|
dman2018
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 8.7K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+xStill a winnable game, we need to win it with our defence. #GoDogs Unfortunately the NRL will instruct the Refs to get Souths back into the match anyway possible .. He will be cautioned for sending the Souths player into the sin bin... We don’t need the refs intervention for us to capitulate in the second 40... We’ve done it nearly all year...
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
dman2018
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 8.7K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+xSix again six again, penalty, and give a try without going upstairs and its a no try. I've always said EVERY single try should be checked by video. But traditionalists want less intervention with more horrendous errors like that. Broncos and Dogs games would have more time spent on reviews than playing with the amount of tries against them/us... And then they’d fvck 20% of them up anyway...
|
|
|
|
|
Marki
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 6.7K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+xSix again six again, penalty, and give a try without going upstairs and its a no try. I've always said EVERY single try should be checked by video. But traditionalists want less intervention with more horrendous errors like that. Yeah but they get them wrong when they go up there anyway... The Souths no-try was not a Penalty... It was a 50-50. Hand went into JMK = instant penalty. The problem is not on video rer getting 50-50calls wrong. It's on the rules not allowing glaring errors to be corrected by a video review that happens anyway. They reviewed Hoppa vs winger on the touch one-goal 7 tackle set so why not intervene on such a glaring error that results in points of all things?
|
|
|
|
|
Kamaryn
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 3.6K,
Visits: 0
|
The most annoying thing is people will say the no-try was a square up. Personally I think it was a penalty but even if it wasn't they wouldn't have had all that momentum if the first try was correctly disallowed.
League is a game of momentum. You shouldn't have to overcome horrible decisions like that to win a game.
|
|
|
|
|
Villi
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 3.1K,
Visits: 0
|
+xStill a winnable game, we need to win it with our defence. #GoDogs Groundhog Day.... Dogs look like top 8 contenders to start the game.... then something goes against us.... then we crumble & lose Up 20-0.... we lose this, it’ll be a new low for the club.
They’ve got to win it.... at least for their bloody captain!!
JO defensively is useless, but he’s 100% better than the useless crap Montoya & Holland. British Dog has been good.
|
|
|
|
|
Marki
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 6.7K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+xStill a winnable game, we need to win it with our defence. #GoDogs We've lost the "kicking out of danger" from Lewis. Last time we had a similar situation (I think Raiders game) and Foran and other half couldbt get us out of trouble. We are making better metres running the ball out but the loss of Lewis' kicking game is huge. I really think we need to get to 32 points and then hope we defend well. Hope they can do it for Jackson in his 200th. Wakeham and Averillo don't have lomg kicks, they do have more footy. Wakeham is either extremely badly positioned for 5th tackle kick or Souths are reading him receiving the ball too well. He is only just getting boot to ball.
|
|
|
|
|
dman2018
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 8.7K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+xSix again six again, penalty, and give a try without going upstairs and its a no try. I've always said EVERY single try should be checked by video. But traditionalists want less intervention with more horrendous errors like that. Yeah but they get them wrong when they go up there anyway... The Souths no-try was not a Penalty... It was a 50-50. Hand went into JMK = instant penalty. The problem is not on video rer getting 50-50calls wrong. It's on the rules not allowing glaring errors to be corrected by a video review that happens anyway. They reviewed Hoppa vs winger on the touch one-goal 7 tackle set so why not intervene on such a glaring error that results in points of all things? They get obvious things wrong... The 50/50 calls are the way ones for them cos they get to stick with the onfield decision... The Souths bloke changed direction with the ball, it wasn’t a push in the back...
