Medicare and school kids bonus and not enough coming in to pay for it all, which creates an imbalance which adds to the debt burden, which affects things like the cost of borrowing and sees more money get paid out on interest rather than spent on areas where it's really needed. What do you think would happen if we actually did stamp out ISIS? I could name at least a half dozen splinter groups that are ready to move in. They are not as resourced but some of them are just as brutal. The perpetual bombing of the Middle East by the West is creating generation after generation of terrorists. It's abundantly clear that the current strategy is ad hoc and there is no foreseeable end game. I can understand the desire for intervention but I currently cannot see any benefit for it. Also, your reasoning that continued bombing will create a safer west / world has zero basis in reality. I don't know when this narrative began but blowback is a well understood and established phenomenon. I really don't understand how people fathom that bombing ISIS will make us safer in the West. Why would further attacks de-radicalise people? If people believe there are radicals in Australia, why would you think this would make them less likely to attack home targets? People need to stop buying in to the narrative that is sold to them and just think logically about it for a minute. Edited by Shatter: 17/9/2014 12:22:04 AM some huge assumptions here........have you considered the 100,000 displaced people who are running from ISIS??? losing their families, houses, lives to these people??? So what? This generation has been in the making since 2001. We planted the seed of hatred why do we have to go back and water it some more? Has the fact that that's what they want missed your attention? Are you 10? Do you need glasses? Is there a hole in your brain? Does your stupidity know no bounds? so what? are you saying we only have terrorists and extremists due to and since the Iraq war???? No. You're the extremist supporting Isis's agenda. Anyone who supports any war short of defending our or our allies sovereignty is utterly stupid and brainwashed beyond measure. We can't stop the extremists in the Middle East but we can stop the extremists and their ilk in Australia. \:d/ \:d/ yippee i'm an extremist....\:d/ \:d/ \:d/ you truly are a fucktarded buckled piece of work......best thing for you to do is top yourself....you're already half way there just finish off the job you nutjob........you are so unhinged you should be in a mental institution.....[-o< [-o< [-o< [-o< [-o< I'm know I'm pretty close to the truth about you because of the reaction it provoked. "Extremism (represented on both sides of the political spectrum) is an ideology (particularly in politics or religion), considered to be far outside the mainstream attitudes of a society or to violate common moral standards" You're calling for people to be killed because of what you read in your daily tabloid. Your an weak minded individual with no morals and Australia would be better off without you and your kind taking us all backwards.
|
|
|
batfink
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 9.9K,
Visits: 0
|
Fourfiveone wrote:batfink wrote:Fourfiveone wrote:batfink wrote:Fourfiveone wrote:batfink wrote:Shatter wrote:rusty wrote:mcjules wrote:batfink wrote:mcjules wrote:$400 million a year to get involved. Best use of our funds in a "budget emergency"? but of course when Labor spend on military incursions it's AOK....;) roght How many times do we have to go over that just because I and others here disagree with something the LNP is doing (admittedly it's pretty much everything at the moment) does not instantly mean we support the Labor party's policy? If you can let me know I can get it over with a bit quicker and we can all move on ;) Military involvement and it's associated costs is something very different from the budget situation. We don't get involved in military matters unless it's very serious. In this case the humanitarian and terrorism threat ISIS represents to the west and wider world make it vitally important that we stamp it out, and it should be considered an investment In our long term economic and national security by eliminating primitive threats to peace and order.The budget situation is more to do with wasteful spending where you have too much money going out on things like Medicare and school kids bonus and not enough coming in to pay for it all, which creates an imbalance which adds to the debt burden, which affects things like the cost of borrowing and sees more money get paid out on interest rather than spent on areas where it's really needed. What do you think would happen if we actually did stamp out ISIS? I could name at least a half dozen splinter groups that are ready to move in. They are not as resourced but some of them are just as brutal. The perpetual bombing of the Middle East by the West is creating generation after generation of terrorists. It's abundantly clear that the current strategy is ad hoc and there is no foreseeable end game. I can understand the desire for intervention but I currently cannot see any benefit for it. Also, your reasoning that continued bombing will create a safer west / world