adrtho
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 5.9K,
Visits: 0
|
Quote:Speaking at the Gaidar Forum, Head of the Russian Sberbank Bank German Gref said that Russia appeared to be among the countries that "are losing".
According to Gref, the world will follow the path of development of renewable energy only, Censor.NET reports citing the Russian media. He has noted that China is going to increase the total capacity of power plants generating renewable energy to 560 GW in the coming years. "As a comparison, this is 2.5 times more than the total capacity of the Russian Federation," the head of Sberbank said. Source:
"The closest forecast is that China will consume ... about 45 percent less conventional energy sources at the rate which it currently develops alternative energy. This is our coal, which we develop and deliver on a large scale and keep making substantial investment in coal intended for the Chinese market. And hydrocarbon. One can say that this era has become history," RBC quoted German Gref as saying. German Gref also spoke about the crisis in the oil market, which, according to him, was caused by the "sweeping changes in consumption". "The era of hydrocarbons is over. As the Stone Age was over not because there were no stones, the oil age is over the same way," Gref said. "The future has come sooner than we expected. We already live in this future now. Welcome to the future!" the head of Sberbank said. German Gref believes that the question of oil price is irrelevant. "We will be very far behind, if we do not change the concept of our social approach," Gref warned. "We lost the competition and ended up in the camp of countries that are losing, the countries-downshifters. The countries and people, who have managed to adapt and invest in it in due time, are the winners. Those who have not are going to lose a lot," he concluded. According to Gref, Russia is facing "a huge income gap" compared to the "countries-winners".
|
|
|
|
u4486662
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 8.8K,
Visits: 0
|
Gaidar forum.
|
|
|
paulbagzFC
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 44K,
Visits: 0
|
MFW adrtho has gone back to posting about Russia.  -PB
|
|
|
adrtho
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 5.9K,
Visits: 0
|
paulbagzFC wrote:MFW adrtho has gone back to posting about Russia.
-PB it more about Oil Paul...if you remember, i said Oil is dead and going to $20 barrel when Oil was at $60s I also said Russia will defaults on its loans, this bet is still very much in the money
|
|
|
adrtho
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 5.9K,
Visits: 0
|
Tard News wrote:The was an "Oil Crisis" in 1973 and we survived that. this oil Crisis, is more about the world no longer needing oil..and those countries who are depend on oil export are now all fucked
|
|
|
switters
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 5.6K,
Visits: 0
|
well russia is fucked then.
|
|
|
Slobodan Drauposevic
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 14K,
Visits: 0
|
This bloke.
|
|
|
SocaWho
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 9.3K,
Visits: 0
|
8-[ ....never ceases to amaze
Edited by Socawho: 16/1/2016 02:27:30 PM
|
|
|
adrtho
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 5.9K,
Visits: 0
|
SocaWho wrote:8-[ ....never ceases to amaze
Edited by Socawho: 16/1/2016 02:27:30 PM whats amazing, is you didn't bet on oil falling to $20 a barrel from $60...considering how smart and overall winner you are
|
|
|
Unshackled
|
|
Group: Banned Members
Posts: 241,
Visits: 0
|
Draupnir wrote:This bloke. :oops: A bit like Lukerobinho wouldn't you say :lol: Edited by unshackled: 16/1/2016 11:23:20 PM
|
|
|
433
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 6.7K,
Visits: 0
|
Well as long as the Saudi's can slide into irrelevance, I'll be pretty chuffed.
|
|
|
adrtho
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 5.9K,
Visits: 0
|
433 wrote:Well as long as the Saudi's can slide into irrelevance, I'll be pretty chuffed. it clear the US want (is) to pull out from Middle East , there just no reason for USA to protect world Oil supply when USA has 100% of it own capacity....those oil countries that haven't diversified are f-cked
|
|
|
adrtho
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 5.9K,
Visits: 0
|
Oil below $28
Oil could go to $15 from here
Edited by adrtho: 20/1/2016 09:32:11 PM
|
|
|
AzzaMarch
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 1.7K,
Visits: 0
|
Especially with Iran about to go back online as an oil producer
|
|
|
adrtho
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 5.9K,
Visits: 0
|
Oil $26
|
|
|
Murdoch Rags Ltd
|
|
Group: Banned Members
Posts: 1.2K,
Visits: 0
|
adrtho wrote:433 wrote:Well as long as the Saudi's can slide into irrelevance, I'll be pretty chuffed. it clear the US want (is) to pull out from Middle East , there just no reason for USA to protect world Oil supply when USA has 100% of it own capacity....those oil countries that haven't diversified are f-cked At the Paris global warming conference, the Saudi delegation were noted for their pedantic nitpicking over wording in the agreement
|
|
|
Crusader
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 5.8K,
Visits: 0
|
adrtho wrote:Tard News wrote:The was an "Oil Crisis" in 1973 and we survived that. this oil Crisis, is more about the world no longer needing oil..and those countries who are depend on oil export are now all fucked The world is consuming and producing more oil than ever, the low prices are because the Saudis have flooded the market to apply pressure on the Russians and Iranians in support of the ongoing proxy wars over regional power. An added bonus to them is that it makes US domestic production from shake oil and fracking economically unviable. You could not be more wrong if you tried.
