you want me to provide evidence that the sun is the largest influence on the earth's climate?
are you fucking kidding me?

:lol:

original claim right there. Evidence or GTFO.

feeling stupid afrodope?

well I thought nobody could be that stupid until I met you



Edited by ricecrackers: 11/6/2014 02:05:47 PM

Are you fucking shitting me? Nobody can be this stupid.

Just kill yourself. Seriously.

lets just remove the sun altogether then

what kind of climate do you think the earth will have then afrodope?

you claimed that the sun wasnt the most influential factor on the earth's climate
seriously, you claimed that

smack yourself in the head (twice)

The claim: that the sun is the most influential thing in climate change.

The claim was made by you. The onus is upon YOU to produce evidence.

You do realise that you're talking about something that takes place over the course of 24,000 years and 14 years is essentially negligible, right?

The "warming phase" ended some 8,000 years ago and we're currently close to the Perigee apsis of our orbit.

show me your evidence there has been warming for the past 15 years

we're going into a cool phase
this is the end of the warming period

comprehension fails you for the nth time

your data ends at 2000. um that'd be 14 years ago right?


Edited by ricecrackers: 11/6/2014 01:45:45 PM

you people have a bullshit explanation for when your predictions continue to fail
credibility is non existent

We're in a cooling phase at the moment http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19729653

The biggest issue is that at present there are massive heat sinks in the Antarctic, the Arctic and the world's oceans that are soaking up the majority of warming for the time being.

By way of analogy if you put a glass of hot water in a chest freezer full of ice to reach equilibrium there will be a massive drop in the temperature of the water in the glass and only a slight, almost imperceptible, raising in the overall temperature of the "system".

Put that same glass in an empty freezer and the temperature of the "system" will rise, in magnitude, many times more compared to the former example.

The issue will be what happens after the earth loses it's ability to soak up the constant input of heat.

The problem is it is hundreds of years from happening hence Crackers and the rest of them.

You obviously know what you are talking about. I would love to read your peer reviewed papers on the subject so I can get better informed, or maybe you can point me towards the various journals and scientific institutes that have published your work.

*insert graphs and evidence here*

-PB

we are going into a cooling cycle
there is no warming. there has been no warming for 15 years

If the earth's orbit and Milankovitch Cycles were responsible for a change in climate as you've previously attempted to contend then the fact that we're going through what should be, according to the theory, a cooling stage in the cycle instead of the global increase in temperatures means that you're just outright wrong.

So shut up and stop spouting bullshit you don't even understand.

biology bloggers?

And obviously you know better than the various expert scientists that speak to the contrary.

i think anyone that claims the sun isn't the largest influence on the earth's climate has rocks in their head
just my opinion though

my link cited direct quotes from a polar bear specialist. someone actually credible in the field they were commenting on.

your science blog piece was merely opinion by someone who has no qualifications in climate science much less astrophysics and you base its credibility on page views.

you see your entire position on climate change is not based in science at all and this is consistent with your approach in general...ie science = whoever makes the most noise

Stormfront is not testifying to scientific accuracy.

You can't claim that iflscience doesn't have enough credibility after posting a piece from The Daily Caller.

stormfront has a lot of traffic too i hear

iflscience began as a facebook page and has since blossomed into a high-traffic website and will soon be a serialised television show. It's got more credibility than you do.

really? so they're getting paid for those articles?

iflscience is a bit more than an 'amateur blog'.

you copy and pasted an amateur blog :lol:

Hey! That's my big word. Find your own.

Stop skimping out and being lazy or you will keep losing :lol:

Checkmate.

-PB