mouflonrouge
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 2.8K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+x+x[quote]I'm sure those tax cuts that overwhelmingly went to the rich and allowed companies to buyback their own stocks really helped the little guys. If you honestly believe that Trump is some Gracchi-type tribune of the plebs then you're a fucking gullible moron that fell for his faux-populist rhetoric. Policy outcomes don't really matter at all, it's all about aesthetics and appearing as though you care about the little guy. Why re you resorting to insults? I Do you have ANY idea of what the policy outcomes have been under Trump for the plebs Or is it that you hate Trump and follow what Hollywood, New York and Washington Media tell you and that's as far as you go?FYI: - 6 million jobs added - 500,000 manufacturing jobs added - lowest unemployment in 51 years - 7.6 million job vacancies ie more jobs than people to fill them - Blacks and Hispanics leading the job growth figures, with female Hispanics leading the way - The percentage of Americans living with income below the official poverty line went down to 11.8% of the population in 2018, the lowest level since 2001. - weekly earnings up 2.3 in rel terms - economic growth rate up 2% - food stamp recipients down 15% - 90% more Mexican border apprehensions (there's your Wall) - Home prices up 22% - Home ownership up - Stocks up 30 % - corporate profits up 7% - handgun production down 23% Any fool can spend their way out of trouble. Borrow trillions, give tax cuts left, right and centre and then fuck off into the sunset and let the next bloke worry about it. https://www.washingtonpost.com/business/2019/10/25/us-deficit-hit-billion-marking-nearly-percent-increase-during-trump-era/If you think that's a left wing rag then how about Fox. https://www.foxnews.com/us/us-trade-gap-jumped-to-10-year-high-record-gap-with-chinaor this https://www.foxnews.com/politics/deficits-exploding-and-neither-party-seems-to-careor this https://www.foxnews.com/politics/govt-agency-predicts-trillion-dollar-deficits-for-the-foreseeable-futurethere's dozens of others if you'd care to educate yourself. Tax cuts, spending, and government borrowing money at record low interest is good for the economy More jobs, pay rises, home ownership, more economic opportunity for marginalized groups.less poverty, less crime See previous post on how that looks right now in the US.. If Labour spent like that you'd have a conniption but because Trump....reasons... Have I got that right? How many times have you banged on about Labour spending all of the government's surpluses and wasting the money saved and kicking the can down the road etc etc only for others to have to pick up the bill but for some bizarro reason it's OK for Trump to do it. The is ok for Trump to do? Can you provide an example of Trump increasing the spending deficit please?
|
|
|
|
mouflonrouge
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 2.8K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x[quote]Democrats haven't learnt their lesson from last time if they pick Biden. Not as unlikable as Hilary but not far off. Bernie ftw Bernie is too socialist for Americans. Like here people say they are left leaning but cant or won't vote for someone who is too left I just want to see someone who appears to be a genuine person that cares about the country get a crack. Put in another middle of the road career politician like Biden, like Hilary, and trump will have a field day. The reality is most vote on personality rather than policy. Yup. I think 2/3rds of Trump supporters are rusted on regardless of if the Ukraine scandal is an abuse of power or not. I wonder whether the remaining 1/3 would change their vote because of it. No chance there! No one is taking the Ukraine allegations seriously. I keep telling everyone, the be Trump Derangement Syndrome, the more actual support for Trump. Trump seems to be taking it seriously with the number of tweets and reactions. Donald Trump is a buffoon however I can't see anything he has done be it Russia or Ukraine that would justify impeachment. If he is the buffoon, what are his opponents? I think applying the 'but what about xxxxx' principle doesn't apply here. Democrats are corrupt pieces of shit however Trump acts & behaves like a buffoon, whether he does it to fuck with people or whatever however it can't be denied. I beg to differ. Trump has behaved like a true Statesman here, always being prepared to make the tough decisions. Right now, the US economy is performing well and Trump has not been the disaster everyone said he would be but rather he has been a breath of fresh air and has made sound decisions. he has even had meetings with South Korea's "supreme Leader" always preferring dialogue over confrontation that could lead to way and he has been more than willing to hold others accountable. He hasn't put a foot wrong. Trump is fast becomming the benchmark. At least acknowledge the difference between north and south. I can only acknowledge the difference between New York, LA and Chicago to the real America on the rust-belts. That's the thing here isn't it. Everyone has abandoned the battler and the working class and also saying they are STUPID! I don’t think the forum is that polarised. There is a strong base for Trump from disenfranchised voters. The economy is doing well right now and he could very well retain power. That is once again very flippant. You said that his supporter base is disenfranchised. Might as well call them silly stupid people like all the other times. Trump was voted for because he was an alternative to the establishment and the people needed a champion that would represent them rather than just give them jingoistic promises. Yes the economy is doing well because Trump policies are actually not that bad. He has done a lot. That’s what I mean by disenfranchised. OK so you understand then what is going on here, that the masses who voted against the ALP or the Democrats in the USA are the very battlers and working class majorities tryig to put bread on the table. The people who feel betrayed by what is now the looney left and jingoistic feel good, virtue signalers. Why do you still consider the Trumps as being bad when they are the only ones listening to the battlers? I don’t think Trump is the only one listening to the battlers. I would say he is abusing his power for personal gain and that’s most obvious with the Ukraine incident. The question is, do enough people care? Maybe, maybe not. What the hell is the son of someone running for President doing in Ukraine anyway? Its a former Soviet nation who was in conflict with the Russians. We're to believe only he could do that job? Ignorance is a choice so perhaps you could get yourself up to speed here as to why he was there. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hunter_BidenIrrespective of your politics though in what sort of alternate reality that you live in is it acceptable to ask a foreign power to investigate your opponent? He, by his own admission, openly asked a foreign power to interfere in the domestic politics of the US. If Anthony Albanese or Bill Shorten did that then they should go to jail no questions asked. If Hillary did that they'd be calling for a lynching in the streets. LOL It was a terrible decision for Bidens son to be there. Don't believe me, believe the horses mouth: https://time.com/5700615/hunter-biden-joe-poor-judgment/Oh and we move on the impeachment: Here's a running tally of the witnesses presented so far. 1. Taylor ( The Dems Star Witness) and Kent: "The problem with Taylor and Kent's testimony is that Trump remained a peripheral and largely mysterious figure throughout" https://www.theage.com.au/world/north-america/impeachment-hearings-damning-for-trump-but-lacks-fireworks-democrats-need-20191114-p53ah7.html2. Marie Yovanovitch "Her testimony alone would not be sufficient grounds for impeachment" https://www.smh.com.au/world/north-america/trump-s-tweeting-turns-a-bad-day-into-a-disaster-20191116-p53b6b.htmlOne Nothing Burger for the Dems, coming right up! Whether Biden should have been there is moot. Trump asked a foreign government to investigate his opponent. In times gone by decent members of his own party would have forced him to resign. Because you ignored my question I'll ask you again..... Irrespective of your politics though in what sort of alternate reality that you live in is it acceptable to ask a foreign power to investigate your opponent? He, by his own admission, openly asked a foreign power to interfere in the domestic politics of the US.
[/quote] Let me get this straight! You are accusing Trump of asking a foreign power to investigate his opponent now? Desperate to say the least. Even if true, who cares?
|
|
|
Enzo Bearzot
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 4.5K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+xDemocrats haven't learnt their lesson from last time if they pick Biden. Not as unlikable as Hilary but not far off. Bernie ftw Bernie is too socialist for Americans. Like here people say they are left leaning but cant or won't vote for someone who is too left I just want to see someone who appears to be a genuine person that cares about the country get a crack. Put in another middle of the road career politician like Biden, like Hilary, and trump will have a field day. The reality is most vote on personality rather than policy. Yup. I think 2/3rds of Trump supporters are rusted on regardless of if the Ukraine scandal is an abuse of power or not. I wonder whether the remaining 1/3 would change their vote because of it. No chance there! No one is taking the Ukraine allegations seriously. I keep telling everyone, the be Trump Derangement Syndrome, the more actual support for Trump. Trump seems to be taking it seriously with the number of tweets and reactions. Donald Trump is a buffoon however I can't see anything he has done be it Russia or Ukraine that would justify impeachment. If he is the buffoon, what are his opponents? I think applying the 'but what about xxxxx' principle doesn't apply here. Democrats are corrupt pieces of shit however Trump acts & behaves like a buffoon, whether he does it to fuck with people or whatever however it can't be denied. I beg to differ. Trump has behaved like a true Statesman here, always being prepared to make the tough decisions. Right now, the US economy is performing well and Trump has not been the disaster everyone said he would be but rather he has been a breath of fresh air and has made sound decisions. he has even had meetings with South Korea's "supreme Leader" always preferring dialogue over confrontation that could lead to way and he has been more than willing to hold others accountable. He hasn't put a foot wrong. Trump is fast becomming the benchmark. At least acknowledge the difference between north and south. I can only acknowledge the difference between New York, LA and Chicago to the real America on the rust-belts. That's the thing here isn't it. Everyone has abandoned the battler and the working class and also saying they are STUPID! I don’t think the forum is that polarised. There is a strong base for Trump from disenfranchised voters. The economy is doing well right now and he could very well retain power. That is once again very flippant. You said that his supporter base is disenfranchised. Might as well call them silly stupid people like all the other times. Trump was voted for because he was an alternative to the establishment and the people needed a champion that would represent them rather than just give them jingoistic promises. Yes the economy is doing well because Trump policies are actually not that bad. He has done a lot. That’s what I mean by disenfranchised. OK so you understand then what is going on here, that the masses who voted against the ALP or the Democrats in the USA are the very battlers and working class majorities tryig to put bread on the table. The people who feel betrayed by what is now the looney left and jingoistic feel good, virtue signalers. Why do you still consider the Trumps as being bad when they are the only ones listening to the battlers? I don’t think Trump is the only one listening to the battlers. I would say he is abusing his power for personal gain and that’s most obvious with the Ukraine incident. The question is, do enough people care? Maybe, maybe not. What the hell is the son of someone running for President doing in Ukraine anyway? Its a former Soviet nation who was in conflict with the Russians. We're to believe only he could do that job? Ignorance is a choice so perhaps you could get yourself up to speed here as to why he was there. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hunter_BidenIrrespective of your politics though in what sort of alternate reality that you live in is it acceptable to ask a foreign power to investigate your opponent? He, by his own admission, openly asked a foreign power to interfere in the domestic politics of the US. If Anthony Albanese or Bill Shorten did that then they should go to jail no questions asked. If Hillary did that they'd be calling for a lynching in the streets. As it stands the evidence against Trump is not impeachable.
|
|
|
Enzo Bearzot
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 4.5K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+x+x[quote]I'm sure those tax cuts that overwhelmingly went to the rich and allowed companies to buyback their own stocks really helped the little guys. If you honestly believe that Trump is some Gracchi-type tribune of the plebs then you're a fucking gullible moron that fell for his faux-populist rhetoric. Policy outcomes don't really matter at all, it's all about aesthetics and appearing as though you care about the little guy. Why re you resorting to insults? I Do you have ANY idea of what the policy outcomes have been under Trump for the plebs Or is it that you hate Trump and follow what Hollywood, New York and Washington Media tell you and that's as far as you go?FYI: - 6 million jobs added - 500,000 manufacturing jobs added - lowest unemployment in 51 years - 7.6 million job vacancies ie more jobs than people to fill them - Blacks and Hispanics leading the job growth figures, with female Hispanics leading the way - The percentage of Americans living with income below the official poverty line went down to 11.8% of the population in 2018, the lowest level since 2001. - weekly earnings up 2.3 in rel terms - economic growth rate up 2% - food stamp recipients down 15% - 90% more Mexican border apprehensions (there's your Wall) - Home prices up 22% - Home ownership up - Stocks up 30 % - corporate profits up 7% - handgun production down 23% Any fool can spend their way out of trouble. Borrow trillions, give tax cuts left, right and centre and then fuck off into the sunset and let the next bloke worry about it. https://www.washingtonpost.com/business/2019/10/25/us-deficit-hit-billion-marking-nearly-percent-increase-during-trump-era/If you think that's a left wing rag then how about Fox. https://www.foxnews.com/us/us-trade-gap-jumped-to-10-year-high-record-gap-with-chinaor this https://www.foxnews.com/politics/deficits-exploding-and-neither-party-seems-to-careor this https://www.foxnews.com/politics/govt-agency-predicts-trillion-dollar-deficits-for-the-foreseeable-futurethere's dozens of others if you'd care to educate yourself. Tax cuts, spending, and government borrowing money at record low interest is good for the economy More jobs, pay rises, home ownership, more economic opportunity for marginalized groups.less poverty, less crime See previous post on how that looks right now in the US.. If Labour spent like that you'd have a conniption but because Trump....reasons... Have I got that right? How many times have you banged on about Labour spending all of the government's surpluses and wasting the money saved and kicking the can down the road etc etc only for others to have to pick up the bill but for some bizarro reason it's OK for Trump to do it. 1.What is a surplus-its the government taxing more than they needed to run the country. I hate giving a cent more of my money to government than I am required to do, so a surplus?. F that. 2. There is good debt and bad debt. You borrow to buy a house=good debt. To start a business=good debt but more risk. Labor doesn't understand teh difference between good and bad debt. To them, its Someone Else's Money, so who cares?
