|
BaggyGreens
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 4.1K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+xSlick work by Wade and paine in that run out.
Your mates on Whirlpool wouldn’t agree! I missed it, but I’m sure I’ll see a replay. Of course. Anything Tim does is rubbish.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Decentric
|
|
Group: Awaiting Activation
Posts: 22K,
Visits: 0
|
+xSlick work by Wade and paine in that run out.
Your mates on Whirlpool wouldn’t agree! I missed it, but I’m sure I’ll see a replay.
|
|
|
|
|
BaggyGreens
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 4.1K,
Visits: 0
|
Slick work by Wade and paine in that run out.
Now Pattinson rubs salt into the wounds of a fairly ordinary day by overstepping and giving the debutant his third life.
|
|
|
|
|
grazorblade
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 19K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+xnz in real trouble here Not the easiest pitch to be fair. Labu made a mockery of it Is clearly the easiest batting deck in the series. Except for about an hour this morning when the Kooka started reversing. I say Labu made a mockery of his first century but it slowed after that and he moved into his comfort zone. not a lot of sideways movement but variable bounce on day 1
|
|
|
|
|
BaggyGreens
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 4.1K,
Visits: 0
|
+xnz in real trouble here Not the easiest pitch to be fair. Labu made a mockery of it Is clearly the easiest batting deck in the series. Except for about an hour this morning when the Kooka started reversing. I say Labu made a mockery of his first century but it slowed after that and he moved into his comfort zone.
|
|
|
|
|
grazorblade
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 19K,
Visits: 0
|
nz in real trouble here
Not the easiest pitch to be fair. Labu made a mockery of it
|
|
|
|
|
BaggyGreens
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 4.1K,
Visits: 0
|
Cummins looking far better today by pitching it up. Getting a hint of reverse as Pattinson and Starc were.
|
|
|
|
|
BaggyGreens
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 4.1K,
Visits: 0
|
+xAustralia must be pleased with this session - 3 wickets for about 60 runs. Surprised Head is bowling before Marnus? Shot - Taylor square drive for 4. So am I. I see the leg spinner being far more dangerous.
|
|
|
|
|
BaggyGreens
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 4.1K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+x+xBaggers, I thought Patto pitched up in Melbourne? Does he need to adjust his length for the Sydney pitch? Oh yes. This is a benign deck for pace.. Ponting calls it spongy. Are you watching FTA, Baggers? I’m watching ad free Fox. I play switchers depending on which commentator I prefer DC. Interesting? I think ads kill coverage. If only FTA available I prefer ABC radio. Except when Skull O'Keefe is commentating.
|
|
|
|
|
Keyboard Warrior
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 885,
Visits: 0
|
Australia must be pleased with this session - 3 wickets for about 60 runs. Surprised Head is bowling before Marnus? Shot - Taylor square drive for 4.
|
|
|
|
|
Decentric
|
|
Group: Awaiting Activation
Posts: 22K,
Visits: 0
|
Definitely some more venom in this Patto spell.
I can’t identify reverse swing, but balls are deviating off pitch.
|
|
|
|
|
Decentric
|
|
Group: Awaiting Activation
Posts: 22K,
Visits: 0
|
+xPattinson now getting reverse. This is a great weapon to have on a flat deck. It is.
|
|
|
|
|
Decentric
|
|
Group: Awaiting Activation
Posts: 22K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+xBaggers, I thought Patto pitched up in Melbourne? Does he need to adjust his length for the Sydney pitch? Oh yes. This is a benign deck for pace.. Ponting calls it spongy. Are you watching FTA, Baggers? I’m watching ad free Fox. I play switchers depending on which commentator I prefer DC. Interesting? I think ads kill coverage. If only FTA available I prefer ABC radio.
|
|
|
|
|
Decentric
|
|
Group: Awaiting Activation
Posts: 22K,
Visits: 0
|
GOAT drops caught and bowled and hurts right thumb.
|
|
|
|
|
BaggyGreens
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 4.1K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+xBaggers, I thought Patto pitched up in Melbourne? Does he need to adjust his length for the Sydney pitch? Oh yes. This is a benign deck for pace.. Ponting calls it spongy. Are you watching FTA, Baggers? I’m watching ad free Fox. I play switchers depending on which commentator I prefer DC.
|
|
|
|
|
BaggyGreens
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 4.1K,
Visits: 0
|
Pattinson now getting reverse. This is a great weapon to have on a flat deck.
|
|
|
|
|
Decentric
|
|
Group: Awaiting Activation
Posts: 22K,
Visits: 0
|
I’m amazed Patto has replaced wicket taker Lyon?
