Mooloolabadog
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 2K,
Visits: 0
|
+xWell I just witnessed the Graham Anusley fvckfest, FMD that cagina should be a politician with the sh!t that dribbles from his mouth. As far as he was concerned the strip was a fair contest, nothing to see there and as far as the obstruction (and he shows the rules) after waffling on about the officials don't influence the results of the game. BUT the rules state that the Referee can decide whether contact during the obstruction has made a significant impact on the defence... and the bunker decided the contact on Burns was "minimal"...in other words the referee (or bunker) have the power to influence the result of a game. That is criminal. These rules should not have any reference to interpretation. They should read either " you can or you can't ...full stop. When in doubt fall to the ground and the captain should make a scene. Our acting ability should be the envy of all Portuguese soccer players.
|
|
|
|
hounddog
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 9.9K,
Visits: 0
|
+xWell I just witnessed the Graham Anusley fvckfest, FMD that cagina should be a politician with the sh!t that dribbles from his mouth. As far as he was concerned the strip was a fair contest, nothing to see there and as far as the obstruction (and he shows the rules) after waffling on about the officials don't influence the results of the game. BUT the rules state that the Referee can decide whether contact during the obstruction has made a significant impact on the defence... and the bunker decided the contact on Burns was "minimal"...in other words the referee (or bunker) have the power to influence the result of a game. That is criminal. These rules should not have any reference to interpretation. They should read either " you can or you can't ...full stop. Funny how obstruction was outside shoulder all last season, regardless of how much contact. Burns needed to throw himself on the floor like the comical acting from DCE last season. Still very poor work from Okunbor on both plays, also Duffty not in the frame. Still overall we played well in a high standard contest we were the better side, just lack a bit of combination and a lucky bounce. Burton, JWK, Wardell all fantastic, TPJ much better in the middle, great fowards rotation. I'm very happy to be proven wrong about Wardell, in a better side he is just doing his job, rsther than trying to produce a miracle. Offloads from TPJ and King great, most offloads I can remeber from a dogs side in a willing contest for years. We just need to keep up the standard and drop Okunbor. Bad calls from the ref snd bunker are beyond our control. Overall the ref was good, better than any ref called Sutton by a long way.
|
|
|
ODF
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 2.3K,
Visits: 0
|
Yeah I agree and we got a very good run from the ref but they have to be more consistant with the rules. I hope our next meeting with the Groncos we give them a fair touch up.
|
|
|
Mooloolabadog
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 2K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+xWell I just witnessed the Graham Anusley fvckfest, FMD that cagina should be a politician with the sh!t that dribbles from his mouth. As far as he was concerned the strip was a fair contest, nothing to see there and as far as the obstruction (and he shows the rules) after waffling on about the officials don't influence the results of the game. BUT the rules state that the Referee can decide whether contact during the obstruction has made a significant impact on the defence... and the bunker decided the contact on Burns was "minimal"...in other words the referee (or bunker) have the power to influence the result of a game. That is criminal. These rules should not have any reference to interpretation. They should read either " you can or you can't ...full stop. Funny how obstruction was outside shoulder all last season, regardless of how much contact. Burns needed to throw himself on the floor like the comical acting from DCE last season. Still very poor work from Okunbor on both plays, also Duffty not in the frame. Still overall we played well in a high standard contest we were the better side, just lack a bit of combination and a lucky bounce. Burton, JWK, Wardell all fantastic, TPJ much better in the middle, great fowards rotation. I'm very happy to be proven wrong about Wardell, in a better side he is just doing his job, rsther than trying to produce a miracle. Offloads from TPJ and King great, most offloads I can remeber from a dogs side in a willing contest for years. We just need to keep up the standard and drop Okunbor. Bad calls from the ref snd bunker are beyond our control. Overall the ref was good, better than any ref called Sutton by a long way. It's hard to see how Okunbar holds his spot. His physical limitations, mainly poor acceleration and slow turning circle, need to be compensated by football smarts. Unfortunately he does not demonstrate any. Constantly loses his winger, doesn't trust his inside defenders and doesn't shut down the attack when he jams in. Must go.