|
|
|
Carlito
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 28K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+x+x+x[quote]I'm sure those tax cuts that overwhelmingly went to the rich and allowed companies to buyback their own stocks really helped the little guys. If you honestly believe that Trump is some Gracchi-type tribune of the plebs then you're a fucking gullible moron that fell for his faux-populist rhetoric. Policy outcomes don't really matter at all, it's all about aesthetics and appearing as though you care about the little guy. Why re you resorting to insults? I Do you have ANY idea of what the policy outcomes have been under Trump for the plebs Or is it that you hate Trump and follow what Hollywood, New York and Washington Media tell you and that's as far as you go?FYI: - 6 million jobs added - 500,000 manufacturing jobs added - lowest unemployment in 51 years - 7.6 million job vacancies ie more jobs than people to fill them - Blacks and Hispanics leading the job growth figures, with female Hispanics leading the way - The percentage of Americans living with income below the official poverty line went down to 11.8% of the population in 2018, the lowest level since 2001. - weekly earnings up 2.3 in rel terms - economic growth rate up 2% - food stamp recipients down 15% - 90% more Mexican border apprehensions (there's your Wall) - Home prices up 22% - Home ownership up - Stocks up 30 % - corporate profits up 7% - handgun production down 23% Any fool can spend their way out of trouble. Borrow trillions, give tax cuts left, right and centre and then fuck off into the sunset and let the next bloke worry about it. https://www.washingtonpost.com/business/2019/10/25/us-deficit-hit-billion-marking-nearly-percent-increase-during-trump-era/If you think that's a left wing rag then how about Fox. https://www.foxnews.com/us/us-trade-gap-jumped-to-10-year-high-record-gap-with-chinaor this https://www.foxnews.com/politics/deficits-exploding-and-neither-party-seems-to-careor this https://www.foxnews.com/politics/govt-agency-predicts-trillion-dollar-deficits-for-the-foreseeable-futurethere's dozens of others if you'd care to educate yourself. Tax cuts, spending, and government borrowing money at record low interest is good for the economy More jobs, pay rises, home ownership, more economic opportunity for marginalized groups.less poverty, less crime See previous post on how that looks right now in the US.. If Labour spent like that you'd have a conniption but because Trump....reasons... Have I got that right? How many times have you banged on about Labour spending all of the government's surpluses and wasting the money saved and kicking the can down the road etc etc only for others to have to pick up the bill but for some bizarro reason it's OK for Trump to do it. 1.What is a surplus-its the government taxing more than they needed to run the country. I hate giving a cent more of my money to government than I am required to do, so a surplus?. F that. 2. There is good debt and bad debt. You borrow to buy a house=good debt. To start a business=good debt but more risk. Labor doesn't understand teh difference between good and bad debt. To them, its Someone Else's Money, so who cares? Are You seriously equalling house hold debt to governemnt debt? Its not the same . All governments are in debt. Surpluses are a furphy and are used to pork barrel. We need governments to spend not horde it.
|
|
|
mouflonrouge
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 2.8K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+x+x+x+x[quote]I'm sure those tax cuts that overwhelmingly went to the rich and allowed companies to buyback their own stocks really helped the little guys. If you honestly believe that Trump is some Gracchi-type tribune of the plebs then you're a fucking gullible moron that fell for his faux-populist rhetoric. Policy outcomes don't really matter at all, it's all about aesthetics and appearing as though you care about the little guy. Why re you resorting to insults? I Do you have ANY idea of what the policy outcomes have been under Trump for the plebs Or is it that you hate Trump and follow what Hollywood, New York and Washington Media tell you and that's as far as you go?FYI: - 6 million jobs added - 500,000 manufacturing jobs added - lowest unemployment in 51 years - 7.6 million job vacancies ie more jobs than people to fill them - Blacks and Hispanics leading the job growth figures, with female Hispanics leading the way - The percentage of Americans living with income below the official poverty line went down to 11.8% of the population in 2018, the lowest level since 2001. - weekly earnings up 2.3 in rel terms - economic growth rate up 2% - food stamp recipients down 15% - 90% more Mexican border apprehensions (there's your Wall) - Home prices up 22% - Home ownership up - Stocks up 30 % - corporate profits up 7% - handgun production down 23% Any fool can spend their way out of trouble. Borrow trillions, give tax cuts left, right and centre and then fuck off into the sunset and let the next bloke worry about it. https://www.washingtonpost.com/business/2019/10/25/us-deficit-hit-billion-marking-nearly-percent-increase-during-trump-era/If you think that's a left wing rag then how about Fox. https://www.foxnews.com/us/us-trade-gap-jumped-to-10-year-high-record-gap-with-chinaor this https://www.foxnews.com/politics/deficits-exploding-and-neither-party-seems-to-careor this https://www.foxnews.com/politics/govt-agency-predicts-trillion-dollar-deficits-for-the-foreseeable-futurethere's dozens of others if you'd care to educate yourself. Tax cuts, spending, and government borrowing money at record low interest is good for the economy More jobs, pay rises, home ownership, more economic opportunity for marginalized groups.less poverty, less crime See previous post on how that looks right now in the US.. If Labour spent like that you'd have a conniption but because Trump....reasons... Have I got that right? How many times have you banged on about Labour spending all of the government's surpluses and wasting the money saved and kicking the can down the road etc etc only for others to have to pick up the bill but for some bizarro reason it's OK for Trump to do it. 1.What is a surplus-its the government taxing more than they needed to run the country. I hate giving a cent more of my money to government than I am required to do, so a surplus?. F that. 2. There is good debt and bad debt. You borrow to buy a house=good debt. To start a business=good debt but more risk. Labor doesn't understand teh difference between good and bad debt. To them, its Someone Else's Money, so who cares? Are You seriously equalling house hold debt to governemnt debt? Its not the same . All governments are in debt. Surpluses are a furphy and are used to pork barrel. We need governments to spend not horde it. Have you ever heard of Greece, Portugal, Spain, Ireland and Italy? The so called PIGS? They didn't horde it and now they have the most awful austerity ever inflicted on any population and 30% unemployment. No, what you say is incredible irresponsible. Governments are only able to spend what is sustainable. There should be a surplus preferably, but if there isn't they can only spend in proportion to projected growth and if they do not or there is a downturn or financial crisis and they remain in debt, then look out. It isn't a good thing. And those who suffer the most are the poor. You can only borrow if you know your GDP is increasing. If your GDP isn't increasing then your debt to GDP ratio increases and eventually it will become unmanageable to the point where the State cant make payments. Tax isn't an endless tap either because what happens is that business tightens its belts, sacks workers and stops investing. And because there is less employment, there is less tax for the state and things go from bad to worse. Also Corporate profits decline, resulting in even less tax revenue for the State. But these are concepts the left does not understand. After all, you don't want a State to horde it. Just spend spend and spend till we collapse. And collapse we will just like Venezuela. Look, economics isn't your forte. Stick to the A League sunshine! Stick to the A League.
|
|
|
paulbagzFC
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 44K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x[quote]+x[quote]Democrats haven't learnt their lesson from last time if they pick Biden. Not as unlikable as Hilary but not far off. Bernie ftw Bernie is too socialist for Americans. Like here people say they are left leaning but cant or won't vote for someone who is too left I just want to see someone who appears to be a genuine person that cares about the country get a crack. Put in another middle of the road career politician like Biden, like Hilary, and trump will have a field day. The reality is most vote on personality rather than policy. Yup. I think 2/3rds of Trump supporters are rusted on regardless of if the Ukraine scandal is an abuse of power or not. I wonder whether the remaining 1/3 would change their vote because of it. No chance there! No one is taking the Ukraine allegations seriously. I keep telling everyone, the be Trump Derangement Syndrome, the more actual support for Trump. Trump seems to be taking it seriously with the number of tweets and reactions. Donald Trump is a buffoon however I can't see anything he has done be it Russia or Ukraine that would justify impeachment. If he is the buffoon, what are his opponents? I think applying the 'but what about xxxxx' principle doesn't apply here. Democrats are corrupt pieces of shit however Trump acts & behaves like a buffoon, whether he does it to fuck with people or whatever however it can't be denied. I beg to differ. Trump has behaved like a true Statesman here, always being prepared to make the tough decisions. Right now, the US economy is performing well and Trump has not been the disaster everyone said he would be but rather he has been a breath of fresh air and has made sound decisions. he has even had meetings with South Korea's "supreme Leader" always preferring dialogue over confrontation that could lead to way and he has been more than willing to hold others accountable. He hasn't put a foot wrong. Trump is fast becomming the benchmark. At least acknowledge the difference between north and south. I can only acknowledge the difference between New York, LA and Chicago to the real America on the rust-belts. That's the thing here isn't it. Everyone has abandoned the battler and the working class and also saying they are STUPID! I don’t think the forum is that polarised. There is a strong base for Trump from disenfranchised voters. The economy is doing well right now and he could very well retain power. That is once again very flippant. You said that his supporter base is disenfranchised. Might as well call them silly stupid people like all the other times. Trump was voted for because he was an alternative to the establishment and the people needed a champion that would represent them rather than just give them jingoistic promises. Yes the economy is doing well because Trump policies are actually not that bad. He has done a lot. That’s what I mean by disenfranchised. OK so you understand then what is going on here, that the masses who voted against the ALP or the Democrats in the USA are the very battlers and working class majorities tryig to put bread on the table. The people who feel betrayed by what is now the looney left and jingoistic feel good, virtue signalers. Why do you still consider the Trumps as being bad when they are the only ones listening to the battlers? I don’t think Trump is the only one listening to the battlers. I would say he is abusing his power for personal gain and that’s most obvious with the Ukraine incident. The question is, do enough people care? Maybe, maybe not. What the hell is the son of someone running for President doing in Ukraine anyway? Its a former Soviet nation who was in conflict with the Russians. We're to believe only he could do that job? Ignorance is a choice so perhaps you could get yourself up to speed here as to why he was there. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hunter_BidenIrrespective of your politics though in what sort of alternate reality that you live in is it acceptable to ask a foreign power to investigate your opponent? He, by his own admission, openly asked a foreign power to interfere in the domestic politics of the US. If Anthony Albanese or Bill Shorten did that then they should go to jail no questions asked. If Hillary did that they'd be calling for a lynching in the streets. LOL It was a terrible decision for Bidens son to be there. Don't believe me, believe the horses mouth: https://time.com/5700615/hunter-biden-joe-poor-judgment/Oh and we move on the impeachment: Here's a running tally of the witnesses presented so far. 1. Taylor ( The Dems Star Witness) and Kent: "The problem with Taylor and Kent's testimony is that Trump remained a peripheral and largely mysterious figure throughout" https://www.theage.com.au/world/north-america/impeachment-hearings-damning-for-trump-but-lacks-fireworks-democrats-need-20191114-p53ah7.html2. Marie Yovanovitch "Her testimony alone would not be sufficient grounds for impeachment" https://www.smh.com.au/world/north-america/trump-s-tweeting-turns-a-bad-day-into-a-disaster-20191116-p53b6b.htmlOne Nothing Burger for the Dems, coming right up! Whether Biden should have been there is moot. Trump asked a foreign government to investigate his opponent. In times gone by decent members of his own party would have forced him to resign. Because you ignored my question I'll ask you again..... Irrespective of your politics though in what sort of alternate reality that you live in is it acceptable to ask a foreign power to investigate your opponent? He, by his own admission, openly asked a foreign power to interfere in the domestic politics of the US.
