World Politics/Global Events


World Politics/Global Events

Author
Message
mouflonrouge
mouflonrouge
Pro
Pro (2.8K reputation)Pro (2.8K reputation)Pro (2.8K reputation)Pro (2.8K reputation)Pro (2.8K reputation)Pro (2.8K reputation)Pro (2.8K reputation)Pro (2.8K reputation)Pro (2.8K reputation)Pro (2.8K reputation)Pro (2.8K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 2.8K, Visits: 0
Munrubenmuz - 16 Nov 2019 6:15 PM
Enzo Bearzot - 16 Nov 2019 5:49 PM

If Labour spent like that you'd have a conniption but because Trump....reasons...

Have I got that right?

How many times have you banged on about Labour spending all of the government's surpluses and wasting the money saved and kicking the can down the road etc etc only for others to have to pick up the bill but for some bizarro reason it's OK for Trump to do it.



The is ok for Trump to do?

Can you provide an example of Trump increasing the spending deficit please? 



Edited
6 Years Ago by mouflonrouge
mouflonrouge
mouflonrouge
Pro
Pro (2.8K reputation)Pro (2.8K reputation)Pro (2.8K reputation)Pro (2.8K reputation)Pro (2.8K reputation)Pro (2.8K reputation)Pro (2.8K reputation)Pro (2.8K reputation)Pro (2.8K reputation)Pro (2.8K reputation)Pro (2.8K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 2.8K, Visits: 0
Munrubenmuz - 16 Nov 2019 6:18 PM
Enzo Bearzot - 16 Nov 2019 5:44 PM

Whether Biden should have been there is moot.  Trump asked a foreign government to investigate his opponent.  In times gone by decent members of his own party would have forced him to resign.  

Because you ignored my question I'll ask you again.....

Irrespective of your politics though in what sort of alternate reality that you live in is it acceptable to ask a foreign power to investigate your opponent?  He, by his own admission, openly asked a foreign power to interfere in the domestic politics of the US.


[/quote]

Let me get this straight! You are accusing Trump of asking a foreign power to investigate his opponent now? 

Desperate to say the least.

Even if true, who cares? 
Enzo Bearzot
Enzo Bearzot
Pro
Pro (4.8K reputation)Pro (4.8K reputation)Pro (4.8K reputation)Pro (4.8K reputation)Pro (4.8K reputation)Pro (4.8K reputation)Pro (4.8K reputation)Pro (4.8K reputation)Pro (4.8K reputation)Pro (4.8K reputation)Pro (4.8K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 4.5K, Visits: 0
Munrubenmuz - 16 Nov 2019 4:58 PM
Enzo Bearzot - 16 Nov 2019 3:43 PM

Ignorance is a choice so perhaps you could get yourself up to speed here as to why he was there.  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hunter_Biden

Irrespective of your politics though in what sort of alternate reality that you live in is it acceptable to ask a foreign power to investigate your opponent?  He, by his own admission, openly asked a foreign power to interfere in the domestic politics of the US. 

If Anthony Albanese or Bill Shorten did that then they should go to jail no questions asked.  If Hillary did that they'd be calling for a lynching in the streets.




As it stands the evidence against Trump is not impeachable.

Enzo Bearzot
Enzo Bearzot
Pro
Pro (4.8K reputation)Pro (4.8K reputation)Pro (4.8K reputation)Pro (4.8K reputation)Pro (4.8K reputation)Pro (4.8K reputation)Pro (4.8K reputation)Pro (4.8K reputation)Pro (4.8K reputation)Pro (4.8K reputation)Pro (4.8K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 4.5K, Visits: 0
Munrubenmuz - 16 Nov 2019 6:15 PM
Enzo Bearzot - 16 Nov 2019 5:49 PM

If Labour spent like that you'd have a conniption but because Trump....reasons...

Have I got that right?

How many times have you banged on about Labour spending all of the government's surpluses and wasting the money saved and kicking the can down the road etc etc only for others to have to pick up the bill but for some bizarro reason it's OK for Trump to do it.



1.What is a surplus-its the government taxing more than they needed to run the country. I hate giving a cent more of my money to government than I am required to do, so a surplus?. F that.

2.  There is good debt and bad debt.  You borrow to buy a house=good debt.  To start a business=good debt but more risk. Labor doesn't understand teh difference between good and bad debt.  To them, its Someone Else's Money, so who cares?

Carlito
Carlito
Legend
Legend (28K reputation)Legend (28K reputation)Legend (28K reputation)Legend (28K reputation)Legend (28K reputation)Legend (28K reputation)Legend (28K reputation)Legend (28K reputation)Legend (28K reputation)Legend (28K reputation)Legend (28K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 28K, Visits: 0
Enzo Bearzot - 16 Nov 2019 7:54 PM
Munrubenmuz - 16 Nov 2019 6:15 PM

1.What is a surplus-its the government taxing more than they needed to run the country. I hate giving a cent more of my money to government than I am required to do, so a surplus?. F that.

2.  There is good debt and bad debt.  You borrow to buy a house=good debt.  To start a business=good debt but more risk. Labor doesn't understand teh difference between good and bad debt.  To them, its Someone Else's Money, so who cares?