|
|
|
Mooloolabadog
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 2K,
Visits: 0
|
Cameron Green, batting 6, time to get some serious runs.
|
|
|
Mick O
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 1.8K,
Visits: 0
|
+xWell I just witnessed the Graham Anusley fvckfest, FMD that cagina should be a politician with the sh!t that dribbles from his mouth. As far as he was concerned the strip was a fair contest, nothing to see there and as far as the obstruction (and he shows the rules) after waffling on about the officials don't influence the results of the game. BUT the rules state that the Referee can decide whether contact during the obstruction has made a significant impact on the defence... and the bunker decided the contact on Burns was "minimal"...in other words the referee (or bunker) have the power to influence the result of a game. That is criminal. These rules should not have any reference to interpretation. They should read either " you can or you can't ...full stop. Agreed. The rule I thought was obvious. If you make contact on the outside of a player it is obstruction. It really hurts the game that the refs boss has backed a decision that even the Broncos coach thought was incorrect.
|
|
|
Mick O
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 1.8K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+xWell I just witnessed the Graham Anusley fvckfest, FMD that cagina should be a politician with the sh!t that dribbles from his mouth. As far as he was concerned the strip was a fair contest, nothing to see there and as far as the obstruction (and he shows the rules) after waffling on about the officials don't influence the results of the game. BUT the rules state that the Referee can decide whether contact during the obstruction has made a significant impact on the defence... and the bunker decided the contact on Burns was "minimal"...in other words the referee (or bunker) have the power to influence the result of a game. That is criminal. These rules should not have any reference to interpretation. They should read either " you can or you can't ...full stop. Funny how obstruction was outside shoulder all last season, regardless of how much contact. Burns needed to throw himself on the floor like the comical acting from DCE last season. Still very poor work from Okunbor on both plays, also Duffty not in the frame. Still overall we played well in a high standard contest we were the better side, just lack a bit of combination and a lucky bounce. Burton, JWK, Wardell all fantastic, TPJ much better in the middle, great fowards rotation. I'm very happy to be proven wrong about Wardell, in a better side he is just doing his job, rsther than trying to produce a miracle. Offloads from TPJ and King great, most offloads I can remeber from a dogs side in a willing contest for years. We just need to keep up the standard and drop Okunbor. Bad calls from the ref snd bunker are beyond our control. Overall the ref was good, better than any ref called Sutton by a long way. It's hard to see how Okunbar holds his spot. His physical limitations, mainly poor acceleration and slow turning circle, need to be compensated by football smarts. Unfortunately he does not demonstrate any. Constantly loses his winger, doesn't trust his inside defenders and doesn't shut down the attack when he jams in. Must go. It’s a shame Corey Allen is injured. He would combine very well with Burns.
|
|
|
ODF
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 2.3K,
Visits: 0
|
We all know what a liability Okunbor is and I really hate bagging players out but he has to go. Unfortunately Jake Averillo is in a similar situation, where he is not a halfback so please end this madness now and move him to the centres. If Baz has zero confidence in playing Flanagan then BBO is the person to slot in at half because next year the No.9 position is sorted and I would hate to lose a talent like BBO because we never looked after his playing future.
|
|
|
Mick O
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 1.8K,
Visits: 0
|
+xWe all know what a liability Okunbor is and I really hate bagging players out but he has to go. Unfortunately Jake Averillo is in a similar situation, where he is not a halfback so please end this madness now and move him to the centres. If Baz has zero confidence in playing Flanagan then BBO is the person to slot in at half because next year the No.9 position is sorted and I would hate to lose a talent like BBO because we never looked after his playing future. I’m starting to doubt BBO’s ability. Some of his passes from dummy half were shocking. The more he plays first grade the worst he looks. If anybody deserves a go at half it would be Wakeham.