[/quote]Let me get this straight! You are accusing Trump of asking a foreign power to investigate his opponent now? Desperate to say the least. Even if true, who cares? [/quote] lol this thread has hit it's peak. -PB
|
|
|
mouflonrouge
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 2.8K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x[quote]+x[quote]+x[quote]Democrats haven't learnt their lesson from last time if they pick Biden. Not as unlikable as Hilary but not far off. Bernie ftw Bernie is too socialist for Americans. Like here people say they are left leaning but cant or won't vote for someone who is too left I just want to see someone who appears to be a genuine person that cares about the country get a crack. Put in another middle of the road career politician like Biden, like Hilary, and trump will have a field day. The reality is most vote on personality rather than policy. Yup. I think 2/3rds of Trump supporters are rusted on regardless of if the Ukraine scandal is an abuse of power or not.
I wonder whether the remaining 1/3 would change their vote because of it. No chance there!
No one is taking the Ukraine allegations seriously. I keep telling everyone, the be Trump Derangement Syndrome, the more actual support for Trump.
Trump seems to be taking it seriously with the number of tweets and reactions.
Donald Trump is a buffoon however I can't see anything he has done be it Russia or Ukraine that would justify impeachment.
If he is the buffoon, what are his opponents?
I think applying the 'but what about xxxxx' principle doesn't apply here. Democrats are corrupt pieces of shit however Trump acts & behaves like a buffoon, whether he does it to fuck with people or whatever however it can't be denied. I beg to differ.
Trump has behaved like a true Statesman here, always being prepared to make the tough decisions. Right now, the US economy is performing well and Trump has not been the disaster everyone said he would be but rather he has been a breath of fresh air and has made sound decisions.
he has even had meetings with South Korea's "supreme Leader" always preferring dialogue over confrontation that could lead to way and he has been more than willing to hold others accountable.
He hasn't put a foot wrong. Trump is fast becomming the benchmark.
At least acknowledge the difference between north and south. I can only acknowledge the difference between New York, LA and Chicago to the real America on the rust-belts.
That's the thing here isn't it. Everyone has abandoned the battler and the working class and also saying they are STUPID!
I don’t think the forum is that polarised.
There is a strong base for Trump from disenfranchised voters. The economy is doing well right now and he could very well retain power. That is once again very flippant.
You said that his supporter base is disenfranchised. Might as well call them silly stupid people like all the other times.
Trump was voted for because he was an alternative to the establishment and the people needed a champion that would represent them rather than just give them jingoistic promises.
Yes the economy is doing well because Trump policies are actually not that bad. He has done a lot.
That’s what I mean by disenfranchised.
OK so you understand then what is going on here, that the masses who voted against the ALP or the Democrats in the USA are the very battlers and working class majorities tryig to put bread on the table.
The people who feel betrayed by what is now the looney left and jingoistic feel good, virtue signalers.
Why do you still consider the Trumps as being bad when they are the only ones listening to the battlers?
I don’t think Trump is the only one listening to the battlers. I would say he is abusing his power for personal gain and that’s most obvious with the Ukraine incident. The question is, do enough people care? Maybe, maybe not. What the hell is the son of someone running for President doing in Ukraine anyway? Its a former Soviet nation who was in conflict with the Russians. We're to believe only he could do that job? Ignorance is a choice so perhaps you could get yourself up to speed here as to why he was there. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hunter_Biden
Irrespective of your politics though in what sort of alternate reality that you live in is it acceptable to ask a foreign power to investigate your opponent? He, by his own admission, openly asked a foreign power to interfere in the domestic politics of the US.
If Anthony Albanese or Bill Shorten did that then they should go to jail no questions asked. If Hillary did that they'd be calling for a lynching in the streets.
LOL
It was a terrible decision for Bidens son to be there. Don't believe me, believe the horses mouth:
https://time.com/5700615/hunter-biden-joe-poor-judgment/
Oh and we move on the impeachment:
Here's a running tally of the witnesses presented so far.
1. Taylor ( The Dems Star Witness) and Kent:
"The problem with Taylor and Kent's testimony is that Trump remained a peripheral and largely mysterious figure throughout" https://www.theage.com.au/world/north-america/impeachment-hearings-damning-for-trump-but-lacks-fireworks-democrats-need-20191114-p53ah7.html
2. Marie Yovanovitch
"Her testimony alone would not be sufficient grounds for impeachment"
https://www.smh.com.au/world/north-america/trump-s-tweeting-turns-a-bad-day-into-a-disaster-20191116-p53b6b.html
One Nothing Burger for the Dems, coming right up!
Whether Biden should have been there is moot. Trump asked a foreign government to investigate his opponent. In times gone by decent members of his own party would have forced him to resign.
Because you ignored my question I'll ask you again.....
Irrespective of your politics though in what sort of alternate reality that you live in is it acceptable to ask a foreign power to investigate your opponent? He, by his own admission, openly asked a foreign power to interfere in the domestic politics of the US.
[/quote]Let me get this straight! You are accusing Trump of asking a foreign power to investigate his opponent now? Desperate to say the least. Even if true, who cares? [/quote]lol this thread has hit it's peak. -PB [/quote] That started when you all started talking about Trump's impeachment. nearly 4 years ago! lol Neeeext!
|
|
|
mouflonrouge
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 2.8K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+x+x+x+x[quote]I'm sure those tax cuts that overwhelmingly went to the rich and allowed companies to buyback their own stocks really helped the little guys. If you honestly believe that Trump is some Gracchi-type tribune of the plebs then you're a fucking gullible moron that fell for his faux-populist rhetoric. Policy outcomes don't really matter at all, it's all about aesthetics and appearing as though you care about the little guy. Why re you resorting to insults? I Do you have ANY idea of what the policy outcomes have been under Trump for the plebs Or is it that you hate Trump and follow what Hollywood, New York and Washington Media tell you and that's as far as you go?FYI: - 6 million jobs added - 500,000 manufacturing jobs added - lowest unemployment in 51 years - 7.6 million job vacancies ie more jobs than people to fill them - Blacks and Hispanics leading the job growth figures, with female Hispanics leading the way - The percentage of Americans living with income below the official poverty line went down to 11.8% of the population in 2018, the lowest level since 2001. - weekly earnings up 2.3 in rel terms - economic growth rate up 2% - food stamp recipients down 15% - 90% more Mexican border apprehensions (there's your Wall) - Home prices up 22% - Home ownership up - Stocks up 30 % - corporate profits up 7% - handgun production down 23% Any fool can spend their way out of trouble. Borrow trillions, give tax cuts left, right and centre and then fuck off into the sunset and let the next bloke worry about it. https://www.washingtonpost.com/business/2019/10/25/us-deficit-hit-billion-marking-nearly-percent-increase-during-trump-era/If you think that's a left wing rag then how about Fox. https://www.foxnews.com/us/us-trade-gap-jumped-to-10-year-high-record-gap-with-chinaor this https://www.foxnews.com/politics/deficits-exploding-and-neither-party-seems-to-careor this https://www.foxnews.com/politics/govt-agency-predicts-trillion-dollar-deficits-for-the-foreseeable-futurethere's dozens of others if you'd care to educate yourself. Tax cuts, spending, and government borrowing money at record low interest is good for the economy More jobs, pay rises, home ownership, more economic opportunity for marginalized groups.less poverty, less crime See previous post on how that looks right now in the US.. If Labour spent like that you'd have a conniption but because Trump....reasons... Have I got that right? How many times have you banged on about Labour spending all of the government's surpluses and wasting the money saved and kicking the can down the road etc etc only for others to have to pick up the bill but for some bizarro reason it's OK for Trump to do it. 1.What is a surplus-its the government taxing more than they needed to run the country. I hate giving a cent more of my money to government than I am required to do, so a surplus?. F that. 2. There is good debt and bad debt. You borrow to buy a house=good debt. To start a business=good debt but more risk. Labor doesn't understand teh difference between good and bad debt. To them, its Someone Else's Money, so who cares? Are You seriously equalling house hold debt to governemnt debt? Its not the same . All governments are in debt. Surpluses are a furphy and are used to pork barrel. We need governments to spend not horde it. Because economics isn't your forte, think of it as your household budget. Can you keep spending more than you earn? You can for a while. And you can keep doing it in proportion to wage or income increases. If you buy a rental property, then that is good debt because your income increases along with your debt. But if you just keep borrowing for things that do not create income and your wage increases don't keep pace, then eventually you will not be able to service your loans and you will have to declare bankruptcy. You will lose everything including the roof over your head. So in order for the State to spend, it has to tax someone. Tax really isn't a problem. It's a necessity. It becomes a problem when Tax is too much and becomes a dissinsentive to investment and business. When it becomes a dissinsentive to business and corporations and also to productivity and workers, they start to cut back and what happens there is they reduce investing, reduce spending and reduce employment. Therefore tax receipts for the State decline further, thus compounding the problems and the deficit. That is why we can only sustainably spend and sustainably borrow. Otherwise what we are doing is actually robbing future generations and our own children. this is the reason why ScoMo won the elections. It's because the vast majority know how the household budget works. The vast majority are trying to balance their own budgets and its proving to be harder and harder.
|
|
|
Carlito
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 28K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x[quote]I'm sure those tax cuts that overwhelmingly went to the rich and allowed companies to buyback their own stocks really helped the little guys. If you honestly believe that Trump is some Gracchi-type tribune of the plebs then you're a fucking gullible moron that fell for his faux-populist rhetoric. Policy outcomes don't really matter at all, it's all about aesthetics and appearing as though you care about the little guy. Why re you resorting to insults? I Do you have ANY idea of what the policy outcomes have been under Trump for the plebs Or is it that you hate Trump and follow what Hollywood, New York and Washington Media tell you and that's as far as you go?FYI: - 6 million jobs added - 500,000 manufacturing jobs added - lowest unemployment in 51 years - 7.6 million job vacancies ie more jobs than people to fill them - Blacks and Hispanics leading the job growth figures, with female Hispanics leading the way - The percentage of Americans living with income below the official poverty line went down to 11.8% of the population in 2018, the lowest level since 2001. - weekly earnings up 2.3 in rel terms - economic growth rate up 2% - food stamp recipients down 15% - 90% more Mexican border apprehensions (there's your Wall) - Home prices up 22% - Home ownership up - Stocks up 30 % - corporate profits up 7% - handgun production down 23% Any fool can spend their way out of trouble. Borrow trillions, give tax cuts left, right and centre and then fuck off into the sunset and let the next bloke worry about it. https://www.washingtonpost.com/business/2019/10/25/us-deficit-hit-billion-marking-nearly-percent-increase-during-trump-era/If you think that's a left wing rag then how about Fox. https://www.foxnews.com/us/us-trade-gap-jumped-to-10-year-high-record-gap-with-chinaor this https://www.foxnews.com/politics/deficits-exploding-and-neither-party-seems-to-careor this https://www.foxnews.com/politics/govt-agency-predicts-trillion-dollar-deficits-for-the-foreseeable-futurethere's dozens of others if you'd care to educate yourself. Tax cuts, spending, and government borrowing money at record low interest is good for the economy More jobs, pay rises, home ownership, more economic opportunity for marginalized groups.less poverty, less crime See previous post on how that looks right now in the US.. If Labour spent like that you'd have a conniption but because Trump....reasons... Have I got that right? How many times have you banged on about Labour spending all of the government's surpluses and wasting the money saved and kicking the can down the road etc etc only for others to have to pick up the bill but for some bizarro reason it's OK for Trump to do it. 1.What is a surplus-its the government taxing more than they needed to run the country. I hate giving a cent more of my money to government than I am required to do, so a surplus?. F that. 2. There is good debt and bad debt. You borrow to buy a house=good debt. To start a business=good debt but more risk. Labor doesn't understand teh difference between good and bad debt. To them, its Someone Else's Money, so who cares? Are You seriously equalling house hold debt to governemnt debt? Its not the same . All governments are in debt. Surpluses are a furphy and are used to pork barrel. We need governments to spend not horde it. Because economics isn't your forte, think of it as your household budget. Can you keep spending more than you earn? You can for a while. And you can keep doing it in proportion to wage or income increases. If you buy a rental property, then that is good debt because your income increases along with your debt. But if you just keep borrowing for things that do not create income and your wage increases don't keep pace, then eventually you will not be able to service your loans and you will have to declare bankruptcy. You will lose everything including the roof over your head. So in order for the State to spend, it has to tax someone. Tax really isn't a problem. It's a necessity. It becomes a problem when Tax is too much and becomes a dissinsentive to investment and business. When it becomes a dissinsentive to business and corporations and also to productivity and workers, they start to cut back and what happens there is they reduce investing, reduce spending and reduce employment. Therefore tax receipts for the State decline further, thus compounding the problems and the deficit. That is why we can only sustainably spend and sustainably borrow. Otherwise what we are doing is actually robbing future generations and our own children. this is the reason why ScoMo won the elections. It's because the vast majority know how the household budget works. The vast majority are trying to balance their own budgets and its proving to be harder and harder. Again houseold debt is nowhere the same as government debt you imbecile. Sustainbly borrow ? You mean give out grants to companies that go bankrupt ? Or dont need Grants in the first place.
