huddo
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 2.6K,
Visits: 0
|
|
|
|
|
Dan_The_Red
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 6.3K,
Visits: 0
|
Don’t go then. Otherwise “shut up and dribble”.
|
|
|
LFC.
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 13K,
Visits: 0
|
+xDon’t go then. Otherwise “shut up and dribble”. yer its pretty hypicritical - oh but I'll pocket my $ might add. The badgers of honour pros have today.
Love Football
|
|
|
huddo
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 2.6K,
Visits: 0
|
I dunno, I'd rather some sort of objection, then nothing at all.
|
|
|
Hillbilly55
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 564,
Visits: 0
|
So do we assume those 15 (excluding Alex Wilkinson as he's there as PFA President) are on the plane? Poor form if not. Seems a very random selection of players, and very fringe types.
|
|
|
huddo
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 2.6K,
Visits: 0
|
+xSo do we assume those 15 (excluding Alex Wilkinson as he's there as PFA President) are on the plane? Poor form if not. Seems a very random selection of players, and very fringe types. Sure alot of them are. But Irvine? Rowles? Ryan? They aren't fringe.
|
|
|
Hillbilly55
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 564,
Visits: 0
|
+x+xSo do we assume those 15 (excluding Alex Wilkinson as he's there as PFA President) are on the plane? Poor form if not. Seems a very random selection of players, and very fringe types. Sure alot of them are. But Irvine? Rowles? Ryan? They aren't fringe. I should have inserted "some", or even "mostly" fringe players in the signatories. Still, interesting the message this sends to the playing group given it seems to have the imprimatur of the FA.
|
|
|
Feed_The_Brox
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 3.3K,
Visits: 0
|
brilliant. just brilliant.
|
|
|
19-SU-58
|
|
Group: Banned Members
Posts: 2.5K,
Visits: 0
|
+xbrilliant. just brilliant. cause thats going to change anything lol... if anything, Australia's WC tour just got a little more 'difficult'
Not a Phase, Not a Trend, SYDNEY UNITED till the END!
|
|
|
Balin Trev
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 3.7K,
Visits: 0
|
Better than doing/saying nothing like some
|
|
|
Muz
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 15K,
Visits: 0
|
Migrant workers have faced oppressive conditions in Qatar and many died while building infrastructure, stadiums and making other preparations for the tournament, although the precise number is hotly contested. The Guardian has estimated that as many as 6500 workers from India, Pakistan, Nepal, Bangladesh and Sri Lanka have passed away in Qatar since it was given the World Cup in 2010 – but the tournament’s organising committee says only three people died on-site while building stadiums. The International Labor Organisation has independently found that 50 workers lost their lives in 2020, and more than 500 were severely injured. Slight disparity in deaths claimed. Either 3 people, 50 people or 6500 people.
Member since 2008.
|
|
|
Footyball
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 3.8K,
Visits: 0
|
Very good to take a stand. Keep in mind, the athletic clothes that we all proudly wear are from those environments and conditions as well.
|
|
|
tsf
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 14K,
Visits: 0
|
Wow... that will show the Qataris...
|
|
|
Footyball
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 3.8K,
Visits: 0
|
I suppose the Socceroos could go as special forces unit and take out the oppressive regime, or just go and compete in the WC.
|
|
|
tsf
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 14K,
Visits: 0
|
At least the Danes made an all black strip to signify death, this just shows how weak we are imo.
|
|
|
Barca4Life
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 13K,
Visits: 0
|
Great to see, let's hope other national teams follow suit and take a stand too.
|
|
|
tsf
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 14K,
Visits: 0
|
+xGreat to see, let's hope other national teams follow suit and take a stand too. They have. Some a lot stronger that this lettuce leaf whack
|
|
|
Barca4Life
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 13K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+xGreat to see, let's hope other national teams follow suit and take a stand too. They have. Some a lot stronger that this lettuce leaf whack I disagree, if anything none of the nations that have qualified have shown the balls to speak up about it like the Socceroos players have just done. Denmark got an alternative jersey but we need more.
|
|
|
tsf
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 14K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+xGreat to see, let's hope other national teams follow suit and take a stand too. They have. Some a lot stronger that this lettuce leaf whack I disagree, if anything none of the nations that have qualified have shown the balls to speak up about it like the Socceroos players have just done. Denmark got an alternative jersey but we need more. Well, yeah fair enough - it's mostly unqualified countries like Norway who have made strong protests (multiple).
|
|
|
Decentric 2
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 3.1K,
Visits: 0
|
Well done, Socceroos!
