thupercoach
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 8.3K,
Visits: 0
|
zimbos_05 wrote:Quick research shows that the first website is anti-islamic. If we do want to pick and choose, then what about this from the wiki page: Quote:We believe that the political reform is the true and natural gateway for all other kinds of reform. We have announced our acceptance of democracy that acknowledges political pluralism, the peaceful rotation of power and the fact that the nation is the source of all powers. As we see it, political reform includes the termination of the state of emergency, restoring public freedoms, including the right to establish political parties, whatever their tendencies may be, and the freedom of the press, freedom of criticism and thought, freedom of peaceful demonstrations, freedom of assembly, etc. It also includes the dismantling of all exceptional courts and the annulment of all exceptional laws, establishing the independence of the judiciary, enabling the judiciary to fully and truly supervise general elections so as to ensure that they authentically express people's will, removing all obstacles that restrict the functioning of civil society organizations, etc Muslim Brotherhood started off as a very strong organisation and people took that extreme to a new level, but they have since denounced violence and began to work on a more democratic and functioning society. Somehow they see burning down churches and restricting women's rights as part of setting up a more democratic and functioning society. Sorry I don't buy it. Yes they started out as fairly apolitical back in the 1920s-30s but much has changed since then. All you have quoted above amounts to nothing more than MB's political advertising/spin. What they instituted in the 12 months they were in power is pretty much the exact opposite of that. Just like communists always advertised that it was only in their countries where people were truly free while putting people in gulags and denying them basic human rights.
|
|
|
|
zimbos_05
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 15K,
Visits: 0
|
thupercoach wrote:Somehow they see burning down churches and restricting women's rights as part of setting up a more democratic and functioning society.
Sorry I don't buy it. Yes they started out as fairly apolitical back in the 1920s-30s but much has changed since then. All you have quoted above amounts to nothing more than MB's political advertising/spin. What they instituted in the 12 months they were in power is pretty much the exact opposite of that.
Just like communists always advertised that it was only in their countries where people were truly free while putting people in gulags and denying them basic human rights.
Its amazing to think that in a democratic election, the people would elect the MB to lead them when all they do is burn down churches and restrict womens rights. You buy one side of propoganda. Silly me to think you would actualyl take all sides in to account and make an informed decision. Continue to browse your ill informed biased websites. Id like to know your view on the term Islamist too. It seems that you all seem to think that once something is considered Islamist, its bad. Its amazing how the media can takes words and make them seem wrong isnt it. Just for the record, my brother was labelled an Islamist by The Australian. Edited by zimbos_05: 21/8/2013 10:18:07 AM
|
|
|
Heineken
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 49K,
Visits: 0
|
A pretty guesome tale out of North Korea. Sort of re-affirming what we probably already know, but don't want to think too much about. Another country with little to no-hope. Quote:North Korean defectors give evidence on prison abusesUN panel in Seoul hears of guards chopping off a man's finger and forcing a mother to kill her own baby Share 19 inShare.0Email Reuters in Seoul theguardian.com, Tuesday 20 August 2013 21.31 AEST Jump to comments (58) The UN panel hears from Shin Dong-hyuk, a North Korean prison camp survivor. Photograph: Kim Hong-ji/Reuters Public executions and torture are daily occurrences in North Korea's prisons, according to testimony from former inmates at a UN commission of inquiry that opened in Seoul on Tuesday.
It is the first time Pyongyang's human rights record has been examined by an expert panel. It denies that it abuses human rights, refuses to recognise the commission and has blocked access to investigators.
Harrowing accounts from defectors now living in South Korea related how guards chopped off a man's finger, forced inmates to eat frogs and a mother to kill her own baby.
"I had no idea at all … I thought my whole hand was going to be cut off at the wrist, so I felt thankful and grateful that only my finger was cut off," said Shin Dong-hyuk, punished for dropping a sewing machine.
Born in a prison called Camp 14 and forced to watch the execution of his mother and brother whom he turned in for his own survival, Shin is North Korea's best-known defector and camp survivor. He said he believed the UN panel was the only way to improve human rights in the isolated and impoverished state.
"Because the North Korean people cannot stand up with guns like Libya and Syria … I personally think this is the first and last hope left," Shin said. "There is a lot for them to cover up, even though they don't admit to anything."
