https://twitter.com/7Cricket/status/1209980903159545856?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw%7Ctwcamp%5Etweetembed%7Ctwterm%5E1209982305131016192&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Fau.sports.yahoo.com%2Fboxing-day-test-joe-burns-golden-duck-trent-boult-ricky-ponting-commentator-curse-000733744.html

Here is the replay. Burns has a straight bat face - he is playing straight down the ground, at expected strike point, the ball just came back in after being delivered accross, and he is playing down the wrong line. Burns is playing for it to straighten, cos he knew it was swinging, but it did more than straighten, it changed directions on pitching. There's not much a batsman can do there. You play for that level of swing and seam deviation normally, you are going to nick off a lot when the ball ball doesn't deviate. You bring your legs over, you're plumb lbw.

Hope Swepson kicks on. 

We we need some more back up spinners. 

I think he has 12 wickets at 26 runs from 5 games. 

Good explanatory post, Baggers. 

You know my views on Santner KW. How is he even playing Test cricket. Frankly I dont like watching him bowl with his odd lobbing action. I did see Smithy drop kick him over the long off fence tho.

Mitchell Swepson is in the squad.. likely to play in Sydney.

I don’t know enough about bowling to discuss seam position, but if Test players struggle at times with it, it must be difficult to impart the ball to its maximum effect consistently. 

Baggers elucidated the scrambled seam in another post. 

Gday Paddles,
jj- That's the point I was referring to,
Attacking with a drive first ball faced is a big? & has
to be asked "what was going on in his head to make such a decision"
Is this the mind set of a test opener, as it left the gate open first ball faced.
I really liked Burns selection, however I now have a ? over it as he keeps
having these rash moments.
I would still like to see him given time to grow into the position and also
question who is mentoring him over his mindset?

I questioned the selectors when they chose head but after labu I'm chastened as a couch expert!

 Head is on borrowed time. CA has intimated even to the public he needs to start converting.. He needs to stop throwing away his wicket when set. Burns is ok for the time being but with only a short series against the Banglas before India next summer he aint getting any chances to impress. You will find Joe has made those 4 centuries and 97 on flat tracks. He is not the same player on moving decks.

Yes grazor we may miss Hazlewood's metronomic seam on this grassy deck. It may turn to hay come the last two days.. 38 & 40 predicted.
I see the state of play at the end  of day 1 as just favoring us. We were sent in and we still have Smithy..who is back to his stonewalling best. Has no choice as the BC are using negative bowling tactics.  Head must be on his last chance..he really needs stay with Smith, bat time and ton up to prove to CA he can convert in difficult conditions. He got a solitary 50 from 8 innings in the Ashes and his last three Test innings have yielded 24,5,56.

Joe made it unplayable by looking to drive it. Needed the full face in defense. This is one flaw in Burn's makeup..his loose technique

yeah they were tight but the seem position wasn't great. When it was even the old ball moved quite a bit. Would have been interesting to see hazelwood on this ground!

Were you ready for a broken f**** arm? Wagner isn't bowling at people's heads like Johnson, Thommo, and Starc do and did. He aint bowling beamers like Brett Lee neither. He has set a field, and bowls short stuff. If the field wasn't set, it would be easy run scoring. 

Wagner hit Wade's head, cos he ducked into in the ball! Wade is a short man! These balls are not high. They're just not. They're just far to short to drive or leg glance. They are hip to shoulder. Hip to shoulder.

An anecdote from me, at high school in the nets, around 15/16 - if you wore a helmet, you got short stuff as fair game. If you didn't wear  a helmet - you didn't. We used to have these concrete half nets with astro turf - but if the bowler went short - it was off the natural baked turf. (if he bowler hit the ridge between the baked turf and the concrete with astro, well anything could happen tbh) So the speed of the bouncer was slower on the baked turf, but man it got high on you fast because you were literally batting on two different pitches at once. This is the critical difference. The astro would skid, fast and low. Easy batting. THe hard turf might have slowed it down, but suddenly the ball is at your head. It just would get so high seemingly so fast, even if slower off the turf. On game days, you play on one pitch, but these practice pitches were half and half. Just totally different surfaces. The rule was simple. You want to wear a helmet. You get bouncers if the bowler wanted. The school I went to even had full grass nets. The only school in Auckland if not entire of NZ to have those.  But def Auckland... We used to get intl teams (cricket and rugby) training on the school grounds all the time. But those half and half nets. Man they were a challenge. At 13 and 14, noone is bowling short stuff, at 15 and 16 - they are physically starting to be able to. And on a half and half net, my gawd. It was a challenge.

But Wagner is not bowling at the head. Stop sooking. And he's medium. He isn't breaking arms, cleaning out teeth, or doing damage like Mitch J 2013/14 or Thommo 74/75... 

He is a short medium pacer. Bowling under people's shoulders. And you're whinging....