|
|
|
hounddog
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 9.9K,
Visits: 0
|
+xWe all know what a liability Okunbor is and I really hate bagging players out but he has to go. Unfortunately Jake Averillo is in a similar situation, where he is not a halfback so please end this madness now and move him to the centres. If Baz has zero confidence in playing Flanagan then BBO is the person to slot in at half because next year the No.9 position is sorted and I would hate to lose a talent like BBO because we never looked after his playing future. IMO Averillo more deserving of a few more chances than Okunbor, he does some good things, just needs to cut down on the unforced errors and poor kicks. The viable options are Wakeham to 7. Or Duffty to 7 and Averillo / Credence to fullback. For now the 14 role suits BBO and his form doesn't deserve any more minutes. Even Okunbor kept his spot this week (so far). I'm happy for Baz to make minimal changes. Burto even stuffs up the odd pass, the halves handle the ball a lot and the opposition try to rush them, the odd error isn't unusual. That round 2 performance is our best effort for at least 5 years, We need more of the same.
|
|
|
hounddog
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 9.9K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+xWe all know what a liability Okunbor is and I really hate bagging players out but he has to go. Unfortunately Jake Averillo is in a similar situation, where he is not a halfback so please end this madness now and move him to the centres. If Baz has zero confidence in playing Flanagan then BBO is the person to slot in at half because next year the No.9 position is sorted and I would hate to lose a talent like BBO because we never looked after his playing future. I’m starting to doubt BBO’s ability. Some of his passes from dummy half were shocking. The more he plays first grade the worst he looks. If anybody deserves a go at half it would be Wakeham. Agreed. Wakeham had a dynamic running game in reserve grade, he has always had it. If he gets another chance at NRL he needs to play the same way. BBO is still young, as an impact 14, he is a good fit, though I wouldn't mind seeing Wakes get a crack at it. BBO needs 40-50 games of NRL like most young players, then we cssn judge his potential. Too young / inexperienced to play regular NRL in the halves IMO. The next step for him is to turn a game off the bench in 14, he has the potential to do that. When he gets on a roll 2 quick tries, perhaps with a slice of luck are possible, a few dumb plays are also possible. For BBO, do we put him on when leading by 6 with 7 minutes to play? I say no, not unless JMK is out of gas.
|
|
|
Mick O
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 1.8K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+xWe all know what a liability Okunbor is and I really hate bagging players out but he has to go. Unfortunately Jake Averillo is in a similar situation, where he is not a halfback so please end this madness now and move him to the centres. If Baz has zero confidence in playing Flanagan then BBO is the person to slot in at half because next year the No.9 position is sorted and I would hate to lose a talent like BBO because we never looked after his playing future. I’m starting to doubt BBO’s ability. Some of his passes from dummy half were shocking. The more he plays first grade the worst he looks. If anybody deserves a go at half it would be Wakeham. Agreed. Wakeham had a dynamic running game in reserve grade, he has always had it. If he gets another chance at NRL he needs to play the same way. BBO is still young, as an impact 14, he is a good fit, though I wouldn't mind seeing Wakes get a crack at it. BBO needs 40-50 games of NRL like most young players, then we cssn judge his potential. Too young / inexperienced to play regular NRL in the halves IMO. The next step for him is to turn a game off the bench in 14, he has the potential to do that. When he gets on a roll 2 quick tries, perhaps with a slice of luck are possible, a few dumb plays are also possible. For BBO, do we put him on when leading by 6 with 7 minutes to play? I say no, not unless JMK is out of gas. Happy with BBO at 14 but he certainly could use a run in reserves to improve his game. Wakeham should be given his role eventually just to see if their is any improvement. It also gives us the chance to play him in the halves if we are in front or behind by plenty.
Avo is worth persisting with at seven. To be fair anybody that just stays out of the way and gives Burto the ball quickly is the best 7 for us.