|
|
|
Crusader
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 5.8K,
Visits: 0
|
adrtho wrote:433 wrote:Well as long as the Saudi's can slide into irrelevance, I'll be pretty chuffed. it clear the US want (is) to pull out from Middle East , there just no reason for USA to protect world Oil supply when USA has 100% of it own capacity....those oil countries that haven't diversified are f-cked China lie about all of there figures to please Western greenies, and just before the latest gathering of Eco-fundamentalists in Paris they announced that they have been lieing about their CO2 emissions which are actually 18% higher than claimed (although even that is an understatement). Those countries who have diversified are fucked because they are pissing money away on the most inefficient forms of power generation at a time when fossil fuels are cheaper and more abundant than ever.
|
|
|
adrtho
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 5.9K,
Visits: 0
|
Crusader wrote:adrtho wrote:433 wrote:Well as long as the Saudi's can slide into irrelevance, I'll be pretty chuffed. it clear the US want (is) to pull out from Middle East , there just no reason for USA to protect world Oil supply when USA has 100% of it own capacity....those oil countries that haven't diversified are f-cked China lie about all of there figures to please Western greenies, and just before the latest gathering of Eco-fundamentalists in Paris they announced that they have been lieing about their CO2 emissions which are actually 18% higher than claimed (although even that is an understatement). Those countries who have diversified are fucked because they are pissing money away on the most inefficient forms of power generation at a time when fossil fuels are cheaper and more abundant than ever. when USA kills oil pipe line from Canada to Gulf of Mexico, when USA make deal with Iran to end there sanctions , which is a fuck you to Saudi Arabia and other Sunni Arabs oil producing countries,,this is a sign the USA no longer see oil as the energy Source that needs to be secure Oil is dead, get on broad , or be a loser over the next 10 years
|
|
|
adrtho
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 5.9K,
Visits: 0
|
Crusader wrote:adrtho wrote:433 wrote:Well as long as the Saudi's can slide into irrelevance, I'll be pretty chuffed. it clear the US want (is) to pull out from Middle East , there just no reason for USA to protect world Oil supply when USA has 100% of it own capacity....those oil countries that haven't diversified are f-cked China lie about all of there figures to please Western greenies, and just before the latest gathering of Eco-fundamentalists in Paris they announced that they have been lieing about their CO2 emissions which are actually 18% higher than claimed (although even that is an understatement). Those countries who have diversified are fucked because they are pissing money away on the most inefficient forms of power generation at a time when fossil fuels are cheaper and more abundant than ever. by the way , Oil not cheap on a historic inflation adjustment average, Oil should be at $18 to be at the inflation adjustment average...that still 33% drop from today oil prices and, when the top selling luxury sedan car is electronic, that tell me it will very likely trickle down the car category, as that what happens to improvements in cars, luxury sedan car to compact executive car to Large family car (S-Class down to C-class to Holdem Commodore) Edited by adrtho: 23/1/2016 11:27:30 PM
|
|
|
Crusader
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 5.8K,
Visits: 0
|
adrtho wrote:Crusader wrote:adrtho wrote:433 wrote:Well as long as the Saudi's can slide into irrelevance, I'll be pretty chuffed. it clear the US want (is) to pull out from Middle East , there just no reason for USA to protect world Oil supply when USA has 100% of it own capacity....those oil countries that haven't diversified are f-cked China lie about all of there figures to please Western greenies, and just before the latest gathering of Eco-fundamentalists in Paris they announced that they have been lieing about their CO2 emissions which are actually 18% higher than claimed (although even that is an understatement). Those countries who have diversified are fucked because they are pissing money away on the most inefficient forms of power generation at a time when fossil fuels are cheaper and more abundant than ever. when USA kills oil pipe line from Canada to Gulf of Mexico, when USA make deal with Iran to end there sanctions , which is a fuck you to Saudi Arabia and other Sunni Arabs oil producing countries,,this is a sign the USA no longer see oil as the energy Source that needs to be secure Oil is dead, get on broad , or be a loser over the next 10 years No, that was a combination of green lunatics and the Saudis driving down the price of oil to make US domestic production less economically viable.
|
|
|
adrtho
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 5.9K,
Visits: 0
|
Crusader wrote:adrtho wrote:Crusader wrote:adrtho wrote:433 wrote:Well as long as the Saudi's can slide into irrelevance, I'll be pretty chuffed. it clear the US want (is) to pull out from Middle East , there just no reason for USA to protect world Oil supply when USA has 100% of it own capacity....those oil countries that haven't diversified are f-cked China lie about all of there figures to please Western greenies, and just before the latest gathering of Eco-fundamentalists in Paris they announced that they have been lieing about their CO2 emissions which are actually 18% higher than claimed (although even that is an understatement). Those countries who have diversified are fucked because they are pissing money away on the most inefficient forms of power generation at a time when fossil fuels are cheaper and more abundant than ever. when USA kills oil pipe line from Canada to Gulf of Mexico, when USA make deal with Iran to end there sanctions , which is a fuck you to Saudi Arabia and other Sunni Arabs oil producing countries,,this is a sign the USA no longer see oil as the energy Source that needs to be secure Oil is dead, get on broad , or be a loser over the next 10 years No, that was a combination of green lunatics and the Saudis driving down the price of oil to make US domestic production less economically viable. that the short term play for Saudis ..US domestic oil production can be turn off and on like a switch, other oil countries can't do this, so it doesn't matter what Saudis do in short term ....but what you don't understand is other thing like, USA trying to pull out of Middle east, US killing oil pipe lines, and US letting US oil to now be exported what happen when 50% of all cars in USA is run on electricity, what does that do to oil?, oil supply when something new happens in the luxury car market, it ends up trickling down to the mass market car ...guys paying $120k for a car in USA, don't tend to be all green lunatics Edited by adrtho: 25/1/2016 08:47:53 AM
|
|
|
paulbagzFC
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 44K,
Visits: 0
|
Yeh but sparky cars wont give me the torwue of a phat V8 m8 so your points are invalid. -PB
|
|
|
adrtho
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 5.9K,
Visits: 0
|
paulbagzFC wrote:Yeh but sparky cars wont give me the torwue of a phat V8 m8 so your points are invalid.
