paulc
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 15K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+xCraig Foster, who today received an OAM, has written an excellent article in the Guardian. I suggest everyone reads it. The Guardian is as Lefty a newspaper can get. Respectfully, I beg to differ. I attend many political actions, where protesters often number in the thousands, which is very large per capita head of population here. The Murdoch media, namely manifesting in the local The Mercury tabloid, often chooses not to report significant political event that I attend over a range of issues - Climate Action, union issues and civil liberties. Moreover, the new manifestation of the emasculated ABC, also doesn't report events, or divides by five as to the number in attendance, and/or omits significant detail. Other TV stations, SBS, 10, and 7, are relied on to report significant events, which again can remain unreported. It means significant political actions and issues are occurring that remain unreported. Even when events I've attended are reported, the salient message of key speakers is frequently omitted! We don't have a locally based Guardian, but to its credit, they report many events that occur. The Guardian also reports in sufficient detail. It also covers a broad range of issues. I'm much better informed, in an educative sense, since I've subscribed to it. You can also add much smaller media outlets like The New Daily, Saturday Paper and Michael West. Often at big political events we are asked to disseminate messages, information and facts elucidated by speakers via Facebook and other social media to keep people informed. So much of the media in Australia is controlled by Rupert Murdoch. News Limited have done little to promote Australian football - it mainly has British/European football content. Moreover, NL media outlets sometimes blatantly ignore many political protests - and - stories that have a progressive content. Because it does not suit Murdoch's extreme conservative agenda agenda, a great deal of items deemed newsworthy in the past, remain unreported. Thank goodness for The Guardian! If the movement is so massive, where were the protests in the other 365 days of the year. Tasmania of all states is embarrassed as to how it dealt with ridding of aboriginals from their state. Maybe this one off turnout is a reflection of that guilt? My opinion.
In a resort somewhere
|
|
|
|
Melbcityguy
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 10K,
Visits: 0
|
Move this to extra time we’re here to talk about football
|
|
|
Muz
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 15K,
Visits: 0
|
+xOf course there was a genocide. To be a "pioneer" in the 1800s meant you could kill the indigenous population with impunity. The land wasn't just cleared of trees. Acknowledge our history. You can do that and still believe this is the best country in the world (which it is). Let's work extra hard to be respectful of the world's oldest living culture. What a crock. Plenty of pastoralists were convicted of murder. Do some reading. Plenty weren't but saying there was carte blanche to murder is garbage.
Member since 2008.
|
|
|
Muz
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 15K,
Visits: 0
|
Just finished listening to Triple Js Hack. As expected it's not changing the date which is the end goal any more it's about abolishing it altogether. No surprise.
Member since 2008.
|
|
|
bettega
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 4.8K,
Visits: 0
|
Of course there was a genocide. To be a "pioneer" in the 1800s meant you could kill the indigenous population with impunity. The land wasn't just cleared of trees. Acknowledge our history. You can do that and still believe this is the best country in the world (which it is). Let's work extra hard to be respectful of the world's oldest living culture.
|
|
|
melbourne_terrace
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 11K,
Visits: 0
|
What a surprise, the first thread Paulc starts in 5 years is a dogwhistling shitshow. Can we just we be done with him please, this got stale a decade ago.
Viennese Vuck
|
|
|
Decentric 2
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 3.1K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+xThere is actually a 1/365 (or 366 in leap years) chance that the very first human placed a foot in Australia on that day. But the date itself is not the point. I acknowledge that this has nothing to do with football and my part in contributing to that. From my very limited exposure, for the main part the issue will be lessened considerably by the majority of Australians genuinely understanding what happened to the 'Australian Aborigine' in the years since colonial settlement. From the killings and poisoning through to the young woman who had to line up at the local townhall for hours to ask for some of the money she had earned to be able to buy a dress to go somewhere with her boyfriend. If people heard the stories from the people who are willing to tell them, and substituted any other person they know and think fairly of, they would proudly and protectively stand up and say 'this is not on'. As a nation we strongly oppose the actions that happened historically.Clashing values with political tag-alongs, career activists and money hungry opportunists has so clouded this issue that resolution is made such a difficult prospect. Only some want financial reparation - I think that real understanding and recognition means so much more to the majority of the people affected by it. Of course we oppose what happened. And.......now what? You see. There's no possible finishing line with what you're saying. There's no possible way to measure when the end goal has been reached or will be reached. I'm not looking to pick a fight here but the wishy washy words I hear on TV from activists and SJW's are just that. Words. There's never a concrete plan with a line drawn on the ground that we can get to. We are waiting on the Aboriginal movement to expound on the specific detail as to what they want. A concrete notion/plan as an alternative to Australia Day isn't far away. I know a number of politicians and leaders of pressure groups in person. What they say to the media and what is reported, after editing, can be quite different. They often say, ' Did I say that,' after seeing themselves on TV. It has happened to me too. To base one's perceptions from radio and TV exclusively, can depict an inaccurate appraisal of events. The media wants the 6 - 10 second grab. Scotty From Marketing is very good at it, but struggles when asked to debate in detail. Often this only occurs in debates with Opposition Leaders around elections.