I knew Burto was going to be good. I am struggling to believe he is as good as he is already. He is a chance at winning the 5/8th of the year or next. Possibly the Dally M next year or within three.
|
|
|
ODF
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 2.3K,
Visits: 0
|
We don't have another year to "waste" Barrett knew who was coming to the squad this year and should have been getting players he wanted in position to compliment them last year. With all the fvcking around trying out players out of position I can see another year wasted. Baz should have had this sorted and trying out blokes to work positions, with Kiks and Mahoney coming next year.
|
|
|
ODF
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 2.3K,
Visits: 0
|
Also I think the coaching position is gonski. The persistance of okunbor will be the nail in the coffin. Tom however-you-spell Trbo will lose his title this weekend. Him and Saab will be blasting that fast and often past him, he will be spinning faster than a fully spooled up Garrett T35
|
|
|
Marki
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 6.7K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+xWe all know what a liability Okunbor is and I really hate bagging players out but he has to go. Unfortunately Jake Averillo is in a similar situation, where he is not a halfback so please end this madness now and move him to the centres. If Baz has zero confidence in playing Flanagan then BBO is the person to slot in at half because next year the No.9 position is sorted and I would hate to lose a talent like BBO because we never looked after his playing future. I’m starting to doubt BBO’s ability. Some of his passes from dummy half were shocking. The more he plays first grade the worst he looks. If anybody deserves a go at half it would be Wakeham. Agreed. Wakeham had a dynamic running game in reserve grade, he has always had it. If he gets another chance at NRL he needs to play the same way. BBO is still young, as an impact 14, he is a good fit, though I wouldn't mind seeing Wakes get a crack at it. BBO needs 40-50 games of NRL like most young players, then we cssn judge his potential. Too young / inexperienced to play regular NRL in the halves IMO. The next step for him is to turn a game off the bench in 14, he has the potential to do that. When he gets on a roll 2 quick tries, perhaps with a slice of luck are possible, a few dumb plays are also possible. For BBO, do we put him on when leading by 6 with 7 minutes to play? I say no, not unless JMK is out of gas. 40-50 games? Really? 3 years? In my opinion, if you have had 10 games where you have played min 50mins and you haven't proven yourself as a first grader, you are on the B list. I'm of the opinion that players who have consistently looked the goods in reserve grade, should get a crack at first grade at some stage this year. Lets face it, we arent going to win the thing this year. So if we get to back end of year and are out of contention, or if 1st graders are well down on form, we need to give the fringe reserves a crack. A real crack. Either starting role or off the bench but play significant minutes (50).
|
|
|
dman2018
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 8.7K,
Visits: 0
|
+xAlso I think the coaching position is gonski. The persistance of okunbor will be the nail in the coffin. Tom however-you-spell Trbo will lose his title this weekend. Him and Saab will be blasting that fast and often past him, he will be spinning faster than a fully spooled up Garrett T35 I'm stunned OK gets another shot this week... It's rhe same crap the past two weeks for which Villi used to blame Dutchy... Chopper and Hoff are on the extended bench so I guess we can hope for a change on Friday...