There are 150,000 to 200,000 people in North Korean prison camps, according to independent estimates, and defectors say many inmates are malnourished or worked to death.
After more than 18 months ruling North Korea, Kim Jong-un has shown few signs of changing the rigid rule of his father, Kim Jong-il, and grandfather Kim Il-sung.
Jee Heon-a, 34, told the commission that from the first day of her incarceration in 1999 she discovered that salted frogs were one of the few things to eat.
"Everyone's eyes were sunken. They all looked like animals. Frogs were hung from the buttons of their clothes, put in a plastic bag and their skins peeled off," she said. "They ate salted frogs and so did I."
Speaking softly, she took a deep breath when describing in detail how a mother was forced to kill her own baby. "It was the first time I had seen a newborn baby and I felt happy. But suddenly there were footsteps and a security guard came in and told the mother to turn the baby upside down into a bowl of water," she said.
"The mother begged the guard to spare her, but he kept beating her. So the mother, her hands shaking, put the baby face down in the water. The crying stopped and a bubble rose up as it died. A grandmother who had delivered the baby quietly took it out."
Few experts expect the commission to have an immediate impact, but it will serve to publicise a campaign that has little visibility globally.
"The UN has tried various ways to pressure North Korea over the years in the field of human rights, and this is a way to raise the pressure a bit," said Bill Schabas, professor of international law at Middlesex University.
"But it's obvious that North Korea is a tough nut to crack and the UN's means are limited. There would need to be profound political changes in North Korea to make headway in the field of human rights."
There appeared to be little interest in the issue in Seoul. Only a few dozen people, including journalists, attended the public hearing at a city centre university.
Defectors are largely shunned or ignored in South Korea and eke out an existence in menial jobs, if they have work at all, according to official data.
Kim Jong-un stepped up the nuclear weapons and rocket programmes launched by his father with a third nuclear test and two rocket launches, and emphasises the military in his speeches.
This year, he threatened the United States, South Korea and Japan with a nuclear attack. Although the country's bellicose moves were dismissed as empty rhetoric, Kim succeeded in driving tension on the divided Korean peninsula sharply higher.
The hope of many activists would be for the Kim dynasty to fall and for leaders in Pyongyang to be put on trial at the international criminal court (ICC) in The Hague, although the UN commission says this is not possible for the moment.
On its website, the commission said it was not appropriate to comment on any ICC jurisdiction over potential crimes against humanity as North Korea had not signed the statutes that would enable the court to prosecute.
Activists said word of the commission would seep into North Korea via unofficial contacts maintained by families. "People living their daily lives here don't realise how important this is. It will have a tremendously powerful impact across North Korea," said Kim Sang-hun, the chairman of the Database Centre for North Korean Human Rights, a South Korean group.
http://www.theguardian.com/world/2013/aug/20/north-korean-defectors-prison-abuses
WOLLONGONG WOLVES FOR A-LEAGUE EXPANSION!

|
|
|
Heineken
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 49K,
Visits: 0
|
dp. :oops: :oops: Edited by Heineken: 21/8/2013 10:32:53 AM
WOLLONGONG WOLVES FOR A-LEAGUE EXPANSION!

|
|
|
thupercoach
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 8.3K,
Visits: 0
|
zimbos_05 wrote:thupercoach wrote:Somehow they see burning down churches and restricting women's rights as part of setting up a more democratic and functioning society.
Sorry I don't buy it. Yes they started out as fairly apolitical back in the 1920s-30s but much has changed since then. All you have quoted above amounts to nothing more than MB's political advertising/spin. What they instituted in the 12 months they were in power is pretty much the exact opposite of that.
Just like communists always advertised that it was only in their countries where people were truly free while putting people in gulags and denying them basic human rights.