Change of end?
|
|
|
|
|
Decentric
|
|
Group: Awaiting Activation
Posts: 22K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+xBaggers, I thought Patto pitched up in Melbourne? Does he need to adjust his length for the Sydney pitch? Oh yes. This is a benign deck for pace.. Ponting calls it spongy. Are you watching FTA, Baggers? I’m watching ad free Fox.
|
|
|
|
|
Decentric
|
|
Group: Awaiting Activation
Posts: 22K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+x+x+xPicking Latham to get a century today. BC total 280. Marnus the surprise packet with the ball. I’m not one for predictions, but BCs are having to withstand great GOAT pressure on a spinning pitch, Baggers. Does he really build all that great pressure. He can be very one dimensional at times when he is trying to hold up an end. Wish Cummins wud go across the leftie more. He becomes a bit too predictable around the wicket. Pattinson is far too short on this deck. Two quick wickets and the Kiwis are in a spot of. There goes my Latham prediction. He did not do a lot wrong as I saw it. Ponting said the ball held up in this spongy pitch. They are in trouble at 3-119. Chasing something like 457.
|
|
|
|
|
BaggyGreens
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 4.1K,
Visits: 0
|
+xBaggers, I thought Patto pitched up in Melbourne? Does he need to adjust his length for the Sydney pitch? Oh yes. This is a benign deck bounce wise. Ponting calls it spongy...
|
|
|
|
|
Keyboard Warrior
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 885,
Visits: 0
|
Taylor coming in has a 46 average, must hit form soon.
What? Cummins gets Latham out caught at mid on for 49!
|
|
|
|
|
BaggyGreens
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 4.1K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+x+xPicking Latham to get a century today. BC total 280. Marnus the surprise packet with the ball. I’m not one for predictions, but BCs are having to withstand great GOAT pressure on a spinning pitch, Baggers. Does he really build all that great pressure. He can be very one dimensional at times when he is trying to hold up an end. Wish Cummins wud go across the leftie more. He becomes a bit too predictable around the wicket. Pattinson is far too short on this deck. Two quick wickets and the Kiwis are in a spot of. There goes my Latham prediction. He did not do a lot wrong as I saw it. Ponting said the ball held up in this spongy pitch.
|
|
|
|
|
Decentric
|
|
Group: Awaiting Activation
Posts: 22K,
Visits: 0
|
+xGOAT strikes LBW ! Kiwis review. Out! Raval LBW to GOAT. Should have played Swepson, and Neser instead of Wade.
|
|
|
|
|
Decentric
|
|
Group: Awaiting Activation
Posts: 22K,
Visits: 0
|
GOAT strikes LBW !
Kiwis review.
|
|
|
|
|
Keyboard Warrior
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 885,
Visits: 0
|
Kiwis now 1-114 off 48 overs. Our attack is having to bowl under more scoreboard pressure, and Kiwis can bat under less pressure.
|
|
|
|
|
Decentric
|
|
Group: Awaiting Activation
Posts: 22K,
Visits: 0
|
This seems to be where Cummins shows his superiority over Patto and Starc - bowling effectively on a flatter deck.
|
|
|
|
|
Decentric
|
|
Group: Awaiting Activation
Posts: 22K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+xPicking Latham to get a century today. BC total 280. Marnus the surprise packet with the ball. I’m not one for predictions, but BCs are having to withstand great GOAT pressure on a spinning pitch, Baggers. Does he really build all that great pressure. He can be very one dimensional at times when he is trying to hold up an end. Wish Cummins wud go across the leftie more. He becomes a bit too predictable around the wicket. He has bowled a few on leg stump/leg side. Should we we have pulled Lyon from the attack as he was causing probs, for supposed current reverse swing benefits?
|
|
|
|
|
Decentric
|
|
Group: Awaiting Activation
Posts: 22K,
Visits: 0
|
Baggers, I thought Patto pitched up in Melbourne?
Does he need to adjust his length for the Sydney pitch?
|
|
|
|
|
Decentric
|
|
Group: Awaiting Activation
Posts: 22K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+x+xPicking Latham to get a century today. BC total 280. Marnus the surprise packet with the ball. I’m not one for predictions, but BCs are having to withstand great GOAT pressure on a spinning pitch, Baggers. Does he really build all that great pressure. He can be very one dimensional at times when he is trying to hold up an end. Wish Cummins wud go across the leftie more. He becomes a bit too predictable around the wicket. Pattinson is far too short on this deck. Thanks. Will look out for this, mate.
|
|
|
|
|
Keyboard Warrior
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 885,
Visits: 0
|
That Kiwi bloke, Paddles, who seems to know a lot about cricket, was saying Raval isn't up to test standard. I wonder what he thinks now as Raval makes 25 off 38 balls?
|
|
|
|