Banning Chris Brown would only distract from the fight against domestic violence


Banning Chris Brown would only distract from the fight against...

Author
Message
Scotch&Coke
Scotch&Coke
Semi-Pro
Semi-Pro (1.3K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.3K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.3K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.3K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.3K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.3K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.3K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.3K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.3K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.3K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.3K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 1.2K, Visits: 0
quickflick wrote:
Scotch&Coke wrote:
u4486662 wrote:
Scotch&Coke wrote:
trident wrote:
Scotch&Coke wrote:
trident wrote:
I'm pretty sure that advocating killing of doctors doest fall under freedom of speech
its more like terrorism and hence why he was denied a visa


That is the definition of freedom of speech. Obviously no sane person is going to advocate it, but it is his right in ours and his country to speak his mind


there are laws against making threats


From what i can gather he has said doctors SHOULD be killed for partaking in abortions. Not that he would personally hunt down and slaughter all those who oppose him

He said that abortion should be considered murder and in the US murder can carry the death penalty.


isnt that standard rhetoric for pro lifers though?


Of course not.

u4486662 is right. That you've said that demonstrates how far this debate has been derailed by both the right-wing Christian nutjobs who advocate the death penalty and don't believe in social welfare and by hardcore ultra feminists. In another thread it was asked what the non-religious arguments against abortion are. I was staggered.

Not to support the Catholic Church, but the Catholic Church's stance is pro-life and anti-death penalty. In saying that, plenty of Catholics deviate from these views.

And, of course, there are plenty of people who are not religious or politically conservative who oppose the right to abortion on ethical grounds.

Plenty of people who hold pro-life views don't believe in the death penalty full stop and don't believe that everybody who wants/approves of abortion wants to kill kids.

I'm not actually arguing one way or the other, simply pointing out that this is rather a complex issue and it's fairly emotional.


I meant in terms of people thinking abortion is murder, not the death penalty part. I should have clarified, my mistake
quickflick wrote:

"I disagree with everything you say but will defend, to the death, your right to say it"

-falsely attributed to Voltaire

but some of the greatest words ever uttered


This is essentially my whole point. We cannot start picking and choosing these things, it goes against everything freedom of speech and freedom of thinking is about.
StonerDavid
StonerDavid
Under 7s
Under 7s (4 reputation)Under 7s (4 reputation)Under 7s (4 reputation)Under 7s (4 reputation)Under 7s (4 reputation)Under 7s (4 reputation)Under 7s (4 reputation)Under 7s (4 reputation)Under 7s (4 reputation)Under 7s (4 reputation)Under 7s (4 reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 3, Visits: 0
Serves him right. Those 'stars' think they can get away with anything.
quickflick
quickflick
World Class
World Class (6.3K reputation)World Class (6.3K reputation)World Class (6.3K reputation)World Class (6.3K reputation)World Class (6.3K reputation)World Class (6.3K reputation)World Class (6.3K reputation)World Class (6.3K reputation)World Class (6.3K reputation)World Class (6.3K reputation)World Class (6.3K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 6.1K, Visits: 0
"I disagree with everything you say but will defend, to the death, your right to say it"

-falsely attributed to Voltaire

but some of the greatest words ever uttered
quickflick
quickflick
World Class
World Class (6.3K reputation)World Class (6.3K reputation)World Class (6.3K reputation)World Class (6.3K reputation)World Class (6.3K reputation)World Class (6.3K reputation)World Class (6.3K reputation)World Class (6.3K reputation)World Class (6.3K reputation)World Class (6.3K reputation)World Class (6.3K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 6.1K, Visits: 0
Scotch&Coke wrote:
u4486662 wrote:
Scotch&Coke wrote:
trident wrote:
Scotch&Coke wrote:
trident wrote:
I'm pretty sure that advocating killing of doctors doest fall under freedom of speech
its more like terrorism and hence why he was denied a visa


That is the definition of freedom of speech. Obviously no sane person is going to advocate it, but it is his right in ours and his country to speak his mind


there are laws against making threats


From what i can gather he has said doctors SHOULD be killed for partaking in abortions. Not that he would personally hunt down and slaughter all those who oppose him

He said that abortion should be considered murder and in the US murder can carry the death penalty.


isnt that standard rhetoric for pro lifers though?