|
|
|
Decentric 2
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 3.1K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+xCraig Foster, who today received an OAM, has written an excellent article in the Guardian. I suggest everyone reads it. The Guardian is as Lefty a newspaper can get. Respectfully, I beg to differ. I attend many political actions, where protesters often number in the thousands, which is very large per capita head of population here. The Murdoch media, namely manifesting in the local The Mercury tabloid, often chooses not to report significant political event that I attend over a range of issues - Climate Action, union issues and civil liberties. Moreover, the new manifestation of the emasculated ABC, also doesn't report events, or divides by five as to the number in attendance, and/or omits significant detail. Other TV stations, SBS, 10, and 7, are relied on to report significant events, which again can remain unreported. It means significant political actions and issues are occurring that remain unreported. Even when events I've attended are reported, the salient message of key speakers is frequently omitted! We don't have a locally based Guardian, but to its credit, they report many events that occur. The Guardian also reports in sufficient detail. It also covers a broad range of issues. I'm much better informed, in an educative sense, since I've subscribed to it. You can also add much smaller media outlets like The New Daily, Saturday Paper and Michael West. Often at big political events we are asked to disseminate messages, information and facts elucidated by speakers via Facebook and other social media to keep people informed. So much of the media in Australia is controlled by Rupert Murdoch. News Limited have done little to promote Australian football - it mainly has British/European football content. Moreover, NL media outlets sometimes blatantly ignore many political protests - and - stories that have a progressive content. Because it does not suit Murdoch's extreme conservative agenda agenda, a great deal of items deemed newsworthy in the past, remain unreported. Thank goodness for The Guardian!
|
|
|
Decentric 2
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 3.1K,
Visits: 0
|
+xFuck this forum is full of hateful, sociopathic rednecks If you are who I think you are, and we know each other off forum, you can advance much, much more persuasive arguments about this issue, and others, than you have to date! There are definitely some progressives who participate on FTBL Forum.
|
|
|
Decentric 2
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 3.1K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+xI agree with you Paul C Aus is the best country in the world even before the USA .I came to Australia as a 7year old back in 1948 that's 73 years ago and the secret is that if you migrate to this country you have to ASSIMILATE .......Happy Australia day to all................charliecat What a hotbed that subject is.. It is. The Change The Date rally was organised by the Aboriginal movement. It was attended by many activists from the union movement, Climate Action, environmentalists and civil liberties. State Labor and Green leaders, a spokesperson for the union movement, an Anglican Church Minister, So the usual rent-a-crowd... So that’s only about 25,990,000 who didn’t attend your little parade. To assume everybody who did not attend Australia wide demos for Change The Date, agrees the date should not be changed, is flawed. I think we are not far from 50% of the population. Attitudes are also changing quickly. Having a few beers with a former state premier today, he is adamant the Change The Date movement has reached a critical mass where the date change is inevitable.
|
|
|
Decentric 2
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 3.1K,
Visits: 0
|
To actually hear from Indigenous people in person as to how they've suffered over time - exemplified in disproportional numbers of Aboriginals who are incarcerated, much lower life expectancy than average Australians, low attendance in schools, etc, from the First Nations people who occupied this country before European settlement - is quite powerful, and at the same time, depressing.
There have been comments in this thread that the majority of Aussies don't care about changing the date. Amongst my friendship milieu, there has been a recent massive shift in recent times. Many mates, of both genders, who used to socialise together and drink alcohol at BBQs on Australia Day, now prioritise Invasion Day protests instead. Just as Labor PM, Kevin Rudd apologised to Indigenous people, after Howard refused, there is tremendous momentum to change the day. Tas Labor Party have a policy to change the date. Ditto Greens. I'm assuming Fed Labor adopt the same positions?