|
|
|
mouflonrouge
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 2.8K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x[quote]I'm sure those tax cuts that overwhelmingly went to the rich and allowed companies to buyback their own stocks really helped the little guys. If you honestly believe that Trump is some Gracchi-type tribune of the plebs then you're a fucking gullible moron that fell for his faux-populist rhetoric. Policy outcomes don't really matter at all, it's all about aesthetics and appearing as though you care about the little guy. Why re you resorting to insults? I Do you have ANY idea of what the policy outcomes have been under Trump for the plebs Or is it that you hate Trump and follow what Hollywood, New York and Washington Media tell you and that's as far as you go?FYI: - 6 million jobs added - 500,000 manufacturing jobs added - lowest unemployment in 51 years - 7.6 million job vacancies ie more jobs than people to fill them - Blacks and Hispanics leading the job growth figures, with female Hispanics leading the way - The percentage of Americans living with income below the official poverty line went down to 11.8% of the population in 2018, the lowest level since 2001. - weekly earnings up 2.3 in rel terms - economic growth rate up 2% - food stamp recipients down 15% - 90% more Mexican border apprehensions (there's your Wall) - Home prices up 22% - Home ownership up - Stocks up 30 % - corporate profits up 7% - handgun production down 23% Any fool can spend their way out of trouble. Borrow trillions, give tax cuts left, right and centre and then fuck off into the sunset and let the next bloke worry about it. https://www.washingtonpost.com/business/2019/10/25/us-deficit-hit-billion-marking-nearly-percent-increase-during-trump-era/If you think that's a left wing rag then how about Fox. https://www.foxnews.com/us/us-trade-gap-jumped-to-10-year-high-record-gap-with-chinaor this https://www.foxnews.com/politics/deficits-exploding-and-neither-party-seems-to-careor this https://www.foxnews.com/politics/govt-agency-predicts-trillion-dollar-deficits-for-the-foreseeable-futurethere's dozens of others if you'd care to educate yourself. Tax cuts, spending, and government borrowing money at record low interest is good for the economy More jobs, pay rises, home ownership, more economic opportunity for marginalized groups.less poverty, less crime See previous post on how that looks right now in the US.. If Labour spent like that you'd have a conniption but because Trump....reasons... Have I got that right? How many times have you banged on about Labour spending all of the government's surpluses and wasting the money saved and kicking the can down the road etc etc only for others to have to pick up the bill but for some bizarro reason it's OK for Trump to do it. 1.What is a surplus-its the government taxing more than they needed to run the country. I hate giving a cent more of my money to government than I am required to do, so a surplus?. F that. 2. There is good debt and bad debt. You borrow to buy a house=good debt. To start a business=good debt but more risk. Labor doesn't understand teh difference between good and bad debt. To them, its Someone Else's Money, so who cares? Are You seriously equalling house hold debt to governemnt debt? Its not the same . All governments are in debt. Surpluses are a furphy and are used to pork barrel. We need governments to spend not horde it. Because economics isn't your forte, think of it as your household budget. Can you keep spending more than you earn? You can for a while. And you can keep doing it in proportion to wage or income increases. If you buy a rental property, then that is good debt because your income increases along with your debt. But if you just keep borrowing for things that do not create income and your wage increases don't keep pace, then eventually you will not be able to service your loans and you will have to declare bankruptcy. You will lose everything including the roof over your head. So in order for the State to spend, it has to tax someone. Tax really isn't a problem. It's a necessity. It becomes a problem when Tax is too much and becomes a dissinsentive to investment and business. When it becomes a dissinsentive to business and corporations and also to productivity and workers, they start to cut back and what happens there is they reduce investing, reduce spending and reduce employment. Therefore tax receipts for the State decline further, thus compounding the problems and the deficit. That is why we can only sustainably spend and sustainably borrow. Otherwise what we are doing is actually robbing future generations and our own children. this is the reason why ScoMo won the elections. It's because the vast majority know how the household budget works. The vast majority are trying to balance their own budgets and its proving to be harder and harder. Again houseold debt is nowhere the same as government debt you imbecile. Sustainbly borrow ? You mean give out grants to companies that go bankrupt ? Or dont need Grants in the first place. What grants and to which companies? Please provide examples. I have not heard of Government providing grants to business. And secondly, Government Debt is debt. It needs to be paid back and yes my examples are perfectly valid. A State can't just keep increasing its debt. In case that gasn't sunk into your thick head, then I suggest you research the Global Financial Crisis and what happened to Greece, Italy, Spain, Portugal, Ireland and Cyprus.
|
|
|
433
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 6.7K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x[quote]I'm sure those tax cuts that overwhelmingly went to the rich and allowed companies to buyback their own stocks really helped the little guys. If you honestly believe that Trump is some Gracchi-type tribune of the plebs then you're a fucking gullible moron that fell for his faux-populist rhetoric. Policy outcomes don't really matter at all, it's all about aesthetics and appearing as though you care about the little guy. Why re you resorting to insults? I Do you have ANY idea of what the policy outcomes have been under Trump for the plebs Or is it that you hate Trump and follow what Hollywood, New York and Washington Media tell you and that's as far as you go?FYI: - 6 million jobs added - 500,000 manufacturing jobs added - lowest unemployment in 51 years - 7.6 million job vacancies ie more jobs than people to fill them - Blacks and Hispanics leading the job growth figures, with female Hispanics leading the way - The percentage of Americans living with income below the official poverty line went down to 11.8% of the population in 2018, the lowest level since 2001. - weekly earnings up 2.3 in rel terms - economic growth rate up 2% - food stamp recipients down 15% - 90% more Mexican border apprehensions (there's your Wall) - Home prices up 22% - Home ownership up - Stocks up 30 % - corporate profits up 7% - handgun production down 23% Any fool can spend their way out of trouble. Borrow trillions, give tax cuts left, right and centre and then fuck off into the sunset and let the next bloke worry about it. https://www.washingtonpost.com/business/2019/10/25/us-deficit-hit-billion-marking-nearly-percent-increase-during-trump-era/If you think that's a left wing rag then how about Fox. https://www.foxnews.com/us/us-trade-gap-jumped-to-10-year-high-record-gap-with-chinaor this https://www.foxnews.com/politics/deficits-exploding-and-neither-party-seems-to-careor this https://www.foxnews.com/politics/govt-agency-predicts-trillion-dollar-deficits-for-the-foreseeable-futurethere's dozens of others if you'd care to educate yourself. Tax cuts, spending, and government borrowing money at record low interest is good for the economy More jobs, pay rises, home ownership, more economic opportunity for marginalized groups.less poverty, less crime See previous post on how that looks right now in the US.. If Labour spent like that you'd have a conniption but because Trump....reasons... Have I got that right? How many times have you banged on about Labour spending all of the government's surpluses and wasting the money saved and kicking the can down the road etc etc only for others to have to pick up the bill but for some bizarro reason it's OK for Trump to do it. 1.What is a surplus-its the government taxing more than they needed to run the country. I hate giving a cent more of my money to government than I am required to do, so a surplus?. F that. 2. There is good debt and bad debt. You borrow to buy a house=good debt. To start a business=good debt but more risk. Labor doesn't understand teh difference between good and bad debt. To them, its Someone Else's Money, so who cares? Are You seriously equalling house hold debt to governemnt debt? Its not the same . All governments are in debt. Surpluses are a furphy and are used to pork barrel. We need governments to spend not horde it. Because economics isn't your forte, think of it as your household budget. bruh
|
|
|
Burztur
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 9.1K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+xI'm sure those tax cuts that overwhelmingly went to the rich and allowed companies to buyback their own stocks really helped the little guys. If you honestly believe that Trump is some Gracchi-type tribune of the plebs then you're a fucking gullible moron that fell for his faux-populist rhetoric. Policy outcomes don't really matter at all, it's all about aesthetics and appearing as though you care about the little guy. Why re you resorting to insults? I Do you have ANY idea of what the policy outcomes have been under Trump for the plebs Or is it that you hate Trump and follow what Hollywood, New York and Washington Media tell you and that's as far as you go?FYI: - 6 million jobs added - 500,000 manufacturing jobs added - lowest unemployment in 51 years - 7.6 million job vacancies ie more jobs than people to fill them - Blacks and Hispanics leading the job growth figures, with female Hispanics leading the way - The percentage of Americans living with income below the official poverty line went down to 11.8% of the population in 2018, the lowest level since 2001. - weekly earnings up 2.3 in rel terms - economic growth rate up 2% - food stamp recipients down 15% - 90% more Mexican border apprehensions (there's your Wall) - Home prices up 22% - Home ownership up - Stocks up 30 % - corporate profits up 7% - handgun production down 23% Tax reform in the US was a 30 year in the making project. It was not a function of Trump though. It was a function of Republicans controlling the White House, Senate and Congress. If either were not Republican controlled (like Congress now), it wouldn’t have happened. Hence the rush to push it through. The US have a very outdated tax system which the reforms fixed. It lowered the headline rate from 35% to 21% but also got rid of the deferred tax regime for foreign earnings meaning they now tax foreign earnings like everyone else. The reform also makes hiring in the US more competitive again so this would help with the jobs growth. You’re not going to be better than low cost jurisdictions but you’re tipping the scale back slightly.
|
|
|
Enzo Bearzot
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 4.5K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+xI'm sure those tax cuts that overwhelmingly went to the rich and allowed companies to buyback their own stocks really helped the little guys. If you honestly believe that Trump is some Gracchi-type tribune of the plebs then you're a fucking gullible moron that fell for his faux-populist rhetoric. Policy outcomes don't really matter at all, it's all about aesthetics and appearing as though you care about the little guy. Why re you resorting to insults? I Do you have ANY idea of what the policy outcomes have been under Trump for the plebs Or is it that you hate Trump and follow what Hollywood, New York and Washington Media tell you and that's as far as you go?FYI: - 6 million jobs added - 500,000 manufacturing jobs added - lowest unemployment in 51 years - 7.6 million job vacancies ie more jobs than people to fill them - Blacks and Hispanics leading the job growth figures, with female Hispanics leading the way - The percentage of Americans living with income below the official poverty line went down to 11.8% of the population in 2018, the lowest level since 2001. - weekly earnings up 2.3 in rel terms - economic growth rate up 2% - food stamp recipients down 15% - 90% more Mexican border apprehensions (there's your Wall) - Home prices up 22% - Home ownership up - Stocks up 30 % - corporate profits up 7% - handgun production down 23% Tax reform in the US was a 30 year in the making project. It was not a function of Trump though. It was a function of Republicans controlling the White House, Senate and Congress. If either were not Republican controlled (like Congress now), it wouldn’t have happened. Hence the rush to push it through. The US have a very outdated tax system which the reforms fixed. It lowered the headline rate from 35% to 21% but also got rid of the deferred tax regime for foreign earnings meaning they now tax foreign earnings like everyone else. The reform also makes hiring in the US more competitive again so this would help with the jobs growth. You’re not going to be better than low cost jurisdictions but you’re tipping the scale back slightly. If the US economy tanks under Trump you'll be blaming it all 100% on Trump. But when it booms you want the Democrats to take credit for it.? Yeah, nah. The share markets went through the roof more or less immediately after he got in. Tarriffs don't work, right? Wrong. The Chines product now costs more so the US consumer might buy a competing product which is better value. This hurts the Chinese. If they buy the Chinese product anyway, the tax goes to the government and the money stays within the US to be spent on the US people. Either way the Chinese need to come to the party rather than undercutting the world with cheap labor and at the same time opening ther markets to the world Trump has more than enough positives he could claim his own in the election campaign, if he could only stop of engaging with the moronic far left Democrats. One serious question. were you-and by you I mean all the other Trump haters-before I posted them actually aware of any of the economic performance under Trump figures above? Or will you just hate Trump and will do so no matter what?