Of course not.

u4486662 is right. That you've said that demonstrates how far this debate has been derailed by both the right-wing Christian nutjobs who advocate the death penalty and don't believe in social welfare and by hardcore ultra feminists. In another thread it was asked what the non-religious arguments against abortion are. I was staggered.

Not to support the Catholic Church, but the Catholic Church's stance is pro-life and anti-death penalty. In saying that, plenty of Catholics deviate from these views.

And, of course, there are plenty of people who are not religious or politically conservative who oppose the right to abortion on ethical grounds.

Plenty of people who hold pro-life views don't believe in the death penalty full stop and don't believe that everybody who wants/approves of abortion wants to kill kids.

I'm not actually arguing one way or the other, simply pointing out that this is rather a complex issue and it's fairly emotional.
trident
trident
Semi-Pro
Semi-Pro (1.3K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.3K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.3K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.3K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.3K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.3K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.3K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.3K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.3K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.3K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.3K reputation)

Group: Banned Members
Posts: 1.3K, Visits: 0
The ALP are supporting it so its bipartisan.
u4486662
u4486662
World Class
World Class (8.8K reputation)World Class (8.8K reputation)World Class (8.8K reputation)World Class (8.8K reputation)World Class (8.8K reputation)World Class (8.8K reputation)World Class (8.8K reputation)World Class (8.8K reputation)World Class (8.8K reputation)World Class (8.8K reputation)World Class (8.8K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 8.8K, Visits: 0
Scotch&Coke wrote:
u4486662 wrote:
Scotch&Coke wrote:
trident wrote:
Scotch&Coke wrote:
trident wrote:
I'm pretty sure that advocating killing of doctors doest fall under freedom of speech
its more like terrorism and hence why he was denied a visa


That is the definition of freedom of speech. Obviously no sane person is going to advocate it, but it is his right in ours and his country to speak his mind


there are laws against making threats


From what i can gather he has said doctors SHOULD be killed for partaking in abortions. Not that he would personally hunt down and slaughter all those who oppose him

He said that abortion should be considered murder and in the US murder can carry the death penalty.


isnt that standard rhetoric for pro lifers though?

The question you should be asking, is this comment so abhorrent that we should prevent someone from coming to the country?

The government is deciding what we are allowed to be subjected to. This is propaganda. This is authoritarianism.
Scotch&Coke
Scotch&Coke
Semi-Pro
Semi-Pro (1.3K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.3K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.3K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.3K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.3K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.3K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.3K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.3K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.3K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.3K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.3K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 1.2K, Visits: 0
u4486662 wrote:
Scotch&Coke wrote:
trident wrote:
Scotch&Coke wrote:
trident wrote:
I'm pretty sure that advocating killing of doctors doest fall under freedom of speech
its more like terrorism and hence why he was denied a visa


That is the definition of freedom of speech. Obviously no sane person is going to advocate it, but it is his right in ours and his country to speak his mind


there are laws against making threats


From what i can gather he has said doctors SHOULD be killed for partaking in abortions. Not that he would personally hunt down and slaughter all those who oppose him

He said that abortion should be considered murder and in the US murder can carry the death penalty.


isnt that standard rhetoric for pro lifers though?
u4486662
u4486662
World Class
World Class (8.8K reputation)World Class (8.8K reputation)World Class (8.8K reputation)World Class (8.8K reputation)World Class (8.8K reputation)World Class (8.8K reputation)World Class (8.8K reputation)World Class (8.8K reputation)World Class (8.8K reputation)World Class (8.8K reputation)World Class (8.8K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 8.8K, Visits: 0
trident wrote:
Quote:
Labor’s Senate leader, Penny Wong, backed Butler’s request for the visa to be cancelled. “Mr Newman’s public comments go well beyond what would be regarded as acceptable debate in this country,” Wong said. “His views are repugnant. Mr Newman’s presence in Australia risks inciting intimidation and violence against vulnerable women.

