Mine would have to be 1 degree south. The equatorial vibe mixed with the general solidity of the Southern Hemisphere makes this a clear winner for me.

+1

Thursday afternoon FFT sure is bored.

It's Wednesday.

:lol: :lol: :lol:

My favourite latitude is wherever Afros Mum is - which is generally 2-3º wide at any one time.

I hold a soft spot for 20 degrees south, although 55 degrees north and 40 degrees south can go to hell

40 degrees North. Why? Fuck you thats why.

51.5171•N, 0.1062•W

65 degrees North is another favourite of mine

Shoe Lane, London. Why?

And you wonder why people think you're a dick. Seriously. ](*,)

Who said I wonder?

Notorganic outed as an adulterous chubby-chaser. Does the grey hair do it for you too champ? You read it here first guys.

Drapes match the curtains - it's like forcing open a grilled cheese sandwich.

Save your petty infighting for another thread guys, this thread is reserved for latitudes dammit

notorganic didn't notice the 'l'.

latitudes or Iatitudes?

Lmfao

Edited by aussie4ever4: 16/1/2013 06:50:46 PM

This is very interesting

Iatitudes

This thread =

Well then, I'm in exactly the right place.

It's a thread about latitudes

Edited by Mozilla: 16/1/2013 07:10:44 PM

And pulling apart grilled cheese sandwiches. 8-[

Nope, it's only about latitudes

It's a metaphor.

I think some people in this thread have a serious lattitude problem

I'll show myself out.

Yes it, is

How is it possible to 'show yourself out' on an online forum?

There's only one way. Nhub has to kill himself live on YouTube.

I support a thousand latitudes.

Joke's old bro. Move on.

Will there be a thread for our favourite longitude too?

A greasy one at that.

You seem to have no qualms with repeating yourself...

OK

I like how when I use the joke it's "jokes old", but when other people use it, they get a +1 or a "This" :lol:

What would it be like if notor and afro had an anti-man-love baby?

Sorry to hijack the thread but I had to ask. Although I have a feeling it's probably been asked before.

It'd be avy1990.

18.2167° S, 32.7500° E

Near where you're from?

Probably about 3-4 hours away.

37°49'31.00"S 144°58'58.42"E

Seat R323.

By African and Australian standards, that's near :lol:

Did you google it?

What is funny now when i think of it. It was only a short trip away, but we would leave at like 9/10 am and only get there at about 5/6 at night. We would stop at a place called halfway house. Such a nice place, have lunch and there would be this big are where us kids would run around and play whilst the parents did a bit of shopping. Then as we were about to leave our parents would call us and let us choose some sweets to buy and we would take them.

Then as we got closer to our resort, we would stop at this fruit place, freshest fruit ever. Again nice are for the kids to play around and stuff, had these really cool carvings and hand made items. Eventually wed get to the resort all buggered because a 4 hour trip offered became 7/8 hours.

Present latitude: 37deg South

Furthest North: 41deg
Furthest South: 41deg

Present latitude: 37deg South

Furthest North: 59deg
Furthest South: 42deg

14.5833 n ,121.000 e

Why not ditch attitudes for platitudes?

Because latitude is inversely proportionate to gratitude, with an arguable exception for the mid-eastern longitude.

Could be wrong, but I think you'll find that the distribution of landmass is somewhat similar to that distribution also. Correlation, not necessarily causation, though.

So you're saying that the spikes around southern europe correlate to land mass being larger? I'd have thought that the masses of land across Canada and Russia would disagree with that.

I said similar. I'd say the distribution would be shifted north a bit. But bear in mind, the projection of this map doesn't show equal area across the entire image. A square centimetre in the high latitudes of that map represents a lesser area than a square centimetre at the equator.

Yeah, but the massive land areas in Canada/russia are still going to be significantly greater than the land masses around the equator.

There's probably a stronger correlation between precipitation and population than land mass.