Slander


Slander

Author
Message
humbert
humbert
Semi-Pro
Semi-Pro (1.7K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.7K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.7K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.7K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.7K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.7K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.7K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.7K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.7K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.7K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.7K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 1.6K, Visits: 0
I have been openly slandered by a poster on this forum who has imputed to me opinions which are demonstrably untrue.

Apply the forum rules.
notorganic
notorganic
Legend
Legend (21K reputation)Legend (21K reputation)Legend (21K reputation)Legend (21K reputation)Legend (21K reputation)Legend (21K reputation)Legend (21K reputation)Legend (21K reputation)Legend (21K reputation)Legend (21K reputation)Legend (21K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 21K, Visits: 0
humbert wrote:
I have been openly slandered by a poster on this forum who has imputed to me opinions which are demonstrably untrue.

Apply the forum rules.


lolz.
humbert
humbert
Semi-Pro
Semi-Pro (1.7K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.7K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.7K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.7K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.7K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.7K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.7K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.7K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.7K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.7K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.7K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 1.6K, Visits: 0
notorganic wrote:
humbert wrote:
I have been openly slandered by a poster on this forum who has imputed to me opinions which are demonstrably untrue.

Apply the forum rules.


lolz.


Why the lolz?
notorganic
notorganic
Legend
Legend (21K reputation)Legend (21K reputation)Legend (21K reputation)Legend (21K reputation)Legend (21K reputation)Legend (21K reputation)Legend (21K reputation)Legend (21K reputation)Legend (21K reputation)Legend (21K reputation)Legend (21K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 21K, Visits: 0
humbert wrote:
notorganic wrote:
humbert wrote:
I have been openly slandered by a poster on this forum who has imputed to me opinions which are demonstrably untrue.

Apply the forum rules.


lolz.


Why the lolz?


Because you're either a funny dude, or a dude worth laughing at.
australiantibullus
australiantibullus
Pro
Pro (2.3K reputation)Pro (2.3K reputation)Pro (2.3K reputation)Pro (2.3K reputation)Pro (2.3K reputation)Pro (2.3K reputation)Pro (2.3K reputation)Pro (2.3K reputation)Pro (2.3K reputation)Pro (2.3K reputation)Pro (2.3K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 2.3K, Visits: 0
Personally, I think Humbert has a right to be offended. Ifthat sig I saw is anything to go by, although it is now removed. Best to let it go

Edited by australiantibullus: 10/10/2014 10:36:05 PM
notorganic
notorganic
Legend
Legend (21K reputation)Legend (21K reputation)Legend (21K reputation)Legend (21K reputation)Legend (21K reputation)Legend (21K reputation)Legend (21K reputation)Legend (21K reputation)Legend (21K reputation)Legend (21K reputation)Legend (21K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 21K, Visits: 0
australiantibullus wrote:
Personally, I think Humbert has a right to be offended. (If that sig I saw is anything to go by)

He probably does, but it's hard to feel anything but amusement towards someone that strawmans and circlejerks on slander crying about being slandered.
australiantibullus
australiantibullus
Pro
Pro (2.3K reputation)Pro (2.3K reputation)Pro (2.3K reputation)Pro (2.3K reputation)Pro (2.3K reputation)Pro (2.3K reputation)Pro (2.3K reputation)Pro (2.3K reputation)Pro (2.3K reputation)Pro (2.3K reputation)Pro (2.3K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 2.3K, Visits: 0
notorganic wrote:
australiantibullus wrote:
Personally, I think Humbert has a right to be offended. (If that sig I saw is anything to go by)

He probably does, but it's hard to feel anything but amusement towards someone that strawmans and circlejerks on slander crying about being slandered.
yeah, irony was not lost
humbert
humbert
Semi-Pro
Semi-Pro (1.7K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.7K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.7K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.7K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.7K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.7K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.7K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.7K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.7K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.7K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.7K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 1.6K, Visits: 0
notorganic wrote:
australiantibullus wrote:
Personally, I think Humbert has a right to be offended. (If that sig I saw is anything to go by)

He probably does, but it's hard to feel anything but amusement towards someone that strawmans and circlejerks on slander crying about being slandered.