Penny Wong wouldn't know. She's not an expert.
trident
trident
Semi-Pro
Semi-Pro (1.3K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.3K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.3K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.3K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.3K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.3K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.3K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.3K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.3K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.3K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.3K reputation)

Group: Banned Members
Posts: 1.3K, Visits: 0
Quote:
Labor’s Senate leader, Penny Wong, backed Butler’s request for the visa to be cancelled. “Mr Newman’s public comments go well beyond what would be regarded as acceptable debate in this country,” Wong said. “His views are repugnant. Mr Newman’s presence in Australia risks inciting intimidation and violence against vulnerable women.

u4486662
u4486662
World Class
World Class (8.8K reputation)World Class (8.8K reputation)World Class (8.8K reputation)World Class (8.8K reputation)World Class (8.8K reputation)World Class (8.8K reputation)World Class (8.8K reputation)World Class (8.8K reputation)World Class (8.8K reputation)World Class (8.8K reputation)World Class (8.8K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 8.8K, Visits: 0
Scotch&Coke wrote:
trident wrote:
Scotch&Coke wrote:
trident wrote:
I'm pretty sure that advocating killing of doctors doest fall under freedom of speech
its more like terrorism and hence why he was denied a visa


That is the definition of freedom of speech. Obviously no sane person is going to advocate it, but it is his right in ours and his country to speak his mind


there are laws against making threats


From what i can gather he has said doctors SHOULD be killed for partaking in abortions. Not that he would personally hunt down and slaughter all those who oppose him

He said that abortion should be considered murder and in the US murder can carry the death penalty.
Kamaryn
Kamaryn
Pro
Pro (3.8K reputation)Pro (3.8K reputation)Pro (3.8K reputation)Pro (3.8K reputation)Pro (3.8K reputation)Pro (3.8K reputation)Pro (3.8K reputation)Pro (3.8K reputation)Pro (3.8K reputation)Pro (3.8K reputation)Pro (3.8K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 3.6K, Visits: 0
Scotch&Coke wrote:
trident wrote:
Scotch&Coke wrote:
trident wrote:
I'm pretty sure that advocating killing of doctors doest fall under freedom of speech
its more like terrorism and hence why he was denied a visa


That is the definition of freedom of speech. Obviously no sane person is going to advocate it, but it is his right in ours and his country to speak his mind


there are laws against making threats


From what i can gather he has said doctors SHOULD be killed for partaking in abortions. Not that he would personally hunt down and slaughter all those who oppose him


Exactly. In fact, he has explicitly said that those who oppose abortion should work within the system to change the legality of abortion, and that they shouldn't ever take the matter into their own hands.
Scotch&Coke
Scotch&Coke
Semi-Pro
Semi-Pro (1.3K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.3K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.3K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.3K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.3K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.3K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.3K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.3K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.3K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.3K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.3K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 1.2K, Visits: 0
trident wrote:
Scotch&Coke wrote:
trident wrote:
I'm pretty sure that advocating killing of doctors doest fall under freedom of speech
its more like terrorism and hence why he was denied a visa


That is the definition of freedom of speech. Obviously no sane person is going to advocate it, but it is his right in ours and his country to speak his mind


there are laws against making threats


From what i can gather he has said doctors SHOULD be killed for partaking in abortions. Not that he would personally hunt down and slaughter all those who oppose him
trident
trident
Semi-Pro
Semi-Pro (1.3K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.3K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.3K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.3K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.3K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.3K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.3K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.3K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.3K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.3K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.3K reputation)

Group: Banned Members
Posts: 1.3K, Visits: 0
Scotch&Coke wrote:
trident wrote:
I'm pretty sure that advocating killing of doctors doest fall under freedom of speech
its more like terrorism and hence why he was denied a visa