Are You seriously  equalling house hold debt to governemnt debt? Its not the same . All governments  are  in debt. Surpluses are a furphy and are used to pork barrel. We need governments to spend not horde it.
mouflonrouge
mouflonrouge
Pro
Pro (2.8K reputation)Pro (2.8K reputation)Pro (2.8K reputation)Pro (2.8K reputation)Pro (2.8K reputation)Pro (2.8K reputation)Pro (2.8K reputation)Pro (2.8K reputation)Pro (2.8K reputation)Pro (2.8K reputation)Pro (2.8K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 2.8K, Visits: 0
MvFCArsenal16.8 - 16 Nov 2019 9:34 PM
Enzo Bearzot - 16 Nov 2019 7:54 PM

Are You seriously  equalling house hold debt to governemnt debt? Its not the same . All governments  are  in debt. Surpluses are a furphy and are used to pork barrel. We need governments to spend not horde it.

Have you ever heard of Greece, Portugal, Spain, Ireland and Italy? The so called PIGS?

They didn't horde it and now they have the most awful austerity ever inflicted on any population and 30% unemployment.

No, what you say is incredible irresponsible. Governments are only able to spend what is sustainable. There should be a surplus preferably, but if there isn't they can only spend in proportion to projected growth and if they do not or there is a downturn or financial crisis and they remain in debt, then look out. It isn't a good thing. And those who suffer the most are the poor.

You can only borrow if you know your GDP is increasing. If your GDP isn't increasing then your debt to GDP ratio increases and eventually it will become unmanageable to the point where the State cant make payments. Tax isn't an endless tap either because what happens is that business tightens its belts, sacks workers and stops investing. And because there is less employment, there is less tax for the state and things go from bad to worse.  Also Corporate profits decline, resulting in even less tax revenue for the State.

But these are concepts the left does not understand. After all, you don't want a State to horde it. Just spend spend and spend till we collapse. And collapse we will just like Venezuela.

Look, economics isn't your forte. Stick to the A League sunshine! Stick to the A League.

Edited
6 Years Ago by mouflonrouge
paulbagzFC
paulbagzFC
Legend
Legend (45K reputation)Legend (45K reputation)Legend (45K reputation)Legend (45K reputation)Legend (45K reputation)Legend (45K reputation)Legend (45K reputation)Legend (45K reputation)Legend (45K reputation)Legend (45K reputation)Legend (45K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 44K, Visits: 0
mouflonrouge - 16 Nov 2019 6:58 PM
Munrubenmuz - 16 Nov 2019 6:18 PM

Whether Biden should have been there is moot.  Trump asked a foreign government to investigate his opponent.  In times gone by decent members of his own party would have forced him to resign.  

Because you ignored my question I'll ask you again.....

Irrespective of your politics though in what sort of alternate reality that you live in is it acceptable to ask a foreign power to investigate your opponent?  He, by his own admission, openly asked a foreign power to interfere in the domestic politics of the US.


[/quote]

Let me get this straight! You are accusing Trump of asking a foreign power to investigate his opponent now? 

Desperate to say the least.

Even if true, who cares? 
[/quote]

lol this thread has hit it's peak.

-PB

https://i.imgur.com/batge7K.jpg

mouflonrouge
mouflonrouge
Pro
Pro (2.8K reputation)Pro (2.8K reputation)Pro (2.8K reputation)Pro (2.8K reputation)Pro (2.8K reputation)Pro (2.8K reputation)Pro (2.8K reputation)Pro (2.8K reputation)Pro (2.8K reputation)Pro (2.8K reputation)Pro (2.8K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 2.8K, Visits: 0
paulbagzFC - 16 Nov 2019 10:23 PM
mouflonrouge - 16 Nov 2019 6:58 PM

Let me get this straight! You are accusing Trump of asking a foreign power to investigate his opponent now? 

Desperate to say the least.

Even if true, who cares? 
[/quote]

lol this thread has hit it's peak.

-PB
[/quote]

That started when you all started talking about Trump's impeachment. nearly 4 years ago! lol

Neeeext!

Edited
6 Years Ago by mouflonrouge
mouflonrouge
mouflonrouge
Pro
Pro (2.8K reputation)Pro (2.8K reputation)Pro (2.8K reputation)Pro (2.8K reputation)Pro (2.8K reputation)Pro (2.8K reputation)Pro (2.8K reputation)Pro (2.8K reputation)Pro (2.8K reputation)Pro (2.8K reputation)Pro (2.8K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 2.8K, Visits: 0
MvFCArsenal16.8 - 16 Nov 2019 9:34 PM
Enzo Bearzot - 16 Nov 2019 7:54 PM

Are You seriously  equalling house hold debt to governemnt debt? Its not the same . All governments  are  in debt. Surpluses are a furphy and are used to pork barrel. We need governments to spend not horde it.

Because economics isn't your forte, think of it as your household budget.

Can you keep spending more than you earn? You can for a while. And you can keep doing it in proportion to wage or income increases. If you buy a rental property, then that is good debt because your income increases along with your debt.