-PB :lol: Tesla car shit all over V8 for torque [youtube]6eGhjhx8O9M[/youtube] Edited by adrtho: 25/1/2016 12:00:28 PM
|
|
|
Murdoch Rags Ltd
|
|
Group: Banned Members
Posts: 1.2K,
Visits: 0
|
Quote:Plunging oil prices have been blamed for a sharp rise in the number of UK oil and gas companies going bust. Last year, 28 oil and gas service firms entered insolvency, up from 18 in 2014, according to research by accountancy firm Moore Stephens. The company said the increase was "an almost inevitable result" of the drop in the oil price and the consequent cancellation of projects worldwide. It estimates some $200bn (£140bn) worth of projects were cancelled last year. Moore Stephens said the rise in oil and gas firm insolvencies was in stark contrast to 2010, when just four firms went bust in the 12 months to the end of September. "Oil and gas service companies expanded their businesses over the last decade based on an oil price well above the current one. "The pain caused by the oil price fall has translated into a rising tide of financial distress across the sector," said Moore Stephens head of restructuring and insolvency, Jeremy Willmont. The figures from Moore Stephens come just days after oil services giant Schlumberger said it had cut 10,000 jobs in the past three months amid the plunge in oil prices. Norwegian company DNV GL, an industry consultant, said its survey of 921 senior industry players showed the majority believed the industry was repeating the same mistakes of previous downturns, with 56% concerned over loss of jobs and experience. Nearly three quarters of those it surveyed said they were preparing their company for a sustained period of low oil prices. Opec resolute Law firm Pinsent Masons said its survey showed that many of those in the oilfield services industry were hoping to capitalise on the drop in oil prices by buying up distressed firms. In total, 70% of the 200 senior executives it surveyed were actively considering an acquisition within the next year, it found. Oil prices have fallen by 70% in the past 15 months. The drop in the price of oil has been driven by oversupply, mainly due to US shale oil flooding the market. At the same time, demand has fallen because of a slowdown in economic growth in China and Europe. Historically, Opec has cut production to support prices. But led by Saudi Arabia, by far the group's most powerful member, the group has resolutely refused to trim supply this time. Many analysts have slashed their 2016 oil price forecasts, with Morgan Stanley analysts saying that "oil in the $20s is possible." [size=8]Economists at the Royal Bank of Scotland say that oil could fall to $16, while Standard Chartered predicts that prices could hit just $10 a barrel.[/size] http://www.bbc.com/news/business-35397038
|
|
|
paulbagzFC
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 44K,
Visits: 0
|
adrtho wrote:paulbagzFC wrote:Yeh but sparky cars wont give me the torwue of a phat V8 m8 so your points are invalid.
-PB :lol: Tesla car shit all over V8 for torque [youtube]6eGhjhx8O9M[/youtube] Edited by adrtho: 25/1/2016 12:00:28 PM Where's the torque numbers? -PB
|
|
|
chillbilly
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 6.2K,
Visits: 0
|
paulbagzFC wrote:Yeh but sparky cars wont give me the torwue of a phat V8 m8 so your points are invalid.
-PB How are you measuring the torque?
|
|
|
Les Gock
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 681,
Visits: 0
|
Here's the long-term Crude Oil chart to provide some context:  People who know a thing or two about investing aren't writing off oil just yet. Buffett has recently spent pocket change on a Texan oil company (US$4.5 billion). Goldman Sachs president discusses his thoughts on oil: http://www.bloomberg.com/news/videos/2016-01-22/cohn-the-oil-market-is-rebalancing-nowThere's no guarantees in this world, but i'd take the opinion of market big boys over a couple of quacks on a football forum...
|
|
|
Murdoch Rags Ltd
|
|
Group: Banned Members
Posts: 1.2K,
Visits: 0
|
chillbilly wrote:paulbagzFC wrote:Yeh but sparky cars wont give me the torwue of a phat V8 m8 so your points are invalid.
