humbert
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 1.6K,
Visits: 0
|
I have been openly slandered by a poster on this forum who has imputed to me opinions which are demonstrably untrue.
Apply the forum rules.
|
|
|
|
notorganic
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 21K,
Visits: 0
|
humbert wrote:I have been openly slandered by a poster on this forum who has imputed to me opinions which are demonstrably untrue.
Apply the forum rules. lolz.
|
|
|
humbert
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 1.6K,
Visits: 0
|
notorganic wrote:humbert wrote:I have been openly slandered by a poster on this forum who has imputed to me opinions which are demonstrably untrue.
Apply the forum rules. lolz. Why the lolz?
|
|
|
notorganic
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 21K,
Visits: 0
|
humbert wrote:notorganic wrote:humbert wrote:I have been openly slandered by a poster on this forum who has imputed to me opinions which are demonstrably untrue.
Apply the forum rules. lolz. Why the lolz? Because you're either a funny dude, or a dude worth laughing at.
|
|
|
australiantibullus
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 2.3K,
Visits: 0
|
Personally, I think Humbert has a right to be offended. Ifthat sig I saw is anything to go by, although it is now removed. Best to let it go
Edited by australiantibullus: 10/10/2014 10:36:05 PM
|
|
|
notorganic
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 21K,
Visits: 0
|
australiantibullus wrote:Personally, I think Humbert has a right to be offended. (If that sig I saw is anything to go by) He probably does, but it's hard to feel anything but amusement towards someone that strawmans and circlejerks on slander crying about being slandered.
|
|
|
australiantibullus
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 2.3K,
Visits: 0
|
notorganic wrote:australiantibullus wrote:Personally, I think Humbert has a right to be offended. (If that sig I saw is anything to go by) He probably does, but it's hard to feel anything but amusement towards someone that strawmans and circlejerks on slander crying about being slandered. yeah, irony was not lost
|
|
|
humbert
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 1.6K,
Visits: 0
|
notorganic wrote:australiantibullus wrote:Personally, I think Humbert has a right to be offended. (If that sig I saw is anything to go by) He probably does, but it's hard to feel anything but amusement towards someone that strawmans and circlejerks on slander crying about being slandered. Strawman? If you repeat it enough someone might believe you.
|
|
|
jlm8695
|
|
Group: Banned Members
Posts: 19K,
Visits: 0
|
What happened? Did I miss some #controversy?
|
|
|
notorganic
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 21K,
Visits: 0
|
jlm8695 wrote:What happened? Did I miss some #controversy? Humbert called someone a self hating Arab, who retaliated by putting something quite nasty in his sig that has now been removed.
|
|
|
humbert
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 1.6K,
Visits: 0
|
The same dickhead who once said "most arabs are scum"
|
|
|
notorganic
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 21K,
Visits: 0
|
humbert wrote:The same dickhead who once said "most arabs are scum" Right, so you can justify giving someone a serve, but cry foul when it gets returned. Cry more mate.
|
|
|
humbert
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 1.6K,
Visits: 0
|
notorganic wrote:humbert wrote:The same dickhead who once said "most arabs are scum" Right, so you can justify giving someone a serve, but cry foul when it gets returned. Cry more mate. I told him what he is. He called me something which is defamatory and false . Tell the difference?
|
|
|
notorganic
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 21K,
Visits: 0
|
humbert wrote:notorganic wrote:humbert wrote:The same dickhead who once said "most arabs are scum" Right, so you can justify giving someone a serve, but cry foul when it gets returned. Cry more mate. I told him what he is. He called me something which is defamatory and false . Tell the difference? The difference is that you're crying about his character attack, where he is not crying about yours.
|
|
|
humbert
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 1.6K,
Visits: 0
|
notorganic wrote:humbert wrote:notorganic wrote:humbert wrote:The same dickhead who once said "most arabs are scum" Right, so you can justify giving someone a serve, but cry foul when it gets returned. Cry more mate. I told him what he is. He called me something which is defamatory and false . Tell the difference? The difference is that you're crying about his character attack, where he is not crying about yours. The truth is different from an untruth. Is this so hard for you to accept?