In previous protests on Australia Day in my neck of the woods, it would have been organised by the Aboriginal Centre and been supported by a number of individuals. The would possibly comprise 100- 200 about 10 years ago. These protests now number 8 -10 000 - which is quite an exponential increase.
When one looks at these groups attending Change The Date Rally:
* High school and uni students
* Chuches
* Civil liberties
* Unions
* Aged pensioners
* Climate Activists
* Environmentalists
* Much greater numbers of young people under the age of 25
* Migrant groups
* LGBTIQA
Plus, many politicians from:
* Aus Labor Party
* Greens
* Progressive Independents
We are looking at 5% of the total population in my home town aged between 0 - 90.
The demo yesterday was the biggest seen in Hobart outside the Vietnam war and recent Climate Action demos. At best they have drawn 10 % of the total population. I'd surmise if one looks at he voting behaviour of the majority of those assembled at yesterday's rally, it probably extrapolates to circa 50% of the vote in elections.
|
|
|
Roar in me Blood
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 4.8K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+xThere is actually a 1/365 (or 366 in leap years) chance that the very first human placed a foot in Australia on that day. But the date itself is not the point. I acknowledge that this has nothing to do with football and my part in contributing to that. From my very limited exposure, for the main part the issue will be lessened considerably by the majority of Australians genuinely understanding what happened to the 'Australian Aborigine' in the years since colonial settlement. From the killings and poisoning through to the young woman who had to line up at the local townhall for hours to ask for some of the money she had earned to be able to buy a dress to go somewhere with her boyfriend. If people heard the stories from the people who are willing to tell them, and substituted any other person they know and think fairly of, they would proudly and protectively stand up and say 'this is not on'. As a nation we strongly oppose the actions that happened historically.Clashing values with political tag-alongs, career activists and money hungry opportunists has so clouded this issue that resolution is made such a difficult prospect. Only some want financial reparation - I think that real understanding and recognition means so much more to the majority of the people affected by it. Of course we oppose what happened. And.......now what? You see. There's no possible finishing line with what you're saying. There's no possible way to measure when the end goal has been reached or will be reached. I'm not looking to pick a fight here but the wishy washy words I hear on TV from activists and SJW's are just that. Words. There's never a concrete plan with a line drawn on the ground that we can get to. I hear you. I do not believe there will ever be a line drawn and a final goal. But I do believe that does not make any steps towards understanding wasted. My point is that we oppose what happened - and yet we are so conditioned to oppose the 'unreasonable demands' and 'wishy washy words' of activists and SJWs that we find it difficult to get past that and see the real people that they purport to represent. Only by listening to the voices of those who genuinely represent those affected (without their own agendas if that were possible) can we hope to get a final goal and be able to ignore the ratbag fraternity who will always find fault or another cause. Just to indulge in some academic thought (I don't want an answer) - if someone with power took your house and land, gave you nothing for it, and assigned you the status of a lesser being - how many generations would have to pass before your family said "water under the bridge - it's all OK"?. What if they did it to a whole community? To a whole country of communities? Generations later, when all the original guilty parties are dead and there is actually no-one alive to blame, and everyone alive believes they have an equal right by birth or citizenship to belong to that country - can we possibly make it all right? Nuff said by me on this (and no doubt too much for many).
When I wear their colours, I am the club.
|
|
|
Monoethnic Social Club
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 11K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+xI'm confused. It says Carlito posted two posts ago but when quoted by Libelous it says MvFCArsenal16.8 as the poster.
How does that work? Used to go by mvfcarsenal. But now use my actual nickname i grew up with. As in "Hey Carlito.... Carlito Brigande my friend how you doin?" Top flick if so.... Love carlitos way but no . My actual name is carlo and and everyone called me carlito Yeah I figured as much mate, just yanking your chain... huge Pacino fan and his appalling accent in Carlito was just terrible, but awesome in its terribleness. Love that movie... Vigo as a crippled coke head informant.... gold, just gold. Lol
|
|
|
Bilbo43
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 29,
Visits: 0
|
My 2 cents... dont care about the date, it is arbitrary to me what day we celebrate, I think it is silly to demand a date that draws different meaning to different people gets changed, but it is even more silly if there is a group of people who find offence to it to demand the date remain unchanged.
