Poptech
|
|
Group: Banned Members
Posts: 27,
Visits: 0
|
Glenn - A-league Mad wrote:Welp. There is the proof. Rice Crackers seems like a reasonable person....
There is no way he could control the twitter account of a blogging site he may run (unconfirmed).
It is now #TWITTER_OFFICIAL :lol: Your conspiracy theory is obviously more plausible.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Glenn - A-league Mad
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 5.2K,
Visits: 0
|
Poptech wrote:Glenn - A-league Mad wrote:Welp. There is the proof. Rice Crackers seems like a reasonable person....
There is no way he could control the twitter account of a blogging site he may run (unconfirmed).
It is now #TWITTER_OFFICIAL :lol: Your conspiracy theory is obviously more plausible. Well obviously Im having a good laugh here. But really Rice Crackers was accused of being Andrew K. very soon after a new Account appears claiming to be Andrew K. The not unreasonable question of "did Ricey create the Poptech account to prove he is not that person" was asked. So taking that accusation as plausible (which it is) Ricecrackers asked poptech to tweet to prove he is different. From this view, Ricey has asked himself to tweet from one of his multi accounts that he is not lying? You do see how this is looking? :lol: :lol: :lol:
|
|
|
|
ricecrackers
|
|
Group: Banned Members
Posts: 3.5K,
Visits: 0
|
this is the only account I've ever had on this forum
what proof do you have otherwise?
my name is not Andrew. do you really think I'd draw attention to myself by posting my own blog considering all the personal threats that have been leveled at me here?
|
|
|
|
|
switters
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 5.6K,
Visits: 0
|
ricecrackers wrote:this is the only account I've ever had on this forum
what proof do you have otherwise?
my name is not Andrew. do you really think I'd draw attention to myself by posting my own blog considering all the personal threats that have been leveled at me here? lol what personal threats?
|
|
|
|
ricecrackers
|
|
Group: Banned Members
Posts: 3.5K,
Visits: 0
|
switters wrote:ricecrackers wrote:this is the only account I've ever had on this forum
what proof do you have otherwise?
my name is not Andrew. do you really think I'd draw attention to myself by posting my own blog considering all the personal threats that have been leveled at me here? lol what personal threats? you dont see the posts that get removed by the mods what proof will it take for you to believe that we are two different people with no prior association?
|
|
|
|
|
Glenn - A-league Mad
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 5.2K,
Visits: 0
|
ricecrackers wrote:this is the only account I've ever had on this forum
what proof do you have otherwise?
my name is not Andrew. do you really think I'd draw attention to myself by posting my own blog considering all the personal threats that have been leveled at me here? Like I laid out in my post. Its all a bit of fun, but there are some really oddly timed events and the "proof" was a very funny moment to me.
|
|
|
|
ricecrackers
|
|
Group: Banned Members
Posts: 3.5K,
Visits: 0
|
Glenn - A-league Mad wrote:ricecrackers wrote:this is the only account I've ever had on this forum
what proof do you have otherwise?
my name is not Andrew. do you really think I'd draw attention to myself by posting my own blog considering all the personal threats that have been leveled at me here? Like I laid out in my post. Its all a bit of fun, but there are some really oddly timed events and the "proof" was a very funny moment to me. what proof will it take for you to be convinced that we are two different people with no prior association?
|
|
|
|
|
mcjules
|
|
Group: Moderators
Posts: 8.4K,
Visits: 0
|
What if I told you everyone that has posted in this thread is ricecrackers?