That is the definition of freedom of speech. Obviously no sane person is going to advocate it, but it is his right in ours and his country to speak his mind


there are laws against making threats
Scotch&Coke
Scotch&Coke
Semi-Pro
Semi-Pro (1.3K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.3K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.3K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.3K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.3K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.3K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.3K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.3K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.3K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.3K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.3K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 1.2K, Visits: 0
trident wrote:
I'm pretty sure that advocating killing of doctors doest fall under freedom of speech
its more like terrorism and hence why he was denied a visa


That is the definition of freedom of speech. Obviously no sane person is going to advocate it, but it is his right in ours and his country to speak his mind
trident
trident
Semi-Pro
Semi-Pro (1.3K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.3K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.3K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.3K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.3K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.3K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.3K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.3K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.3K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.3K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.3K reputation)

Group: Banned Members
Posts: 1.3K, Visits: 0
I'm pretty sure that advocating killing of doctors doest fall under freedom of speech
its more like terrorism and hence why he was denied a visa
Scotch&Coke
Scotch&Coke
Semi-Pro
Semi-Pro (1.3K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.3K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.3K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.3K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.3K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.3K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.3K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.3K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.3K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.3K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.3K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 1.2K, Visits: 0
quickflick wrote:
Why has this bloke been denied entry to Australia?

I disagree with this bloke. But he's entitled to his opinion and to express it.

Australia is becoming very authoritarian if it's refusing entry to so many of these people. Plain wrong.

"Character grounds"?


I agree completely. Freedom of speech is freedom of speech, you cant pick and choose who is allowed to speak although i would like this guy to fuck right off the face of the planet. Any free and unbiased thinker should be able to choose to accept or deny his opinions based on merit, not what popular opinion or the Government says. We are treading a very dangerous path with this and fear of the unknown and unwillingness to listen to others opinion is beginning to dictate things that should not be dictated.
u4486662
u4486662
World Class
World Class (8.8K reputation)World Class (8.8K reputation)World Class (8.8K reputation)World Class (8.8K reputation)World Class (8.8K reputation)World Class (8.8K reputation)World Class (8.8K reputation)World Class (8.8K reputation)World Class (8.8K reputation)World Class (8.8K reputation)World Class (8.8K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 8.8K, Visits: 0
I think a lot of you need to actually watch an abortion to see what actually happens.

We should do everything we can to prevent the need for an abortion in the first place and an abortion should be an absolute last resort. Being anti-abortion is not some crazy fundamentalist view despite the fact that the debate is often high-jacked by the religious right.
Kamaryn
Kamaryn
Pro
Pro (3.8K reputation)Pro (3.8K reputation)Pro (3.8K reputation)Pro (3.8K reputation)Pro (3.8K reputation)Pro (3.8K reputation)Pro (3.8K reputation)Pro (3.8K reputation)Pro (3.8K reputation)Pro (3.8K reputation)Pro (3.8K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 3.6K, Visits: 0
Things like this show us how intolerant those who claim to be tolerant really are. We are tolerant of all views, unless you disagree with us (and especially if you disagree with a sacred cow like abortion rights).
quickflick
quickflick
World Class
World Class (6.3K reputation)World Class (6.3K reputation)World Class (6.3K reputation)World Class (6.3K reputation)World Class (6.3K reputation)World Class (6.3K reputation)World Class (6.3K reputation)World Class (6.3K reputation)World Class (6.3K reputation)World Class (6.3K reputation)World Class (6.3K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 6.1K, Visits: 0
Why has this bloke been denied entry to Australia?

I disagree with this bloke. But he's entitled to his opinion and to express it.

Australia is becoming very authoritarian if it's refusing entry to so many of these people. Plain wrong.

"Character grounds"?
trident
trident
Semi-Pro
Semi-Pro (1.3K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.3K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.3K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.3K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.3K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.3K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.3K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.3K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.3K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.3K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.3K reputation)

Group: Banned Members
Posts: 1.3K, Visits: 0
=d> =d> =d>
well said Penny

Quote:
[size=8]US anti-abortion campaigner denied visa for Australia after Labor's intervention[/size]
Anti-abortion group Operation Rescue blames ‘viciously false accusations’ for denial of visa to its president, Troy Newman
Terri Butler
Labor’s Terri Butler, whose letter prompted Peter Dutton to cancel Troy Newman’s visa. Photograph: Mike Bowers for the Guardian
Daniel Hurst and Shalailah Medhora
Wednesday 30 September 2015 14.19 AEST Last modified on Wednesday 30 September 2015 21.22 AEST

The American anti-abortion campaigner Troy Newman has been denied a visa to travel to Australia, just days after the government indicated it might block the American singer Chris Brown from touring the country.

