afromanGT
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 77K,
Visits: 0
|
433 wrote:afromanGT wrote:433 wrote:RedKat wrote:Part about Jews being forced to register sounds a bit scarily familiar It's from Israeli media, so I wouldn't trust that entirely... Edited by 433: 18/4/2014 11:51:27 AM How do you get 'israeli media' out of "associated press"? Most media is owned by Jews mate :lol: I'm not being anti-Semitic or whatever, it's fact. They seem to have a constant persecution complex. That's all well and good but you don't know who the particular reporter is working for, there is no discernible context for political motive other than what you've implied. And even then, you've got little to no evidence that doesn't come from the tin foil hat brigade to support that claim.
|
|
|
|
Carlito
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 28K,
Visits: 0
|
I wonder why ;)
|
|
|
433
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 6.7K,
Visits: 0
|
afromanGT wrote:433 wrote:RedKat wrote:Part about Jews being forced to register sounds a bit scarily familiar It's from Israeli media, so I wouldn't trust that entirely... Edited by 433: 18/4/2014 11:51:27 AM How do you get 'israeli media' out of "associated press"? Most media is owned by Jews mate :lol: I'm not being anti-Semitic or whatever, it's fact. They seem to have a constant persecution complex.
|
|
|
thupercoach
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 8.3K,
Visits: 0
|
afromanGT wrote:433 wrote:RedKat wrote:Part about Jews being forced to register sounds a bit scarily familiar It's from Israeli media, so I wouldn't trust that entirely... Edited by 433: 18/4/2014 11:51:27 AM How do you get 'israeli media' out of "associated press"? World media. Run by Jews. Did you miss Anti-Semitism 101? Look, I know all about that stuff and I agree with the rabbi, it's just provocation. It's just as likely to be Russians pretending to be Ukrainians in order to continue painting them as anti-semites, or Ukrainians posing as the Russians in balaclavas trying to smear the Russians as anti-semites. One or the other doing it to make the other side look bad in the world's eyes. Both have been guilty of pogroms over time but on this occasion I think it's just grubby, rank street politics.
|
|
|
Glory Recruit
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 13K,
Visits: 0
|
Terrible what's happened to the Korean ferry.
|
|
|
afromanGT
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 77K,
Visits: 0
|
433 wrote:RedKat wrote:Part about Jews being forced to register sounds a bit scarily familiar It's from Israeli media, so I wouldn't trust that entirely... Edited by 433: 18/4/2014 11:51:27 AM How do you get 'israeli media' out of "associated press"?
|
|
|
ricecrackers
|
|
Group: Banned Members
Posts: 3.5K,
Visits: 0
|
RedKat wrote: Part about Jews being forced to register sounds a bit scarily familiar
its supposed to. its new Kiev regime propaganda and you've fallen for it hook line and sinker.
|
|
|
433
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 6.7K,
Visits: 0
|
RedKat wrote:Part about Jews being forced to register sounds a bit scarily familiar It's from Israeli media, so I wouldn't trust that entirely... Edited by 433: 18/4/2014 11:51:27 AM
|
|
|
afromanGT
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 77K,
Visits: 0
|
This whole thing just gets more and more bizarre.
|
|
|
afromanGT
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 77K,
Visits: 0
|
|
|
|
u4486662
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 8.8K,
Visits: 0
|
|
|
|
ricecrackers
|
|
Group: Banned Members
Posts: 3.5K,
Visits: 0
|
afromanGT wrote:ricecrackers wrote:afromanGT wrote:ricecrackers wrote:afromanGT wrote:TIL: When everyone says ricecrackers is wrong, ricecrackers is right. 'everyone' is you and a couple of other stupids that agree with you Edited by ricecrackers: 17/4/2014 07:51:43 PM As opposed to NOBODY who agrees with you. You're making some assumptions there. You often do this; you defer to how many theoretical people agree with your position instead of arguing the topic at hand using facts and logic...as you're routinely outpointed on those measures. Name one poster who has agreed with you. this forum is not the whole world. in fact its a tiny incestuous community dominated chiefly by your posts. 78k of them. again you've proved my point that you cannot argue a topic without deferring to people who agree with you. here again, you're no longer arguing my points you're simply making a personal attack. standard afrodope modus operandi.