Insert Gertjan Verbeek gifs here
|
|
|
|
Poptech
|
|
Group: Banned Members
Posts: 27,
Visits: 0
|
From a few pages back... Draupnir wrote:The second article on the front page of this bastion of scientific genius is entitled GoPro Epic Videos and was posted 6 months ago. Why would a popular technology website not write about popular technology? Draupnir wrote:And if that wasn't enough, the latest post IS ABSOLUTELY NOT, IN ANY WAY revisionist history with the title of Correcting History: Dyson and Einstein. Strawman argument, no claim was made that it was "revisionist" history. Draupnir wrote:...just head on over the the forums where the guy that writes the high quality articles for the website has defined his role as "Chief of Staff" Just like you have defined yourself as a "Legend" here? Draupnir wrote:...and posts topics ranging from Obama plan's to cut back pilot firearm training , Tamerlan Tsarnaev got Mass. welfare benefits Those were actual news stories. Did you just read the forum topic title and fail to actually check? How embarrassing. Obama administration's plan to cut back pilot firearm training raises security concerns ( Fox News, March 23, 2012) Tamerlan Tsarnaev got Mass. welfare benefits ( Boston Herald, April 24, 2013) Draupnir wrote:...and posts insightful comments such as What? All I hear is Bush Lied Saddam did not have any WMDs. BULLSHIT! He flat out did. They said Saddam had gotten rid of all of them. Yeah he dispersed them around the country and mixed them in with other munitions. This has been confirmed by multiple sources: National Ground Intelligence Center Report: Iraqi Chemical Munitions (PDF) ( NGIC, June 21, 2006) Quote:- Since 2003 Coalition forces have recovered approximately 500 weapons munitions which contain degraded mustard or sarin nerve agent.
- Despite many efforts to locate and destroy Iraq’s pre-Gulf War chemical munitions, filled and unfilled pre-Gulf War chemical munitions are assessed to still exist.
- Pre-Gulf War Iraqi chemical weapons could be sold on the black market. Use of these weapons by terrorists or insurgent groups would have implications for Coalition forces in Iraq. The possibility of use outside Iraq cannot be ruled out.
- The most likely munitions remaining are sarin and mustard-filled projectiles.
- The purity of the agent inside the munitions depends on many factors, including the manufacturing process, potential additives, and environmental storage conditions. While agents degrade over time, chemical warfare agents remain hazardous and potentially lethal.
- It has been reported in open press that insurgents and Iraqi groups desire to acquire and use chemical weapons. Report: Hundreds of WMDs Found in Iraq ( Fox News, June 22, 2006) Munitions Found in Iraq Meet WMD Criteria, Official Says ( U.S. Department of Defense, June 29, 2006) The Secret Casualties of Iraq’s Abandoned Chemical Weapons ( New York Times, October 14, 2014) Draupnir wrote:Not to mention you have a high ranking Iraqi Air Force General coming out and saying they air lifted them to Syria on the Iraq war. How ironic, so you confess to not actually watching the admitted socialist comedian you so desperately tried to defend? "WMDs were moved to Syria" - Iraqi General Georges Sada (Video) ( Fox News, January 26, 2006)
|
|
|
|
Poptech
|
|
Group: Banned Members
Posts: 27,
Visits: 0
|
Glenn - A-league Mad wrote:You do see how this is looking? :lol: :lol: :lol: I am not a conspiracy theorist so no I don't. Technically it is impossible to know who anyone is on the Internet.
|
|
|
|
ricecrackers
|
|
Group: Banned Members
Posts: 3.5K,
Visits: 0
|
I wouldnt get waylaid by unrelated topics such as John Stewart and WMDs.
That draupkick is resorting to these is clear deflection from the topic at hand: man made climate change alarmism.
|
|
|
|
|
Muz
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 15K,
Visits: 0
|
mcjules wrote:What if I told you everyone that has posted in this thread is ricecrackers? Brilliant.
Member since 2008.
|
|
|
|
|
BETHFC
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 8.2K,
Visits: 0
|
ricecrackers wrote:I wouldnt get waylaid by unrelated topics such as John Stewart and WMDs.