|
|
|
paulbagzFC
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 44K,
Visits: 0
|
Oh so Crusader provided the burn? Werd. -PB
|
|
|
roarys mane
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 3.7K,
Visits: 0
|
humbert wrote:notorganic wrote:humbert wrote:notorganic wrote:humbert wrote:The same dickhead who once said "most arabs are scum" Right, so you can justify giving someone a serve, but cry foul when it gets returned. Cry more mate. I told him what he is. He called me something which is defamatory and false . Tell the difference? The difference is that you're crying about his character attack, where he is not crying about yours. The truth is different from an untruth. Is this so hard for you to accept? hook up.
|
|
|
Joffa
|
|
Group: Moderators
Posts: 66K,
Visits: 0
|
In order for it to be considered slander, you would have to prove the comment false , has anyone yet seen any evidence for or against said commentary?
|
|
|
u4486662
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 8.8K,
Visits: 0
|
notorganic wrote:jlm8695 wrote:What happened? Did I miss some #controversy? Humbert called someone a self hating Arab, who retaliated by putting something quite nasty in his sig that has now been removed. What was in the sig?
|
|
|
notatroll
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 1K,
Visits: 0
|
Joffa wrote:In order for it to be considered slander, you would have to prove the comment false , has anyone yet seen any evidence for or against said commentary? The FFT Court of Law is now in session. Barrister Joffa will be hearing the proceedings. All Rise for the Honorable Joffa. Joffa will take opening statements from now.
|
|
|
paulbagzFC
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 44K,
Visits: 0
|
Joffa wrote:In order for it to be considered slander, you would have to prove the comment false , has anyone yet seen any evidence for or against said commentary? Gotta know what was said first ;) -PB
|
|
|
u4486662
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 8.8K,
Visits: 0
|
notatroll wrote:Joffa wrote:In order for it to be considered slander, you would have to prove the comment false , has anyone yet seen any evidence for or against said commentary? The FFT Court of Law is now in session. Barrister Joffa will be hearing the proceedings. All Rise for the Honorable Joffa. Joffa will take opening statements from now. I move that crusader called humbert a twizzledick. We all saw it. The prosecution rests.
|
|
|
Joffa
|
|
Group: Moderators
Posts: 66K,
Visits: 0
|
paulbagzFC wrote:Joffa wrote:In order for it to be considered slander, you would have to prove the comment false , has anyone yet seen any evidence for or against said commentary? Gotta know what was said first ;) -PB I know what was said, the sook(sorry the plaintiff) ..........
|
|
|
notatroll
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 1K,
Visits: 0
|
u4486662 wrote:notatroll wrote:Joffa wrote:In order for it to be considered slander, you would have to prove the comment false , has anyone yet seen any evidence for or against said commentary? The FFT Court of Law is now in session. Barrister Joffa will be hearing the proceedings. All Rise for the Honorable Joffa. Joffa will take opening statements from now. I move that crusader called humbert a twizzledick. We all saw it. The prosecution rests. Any statements from the defendant? The Prosecution has a very strong argument here.
|
|
|
TheSelectFew
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 30K,
Visits: 0
|
I've been slandered to often on here! Apply the rules JoFFA!!
|
|
|
humbert
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 1.6K,
Visits: 0
|
Joffa wrote:In order for it to be considered slander, you would have to prove the comment false , has anyone yet seen any evidence for or against said commentary? Rofl. The defence has to prove nothing you clown.
|
|
|
notorganic
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 21K,
Visits: 0
|
humbert wrote:Joffa wrote:In order for it to be considered slander, you would have to prove the comment false , has anyone yet seen any evidence for or against said commentary? Rofl. The defence has to prove nothing you clown. Exactly, the onus is entirely on the shoulders of Endor.
|
|
|
Glory Recruit
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 13K,
Visits: 0
|
*rubs my nips in the courtroom*
|
|
|
humbert
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 1.6K,
Visits: 0
|
notorganic wrote:humbert wrote:Joffa wrote:In order for it to be considered slander, you would have to prove the comment false , has anyone yet seen any evidence for or against said commentary? Rofl. The defence has to prove nothing you clown. Exactly, the onus is entirely on the shoulders of Endor. :roll:
|
|
|
ricecrackers
|
|
Group: Banned Members
Posts: 3.5K,
Visits: 0
|
everyone is racist some are just in denial about it, so not slander
|
|
|