Its amazing to think that in a democratic election, the people would elect the MB to lead them when all they do is burn down churches and restrict womens rights. You buy one side of propoganda. Silly me to think you would actualyl take all sides in to account and make an informed decision. Continue to browse your ill informed biased websites. Id like to know your view on the term Islamist too. It seems that you all seem to think that once something is considered Islamist, its bad. Its amazing how the media can takes words and make them seem wrong isnt it. Just for the record, my brother was labelled an Islamist by The Australian. Edited by zimbos_05: 21/8/2013 10:18:07 AM And this is perhaps why you take such an extreme position on this. Are you saying that MB DID NOT burn down churches and restrict women's rights? Amongst other things they did... Are you saying that MB just went about their business of establishing a fair, pluralist society where everyone has equal rights and no one is persecuted? Because that is what your quote alleges. I think you live in a parallel universe where you believe that Islam is just misunderstood and atrocities committed by terrorists and extreme Islamist governments in the name of Islam (which they have no problem telling us, it's just that the West has a problem believing them) are really no more than exaggerations by a hostile West and its media. It may be convenient for you to think so as the truth is more difficult to accept. All religious fundamentalists are delusional in this way, not just Muslim ones.
|
|
|
thupercoach
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 8.3K,
Visits: 0
|
Heineken wrote:A pretty guesome tale out of North Korea. Sort of re-affirming what we probably already know, but don't want to think too much about. Another country with little to no-hope. Quote:North Korean defectors give evidence on prison abusesUN panel in Seoul hears of guards chopping off a man's finger and forcing a mother to kill her own baby Share 19 inShare.0Email Reuters in Seoul theguardian.com, Tuesday 20 August 2013 21.31 AEST Jump to comments (58) The UN panel hears from Shin Dong-hyuk, a North Korean prison camp survivor. Photograph: Kim Hong-ji/Reuters Public executions and torture are daily occurrences in North Korea's prisons, according to testimony from former inmates at a UN commission of inquiry that opened in Seoul on Tuesday.
It is the first time Pyongyang's human rights record has been examined by an expert panel. It denies that it abuses human rights, refuses to recognise the commission and has blocked access to investigators.
Harrowing accounts from defectors now living in South Korea related how guards chopped off a man's finger, forced inmates to eat frogs and a mother to kill her own baby.
"I had no idea at all … I thought my whole hand was going to be cut off at the wrist, so I felt thankful and grateful that only my finger was cut off," said Shin Dong-hyuk, punished for dropping a sewing machine.
Born in a prison called Camp 14 and forced to watch the execution of his mother and brother whom he turned in for his own survival, Shin is North Korea's best-known defector and camp survivor. He said he believed the UN panel was the only way to improve human rights in the isolated and impoverished state.
"Because the North Korean people cannot stand up with guns like Libya and Syria … I personally think this is the first and last hope left," Shin said. "There is a lot for them to cover up, even though they don't admit to anything."
There are 150,000 to 200,000 people in North Korean prison camps, according to independent estimates, and defectors say many inmates are malnourished or worked to death.
After more than 18 months ruling North Korea, Kim Jong-un has shown few signs of changing the rigid rule of his father, Kim Jong-il, and grandfather Kim Il-sung.
Jee Heon-a, 34, told the commission that from the first day of her incarceration in 1999 she discovered that salted frogs were one of the few things to eat.
"Everyone's eyes were sunken. They all looked like animals. Frogs were hung from the buttons of their clothes, put in a plastic bag and their skins peeled off," she said. "They ate salted frogs and so did I."
Speaking softly, she took a deep breath when describing in detail how a mother was forced to kill her own baby. "It was the first time I had seen a newborn baby and I felt happy. But suddenly there were footsteps and a security guard came in and told the mother to turn the baby upside down into a bowl of water," she said.
"The mother begged the guard to spare her, but he kept beating her. So the mother, her hands shaking, put the baby face down in the water. The crying stopped and a bubble rose up as it died. A grandmother who had delivered the baby quietly took it out."
Few experts expect the commission to have an immediate impact, but it will serve to publicise a campaign that has little visibility globally.
"The UN has tried various ways to pressure North Korea over the years in the field of human rights, and this is a way to raise the pressure a bit," said Bill Schabas, professor of international law at Middlesex University.
"But it's obvious that North Korea is a tough nut to crack and the UN's means are limited. There would need to be profound political changes in North Korea to make headway in the field of human rights."
There appeared to be little interest in the issue in Seoul. Only a few dozen people, including journalists, attended the public hearing at a city centre university.
Defectors are largely shunned or ignored in South Korea and eke out an existence in menial jobs, if they have work at all, according to official data.
Kim Jong-un stepped up the nuclear weapons and rocket programmes launched by his father with a third nuclear test and two rocket launches, and emphasises the military in his speeches.