|
|
|
|
|
dman2018
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 8.7K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+x+xSix again six again, penalty, and give a try without going upstairs and its a no try. I've always said EVERY single try should be checked by video. But traditionalists want less intervention with more horrendous errors like that. Yeah but they get them wrong when they go up there anyway... The Souths no-try was not a Penalty... It was a 50-50. Hand went into JMK = instant penalty. The problem is not on video rer getting 50-50calls wrong. It's on the rules not allowing glaring errors to be corrected by a video review that happens anyway. They reviewed Hoppa vs winger on the touch one-goal 7 tackle set so why not intervene on such a glaring error that results in points of all things? They get obvious things wrong... The 50/50 calls are the way ones for them cos they get to stick with the onfield decision... The Souths bloke changed direction with the ball, it wasn’t a push in the back... *the easy ones
|
|
|
|
|
Villi
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 3.1K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+xStill a winnable game, we need to win it with our defence. #GoDogs We've lost the "kicking out of danger" from Lewis. Last time we had a similar situation (I think Raiders game) and Foran and other half couldbt get us out of trouble. We are making better metres running the ball out but the loss of Lewis' kicking game is huge. I really think we need to get to 32 points and then hope we defend well. Hope they can do it for Jackson in his 200th. Wakeham and Averillo don't have lomg kicks, they do have more footy. Wakeham is either extremely badly positioned for 5th tackle kick or Souths are reading him receiving the ball too well. He is only just getting boot to ball. It’s called poor coaching Marki.... anyone with half a brain should have trained this kid to be positioned deeper or whatever when he gets his kick away.... I’m expecting more shanks by him before full time unfortunately & the usual Benny Hill blooper that’ll probably lead to a Souths try
|
|
|
|
|
Marki
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 6.7K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+x+xSix again six again, penalty, and give a try without going upstairs and its a no try. I've always said EVERY single try should be checked by video. But traditionalists want less intervention with more horrendous errors like that. Yeah but they get them wrong when they go up there anyway... The Souths no-try was not a Penalty... It was a 50-50. Hand went into JMK = instant penalty. The problem is not on video rer getting 50-50calls wrong. It's on the rules not allowing glaring errors to be corrected by a video review that happens anyway. They reviewed Hoppa vs winger on the touch one-goal 7 tackle set so why not intervene on such a glaring error that results in points of all things? They get obvious things wrong... The 50/50 calls are the way ones for them cos they get to stick with the onfield decision... The Souths bloke changed direction with the ball, it wasn’t a push in the back... I personally saw it the way you did, but any hand in the back is a penalty when the defensive player misses the ball like that and falls. We copped 1 or 2 earlier in season. My fear here is we are likely to let a 20 point lead slip. I really hope we can score first in second half otherwise we are finished.
|
|
|
|
|
dogdoctor
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 79,
Visits: 0
|
we have lost these before becuse
1. we go one out of our line - change this
2. we forget to attack - george tel l Averillo and wakeham to play football and take charge
3. we lack a cool headed game manager???? see number 2
|
|
|
|
|
Marki
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 6.7K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+x+xStill a winnable game, we need to win it with our defence. #GoDogs We've lost the "kicking out of danger" from Lewis. Last time we had a similar situation (I think Raiders game) and Foran and other half couldbt get us out of trouble. We are making better metres running the ball out but the loss of Lewis' kicking game is huge. I really think we need to get to 32 points and then hope we defend well. Hope they can do it for Jackson in his 200th. Wakeham and Averillo don't have lomg kicks, they do have more footy. Wakeham is either extremely badly positioned for 5th tackle kick or Souths are reading him receiving the ball too well. He is only just getting boot to ball. It’s called poor coaching Marki.... anyone with half a brain should have trained this kid to be positioned deeper or whatever when he gets his kick away.... I’m expecting more shanks by him before full time unfortunately & the usual Benny Hill blooper that’ll probably lead to a Souths try If its not that, it will be someone throwing an intercept to a Johnston, Graham or Cody Walker....
|
|
|
|
|
Marki
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 6.7K,
Visits: 0
|
+xwe have lost these before becuse 1. we go one out of our line - change this 2. we forget to attack - george tel l Averillo and wakeham to play football and take charge 3. we lack a cool headed game manager???? see number 2 For whatever reason I would have felt more comfortable with us being 20 points down rather than 10 points up......
|
|
|
|
|
dman2018
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 8.7K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+x+x+xSix again six again, penalty, and give a try without going upstairs and its a no try. I've always said EVERY single try should be checked by video. But traditionalists want less intervention with more horrendous errors like that. Yeah but they get them wrong when they go up there anyway... The Souths no-try was not a Penalty... It was a 50-50. Hand went into JMK = instant penalty. The problem is not on video rer getting 50-50calls wrong. It's on the rules not allowing glaring errors to be corrected by a video review that happens anyway. They reviewed Hoppa vs winger on the touch one-goal 7 tackle set so why not intervene on such a glaring error that results in points of all things? They get obvious things wrong... The 50/50 calls are the way ones for them cos they get to stick with the onfield decision... The Souths bloke changed direction with the ball, it wasn’t a push in the back... I personally saw it the way you did, but any hand in the back is a penalty when the defensive player misses the ball like that and falls. We copped 1 or 2 earlier in season. My fear here is we are likely to let a 20 point lead slip. I really hope we can score first in second half otherwise we are finished. There’s a difference between a hand on the back and a push... I’ll show ya if you like... ;) I didn’t think it at the time but Kam did mention a square up... I just thought yep... the bunkers still shit...