has zero basis in reality. I don't know when this narrative began but blowback is a well understood and established phenomenon. I really don't understand how people fathom that bombing ISIS will make us safer in the West. Why would further attacks de-radicalise people? If people believe there are radicals in Australia, why would you think this would make them less likely to attack home targets? People need to stop buying in to the narrative that is sold to them and just think logically about it for a minute. Edited by Shatter: 17/9/2014 12:22:04 AM some huge assumptions here........have you considered the 100,000 displaced people who are running from ISIS??? losing their families, houses, lives to these people??? So what? This generation has been in the making since 2001. We planted the seed of hatred why do we have to go back and water it some more? Has the fact that that's what they want missed your attention? Are you 10? Do you need glasses? Is there a hole in your brain? Does your stupidity know no bounds? so what? are you saying we only have terrorists and extremists due to and since the Iraq war???? No. You're the extremist supporting Isis's agenda. Anyone who supports any war short of defending our or our allies sovereignty is utterly stupid and brainwashed beyond measure. We can't stop the extremists in the Middle East but we can stop the extremists and their ilk in Australia. \:d/ \:d/ yippee i'm an extremist....\:d/ \:d/ \:d/ you truly are a fucktarded buckled piece of work......best thing for you to do is top yourself....you're already half way there just finish off the job you nutjob........you are so unhinged you should be in a mental institution.....[-o< [-o< [-o< [-o< [-o< I'm know I'm pretty close to the truth about you because of the reaction it provoked. "Extremism (represented on both sides of the political spectrum) is an ideology (particularly in politics or religion), considered to be far outside the mainstream attitudes of a society or to violate common moral standards" You're calling for people to be killed because of what you read in your daily tabloid. Your an weak minded individual with no morals and Australia would be better off without you and your kind taking us all backwards. the response is directly proportional to how much of a fuckstick you are, and you are a fuckstick of epic proportions.....i am not calling for anyone to be killed, i don't read tabloids, i shit bigger than you , and i am in no way weak, i am however sick of lily livered soft cocks like you....assuming you know how the world works while blah blah blahing on about stuff you have no knowledge on......go home and play with your LEGO boy...... Edited by batfink: 18/9/2014 05:51:17 PM
|
|
|
Carlito
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 28K,
Visits: 0
|
 he angry
|
|
|
batfink
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 9.9K,
Visits: 0
|
Fourfiveone wrote:batfink wrote:Fourfiveone wrote:batfink wrote:Fourfiveone wrote:batfink wrote:Shatter wrote:rusty wrote:mcjules wrote:batfink wrote:mcjules wrote:$400 million a year to get involved. Best use of our funds in a "budget emergency"? but of course when Labor spend on military incursions it's AOK....;) roght How many times do we have to go over that just because I and others here disagree with something the LNP is doing (admittedly it's pretty much everything at the moment) does not instantly mean we support the Labor party's policy? If you can let me know I can get it over with a bit quicker and we can all move on ;) Military involvement and it's associated costs is something very different from the budget situation. We don't get involved in military matters unless it's very serious. In this case the humanitarian and terrorism threat ISIS represents to the west and wider world make it vitally important that we stamp it out, and it should be considered an investment In our long term economic and national security by eliminating primitive threats to peace and order.The budget situation is more to do with wasteful spending where you have too much money going out on things like Medicare and school kids bonus and not enough coming in to pay for it all, which creates an imbalance which adds to the debt burden, which affects things like the cost of borrowing and sees more money get paid out on interest rather than spent on areas where it's really needed. What do you think would happen if we actually did stamp out ISIS? I could name at least a half dozen splinter groups that are ready to move in. They are not as resourced but some of them are just as brutal. The perpetual bombing of the Middle East by the West is creating generation after generation of terrorists. It's abundantly clear that the current strategy is ad hoc and there is no foreseeable end game. I can understand the desire for intervention but I currently cannot see any benefit for it. Also, your reasoning that continued bombing will create a safer west / world has zero basis in reality. I don't know when this narrative began but blowback is a well understood and established phenomenon. I really don't understand how people fathom that bombing ISIS will make us safer in the West. Why would further attacks de-radicalise people? If people