|
Decentric
|
|
Group: Awaiting Activation
Posts: 22K,
Visits: 0
|
Eastern Glory wrote:Yay!!!! The stifling of more opinions on a forum that already has its own football subculture where everyone agrees on 90% of things and bully those who disagree!!!!! Never thought of it like that. I've thought of it usually as approximately 25 percent for and against issues raised, with 50% sitting on the fence. What is that subculture, EG?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
aussie scott21
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 19K,
Visits: 0
|
"9GABmeme420" wrote:If we are not gonna ban them, can we at least have a roar article alert in the titles so we can avoid them? Can we do the same for anything written by Safro. Just put his name at the start of the title.
|
|
|
|
|
Eastern Glory
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 20K,
Visits: 0
|
Draupnir wrote:Eastern Glory wrote:Yay!!!! The stifling of more opinions on a forum that already has its own football subculture where everyone agrees on 90% of things and bully those who disagree!!!!! Don't worry m8, I'll help fellate Lucas Neill and Holger with you. Only if you grow your beard back. Then you bring someone to the table that I could never offer them :lol:
|
|
|
|
|
Slobodan Drauposevic
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 14K,
Visits: 0
|
Eastern Glory wrote:Yay!!!! The stifling of more opinions on a forum that already has its own football subculture where everyone agrees on 90% of things and bully those who disagree!!!!! Don't worry m8, I'll help fellate Lucas Neill and Holger with you.
|
|
|
|
|
macktheknife
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 16K,
Visits: 0
|
paulbagzFC wrote:Eastern Glory wrote:Yay!!!! The stifling of more opinions on a forum that already has its own football subculture where everyone agrees on 90% of things and bully those who disagree!!!!! Can't fuck wit dis clique brahhhh. -PB [youtube]RubBzkZzpUA[/youtube]
|
|
|
|
|
paulbagzFC
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 44K,
Visits: 0
|
Eastern Glory wrote:Yay!!!! The stifling of more opinions on a forum that already has its own football subculture where everyone agrees on 90% of things and bully those who disagree!!!!! Can't fuck wit dis clique brahhhh. -PB
|
|
|
|
|
Bowden
|
|
Group: Moderators
Posts: 16K,
Visits: 0
|
Eastern Glory wrote:Yay!!!! The stifling of more opinions on a forum that already has its own football subculture where everyone agrees on 90% of things and bully those who disagree!!!!! They are welcome to post their opinions to FFT.
|
|
|
|
|
Eastern Glory
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 20K,
Visits: 0
|
Yay!!!! The stifling of more opinions on a forum that already has its own football subculture where everyone agrees on 90% of things and bully those who disagree!!!!!
|
|
|
|
|
Bowden
|
|
Group: Moderators
Posts: 16K,
Visits: 0
|
paulbagzFC wrote:Kevin Airs wrote:I'm happy to ban the non-pro ones - the rest are just the equivalent of forum posts. Let them come in here and post their views. Is there any easy way to tell the difference? -PB The articles on their website are literally split into two columns - 'From the experts' and 'The Roar of the crowd', and are even colour-coded orange and blue respectively. http://www.theroar.com.au/category/soccer/
|
|
|
|
|
Bowden
|
|
Group: Moderators
Posts: 16K,
Visits: 0
|
Kevin Airs wrote:I'm happy to ban the non-pro ones - the rest are just the equivalent of forum posts. Let them come in here and post their views. It's official! Thanks, Kev! :D
|
|
|
|
|
paulbagzFC
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 44K,
Visits: 0
|
Kevin Airs wrote:I'm happy to ban the non-pro ones - the rest are just the equivalent of forum posts. Let them come in here and post their views. Is there any easy way to tell the difference? -PB
|
|
|
|
|
Kevin Airs
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 3.5K,
Visits: 0
|
I'm happy to ban the non-pro ones - the rest are just the equivalent of forum posts. Let them come in here and post their views.
|
|
|
|
|
Eastern Glory
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 20K,
Visits: 0
|
Bowden wrote:Agree - A ban on Roar articles as new threads unless they're "Pro" i.e. real journalist.
KA please approve thx. Is it necessary?! They're shit and all, but are we really that precious about it? Just a little 'Roar:' at the start is fine. Those who want to read it can, and the precious ones can remain precious?
|
|
|
|
|
Bowden
|
|
Group: Moderators
Posts: 16K,
Visits: 0
|
Agree - A ban on Roar articles as new threads unless they're "Pro" i.e. real journalist.
KA please approve thx.
|
|
|
|
|
mcjules
|
|
Group: Moderators
Posts: 8.4K,
Visits: 0
|
Machine wrote:+ 1 but I'm happy if it's only the amateur journo articles. The pro ones are fine. Yep orange roar only.
Insert Gertjan Verbeek gifs here
|
|
|
|
|
macktheknife
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 16K,
Visits: 0
|
Ban.
|
|
|
|
|
aussie scott21
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 19K,
Visits: 0
|
Its not so much roar articles, its the fact that they are given threads. They are just rants. It would also be very easy to find a thread that already exists and post it there eg. Brisbane expansion , should go in expansion thread.
|
|
|
|
|
Machine
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 2.4K,
Visits: 0
|
+ 1 but I'm happy if it's only the amateur journo articles. The pro ones are fine.
|
|
|
|
|
paulbagzFC
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 44K,
Visits: 0
|
"9GABmeme420" wrote:If we are not gonna ban them, can we at least have a roar article alert in the titles so we can avoid them? This. Save my poor virgin eyes from that filth. -PB
|
|
|
|
|
Jong Gabe
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 2.8K,
Visits: 0
|
If we are not gonna ban them, can we at least have a roar article alert in the titles so we can avoid them?
E
|
|
|
|