|
|
|
afromanGT
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 77K,
Visits: 0
|
ricecrackers wrote:afromanGT wrote:ricecrackers wrote:afromanGT wrote:TIL: When everyone says ricecrackers is wrong, ricecrackers is right. 'everyone' is you and a couple of other stupids that agree with you Edited by ricecrackers: 17/4/2014 07:51:43 PM As opposed to NOBODY who agrees with you. You're making some assumptions there. You often do this; you defer to how many theoretical people agree with your position instead of arguing the topic at hand using facts and logic...as you're routinely outpointed on those measures. Name one poster who has agreed with you.
|
|
|
ricecrackers
|
|
Group: Banned Members
Posts: 3.5K,
Visits: 0
|
humbert wrote:I've had my disagreements with Afro, but am adequately convinced of his intelligence. You are something else. that doesn't say a lot complimentary about you. i pegged you quite early on.
|
|
|
ricecrackers
|
|
Group: Banned Members
Posts: 3.5K,
Visits: 0
|
afromanGT wrote:ricecrackers wrote:afromanGT wrote:TIL: When everyone says ricecrackers is wrong, ricecrackers is right. 'everyone' is you and a couple of other stupids that agree with you Edited by ricecrackers: 17/4/2014 07:51:43 PM As opposed to NOBODY who agrees with you. You're making some assumptions there. You often do this; you defer to how many theoretical people agree with your position instead of arguing the topic at hand using facts and logic...as you're routinely outpointed on those measures.
|
|
|
humbert
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 1.6K,
Visits: 0
|
I've had my disagreements with Afro, but am adequately convinced of his intelligence. You are something else.
|
|
|
afromanGT
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 77K,
Visits: 0
|
ricecrackers wrote:afromanGT wrote:TIL: When everyone says ricecrackers is wrong, ricecrackers is right. 'everyone' is you and a couple of other stupids that agree with you Edited by ricecrackers: 17/4/2014 07:51:43 PM As opposed to NOBODY who agrees with you.
|
|
|
ricecrackers
|
|
Group: Banned Members
Posts: 3.5K,
Visits: 0
|
afromanGT wrote:TIL: When everyone says ricecrackers is wrong, ricecrackers is right. 'everyone' is you and a couple of other stupids that agree with you Edited by ricecrackers: 17/4/2014 07:51:43 PM
|
|
|
afromanGT
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 77K,
Visits: 0
|
TIL: When everyone says ricecrackers is wrong, ricecrackers is right.
|
|
|
ricecrackers
|
|
Group: Banned Members
Posts: 3.5K,
Visits: 0
|
humbert wrote:ricecrackers wrote:humbert wrote:ricecrackers wrote:what is this rubbish? Obama had little to do with it the State Dept and the neo cons are responsible for stirring up trouble in Ukraine Obama is just an insurance salesman and bad lawyer The neo-cons are ensconced in the Defense Department you fool. comprehension fail? this has what to do with the Obama who has less influence over foreign affairs than his secretary of state? You are of the opinion that the State Department is full of neo-cons hell bent on war with Russia. This is patently false. The State Department is by nature, risk averse, liberal, and inclined to conciliation and negotiation. In other words, your foolishness has been caught out yet again. you're so full of yourself and talking out of your arse you've been handed a lesson in the past and now you're behaving in a manner of one burnt looking for revenge i suggest you take stock of yourself and buy a piece of perspective i never suggested the State Dept is full of neo cons, however John Kerry who is its secretary very much falls into that category as does Victoria Nuland. these are the most influential figures of that Dept. I also said the State Dept AND the neo cons indicating they were two entities. eg John McCain, who is not state Dept but very much a neo con
|
|
|
afromanGT
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 77K,
Visits: 0
|
The US uses conflict to stimulate the US economy, however there is not way in hell they'll risk direct conflict with Russia as that will inevitably end in nuclear arms.
|
|
|
humbert
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 1.6K,
Visits: 0
|
ricecrackers wrote:humbert wrote:ricecrackers wrote:what is this rubbish? Obama had little to do with it the State Dept and the neo cons are responsible for stirring up trouble in Ukraine Obama is just an insurance salesman and bad lawyer The neo-cons are ensconced in the Defense Department you fool. comprehension fail? this has what to do with the Obama who has less influence over foreign affairs than his secretary of state? You are of the opinion that the State Department is full of neo-cons hell bent on war with Russia. This is patently false. The State Department is by nature, risk averse, liberal, and inclined to conciliation and negotiation. In other words, your foolishness has been caught out yet again.
|
|
|
BrisbaneBhoy
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 2.9K,
Visits: 0
|
Replace the word "Obama" with "policy makers in the USA", maybe??