This year, he threatened the United States, South Korea and Japan with a nuclear attack. Although the country's bellicose moves were dismissed as empty rhetoric, Kim succeeded in driving tension on the divided Korean peninsula sharply higher.
The hope of many activists would be for the Kim dynasty to fall and for leaders in Pyongyang to be put on trial at the international criminal court (ICC) in The Hague, although the UN commission says this is not possible for the moment.
On its website, the commission said it was not appropriate to comment on any ICC jurisdiction over potential crimes against humanity as North Korea had not signed the statutes that would enable the court to prosecute.
Activists said word of the commission would seep into North Korea via unofficial contacts maintained by families. "People living their daily lives here don't realise how important this is. It will have a tremendously powerful impact across North Korea," said Kim Sang-hun, the chairman of the Database Centre for North Korean Human Rights, a South Korean group.
http://www.theguardian.com/world/2013/aug/20/north-korean-defectors-prison-abuses Good god... Not surprising but horrible. China has to bear a lot of responsibility for this - if not for their backing of the NK regime the place would've fallen apart by now.
|
|
|
zimbos_05
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 15K,
Visits: 0
|
thupercoach wrote: And this is perhaps why you take such an extreme position on this.
Are you saying that MB DID NOT burn down churches and restrict women's rights? Amongst other things they did...
Are you saying that MB just went about their business of establishing a fair, pluralist society where everyone has equal rights and no one is persecuted? Because that is what your quote alleges.
I think you live in a parallel universe where you believe that Islam is just misunderstood and atrocities committed by terrorists and extreme Islamist governments in the name of Islam (which they have no problem telling us, it's just that the West has a problem believing them) are really no more than exaggerations by a hostile West and its media.
It may be convenient for you to think so as the truth is more difficult to accept. All religious fundamentalists are delusional in this way, not just Muslim ones.
I dont hold an extreme position. I hold an informed position. I never once said that the MB were all fair and misundertood. They started off doing bad things and like i already said, went to that extreme. They have since taking things down a notch and now actually intend on good, well for the most part. I do believe Islam is misundertood. You seem to use the word terrorists as way of defining muslim people. I cant stress this point enough, but anyone who acts in a form of violence in the name of Islam other than when defending the religion, is no longer acting under the banner of Islam. To think that when its other religions doing violence, then its just some nutjob, but someone says they doing it under the banner of Islam, and its all of Islam is bad.Islam already denounces all acts of violence unless when defending your religion, things like the crusades and during the time of the Prophet Muhammad PBUH. There has really been no violent threat to Islam in todays society, so anyone acting under the banner of Islam, is no longer acting by Islamic laws or under its banner by default. What truth? You the one who reads biased ill informed websites and then takes them as gospel.
|
|
|
paulbagzFC
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 44K,
Visits: 0
|
Not acting under the banner of Islam, isn't that what Jihad is all about? Isn't that what the aim of Islam was to begin with? To have all lands under Islam and the word of Allah (and to not stop until such a point is reached)? -PB
|
|
|
zimbos_05
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 15K,
Visits: 0
|
paulbagzFC wrote:Not acting under the banner of Islam, isn't that what Jihad is all about?
Isn't that what the aim of Islam was to begin with?
To have all lands under Islam and the word of Allah (and to not stop until such a point is reached)?
-PB What do you mean by, isnt that what Jihad is all about? I seriously hope you not serious. Jihad means struggle. Weve been through this. Talking on these forums is a jihad at the moment. The aim of Islam is not to rule the world. Yes people are encouraged to spread the word of Islam, it is a muslims duty to spread the deen, but not by means of violence, force, intimidation, blackmail or any of those ill advised ways.
|
|
|
paulbagzFC
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 44K,
Visits: 0
|
zimbos_05 wrote:paulbagzFC wrote:Not acting under the banner of Islam, isn't that what Jihad is all about?
Isn't that what the aim of Islam was to begin with?
To have all lands under Islam and the word of Allah (and to not stop until such a point is reached)?
