chillbilly
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 6.2K,
Visits: 0
|
Aussie4ever4 wrote:Thanks guys.
All the writing for the 2011 NSW report is weird.
Edited by aussie4ever4: 1/1/2013 12:58:55 AM I think it is the online viewing program makes it look out of focus. Try downloading it as a pdf
|
|
|
|
Roar_Brisbane
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 14K,
Visits: 0
|
AJohn wrote:This topic should be pinned, mainly so that there will be no reason to ever post an expansion post again.
Joffa, get on it lad! It's already in the index.
|
|
|
AJohn
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 9.1K,
Visits: 0
|
This topic should be pinned, mainly so that there will be no reason to ever post an expansion post again.
Joffa, get on it lad!
|
|
|
Glory Recruit
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 13K,
Visits: 0
|
No to 2nd Perth until Perth Glory consistently get over 15k. 2nd Perth team should be South of river though.
|
|
|
kavorka
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 647,
Visits: 0
|
As I've stated before, what I would like to see is Gallop lay some guidelines as to the requirements for the entry of new clubs.
An ideal timeline would be to add 2 new teams when the next tv deal expires....ie 2016/2017
FFA has 5 years of planning, so in theory if done properly, they shouldn't fck it up.
1. Only cities with a rectangular stadium to be considered (ideally 8k - 15k in size) - thus rental costs are lower and the viewing experience is much more enjoyable
2. New teams to enter a Youth and Women's side for a minimum of 2 years before a senior team is created - thus establishing grass roots first and eliminating the fly by night billionaires who are only in it to make a quick buck (ie your Clive Palmer's etc).
3. No teams to be named after general areas (ie North Queensland, New Zealand, Tasmania, South Coast etc)...I believe each team should be named after the city they reside in, not a whole region. This forges more of an identity rather than a plastic one
The only real candidates I see in the next 10 years are:
Auckland Wollongong Canberra (I don't seen this working if playing out of Bruce Stadium) Perth 2 (ie Fremantle out of a small boutique stadium?) any smaller town with a 10k or less boutique stadium (eg Ballarat, Launceston, Ipswich etc)
People need to get it out of their heads that bigger is better...all we need are small boutique stadiums, that enable clubs to be run on a shoe string budget. The new TV deal will take care of the salary cap.
I mention Perth because it is the fastest growing capital city by a long shot, ie it is putting on over 50k people a year. In 2017 this will equate to an extra 250,000 people. It is a city of the future and some groundwork needs to be done. If they didn't have such a shitty stadium to contend with I have no doubt Perth Glory would have been the most successful franchise in Australia. Hopefully this new stadium might be a catalyst.
Also, Auckland needs to be revisited, there needs to be some research done in to why Wellington can be such as success yet Auckland, a city 3 times the size of Wellington, was a failure. Perhaps with Wellington in the picture this might encourage more people to get behind the club. Maybe promote an existing club such as Auckland City?
|
|
|
GDeathe
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 2.1K,
Visits: 0
|
The system I propose is that any new licenses should be awarded on a seasonal basis to the states feds that adopt the NCR recommendations using the same system the AFC uses to award ACL spots,clubs are qualified in to the A-league as if it is a champions league.
The aim of this to provide a reward and incentive program that would:
- Elevate exisiting state competitions - Track the state feds progress in adopting the NCR - Develop a strong competitive federalism between the states
Benifits to the A-league
- Improve AFC and ACL standing by providing the A-league: 33+ rounds and a P+R system that protects existing comercal interests - Opens the league to new markets - Creation of new derbies - A constant source of backup if a license has to be returned to the FFA
Implementation The system will be piloted in the following stages Stage 1 Starting Season: 2014-15 (new TV Deal) Spots: 2 Stage 2 Starting Season: 2017-18 (next TV Deal) Spots: 6(4 + 4 half spots)
|
|
|
stefcep
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 5.7K,
Visits: 0
|
So 5 pages of people picking LOCATIONS, driven by people's own agenda's, even Gold Coast mentioned FFS, as if "we build it then they will come"
Look folks, if the history of the A-league has taught me one thing is that "Build and they will come" doesn't work!