Strawman? If you repeat it enough someone might believe you.
jlm8695
jlm8695
Legend
Legend (19K reputation)Legend (19K reputation)Legend (19K reputation)Legend (19K reputation)Legend (19K reputation)Legend (19K reputation)Legend (19K reputation)Legend (19K reputation)Legend (19K reputation)Legend (19K reputation)Legend (19K reputation)

Group: Banned Members
Posts: 19K, Visits: 0
What happened? Did I miss some #controversy?
notorganic
notorganic
Legend
Legend (21K reputation)Legend (21K reputation)Legend (21K reputation)Legend (21K reputation)Legend (21K reputation)Legend (21K reputation)Legend (21K reputation)Legend (21K reputation)Legend (21K reputation)Legend (21K reputation)Legend (21K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 21K, Visits: 0
jlm8695 wrote:
What happened? Did I miss some #controversy?


Humbert called someone a self hating Arab, who retaliated by putting something quite nasty in his sig that has now been removed.
humbert
humbert
Semi-Pro
Semi-Pro (1.7K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.7K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.7K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.7K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.7K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.7K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.7K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.7K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.7K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.7K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.7K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 1.6K, Visits: 0
The same dickhead who once said "most arabs are scum"
notorganic
notorganic
Legend
Legend (21K reputation)Legend (21K reputation)Legend (21K reputation)Legend (21K reputation)Legend (21K reputation)Legend (21K reputation)Legend (21K reputation)Legend (21K reputation)Legend (21K reputation)Legend (21K reputation)Legend (21K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 21K, Visits: 0
humbert wrote:
The same dickhead who once said "most arabs are scum"

Right, so you can justify giving someone a serve, but cry foul when it gets returned.

Cry more mate.
humbert
humbert
Semi-Pro
Semi-Pro (1.7K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.7K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.7K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.7K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.7K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.7K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.7K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.7K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.7K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.7K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.7K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 1.6K, Visits: 0
notorganic wrote:
humbert wrote:
The same dickhead who once said "most arabs are scum"

Right, so you can justify giving someone a serve, but cry foul when it gets returned.

Cry more mate.


I told him what he is. He called me something which is defamatory and false . Tell the difference?
notorganic
notorganic
Legend
Legend (21K reputation)Legend (21K reputation)Legend (21K reputation)Legend (21K reputation)Legend (21K reputation)Legend (21K reputation)Legend (21K reputation)Legend (21K reputation)Legend (21K reputation)Legend (21K reputation)Legend (21K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 21K, Visits: 0
humbert wrote:
notorganic wrote:
humbert wrote:
The same dickhead who once said "most arabs are scum"

Right, so you can justify giving someone a serve, but cry foul when it gets returned.

Cry more mate.


I told him what he is. He called me something which is defamatory and false . Tell the difference?

The difference is that you're crying about his character attack, where he is not crying about yours.
humbert
humbert
Semi-Pro
Semi-Pro (1.7K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.7K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.7K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.7K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.7K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.7K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.7K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.7K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.7K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.7K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.7K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 1.6K, Visits: 0
notorganic wrote:
humbert wrote:
notorganic wrote:
humbert wrote:
The same dickhead who once said "most arabs are scum"

Right, so you can justify giving someone a serve, but cry foul when it gets returned.

Cry more mate.


I told him what he is. He called me something which is defamatory and false . Tell the difference?

The difference is that you're crying about his character attack, where he is not crying about yours.


The truth is different from an untruth. Is this so hard for you to accept?
paulbagzFC
paulbagzFC
Legend
Legend (45K reputation)Legend (45K reputation)Legend (45K reputation)Legend (45K reputation)Legend (45K reputation)Legend (45K reputation)Legend (45K reputation)Legend (45K reputation)Legend (45K reputation)Legend (45K reputation)Legend (45K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 44K, Visits: 0
Oh so Crusader provided the burn?