-PB How are you measuring the torque? Instant torque is much higher. The P90D is even more powerful
|
|
|
AzzaMarch
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 1.7K,
Visits: 0
|
Les Gock wrote:Here's the long-term Crude Oil chart to provide some context:  People who know a thing or two about investing aren't writing off oil just yet. Buffett has recently spent pocket change on a Texan oil company (US$4.5 billion). Goldman Sachs president discusses his thoughts on oil: http://www.bloomberg.com/news/videos/2016-01-22/cohn-the-oil-market-is-rebalancing-nowThere's no guarantees in this world, but i'd take the opinion of market big boys over a couple of quacks on a football forum... Cheers for that - I agree with the long term context. I don't know why some people are taking cheap oil to mean "the end of oil". The simple economic of the oil industry mean that once you have the oil rigs set up and pumping oil, it is generally more expensive to turn the taps off and mothball production than it is to keep pumping - your sunk costs have already been paid. The only relevant figure is the marginal cost of the next gallon. And generally that is pretty cheap. Weren't those proclaiming the end of oil predicting that oil would become prohibitively expensive and run out in the next couple of decades? I do think that we are looking at a "new normal" price that is much lower than previously, for 3 reasons: -Chinese economic growth slowing structurally as they become a much bigger economy than they were 10 years ago - Natural / shale gas production coming online and becoming much more efficient (therefore cost competitive) - Iran rejoining the oil market But none of the above means the end of oil, it is just rebalancing the market towards consumers, instead of producers.
|
|
|
adrtho
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 5.9K,
Visits: 0
|
paulbagzFC wrote:adrtho wrote:paulbagzFC wrote:Yeh but sparky cars wont give me the torwue of a phat V8 m8 so your points are invalid.
-PB :lol: Tesla car shit all over V8 for torque Edited by adrtho: 25/1/2016 12:00:28 PM Where's the torque numbers? -PB the car speeds away from V8 , that can only mean there higher torque at the wheel Edited by adrtho: 25/1/2016 10:44:53 PM
|
|
|
adrtho
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 5.9K,
Visits: 0
|
AzzaMarch wrote:Les Gock wrote:Here's the long-term Crude Oil chart to provide some context: People who know a thing or two about investing aren't writing off oil just yet. Buffett has recently spent pocket change on a Texan oil company (US$4.5 billion). Goldman Sachs president discusses his thoughts on oil: http://www.bloomberg.com/news/videos/2016-01-22/cohn-the-oil-market-is-rebalancing-nowThere's no guarantees in this world, but i'd take the opinion of market big boys over a couple of quacks on a football forum... Cheers for that - I agree with the long term context. I don't know why some people are taking cheap oil to mean "the end of oil". The simple economic of the oil industry mean that once you have the oil rigs set up and pumping oil, it is generally more expensive to turn the taps off and mothball production than it is to keep pumping - your sunk costs have already been paid. The only relevant figure is the marginal cost of the next gallon. And generally that is pretty cheap. Weren't those proclaiming the end of oil predicting that oil would become prohibitively expensive and run out in the next couple of decades? I do think that we are looking at a "new normal" price that is much lower than previously, for 3 reasons: -Chinese economic growth slowing structurally as they become a much bigger economy than they were 10 years ago - Natural / shale gas production coming online and becoming much more efficient (therefore cost competitive) - Iran rejoining the oil market But none of the above means the end of oil, it is just rebalancing the market towards consumers, instead of producers. the US can turn Oil production on and off, like a switch...it why oil price can't go up, as USA can just increase production at the drop of a hat what happen to oil when majority of cars are electronic?...70% of USA oil consumption is for transportation if you're betting on oil, you're betting that electronic car will not take any market share of the car industry Edited by adrtho: 25/1/2016 11:08:36 PM
|
|
|
adrtho
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 5.9K,
Visits: 0
|
Les Gock wrote:Here's the long-term Crude Oil chart to provide some context:
People who know a thing or two about investing aren't writing off oil just yet. Buffett has recently spent pocket change on a Texan oil company (US$4.5 billion). Goldman Sachs president discusses his thoughts on oil:
There's no guarantees in this world, but i'd take the opinion of market big boys over a couple of quacks on a football forum... you should take the market boys over what anyone say on a football forum......but a lest i did post a topic last year and said, oil is go to $20 when oil was around $60 and all the talking heads on CNBC was saying oil going back to $100 soon this is the way i see oil industry collapse 1.Becaiuse the well off people who would normally buy a new S-Class Mercedes or BMW 7 Series are buying Telsa electronic car 2. will then extend Telsa electronic car sales to the Mid size luxury car and entry level luxury car E-Class and C-Class Mercedes 3. which then force Mercedes or BMW to switch a large part of there car production to electronic car , because 80% of there business is in these car categories, and they run the risk of going extinct switch over (Mercedes already planing to move 50% of there cars to electronic 4. this forces Toyota and Volkswagen to move there luxury car brands (Lexus and Audi ) to electronic car to save any relevance what's so ever...this as means Toyota and Volkswagen have the mass produce for Full size and Mid size car, 5. where it bye, bye to oil all the new laws and International agreements are leading to the force move to electronic car...there no new law coming to save the oil industry, coming to block ...the Car industry can't stop this, if a car company does change, it dead Telsa company already has a market cap of $32b, this is 60% of Ford or GM market cap...The market boys are betting that Telsa will sell a lot more then 50,000 electronic car over the coming years Edited by adrtho: 25/1/2016 11:49:56 PM
|
|
|
WhiteFalcon
|
|
Group: Banned Members
Posts: 4,
Visits: 0
|
Despite the world being awash in oil, OPEC’s refusal to cut production has been widely seen as an attempt to hobble the U.S. share industry and shore up its own market share. By maintaining oil production output, OPEC is hoping to drive high-cost fracking producers out of the market.Well ,With oil prices still down more than 40% since last June and the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development downgrading global growth forecasts, many are wondering where oil prices will be in 2016. While predictions for oil at $20.00 per barrel seem a little too bearish, a return of oil to $100.00 a barrel in 2016 might be a little too bullish.When it comes to an oil price forecast in 2016, $65.00 may be the new $85.00. what's your take on these guys????????