That draupkick is resorting to these is clear deflection from the topic at hand: man made climate change alarmism. Do you deny any magnitude of anthropogenic climate change?
|
|
|
|
Poptech
|
|
Group: Banned Members
Posts: 27,
Visits: 0
|
ricecrackers wrote:I wouldnt get waylaid by unrelated topics such as John Stewart and WMDs. Reporting on news stories and having discussions for no reason like that are two different things, which needed to be made clear. The Job Stewart discussion is important since many on the alarmist side get their news from the comedian.
|
|
|
|
ricecrackers
|
|
Group: Banned Members
Posts: 3.5K,
Visits: 0
|
benelsmore wrote:ricecrackers wrote:I wouldnt get waylaid by unrelated topics such as John Stewart and WMDs.
That draupkick is resorting to these is clear deflection from the topic at hand: man made climate change alarmism. Do you deny any magnitude of anthropogenic climate change? I couldn't possibly answer that question with absolutism because any undetectable or immeasurable minuscule amount would fall into the span of magnitude. My belief is there is no evidence that carbon dioxide emissions from human activity have any significant or observed effect on the climate. Even if it did, it would be no cause for alarmism as a warmer planet results in a more stable climate and greater capacity for life support. Unlike most on this forum who were trained to believe in absolutism on this issue from an early age and have never changed their stance in their life times, I was one who initially believed the hype more than a decade ago as I had no reason not to. I then changed that position as I learned more about it over a number of years. Any real scientist (and I dont claim to be one) would consider the opposing argument to an unproven theory before making a conclusion on it.
|
|
|
|
|
BETHFC
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 8.2K,
Visits: 0
|
ricecrackers wrote:benelsmore wrote:ricecrackers wrote:I wouldnt get waylaid by unrelated topics such as John Stewart and WMDs.
That draupkick is resorting to these is clear deflection from the topic at hand: man made climate change alarmism. Do you deny any magnitude of anthropogenic climate change? I couldn't possibly answer that question with absolutism because any undetectable or immeasurable minuscule amount would fall into the span of magnitude. My belief is there is no evidence that carbon dioxide emissions from human activity have any significant or observed effect on the climate. Even if it did, it would be no cause for alarmism as a warmer planet results in a more stable climate and greater capacity for life support. Unlike most on this forum who were trained to believe in absolutism on this issue from an early age and have never changed their stance in their life times, I was one who initially believed the hype more than a decade ago as I had no reason not to. I then changed that position as I learned more about it over a number of years. Any real scientist (and I dont claim to be one) would consider the opposing argument to an unproven theory before making a conclusion on it. I agree entirely. Using magnitude was a poor choice of words. It was a suggestion that we may be affecting the climate at a much less significant magnitude than people will have us believe. Edited by benelsmore: 1/7/2015 04:37:42 PM
|
|
|
|
ricecrackers
|
|
Group: Banned Members
Posts: 3.5K,
Visits: 0
|
Poptech, are you in the UK?
|
|
|
|
Poptech
|
|
Group: Banned Members
Posts: 27,
Visits: 0
|
ricecrackers wrote:Poptech, are you in the UK? No the U.S.
|
|
|
|
|
paulbagzFC
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 44K,
Visits: 0
|
Poptech wrote:paulbagzFC wrote:Poptech wrote:paulbagzFC wrote:Is this not the exact thing ricey would have a crack about, people talking about shit that isn't even their field? So are journalists or a curator of a resource not allowed to compile or discuss the things they compiled? According to your boy ricecrackers; no. Don't deflect, I asked you. What degree to you have in climate change or related science? -PB
|
|
|
|
Poptech
|
|
Group: Banned Members
Posts: 27,
Visits: 0
|
paulbagzFC wrote:What degree to you have in climate change or related science? Please stop deflecting and answer the question: So are journalists or a curator of a resource not allowed to compile information or discuss the things they compiled?
|
|
|
|
|
BETHFC
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 8.2K,
Visits: 0
|
Poptech wrote:paulbagzFC wrote:What degree to you have in climate change or related science? Please stop deflecting and answer the question: So are journalists or a curator of a resource not allowed to compile information or discuss the things they compiled? Anyone can copy and paste. But do you understand what you're copying and pasting?