But if you just keep borrowing for things that do not create income and your wage increases don't keep pace, then eventually you will not be able to service your loans and you will have to declare bankruptcy. You will lose everything including the roof over your head.

So in order for the State to spend, it has to tax someone. Tax really isn't a problem. It's a necessity. It becomes a problem when Tax is too much and becomes a dissinsentive to investment and business. When it becomes a dissinsentive to business and corporations and also to productivity and workers, they start to cut back and what happens there is they reduce investing, reduce spending and reduce employment. Therefore tax receipts for the State decline further, thus compounding the problems and the deficit.

That is why we can only sustainably spend and sustainably borrow. Otherwise what we are doing is actually robbing future generations and our own children.

this is the reason why ScoMo won the elections. It's because the vast majority know how the household budget works. The vast majority are trying to balance their own budgets and its proving to be harder and harder.

Edited
6 Years Ago by mouflonrouge
Carlito
Carlito
Legend
Legend (28K reputation)Legend (28K reputation)Legend (28K reputation)Legend (28K reputation)Legend (28K reputation)Legend (28K reputation)Legend (28K reputation)Legend (28K reputation)Legend (28K reputation)Legend (28K reputation)Legend (28K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 28K, Visits: 0
mouflonrouge - 16 Nov 2019 10:45 PM
MvFCArsenal16.8 - 16 Nov 2019 9:34 PM

Because economics isn't your forte, think of it as your household budget.

Can you keep spending more than you earn? You can for a while. And you can keep doing it in proportion to wage or income increases. If you buy a rental property, then that is good debt because your income increases along with your debt.

But if you just keep borrowing for things that do not create income and your wage increases don't keep pace, then eventually you will not be able to service your loans and you will have to declare bankruptcy. You will lose everything including the roof over your head.

So in order for the State to spend, it has to tax someone. Tax really isn't a problem. It's a necessity. It becomes a problem when Tax is too much and becomes a dissinsentive to investment and business. When it becomes a dissinsentive to business and corporations and also to productivity and workers, they start to cut back and what happens there is they reduce investing, reduce spending and reduce employment. Therefore tax receipts for the State decline further, thus compounding the problems and the deficit.

That is why we can only sustainably spend and sustainably borrow. Otherwise what we are doing is actually robbing future generations and our own children.

this is the reason why ScoMo won the elections. It's because the vast majority know how the household budget works. The vast majority are trying to balance their own budgets and its proving to be harder and harder.
Again houseold debt is  nowhere the  same as government  debt you imbecile. Sustainbly borrow ? You mean give out grants to companies that go bankrupt ? Or dont need Grants  in the first place. 

mouflonrouge
mouflonrouge
Pro
Pro (2.8K reputation)Pro (2.8K reputation)Pro (2.8K reputation)Pro (2.8K reputation)Pro (2.8K reputation)Pro (2.8K reputation)Pro (2.8K reputation)Pro (2.8K reputation)Pro (2.8K reputation)Pro (2.8K reputation)Pro (2.8K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 2.8K, Visits: 0
MvFCArsenal16.8 - 17 Nov 2019 12:22 AM
mouflonrouge - 16 Nov 2019 10:45 PM
Again houseold debt is  nowhere the  same as government  debt you imbecile. Sustainbly borrow ? You mean give out grants to companies that go bankrupt ? Or dont need Grants  in the first place. 

What grants and to which companies?

Please provide examples. I have not heard of Government providing grants to business.

And secondly, Government Debt is debt. It needs to be paid back and yes my examples are perfectly valid. A State can't just keep increasing its debt. In case that gasn't sunk into your thick head, then I suggest you research the Global Financial Crisis and what happened to Greece, Italy, Spain, Portugal, Ireland and Cyprus.

433
433
World Class
World Class (6.9K reputation)World Class (6.9K reputation)World Class (6.9K reputation)World Class (6.9K reputation)World Class (6.9K reputation)World Class (6.9K reputation)World Class (6.9K reputation)World Class (6.9K reputation)World Class (6.9K reputation)World Class (6.9K reputation)World Class (6.9K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 6.7K, Visits: 0
mouflonrouge - 16 Nov 2019 10:45 PM
MvFCArsenal16.8 - 16 Nov 2019 9:34 PM

Because economics isn't your forte, think of it as your household budget.



bruh
Burztur
Burztur
World Class
World Class (9.4K reputation)World Class (9.4K reputation)World Class (9.4K reputation)World Class (9.4K reputation)World Class (9.4K reputation)World Class (9.4K reputation)World Class (9.4K reputation)World Class (9.4K reputation)World Class (9.4K reputation)World Class (9.4K reputation)World Class (9.4K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 9.1K, Visits: 0
Enzo Bearzot - 16 Nov 2019 4:24 PM
433 - 16 Nov 2019 4:09 PM

Why re you resorting to insults?  I 

Do you have ANY idea of what the policy outcomes have been under Trump for the plebs 

Or is it that you hate Trump and follow what Hollywood, New York and Washington Media tell you and that's as far as you go?

FYI:

- 6 million jobs added

- 500,000 manufacturing jobs added

- lowest unemployment in 51 years

- 7.6 million job vacancies ie more jobs than people to fill them

- Blacks and Hispanics leading the job growth figures, with female Hispanics leading the way

- The percentage of Americans living with income below the official poverty line went down to 11.8% of the population in 2018, the lowest level since 2001.