|
|
|
Murdoch Rags Ltd
|
|
Group: Banned Members
Posts: 1.2K,
Visits: 0
|
Lithium battery prices are crashing - General Motors publicly revealed their buying prices from LG on batteries at $145/kWh (LG cracked the shits when it happened). Expect $100/kWh when the Tesla Gigafactory opens All car manufacturers will go to the 'skateboard' design layout of batteries/chassis, as it's the most efficient. With battery chemistry improvements and allowing for weight, doing a back of envelope calculation, a 500km range car would only need a 60kWh battery pack costing the manufacturer $6000. The internal combustion engine market will be destroyed when this happens and consequently the oil market. Don't forget the massive increase in the home energy storage market as well, to help drive unit battery prices down. The question is how much lithium reserves are there in the world?
|
|
|
adrtho
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 5.9K,
Visits: 0
|
Murdoch Rags Ltd wrote:Lithium battery prices are crashing - General Motors publicly revealed their buying prices from LG on batteries at $145/kWh (LG cracked the shits when it happened). Expect $100/kWh when the Tesla Gigafactory opens All car manufacturers will go to the 'skateboard' design layout of batteries/chassis, as it's the most efficient. With battery chemistry improvements and allowing for weight, doing a back of envelope calculation, a 500km range car would only need a 60kWh battery pack costing the manufacturer $6000. The internal combustion engine market will be destroyed when this happens and consequently the oil market. Don't forget the massive increase in the home energy storage market as well, to help drive unit battery prices down. The question is how much lithium reserves are there in the world? i;m not a expert on lithium reserves, but from what i understand, there a lot of lithium in the world
|
|
|
BETHFC
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 8.2K,
Visits: 0
|
So when can we expect Tesla to start constructing engines for the shipping industry?
|
|
|
Slobodan Drauposevic
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 14K,
Visits: 0
|
ATTN: adrtho
Still waiting for Russia to default.
|
|
|
Murdoch Rags Ltd
|
|
Group: Banned Members
Posts: 1.2K,
Visits: 0
|
BETHFC wrote:So when can we expect Tesla to start constructing engines for the shipping industry? BMW, General Motors, Mercedes, Nissan, Renault, Ford, Tesla, etc all now have production electric cars. The ship market will be targeted at some stage
|
|
|
BETHFC
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 8.2K,
Visits: 0
|
Murdoch Rags Ltd wrote:BETHFC wrote:So when can we expect Tesla to start constructing engines for the shipping industry? BMW, General Motors, Mercedes, Nissan, Renault, Ford, Tesla, etc all now have production electric cars. The ship market will be targeted at some stage So then the oil era isn't over? Until they can produce a sufficient battery for a super tanker this thread is useless.
|
|
|
adrtho
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 5.9K,
Visits: 0
|
Draupnir wrote:ATTN: adrtho
Still waiting for Russia to default. why do you fucking care if i'm wrong or right? does it make you feel smart if i'm wrong? do you win or lose money?
|
|
|
Murdoch Rags Ltd
|
|
Group: Banned Members
Posts: 1.2K,
Visits: 0
|
BETHFC wrote:Murdoch Rags Ltd wrote:BETHFC wrote:So when can we expect Tesla to start constructing engines for the shipping industry? BMW, General Motors, Mercedes, Nissan, Renault, Ford, Tesla, etc all now have production electric cars. The ship market will be targeted at some stage So then the oil era isn't over? Until they can produce a sufficient battery for a super tanker this thread is useless. I think you've missed the gist of the thread
|
|
|
BETHFC
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 8.2K,
Visits: 0
|
Murdoch Rags Ltd wrote:BETHFC wrote:Murdoch Rags Ltd wrote:BETHFC wrote:So when can we expect Tesla to start constructing engines for the shipping industry? BMW, General Motors, Mercedes, Nissan, Renault, Ford, Tesla, etc all now have production electric cars. The ship market will be targeted at some stage So then the oil era isn't over? Until they can produce a sufficient battery for a super tanker this thread is useless. I think you've missed the gist of the thread Shipping is a massive industry. Sorry to interrupt your Tesla wank fest.