Newman was due to speak on the topic “save the babies down under” at events promoted by the group Right to Life Australia, but was branded an “anti-choice extremist” by the Labor MP Terri Butler, who said Newman’s visa should be denied on character grounds.


Labor calls for visa ban on activist who called for abortion doctors to be killed

Butler wrote to the immigration minister, Peter Dutton, on Monday arguing that the campaigner could “cause significant harm to our community” because he had previously called for the execution of abortion doctors.

On Wednesday Dutton said the government was taking action. “I can confirm that my department has cancelled the visa for Mr Troy Newman under Section 128 of the Migration Act,” the minister said.

“Mr Newman can appeal for a revocation of this decision and no further comment will be made during this appeal period.”

Newman is president of Operation Rescue, an anti-abortion group that denounced the visa cancellation. The group blamed “viciously false accusations brought by Australian pro-abortion activists and news media that Newman supports violence against abortion providers”.

“Newman has never advocated violence and in fact, urges pro-life activists to work within the governmental and legal system to accomplish change,” Operation Rescue said in a statement.

“Newman boarded his flight in Wichita, Kansas, hoping that the situation would be resolved by the time he arrived in Los Angeles. However, while boarding a connecting flight in Dehownver, Colorado, Newman was stopped and told he could not board his flight to LA because of an order by the Australian government.”

Newman’s allies posted footage of the scene at Denver as Newman argued with airport staff who told him he would have to contact the Australian government to contest their refusal to let him on the flight.


Troy Newman is refused access to his connecting flight in Denver.
Operation Rescue’s senior policy adviser, Cheryl Sullenger, said Newman had been the victim of “political persecution, plain and simple, as well as an attempt to silence the pro-life message in Australia”.

In the same statement, Right to Life Australia said the group was “very upset that this has happened and are working furiously to turn it around”.

The national president of the organisation, Margaret Tighe, told Guardian Australia that the group has been in touch with Dutton’s office to overturn the decision, which she calls a “gross denial” of Newman’s rights.

“We’re working as hard as we can to make sure his visa is reinstated,” Tighe said. “The reason they want to stop him coming is because he had been very effective … the only reason they are doing this is to prevent freedom of speech.”

Butler had focused on comments in the book Their Blood Cries Out, which was co-authored by Newman. She pointed to this passage: “In addition to our personal guilt in abortion, the United States government has abrogated its responsibility to properly deal with the blood-guilty. This responsibility rightly involves executing convicted murderers, including abortionists, for their crimes in order to expunge bloodguilt from the land and people.”

On Wednesday Butler welcomed the minister’s decision to block the visa and rejected claims Newman had been subjected to false accusations.

Butler said her letter to Dutton had quoted Newman’s own direct comments. “Right to Life should concentrate on making sure there is responsible and respectful debate and not on importing people who advocated for doctors to be executed for doing things that are lawful,” she said.

[size=8]Labor’s Senate leader, Penny Wong, backed Butler’s request for the visa to be cancelled. “Mr Newman’s public comments go well beyond what would be regarded as acceptable debate in this country,” Wong said. “His views are repugnant. Mr Newman’s presence in Australia risks inciting intimidation and violence against vulnerable women.”[/size]

The government’s decision to cancel Newman’s visa is a different process from the one adopted in the case of Brown, whose travel was scheduled for December. Brown was issued with a notice of intention to consider visa refusal, giving the artist 28 days to present material as to why he should be allowed into the country.


Chris Brown denied visa to tour Australia on character grounds
Read more
Brown pleaded guilty to attacking his then girlfriend, the pop singer Rihanna, in 2009 and was sentenced to five years of probation.