Werd.

-PB

https://i.imgur.com/batge7K.jpg

roarys mane
roarys mane
Pro
Pro (3.8K reputation)Pro (3.8K reputation)Pro (3.8K reputation)Pro (3.8K reputation)Pro (3.8K reputation)Pro (3.8K reputation)Pro (3.8K reputation)Pro (3.8K reputation)Pro (3.8K reputation)Pro (3.8K reputation)Pro (3.8K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 3.7K, Visits: 0
humbert wrote:
notorganic wrote:
humbert wrote:
notorganic wrote:
humbert wrote:
The same dickhead who once said "most arabs are scum"

Right, so you can justify giving someone a serve, but cry foul when it gets returned.

Cry more mate.


I told him what he is. He called me something which is defamatory and false . Tell the difference?

The difference is that you're crying about his character attack, where he is not crying about yours.


The truth is different from an untruth. Is this so hard for you to accept?


hook up.
Joffa
Joffa
Legend
Legend (86K reputation)Legend (86K reputation)Legend (86K reputation)Legend (86K reputation)Legend (86K reputation)Legend (86K reputation)Legend (86K reputation)Legend (86K reputation)Legend (86K reputation)Legend (86K reputation)Legend (86K reputation)

Group: Moderators
Posts: 66K, Visits: 0
In order for it to be considered slander, you would have to prove the comment false , has anyone yet seen any evidence for or against said commentary?
u4486662
u4486662
World Class
World Class (8.8K reputation)World Class (8.8K reputation)World Class (8.8K reputation)World Class (8.8K reputation)World Class (8.8K reputation)World Class (8.8K reputation)World Class (8.8K reputation)World Class (8.8K reputation)World Class (8.8K reputation)World Class (8.8K reputation)World Class (8.8K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 8.8K, Visits: 0
notorganic wrote:
jlm8695 wrote:
What happened? Did I miss some #controversy?


Humbert called someone a self hating Arab, who retaliated by putting something quite nasty in his sig that has now been removed.

What was in the sig?
notatroll
notatroll
Semi-Pro
Semi-Pro (1.1K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.1K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.1K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.1K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.1K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.1K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.1K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.1K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.1K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.1K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.1K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 1K, Visits: 0
Joffa wrote:
In order for it to be considered slander, you would have to prove the comment false , has anyone yet seen any evidence for or against said commentary?


The FFT Court of Law is now in session. Barrister Joffa will be hearing the proceedings. All Rise for the Honorable Joffa.

Joffa will take opening statements from now.
paulbagzFC
paulbagzFC
Legend
Legend (45K reputation)Legend (45K reputation)Legend (45K reputation)Legend (45K reputation)Legend (45K reputation)Legend (45K reputation)Legend (45K reputation)Legend (45K reputation)Legend (45K reputation)Legend (45K reputation)Legend (45K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 44K, Visits: 0
Joffa wrote:
In order for it to be considered slander, you would have to prove the comment false , has anyone yet seen any evidence for or against said commentary?


Gotta know what was said first ;)

-PB

https://i.imgur.com/batge7K.jpg

u4486662
u4486662
World Class
World Class (8.8K reputation)World Class (8.8K reputation)World Class (8.8K reputation)World Class (8.8K reputation)World Class (8.8K reputation)World Class (8.8K reputation)World Class (8.8K reputation)World Class (8.8K reputation)World Class (8.8K reputation)World Class (8.8K reputation)World Class (8.8K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 8.8K, Visits: 0
notatroll wrote:
Joffa wrote:
In order for it to be considered slander, you would have to prove the comment false , has anyone yet seen any evidence for or against said commentary?


The FFT Court of Law is now in session. Barrister Joffa will be hearing the proceedings. All Rise for the Honorable Joffa.

Joffa will take opening statements from now.

I move that crusader called humbert a twizzledick.

We all saw it.

