There's only one way. Nhub has to kill himself live on YouTube.

I support a thousand latitudes.

Joke's old bro. Move on.

Will there be a thread for our favourite longitude too?

A greasy one at that.

You seem to have no qualms with repeating yourself...

OK

I like how when I use the joke it's "jokes old", but when other people use it, they get a +1 or a "This" :lol:

What would it be like if notor and afro had an anti-man-love baby?

Sorry to hijack the thread but I had to ask. Although I have a feeling it's probably been asked before.

It'd be avy1990.

18.2167° S, 32.7500° E

Near where you're from?

Probably about 3-4 hours away.

37°49'31.00"S 144°58'58.42"E

Seat R323.

By African and Australian standards, that's near :lol:

Did you google it?

What is funny now when i think of it. It was only a short trip away, but we would leave at like 9/10 am and only get there at about 5/6 at night. We would stop at a place called halfway house. Such a nice place, have lunch and there would be this big are where us kids would run around and play whilst the parents did a bit of shopping. Then as we were about to leave our parents would call us and let us choose some sweets to buy and we would take them.

Then as we got closer to our resort, we would stop at this fruit place, freshest fruit ever. Again nice are for the kids to play around and stuff, had these really cool carvings and hand made items. Eventually wed get to the resort all buggered because a 4 hour trip offered became 7/8 hours.

Present latitude: 37deg South

Furthest North: 41deg
Furthest South: 41deg

Present latitude: 37deg South

Furthest North: 59deg
Furthest South: 42deg

14.5833 n ,121.000 e

Why not ditch attitudes for platitudes?

Because latitude is inversely proportionate to gratitude, with an arguable exception for the mid-eastern longitude.

Could be wrong, but I think you'll find that the distribution of landmass is somewhat similar to that distribution also. Correlation, not necessarily causation, though.

So you're saying that the spikes around southern europe correlate to land mass being larger? I'd have thought that the masses of land across Canada and Russia would disagree with that.

I said similar. I'd say the distribution would be shifted north a bit. But bear in mind, the projection of this map doesn't show equal area across the entire image. A square centimetre in the high latitudes of that map represents a lesser area than a square centimetre at the equator.

Yeah, but the massive land areas in Canada/russia are still going to be significantly greater than the land masses around the equator.

There's probably a stronger correlation between precipitation and population than land mass.