|
|
|
hounddog
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 9.9K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+xWe all know what a liability Okunbor is and I really hate bagging players out but he has to go. Unfortunately Jake Averillo is in a similar situation, where he is not a halfback so please end this madness now and move him to the centres. If Baz has zero confidence in playing Flanagan then BBO is the person to slot in at half because next year the No.9 position is sorted and I would hate to lose a talent like BBO because we never looked after his playing future. I’m starting to doubt BBO’s ability. Some of his passes from dummy half were shocking. The more he plays first grade the worst he looks. If anybody deserves a go at half it would be Wakeham. Agreed. Wakeham had a dynamic running game in reserve grade, he has always had it. If he gets another chance at NRL he needs to play the same way. BBO is still young, as an impact 14, he is a good fit, though I wouldn't mind seeing Wakes get a crack at it. BBO needs 40-50 games of NRL like most young players, then we cssn judge his potential. Too young / inexperienced to play regular NRL in the halves IMO. The next step for him is to turn a game off the bench in 14, he has the potential to do that. When he gets on a roll 2 quick tries, perhaps with a slice of luck are possible, a few dumb plays are also possible. For BBO, do we put him on when leading by 6 with 7 minutes to play? I say no, not unless JMK is out of gas. 40-50 games? Really? 3 years? In my opinion, if you have had 10 games where you have played min 50mins and you haven't proven yourself as a first grader, you are on the B list. I'm of the opinion that players who have consistently looked the goods in reserve grade, should get a crack at first grade at some stage this year. Lets face it, we arent going to win the thing this year. So if we get to back end of year and are out of contention, or if 1st graders are well down on form, we need to give the fringe reserves a crack. A real crack. Either starting role or off the bench but play significant minutes (50). The top 1% of players are an instant hit in the NRL after a handful of games. If you think we have any chance of an NRL squad composed of the top 1% of players, well good luck with that. The Panthers had Jimmy Maloney around while Cleary was learning the ropes, no doubt Cleary is in the top 1%. Was Cleary an instant hit after 10 games? Why didn't the Panthers team up Cleary and Luai on day 1 when they had played together in the lower grades? The answer is simple thrown into NRL together Cleary and Luai would have strugged, sometimes that is a great way to kill off a talented young player. See Luke Brooks and Mitch Moses, were they consistent from day 1? Is Brooks a player who's NRL career has gone backwards in a big way?
|
|
|
hounddog
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 9.9K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+xAlso I think the coaching position is gonski. The persistance of okunbor will be the nail in the coffin. Tom however-you-spell Trbo will lose his title this weekend. Him and Saab will be blasting that fast and often past him, he will be spinning faster than a fully spooled up Garrett T35 I'm stunned OK gets another shot this week... It's rhe same crap the past two weeks for which Villi used to blame Dutchy... Chopper and Hoff are on the extended bench so I guess we can hope for a change on Friday... 50/50 there is a late change.
|
|
|
hounddog
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 9.9K,
Visits: 0
|
Speaking of Villi, I strongly suspect some attractive female dominatrix has him locked up in a cellar.
Don't be a fool an escape quickly like I did.
|
|
|
Mick O
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 1.8K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+x+xWe all know what a liability Okunbor is and I really hate bagging players out but he has to go. Unfortunately Jake Averillo is in a similar situation, where he is not a halfback so please end this madness now and move him to the centres. If Baz has zero confidence in playing Flanagan then BBO is the person to slot in at half because next year the No.9 position is sorted and I would hate to lose a talent like BBO because we never looked after his playing future. I’m starting to doubt BBO’s ability. Some of his passes from dummy half were shocking. The more he plays first grade the worst he looks. If anybody deserves a go at half it would be Wakeham. Agreed. Wakeham had a dynamic running game in reserve grade, he has always had it. If he gets another chance at NRL he needs to play the same way. BBO is still young, as an impact 14, he is a good fit, though I wouldn't mind seeing Wakes get a crack at it. BBO needs 40-50 games of NRL like most young players, then we cssn judge his potential. Too young / inexperienced to play regular NRL in the halves IMO. The next step for him is to turn a game off the bench in 14, he has the potential to do that. When he gets on a roll 2 quick tries, perhaps with a slice of luck are possible, a few dumb plays are also possible. For BBO, do we put him on when leading by 6 with 7 minutes to play? I say no, not unless JMK is out of gas. 40-50 games? Really? 3 years? In my opinion, if you have had 10 games where you have played min 50mins and you haven't proven yourself as a first grader, you are on the B list. I'm of the opinion that players who have consistently looked the goods in reserve grade, should get a crack at first grade at some stage this year. Lets face it, we arent going to win the thing this year. So if we get to back end of year and are out of contention, or if 1st graders are well down on form, we need to give the fringe reserves a crack. A real crack. Either starting role or off the bench but play significant minutes (50). The top 1% of players are an instant hit in the NRL after a handful of games. If you think we have any chance of an NRL squad composed of the top 1% of players, well good luck with that. The Panthers had Jimmy Maloney around while Cleary was learning the ropes, no doubt Cleary is in the top 1%. Was Cleary an instant hit after 10 games? Why didn't the Panthers team up Cleary and Luai on day 1 when they had played together in the lower grades? The answer is simple thrown into NRL together Cleary and Luai would have strugged, sometimes that is a great way to kill off a talented young player. See Luke Brooks and Mitch Moses, were they consistent from day 1? Is Brooks a player who's NRL career has gone backwards in a big way? Exactly. The difference in playing reserve grade and first grade is enormous. It’s the main reason we went after an experienced halfback to help Burto. Unfortunately we missed out.