- weekly earnings up 2.3 in rel terms

- economic growth rate up 2%

- food stamp  recipients down 15%

- 90% more Mexican border apprehensions (there's your Wall)

- Home prices up 22%

- Home ownership up

- Stocks up 30 %

- corporate profits up 7%

- handgun production down 23%






Tax reform in the US was a 30 year in the making project. It was not a function of Trump though. It was a function of Republicans controlling the White House, Senate and Congress. If either were not Republican controlled (like Congress now), it wouldn’t have happened. Hence the rush to push it through. The US have a very outdated tax system which the reforms fixed. It lowered the headline rate from 35% to 21% but also got rid of the deferred tax regime for foreign earnings meaning they now tax foreign earnings like everyone else.

The reform also makes hiring in the US more competitive again so this would help with the jobs growth. You’re not going to be better than low cost jurisdictions but you’re tipping the scale back slightly.



Enzo Bearzot
Enzo Bearzot
Pro
Pro (4.8K reputation)Pro (4.8K reputation)Pro (4.8K reputation)Pro (4.8K reputation)Pro (4.8K reputation)Pro (4.8K reputation)Pro (4.8K reputation)Pro (4.8K reputation)Pro (4.8K reputation)Pro (4.8K reputation)Pro (4.8K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 4.5K, Visits: 0
Burztur - 17 Nov 2019 7:02 AM
Enzo Bearzot - 16 Nov 2019 4:24 PM

Tax reform in the US was a 30 year in the making project. It was not a function of Trump though. It was a function of Republicans controlling the White House, Senate and Congress. If either were not Republican controlled (like Congress now), it wouldn’t have happened. Hence the rush to push it through. The US have a very outdated tax system which the reforms fixed. It lowered the headline rate from 35% to 21% but also got rid of the deferred tax regime for foreign earnings meaning they now tax foreign earnings like everyone else.

The reform also makes hiring in the US more competitive again so this would help with the jobs growth. You’re not going to be better than low cost jurisdictions but you’re tipping the scale back slightly.



 If the US economy tanks under Trump you'll be blaming it all 100% on Trump.  But when it booms you want the Democrats to take credit for it.?  Yeah, nah.

The share markets went through the roof more or less immediately after he got in. 

Tarriffs don't work, right?  Wrong.  The Chines product now costs more so the US consumer might buy a competing product which is better value.  This hurts the Chinese.  If they buy the Chinese product anyway, the tax goes to the government and the money stays within the US to be spent on the US people.  Either way the Chinese need to come to the party rather than undercutting the world with cheap labor and at the same time opening ther markets to the world

Trump has more than enough positives he could claim his own in the election campaign, if he could only stop of engaging with the moronic far left Democrats.

One serious question. were you-and by you I mean all the other Trump haters-before I posted them actually aware of any of the economic performance under Trump figures above?

  Or will you just hate Trump and will do so no matter what?

Enzo Bearzot
Enzo Bearzot
Pro
Pro (4.8K reputation)Pro (4.8K reputation)Pro (4.8K reputation)Pro (4.8K reputation)Pro (4.8K reputation)Pro (4.8K reputation)Pro (4.8K reputation)Pro (4.8K reputation)Pro (4.8K reputation)Pro (4.8K reputation)Pro (4.8K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 4.5K, Visits: 0
MvFCArsenal16.8 - 16 Nov 2019 9:34 PM
Enzo Bearzot - 16 Nov 2019 7:54 PM

Are You seriously  equalling house hold debt to governemnt debt? Its not the same . All governments  are  in debt. Surpluses are a furphy and are used to pork barrel. We need governments to spend not horde it.

Oh the Magic Money Theory (MMT).  Government debt doesn't matter because the government can just "print" more money, and spend as much of it as it wants.

One wonders why every African despot doesn't just get himself a laptop with and Excell spreadsheet and just keeping adding zero's to the national currency reserves.

Look up Hyerinflation in the Weimar republic to see where that leads.

Government debt matters because if you don't pay your debts, others will refuse to trade with you in your currency. See Greece.

At the other end, government debt is only a problem if you can't manage it ie you can't make the repayments and the borrowing costs are too highl.  But right now interest rates are low so its not a problem.  If they go up who knows?

Enzo Bearzot
Enzo Bearzot
Pro
Pro (4.8K reputation)Pro (4.8K reputation)Pro (4.8K reputation)Pro (4.8K reputation)Pro (4.8K reputation)Pro (4.8K reputation)Pro (4.8K reputation)Pro (4.8K reputation)Pro (4.8K reputation)Pro (4.8K reputation)Pro (4.8K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 4.5K, Visits: 0
MvFCArsenal16.8 - 17 Nov 2019 12:22 AM
mouflonrouge - 16 Nov 2019 10:45 PM
Again houseold debt is  nowhere the  same as government  debt you imbecile. Sustainbly borrow ? You mean give out grants to companies that go bankrupt ? Or dont need Grants  in the first place. 