-PB What do you mean by, isnt that what Jihad is all about? I seriously hope you not serious. Jihad means struggle. Weve been through this. Talking on these forums is a jihad at the moment. The aim of Islam is not to rule the world. Yes people are encouraged to spread the word of Islam, it is a muslims duty to spread the deen, but not by means of violence, force, intimidation, blackmail or any of those ill advised ways. Ofc I'm not overly serious, my knowledge on the matter is very limited and I'm only just about to start reading the Quran (Kuran?). My statement was made based on what limited knowledge I have right now hence the reading to get a better idea. -PB
|
|
|
paulbagzFC
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 44K,
Visits: 0
|
|
|
|
zimbos_05
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 15K,
Visits: 0
|
paulbagzFC wrote: Ofc I'm not overly serious, my knowledge on the matter is very limited and I'm only just about to start reading the Quran (Kuran?).
My statement was made based on what limited knowledge I have right now hence the reading to get a better idea.
-PB
Quran is the correct term. I do have to say though, if you are reading the Quran, never take it on face value. You have to read the commentary and try to understand it deeper than what you just read. There are parts in the Quran that are not relevant now as they were revealed at certain times for the time and the situation back then, so they cant be interpreted as something for now. There is a very good commentary that is widely accepted by all scholars, i cant remember the name of the writer. Ill look it up and tell you if you want. He starts of by saying Jihad is not holy war, but according to this dude, he says it is holy war unless the person says otherwise, so lets just assume and take it that Jihad does actually mean holy war. I also find it confusing that he draws the conclusion that Military war is part of Islam when he has basically changed things before to suit his outcome.
|
|
|
paulbagzFC
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 44K,
Visits: 0
|
zimbos, if you could find me that commentary that would be good (and much appreciated) :) -PB
|
|
|
afromanGT
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 77K,
Visits: 0
|
Zimbos, you don't have to defend EVERY Muslim group mentioned on this forum. It IS ok to admit that some of them are assholes.
|
|
|
zimbos_05
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 15K,
Visits: 0
|
paulbagzFC wrote:zimbos, if you could find me that commentary that would be good (and much appreciated) :)
-PB Its the translation and commentary of the Quran by A.Yusuf Ali afromanGT wrote:Zimbos, you don't have to defend EVERY Muslim group mentioned on this forum. It IS ok to admit that some of them are assholes. I do accept that some are assholes, i just dont think the Muslim Brotherhood are. If anything, the military and police are to blame for the problems in Egypt.
|
|
|
afromanGT
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 77K,
Visits: 0
|
zimbos_05 wrote:afromanGT wrote:Zimbos, you don't have to defend EVERY Muslim group mentioned on this forum. It IS ok to admit that some of them are assholes. I do accept that some are assholes, i just dont think the Muslim Brotherhood are. If anything, the military and police are to blame for the problems in Egypt. When you're elected you're there to govern for the whole country, not to introduce Sharia Law to appease a portion of them.
|
|
|
afromanGT
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 77K,
Visits: 0
|
Reports today that one of the teenagers danced and laughed as he was arrested.
|
|
|
paulbagzFC
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 44K,
Visits: 0
|
zimbos_05 wrote:paulbagzFC wrote:zimbos, if you could find me that commentary that would be good (and much appreciated) :)
-PB Its the translation and commentary of the Quran by A.Yusuf Ali Shukran. -PB
|
|
|
zimbos_05
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 15K,
Visits: 0
|
afromanGT wrote:zimbos_05 wrote:afromanGT wrote:Zimbos, you don't have to defend EVERY Muslim group mentioned on this forum. It IS ok to admit that some of them are assholes. I do accept that some are assholes, i just dont think the Muslim Brotherhood are. If anything, the military and police are to blame for the problems in Egypt. When you're elected you're there to govern for the whole country, not to introduce Sharia Law to appease a portion of them. You fail to understand that Muslim countries should try to implement Shariah law where necessary.
|
|
|
Joffa
|
|
Group: Moderators
Posts: 66K,
Visits: 0
|
zimbos_05 wrote:afromanGT wrote:zimbos_05 wrote:afromanGT wrote:Zimbos, you don't have to defend EVERY Muslim group mentioned on this forum. It IS ok to admit that some of them are assholes. I do accept that some are assholes, i just dont think the Muslim Brotherhood are. If anything, the military and police are to blame for the problems in Egypt. When you're elected you're there to govern for the whole country, not to introduce Sharia Law to appease a portion of them. You fail to understand that Muslim countries should try to implement Shariah law where necessary. o Sharia Law doesn't have a great rap around these parts, granted this probably comes from misunderstanding and naivety, but I'd love to hear your take on the positives of Sharia Law.