|
|
|
Enzo Bearzot
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 4.5K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+x+x+x+x[quote]I'm sure those tax cuts that overwhelmingly went to the rich and allowed companies to buyback their own stocks really helped the little guys. If you honestly believe that Trump is some Gracchi-type tribune of the plebs then you're a fucking gullible moron that fell for his faux-populist rhetoric. Policy outcomes don't really matter at all, it's all about aesthetics and appearing as though you care about the little guy. Why re you resorting to insults? I Do you have ANY idea of what the policy outcomes have been under Trump for the plebs Or is it that you hate Trump and follow what Hollywood, New York and Washington Media tell you and that's as far as you go?FYI: - 6 million jobs added - 500,000 manufacturing jobs added - lowest unemployment in 51 years - 7.6 million job vacancies ie more jobs than people to fill them - Blacks and Hispanics leading the job growth figures, with female Hispanics leading the way - The percentage of Americans living with income below the official poverty line went down to 11.8% of the population in 2018, the lowest level since 2001. - weekly earnings up 2.3 in rel terms - economic growth rate up 2% - food stamp recipients down 15% - 90% more Mexican border apprehensions (there's your Wall) - Home prices up 22% - Home ownership up - Stocks up 30 % - corporate profits up 7% - handgun production down 23% Any fool can spend their way out of trouble. Borrow trillions, give tax cuts left, right and centre and then fuck off into the sunset and let the next bloke worry about it. https://www.washingtonpost.com/business/2019/10/25/us-deficit-hit-billion-marking-nearly-percent-increase-during-trump-era/If you think that's a left wing rag then how about Fox. https://www.foxnews.com/us/us-trade-gap-jumped-to-10-year-high-record-gap-with-chinaor this https://www.foxnews.com/politics/deficits-exploding-and-neither-party-seems-to-careor this https://www.foxnews.com/politics/govt-agency-predicts-trillion-dollar-deficits-for-the-foreseeable-futurethere's dozens of others if you'd care to educate yourself. Tax cuts, spending, and government borrowing money at record low interest is good for the economy More jobs, pay rises, home ownership, more economic opportunity for marginalized groups.less poverty, less crime See previous post on how that looks right now in the US.. If Labour spent like that you'd have a conniption but because Trump....reasons... Have I got that right? How many times have you banged on about Labour spending all of the government's surpluses and wasting the money saved and kicking the can down the road etc etc only for others to have to pick up the bill but for some bizarro reason it's OK for Trump to do it. 1.What is a surplus-its the government taxing more than they needed to run the country. I hate giving a cent more of my money to government than I am required to do, so a surplus?. F that. 2. There is good debt and bad debt. You borrow to buy a house=good debt. To start a business=good debt but more risk. Labor doesn't understand teh difference between good and bad debt. To them, its Someone Else's Money, so who cares? Are You seriously equalling house hold debt to governemnt debt? Its not the same . All governments are in debt. Surpluses are a furphy and are used to pork barrel. We need governments to spend not horde it. Oh the Magic Money Theory (MMT). Government debt doesn't matter because the government can just "print" more money, and spend as much of it as it wants. One wonders why every African despot doesn't just get himself a laptop with and Excell spreadsheet and just keeping adding zero's to the national currency reserves. Look up Hyerinflation in the Weimar republic to see where that leads. Government debt matters because if you don't pay your debts, others will refuse to trade with you in your currency. See Greece. At the other end, government debt is only a problem if you can't manage it ie you can't make the repayments and the borrowing costs are too highl. But right now interest rates are low so its not a problem. If they go up who knows?
|
|
|
Enzo Bearzot
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 4.5K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x[quote]I'm sure those tax cuts that overwhelmingly went to the rich and allowed companies to buyback their own stocks really helped the little guys. If you honestly believe that Trump is some Gracchi-type tribune of the plebs then you're a fucking gullible moron that fell for his faux-populist rhetoric. Policy outcomes don't really matter at all, it's all about aesthetics and appearing as though you care about the little guy. Why re you resorting to insults? I Do you have ANY idea of what the policy outcomes have been under Trump for the plebs Or is it that you hate Trump and follow what Hollywood, New York and Washington Media tell you and that's as far as you go?FYI: - 6 million jobs added - 500,000 manufacturing jobs added - lowest unemployment in 51 years - 7.6 million job vacancies ie more jobs than people to fill them - Blacks and Hispanics leading the job growth figures, with female Hispanics leading the way - The percentage of Americans living with income below the official poverty line went down to 11.8% of the population in 2018, the lowest level since 2001. - weekly earnings up 2.3 in rel terms - economic growth rate up 2% - food stamp recipients down 15% - 90% more Mexican border apprehensions (there's your Wall) - Home prices up 22% - Home ownership up - Stocks up 30 % - corporate profits up 7% - handgun production down 23% Any fool can spend their way out of trouble. Borrow trillions, give tax cuts left, right and centre and then fuck off into the sunset and let the next bloke worry about it. https://www.washingtonpost.com/business/2019/10/25/us-deficit-hit-billion-marking-nearly-percent-increase-during-trump-era/If you think that's a left wing rag then how about Fox. https://www.foxnews.com/us/us-trade-gap-jumped-to-10-year-high-record-gap-with-chinaor this https://www.foxnews.com/politics/deficits-exploding-and-neither-party-seems-to-careor this https://www.foxnews.com/politics/govt-agency-predicts-trillion-dollar-deficits-for-the-foreseeable-futurethere's dozens of others if you'd care to educate yourself. Tax cuts, spending, and government borrowing money at record low interest is good for the economy More jobs, pay rises, home ownership, more economic opportunity for marginalized groups.less poverty, less crime See previous post on how that looks right now in the US.. If Labour spent like that you'd have a conniption but because Trump....reasons... Have I got that right? How many times have you banged on about Labour spending all of the government's surpluses and wasting the money saved and kicking the can down the road etc etc only for others to have to pick up the bill but for some bizarro reason it's OK for Trump to do it. 1.What is a surplus-its the government taxing more than they needed to run the country. I hate giving a cent more of my money to government than I am required to do, so a surplus?. F that. 2. There is good debt and bad debt. You borrow to buy a house=good debt. To start a business=good debt but more risk. Labor doesn't understand teh difference between good and bad debt. To them, its Someone Else's Money, so who cares? Are You seriously equalling house hold debt to governemnt debt? Its not the same . All governments are in debt. Surpluses are a furphy and are used to pork barrel. We need governments to spend not horde it. Because economics isn't your forte, think of it as your household budget. Can you keep spending more than you earn? You can for a while. And you can keep doing it in proportion to wage or income increases. If you buy a rental property, then that is good debt because your income increases along with your debt. But if you just keep borrowing for things that do not create income and your wage increases don't keep pace, then eventually you will not be able to service your loans and you will have to declare bankruptcy. You will lose everything including the roof over your head. So in order for the State to spend, it has to tax someone. Tax really isn't a problem. It's a necessity. It becomes a problem when Tax is too much and becomes a dissinsentive to investment and business. When it becomes a dissinsentive to business and corporations and also to productivity and workers, they start to cut back and what happens there is they reduce investing, reduce spending and reduce employment. Therefore tax receipts for the State decline further, thus compounding the problems and the deficit. That is why we can only sustainably spend and sustainably borrow. Otherwise what we are doing is actually robbing future generations and our own children. this is the reason why ScoMo won the elections. It's because the vast majority know how the household budget works. The vast majority are trying to balance their own budgets and its proving to be harder and harder. Again houseold debt is nowhere the same as government debt you imbecile. Sustainbly borrow ? You mean give out grants to companies that go bankrupt ? Or dont need Grants in the first place. Stop swallowing the Socialist Cool Aid . Someone always has to pay, one way or the other. Again See Greece. But I don't expect Socialists to understand the concept of Paying For It, because its always Someone Else's Money they spend, so it doesn't matter to them. Until it does.
|
|
|
Carlito
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 28K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x[quote]I'm sure those tax cuts that overwhelmingly went to the rich and allowed companies to buyback their own stocks really helped the little guys. If you honestly believe that Trump is some Gracchi-type tribune of the plebs then you're a fucking gullible moron that fell for his faux-populist rhetoric. Policy outcomes don't really matter at all, it's all about aesthetics and appearing as though you care about the little guy. Why re you resorting to insults? I Do you have ANY idea of what the policy outcomes have been under Trump for the plebs Or is it that you hate Trump and follow what Hollywood, New York and Washington Media tell you and that's as far as you go?FYI: - 6 million jobs added - 500,000 manufacturing jobs added - lowest unemployment in 51 years - 7.6 million job vacancies ie more jobs than people to fill them - Blacks and Hispanics leading the job growth figures, with female Hispanics leading the way - The percentage of Americans living with income below the official poverty line went down to 11.8% of the population in 2018, the lowest level since 2001. - weekly earnings up 2.3 in rel terms - economic growth rate up 2% - food stamp recipients down 15% - 90% more Mexican border apprehensions (there's your Wall) - Home prices up 22% - Home ownership up - Stocks up 30 % - corporate profits up 7% - handgun production down 23% Any fool can spend their way out of trouble. Borrow trillions, give tax cuts left, right and centre and then fuck off into the sunset and let the next bloke worry about it. https://www.washingtonpost.com/business/2019/10/25/us-deficit-hit-billion-marking-nearly-percent-increase-during-trump-era/If you think that's a left wing rag then how about Fox. https://www.foxnews.com/us/us-trade-gap-jumped-to-10-year-high-record-gap-with-chinaor this https://www.foxnews.com/politics/deficits-exploding-and-neither-party-seems-to-careor this https://www.foxnews.com/politics/govt-agency-predicts-trillion-dollar-deficits-for-the-foreseeable-futurethere's dozens of others if you'd care to educate yourself. Tax cuts, spending, and government borrowing money at record low interest is good for the economy More jobs, pay rises, home ownership, more economic opportunity for marginalized groups.less poverty, less crime See previous post on how that looks right now in the US.. If Labour spent like that you'd have a conniption but because Trump....reasons... Have I got that right? How many times have you banged on about Labour spending all of the government's surpluses and wasting the money saved and kicking the can down the road etc etc only for others to have to pick up the bill but for some bizarro reason it's OK for Trump to do it. 1.What is a surplus-its the government taxing more than they needed to run the country. I hate giving a cent more of my money to government than I am required to do, so a surplus?. F that. 2. There is good debt and bad debt. You borrow to buy a house=good debt. To start a business=good debt but more risk. Labor doesn't understand teh difference between good and bad debt. To them, its Someone Else's Money, so who cares? Are You seriously equalling house hold debt to governemnt debt? Its not the same . All governments are in debt. Surpluses are a furphy and are used to pork barrel. We need governments to spend not horde it. Because economics isn't your forte, think of it as your household budget. Can you keep spending more than you earn? You can for a while. And you can keep doing it in proportion to wage or income increases. If you buy a rental property, then that is good debt because your income increases along with your debt. But if you just keep borrowing for things that do not create income and your wage increases don't keep pace, then eventually you will not be able to service your loans and you will have to declare bankruptcy. You will lose everything including the roof over your head. So in order for the State to spend, it has to tax someone. Tax really isn't a problem. It's a necessity. It becomes a problem when Tax is too much and becomes a dissinsentive to investment and business. When it becomes a dissinsentive to business and corporations and also to productivity and workers, they start to cut back and what happens there is they reduce investing, reduce spending and reduce employment. Therefore tax receipts for the State decline further, thus compounding the problems and the deficit. That is why we can only sustainably spend and sustainably borrow. Otherwise what we are doing is actually robbing future generations and our own children. this is the reason why ScoMo won the elections. It's because the vast majority know how the household budget works. The vast majority are trying to balance their own budgets and its proving to be harder and harder. Again houseold debt is nowhere the same as government debt you imbecile. Sustainbly borrow ? You mean give out grants to companies that go bankrupt ? Or dont need Grants in the first place. Stop swallowing the Socialist Cool Aid . Someone always has to pay, one way or the other. Again See Greece. But I don't expect Socialists to understand the concept of Paying For It, because its always Someone Else's Money they spend, so it doesn't matter to them. Until it does. Lol you have no clue about government debt do you? Also we are not greece. Unless you want the lnp to borrow over What They can pay back. Even America is in debt. Spending it on infrastructue , health ,education et el is needed and not hording it to pork barrel people like you who only see oh money
