Edited by paladisious: 1/7/2015 06:27:27 PM

thats your proof?
a juvenile meme?

Get back to me when you finish high school.

ok. so provide your proof that I'm in high school, otherwise you're just providing baseless accusations

this should be good

who said you were in high school?
you belong in kindergarten

Vintage Ricey, ignoring what you yourself wrote in your last post when you've painted yourself into yet another corner.

wrong. I never claimed you were in high school.
I told you where you belong.

now where's that proof I have a multi as you claimed?

poptech is correct when he suggests your claim is libel

who do you think you are to marginalise posters and lie about their legitimacy, as a mod?

you've been embarrassed totally and you've got nothing left but to post childish memes because thats where your level of maturity is at - that is an open and shut case

#classicCrackers

As mentioned earlier, Poptech is legitimate - he was banned from Whirlpool forums, after linking blogs in the climate change thread.

Taking the high road there.



Moving goal posts. I can't "prove" it without doxxing you, which, though tempting, I am above doing as I respect the forum's rules.



I'll await the subpoena. :lol:



I'm just referring back to things you've said yourself, I'm not the one flinging ad hominem attacks and baseless threats around here, pal.







Did you know that gifs and memes aren't the same thing? Also glad to see you resort straight back to ad hominems.



Judge Ricey presiding; because the internet is SERIOUS BUSINESS.

dont whirlpool have some policy that if it isnt in mainstream media then it cant be linked? and everything else is "conspiracy theory" which is against forum rules?

strange forum, but I take it they dont want to court controversy

1. if you act like a child one can only assume you require remedial education
2. you made a false claim and its not the first time. in your responsibility as a moderator you should only be doing that with evidence otherwise disclaim it as speculation (which you didnt)
3. I'm not threatening you with anything, however the claim by poptech is valid. I have other backed up evidence of your malfeasance as a moderator which I'll save for a rainy day
4. Threats? Where have I threatened you ever? Adhominem attacks? Who initiates those whenever I post evidence that supports my claims (which seems to be unpopular around here). Look at your buddy draupkick, look at all the vile rubbish he spews whenever caught out. Dont try to claim the moral high ground here.
5. You have been embarrassed. You know it and I know it. It doesnt matter what anyone else here thinks - you are desperately trying to protect your reputation by lying and thats all the proof I need because I know you're lying whilst others may not.
6. gifs, memes who cares, both juvenile and add nothing to a discussion other than trivialising it. used in the context you choose proves you have nothing of substance to argue your position
7. internet seems to be a serious business when you decide it is. it works both ways buddy

:lol: this is awesome

Still ad hominem, still nonsense.


Made a perfectly valid assertion based on what we can all see. If I was strictly adheering to my responsibility as a mod I'd permaban both accounts, but I'm allowing you the space to represent and embarress yourself on here because I believe in an adult's right to make a fool of himself for the enjoyment of others.


"I'm not threatening you with anything" ... "I have other backed up evidence of your malfeasance" :lol:

Again, waiting on that subpoena.


The previous point in this same post, for starters...


Are you accusing me of something? Maybe you should reach into your stores of saved evidence on me to back that up?


Is this about me or him? He's fine, but quit trying to move those goalposts. Again.


Yeah, egg on my face, the whole forum is laughing at me. :lol:


You seem to care a lot. Don't be upset, it's normal for old people not to know how to use the internet.


Indeed, myself and the other mods have let you get away with far too many transgressions of the rules of these forums due to our shared value of free speech, while applying them harshly on posters we actually like. It does make your claims of persecution rather amusing to read, however.

1. this is a thread about climate change and you + others of your ilk have turned it into character assassinations
you have also made false claims about 2 seperate members. I know this for a fact.

2. assertion? you're moving the goalposts now, you presented it as a fact. again you lie.

3. i'm not threatening you with anything, all I've stated is I have evidence of your transgressions. if you interpret that as a threat then thats your problem, not mine.

4. accusing you of adhominem, you've done it on the above post. calling me an 'old person' and implying i'm stupid. this is passive aggressive adhominem. I think I know more about the internet than you.

5. you are embarrassed. I dont care what the whole forum thinks, you dont speak for them. I know you're embarrased because you continue to dispense lies about me. You'd only do that if your reputation felt threatened.

6. adhominem exhibit

7. you're the one who joked when someone told me to kill myself and you did nothing about it

also, you're threatening to ban another new member who has been nothing but reasonable in his arguments whilst you've all piled on like a lynch mob. disgusting behavior.

Edited by ricecrackers: 1/7/2015 08:15:06 PM

Holy shit!

What have I missed? :lol:

a) ricecrackers provides incontrovertible proof that 97% and climate alarmism is one big hoax by linking a blog that links peer reviewed papers debunking John Cook findings
b) adhominem attacks roll in from several sections of the M80 cult
c) a new poster appears to support arguments provided and provides proof they are who they say they are. someone connected to the blog
d) ricecrackers is accused (without proof) of multiple accounts
e) moderator 'confirms' accusations with no proof
f) ricecrackers disputes false accusations
g) moderator provides more adhominem and juvenile stupidity then threatens to ban ricecrackers and new poster

what a forum

who let this guy be mod?