He was due to travel to Australia for shows in Perth, Melbourne, Sydney and Brisbane, but a petition by campaign group GetUp! to deny him a visa has attracted more than 14,000 signatures.

In a series of comments posted on his official Twitter account on Tuesday, Brown argued that his “life mistakes should be a wake up call for everyone” and he should be allowed to proceed with his visit.

“I would be more than grateful to come to Australia to raise awareness about domestic violence,” he wrote.

Brown said young people did not listen to parents or public service announcements, but entertainers had the power to change lives.

http://www.theguardian.com/world/2015/sep/30/anti-abortion-campaigner-denied-visa-australia-troy-newman
humbert
humbert
Semi-Pro
Semi-Pro (1.7K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.7K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.7K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.7K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.7K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.7K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.7K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.7K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.7K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.7K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.7K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 1.6K, Visits: 0
Shit paternalist mentality strikes again.
quickflick
quickflick
World Class
World Class (6.3K reputation)World Class (6.3K reputation)World Class (6.3K reputation)World Class (6.3K reputation)World Class (6.3K reputation)World Class (6.3K reputation)World Class (6.3K reputation)World Class (6.3K reputation)World Class (6.3K reputation)World Class (6.3K reputation)World Class (6.3K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 6.1K, Visits: 0
sydneycroatia58 wrote:
I'd say it's probably politica tokenism if Australia was the only country to do it, but fact of the matter is New Zealand, the UK and Canada have all denied him entry into the country before. Not like Brown is the first person this has happened to either, Floyd Mayweather was denied a visa earlier this year.

Also fairly sure the immigration department has the right to refuse a visa for anyone with a substantial criminal record, which is defined as being a prison sentence of at least 12 months or a suspended sentence. So really they have every right to refuse a visa if they want.


They have the right to do so but it becomes absurd if he has served his sentence. Also, there should be consistency in terms of denying entry. This is inconsistent, as well as unfair.
sydneycroatia58
sydneycroatia58
Legend
Legend (41K reputation)Legend (41K reputation)Legend (41K reputation)Legend (41K reputation)Legend (41K reputation)Legend (41K reputation)Legend (41K reputation)Legend (41K reputation)Legend (41K reputation)Legend (41K reputation)Legend (41K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 40K, Visits: 0
I'd say it's probably politica tokenism if Australia was the only country to do it, but fact of the matter is New Zealand, the UK and Canada have all denied him entry into the country before. Not like Brown is the first person this has happened to either, Floyd Mayweather was denied a visa earlier this year.

Also fairly sure the immigration department has the right to refuse a visa for anyone with a substantial criminal record, which is defined as being a prison sentence of at least 12 months or a suspended sentence. So really they have every right to refuse a visa if they want.
trident
trident
Semi-Pro
Semi-Pro (1.3K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.3K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.3K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.3K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.3K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.3K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.3K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.3K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.3K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.3K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.3K reputation)

Group: Banned Members
Posts: 1.3K, Visits: 0
u4486662 wrote:
trident wrote:
I think its time we had a national conversation about the out of control domestic violence epidemic.


Where have u been the last two years?


aisle 7 :)
quickflick
quickflick
World Class
World Class (6.3K reputation)World Class (6.3K reputation)World Class (6.3K reputation)World Class (6.3K reputation)World Class (6.3K reputation)World Class (6.3K reputation)World Class (6.3K reputation)World Class (6.3K reputation)World Class (6.3K reputation)World Class (6.3K reputation)World Class (6.3K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 6.1K, Visits: 0
What's there more chance of happening? Us hosting the World Cup or us hosing the World Cup?
u4486662
u4486662
World Class
World Class (8.8K reputation)World Class (8.8K reputation)World Class (8.8K reputation)World Class (8.8K reputation)World Class (8.8K reputation)World Class (8.8K reputation)World Class (8.8K reputation)World Class (8.8K reputation)World Class (8.8K reputation)World Class (8.8K reputation)World Class (8.8K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 8.8K, Visits: 0
trident wrote:
I think its time we had a national conversation about the out of control domestic violence epidemic.