|
|
|
mouflonrouge
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 2.8K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x[quote]I'm sure those tax cuts that overwhelmingly went to the rich and allowed companies to buyback their own stocks really helped the little guys. If you honestly believe that Trump is some Gracchi-type tribune of the plebs then you're a fucking gullible moron that fell for his faux-populist rhetoric. Policy outcomes don't really matter at all, it's all about aesthetics and appearing as though you care about the little guy. Why re you resorting to insults? I Do you have ANY idea of what the policy outcomes have been under Trump for the plebs Or is it that you hate Trump and follow what Hollywood, New York and Washington Media tell you and that's as far as you go?FYI: - 6 million jobs added - 500,000 manufacturing jobs added - lowest unemployment in 51 years - 7.6 million job vacancies ie more jobs than people to fill them - Blacks and Hispanics leading the job growth figures, with female Hispanics leading the way - The percentage of Americans living with income below the official poverty line went down to 11.8% of the population in 2018, the lowest level since 2001. - weekly earnings up 2.3 in rel terms - economic growth rate up 2% - food stamp recipients down 15% - 90% more Mexican border apprehensions (there's your Wall) - Home prices up 22% - Home ownership up - Stocks up 30 % - corporate profits up 7% - handgun production down 23% Any fool can spend their way out of trouble. Borrow trillions, give tax cuts left, right and centre and then fuck off into the sunset and let the next bloke worry about it. https://www.washingtonpost.com/business/2019/10/25/us-deficit-hit-billion-marking-nearly-percent-increase-during-trump-era/If you think that's a left wing rag then how about Fox. https://www.foxnews.com/us/us-trade-gap-jumped-to-10-year-high-record-gap-with-chinaor this https://www.foxnews.com/politics/deficits-exploding-and-neither-party-seems-to-careor this https://www.foxnews.com/politics/govt-agency-predicts-trillion-dollar-deficits-for-the-foreseeable-futurethere's dozens of others if you'd care to educate yourself. Tax cuts, spending, and government borrowing money at record low interest is good for the economy More jobs, pay rises, home ownership, more economic opportunity for marginalized groups.less poverty, less crime See previous post on how that looks right now in the US.. If Labour spent like that you'd have a conniption but because Trump....reasons... Have I got that right? How many times have you banged on about Labour spending all of the government's surpluses and wasting the money saved and kicking the can down the road etc etc only for others to have to pick up the bill but for some bizarro reason it's OK for Trump to do it. 1.What is a surplus-its the government taxing more than they needed to run the country. I hate giving a cent more of my money to government than I am required to do, so a surplus?. F that. 2. There is good debt and bad debt. You borrow to buy a house=good debt. To start a business=good debt but more risk. Labor doesn't understand teh difference between good and bad debt. To them, its Someone Else's Money, so who cares? Are You seriously equalling house hold debt to governemnt debt? Its not the same . All governments are in debt. Surpluses are a furphy and are used to pork barrel. We need governments to spend not horde it. Because economics isn't your forte, think of it as your household budget. Can you keep spending more than you earn? You can for a while. And you can keep doing it in proportion to wage or income increases. If you buy a rental property, then that is good debt because your income increases along with your debt. But if you just keep borrowing for things that do not create income and your wage increases don't keep pace, then eventually you will not be able to service your loans and you will have to declare bankruptcy. You will lose everything including the roof over your head. So in order for the State to spend, it has to tax someone. Tax really isn't a problem. It's a necessity. It becomes a problem when Tax is too much and becomes a dissinsentive to investment and business. When it becomes a dissinsentive to business and corporations and also to productivity and workers, they start to cut back and what happens there is they reduce investing, reduce spending and reduce employment. Therefore tax receipts for the State decline further, thus compounding the problems and the deficit. That is why we can only sustainably spend and sustainably borrow. Otherwise what we are doing is actually robbing future generations and our own children. this is the reason why ScoMo won the elections. It's because the vast majority know how the household budget works. The vast majority are trying to balance their own budgets and its proving to be harder and harder. Again houseold debt is nowhere the same as government debt you imbecile. Sustainbly borrow ? You mean give out grants to companies that go bankrupt ? Or dont need Grants in the first place. Stop swallowing the Socialist Cool Aid . Someone always has to pay, one way or the other. Again See Greece. But I don't expect Socialists to understand the concept of Paying For It, because its always Someone Else's Money they spend, so it doesn't matter to them. Until it does. Lol you have no clue about government debt do you? Also we are not greece. Unless you want the lnp to borrow over What They can pay back. Even America is in debt. Spending it on infrastructue , health ,education et el is needed and not hording it to pork barrel people like you who only see oh money Unbelievable! You actually think Greece and the other Eurozone economies have different rules when it comes to debt. Every country has the potential to be a Greece. This country actually had better socialist programs than Australia did. It was very progressive in that it had a great pension system, free medical, university degrees were free and so on. Now look what has happened. It wasn't the only country of course - Spain, Portugal, Ireland and Cyprus were in the same boat. And Italy is on the verge and hanging on only just. The GFC hit many countries. I just can't believe how delusional you guys are. Please let me once again try and explain things to you in simple terms. You can only borrow for as long as you can service your debt. This applies to all countries. And even if you don't borrow and have a debt and go into recession, then the debt to GDP ratio increases. If you borrow on top of that, it increases further. And as the recession deepens, Government receipts tighten and decrease, thus reducing its ability to service its debt. This reduces the credit rating and increases the interest rate it needs to service, thus compounding things further. If the debts are not serviced, then countries will not accept your trade in your currency because the risk is it will become worthless as inflation increases. Then eventually, you have a meltdown and a banking crisis as property prices free fall, leaving all debts unsecured. Don't ever believe it will not happen in Australia. A credit crunch is inevitable in ALL countries. But the more debt there is, and the bigger the deficit, the worse the calamity. The Great Depression of the 1930s hit the global economy to point of famine. It WILL happen again.
|
|
|
LFC.
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 13K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x[quote]+x[quote]+x[quote]Democrats haven't learnt their lesson from last time if they pick Biden. Not as unlikable as Hilary but not far off. Bernie ftw Bernie is too socialist for Americans. Like here people say they are left leaning but cant or won't vote for someone who is too left I just want to see someone who appears to be a genuine person that cares about the country get a crack. Put in another middle of the road career politician like Biden, like Hilary, and trump will have a field day. The reality is most vote on personality rather than policy. Yup. I think 2/3rds of Trump supporters are rusted on regardless of if the Ukraine scandal is an abuse of power or not.
I wonder whether the remaining 1/3 would change their vote because of it. No chance there!
No one is taking the Ukraine allegations seriously. I keep telling everyone, the be Trump Derangement Syndrome, the more actual support for Trump.
Trump seems to be taking it seriously with the number of tweets and reactions.
Donald Trump is a buffoon however I can't see anything he has done be it Russia or Ukraine that would justify impeachment.
If he is the buffoon, what are his opponents?
I think applying the 'but what about xxxxx' principle doesn't apply here. Democrats are corrupt pieces of shit however Trump acts & behaves like a buffoon, whether he does it to fuck with people or whatever however it can't be denied. I beg to differ.
Trump has behaved like a true Statesman here, always being prepared to make the tough decisions. Right now, the US economy is performing well and Trump has not been the disaster everyone said he would be but rather he has been a breath of fresh air and has made sound decisions.
he has even had meetings with South Korea's "supreme Leader" always preferring dialogue over confrontation that could lead to way and he has been more than willing to hold others accountable.
He hasn't put a foot wrong. Trump is fast becomming the benchmark.
At least acknowledge the difference between north and south. I can only acknowledge the difference between New York, LA and Chicago to the real America on the rust-belts.
That's the thing here isn't it. Everyone has abandoned the battler and the working class and also saying they are STUPID!
I don’t think the forum is that polarised.
There is a strong base for Trump from disenfranchised voters. The economy is doing well right now and he could very well retain power. That is once again very flippant.
You said that his supporter base is disenfranchised. Might as well call them silly stupid people like all the other times.
Trump was voted for because he was an alternative to the establishment and the people needed a champion that would represent them rather than just give them jingoistic promises.
Yes the economy is doing well because Trump policies are actually not that bad. He has done a lot.
That’s what I mean by disenfranchised.
OK so you understand then what is going on here, that the masses who voted against the ALP or the Democrats in the USA are the very battlers and working class majorities tryig to put bread on the table.
The people who feel betrayed by what is now the looney left and jingoistic feel good, virtue signalers.
Why do you still consider the Trumps as being bad when they are the only ones listening to the battlers?
I don’t think Trump is the only one listening to the battlers. I would say he is abusing his power for personal gain and that’s most obvious with the Ukraine incident. The question is, do enough people care? Maybe, maybe not. What the hell is the son of someone running for President doing in Ukraine anyway? Its a former Soviet nation who was in conflict with the Russians. We're to believe only he could do that job? Ignorance is a choice so perhaps you could get yourself up to speed here as to why he was there. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hunter_Biden
Irrespective of your politics though in what sort of alternate reality that you live in is it acceptable to ask a foreign power to investigate your opponent? He, by his own admission, openly asked a foreign power to interfere in the domestic politics of the US.
If Anthony Albanese or Bill Shorten did that then they should go to jail no questions asked. If Hillary did that they'd be calling for a lynching in the streets.
LOL
It was a terrible decision for Bidens son to be there. Don't believe me, believe the horses mouth:
https://time.com/5700615/hunter-biden-joe-poor-judgment/
Oh and we move on the impeachment:
Here's a running tally of the witnesses presented so far.
1. Taylor ( The Dems Star Witness) and Kent:
"The problem with Taylor and Kent's testimony is that Trump remained a peripheral and largely mysterious figure throughout" https://www.theage.com.au/world/north-america/impeachment-hearings-damning-for-trump-but-lacks-fireworks-democrats-need-20191114-p53ah7.html
2. Marie Yovanovitch
"Her testimony alone would not be sufficient grounds for impeachment"
https://www.smh.com.au/world/north-america/trump-s-tweeting-turns-a-bad-day-into-a-disaster-20191116-p53b6b.html
One Nothing Burger for the Dems, coming right up!
Whether Biden should have been there is moot. Trump asked a foreign government to investigate his opponent. In times gone by decent members of his own party would have forced him to resign.
Because you ignored my question I'll ask you again.....
Irrespective of your politics though in what sort of alternate reality that you live in is it acceptable to ask a foreign power to investigate your opponent? He, by his own admission, openly asked a foreign power to interfere in the domestic politics of the US.
[/quote]Let me get this straight! You are accusing Trump of asking a foreign power to investigate his opponent now? Desperate to say the least. Even if true, who cares? [/quote]lol this thread has hit it's peak. -PB [/quote] agreed, by those who only see their side of the politics.....no matter the dislike of Trump as a person and persona he is recovering alot that the Obama's and fellow leaders could/should have done. The maths back him up them the facts but you can't please them all.