|
|
|
Marki
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 6.7K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+x+xWe all know what a liability Okunbor is and I really hate bagging players out but he has to go. Unfortunately Jake Averillo is in a similar situation, where he is not a halfback so please end this madness now and move him to the centres. If Baz has zero confidence in playing Flanagan then BBO is the person to slot in at half because next year the No.9 position is sorted and I would hate to lose a talent like BBO because we never looked after his playing future. I’m starting to doubt BBO’s ability. Some of his passes from dummy half were shocking. The more he plays first grade the worst he looks. If anybody deserves a go at half it would be Wakeham. Agreed. Wakeham had a dynamic running game in reserve grade, he has always had it. If he gets another chance at NRL he needs to play the same way. BBO is still young, as an impact 14, he is a good fit, though I wouldn't mind seeing Wakes get a crack at it. BBO needs 40-50 games of NRL like most young players, then we cssn judge his potential. Too young / inexperienced to play regular NRL in the halves IMO. The next step for him is to turn a game off the bench in 14, he has the potential to do that. When he gets on a roll 2 quick tries, perhaps with a slice of luck are possible, a few dumb plays are also possible. For BBO, do we put him on when leading by 6 with 7 minutes to play? I say no, not unless JMK is out of gas. 40-50 games? Really? 3 years? In my opinion, if you have had 10 games where you have played min 50mins and you haven't proven yourself as a first grader, you are on the B list. I'm of the opinion that players who have consistently looked the goods in reserve grade, should get a crack at first grade at some stage this year. Lets face it, we arent going to win the thing this year. So if we get to back end of year and are out of contention, or if 1st graders are well down on form, we need to give the fringe reserves a crack. A real crack. Either starting role or off the bench but play significant minutes (50). The top 1% of players are an instant hit in the NRL after a handful of games. If you think we have any chance of an NRL squad composed of the top 1% of players, well good luck with that. The Panthers had Jimmy Maloney around while Cleary was learning the ropes, no doubt Cleary is in the top 1%. Was Cleary an instant hit after 10 games? Why didn't the Panthers team up Cleary and Luai on day 1 when they had played together in the lower grades? The answer is simple thrown into NRL together Cleary and Luai would have strugged, sometimes that is a great way to kill off a talented young player. See Luke Brooks and Mitch Moses, were they consistent from day 1? Is Brooks a player who's NRL career has gone backwards in a big way? I wasn't talking about players reaching their peak. I was talking about how many games before you consider them first graders. I can usually tell after only a couple of games but thought I might say 10 so I don't get ridiculed. If you need 40-50 games to figure out if you have it or not, then you don't. Maybe change clubs and see if the environment brings out something better in you.
|
|
|
Mick O
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 1.8K,
Visits: 0
|
+xWe don't have another year to "waste" Barrett knew who was coming to the squad this year and should have been getting players he wanted in position to compliment them last year. With all the fvcking around trying out players out of position I can see another year wasted. Baz should have had this sorted and trying out blokes to work positions, with Kiks and Mahoney coming next year. I don’t think this year is going to be wasted. But it’s certainly not a year we look like a real chance to win the comp. So we certainly should be using this year to play players in positions that aren’t locked down in the future. Halfback and fullback. At least two outside back spots. And an edge and middle.