Stop swallowing the Socialist Cool Aid .

Someone always has to pay, one way or the other.  Again See Greece.

But I don't expect Socialists to understand the concept of Paying For It,  because its always Someone Else's Money they spend, so it doesn't matter to them.  Until it does.

Carlito
Carlito
Legend
Legend (28K reputation)Legend (28K reputation)Legend (28K reputation)Legend (28K reputation)Legend (28K reputation)Legend (28K reputation)Legend (28K reputation)Legend (28K reputation)Legend (28K reputation)Legend (28K reputation)Legend (28K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 28K, Visits: 0
Enzo Bearzot - 17 Nov 2019 9:58 AM
MvFCArsenal16.8 - 17 Nov 2019 12:22 AM

Stop swallowing the Socialist Cool Aid .

Someone always has to pay, one way or the other.  Again See Greece.

But I don't expect Socialists to understand the concept of Paying For It,  because its always Someone Else's Money they spend, so it doesn't matter to them.  Until it does.

Lol you have no clue about  government  debt do you? Also we are not greece.  Unless you want the lnp  to borrow  over What They  can pay back. Even America  is in debt.  Spending  it on infrastructue , health ,education et el  is  needed and not hording  it to pork barrel people like you who only see oh money 
mouflonrouge
mouflonrouge
Pro
Pro (2.8K reputation)Pro (2.8K reputation)Pro (2.8K reputation)Pro (2.8K reputation)Pro (2.8K reputation)Pro (2.8K reputation)Pro (2.8K reputation)Pro (2.8K reputation)Pro (2.8K reputation)Pro (2.8K reputation)Pro (2.8K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 2.8K, Visits: 0
MvFCArsenal16.8 - 17 Nov 2019 11:26 AM
Enzo Bearzot - 17 Nov 2019 9:58 AM

Lol you have no clue about  government  debt do you? Also we are not greece.  Unless you want the lnp  to borrow  over What They  can pay back. Even America  is in debt.  Spending  it on infrastructue , health ,education et el  is  needed and not hording  it to pork barrel people like you who only see oh money 

Unbelievable! You actually think Greece and the other Eurozone economies have different rules when it comes to debt.

Every country has the potential to be a Greece. This country actually had better socialist programs than Australia did. It was very progressive in that it had a great pension system, free medical, university degrees were free and so on.

Now look what has happened.

It wasn't the only country of course - Spain, Portugal, Ireland and Cyprus were in the same boat.

And Italy is on the verge and hanging on only just.

The GFC hit many countries.

I just can't believe how delusional you guys are.

Please let me once again try and explain things to you in simple terms. You can only borrow for as long as you can service your debt. This applies to all countries. And even if you don't borrow and have a debt and go into recession, then the debt to GDP ratio increases. If you borrow on top of that, it increases further. And as the recession deepens, Government receipts tighten and decrease, thus reducing its ability to service its debt. This reduces the credit rating and increases the interest rate it needs to service, thus compounding things further.

If the debts are not serviced, then countries will not accept your trade in your currency because the risk is it will become worthless as inflation increases.

Then eventually, you have a meltdown and a banking crisis as property prices free fall, leaving all debts unsecured.

Don't ever believe it will not happen in Australia. A credit crunch is inevitable in ALL countries. But the more debt there is, and the bigger the deficit, the worse the calamity.

The Great Depression of the 1930s hit the global economy to point of famine. It WILL happen again.

Edited
6 Years Ago by mouflonrouge
LFC.
LFC.
Legend
Legend (13K reputation)Legend (13K reputation)Legend (13K reputation)Legend (13K reputation)Legend (13K reputation)Legend (13K reputation)Legend (13K reputation)Legend (13K reputation)Legend (13K reputation)Legend (13K reputation)Legend (13K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 13K, Visits: 0
paulbagzFC - 16 Nov 2019 10:23 PM
mouflonrouge - 16 Nov 2019 6:58 PM

Let me get this straight! You are accusing Trump of asking a foreign power to investigate his opponent now? 

Desperate to say the least.

Even if true, who cares? 
[/quote]

lol this thread has hit it's peak.

-PB
[/quote]

agreed, by those who only see their side of the politics.....no matter the dislike of Trump as a person and persona he is recovering alot that the Obama's and fellow leaders could/should have done.
The maths back him up them the facts but you can't please them all.


Love Football

mouflonrouge
mouflonrouge
Pro
Pro (2.8K reputation)Pro (2.8K reputation)Pro (2.8K reputation)Pro (2.8K reputation)Pro (2.8K reputation)Pro (2.8K reputation)Pro (2.8K reputation)Pro (2.8K reputation)Pro (2.8K reputation)Pro (2.8K reputation)Pro (2.8K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 2.8K, Visits: 0
LFC. - 17 Nov 2019 1:13 PM
paulbagzFC - 16 Nov 2019 10:23 PM

lol this thread has hit it's peak.

-PB
[/quote]

agreed, by those who only see their side of the politics.....no matter the dislike of Trump as a person and persona he is recovering alot that the Obama's and fellow leaders could/should have done.
The maths back him up them the facts but you can't please them all.
[/quote]

It's called Trump Derangement Syndrome.