|
|
|
|
|
paulbagzFC
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 44K,
Visits: 0
|
Poptech wrote:paulbagzFC wrote:What degree to you have in climate change or related science? Please stop deflecting and answer the question: So are journalists or a curator of a resource not allowed to compile information or discuss the things they compiled? No they are not allowed to, not without a University degree. -PB
|
|
|
|
Poptech
|
|
Group: Banned Members
Posts: 27,
Visits: 0
|
paulbagzFC wrote:Poptech wrote:paulbagzFC wrote:What degree to you have in climate change or related science? Please stop deflecting and answer the question: So are journalists or a curator of a resource not allowed to compile information or discuss the things they compiled? No they are not allowed to, not without a University degree. Please cite and quote this universal law.
|
|
|
|
|
paladisious
|
|
Group: Moderators
Posts: 39K,
Visits: 0
|
Poptech wrote:paulbagzFC wrote:Poptech wrote:paulbagzFC wrote:What degree to you have in climate change or related science? Please stop deflecting and answer the question: So are journalists or a curator of a resource not allowed to compile information or discuss the things they compiled? No they are not allowed to, not without a University degree. Please cite and quote this universal law. Hey Ricey.
|
|
|
|
|
paulbagzFC
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 44K,
Visits: 0
|
Poptech wrote:paulbagzFC wrote:Poptech wrote:paulbagzFC wrote:What degree to you have in climate change or related science? Please stop deflecting and answer the question: So are journalists or a curator of a resource not allowed to compile information or discuss the things they compiled? No they are not allowed to, not without a University degree. Please cite and quote this universal law. Google Australia's Law on provisioning opinions. -PB
|
|
|
|
|
BETHFC
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 8.2K,
Visits: 0
|
paladisious wrote:Poptech wrote:paulbagzFC wrote:Poptech wrote:paulbagzFC wrote:What degree to you have in climate change or related science? Please stop deflecting and answer the question: So are journalists or a curator of a resource not allowed to compile information or discuss the things they compiled? No they are not allowed to, not without a University degree. Please cite and quote this universal law. Hey Ricey. Awkward........8-[
|
|
|
|
Poptech
|
|
Group: Banned Members
Posts: 27,
Visits: 0
|
paulbagzFC wrote:Poptech wrote:paulbagzFC wrote:Poptech wrote:paulbagzFC wrote:What degree to you have in climate change or related science? Please stop deflecting and answer the question: So are journalists or a curator of a resource not allowed to compile information or discuss the things they compiled? No they are not allowed to, not without a University degree. Please cite and quote this universal law. Google Australia's Law on provisioning opinions So you have nothing, thanks for confirming that.
|
|
|
|
ricecrackers
|
|
Group: Banned Members
Posts: 3.5K,
Visits: 0
|
benelsmore wrote:paladisious wrote:Poptech wrote:paulbagzFC wrote:Poptech wrote:paulbagzFC wrote:What degree to you have in climate change or related science? Please stop deflecting and answer the question: So are journalists or a curator of a resource not allowed to compile information or discuss the things they compiled? No they are not allowed to, not without a University degree. Please cite and quote this universal law. Hey Ricey. Awkward........8-[ how so? the corrupt mod who has banned me for no reason in the past has also lied about multis in the past
|
|
|
|
|
paulbagzFC
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 44K,
Visits: 0
|
So, this dude, based in the US, is posting about climate change @ 3am (US time) on an Australia Soccer forum?  -PB
|
|
|
|
Poptech
|
|
Group: Banned Members
Posts: 27,
Visits: 0
|
paulbagzFC wrote:So, this dude, based in the US, is posting about climate change @ 3am (US time) on an Australia Soccer forum? You did the sophomoric image posting already and the U.S. has more than one timezone.
|
|
|
|