The Number 1 reason for clubs failing has been the owners because they simply have NFI about how to run a football club. Yeah blame the FFA's WC Bid blah blah blah but every club they've had to take over has come out better on the other side that what they were in the hands of the private owners! And look at Western Sydney for showing how to start a club and make it work.
Expansion should not even be considered until we have owners-preferably multiple owner- who:
1. Understand how to run a sports club 2. Understand football in Australia 3. Have deep pockets that they won't mind risking if they become lighter.
Without the above, picking locations is just pissing in the wind.
|
|
|
Roar_Brisbane
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 14K,
Visits: 0
|
Gyfox wrote:Roar_Brisbane wrote:Just came across this. Quote:Football Queensland (FQ) is a not for profit organisation that is responsible for the administration of football (soccer) in Queensland, including the sanctioning and conduct of football competitions. It is a member federation of Football Federation Australia and has 70,000 registered male and female football players.http://www.footballqueensland.com.au/index.php?display=item&id=1683 I also remember reading a newspaper article a while back saying Qld had the second highest participation in the country. Queensland has been the second largest behind NSW for decades. Northern NSW was third but Victoria passed it a year or so ago. Both have just over 50k registered players. If I recall correctly there was a piece in the news earlier this year that reported that Queensland had about a 10% drop in registrations. I think it was to do with the increasing costs but my memory is hazy. They actually mention this in the link I posted.
|
|
|
Gyfox
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 13K,
Visits: 0
|
Roar_Brisbane wrote:Just came across this. Quote:Football Queensland (FQ) is a not for profit organisation that is responsible for the administration of football (soccer) in Queensland, including the sanctioning and conduct of football competitions. It is a member federation of Football Federation Australia and has 70,000 registered male and female football players.http://www.footballqueensland.com.au/index.php?display=item&id=1683 I also remember reading a newspaper article a while back saying Qld had the second highest participation in the country. Queensland has been the second largest behind NSW for decades. Northern NSW was third but Victoria passed it a year or so ago. Both have just over 50k registered players. If I recall correctly there was a piece in the news earlier this year that reported that Queensland had about a 10% drop in registrations. I think it was to do with the increasing costs but my memory is hazy.
|
|
|
Roar_Brisbane
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 14K,
Visits: 0
|
Just came across this. Quote:Football Queensland (FQ) is a not for profit organisation that is responsible for the administration of football (soccer) in Queensland, including the sanctioning and conduct of football competitions. It is a member federation of Football Federation Australia and has 70,000 registered male and female football players.http://www.footballqueensland.com.au/index.php?display=item&id=1683 I also remember reading a newspaper article a while back saying Qld had the second highest participation in the country.
|
|
|
Glory Recruit
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 13K,
Visits: 0
|
Thanks guys.
All the writing for the 2011 NSW report is weird.
Edited by aussie4ever4: 1/1/2013 12:58:55 AM
|
|
|
Gyfox
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 13K,
Visits: 0
|
Aussie4ever4 wrote:Hey Gyfox is there any way i can get football participation numbers for different cities/areas? The ABS does participation rates in each State or Territory but it doesn't break it down into Regions. The only place you can get it broken into areas is in the State Annual Reports where Areas/Associations player registrations are given. Good luck finding anything published for Queensland although I understand if you ask nicely they might give you info over the phone. Edited by gyfox: 1/1/2013 12:54:22 AM
|
|
|
chillbilly
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 6.2K,
Visits: 0
|
Aussie4ever4 wrote:Roar_Brisbane wrote:Aussie4ever4 wrote:Hey Gyfox is there any way i can get football participation numbers for different cities/areas? Try the ABS. Dunno what too enter in the search:p Look up the state association websites and find their annual reports. Here Football NSW's it includes all the associations playing numbers on page 30. You will have to add it up yourself if you want numbers for each city. http://www.scribd.com/doc/85437435/2011-Football-NSW-Annual-Report?secret_password=2o3zeryfri3jigypu226
|
|
|
Joffa
|
|
Group: Moderators
Posts: 66K,
Visits: 0
|
Have you got a link for the second article? Thanks
|
|
|
Glory Recruit
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 13K,
Visits: 0
|
http://sportsbusinessinsider.com.au/news/wollongong-fails-to-raise-cash-for-w-league-bid/Quote:Wollongong’s hopes of joining W-League next season stalled at the starting line with Football South Coast unable to find an investor to cover a $200,000 bond required to accompany the bid proposal. FSC CEO Bill Kostandas said the organisation would revisit a bid in future. Football Federation Australia met late last week to determine the competition structure for the 2012-13 season, but wasn’t presented with a submission from FSC, reported the Illawarra Mercury on Tuesday. An announcement on the competing teams is expected later this week.