Its like hosting a bbq knowing a vegan will be there and you refuse to cook anything non meat. If you want them to feel comfortable and welcomed you should change up something little to keep them happy.
The elders demanding 1 million per person in compensation can go stand on a rusty nail.
|
|
|
Bundoora B
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 12K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+x+x+xFuck this forum is full of hateful, sociopathic rednecks Is it not funny for people like you who for 365 days a year who spout diversity, cultural enrichment and refugees being welcome on these shores, can on one day of the year be against a day that celebrates the day that brought much needed diversity and cultural enrichment to these shores as well as refugees fleeing famine and political/religious oppression in their homelands (namely the Irish and the Scottish). That's a creative way of framing a date that is associated with invasion and attempted genocide. There was no attempted genocide. (Even 'invasion' is a stretch.) Stop saying that. Were aboriginals dispossessed? Yes. Were some murdered or massacred? Yes. But to use emotive language like 'genocide' which brings up images of Rwanda, Cambodia and the Nazi holocaust is ridiculous in the extreme. There was never a government policy to exterminate aboriginals. NEVER. Change the date by all means but lets cut out rampant bullshit while we're at it. im surprised people are still defending this point. i guess it's ignorant generational bullshit that will die out. https://australian.museum/learn/first-nations/genocide-in-australia/ 'Genocide' as in the common usage of the word is not what's happened here no matter what spin you put on it or what that article says. Bosnian muslims marched off en masse and shot in fields yes. Gypsies and Roma people sent to concentration camps to be liquidated en masse in WW2 yes. Jews executed in their millions yes. Hutus killing Tutsi yes. Pol pot murdering millions yes. Aboriginal Australians. No. Not in a pink fit. The fact that pastoralists and others ran amok (hundreds of times) is a disgrace but that doesn't make it 'genocide'. 'State-sanctioned massacres'. Get your hand off it. there is no denying state sanctioned massacres by the british of the First Nations in australia
|
|
|
Carlito
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 28K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+xI'm confused. It says Carlito posted two posts ago but when quoted by Libelous it says MvFCArsenal16.8 as the poster.
How does that work? Used to go by mvfcarsenal. But now use my actual nickname i grew up with. As in "Hey Carlito.... Carlito Brigande my friend how you doin?" Top flick if so.... Love carlitos way but no . My actual name is carlo and and everyone called me carlito
|
|
|
Carlito
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 28K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+xI'm confused. It says Carlito posted two posts ago but when quoted by Libelous it says MvFCArsenal16.8 as the poster.
How does that work? Used to go by mvfcarsenal. But now use my actual nickname i grew up with. Do you remember how to change it? Just curious. Go onto your profile and the first name is the one you change.
|
|
|
Dan_The_Red
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 6.3K,
Visits: 0
|
Foster’s Guardian article is an interesting read. For someone so onboard with his “white Australia = bad” narrative he certainly goes out of way to facilitate refugees taking more of that #alwayswasalwayswillbe land. Hypocritical wanker. Voices plenty of issues, offers zero achievable solutions. Kinda like his football commentary I guess...
|
|
|
sydneyfc1987
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 10K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+x+xFuck this forum is full of hateful, sociopathic rednecks Is it not funny for people like you who for 365 days a year who spout diversity, cultural enrichment and refugees being welcome on these shores, can on one day of the year be against a day that celebrates the day that brought much needed diversity and cultural enrichment to these shores as well as refugees fleeing famine and political/religious oppression in their homelands (namely the Irish and the Scottish). That's a creative way of framing a date that is associated with invasion and attempted genocide. There was no attempted genocide. (Even 'invasion' is a stretch.) Stop saying that. Were aboriginals dispossessed? Yes. Were some murdered or massacred? Yes. But to use emotive language like 'genocide' which brings up images of Rwanda, Cambodia and the Nazi holocaust is ridiculous in the extreme. There was never a government policy to exterminate aboriginals. NEVER. Change the date by all means but lets cut out rampant bullshit while we're at it. im surprised people are still defending this point. i guess it's ignorant generational bullshit that will die out. https://australian.museum/learn/first-nations/genocide-in-australia/ This reads as though the author is trying to convince himself/herself of a genocide more than anything. Absolutely things happened that you would call genocide in any other context (especially from a cultural perspective) but, in regards to a genocide from the "state" (there were multiple colonies if people forgot) from what I've seen and read I have yet to come across anything conclusive. I feel this would be the setting for a robust academic debate however most involved in academia would be very wary to express their true feelings on the subject.