The prosecution rests.
Joffa
Joffa
Legend
Legend (86K reputation)Legend (86K reputation)Legend (86K reputation)Legend (86K reputation)Legend (86K reputation)Legend (86K reputation)Legend (86K reputation)Legend (86K reputation)Legend (86K reputation)Legend (86K reputation)Legend (86K reputation)

Group: Moderators
Posts: 66K, Visits: 0
paulbagzFC wrote:
Joffa wrote:
In order for it to be considered slander, you would have to prove the comment false , has anyone yet seen any evidence for or against said commentary?


Gotta know what was said first ;)

-PB


I know what was said, the sook(sorry the plaintiff) ..........
notatroll
notatroll
Semi-Pro
Semi-Pro (1.1K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.1K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.1K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.1K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.1K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.1K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.1K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.1K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.1K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.1K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.1K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 1K, Visits: 0
u4486662 wrote:
notatroll wrote:
Joffa wrote:
In order for it to be considered slander, you would have to prove the comment false , has anyone yet seen any evidence for or against said commentary?


The FFT Court of Law is now in session. Barrister Joffa will be hearing the proceedings. All Rise for the Honorable Joffa.

Joffa will take opening statements from now.

I move that crusader called humbert a twizzledick.

We all saw it.

The prosecution rests.


Any statements from the defendant? The Prosecution has a very strong argument here.
TheSelectFew
TheSelectFew
Legend
Legend (30K reputation)Legend (30K reputation)Legend (30K reputation)Legend (30K reputation)Legend (30K reputation)Legend (30K reputation)Legend (30K reputation)Legend (30K reputation)Legend (30K reputation)Legend (30K reputation)Legend (30K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 30K, Visits: 0
I've been slandered to often on here! Apply the rules JoFFA!!


humbert
humbert
Semi-Pro
Semi-Pro (1.7K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.7K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.7K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.7K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.7K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.7K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.7K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.7K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.7K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.7K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.7K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 1.6K, Visits: 0
Joffa wrote:
In order for it to be considered slander, you would have to prove the comment false , has anyone yet seen any evidence for or against said commentary?


Rofl. The defence has to prove nothing you clown.
notorganic
notorganic
Legend
Legend (21K reputation)Legend (21K reputation)Legend (21K reputation)Legend (21K reputation)Legend (21K reputation)Legend (21K reputation)Legend (21K reputation)Legend (21K reputation)Legend (21K reputation)Legend (21K reputation)Legend (21K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 21K, Visits: 0
humbert wrote:
Joffa wrote:
In order for it to be considered slander, you would have to prove the comment false , has anyone yet seen any evidence for or against said commentary?


Rofl. The defence has to prove nothing you clown.


Exactly, the onus is entirely on the shoulders of Endor.
Glory Recruit
Glory Recruit
Legend
Legend (14K reputation)Legend (14K reputation)Legend (14K reputation)Legend (14K reputation)Legend (14K reputation)Legend (14K reputation)Legend (14K reputation)Legend (14K reputation)Legend (14K reputation)Legend (14K reputation)Legend (14K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 13K, Visits: 0
*rubs my nips in the courtroom*


humbert
humbert
Semi-Pro
Semi-Pro (1.7K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.7K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.7K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.7K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.7K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.7K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.7K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.7K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.7K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.7K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.7K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 1.6K, Visits: 0
notorganic wrote:
humbert wrote:
Joffa wrote:
In order for it to be considered slander, you would have to prove the comment false , has anyone yet seen any evidence for or against said commentary?


Rofl. The defence has to prove nothing you clown.


Exactly, the onus is entirely on the shoulders of Endor.


:roll:
ricecrackers
ricecrackers
Pro
Pro (3.5K reputation)Pro (3.5K reputation)Pro (3.5K reputation)Pro (3.5K reputation)Pro (3.5K reputation)Pro (3.5K reputation)Pro (3.5K reputation)Pro (3.5K reputation)Pro (3.5K reputation)Pro (3.5K reputation)Pro (3.5K reputation)

Group: Banned Members
Posts: 3.5K, Visits: 0
everyone is racist
some are just in denial about it, so not slander

GO


Select a Forum....























Inside Sport


Search