believe there are radicals in Australia, why would you think this would make them less likely to attack home targets? People need to stop buying in to the narrative that is sold to them and just think logically about it for a minute. Edited by Shatter: 17/9/2014 12:22:04 AM some huge assumptions here........have you considered the 100,000 displaced people who are running from ISIS??? losing their families, houses, lives to these people??? So what? This generation has been in the making since 2001. We planted the seed of hatred why do we have to go back and water it some more? Has the fact that that's what they want missed your attention? Are you 10? Do you need glasses? Is there a hole in your brain? Does your stupidity know no bounds? so what? are you saying we only have terrorists and extremists due to and since the Iraq war???? No. You're the extremist supporting Isis's agenda. Anyone who supports any war short of defending our or our allies sovereignty is utterly stupid and brainwashed beyond measure. We can't stop the extremists in the Middle East but we can stop the extremists and their ilk in Australia. \:d/ \:d/ yippee i'm an extremist....\:d/ \:d/ \:d/ you truly are a fucktarded buckled piece of work......best thing for you to do is top yourself....you're already half way there just finish off the job you nutjob........you are so unhinged you should be in a mental institution.....[-o< [-o< [-o< [-o< [-o< I'm know I'm pretty close to the truth about you because of the reaction it provoked. "Extremism (represented on both sides of the political spectrum) is an ideology (particularly in politics or religion), considered to be far outside the mainstream attitudes of a society or to violate common moral standards" You're calling for people to be killed because of what you read in your daily tabloid. Your an weak minded individual with no morals and Australia would be better off without you and your kind taking us all backwards. sarah hanson young is that you??????? .. yes 451 is sarah hanson young [youtube]moJ7j86MyWw[/youtube] Edited by batfink: 18/9/2014 06:36:14 PM
|
|
|
Fourfiveone
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 1.1K,
Visits: 0
|
batfink wrote:Fourfiveone wrote:batfink wrote:Fourfiveone wrote:batfink wrote:Fourfiveone wrote:batfink wrote:Shatter wrote:rusty wrote:mcjules wrote:batfink wrote:mcjules wrote:$400 million a year to get involved. Best use of our funds in a "budget emergency"? but of course when Labor spend on military incursions it's AOK....;) roght How many times do we have to go over that just because I and others here disagree with something the LNP is doing (admittedly it's pretty much everything at the moment) does not instantly mean we support the Labor party's policy? If you can let me know I can get it over with a bit quicker and we can all move on ;) Military involvement and it's associated costs is something very different from the budget situation. We don't get involved in military matters unless it's very serious. In this case the humanitarian and terrorism threat ISIS represents to the west and wider world make it vitally important that we stamp it out, and it should be considered an investment In our long term economic and national security by eliminating primitive threats to peace and order.The budget situation is more to do with wasteful spending where you have too much money going out on things like Medicare and school kids bonus and not enough coming in to pay for it all, which creates an imbalance which adds to the debt burden, which affects things like the cost of borrowing and sees more money get paid out on interest rather than spent on areas where it's really needed. What do you think would happen if we actually did stamp out ISIS? I could name at least a half dozen splinter groups that are ready to move in. They are not as resourced but some of them are just as brutal. The perpetual bombing of the Middle East by the West is creating generation after generation of terrorists. It's abundantly clear that the current strategy is ad hoc and there is no foreseeable end game. I can understand the desire for intervention but I currently cannot see any benefit for it. Also, your reasoning that continued bombing will create a safer west / world has zero basis in reality. I don't know when this narrative began but blowback is a well understood and established phenomenon. I really don't understand how people fathom that bombing ISIS will make us safer in the West. Why would further attacks de-radicalise people? If people believe there are radicals in Australia, why would you think this would make them less likely to attack home targets? People need to stop buying in to the narrative that is sold to them and just think logically about it for a minute. Edited by Shatter: 17/9/2014 12:22:04 AM some huge assumptions here........have you considered the 100,000 displaced people who are running from ISIS??? losing their families, houses, lives to these people??? So what? This generation has been in the making since 2001. We planted the seed of hatred why do we have to go back and water it some more? Has the fact that that's what they want missed your attention? Are you 10? Do you need glasses? Is there a hole in your brain? Does your stupidity know no bounds? so what? are you saying we only have terrorists and extremists due to and since the Iraq war???? No. You're the extremist supporting Isis's agenda. Anyone who supports any war short of defending our or our allies sovereignty is utterly stupid and brainwashed beyond measure. We can't stop the extremists in the Middle East but we can stop the extremists and their ilk in Australia. \:d/ \:d/ yippee i'm an extremist....