|
|
|
adrtho
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 5.9K,
Visits: 0
|
BETHFC wrote:Murdoch Rags Ltd wrote:BETHFC wrote:So when can we expect Tesla to start constructing engines for the shipping industry? BMW, General Motors, Mercedes, Nissan, Renault, Ford, Tesla, etc all now have production electric cars. The ship market will be targeted at some stage So then the oil era isn't over? Until they can produce a sufficient battery for a super tanker this thread is useless. do you know what percent the shipping industry use of oil each year? do you know what percent car use each year? so the shipping industry use of oil each year is what 3% ? Edited by adrtho: 16/3/2016 03:11:47 PM
|
|
|
Slobodan Drauposevic
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 14K,
Visits: 0
|
adrtho wrote:Draupnir wrote:ATTN: adrtho
Still waiting for Russia to default. why do you fucking care if i'm wrong or right? does it make you feel smart if i'm wrong? do you win or lose money? I care that you're wrong because all you do is talk utter nonsense and shit, and it's great to see you eat humble pie. Edited by Draupnir: 16/3/2016 01:06:07 PM
|
|
|
adrtho
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 5.9K,
Visits: 0
|
Draupnir wrote:adrtho wrote:Draupnir wrote:ATTN: adrtho
Still waiting for Russia to default. why do you fucking care if i'm wrong or right? does it make you feel smart if i'm wrong? do you win or lose money? I care that you're wrong because all you do is talk utter nonsense and shit, and it's great to see you eat humble pie. Edited by Draupnir: 16/3/2016 01:06:07 PM i make 10,000 bets a year, and out of those 10,000 bets, there a lot of wrong calls the call in Jan 2015, that Russia will default , is not a wrong call as of Today Edited by adrtho: 16/3/2016 01:20:29 PM
|
|
|
Slobodan Drauposevic
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 14K,
Visits: 0
|
adrtho wrote:Draupnir wrote:adrtho wrote:Draupnir wrote:ATTN: adrtho
Still waiting for Russia to default. why do you fucking care if i'm wrong or right? does it make you feel smart if i'm wrong? do you win or lose money? I care that you're wrong because all you do is talk utter nonsense and shit, and it's great to see you eat humble pie. Edited by Draupnir: 16/3/2016 01:06:07 PM i make 10,000 bets a year, and out of those 10,000 bets, there a lot of wrong calls the call in Jan 2015, that Russia will default , is not a wrong call as of Today Edited by adrtho: 16/3/2016 01:20:29 PM So it's a correct call as of today? Don't be even more of a fuckwit.
|
|
|
adrtho
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 5.9K,
Visits: 0
|
Draupnir wrote:adrtho wrote:Draupnir wrote:adrtho wrote:Draupnir wrote:ATTN: adrtho
Still waiting for Russia to default. why do you fucking care if i'm wrong or right? does it make you feel smart if i'm wrong? do you win or lose money? I care that you're wrong because all you do is talk utter nonsense and shit, and it's great to see you eat humble pie. Edited by Draupnir: 16/3/2016 01:06:07 PM i make 10,000 bets a year, and out of those 10,000 bets, there a lot of wrong calls the call in Jan 2015, that Russia will default , is not a wrong call as of Today Edited by adrtho: 16/3/2016 01:20:29 PM So it's a correct call as of today? Don't be even more of a fuckwit. that what Russia CDS price says what do you think about the USA sending Abrams tanks, armored vehicles,r to a caves in Norway? will you wave the US and Norway flag when a US Marine expeditionary brigade come to Norway to save it from Russia ?
|
|
|
paulbagzFC
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 44K,
Visits: 0
|
So how long does it take for you to be wrong? :lol: 4-5 years? 10? LEL. -PB
|
|
|
adrtho
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 5.9K,
Visits: 0
|
paulbagzFC wrote:So how long does it take for you to be wrong? :lol:
4-5 years?
10?
LEL.
-PB 5 years,,,but we already have a profit from it there very high chance Putin default just to fuck western banks over,,,if west keep bank sanctions on Russian Banks, why the fuck will Putin keep paying Western banks back there money
|
|
|
Slobodan Drauposevic
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 14K,
Visits: 0
|
adrtho wrote:Draupnir wrote:adrtho wrote:Draupnir wrote:adrtho wrote:Draupnir wrote:ATTN: adrtho
Still waiting for Russia to default. why do you fucking care if i'm wrong or right? does it make you feel smart if i'm wrong? do you win or lose money? I care that you're wrong because all you do is talk utter nonsense and shit, and it's great to see you eat humble pie. Edited by Draupnir: 16/3/2016 01:06:07 PM i make 10,000 bets a year, and out of those 10,000 bets, there a lot of wrong calls the call in Jan 2015, that Russia will default , is not a wrong call as of Today Edited by adrtho: 16/3/2016 01:20:29 PM So it's a correct call as of today? Don't be even more of a fuckwit. that what Russia CDS price says what do you think about the USA sending Abrams tanks, armored vehicles,r to a caves in Norway? will you wave the US and Norway flag when a US Marine expeditionary brigade come to Norway to save it from Russia ? I think that none of them mean the Russia has defaulted.
