a) ricecrackers provides incontrovertible proof that 97% and climate alarmism is one big hoax by linking a blog that links peer reviewed papers debunking John Cook findings
b) adhominem attacks roll in from several sections of the M80 cult
c) a new poster appears to support arguments provided and provides proof they are who they say they are. someone connected to the blog
d) ricecrackers is accused (without proof) of multiple accounts
e) moderator 'confirms' accusations with no proof
f) ricecrackers disputes false accusations
g) moderator provides more adhominem and juvenile stupidity then threatens to ban ricecrackers and new poster

what a forum

who let this guy be mod?


Edited by ricecrackers: 1/7/2015 08:27:57 PM

Holy shit!

What have I missed? :lol:

1. this is a thread about climate change and you + others of your ilk have turned it into character assassinations
you have also made false claims about 2 seperate members. I know this for a fact.

2. assertion? you're moving the goalposts now, you presented it as a fact. again you lie.

3. i'm not threatening you with anything, all I've stated is I have evidence of your transgressions. if you interpret that as a threat then thats your problem, not mine.

4. accusing you of adhominem, you've done it on the above post. calling me an 'old person' and implying i'm stupid. this is passive aggressive adhominem. I think I know more about the internet than you.

5. you are embarrassed. I dont care what the whole forum thinks, you dont speak for them. I know you're embarrased because you continue to dispense lies about me. You'd only do that if your reputation felt threatened.

6. adhominem exhibit

7. you're the one who joked when someone told me to kill myself and you did nothing about it

also, you're threatening to ban another new member who has been nothing but reasonable in his arguments whilst you've all piled on like a lynch mob. disgusting behavior.

Edited by ricecrackers: 1/7/2015 08:15:06 PM

Still ad hominem, still nonsense.


Made a perfectly valid assertion based on what we can all see. If I was strictly adheering to my responsibility as a mod I'd permaban both accounts, but I'm allowing you the space to represent and embarress yourself on here because I believe in an adult's right to make a fool of himself for the enjoyment of others.


"I'm not threatening you with anything" ... "I have other backed up evidence of your malfeasance" :lol:

Again, waiting on that subpoena.


The previous point in this same post, for starters...


Are you accusing me of something? Maybe you should reach into your stores of saved evidence on me to back that up?


Is this about me or him? He's fine, but quit trying to move those goalposts. Again.


Yeah, egg on my face, the whole forum is laughing at me. :lol:


You seem to care a lot. Don't be upset, it's normal for old people not to know how to use the internet.


Indeed, myself and the other mods have let you get away with far too many transgressions of the rules of these forums due to our shared value of free speech, while applying them harshly on posters we actually like. It does make your claims of persecution rather amusing to read, however.

:lol: this is awesome

1. if you act like a child one can only assume you require remedial education
2. you made a false claim and its not the first time. in your responsibility as a moderator you should only be doing that with evidence otherwise disclaim it as speculation (which you didnt)
3. I'm not threatening you with anything, however the claim by poptech is valid. I have other backed up evidence of your malfeasance as a moderator which I'll save for a rainy day
4. Threats? Where have I threatened you ever? Adhominem attacks? Who initiates those whenever I post evidence that supports my claims (which seems to be unpopular around here). Look at your buddy draupkick, look at all the vile rubbish he spews whenever caught out. Dont try to claim the moral high ground here.
5. You have been embarrassed. You know it and I know it. It doesnt matter what anyone else here thinks - you are desperately trying to protect your reputation by lying and thats all the proof I need because I know you're lying whilst others may not.
6. gifs, memes who cares, both juvenile and add nothing to a discussion other than trivialising it. used in the context you choose proves you have nothing of substance to argue your position
7. internet seems to be a serious business when you decide it is. it works both ways buddy

dont whirlpool have some policy that if it isnt in mainstream media then it cant be linked? and everything else is "conspiracy theory" which is against forum rules?

strange forum, but I take it they dont want to court controversy

Taking the high road there.



Moving goal posts. I can't "prove" it without doxxing you, which, though tempting, I am above doing as I respect the forum's rules.



I'll await the subpoena. :lol:



I'm just referring back to things you've said yourself, I'm not the one flinging ad hominem attacks and baseless threats around here, pal.







Did you know that gifs and memes aren't the same thing? Also glad to see you resort straight back to ad hominems.



Judge Ricey presiding; because the internet is SERIOUS BUSINESS.

As mentioned earlier, Poptech is legitimate - he was banned from Whirlpool forums, after linking blogs in the climate change thread.

#classicCrackers

wrong. I never claimed you were in high school.
I told you where you belong.

now where's that proof I have a multi as you claimed?

poptech is correct when he suggests your claim is libel

who do you think you are to marginalise posters and lie about their legitimacy, as a mod?

you've been embarrassed totally and you've got nothing left but to post childish memes because thats where your level of maturity is at - that is an open and shut case

Vintage Ricey, ignoring what you yourself wrote in your last post when you've painted yourself into yet another corner.

who said you were in high school?
you belong in kindergarten

ok. so provide your proof that I'm in high school, otherwise you're just providing baseless accusations

this should be good

Get back to me when you finish high school.

thats your proof?
a juvenile meme?

Edited by paladisious: 1/7/2015 06:27:27 PM

ok. so provide your proof, otherwise you're just providing baseless accusations

this should be good

For it to be a conspiracy there needs to be more than one person to conspire with.

really? the exact time?
I've been posting in this thread for over a year.

it sounds like you have confirmation bias for a conspiracy theory

It was interesting he appeared at the exact time you needed him to appear.... :-k

I did check the FFA cup thread regularily today, but this thread, right now, well it is the funniest thing that has happened on here in a long time. :lol:
It is a car crash and I can't look away :lol: :lol: :lol:

you're an interesting poster "Poptech"
I hope we hear more from you

its gets exhausting fighting a one man battle against the tide of idiocy

:lol:

But if you are a football fan, why would you waste your time arguing with someone who is doing no more than provoking an argument when you could be discussing one of the most interesting thing that happens in the off season?

[youtube]kQFKtI6gn9Y[/youtube]

YOU WOT MATE! Did you just call me a MULTI. Where's my farkn lawyer!

They should really section off all non football based discussion so as not to confuse anyone.
Call it "penalty time" or "extra time"

meanwhile ... the FFA Cup draw was on today, but it seems that people would rather indulge trolling than discuss football on a football forum??

Ah, he is used to dealing with those who are incapable of getting in touch with the right people.