I also would like to give a number of the players a number if games to see if they can cement their spots. Ok did receive some criticism and probably should be replaced. But if we have nobody better it’s best to persist with him. At least he offers us good meters at the back. Avo needs more time as well and should be looking to push the pass to Burto whenever he calls as early as possible. It may take him a while but he does have the ability. Waddell on the edge and TPJ in the middle have been a great success. In time we may be surprised by others.
Also if we make too many changes already we will lack cohesion. The team needs time to learn. They need to be kept together with very few preferably no changes to build unity.
This year is going to be fun to watch.
|
|
|
hounddog
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 9.9K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+xWe don't have another year to "waste" Barrett knew who was coming to the squad this year and should have been getting players he wanted in position to compliment them last year. With all the fvcking around trying out players out of position I can see another year wasted. Baz should have had this sorted and trying out blokes to work positions, with Kiks and Mahoney coming next year. I don’t think this year is going to be wasted. But it’s certainly not a year we look like a real chance to win the comp. So we certainly should be using this year to play players in positions that aren’t locked down in the future. Halfback and fullback. At least two outside back spots. And an edge and middle.
I also would like to give a number of the players a number if games to see if they can cement their spots. Ok did receive some criticism and probably should be replaced. But if we have nobody better it’s best to persist with him. At least he offers us good meters at the back. Avo needs more time as well and should be looking to push the pass to Burto whenever he calls as early as possible. It may take him a while but he does have the ability. Waddell on the edge and TPJ in the middle have been a great success. In time we may be surprised by others.
Also if we make too many changes already we will lack cohesion. The team needs time to learn. They need to be kept together with very few preferably no changes to build unity.
This year is going to be fun to watch.
This year is about building confidence and combinations, also finding the right players for some positions and determining where we need to sign more players. I think that the game against the Broncs was a good indication of how the season will go. We played well but were beaten by a slightly better / luckier side. Except for the top 3-4 sides we should be in most games. We should win 40-55% of games. Most likely finish 8th-10th. If true that is a big step forward in on season. If it all comes together this week, maybe we can finish even higher. Just seeing the team competing and playing fairly well is a breath of fresh air. Fans who think we are going to win the comp each year are often disappointed. Better to be surprised by better than expected results and we might be surprised.
|
|
|
Mick O
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 1.8K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+xWe don't have another year to "waste" Barrett knew who was coming to the squad this year and should have been getting players he wanted in position to compliment them last year. With all the fvcking around trying out players out of position I can see another year wasted. Baz should have had this sorted and trying out blokes to work positions, with Kiks and Mahoney coming next year. I don’t think this year is going to be wasted. But it’s certainly not a year we look like a real chance to win the comp. So we certainly should be using this year to play players in positions that aren’t locked down in the future. Halfback and fullback. At least two outside back spots. And an edge and middle.
I also would like to give a number of the players a number if games to see if they can cement their spots. Ok did receive some criticism and probably should be replaced. But if we have nobody better it’s best to persist with him. At least he offers us good meters at the back. Avo needs more time as well and should be looking to push the pass to Burto whenever he calls as early as possible. It may take him a while but he does have the ability. Waddell on the edge and TPJ in the middle have been a great success. In time we may be surprised by others.
Also if we make too many changes already we will lack cohesion. The team needs time to learn. They need to be kept together with very few preferably no changes to build unity.
This year is going to be fun to watch.
This year is about building confidence and combinations, also finding the right players for some positions and determining where we need to sign more players. I think that the game against the Broncs was a good indication of how the season will go. We played well but were beaten by a slightly better / luckier side. Except for the top 3-4 sides we should be in most games. We should win 40-55% of games. Most likely finish 8th-10th. If true that is a big step forward in on season. If it all comes together this week, maybe we can finish even higher. Just seeing the team competing and playing fairly well is a breath of fresh air. Fans who think we are going to win the comp each year are often disappointed. Better to be surprised by better than expected results and we might be surprised. Exactly.