People are just hating on Trump for the hell of it despite him putting the runs on the board.

It's actually quite sad how some people are so one eyed or brain washed.

Edited
6 Years Ago by mouflonrouge
Burztur
Burztur
World Class
World Class (9.4K reputation)World Class (9.4K reputation)World Class (9.4K reputation)World Class (9.4K reputation)World Class (9.4K reputation)World Class (9.4K reputation)World Class (9.4K reputation)World Class (9.4K reputation)World Class (9.4K reputation)World Class (9.4K reputation)World Class (9.4K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 9.1K, Visits: 0
Enzo Bearzot - 17 Nov 2019 9:44 AM
Burztur - 17 Nov 2019 7:02 AM

 If the US economy tanks under Trump you'll be blaming it all 100% on Trump.  But when it booms you want the Democrats to take credit for it.?  Yeah, nah.

The share markets went through the roof more or less immediately after he got in. 

Tarriffs don't work, right?  Wrong.  The Chines product now costs more so the US consumer might buy a competing product which is better value.  This hurts the Chinese.  If they buy the Chinese product anyway, the tax goes to the government and the money stays within the US to be spent on the US people.  Either way the Chinese need to come to the party rather than undercutting the world with cheap labor and at the same time opening ther markets to the world

Trump has more than enough positives he could claim his own in the election campaign, if he could only stop of engaging with the moronic far left Democrats.

One serious question. were you-and by you I mean all the other Trump haters-before I posted them actually aware of any of the economic performance under Trump figures above?

  Or will you just hate Trump and will do so no matter what?

You will see in all my other post that I acknowledge and recognise that the US economy is doing well under Trump. This is why I question whether people actually care about the Ukraine matter at the end of the day.
paulbagzFC
paulbagzFC
Legend
Legend (45K reputation)Legend (45K reputation)Legend (45K reputation)Legend (45K reputation)Legend (45K reputation)Legend (45K reputation)Legend (45K reputation)Legend (45K reputation)Legend (45K reputation)Legend (45K reputation)Legend (45K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 44K, Visits: 0
Enzo Bearzot - 17 Nov 2019 9:58 AM
MvFCArsenal16.8 - 17 Nov 2019 12:22 AM

Stop swallowing the Socialist Cool Aid .

Someone always has to pay, one way or the other.  Again See Greece.

But I don't expect Socialists to understand the concept of Paying For It,  because its always Someone Else's Money they spend, so it doesn't matter to them.  Until it does.

Are we playing conservative talking point bingo or something?

-PB

https://i.imgur.com/batge7K.jpg

sydneyfc1987
sydneyfc1987
Legend
Legend (11K reputation)Legend (11K reputation)Legend (11K reputation)Legend (11K reputation)Legend (11K reputation)Legend (11K reputation)Legend (11K reputation)Legend (11K reputation)Legend (11K reputation)Legend (11K reputation)Legend (11K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 10K, Visits: 0
paulbagzFC - 17 Nov 2019 9:17 PM
Enzo Bearzot - 17 Nov 2019 9:58 AM

Are we playing conservative talking point bingo or something?

-PB

I've never considered myself a "leftie" but Enzo and Moron make me feel like I've become one. 




(VAR) IS NAVY BLUE

Muz
Muz
Legend
Legend (16K reputation)Legend (16K reputation)Legend (16K reputation)Legend (16K reputation)Legend (16K reputation)Legend (16K reputation)Legend (16K reputation)Legend (16K reputation)Legend (16K reputation)Legend (16K reputation)Legend (16K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 15K, Visits: 0
Enzo wrote: 

Tarriffs don't work, right?  Wrong.  The Chines product now costs more so the US consumer might buy a competing product which is better value.  This hurts the Chinese.  If they buy the Chinese product anyway, the tax goes to the government and the money stays within the US to be spent on the US people.  Either way the Chinese need to come to the party rather than undercutting the world with cheap labor and at the same time opening ther markets to the world
 


You are so ridiculous.  If Labour wanted to introduce tariffs you'd be calling them communists for wanting to interfere in the free market but when Trump does it well that's OK.  Trump loves telling everyone he's taxing the Chinese but tariffs are a tax on US consumers.  It's just that his supporters are too dopey to understand how tariffs actually work. 


Enzo wrote:

One serious question. Were you-and by you I mean all the other Trump haters-before I posted them actually aware of any of the economic performance under Trump figures above?

 Or will you just hate Trump and will do so no matter what?



As for your other 'facts' about Trump and the economy try these articles on for size.

https://www.marketwatch.com/story/trump-didnt-transform-the-economy-its-mostly-the-same-as-it-was-under-obama-2019-11-12
https://www.salon.com/2019/07/09/another-broken-promise-job-creation-under-trump-trails-obama-by-800000/
https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/us-politics/trump-obama-jobs-numbers-economy-meet-the-press-a8971181.html
https://www.factcheck.org/2019/11/trumps-economic-falsehoods/
https://www.forbes.com/sites/chuckjones/2019/07/05/trump-is-falling-almost-1-million-jobs-short-vs-obama/#b868bf48caa7
https://www.washingtonpost.com/business/2019/08/20/trump-v-obama-economy-charts/
http://www.msnbc.com/rachel-maddow-show/job-growth-remains-steady-totals-have-slipped-under-trump

Long story short Trump is riding on Obama's coat tails or if you prefer is doing worse on just about every measure..