Love Football
|
|
|
mouflonrouge
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 2.8K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x[quote]+x[quote]+x[quote]+x[quote]Democrats haven't learnt their lesson from last time if they pick Biden. Not as unlikable as Hilary but not far off. Bernie ftw Bernie is too socialist for Americans. Like here people say they are left leaning but cant or won't vote for someone who is too left I just want to see someone who appears to be a genuine person that cares about the country get a crack. Put in another middle of the road career politician like Biden, like Hilary, and trump will have a field day. The reality is most vote on personality rather than policy. Yup. I think 2/3rds of Trump supporters are rusted on regardless of if the Ukraine scandal is an abuse of power or not. I wonder whether the remaining 1/3 would change their vote because of it. No chance there! No one is taking the Ukraine allegations seriously. I keep telling everyone, the be Trump Derangement Syndrome, the more actual support for Trump. Trump seems to be taking it seriously with the number of tweets and reactions. Donald Trump is a buffoon however I can't see anything he has done be it Russia or Ukraine that would justify impeachment. If he is the buffoon, what are his opponents? I think applying the 'but what about xxxxx' principle doesn't apply here. Democrats are corrupt pieces of shit however Trump acts & behaves like a buffoon, whether he does it to fuck with people or whatever however it can't be denied. I beg to differ. Trump has behaved like a true Statesman here, always being prepared to make the tough decisions. Right now, the US economy is performing well and Trump has not been the disaster everyone said he would be but rather he has been a breath of fresh air and has made sound decisions. he has even had meetings with South Korea's "supreme Leader" always preferring dialogue over confrontation that could lead to way and he has been more than willing to hold others accountable. He hasn't put a foot wrong. Trump is fast becomming the benchmark. At least acknowledge the difference between north and south. I can only acknowledge the difference between New York, LA and Chicago to the real America on the rust-belts. That's the thing here isn't it. Everyone has abandoned the battler and the working class and also saying they are STUPID! I don’t think the forum is that polarised. There is a strong base for Trump from disenfranchised voters. The economy is doing well right now and he could very well retain power. That is once again very flippant. You said that his supporter base is disenfranchised. Might as well call them silly stupid people like all the other times. Trump was voted for because he was an alternative to the establishment and the people needed a champion that would represent them rather than just give them jingoistic promises. Yes the economy is doing well because Trump policies are actually not that bad. He has done a lot. That’s what I mean by disenfranchised. OK so you understand then what is going on here, that the masses who voted against the ALP or the Democrats in the USA are the very battlers and working class majorities tryig to put bread on the table. The people who feel betrayed by what is now the looney left and jingoistic feel good, virtue signalers. Why do you still consider the Trumps as being bad when they are the only ones listening to the battlers? I don’t think Trump is the only one listening to the battlers. I would say he is abusing his power for personal gain and that’s most obvious with the Ukraine incident. The question is, do enough people care? Maybe, maybe not. What the hell is the son of someone running for President doing in Ukraine anyway? Its a former Soviet nation who was in conflict with the Russians. We're to believe only he could do that job? Ignorance is a choice so perhaps you could get yourself up to speed here as to why he was there. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hunter_BidenIrrespective of your politics though in what sort of alternate reality that you live in is it acceptable to ask a foreign power to investigate your opponent? He, by his own admission, openly asked a foreign power to interfere in the domestic politics of the US. If Anthony Albanese or Bill Shorten did that then they should go to jail no questions asked. If Hillary did that they'd be calling for a lynching in the streets. LOL It was a terrible decision for Bidens son to be there. Don't believe me, believe the horses mouth: https://time.com/5700615/hunter-biden-joe-poor-judgment/Oh and we move on the impeachment: Here's a running tally of the witnesses presented so far. 1. Taylor ( The Dems Star Witness) and Kent: "The problem with Taylor and Kent's testimony is that Trump remained a peripheral and largely mysterious figure throughout" https://www.theage.com.au/world/north-america/impeachment-hearings-damning-for-trump-but-lacks-fireworks-democrats-need-20191114-p53ah7.html2. Marie Yovanovitch "Her testimony alone would not be sufficient grounds for impeachment" https://www.smh.com.au/world/north-america/trump-s-tweeting-turns-a-bad-day-into-a-disaster-20191116-p53b6b.htmlOne Nothing Burger for the Dems, coming right up! Whether Biden should have been there is moot. Trump asked a foreign government to investigate his opponent. In times gone by decent members of his own party would have forced him to resign. Because you ignored my question I'll ask you again..... Irrespective of your politics though in what sort of alternate reality that you live in is it acceptable to ask a foreign power to investigate your opponent? He, by his own admission, openly asked a foreign power to interfere in the domestic politics of the US.
[/quote] Let me get this straight! You are accusing Trump of asking a foreign power to investigate his opponent now?
Desperate to say the least.
Even if true, who cares? [/quote]lol this thread has hit it's peak. -PB [/quote]agreed, by those who only see their side of the politics.....no matter the dislike of Trump as a person and persona he is recovering alot that the Obama's and fellow leaders could/should have done. The maths back him up them the facts but you can't please them all. [/quote] It's called Trump Derangement Syndrome. People are just hating on Trump for the hell of it despite him putting the runs on the board. It's actually quite sad how some people are so one eyed or brain washed.
|
|
|
Burztur
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 9.1K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+xI'm sure those tax cuts that overwhelmingly went to the rich and allowed companies to buyback their own stocks really helped the little guys. If you honestly believe that Trump is some Gracchi-type tribune of the plebs then you're a fucking gullible moron that fell for his faux-populist rhetoric. Policy outcomes don't really matter at all, it's all about aesthetics and appearing as though you care about the little guy. Why re you resorting to insults? I Do you have ANY idea of what the policy outcomes have been under Trump for the plebs Or is it that you hate Trump and follow what Hollywood, New York and Washington Media tell you and that's as far as you go?FYI: - 6 million jobs added - 500,000 manufacturing jobs added - lowest unemployment in 51 years - 7.6 million job vacancies ie more jobs than people to fill them - Blacks and Hispanics leading the job growth figures, with female Hispanics leading the way - The percentage of Americans living with income below the official poverty line went down to 11.8% of the population in 2018, the lowest level since 2001. - weekly earnings up 2.3 in rel terms - economic growth rate up 2% - food stamp recipients down 15% - 90% more Mexican border apprehensions (there's your Wall) - Home prices up 22% - Home ownership up - Stocks up 30 % - corporate profits up 7% - handgun production down 23% Tax reform in the US was a 30 year in the making project. It was not a function of Trump though. It was a function of Republicans controlling the White House, Senate and Congress. If either were not Republican controlled (like Congress now), it wouldn’t have happened. Hence the rush to push it through. The US have a very outdated tax system which the reforms fixed. It lowered the headline rate from 35% to 21% but also got rid of the deferred tax regime for foreign earnings meaning they now tax foreign earnings like everyone else. The reform also makes hiring in the US more competitive again so this would help with the jobs growth. You’re not going to be better than low cost jurisdictions but you’re tipping the scale back slightly. If the US economy tanks under Trump you'll be blaming it all 100% on Trump. But when it booms you want the Democrats to take credit for it.? Yeah, nah. The share markets went through the roof more or less immediately after he got in. Tarriffs don't work, right? Wrong. The Chines product now costs more so the US consumer might buy a competing product which is better value. This hurts the Chinese. If they buy the Chinese product anyway, the tax goes to the government and the money stays within the US to be spent on the US people. Either way the Chinese need to come to the party rather than undercutting the world with cheap labor and at the same time opening ther markets to the world Trump has more than enough positives he could claim his own in the election campaign, if he could only stop of engaging with the moronic far left Democrats. One serious question. were you-and by you I mean all the other Trump haters-before I posted them actually aware of any of the economic performance under Trump figures above? Or will you just hate Trump and will do so no matter what? You will see in all my other post that I acknowledge and recognise that the US economy is doing well under Trump. This is why I question whether people actually care about the Ukraine matter at the end of the day.
|
|
|
paulbagzFC
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 44K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x[quote]I'm sure those tax cuts that overwhelmingly went to the rich and allowed companies to buyback their own stocks really helped the little guys. If you honestly believe that Trump is some Gracchi-type tribune of the plebs then you're a fucking gullible moron that fell for his faux-populist rhetoric. Policy outcomes don't really matter at all, it's all about aesthetics and appearing as though you care about the little guy. Why re you resorting to insults? I Do you have ANY idea of what the policy outcomes have been under Trump for the plebs Or is it that you hate Trump and follow what Hollywood, New York and Washington Media tell you and that's as far as you go?FYI: - 6 million jobs added - 500,000 manufacturing jobs added - lowest unemployment in 51 years - 7.6 million job vacancies ie more jobs than people to fill them - Blacks and Hispanics leading the job growth figures, with female Hispanics leading the way - The percentage of Americans living with income below the official poverty line went down to 11.8% of the population in 2018, the lowest level since 2001. - weekly earnings up 2.3 in rel terms - economic growth rate up 2% - food stamp recipients down 15% - 90% more Mexican border apprehensions (there's your Wall) - Home prices up 22% - Home ownership up - Stocks up 30 % - corporate profits up 7% - handgun production down 23% Any fool can spend their way out of trouble. Borrow trillions, give tax cuts left, right and centre and then fuck off into the sunset and let the next bloke worry about it. https://www.washingtonpost.com/business/2019/10/25/us-deficit-hit-billion-marking-nearly-percent-increase-during-trump-era/If you think that's a left wing rag then how about Fox. https://www.foxnews.com/us/us-trade-gap-jumped-to-10-year-high-record-gap-with-chinaor this https://www.foxnews.com/politics/deficits-exploding-and-neither-party-seems-to-careor this https://www.foxnews.com/politics/govt-agency-predicts-trillion-dollar-deficits-for-the-foreseeable-futurethere's dozens of others if you'd care to educate yourself. Tax cuts, spending, and government borrowing money at record low interest is good for the economy More jobs, pay rises, home ownership, more economic opportunity for marginalized groups.less poverty, less crime See previous post on how that looks right now in the US.. If Labour spent like that you'd have a conniption but because Trump....reasons... Have I got that right? How many times have you banged on about Labour spending all of the government's surpluses and wasting the money saved and kicking the can down the road etc etc only for others to have to pick up the bill but for some bizarro reason it's OK for Trump to do it. 1.What is a surplus-its the government taxing more than they needed to run the country. I hate giving a cent more of my money to government than I am required to do, so a surplus?. F that. 2. There is good debt and bad debt. You borrow to buy a house=good debt. To start a business=good debt but more risk. Labor doesn't understand teh difference between good and bad debt. To them, its Someone Else's Money, so who cares? Are You seriously equalling house hold debt to governemnt debt? Its not the same . All governments are in debt. Surpluses are a furphy and are used to pork barrel. We need governments to spend not horde it. Because economics isn't your forte, think of it as your household budget. Can you keep spending more than you earn? You can for a while. And you can keep doing it in proportion to wage or income increases. If you buy a rental property, then that is good debt because your income increases along with your debt. But if you just keep borrowing for things that do not create income and your wage increases don't keep pace, then eventually you will not be able to service your loans and you will have to declare bankruptcy. You will lose everything including the roof over your head. So in order for the State to spend, it has to tax someone. Tax really isn't a problem. It's a necessity. It becomes a problem when Tax is too much and becomes a dissinsentive to investment and business. When it becomes a dissinsentive to business and corporations and also to productivity and workers, they start to cut back and what happens there is they reduce investing, reduce spending and reduce employment. Therefore tax receipts for the State decline further, thus compounding the problems and the deficit. That is why we can only sustainably spend and sustainably borrow. Otherwise what we are doing is actually robbing future generations and our own children. this is the reason why ScoMo won the elections. It's because the vast majority know how the household budget works. The vast majority are trying to balance their own budgets and its proving to be harder and harder. Again houseold debt is nowhere the same as government debt you imbecile. Sustainbly borrow ? You mean give out grants to companies that go bankrupt ? Or dont need Grants in the first place. Stop swallowing the Socialist Cool Aid . Someone always has to pay, one way or the other. Again See Greece. But I don't expect Socialists to understand the concept of Paying For It, because its always Someone Else's Money they spend, so it doesn't matter to them. Until it does. Are we playing conservative talking point bingo or something? -PB
|
|
|
sydneyfc1987
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 10K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x[quote]I'm sure those tax cuts that overwhelmingly went to the rich and allowed companies to buyback their own stocks really helped the little guys. If you honestly believe that Trump is some Gracchi-type tribune of the plebs then you're a fucking gullible moron that fell for his faux-populist rhetoric. Policy outcomes don't really matter at all, it's all about aesthetics and appearing as though you care about the little guy. Why re you resorting to insults? I Do you have ANY idea of what the policy outcomes have been under Trump for the plebs Or is it that you hate Trump and follow what Hollywood, New York and Washington Media tell you and that's as far as you go?FYI: - 6 million jobs added - 500,000 manufacturing jobs added - lowest unemployment in 51 years - 7.6 million job vacancies ie more jobs than people to fill them - Blacks and Hispanics leading the job growth figures, with female Hispanics leading the way - The percentage of Americans living with income below the official poverty line went down to 11.8% of the population in 2018, the lowest level since 2001. - weekly earnings up 2.3 in rel terms - economic growth rate up 2% - food stamp recipients down 15% - 90% more Mexican border apprehensions (there's your Wall) - Home prices up 22% - Home ownership up - Stocks up 30 % - corporate profits up 7% - handgun production down 23% Any fool can spend their way out of trouble. Borrow trillions, give tax cuts left, right and centre and then fuck off into the sunset and let the next bloke worry about it. https://www.washingtonpost.com/business/2019/10/25/us-deficit-hit-billion-marking-nearly-percent-increase-during-trump-era/If you think that's a left wing rag then how about Fox. https://www.foxnews.com/us/us-trade-gap-jumped-to-10-year-high-record-gap-with-chinaor this https://www.foxnews.com/politics/deficits-exploding-and-neither-party-seems-to-careor this https://www.foxnews.com/politics/govt-agency-predicts-trillion-dollar-deficits-for-the-foreseeable-futurethere's dozens of others if you'd care to educate yourself. Tax cuts, spending, and government borrowing money at record low interest is good for the economy More jobs, pay rises, home ownership, more economic opportunity for marginalized groups.less poverty, less crime See previous post on how that looks right now in the US.. If Labour spent like that you'd have a conniption but because Trump....reasons... Have I got that right? How many times have you banged on about Labour spending all of the government's surpluses and wasting the money saved and kicking the can down the road etc etc only for others to have to pick up the bill but for some bizarro reason it's OK for Trump to do it. 1.What is a surplus-its the government taxing more than they needed to run the country. I hate giving a cent more of my money to government than I am required to do, so a surplus?. F that. 2. There is good debt and bad debt. You borrow to buy a house=good debt. To start a business=good debt but more risk. Labor doesn't understand teh difference between good and bad debt. To them, its Someone Else's Money, so who cares? Are You seriously equalling house hold debt to governemnt debt? Its not the same . All governments are in debt. Surpluses are a furphy and are used to pork barrel. We need governments to spend not horde it. Because economics isn't your forte, think of it as your household budget. Can you keep spending more than you earn? You can for a while. And you can keep doing it in proportion to wage or income increases. If you buy a rental property, then that is good debt because your income increases along with your debt. But if you just keep borrowing for things that do not create income and your wage increases don't keep pace, then eventually you will not be able to service your loans and you will have to declare bankruptcy. You will lose everything including the roof over your head. So in order for the State to spend, it has to tax someone. Tax really isn't a problem. It's a necessity. It becomes a problem when Tax is too much and becomes a dissinsentive to investment and business. When it becomes a dissinsentive to business and corporations and also to productivity and workers, they start to cut back and what happens there is they reduce investing, reduce spending and reduce employment. Therefore tax receipts for the State decline further, thus compounding the problems and the deficit. That is why we can only sustainably spend and sustainably borrow. Otherwise what we are doing is actually robbing future generations and our own children. this is the reason why ScoMo won the elections. It's because the vast majority know how the household budget works. The vast majority are trying to balance their own budgets and its proving to be harder and harder. Again houseold debt is nowhere the same as government debt you imbecile. Sustainbly borrow ? You mean give out grants to companies that go bankrupt ? Or dont need Grants in the first place. Stop swallowing the Socialist Cool Aid . Someone always has to pay, one way or the other. Again See Greece. But I don't expect Socialists to understand the concept of Paying For It, because its always Someone Else's Money they spend, so it doesn't matter to them. Until it does. Are we playing conservative talking point bingo or something? -PB I've never considered myself a "leftie" but Enzo and Moron make me feel like I've become one.