Not that it matters, but in the 3.5 years of him doing this, Aussies are the first moaners about. Not even England whinged. 2 series vs them. SA - fine with it. They did it to everyone at home anyway with MMork, Olivier and Ngidi. Asian teams - no issues. Just Aussie fans with an issue with it. I hope they hated Mitch J and Lillee and THommo more for bowling at heads.

Terrible.

Labu and Smith treated him with sheer and utter disdain. 

He was pulled from the attack rather swiftly.

Hopefully he will be dropped for Syndey - finally.

Mark Waugh doesn't seem to realise this, but NZ's premier spinners are in fact;

Will Sommerville and Ajaz Patel, who have spun NZ to wins in Asia vs SL and Pak. 

Astle is also a better wicket taking bowler than Santner. 

The Santner selection has been upsetting many kiwi fans for a while now. Before Perth. BEFORE PERTH. 

He got an unplayable ball today. Just really unlucky. It was a total jaffa. It was swinging back in, as you can expect with Boult and a new ball, but despite all the swing, I am sure it seamed in off the pitch as well. it seemed to jag back. Watch a replay. Balls like that - they don't even reveal techincal faults. That was the perfect ball. Boult will bowl a ball that good, 1 every thousand balls. To get that line, pitch, swing, to get the nibble off the pitch, it was just a jaffa.  Those are the ones you wish you get Kohli or Smith with. Not have them wasted on Burns tbh.

I've never seen you post anything like this before, Grazor! 

Head has an average of 40  so is doing better than I though he was. 

Burns has about 4 centuries and a 97, but seems to get out for quite a few low scores too.

Yes, and world cricket still permits 150km/h bowlers to bowl balls at head height. Its not been a safety issue - it used to be an intimidation issue, but that only covered the head high stuff. Not elbows and ribs.

Wagner is bowling under the shoulders, its not head high stuff, and the Aussie batsmen seem to be okay wearing them on the back, gloves, elbow etc.

I'm sure facing Mitch Johnson, Jeff Thomson, DK Lillee all would have been much scarier and unsafe for batsmen. 

Leg theory is a legitimate theory, its not bodyline at the head with no helmet and 4 down in fine leg, these balls are at a heaight to pull IN FRONT OF SQUARE, they only at Wade's elbow.

The batsman already has the head high bouncer rule, only 2 behind square, the batsman has all the rule changes in his favour. Wagner has just found a way to succeed within these rules, and I expect more bowlers to copy him globally.

Why should Wagner be forced to bowl length outside off? Its cricket, not baseball. We don't need a strike zone. We have a crease. :P If Wagnerline need a rule change, just get rid of all bouncers ever. And place a speed cap on fast bowlers bowling too fast, cos that is scary and people could get injured and hurt. A 140km/h speed limit would improve player safety a lot.

I will check - but I dont think Wagner has ever retired hurt any batsman ever. Walsh had lots.. Akhtar, Roberts, all have more than a few... Thommo and Lillee of course. Marshall famously sconned many. Thommo said this 



https://cricket.yahoo.net/news/10-times-bowler-knocked-batsman-154738602

I dont think NZC need to worry about Wagner's legacy in the world game ;)

Missed a lot of the day's play.

Did anyone see Santner bowl?

How did he go on a first day MCG pitch?

The Kiwis tightened up in the second hour.

Heck of a cricketer, CDG.

Not much of a team-mate!

Yeah - Dutchie is very popular with NZ test fans. He is a viable new ball option too. Gets swing and nibble.

Before this series he averaged under 30 with the ball and over 40 with the bat, with the highest sr in the history of test cricket, more than Afridi!~

Most of the world does not notice CdG...

I think 4-250 odd is a reasonable day's return for a team put in.


Not a bad day for Aus. The Kiwis stuck to their task too.

I'm quite a fan of De Grandhomme. He would  be a handy number six for us. I'm not sure of his batting average?  He bowls a lot of tight, accurate, clever balls in a day with a lovely,  seven pace run easy action  that takes nothing out of him. 

Without Ferguson, they aren't really a serious threat.

It seems that Wagner bowls very accurate short balls and seems to hit the pitch hard for a bowler of moderate pace. So many of his balls need to be played.  Conversely, our quicker bowlers, often bowl short balls that don't need to be played or over head high at speeds of 135 - 145kph.

lol

It was a beauty bowled by Boult!

Interesting thoughts, JJ. 

Regarding Burns he has played at least one huge innings this summer. 

When he gets in he he seems to go on and score big. 

If the pitch was truer, I’d expect more players to hook and pull Wagner. 

I was impressed with Wagner and De Grandhomme’s bowling. 

Interesting view, Grazor. 

I was watching at a TCA mate’s place with a lot of cricket members. They all say hello to Baggers!

I don’t think we thought the batters were threatened by Wagner’s short balls.  It was more a question of having shots restricted against shorter balls. That is my opinion anyway.

umpires permitted the original bodyline too

quite frankly if we do over 50% shortballs against a 6-3 legside field I'd boycott the match even though its the boxing day test match

Player safety isn't worth bodyline tactics. That would be 10 times worse for me than sandpaper gate