One little pertinent excerpt for you Enzo seeing you love to quote stock market gains though you can read all about the others if you'd care to inform yourself.

The Dow Jones industrial average was up 46 per cent at this point in Obama's presidency versus 25 per cent for Trump. Stocks soared under Obama, and he ended his White House tenure with one of the best gains of any president in modern history. Trump started out with a lot of love from Wall Street as well, especially with his tax cut, but stocks have moved sideways since he began his trade war.

What is it that your demagogue says?  "Facts don't care about your 'feelings' ".

That's right, they don't.




Member since 2008.


Edited
6 Years Ago by Munrubenmuz
mouflonrouge
mouflonrouge
Pro
Pro (2.8K reputation)Pro (2.8K reputation)Pro (2.8K reputation)Pro (2.8K reputation)Pro (2.8K reputation)Pro (2.8K reputation)Pro (2.8K reputation)Pro (2.8K reputation)Pro (2.8K reputation)Pro (2.8K reputation)Pro (2.8K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 2.8K, Visits: 0
sydneyfc1987 - 17 Nov 2019 10:39 PM
paulbagzFC - 17 Nov 2019 9:17 PM

I've never considered myself a "leftie" but Enzo and Moron make me feel like I've become one. 



You have the scatter brain of one!

mouflonrouge
mouflonrouge
Pro
Pro (2.8K reputation)Pro (2.8K reputation)Pro (2.8K reputation)Pro (2.8K reputation)Pro (2.8K reputation)Pro (2.8K reputation)Pro (2.8K reputation)Pro (2.8K reputation)Pro (2.8K reputation)Pro (2.8K reputation)Pro (2.8K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 2.8K, Visits: 0
Munrubenmuz - 17 Nov 2019 11:08 PM
Enzo wrote: 

Tarriffs don't work, right?  Wrong.  The Chines product now costs more so the US consumer might buy a competing product which is better value.  This hurts the Chinese.  If they buy the Chinese product anyway, the tax goes to the government and the money stays within the US to be spent on the US people.  Either way the Chinese need to come to the party rather than undercutting the world with cheap labor and at the same time opening ther markets to the world
 


You are so ridiculous.  If Labour wanted to introduce tariffs you'd be calling them communists for wanting to interfere in the free market but when Trump does it well that's OK.  Trump loves telling everyone he's taxing the Chinese but tariffs are a tax on US consumers.  It's just that his supporters are too dopey to understand how tariffs actually work. 


Enzo wrote:

One serious question. Were you-and by you I mean all the other Trump haters-before I posted them actually aware of any of the economic performance under Trump figures above?

 Or will you just hate Trump and will do so no matter what?



As for your other 'facts' about Trump and the economy try these articles on for size.

https://www.marketwatch.com/story/trump-didnt-transform-the-economy-its-mostly-the-same-as-it-was-under-obama-2019-11-12
https://www.salon.com/2019/07/09/another-broken-promise-job-creation-under-trump-trails-obama-by-800000/
https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/us-politics/trump-obama-jobs-numbers-economy-meet-the-press-a8971181.html
https://www.factcheck.org/2019/11/trumps-economic-falsehoods/
https://www.forbes.com/sites/chuckjones/2019/07/05/trump-is-falling-almost-1-million-jobs-short-vs-obama/#b868bf48caa7
https://www.washingtonpost.com/business/2019/08/20/trump-v-obama-economy-charts/
http://www.msnbc.com/rachel-maddow-show/job-growth-remains-steady-totals-have-slipped-under-trump

Long story short Trump is riding on Obama's coat tails or if you prefer is doing worse on just about every measure..

One little pertinent excerpt for you Enzo seeing you love to quote stock market gains though you can read all about the others if you'd care to inform yourself.

The Dow Jones industrial average was up 46 per cent at this point in Obama's presidency versus 25 per cent for Trump. Stocks soared under Obama, and he ended his White House tenure with one of the best gains of any president in modern history. Trump started out with a lot of love from Wall Street as well, especially with his tax cut, but stocks have moved sideways since he began his trade war.

What is it that your demagogue says?  "Facts don't care about your 'feelings' ".

That's right, they don't.


Obama never achieved a single thing for the economy. In fact the opposite was true. He handed over an economy that was not in the best of shape to say the least.

BTW, Obama should have introduced tariffs for Chinese products just to give US manufacturing a chance. Australia should have done the same as well.

Problem is no one has been willing to apart from Trump and it has paid off too. Trump is kicking a lot of goals,

He has the Golden Boot in the bag!