\:d/ \:d/ \:d/ you truly are a fucktarded buckled piece of work......best thing for you to do is top yourself....you're already half way there just finish off the job you nutjob........you are so unhinged you should be in a mental institution.....[-o< [-o< [-o< [-o< [-o< I'm know I'm pretty close to the truth about you because of the reaction it provoked. "Extremism (represented on both sides of the political spectrum) is an ideology (particularly in politics or religion), considered to be far outside the mainstream attitudes of a society or to violate common moral standards" You're calling for people to be killed because of what you read in your daily tabloid. Your an weak minded individual with no morals and Australia would be better off without you and your kind taking us all backwards. the response is directly proportional to how much of a fuckstick you are, and you are a fuckstick of epic proportions.....i am not calling for anyone to be killed, i don't read tabloids, i shit bigger than you , and i am in no way weak, i am however sick of lily livered soft cocks like you....assuming you know how the world works while blah blah blahing on about stuff you have no knowledge on......go home and play with your LEGO boy...... Edited by batfink: 18/9/2014 05:51:17 PM Everything about you is weak, from your arguements to your grammar. Australia is unfortunately diseased with weak minded people like you who have been brainwashed into believing violence is the answer.
|
|
|
paulbagzFC
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 44K,
Visits: 0
|
Whoa, batfink takes big shits! :shock: -PB
|
|
|
u4486662
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 8.8K,
Visits: 0
|
"I shit bigger than you" Someone sig it.
|
|
|
switters
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 5.6K,
Visits: 0
|
u4486662 wrote:"I shit bigger than you" Someone sig it.  :lol:
|
|
|
Fourfiveone
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 1.1K,
Visits: 0
|
batfink wrote:go home and play with your LEGO boy......  Maybe if I write my all my posts in Lego blocks you might be able to understand it a little better and form a coherent response.
|
|
|
batfink
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 9.9K,
Visits: 0
|
Fourfiveone wrote:batfink wrote:go home and play with your LEGO boy......  Maybe if I write my all my posts in Lego blocks you might be able to understand it a little better and form a coherent response. well done ....... Firstly anyone who thinks that we just sit back and watch ISIS carry out murder after murder and it will all sort itself out is deluded..... Secondly i don't support violence as the first response to any problem, i would like you to tell me what you would do if a thug burst his was into your house and started bashing your children and wife?? Thirdly anyone who thinks ALL of the terrorist issues around the world are a RESULT of the Iraq or Afghanistan war, i would encourage them to do so research and look back in history and see how long these type of activities have been taking place. Oh and i thought it was a nice touch the little Lego flowers... Have a great day;) ;) ;)
|
|
|
notorganic
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 21K,
Visits: 0
|
batfink wrote:Firstly anyone who thinks that we just sit back and watch ISIS carry out murder after murder and it will all sort itself out is deluded..... Why wouldn't it sort itself out? More specifically, and it's probably going to sound like a heartless question so there's no un-blunt way to ask it, why do you care about people you don't go being murdered after they involved themselves in conflicts in The Middle East? batfink wrote:Secondly i don't support violence as the first response to any problem, i would like you to tell me what you would do if a thug burst his was into your house and started bashing your children and wife?? I would revert to my focal point training to kill whoever had entered my house and was bashing my wife and child, but this isn't a relevant situation to isolated home invasions. There are other options on the table than deliberately going halfway around the world to engage in a group of militants. batfink wrote:Thirdly anyone who thinks ALL of the terrorist issues around the world are a RESULT of the Iraq or Afghanistan war, i would encourage them to do so research and look back in history and see how long these type of activities have been taking place. I don't think anyone is saying that terrorist issues around the world are a result of the Iraq or Afghanistan wars specifically, just that they have done nothing to decrease resentment and anti-West sentiment, and that they, as well as all other Western interventions in the Middle East, have allowed that sentiment to flourish and be exploited.