(VAR) IS NAVY BLUE
|
|
|
paulc
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 15K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+xCraig Foster, who today received an OAM, has written an excellent article in the Guardian. I suggest everyone reads it. The Guardian is as Lefty a newspaper can get. What the fuck has that got to do with what he's written? It's his words not the Guardian's. What a ridiculous statement. It doesn't make what I said inaccurate or wrong. I was criticizing the Guardian as you'll never hope see a balanced view, like those that support 26th Jan to balance Foster's opinion. The polls show only 28% support change and is a minority.
In a resort somewhere
|
|
|
Muz
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 15K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+x+xFuck this forum is full of hateful, sociopathic rednecks Is it not funny for people like you who for 365 days a year who spout diversity, cultural enrichment and refugees being welcome on these shores, can on one day of the year be against a day that celebrates the day that brought much needed diversity and cultural enrichment to these shores as well as refugees fleeing famine and political/religious oppression in their homelands (namely the Irish and the Scottish). That's a creative way of framing a date that is associated with invasion and attempted genocide. There was no attempted genocide. (Even 'invasion' is a stretch.) Stop saying that. Were aboriginals dispossessed? Yes. Were some murdered or massacred? Yes. But to use emotive language like 'genocide' which brings up images of Rwanda, Cambodia and the Nazi holocaust is ridiculous in the extreme. There was never a government policy to exterminate aboriginals. NEVER. Change the date by all means but lets cut out rampant bullshit while we're at it. im surprised people are still defending this point. i guess it's ignorant generational bullshit that will die out. https://australian.museum/learn/first-nations/genocide-in-australia/ 'Genocide' as in the common usage of the word is not what's happened here no matter what spin you put on it or what that article says. Bosnian muslims marched off en masse and shot in fields yes. Gypsies and Roma people sent to concentration camps to be liquidated en masse in WW2 yes. Jews executed in their millions yes. Hutus killing Tutsi yes. Pol pot murdering millions yes. Aboriginal Australians. No. Not in a pink fit. The fact that pastoralists and others ran amok (hundreds of times) is a disgrace but that doesn't make it 'genocide'. 'State-sanctioned massacres'. Get your hand off it.
Member since 2008.
|
|
|
Dan_The_Red
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 6.3K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+x+xFuck this forum is full of hateful, sociopathic rednecks Is it not funny for people like you who for 365 days a year who spout diversity, cultural enrichment and refugees being welcome on these shores, can on one day of the year be against a day that celebrates the day that brought much needed diversity and cultural enrichment to these shores as well as refugees fleeing famine and political/religious oppression in their homelands (namely the Irish and the Scottish). That's a creative way of framing a date that is associated with invasion and attempted genocide. There was no attempted genocide. (Even 'invasion' is a stretch.) Stop saying that. Were aboriginals dispossessed? Yes. Were some murdered or massacred? Yes. But to use emotive language like 'genocide' which brings up images of Rwanda, Cambodia and the Nazi holocaust is ridiculous in the extreme. There was never a government policy to exterminate aboriginals. NEVER. Change the date by all means but lets cut out rampant bullshit while we're at it. im surprised people are still defending this point. i guess it's ignorant generational bullshit that will die out. https://australian.museum/learn/first-nations/genocide-in-australia/ That article is essentially “person A picks up rock, throws said rock at person B...that’s a genocide!” If the British settlers intended a genocide, we wouldn’t see any aboriginal people today. Enough with the lies.
|
|
|
Muz
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 15K,
Visits: 0
|
+xThere is actually a 1/365 (or 366 in leap years) chance that the very first human placed a foot in Australia on that day. But the date itself is not the point. I acknowledge that this has nothing to do with football and my part in contributing to that. From my very limited exposure, for the main part the issue will be lessened considerably by the majority of Australians genuinely understanding what happened to the 'Australian Aborigine' in the years since colonial settlement. From the killings and poisoning through to the young woman who had to line up at the local townhall for hours to ask for some of the money she had earned to be able to buy a dress to go somewhere with her boyfriend. If people heard the stories from the people who are willing to tell them, and substituted any other person they know and think fairly of, they would proudly and protectively stand up and say 'this is not on'. As a nation we strongly oppose the actions that happened historically.Clashing values with political tag-alongs, career activists and money hungry opportunists has so clouded this issue that resolution is made such a difficult prospect. Only some want financial reparation - I think that real understanding and recognition means so much more to the majority of the people affected by it. Of course we oppose what happened. And.......now what? You see. There's no possible finishing line with what you're saying. There's no possible way to measure when the end goal has been reached or will be reached. I'm not looking to pick a fight here but the wishy washy words I hear on TV from activists and SJW's are just that. Words. There's never a concrete plan with a line drawn on the ground that we can get to.