433
433
World Class
World Class (6.9K reputation)World Class (6.9K reputation)World Class (6.9K reputation)World Class (6.9K reputation)World Class (6.9K reputation)World Class (6.9K reputation)World Class (6.9K reputation)World Class (6.9K reputation)World Class (6.9K reputation)World Class (6.9K reputation)World Class (6.9K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 6.7K, Visits: 0
I honestly wouldn't bother Muz, you're talking to a bloke who thinks the central bank set the exchange rate. You'd make more productive use of your time headbutting a brick wall repeatedly. 
mouflonrouge
mouflonrouge
Pro
Pro (2.8K reputation)Pro (2.8K reputation)Pro (2.8K reputation)Pro (2.8K reputation)Pro (2.8K reputation)Pro (2.8K reputation)Pro (2.8K reputation)Pro (2.8K reputation)Pro (2.8K reputation)Pro (2.8K reputation)Pro (2.8K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 2.8K, Visits: 0
433 - 18 Nov 2019 12:40 AM
I honestly wouldn't bother Muz, you're talking to a bloke who thinks the central bank set the exchange rate. You'd make more productive use of your time headbutting a brick wall repeatedly. 

Who thinks that?



433
433
World Class
World Class (6.9K reputation)World Class (6.9K reputation)World Class (6.9K reputation)World Class (6.9K reputation)World Class (6.9K reputation)World Class (6.9K reputation)World Class (6.9K reputation)World Class (6.9K reputation)World Class (6.9K reputation)World Class (6.9K reputation)World Class (6.9K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 6.7K, Visits: 0
mouflonrouge - 18 Nov 2019 9:54 AM
433 - 18 Nov 2019 12:40 AM

Who thinks that?

You, page 744 of the Auspol thread.

If you actually look into it, the RBA was not setting interest rates in Australia because the AUD wasn't floated at the time. It was floated by Keating.


You appear to not understand the difference between the interest rate and an exchange rate. 
Enzo Bearzot
Enzo Bearzot
Pro
Pro (4.8K reputation)Pro (4.8K reputation)Pro (4.8K reputation)Pro (4.8K reputation)Pro (4.8K reputation)Pro (4.8K reputation)Pro (4.8K reputation)Pro (4.8K reputation)Pro (4.8K reputation)Pro (4.8K reputation)Pro (4.8K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 4.5K, Visits: 0
Munrubenmuz - 17 Nov 2019 11:08 PM
Enzo wrote: 

Tarriffs don't work, right?  Wrong.  The Chines product now costs more so the US consumer might buy a competing product which is better value.  This hurts the Chinese.  If they buy the Chinese product anyway, the tax goes to the government and the money stays within the US to be spent on the US people.  Either way the Chinese need to come to the party rather than undercutting the world with cheap labor and at the same time opening ther markets to the world
 


You are so ridiculous.  If Labour wanted to introduce tariffs you'd be calling them communists for wanting to interfere in the free market but when Trump does it well that's OK.  Trump loves telling everyone he's taxing the Chinese but tariffs are a tax on US consumers.  It's just that his supporters are too dopey to understand how tariffs actually work. 


Enzo wrote:

One serious question. Were you-and by you I mean all the other Trump haters-before I posted them actually aware of any of the economic performance under Trump figures above?

 Or will you just hate Trump and will do so no matter what?



As for your other 'facts' about Trump and the economy try these articles on for size.

https://www.marketwatch.com/story/trump-didnt-transform-the-economy-its-mostly-the-same-as-it-was-under-obama-2019-11-12
https://www.salon.com/2019/07/09/another-broken-promise-job-creation-under-trump-trails-obama-by-800000/
https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/us-politics/trump-obama-jobs-numbers-economy-meet-the-press-a8971181.html
https://www.factcheck.org/2019/11/trumps-economic-falsehoods/
https://www.forbes.com/sites/chuckjones/2019/07/05/trump-is-falling-almost-1-million-jobs-short-vs-obama/#b868bf48caa7
https://www.washingtonpost.com/business/2019/08/20/trump-v-obama-economy-charts/
http://www.msnbc.com/rachel-maddow-show/job-growth-remains-steady-totals-have-slipped-under-trump

Long story short Trump is riding on Obama's coat tails or if you prefer is doing worse on just about every measure..

One little pertinent excerpt for you Enzo seeing you love to quote stock market gains though you can read all about the others if you'd care to inform yourself.

The Dow Jones industrial average was up 46 per cent at this point in Obama's presidency versus 25 per cent for Trump. Stocks soared under Obama, and he ended his White House tenure with one of the best gains of any president in modern history. Trump started out with a lot of love from Wall Street as well, especially with his tax cut, but stocks have moved sideways since he began his trade war.

What is it that your demagogue says?  "Facts don't care about your 'feelings' ".

That's right, they don't.


Trump riding on Obama's coat tail? What a joke.. The old government gets 6 months credit and the new one 6 months grace.  That's politics.

The reason why the jobs growth is slowing is because there aren't enough PEOPLE to fill them!. Its basically FULL employment under Trump!

Oh and my how the Lefties do LOVE their percentages!  In Jan 2009 when Obama was elected, the Dow was sitting on 8000 points.  In 2013 it was up to 15000 points, a gain of 7000.  When Trump got in in 2016 it was 17,000.  Its now at 28,000 a gain of 11000 points.  Don't give me percentages.  A doubling of something smaller is still something smaller.

Edited
6 Years Ago by Enzo Bearzot
GO


Select a Forum....























Inside Sport


Search