‘‘The start-up costs weren’t so much the issue as the bond,’’ Kostandas told the paper. ‘‘For this year I think it’s dead in the water, but going forward it’s on our radar.
‘‘I think there’s a definite possibility, if not a probability, we’ll have a team down here [in the future].
‘‘It has to be because it’s part of the whole pathway. The game is growing a lot in the female area here and we’re starting to produce some elite players and coaches.’’”
The region has a strong team in Illawara Stingrays and has shown good support for a Matildas international match at WIN Stadium this weekend.
Questions have been raised about the W-League’s viability and Perth Glory owner Tony Sage threatened to withdraw its W-League team.
Illawarra women’s football administrator Rob McKie, part of the steering committee established to drive the bid, was fearful the growth of women’s football would now stall without a W-League side.
‘‘My personal opinion is it would have been an ideal opportunity to get another national team in,’’ McKie said. ‘‘I put my heart and soul into it for six months and we didn’t even put in a proposal.’’
The region also failed in a bid to join the A-League when Sydney Rovers, a “Western Sydney”based franchise that never made it to the field, were handed a licence ahead of the South Coast and Canberra.
|
|
|
Glory Recruit
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 13K,
Visits: 0
|
Sth Coast won't 'climb dead bodies' for A-League Quote: Sth Coast won't 'climb dead bodies' for A-League
Nathan Tinkler has one less thing to worry about - a Wollongong consortium won't be clamouring for an A-League licence at the expense of his debt-ridden Newcastle Jets.
Football South Coast chairman Eddy De Gabriele poured cold water on the suggestion his organisation could make an opportunistic play for an A-League berth, despite Tinkler's financial freefall.
The Australian Tax Office yesterday moved to wind up Tinkler's troubled Hunter Sports Group (HSG), the parent company of the Jets and Newcastle Knights, over unpaid debts of $2.7 million.
But De Gabriele re-affirmed his position that the Jets were integral to the long-term viability of regional football, refusing to pitch for A-League inclusion should the franchise fold.
"I don't want to be seen as Football South Coast climbing over dead bodies of other regional bodies to make a regional impression," he said.
"We need to maintain our integrity.
"You can't have things thrust upon you in a regional community because we don't have the capacity capital cities have," he said.
"If we really subscribe to a regional football strategy then Wollongong should support Newcastle to ensure it maintains its position."
De Gabriele hinted a Wollongong A-League franchise remained a "medium-term" goal after failed attempts in the past.
On the issue of football in the region having a national presence, De Gabriele said: "Our immediate bid is for a W-League and a National Youth League.
"That gives a pathway to go to the top of the women's league and the top of the men's league through the youth league. The youth league will give us an investment bank.
"If we can create an investment bank all the other clubs will want to buy our young players and that creates a lot of interest for us. That's short term [the goal]."
Football Federation Australia released a short statement yesterday saying it had been given assurances by HSG the club's operations would not be affected.
A spokesperson for HSG said it was surprised by the ATO's actions, claiming "any outstanding sum will be paid as soon as possible".