|
|
|
adrtho
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 5.9K,
Visits: 0
|
Draupnir wrote:adrtho wrote:Draupnir wrote:adrtho wrote:Draupnir wrote:adrtho wrote:Draupnir wrote:ATTN: adrtho
Still waiting for Russia to default. why do you fucking care if i'm wrong or right? does it make you feel smart if i'm wrong? do you win or lose money? I care that you're wrong because all you do is talk utter nonsense and shit, and it's great to see you eat humble pie. Edited by Draupnir: 16/3/2016 01:06:07 PM i make 10,000 bets a year, and out of those 10,000 bets, there a lot of wrong calls the call in Jan 2015, that Russia will default , is not a wrong call as of Today Edited by adrtho: 16/3/2016 01:20:29 PM So it's a correct call as of today? Don't be even more of a fuckwit. that what Russia CDS price says what do you think about the USA sending Abrams tanks, armored vehicles,r to a caves in Norway? will you wave the US and Norway flag when a US Marine expeditionary brigade come to Norway to save it from Russia ? I think that none of them mean the Russia has defaulted. Lucky for me, it doesn't matter what you think
|
|
|
BETHFC
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 8.2K,
Visits: 0
|
adrtho wrote:Draupnir wrote:adrtho wrote:Draupnir wrote:adrtho wrote:Draupnir wrote:adrtho wrote:Draupnir wrote:ATTN: adrtho
Still waiting for Russia to default. why do you fucking care if i'm wrong or right? does it make you feel smart if i'm wrong? do you win or lose money? I care that you're wrong because all you do is talk utter nonsense and shit, and it's great to see you eat humble pie. Edited by Draupnir: 16/3/2016 01:06:07 PM i make 10,000 bets a year, and out of those 10,000 bets, there a lot of wrong calls the call in Jan 2015, that Russia will default , is not a wrong call as of Today Edited by adrtho: 16/3/2016 01:20:29 PM So it's a correct call as of today? Don't be even more of a fuckwit. that what Russia CDS price says what do you think about the USA sending Abrams tanks, armored vehicles,r to a caves in Norway? will you wave the US and Norway flag when a US Marine expeditionary brigade come to Norway to save it from Russia ? I think that none of them mean the Russia has defaulted. Lucky for me, it doesn't matter what you think Then you two seriously need to stop fucking derailing threads with your bullshit. Grow up!
|
|
|
adrtho
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 5.9K,
Visits: 0
|
BETHFC wrote:adrtho wrote:Draupnir wrote:adrtho wrote:Draupnir wrote:adrtho wrote:Draupnir wrote:adrtho wrote:Draupnir wrote:ATTN: adrtho
Still waiting for Russia to default. why do you fucking care if i'm wrong or right? does it make you feel smart if i'm wrong? do you win or lose money? I care that you're wrong because all you do is talk utter nonsense and shit, and it's great to see you eat humble pie. Edited by Draupnir: 16/3/2016 01:06:07 PM i make 10,000 bets a year, and out of those 10,000 bets, there a lot of wrong calls the call in Jan 2015, that Russia will default , is not a wrong call as of Today Edited by adrtho: 16/3/2016 01:20:29 PM So it's a correct call as of today? Don't be even more of a fuckwit. that what Russia CDS price says what do you think about the USA sending Abrams tanks, armored vehicles,r to a caves in Norway? will you wave the US and Norway flag when a US Marine expeditionary brigade come to Norway to save it from Russia ? I think that none of them mean the Russia has defaulted. Lucky for me, it doesn't matter what you think Then you two seriously need to stop fucking derailing threads with your bullshit. Grow up! did you find what percent the shipping industry use of oil is each year?
|
|
|
BETHFC
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 8.2K,
Visits: 0
|
adrtho wrote: did you find what percent the shipping industry use of oil is each year?
No. Lots of oil. Enough to make oil extraction worthwhile.
|
|
|
adrtho
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 5.9K,
Visits: 0
|
BETHFC wrote:adrtho wrote: did you find what percent the shipping industry use of oil is each year?
No. Lots of oil. Enough to make oil extraction worthwhile. 3% , 4% or maybe 5%
|
|
|
Crusader
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 5.8K,
Visits: 0
|
adrtho wrote:BETHFC wrote:adrtho wrote: did you find what percent the shipping industry use of oil is each year?
No. Lots of oil. Enough to make oil extraction worthwhile. 3% , 4% or maybe 5% Seems like you don't know and are just plucking figures out of your arse.
|
|
|
Slobodan Drauposevic
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 14K,
Visits: 0
|
Crusader wrote:adrtho wrote:BETHFC wrote:adrtho wrote: did you find what percent the shipping industry use of oil is each year?
No. Lots of oil. Enough to make oil extraction worthwhile. 3% , 4% or maybe 5% Seems like you don't know and are just plucking figures out of your arse. hmm id like to see ur stats then crusader ELO has objectively shown shipping industry use lots
|
|
|
adrtho
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 5.9K,
Visits: 0
|
Crusader wrote:adrtho wrote:BETHFC wrote:adrtho wrote: did you find what percent the shipping industry use of oil is each year?
No. Lots of oil. Enough to make oil extraction worthwhile. 3% , 4% or maybe 5% Seems like you don't know and are just plucking figures out of your arse. water use 4.50% of all oil that goes to transportation, and transportation use about 70% of all oil ...so that make water (ships) total oil use at 3.15% passenger cars are about 45% of all total oil use ..so a switch of 7% of passenger cars to electric cars would be about the same as water (ship)
|
|
|
Slobodan Drauposevic
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 14K,
Visits: 0
|
11.mvfc.11 wrote:Draupnir wrote:Crusader wrote:adrtho wrote:BETHFC wrote:adrtho wrote: did you find what percent the shipping industry use of oil is each year?