Member since 2008.
|
|
|
Bundoora B
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 12K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+xFuck this forum is full of hateful, sociopathic rednecks Is it not funny for people like you who for 365 days a year who spout diversity, cultural enrichment and refugees being welcome on these shores, can on one day of the year be against a day that celebrates the day that brought much needed diversity and cultural enrichment to these shores as well as refugees fleeing famine and political/religious oppression in their homelands (namely the Irish and the Scottish). That's a creative way of framing a date that is associated with invasion and attempted genocide. There was no attempted genocide. (Even 'invasion' is a stretch.) Stop saying that. Were aboriginals dispossessed? Yes. Were some murdered or massacred? Yes. But to use emotive language like 'genocide' which brings up images of Rwanda, Cambodia and the Nazi holocaust is ridiculous in the extreme. There was never a government policy to exterminate aboriginals. NEVER. Change the date by all means but lets cut out rampant bullshit while we're at it. im surprised people are still defending this point. i guess it's ignorant generational bullshit that will die out. https://australian.museum/learn/first-nations/genocide-in-australia/
|
|
|
Muz
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 15K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+x+xChange the date. There is nothing wrong with Australia Day in itself but celebrating it on a date which is insensitive to Indigenous people shows that we have some way to go before being a fully inclusive society. #alwayswasalwayswillbe Every day is considered insensitive to aboriginal people, that’s the problem. One racial group that forms a section of the Australian population holds the rest accountable for any perceived crimes of centuries past. It’s very tiresome, and as current society shows fostering this victim mentality isn’t helping anyone. My great grandparents were murdered by the nazi SS, I don’t go cap in hand to Germany every year asking for reparations and placing blame. There’s zero substance behind that statement. The campaign is literally “change the date” not cancel Australia Day together. There’s so many other more appropriate dates which we can pick. The crimes you mentioned aren’t centuries past, they were still happening just over 50 years ago.
The vibe I get from you is that you think Aboriginals are moochers when that isn’t the case. It will take generations to close the gap because Indigenous people weren’t treated as human for the best part of 200 years. Which part of my statement do you believe has zero substance? Sections of the protesters were not only calling for Australia Day to be abolished, but Australia itself to be abolish. Seems as tho you missed the memo. The key part about these supposed crimes, is they are in fact a past event, like many other past crimes around the world that current generations share no guilt of, you’re being ridiculous. I made no mention of my beliefs towards aboriginal people generally, you’re trying to put words in my mouth, not cool. I assume many of the fools as those protests have no aboriginal ancestry. Australia has existed as a federated country since 1901, and its people (ALL of its people) considered Australian since 1949 so any issue prior those dates, take it up with the British. That every say is insensitive to Indigenous people. Literally no one has ever said that. These crimes aren't supposed and the effects can still be seen today so I'm not being ridiculous. You pretty much did by implying that if you give them any of their demands they'll make further demands in another post and saying that their "Victim mentality" is tiresome instead of considering their legitimate grievances. Also Indigenous people were considers "Flora and Fauna" by the Australian constitution until 1967 and Indigenous people have only been able to vote in Fereral elections since 1962 when the Commonwealth Electoral Act was passed. #fakenews #neverhappened https://www.abc.net.au/news/2018-03-20/fact-check-flora-and-fauna-1967-referendum/9550650#:~:text=Ms%20Clanton's%20claim%20is%20a,under%20federal%20or%20state%20law.&text=Experts%20told%20Fact%20Check%20that,constitution%20relating%20to%20Indigenous%20Australians.https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flora_and_Fauna_Act_Myth
Member since 2008.
|
|
|
Muz
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 15K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+xCraig Foster, who today received an OAM, has written an excellent article in the Guardian. I suggest everyone reads it. The Guardian is as Lefty a newspaper can get. What the fuck has that got to do with what he's written? It's his words not the Guardian's. What a ridiculous statement.