Labelling Tinkler's private ownership model a "high risk" one, De Gabriele suggested stunted Wollongong A-League bids in the past had been built on the right model.
http://www.illawarramercury.com.au/story/1185289/sth-coast-wont-climb-dead-bodies-for-a-league/Edited by aussie4ever4: 1/1/2013 12:52:59 AM
|
|
|
Glory Recruit
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 13K,
Visits: 0
|
Quote:The South Coast's crusade for an A-League team of its own is over after bid chairman Eddy De Gabriele conceded the Wollongong consortium must embrace western Sydney to have any hope of being included in 2010-11.With Football Federation Australia (FFA) to name two new expansion franchises in June, De Gabriele proclaimed a team playing home games at WIN Stadium without an upgraded western grandstand would not be admitted.That, plus the FFA's desire for a team in western Sydney, prompted the South Coast bid - which planned to play all its games in Wollongong - to revamp its proposal to include centres such as Parramatta and Campbelltown in its territory.De Gabriele admitted that if the enhanced bid gained entry, A-League games would only be played at WIN Stadium once the western grandstand was improved.Matches would be split between western Sydney and Wollongong if or when the State Government approved a new grandstand at WIN Stadium."The western grandstand is going to be a problem for us and we have taken on board that the FFA want a presence in western Sydney," De Gabriele said."The first season, we would have problems playing there (WIN Stadium)."They don't believe that WIN Stadium's western grandstand is a venue for A-League."De Gabriele said the compromise - the new club playing in western Sydney until WIN Stadium was improved - was the South Coast's best hope for A-League football.NSW Premier Nathan Rees said in November an upgrade was not on the Government's list of priorities and De Gabriele didn't expect an announcement before the two new teams were announced.''I'm not confident we'll get a decision on the western grandstand in the next two months and that would scuttle the South Coast A-League bid,'' De Gabriele said.''If we don't get the money by June we won't get it (an A-League licence).''De Gabriele conceded the club could no longer be known as South Coast, but vowed it wouldn't be called Parramatta or West Sydney.However, Parramatta Stadium was an ''obvious'' candidate for Leg 1the outfit's home base if it gains entry for the sixth A-League season.The South Coast bid is competing with groups from Canberra, Tasmania and western Sydney for the 12th spot - a second Melbourne franchise is all but assured of securing the 11th licence. Expansion clubs North Queensland Fury and Gold Coast United will become the A-League's ninth and 10th teams in August.The Wollongong bid started considering its options in February after FFA chief executive Ben Leg 2Buckley publicly endorsed the possibility of South Coast expanding to Sydney's west.De Gabriele said the bid had two choices: stand pat and risk missing out completely or embrace Sydney's west and take the inside running.''What we'll be saying to the FFA is our board is from here, but here is our enhanced bid, you want western Sydney - we'll do that for you, but we want South Coast too,'' De Gabriele said.He was confident the State Government would fund a new Leg 3stand if the FFA granted his group an A-League licence.''If we got an A-League licence I would be very confident that the State Government would support the funds for the redevelopment of the western grandstand,'' De Gabriele said.''When the western grandstand gets done we would move games to WIN Stadium.''De Gabriele said the club's training and administration facilities would still be based at North Wollongong PCYC, per the original Wollongong-only bid. http://www.illawarramercury.com.au/story/615969/south-coasts-a-league-hopes-dashed/I am so glad this didnt go through, a Western Sydney and Wollongong team but not named either, this shouldnt of even been considered.
|
|
|
RedshirtWilly
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 7.4K,
Visits: 0
|
williamn wrote:chris wrote:There is romance and there is reality
Ofcourse there are many attributes by having more regional teams - but where will the commerce come from???
HAL needs 12 teams asap
There are currently 10 teams with no tolerance for any 1 of these teams to default as it would break the TV deal and create a clause of a magnitude that will clobber the game from end to end
More than anything else that is why 12 teams are required - as a back and a level of tolerance to protect the revenue and credibility
reality is a 3rd team in both Sydney and Melbourne within the next 2 years due to commerce
Having a 3rd Sydney team playing some games in Canberra and a 3rd Melbourne team playing some games in Tassie
Commerce - Ticked Regional - Ticked awful idea Quite.. 2 teams in Sydney and Melbourne (who seems indifferent to having 2 as it is) is fine. Expanding for the sole purpose of social interaction is a little dumb. There has to be a market for a 3rd team first as there was for WS
|
|
|
williamn
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 5.1K,
Visits: 0
|
chris wrote:There is romance and there is reality
Ofcourse there are many attributes by having more regional teams - but where will the commerce come from???