Vlan the Man still got his work cut out for him getting the refs off the public’s radar when they have as little feel for the game or understanding of rugby league nuance as they do...
|
|
|
|
|
ODF
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 2.3K,
Visits: 0
|
WTF why are we waiting for them and then let them get an offload away. Really dumb footy.
|
|
|
|
|
ODF
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 2.3K,
Visits: 0
|
Though the bunnies gave had a motza of possession in the second half so far.
|
|
|
|
|
Marki
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 6.7K,
Visits: 0
|
+xThough the bunnies gave had a motza of possession in the second half so far. It's impossible to win against percentage footy. Yet we are gifting them the territory to put us away.
|
|
|
|
|
Villi
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 3.1K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+x+xStill a winnable game, we need to win it with our defence. #GoDogs We've lost the "kicking out of danger" from Lewis. Last time we had a similar situation (I think Raiders game) and Foran and other half couldbt get us out of trouble. We are making better metres running the ball out but the loss of Lewis' kicking game is huge. I really think we need to get to 32 points and then hope we defend well. Hope they can do it for Jackson in his 200th. Wakeham and Averillo don't have lomg kicks, they do have more footy. Wakeham is either extremely badly positioned for 5th tackle kick or Souths are reading him receiving the ball too well. He is only just getting boot to ball. It’s called poor coaching Marki.... anyone with half a brain should have trained this kid to be positioned deeper or whatever when he gets his kick away.... I’m expecting more shanks by him before full time unfortunately & the usual Benny Hill blooper that’ll probably lead to a Souths try 2 of Wakeham kicks have lead to Souths running 50m downfield
|
|
|
|
|
Marki
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 6.7K,
Visits: 0
|
Woohoo!
The football gods shined upon us tonight!
So did Jackos 200th game which spared him 2 100% sin bins
|
|
|
|
|
hounddog
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 9.9K,
Visits: 0
|
Yeah a win, overall we deserved it.
|
|
|
|
|
Villi
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 3.1K,
Visits: 0
|
Well bloody done boys..... well done!!!
|
|
|
|
|
Marki
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 6.7K,
Visits: 0
|
+xWell bloody done boys..... well done!!! They'll party this one all night. Everyone except Lewis who is probably still in gaga land.
|
|
|
|
|
Marki
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 6.7K,
Visits: 0
|
The Hoppa high shot that saved a try plus the 2 try savers by Jacko and the ensuing 2 tremendous acts of leniency from the ref to not sim bin Jacko were telling!
|
|
|
|
|
dman2018
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 8.7K,
Visits: 0
|
See ya at your local Laundys establishment!!!.,,
|
|
|
|
|
Villi
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 3.1K,
Visits: 0
|
+xSee ya at your local Laundys establishment!!!.,, Do they serve Sambucca?
|
|
|
|
|
Villi
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 3.1K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+xWell bloody done boys..... well done!!! They'll party this one all night. Everyone except Lewis who is probably still in gaga land. Lewis’s grogginess reminds me of Dman at about 11pm each night
|
|
|
|
|
Marki
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 6.7K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+xWell bloody done boys..... well done!!! They'll party this one all night. Everyone except Lewis who is probably still in gaga land. Lewis’s grogginess reminds me of Dman at about 11pm each night PM or AM?
|
|
|
|
|
Villi
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 3.1K,
Visits: 0
|
Hoppa redeemed himself tonight with 2 try savers!
One with his foot, the other the rake out
|
|
|
|
|
Zef
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 2.1K,
Visits: 0
|
Better than a root!
|
|
|
|
|
hounddog
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 9.9K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+xWell bloody done boys..... well done!!! They'll party this one all night. Everyone except Lewis who is probably still in gaga land. Lewis’s grogginess reminds me of Dman at about 11pm each night PM or AM? Both infact 24/7... except christmas day ... his liver has a day off.
|
|
|
|