Member since 2008.
|
|
|
Muz
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 15K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+x+xFuck this forum is full of hateful, sociopathic rednecks Is it not funny for people like you who for 365 days a year who spout diversity, cultural enrichment and refugees being welcome on these shores, can on one day of the year be against a day that celebrates the day that brought much needed diversity and cultural enrichment to these shores as well as refugees fleeing famine and political/religious oppression in their homelands (namely the Irish and the Scottish). That's a creative way of framing a date that is associated with invasion and attempted genocide. There was no attempted genocide. (Even 'invasion' is a stretch.) Stop saying that. Were aboriginals dispossessed? Yes. Were some murdered or massacred? Yes. But to use emotive language like 'genocide' which brings up images of Rwanda, Cambodia and the Nazi holocaust is ridiculous in the extreme. There was never a government policy to exterminate aboriginals. NEVER. Change the date by all means but lets cut out rampant bullshit while we're at it. The Stolen Generations were absolutely genocide but not in the same way as those other ones. Mixed raced children were taken from their parents, were basically forced to denounce all of their culture, being taught that being black is bad and were basicially made to marry white people and basically breed out their Abroiginality while other Indigenous people were pretty much left to their own devices and excluded from society so they'd eventually die out. All of this stuff is taught in schools now. The stolen generations were nothing to do with genocide. It was a misplaced and misguided (some will disagree) attempt to 'rescue' half caste children on the assumption that full blooded aboriginals were going to become extinct given the rapid decline of their population since white settlement. As wrong as it may have been it wasn't genocide by any stretch. Calling it such doesn't help. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stolen_Generations
Member since 2008.
|
|
|
Monoethnic Social Club
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 11K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+x+x+x+xI agree with you Paul C Aus is the best country in the world even before the USA .I came to Australia as a 7year old back in 1948 that's 73 years ago and the secret is that if you migrate to this country you have to ASSIMILATE .......Happy Australia day to all................charliecat Sorry my friend, your assumption regarding assimilation are, outdated, illegal and both morally and ethically repugnant... Happy Australia Day to one of the most multicultural societies on earth, long may we stay that way. There needs to be a complete level of compliance with regards to the law of the land. Some cultures practice activities that are morally and ethically abhorrent that do not resonate with Australian values. I'm sure that charliecat (as I am) would be more than in total agreement about the value of multiculturalism to our great nation. I dont disagree at all, compliance with the laws of the land is key to this statement. Cultural practices that are morally or ethically NOT in line with Anglo Australian values, as long as they are NOT against the law, cannot be discriminated against. As much as you would like to, you cannot for example, prevent someone speaking in their mother tongue or congregating in "ethnic" groups to participate in cultural activities they deem important to them. Multiculturalism, as a credo, means exactly that, lots of different cultures coexisting in one nation. This overwhelming concept of "true blue Dinky di Ozzieness" may resonate with you but it doesn't for hundreds of thousands of other citizens of this great land. I didn't have any relatives die at Gallipoli, none of my ancestors ever came here in chains and I have never had a meat pie in my life but still consider myself Australian.. Who are you to tell me I have to assimilate to a particular way of thinking or acting to comply with this failed notion of "white Australia"? Sending 12 year olds overseas to pre-arranged marriages is an example of unacceptable cultural values. I don't have to be a white Anglo to know that. Again, not if it happens within the confines of Australian law. Sending your child to another country, provided they are exempt to travel internationally or are accompanied by an adult is legal - what happens overseas is absolutely vile to me too, I agree with you on that. You, of course, are bringing up the most extreme of examples however, where do you sit on the issue of Muslim women wearing the full face covering for example? Is this "Non Australian" for you? What about the African Cup of Nations Soccer tournament held in Melbourne and Sydney recently, is that "Non Australian"? Off topic, but the African Cup of Nations is an annual event in Perth as well. Sorry mate, no offence meant... I think its a great event and wish other "ethnicities" like my own still did things like this.