Where have u been the last two years?
trident
trident
Semi-Pro
Semi-Pro (1.3K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.3K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.3K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.3K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.3K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.3K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.3K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.3K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.3K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.3K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.3K reputation)

Group: Banned Members
Posts: 1.3K, Visits: 0
quickflick wrote:
Eastern Glory wrote:
OMFG.

People complaining about this are idiots. Just idiots.
You want action against domestic violence? Well it starts here. Of course there are other areas of it that need addressing, but it starts here. End of.


He has already met the terms of his conviction.

How does it start here? It's supposed to have ended. He has done the time.

This is just political tokenism. How does discriminating against a famous American who claims to be an musician do anything to address to domestic violence for Australian women?

Nobody should be punished beyond their sentence (and the Australian Immigration Department has mandate to do so).

I agree there's a culture of domestic violence. How bad it is and how terrible compared to violence in general, I'm not sure. Nevertheless, there's too much domestic violence and it needs to be cracked down on.

But this isn't doing that. This is just Malcolm Turnbull appealing to the sympathies of those women in the electorate who aren't the most cerebral.

[size=8]Suppose Australia were, one day, to hose the FIFA World Cup[/size]. If they're consistent, they Immigration Dept need to look into the backgrounds of all the players who play in the World Cup. Suppose the best player in the England side and the Brazil side had similar conviction to Brown. The Immigration Dept would be obliged to refuse them entry.

Can you imagine what would happen? We might lose the right to host the World Cup.


:)
quickflick
quickflick
World Class
World Class (6.3K reputation)World Class (6.3K reputation)World Class (6.3K reputation)World Class (6.3K reputation)World Class (6.3K reputation)World Class (6.3K reputation)World Class (6.3K reputation)World Class (6.3K reputation)World Class (6.3K reputation)World Class (6.3K reputation)World Class (6.3K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 6.1K, Visits: 0
Eastern Glory wrote:
OMFG.

People complaining about this are idiots. Just idiots.
You want action against domestic violence? Well it starts here. Of course there are other areas of it that need addressing, but it starts here. End of.


He has already met the terms of his conviction.

How does it start here? It's supposed to have ended. He has done the time.

This is just political tokenism. How does discriminating against a famous American who claims to be an musician do anything to address to domestic violence for Australian women?

Nobody should be punished beyond their sentence (and the Australian Immigration Department has not got a mandate to do so).

I agree there's a culture of domestic violence. How bad it is and how terrible compared to violence in general, I'm not sure. Nevertheless, there's too much domestic violence and it needs to be cracked down on.

But this isn't doing that. This is just Malcolm Turnbull appealing to the sympathies of those women in the electorate who aren't the most cerebral.

Suppose Australia were, one day, to hose the FIFA World Cup. If they're consistent, they Immigration Dept need to look into the backgrounds of all the players who play in the World Cup. Suppose the best player in the England side and the Brazil side had similar conviction to Brown. The Immigration Dept would be obliged to refuse them entry.

Can you imagine what would happen? We might lose the right to host the World Cup.

Edited by quickflick: 28/9/2015 11:32:38 PM
trident
trident
Semi-Pro
Semi-Pro (1.3K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.3K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.3K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.3K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.3K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.3K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.3K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.3K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.3K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.3K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.3K reputation)

Group: Banned Members
Posts: 1.3K, Visits: 0
I think its time we had a national conversation about the out of control domestic violence epidemic.


Condemned666
Condemned666
Pro
Pro (3.4K reputation)Pro (3.4K reputation)Pro (3.4K reputation)Pro (3.4K reputation)Pro (3.4K reputation)Pro (3.4K reputation)Pro (3.4K reputation)Pro (3.4K reputation)Pro (3.4K reputation)Pro (3.4K reputation)Pro (3.4K reputation)

Group: Banned Members
Posts: 3.4K, Visits: 0
what kind of music does he make? Never heard of him

Now, testify!->

[youtube]GF8aaTu2kg0[/youtube]


GO


Select a Forum....























Inside Sport


Search