No. Lots of oil. Enough to make oil extraction worthwhile. 3% , 4% or maybe 5% Seems like you don't know and are just plucking figures out of your arse. hmm id like to see ur stats then crusader ELO has objectively shown shipping industry use lots Enormous Litres of Oil Effectively Loving Obtuseness. UPDATE: Russia still hasn't defaulted.
|
|
|
adrtho
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 5.9K,
Visits: 0
|
Draupnir wrote:11.mvfc.11 wrote:Draupnir wrote:Crusader wrote:adrtho wrote:BETHFC wrote:adrtho wrote: did you find what percent the shipping industry use of oil is each year?
No. Lots of oil. Enough to make oil extraction worthwhile. 3% , 4% or maybe 5% Seems like you don't know and are just plucking figures out of your arse. hmm id like to see ur stats then crusader ELO has objectively shown shipping industry use lots Enormous Litres of Oil Effectively Loving Obtuseness. UPDATE: Russia still hasn't defaulted. no, but just like the Nazi they will do you feel part of the Aryan race Draupnir?
|
|
|
Slobodan Drauposevic
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 14K,
Visits: 0
|
adrtho wrote:do you feel part of the Aryan race Draupnir? I'd definitely fit in if that's what you're asking? Should I feel bad? Edited by Draupnir: 18/3/2016 04:03:39 PM
|
|
|
BETHFC
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 8.2K,
Visits: 0
|
Draupnir wrote:adrtho wrote:do you feel part of the Aryan race Draupnir? I'd definitely fit in if that's what you're asking? Should I feel bad? Edited by Draupnir: 18/3/2016 04:03:39 PM Can you two just fuck already? :lol:
|
|
|
Slobodan Drauposevic
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 14K,
Visits: 0
|
BETHFC wrote:Draupnir wrote:adrtho wrote:do you feel part of the Aryan race Draupnir? I'd definitely fit in if that's what you're asking? Should I feel bad? Edited by Draupnir: 18/3/2016 04:03:39 PM Can you two just fuck already? :lol: :lol: I don't mean it in a cruel way, but sometimes certain people just shouldn't breed for the sake of the future of humanity.
|
|
|
BETHFC
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 8.2K,
Visits: 0
|
Draupnir wrote:BETHFC wrote:Draupnir wrote:adrtho wrote:do you feel part of the Aryan race Draupnir? I'd definitely fit in if that's what you're asking? Should I feel bad? Edited by Draupnir: 18/3/2016 04:03:39 PM Can you two just fuck already? :lol: :lol: I don't mean it in a cruel way, but sometimes certain people just shouldn't breed for the sake of the future of humanity. :lol: Your's and Artho's offspring would legit be the end of humanity my friend :lol:
|
|
|
adrtho
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 5.9K,
Visits: 0
|
Draupnir wrote:adrtho wrote:do you feel part of the Aryan race Draupnir? I'd definitely fit in if that's what you're asking? Should I feel bad? Edited by Draupnir: 18/3/2016 04:03:39 PM is that why you hate jews?
|
|
|
Slobodan Drauposevic
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 14K,
Visits: 0
|
adrtho wrote:Draupnir wrote:adrtho wrote:do you feel part of the Aryan race Draupnir? I'd definitely fit in if that's what you're asking? Should I feel bad? Edited by Draupnir: 18/3/2016 04:03:39 PM is that why you hate jews? Where did I say I hate Jews?
|
|
|
adrtho
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 5.9K,
Visits: 0
|
Draupnir wrote:adrtho wrote:Draupnir wrote:adrtho wrote:do you feel part of the Aryan race Draupnir? I'd definitely fit in if that's what you're asking? Should I feel bad? Edited by Draupnir: 18/3/2016 04:03:39 PM is that why you hate jews? Where did I say I hate Jews? i was asking a question, why the ? at the end Edited by adrtho: 18/3/2016 04:37:45 PM
|
|
|
Slobodan Drauposevic
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 14K,
Visits: 0
|
adrtho wrote:Draupnir wrote:adrtho wrote:Draupnir wrote:adrtho wrote:do you feel part of the Aryan race Draupnir? I'd definitely fit in if that's what you're asking? Should I feel bad? Edited by Draupnir: 18/3/2016 04:03:39 PM is that why you hate jews? Where did I say I hate Jews? i was asking questions, why the ? at the end Sorry, but you just committed the plurium interrogationum fallacy. As if it wasn't already obvious you're a shit talker, you've all but confirmed it.
|
|
|
adrtho
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 5.9K,
Visits: 0
|
Draupnir wrote:adrtho wrote:Draupnir wrote:adrtho wrote:Draupnir wrote:adrtho wrote:do you feel part of the Aryan race Draupnir? I'd definitely fit in if that's what you're asking? Should I feel bad? Edited by Draupnir: 18/3/2016 04:03:39 PM is that why you hate jews? Where did I say I hate Jews? i was asking questions, why the ? at the end Sorry, but you just committed the plurium interrogationum fallacy. As if it wasn't already obvious you're a shit talker, you've all but confirmed it. so , you are a jew hater? who fit in with Aryan race
|
|
|
Slobodan Drauposevic
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 14K,
Visits: 0
|
|
|
|