The next three weeks will be very interesting going forward. Win or lose isn’t too important. But if we are scoring plenty of points and conceding few it is the turn around we need to be successful.
Win more than one out of three over the next three weeks we are playing finals. We might get lucky playing finals. But it’s more important to build the team and set us up long term.
I would rather be a top four team for the next decade than chop and change and make it occasionally
|
|
|
dman2018
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 8.7K,
Visits: 0
|
Love a good MSM narrative... "Sharks could've been 2 from 2 and leading the comp"... They couldve easily have been 0 from 2...
|
|
|
dman2018
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 8.7K,
Visits: 0
|
This 'with force' interpretation is absolute crap.. it's either illegal or not... Subjective measures of force is asinine...
|
|
|
Mick O
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 1.8K,
Visits: 0
|
Wish we could defend like Cronulla
|
|
|
dman2018
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 8.7K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+x+x+xWe all know what a liability Okunbor is and I really hate bagging players out but he has to go. Unfortunately Jake Averillo is in a similar situation, where he is not a halfback so please end this madness now and move him to the centres. If Baz has zero confidence in playing Flanagan then BBO is the person to slot in at half because next year the No.9 position is sorted and I would hate to lose a talent like BBO because we never looked after his playing future. I’m starting to doubt BBO’s ability. Some of his passes from dummy half were shocking. The more he plays first grade the worst he looks. If anybody deserves a go at half it would be Wakeham. Agreed. Wakeham had a dynamic running game in reserve grade, he has always had it. If he gets another chance at NRL he needs to play the same way. BBO is still young, as an impact 14, he is a good fit, though I wouldn't mind seeing Wakes get a crack at it. BBO needs 40-50 games of NRL like most young players, then we cssn judge his potential. Too young / inexperienced to play regular NRL in the halves IMO. The next step for him is to turn a game off the bench in 14, he has the potential to do that. When he gets on a roll 2 quick tries, perhaps with a slice of luck are possible, a few dumb plays are also possible. For BBO, do we put him on when leading by 6 with 7 minutes to play? I say no, not unless JMK is out of gas. 40-50 games? Really? 3 years? In my opinion, if you have had 10 games where you have played min 50mins and you haven't proven yourself as a first grader, you are on the B list. I'm of the opinion that players who have consistently looked the goods in reserve grade, should get a crack at first grade at some stage this year. Lets face it, we arent going to win the thing this year. So if we get to back end of year and are out of contention, or if 1st graders are well down on form, we need to give the fringe reserves a crack. A real crack. Either starting role or off the bench but play significant minutes (50). The top 1% of players are an instant hit in the NRL after a handful of games. If you think we have any chance of an NRL squad composed of the top 1% of players, well good luck with that. The Panthers had Jimmy Maloney around while Cleary was learning the ropes, no doubt Cleary is in the top 1%. Was Cleary an instant hit after 10 games? Why didn't the Panthers team up Cleary and Luai on day 1 when they had played together in the lower grades? The answer is simple thrown into NRL together Cleary and Luai would have strugged, sometimes that is a great way to kill off a talented young player. See Luke Brooks and Mitch Moses, were they consistent from day 1? Is Brooks a player who's NRL career has gone backwards in a big way? I can usually tell after only a couple of games but thought I might say 10 so I don't get ridiculed. 299 games later... "Tolman is shit"...
|
|
|
dman2018
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 8.7K,
Visits: 0
|
+xWish we could defend like Cronulla You mean let twice as many trys in in the first two weeks???...
|
|
|
dman2018
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 8.7K,
Visits: 0
|
Ziggy a better ref than any Cummins.... Ever...
|
|
|