|
|
|
petszk
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 4.2K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+x+x+xI agree with you Paul C Aus is the best country in the world even before the USA .I came to Australia as a 7year old back in 1948 that's 73 years ago and the secret is that if you migrate to this country you have to ASSIMILATE .......Happy Australia day to all................charliecat Sorry my friend, your assumption regarding assimilation are, outdated, illegal and both morally and ethically repugnant... Happy Australia Day to one of the most multicultural societies on earth, long may we stay that way. There needs to be a complete level of compliance with regards to the law of the land. Some cultures practice activities that are morally and ethically abhorrent that do not resonate with Australian values. I'm sure that charliecat (as I am) would be more than in total agreement about the value of multiculturalism to our great nation. I dont disagree at all, compliance with the laws of the land is key to this statement. Cultural practices that are morally or ethically NOT in line with Anglo Australian values, as long as they are NOT against the law, cannot be discriminated against. As much as you would like to, you cannot for example, prevent someone speaking in their mother tongue or congregating in "ethnic" groups to participate in cultural activities they deem important to them. Multiculturalism, as a credo, means exactly that, lots of different cultures coexisting in one nation. This overwhelming concept of "true blue Dinky di Ozzieness" may resonate with you but it doesn't for hundreds of thousands of other citizens of this great land. I didn't have any relatives die at Gallipoli, none of my ancestors ever came here in chains and I have never had a meat pie in my life but still consider myself Australian.. Who are you to tell me I have to assimilate to a particular way of thinking or acting to comply with this failed notion of "white Australia"? Sending 12 year olds overseas to pre-arranged marriages is an example of unacceptable cultural values. I don't have to be a white Anglo to know that. Again, not if it happens within the confines of Australian law. Sending your child to another country, provided they are exempt to travel internationally or are accompanied by an adult is legal - what happens overseas is absolutely vile to me too, I agree with you on that. You, of course, are bringing up the most extreme of examples however, where do you sit on the issue of Muslim women wearing the full face covering for example? Is this "Non Australian" for you? What about the African Cup of Nations Soccer tournament held in Melbourne and Sydney recently, is that "Non Australian"? Off topic, but the African Cup of Nations is an annual event in Perth as well.
|
|
|
paulc
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 15K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+x+x+xI agree with you Paul C Aus is the best country in the world even before the USA .I came to Australia as a 7year old back in 1948 that's 73 years ago and the secret is that if you migrate to this country you have to ASSIMILATE .......Happy Australia day to all................charliecat Sorry my friend, your assumption regarding assimilation are, outdated, illegal and both morally and ethically repugnant... Happy Australia Day to one of the most multicultural societies on earth, long may we stay that way. There needs to be a complete level of compliance with regards to the law of the land. Some cultures practice activities that are morally and ethically abhorrent that do not resonate with Australian values. I'm sure that charliecat (as I am) would be more than in total agreement about the value of multiculturalism to our great nation. I dont disagree at all, compliance with the laws of the land is key to this statement. Cultural practices that are morally or ethically NOT in line with Anglo Australian values, as long as they are NOT against the law, cannot be discriminated against. As much as you would like to, you cannot for example, prevent someone speaking in their mother tongue or congregating in "ethnic" groups to participate in cultural activities they deem important to them. Multiculturalism, as a credo, means exactly that, lots of different cultures coexisting in one nation. This overwhelming concept of "true blue Dinky di Ozzieness" may resonate with you but it doesn't for hundreds of thousands of other citizens of this great land. I didn't have any relatives die at Gallipoli, none of my ancestors ever came here in chains and I have never had a meat pie in my life but still consider myself Australian.. Who are you to tell me I have to assimilate to a particular way of thinking or acting to comply with this failed notion of "white Australia"? Sending 12 year olds overseas to pre-arranged marriages is an example of unacceptable cultural values. I don't have to be a white Anglo to know that. Again, not if it happens within the confines of Australian law. Sending your child to another country, provided they are exempt to travel internationally or are accompanied by an adult is legal - what happens overseas is absolutely vile to me too, I agree with you on that. You, of course, are bringing up the most extreme of examples however, where do you sit on the issue of Muslim women wearing the full face covering for example? Is this "Non Australian" for you? What about the African Cup of Nations Soccer tournament held in Melbourne and Sydney recently, is that "Non Australian"? Playing in a competition that does not infringe in the law and decent humane values is never an issue. Female genital mutilation is another example that is an issue however, often done in secrecy and hidden from the law. Whether these immoral acts happen overseas or not they are perpetrated from Australia by those living in Australia with cultural indifferences. These are not the values we support in Australia.
In a resort somewhere
|
|
|