(VAR) IS NAVY BLUE
|
|
|
Muz
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 15K,
Visits: 0
|
Enzo wrote:
Tarriffs don't work, right? Wrong. The Chines product now costs more so the US consumer might buy a competing product which is better value. This hurts the Chinese. If they buy the Chinese product anyway, the tax goes to the government and the money stays within the US to be spent on the US people. Either way the Chinese need to come to the party rather than undercutting the world with cheap labor and at the same time opening ther markets to the world You are so ridiculous. If Labour wanted to introduce tariffs you'd be calling them communists for wanting to interfere in the free market but when Trump does it well that's OK. Trump loves telling everyone he's taxing the Chinese but tariffs are a tax on US consumers. It's just that his supporters are too dopey to understand how tariffs actually work. Enzo wrote:
One serious question. Were you-and by you I mean all the other Trump haters-before I posted them actually aware of any of the economic performance under Trump figures above?
Or will you just hate Trump and will do so no matter what? As for your other 'facts' about Trump and the economy try these articles on for size. https://www.marketwatch.com/story/trump-didnt-transform-the-economy-its-mostly-the-same-as-it-was-under-obama-2019-11-12https://www.salon.com/2019/07/09/another-broken-promise-job-creation-under-trump-trails-obama-by-800000/https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/us-politics/trump-obama-jobs-numbers-economy-meet-the-press-a8971181.htmlhttps://www.factcheck.org/2019/11/trumps-economic-falsehoods/https://www.forbes.com/sites/chuckjones/2019/07/05/trump-is-falling-almost-1-million-jobs-short-vs-obama/#b868bf48caa7https://www.washingtonpost.com/business/2019/08/20/trump-v-obama-economy-charts/http://www.msnbc.com/rachel-maddow-show/job-growth-remains-steady-totals-have-slipped-under-trumpLong story short Trump is riding on Obama's coat tails or if you prefer is doing worse on just about every measure.. One little pertinent excerpt for you Enzo seeing you love to quote stock market gains though you can read all about the others if you'd care to inform yourself. The Dow Jones industrial average was up 46 per cent at this point in Obama's presidency versus 25 per cent for Trump. Stocks soared under Obama, and he ended his White House tenure with one of the best gains of any president in modern history. Trump started out with a lot of love from Wall Street as well, especially with his tax cut, but stocks have moved sideways since he began his trade war.
What is it that your demagogue says? "Facts don't care about your 'feelings' ". That's right, they don't.
Member since 2008.
|
|
|
mouflonrouge
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 2.8K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x[quote]I'm sure those tax cuts that overwhelmingly went to the rich and allowed companies to buyback their own stocks really helped the little guys. If you honestly believe that Trump is some Gracchi-type tribune of the plebs then you're a fucking gullible moron that fell for his faux-populist rhetoric. Policy outcomes don't really matter at all, it's all about aesthetics and appearing as though you care about the little guy. Why re you resorting to insults? I Do you have ANY idea of what the policy outcomes have been under Trump for the plebs Or is it that you hate Trump and follow what Hollywood, New York and Washington Media tell you and that's as far as you go?FYI: - 6 million jobs added - 500,000 manufacturing jobs added - lowest unemployment in 51 years - 7.6 million job vacancies ie more jobs than people to fill them - Blacks and Hispanics leading the job growth figures, with female Hispanics leading the way - The percentage of Americans living with income below the official poverty line went down to 11.8% of the population in 2018, the lowest level since 2001. - weekly earnings up 2.3 in rel terms - economic growth rate up 2% - food stamp recipients down 15% - 90% more Mexican border apprehensions (there's your Wall) - Home prices up 22% - Home ownership up - Stocks up 30 % - corporate profits up 7% - handgun production down 23% Any fool can spend their way out of trouble. Borrow trillions, give tax cuts left, right and centre and then fuck off into the sunset and let the next bloke worry about it. https://www.washingtonpost.com/business/2019/10/25/us-deficit-hit-billion-marking-nearly-percent-increase-during-trump-era/If you think that's a left wing rag then how about Fox. https://www.foxnews.com/us/us-trade-gap-jumped-to-10-year-high-record-gap-with-chinaor this https://www.foxnews.com/politics/deficits-exploding-and-neither-party-seems-to-careor this https://www.foxnews.com/politics/govt-agency-predicts-trillion-dollar-deficits-for-the-foreseeable-futurethere's dozens of others if you'd care to educate yourself. Tax cuts, spending, and government borrowing money at record low interest is good for the economy More jobs, pay rises, home ownership, more economic opportunity for marginalized groups.less poverty, less crime See previous post on how that looks right now in the US.. If Labour spent like that you'd have a conniption but because Trump....reasons... Have I got that right? How many times have you banged on about Labour spending all of the government's surpluses and wasting the money saved and kicking the can down the road etc etc only for others to have to pick up the bill but for some bizarro reason it's OK for Trump to do it. 1.What is a surplus-its the government taxing more than they needed to run the country. I hate giving a cent more of my money to government than I am required to do, so a surplus?. F that. 2. There is good debt and bad debt. You borrow to buy a house=good debt. To start a business=good debt but more risk. Labor doesn't understand teh difference between good and bad debt. To them, its Someone Else's Money, so who cares? Are You seriously equalling house hold debt to governemnt debt? Its not the same . All governments are in debt. Surpluses are a furphy and are used to pork barrel. We need governments to spend not horde it. Because economics isn't your forte, think of it as your household budget. Can you keep spending more than you earn? You can for a while. And you can keep doing it in proportion to wage or income increases. If you buy a rental property, then that is good debt because your income increases along with your debt. But if you just keep borrowing for things that do not create income and your wage increases don't keep pace, then eventually you will not be able to service your loans and you will have to declare bankruptcy. You will lose everything including the roof over your head. So in order for the State to spend, it has to tax someone. Tax really isn't a problem. It's a necessity. It becomes a problem when Tax is too much and becomes a dissinsentive to investment and business. When it becomes a dissinsentive to business and corporations and also to productivity and workers, they start to cut back and what happens there is they reduce investing, reduce spending and reduce employment. Therefore tax receipts for the State decline further, thus compounding the problems and the deficit. That is why we can only sustainably spend and sustainably borrow. Otherwise what we are doing is actually robbing future generations and our own children. this is the reason why ScoMo won the elections. It's because the vast majority know how the household budget works. The vast majority are trying to balance their own budgets and its proving to be harder and harder. Again houseold debt is nowhere the same as government debt you imbecile. Sustainbly borrow ? You mean give out grants to companies that go bankrupt ? Or dont need Grants in the first place. Stop swallowing the Socialist Cool Aid . Someone always has to pay, one way or the other. Again See Greece. But I don't expect Socialists to understand the concept of Paying For It, because its always Someone Else's Money they spend, so it doesn't matter to them. Until it does. Are we playing conservative talking point bingo or something? -PB I've never considered myself a "leftie" but Enzo and Moron make me feel like I've become one. You have the scatter brain of one!
|
|
|
mouflonrouge
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 2.8K,
Visits: 0
|
Obama never achieved a single thing for the economy. In fact the opposite was true. He handed over an economy that was not in the best of shape to say the least. BTW, Obama should have introduced tariffs for Chinese products just to give US manufacturing a chance. Australia should have done the same as well. Problem is no one has been willing to apart from Trump and it has paid off too. Trump is kicking a lot of goals, He has the Golden Boot in the bag!
|
|
|
433
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 6.7K,
Visits: 0
|
I honestly wouldn't bother Muz, you're talking to a bloke who thinks the central bank set the exchange rate. You'd make more productive use of your time headbutting a brick wall repeatedly.
|
|
|
mouflonrouge
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 2.8K,
Visits: 0
|
+xI honestly wouldn't bother Muz, you're talking to a bloke who thinks the central bank set the exchange rate. You'd make more productive use of your time headbutting a brick wall repeatedly. Who thinks that?
|
|
|
433
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 6.7K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+xI honestly wouldn't bother Muz, you're talking to a bloke who thinks the central bank set the exchange rate. You'd make more productive use of your time headbutting a brick wall repeatedly. Who thinks that? You, page 744 of the Auspol thread. If you actually look into it, the RBA was not setting interest rates in Australia because the AUD wasn't floated at the time. It was floated by Keating. You appear to not understand the difference between the interest rate and an exchange rate.
|
|
|
Enzo Bearzot
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 4.5K,
Visits: 0
|
Trump riding on Obama's coat tail? What a joke.. The old government gets 6 months credit and the new one 6 months grace. That's politics. The reason why the jobs growth is slowing is because there aren't enough PEOPLE to fill them!. Its basically FULL employment under Trump! Oh and my how the Lefties do LOVE their percentages! In Jan 2009 when Obama was elected, the Dow was sitting on 8000 points. In 2013 it was up to 15000 points, a gain of 7000. When Trump got in in 2016 it was 17,000. Its now at 28,000 a gain of 11000 points. Don't give me percentages. A doubling of something smaller is still something smaller.
|
|
|