|
|
|
batfink
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 9.9K,
Visits: 0
|
notorganic wrote:batfink wrote:Firstly anyone who thinks that we just sit back and watch ISIS carry out murder after murder and it will all sort itself out is deluded..... Why wouldn't it sort itself out? pretty sure the problem has been around since time and memorial and it hasn't sorted itself out so farMore specifically, and it's probably going to sound like a heartless question so there's no un-blunt way to ask it, why do you care about people you don't go being murdered after they involved themselves in conflicts in The Middle East? well Matt from you, who cries like sarah hanson young about a few asylum seeker being denied entry, that is a ripe statement, so you don't care if ISIS are slaughtering innocent people???
batfink wrote:Secondly i don't support violence as the first response to any problem, i would like you to tell me what you would do if a thug burst his was into your house and started bashing your children and wife?? I would revert to my focal point training to kill whoever had entered my house and was bashing my wife and child, but this isn't a relevant situation to isolated home invasions. There are other options on the table than deliberately going halfway around the world to engage in a group of militants. My comment is based on 451 comments that violence is not that answer, and i agree that it is not the answer in 99% of cases, however if a thug starts bashing your family, what do you do, ask him to stop and wait for the police to arrive?????batfink wrote:Thirdly anyone who thinks ALL of the terrorist issues around the world are a RESULT of the Iraq or Afghanistan war, i would encourage them to do so research and look back in history and see how long these type of activities have been taking place. I don't think anyone is saying that terrorist issues around the world are a result of the Iraq or Afghanistan wars specifically, just that they have done nothing to decrease resentment and anti-West sentiment, and that they, as well as all other Western interventions in the Middle East, have allowed that sentiment to flourish and be exploited. in previous posts certain people are suggesting that these terrorists are only reacting to our interference in their country and we are just creating the problem, to which i say..."what unadulterated bullshit" have a great day...;)
|
|
|
notorganic
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 21K,
Visits: 0
|
batfink wrote:pretty sure the problem has been around since time and memorial and it hasn't sorted itself out so far And The West (tm) has never tried not intervening, so why not give it a go and see if we get a different result? batfink wrote:well Matt from you, who cries like sarah hanson young about a few asylum seeker being denied entry, that is a ripe statement, so you don't care if ISIS are slaughtering innocent people??? I do not, and I didn't say that I don't care about them, I'm just asking why you do. I've already shared my thoughts on what we should do in the Middle East and why we should leave The Islamic State alone. People disagree because they seem to think that doing the same thing over and over will breed a different result if you keep doing it. batfink wrote:My comment is based on 451 comments that violence is not that answer, and i agree that it is not the answer in 99% of cases, however if a thug starts bashing your family, what do you do, ask him to stop and wait for the police to arrive????? Irrelevant to Middle East violence, but you get violent in this situation because your family in your own home are in immediate threat of injury and death. So you agree that violence is not the answer in 99% of cases, and then use a 1% case to highlight your point? batfink wrote:in previous posts certain people are suggesting that these terrorists are only reacting to our interference in their country and we are just creating the problem, to which i say..."what unadulterated bullshit" You don't provide any further insight to your contradictory outburst of profanity, though, so it can be disregarded as soon as it is asserted. Have a great day ;)
|
|
|