Edited by ricecrackers: 1/7/2015 08:27:57 PM

wrong.

I never contacted anyone.

I dont know how poptech found this forum, I can only assume he's been doing some vanity searches of links to his blog to determine its propagation

a lot :lol:

I've done nothing on this thread other than defend myself from your wild assertions upon myself and ad hominem attacks for my "crime" of saying "Hey Ricey". Most mods would have banned you for a fraction of these attacks.


I think you need to learn what moving the goalposts means. I used the term correctly in referring to the way you changed the definition of what we were arguing about by demanding I produce proof that you know would contravene forum rules in order to appear the "winner", while you used the term to mean I was wrong in saying "Hey Ricey", and I don't understand how the term can apply. It's hard to keep up with your attacks and assertions, especially when you keep moving the goal posts.


Oh believe me I see you as no threat whatsoever. :lol:

I'm only judging your behaviour for what it is. This forum gives you the opportunity represent yourself, and you have done.


When did I say you were stupid? I was trying to be sympathetic. Lots of older people who aren't up to date with memes and so on contribute plenty to this forum. You aren't one of them, but.


I don't know why you keep asserting this about my own emotional state. Maybe you are misdirecting your need for attention that isn't addressed from your own family and social life into attacks on strangers on the internet, I'm really not sure. In any case I wish you the best in sorting all that out.

The ironic thing is that far from being embarrassed, rekting you on here is only enhancing my reputation on this site, and while generally I try to avoid stooping to the level of addressing you directly in most cases, when you post lies about me and attack my integrity it sometimes becomes too hard to resist.


Sympathising with you and understanding for not knowing the difference between the meanings of different terminology is an attack in your mind? I really feel sorry for you if you see normal conversation like that as a reason to be hostile; most healthy people don't view their world through a lens of hate and rancour.


Wait, so which times am I supposed to take the internet seriously? Wasn't it you that said you can't pick and choose? :-k

:lol: Oh man, why did you wait to post this until after I made the banner? :lol:

answer these questions:

1. are you accusing me of being poptech? YES or NO

2. are you accusing me of having multiple accounts? YES or NO

3. are you accusing me of inviting poptech to this forum? YES or NO

3. why are you threatening to ban poptech?

enough of your passive aggressive weasel words, stay on point

Edited by ricecrackers: 1/7/2015 08:44:33 PM

The boy wonder has painted himself in a corner and is trying to become a martyr. Pala is showing great strength to resist =d>

Oh yay, a whole post of goal post moving after being rekt![/quote]


I'm not sure but I think it's likely. Your heavy reaction has lent credence to this.


I'm not sure but I think it's likely. Your heavy reaction has lent credence to this.


I'm not sure but I think it's likely if you are not poptech yourself. Your heavy reaction has lent credence to this.


Never did. I have said that I would if I rigidly enforced the forums rules which include no multis and no harming of forum atmosphere. I do wonder why I let you get away with so much myself, but a baser part of me does enjoy these little exchanges, and the wider forum does enjoy a laugh at your expense.

On the whole, I think the forum would be better with you gone, but I know full well making a martyr of you would give you the attention that you are seeking, and you'd just be back with yet another multi and yet another chip on your laden shoulders.



It's difficult with you moving the goal posts all over the place, but I am doing my best to keep up.

so by taking a position on climate change that is unpopular with your members, I'm harming the forum atmosphere?

do you realise that several other members, notable mcjules and draupnir continually raise this topic in various football related and other unrelated threads as a means of adhominem whenever I post?

who is harming the forum atmosphere?

my reaction is natural of anyone falsely accused by multiple members with an axe to grind because they dont appreciate my position on this subject

again you're threatening me. this seems to be a theme with you. does it make you feel better about yourself?



yet another multi? I've never had any multis

so there again is proof you're lying again. proof to me because I know the truth.

Edited by ricecrackers: 1/7/2015 09:08:16 PM

Poptech entered and unleashed on all the groupthink.

[youtube]mm_niiQfeWc[/youtube]

Edited by unshackled: 1/7/2015 09:12:51 PM

they'll accuse you of being a multi next

Draupnoir must be watching the latest jon stewart ep for new ammo

When did I mention climate change? Your transgressions against forum atmosphere have consisted of your unsociable demeanour including ad hominem attacks against myself and many other forumers.



Nope, never saw any evidence of this myself. Maybe you're just being a little to precious when people disagree with you?


You, generally. See above.


Never threatened you with anything. You solely represent yourself at all times.

I feel super great, thanks for asking, I've having a lovely evening in and a sleep in tomorrow as my work engagement is not until 12:00. You?


I'm not sure that I believe you on that one.


Proof to you, or proof to the forum? Onus is on you to back your assertions against me, buddy.