🇮🇪Hail Hail🇮🇪
|
|
|
ricecrackers
|
|
Group: Banned Members
Posts: 3.5K,
Visits: 0
|
humbert wrote:ricecrackers wrote:what is this rubbish? Obama had little to do with it the State Dept and the neo cons are responsible for stirring up trouble in Ukraine Obama is just an insurance salesman and bad lawyer The neo-cons are ensconced in the Defense Department you fool. comprehension fail? this has what to do with the Obama who has less influence over foreign affairs than his secretary of state?
|
|
|
humbert
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 1.6K,
Visits: 0
|
ricecrackers wrote:what is this rubbish? Obama had little to do with it the State Dept and the neo cons are responsible for stirring up trouble in Ukraine Obama is just an insurance salesman and bad lawyer The neo-cons are ensconced in the Defense Department you fool.
|
|
|
afromanGT
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 77K,
Visits: 0
|
How are neo-conservatives responsible for a Communist leader's actions involving Crimea?
|
|
|
ricecrackers
|
|
Group: Banned Members
Posts: 3.5K,
Visits: 0
|
what is this rubbish? Obama had little to do with it the State Dept and the neo cons are responsible for stirring up trouble in Ukraine Obama is just an insurance salesman and bad lawyer
|
|
|
Glory Recruit
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 13K,
Visits: 0
|
zimbos_05 wrote:Iridium1010 wrote:thejollyvic wrote:i recently watched a doco on the civil war in tripoli between sunni muslims and alwawites i think... can someone explain the difference for me ive tried to read up on it but i still don't understand pardon my ignorance... Zimbos might know, alawites are an off shoot of shia Islam so they probably disagree with Sunnis on the succession of Mohammad.From what I've heard from other Muslims, Alawites are closer to Christians. I don't think it's as clear cut as Alawites vs Sunni. @condemned Yeah Michael Jordan had to work twice as hard as any white guy in a black dominated sport, keep up the anti white talk. Edited by iridium1010: 14/4/2014 02:04:49 PM I am not so clear on Alawites myself. They are a very secretive group and not much about them is known in the wider in the general outside community. Their name is derived from Ali RA who was the last Caliph in Islam. They are an off shoot of Shias but slightly more extreme. Alawites take a step further in the veneration of Ali RA, allegedly investing him with divine attributes. Other specific elements such as the belief in divine incarnation, permissibility of alcohol, celebration of Christmas and Zoroastrian new year makes Alawite Islam highly suspect in the eyes of many orthodox Sunnis and Shiites. thx Edited by iridium1010: 16/4/2014 06:12:18 PM
|
|
|
zimbos_05
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 15K,
Visits: 0
|
thupercoach wrote:zimbos_05 wrote:Iridium1010 wrote:thejollyvic wrote:i recently watched a doco on the civil war in tripoli between sunni muslims and alwawites i think... can someone explain the difference for me ive tried to read up on it but i still don't understand pardon my ignorance... Zimbos might know, alawites are an off shoot of shia Islam so they probably disagree with Sunnis on the succession of Mohammad.From what I've heard from other Muslims, Alawites are closer to Christians. I don't think it's as clear cut as Alawites vs Sunni. @condemned Yeah Michael Jordan had to work twice as hard as any white guy in a black dominated sport, keep up the anti white talk. Edited by iridium1010: 14/4/2014 02:04:49 PM I am not so clear on Alawites myself. They are a very secretive group and not much about them is known in the wider in the general outside community. Their name is derived from Ali RA who was the last Caliph in Islam. They are an off shoot of Shias but slightly more extreme. Alawites take a step further in the veneration of Ali RA, allegedly investing him with divine attributes. Other specific elements such as the belief in divine incarnation, permissibility of alcohol, celebration of Christmas and Zoroastrian new year makes Alawite Islam highly suspect in the eyes of many orthodox Sunnis and Shiites. Would they still do the Haj? Im fairly certain that Shiites have a different pilgrimage that they do in Iran. I'm not hundred percent sure. I have seen them at the Umrah, not so sure if to them Hajj is regarded as the same as it is for Sunnis.
|
|
|
Footyroo
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 196,
Visits: 0
|
Busted! Obama's Plan for World War Starting in Ukraine Was Exposed in 2008 by Russia! [youtube]watch?v=pjkiUxSA6u8&hd=1[/youtube] http://www.utro.ru/articles/2008/12/26/789711.shtmlhttps://www.google.com/search?q=http://www.utro.ru/2008/12/26/peredovica/&start=0&cad=h
|
|
|