|
|
|
afromanGT
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 77K,
Visits: 0
|
zimbos_05 wrote:afromanGT wrote:zimbos_05 wrote:afromanGT wrote:Zimbos, you don't have to defend EVERY Muslim group mentioned on this forum. It IS ok to admit that some of them are assholes. I do accept that some are assholes, i just dont think the Muslim Brotherhood are. If anything, the military and police are to blame for the problems in Egypt. When you're elected you're there to govern for the whole country, not to introduce Sharia Law to appease a portion of them. You fail to understand that Muslim countries should try to implement Shariah law where necessary. When majority of your country is against it, you probably shouldn't.
|
|
|
433
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 6.7K,
Visits: 0
|
zimbos_05 wrote:afromanGT wrote:zimbos_05 wrote:afromanGT wrote:Zimbos, you don't have to defend EVERY Muslim group mentioned on this forum. It IS ok to admit that some of them are assholes. I do accept that some are assholes, i just dont think the Muslim Brotherhood are. If anything, the military and police are to blame for the problems in Egypt. When you're elected you're there to govern for the whole country, not to introduce Sharia Law to appease a portion of them. You fail to understand that Muslim countries should try to implement Shariah law where necessary.
|
|
|
zimbos_05
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 15K,
Visits: 0
|
The things is, Shariah Law was given to Muslims as a law for which to live their lives if, Ideally you are a muslim country run by muslims who practice Islam, then you should be using Shariah Law. Now there are some parts of Shariah Law that are outdated or not plausible any more, those parts be changed or done away with.
That is how it works. Until you can comprehend the responsibility of being a leader in Islam, then you wont be able to understand Shariah Law. islam teaches that if you are the leader, then you are responsible for all the people you lead. You will be questioned in the after life on how you led your people and what you did that was of benefit to them rather than harm. As such, Islam also encourages people not to fight for positions of power as, the old saying goes, with great power come greats responsibility.
Many of you think Shariah Law is barbaric and oppressive, but dont actually understand it to understand my point i feel. Its the same way the media attacks Islam and Shariah Law because they dont understand it or understand why certain aspects of it are wanted in western society.
Edited by zimbos_05: 21/8/2013 07:39:34 PM
|
|
|
afromanGT
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 77K,
Visits: 0
|
Quote:Now there are some parts of Shariah Law that are outdated or not plausible any more, those parts be changed or done away with. Then it's not really Sharia Law, is it? #-o
|
|
|
433
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 6.7K,
Visits: 0
|
Sharia law would be ok if it was more moderate, which I guess would be the changes you were referring to.
Edited by 433: 21/8/2013 07:57:38 PM
|
|
|
paulbagzFC
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 44K,
Visits: 0
|
RedKat wrote:So whats the good in Sharia Law and whats the bad? Stoning your slappa GF when she goes out for a night on the piss with her lady friends. -PB
|
|
|
afromanGT
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 77K,
Visits: 0
|
paulbagzFC wrote:RedKat wrote:So whats the good in Sharia Law and whats the bad? Stoning your slappa GF when she goes out for a night on the piss with her lady friends. -PB EVERYBODY GETS STONED!
|
|
|
zimbos_05
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 15K,
Visits: 0
|
afromanGT wrote:Quote:Now there are some parts of Shariah Law that are outdated or not plausible any more, those parts be changed or done away with. Then it's not really Sharia Law, is it? #-o It is. Shariah law, just like any set of laws can be changed and altered for the time. however, it can only be done by those who understand Shariah Law and understand how the changes can be made. This is where Quran and Hadith come in to it. @Redkat I cant tell you exactly the good and the bad, im no scholar on Shariah Law, however i do want to study it and hopefully have a better understanding of it before i go around spouting texts and verses from it without proper knowledge. The key aspect of Shariah Law i do know of is that, 'one must live and abide by the laws of the land in which they preside'. Hence, abiding by Australian law would ultimately be upholding your Islamic obligation that Shariah Law conducts you to do.
|
|
|
afromanGT
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 77K,
Visits: 0
|
zimbos_05 wrote:Hence, abiding by Australian law would ultimately be upholding your Islamic obligation that Shariah Law conducts you to do. Except they don't.
|
|
|
imnofreak
|
|
Group: Moderators
Posts: 35K,
Visits: 0
|
Oh god not this again :lol:
|
|
|