HAL needs 12 teams asap
There are currently 10 teams with no tolerance for any 1 of these teams to default as it would break the TV deal and create a clause of a magnitude that will clobber the game from end to end
More than anything else that is why 12 teams are required - as a back and a level of tolerance to protect the revenue and credibility
reality is a 3rd team in both Sydney and Melbourne within the next 2 years due to commerce
Having a 3rd Sydney team playing some games in Canberra and a 3rd Melbourne team playing some games in Tassie
Commerce - Ticked Regional - Ticked awful idea
|
|
|
petszk
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 4.2K,
Visits: 0
|
chris wrote: Having a 3rd Sydney team playing some games in Canberra and a 3rd Melbourne team playing some games in Tassie
Commerce - Ticked Regional - Ticked
Yuck. Playing "home" games in other states is one of the things that makes the AFL such a joke.
|
|
|
Glory Recruit
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 13K,
Visits: 0
|
Roar_Brisbane wrote:Aussie4ever4 wrote:Hey Gyfox is there any way i can get football participation numbers for different cities/areas? Try the ABS. Dunno what too enter in the search:p
|
|
|
chris
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 3.6K,
Visits: 0
|
There is romance and there is reality
Ofcourse there are many attributes by having more regional teams - but where will the commerce come from???
HAL needs 12 teams asap
There are currently 10 teams with no tolerance for any 1 of these teams to default as it would break the TV deal and create a clause of a magnitude that will clobber the game from end to end
More than anything else that is why 12 teams are required - as a back and a level of tolerance to protect the revenue and credibility
reality is a 3rd team in both Sydney and Melbourne within the next 2 years due to commerce
Having a 3rd Sydney team playing some games in Canberra and a 3rd Melbourne team playing some games in Tassie
Commerce - Ticked Regional - Ticked
|
|
|
petszk
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 4.2K,
Visits: 0
|
KiwiChick1 wrote:Was ready to say "not this again..." but good work for actually making a proper thread of it (Y) x2
|
|
|
petszk
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 4.2K,
Visits: 0
|
paladisious wrote:[url=http://rs.442.com.au/forums/default.aspx?g=posts&t=42743 wrote: Age 22, he covered his first game at Queen Park Rangers'Loftus Rd as a photographer and a few years later and a few years later and years later enjoyed his "greatest sporting experiance ever" at the 1990 World Cup final in Rome.
Seems to be a bit of an echo in here...
|
|
|
utd_19
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 482,
Visits: 0
|
YESSS give us something down here in wollongong! there are so many people like me who want to support an a-league club but have nobody to support in our local area..
all we have here is st george illawarra dragons, which we are very proud of but we need a football club
|
|
|
Roar_Brisbane
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 14K,
Visits: 0
|
Aussie4ever4 wrote:Hey Gyfox is there any way i can get football participation numbers for different cities/areas? Try the ABS.
|
|
|
williamn
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 5.1K,
Visits: 0
|
since i'm a dreamer:
11. canberra united (stripes with two shades of green similar to st ettiene) 12. wollongong wolves (white shirt, red shorts and socks) or (red shirt, white shorts and socks similar to arsenal) 13. tasmania united/timbers (shade of green similar to springboks) 14. auckland city/united/knights (home: navy blue shirt, shorts and white socks as auckland city currently wears) (away: all red kit of waitekere) 15. geelong city fc (blue and white hoops/stripes similar to porto) 16. northern thunder (blue shirt, white shorts and yellow socks)
|
|
|
Glory Recruit
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 13K,
Visits: 0
|
Hey Gyfox is there any way i can get football participation numbers for different cities/areas?
|
|
|
Glory Recruit
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 13K,
Visits: 0
|
Added some links to OP, thanks to Paladisious for some of the links.
|
|
|
Glory Recruit
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 13K,
Visits: 0
|
Quote:Are we still that xenophobic in 2012 that an AUTRALIAN football team started by migrants is frowned upon?? man get over it already - this has happened in countries all over the world - Clubs created by British people who were in a forign country far from home and wanted to start a club so they can play a game from home that they missed against *gasp* other teams started by other immigrants who may have been from Italy etc..
People dont care what race or nationality the people who started the club were, people care about what identity the club takes and who it trys too appeal too.
|
|
|