I worked in the ME for a while.
The conditions for imported construction workers are shocking in their scorching summers.
|
|
|
Remote Control
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 1.4K,
Visits: 0
|
Well , if they didn' t want to kick us out of Asia before , they will now .. .
|
|
|
Footyball
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 3.8K,
Visits: 0
|
Netherlands protesting by wearing a black jersey signifying death is fair enough but, the Aussies put their faces in front of the camera and directly put themselves out there for others to hear it. The boys should just make sure they go to the toilet or anywhere in groups because the low lives from over there might get ideas.
|
|
|
roosty
|
|
Group: Banned Members
Posts: 758,
Visits: 0
|
These stunts are more about virtue signalling rather than trying to enforce change. Religion is the bedrock of those societies, I dont think they will pay too much attention to some deeply amoral, godless, abortion loving country like Australia trying to lecture it.
Can you imagine if countries did a similar thing for the Australia WC with regards to the treatment of asylum seekers and climate change policies? We would rightly tell those people to fuck off yeah?
I dont understand the current trend of publicly dissing countries or sponsors, but then turning up at their door step expecting to make bank. What’s the message here? You are terrible and we hate you but we love money more? If we accept the invitation to attend Qatar, then we should show appropriate decorum, courtesy and respect to our hosts. Whatever happened to saying thank you?
|
|
|
Muz
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 15K,
Visits: 0
|
+xThese stunts are more about virtue signalling rather than trying to enforce change. Religion is the bedrock of those societies, I dont think they will pay too much attention to some deeply amoral, godless, abortion loving country like Australia trying to lecture it. Can you imagine if countries did a similar thing for the Australia WC with regards to the treatment of asylum seekers and climate change policies? We would rightly tell those people to fuck off yeah? I dont understand the current trend of publicly dissing countries or sponsors, but then turning up at their door step expecting to make bank. What’s the message here? You are terrible and we hate you but we love money more? If we accept the invitation to attend Qatar, then we should show appropriate decorum, courtesy and respect to our hosts. Whatever happened to saying thank you? I agree it's virtue signalling garbage but I imagine the idea is if you draw attention to injustices that are occurring something will hopefully change. Because these poor bloody workers in these countries (and others) are fucked sideways by these pricks. There's plenty of examples of 'virtue signalling' campaigns that have forced companies and countries to do things they ordinarily wouldn't do. To take an unrelated example the single use plastic ban would never have been achieved if it wasn't for 'social justice warriors' banging on about it. But your overarching point is correct. No country with religion as it's bedrock institution is going to listen to a bunch of clowns from Australia who are telling them to accept same sex relationships.
Member since 2008.
|
|
|
roosty
|
|
Group: Banned Members
Posts: 758,
Visits: 0
|
+x+xThese stunts are more about virtue signalling rather than trying to enforce change. Religion is the bedrock of those societies, I dont think they will pay too much attention to some deeply amoral, godless, abortion loving country like Australia trying to lecture it. Can you imagine if countries did a similar thing for the Australia WC with regards to the treatment of asylum seekers and climate change policies? We would rightly tell those people to fuck off yeah? I dont understand the current trend of publicly dissing countries or sponsors, but then turning up at their door step expecting to make bank. What’s the message here? You are terrible and we hate you but we love money more? If we accept the invitation to attend Qatar, then we should show appropriate decorum, courtesy and respect to our hosts. Whatever happened to saying thank you? To take an unrelated example the single use plastic ban would never have been achieved if it wasn't for 'social justice warriors' banging on about it. True but you've also got the virtue signalers in the boardrooms agitating for it, and the board is always concerned about bad press, boycotts etc impacting share price etc. The basis of such decisions are usually appeasing the vultures and commercial interests rather than some great moral deed. As for Qatar, you're doing the exact opposite. No one is going to be influenced by heathens and infidels destined for hell lecturing them about morals and ethics.
|
|
|
sydneyfc1987
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 10K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+xThese stunts are more about virtue signalling rather than trying to enforce change. Religion is the bedrock of those societies, I dont think they will pay too much attention to some deeply amoral, godless, abortion loving country like Australia trying to lecture it. Can you imagine if countries did a similar thing for the Australia WC with regards to the treatment of asylum seekers and climate change policies? We would rightly tell those people to fuck off yeah? I dont understand the current trend of publicly dissing countries or sponsors, but then turning up at their door step expecting to make bank. What’s the message here? You are terrible and we hate you but we love money more? If we accept the invitation to attend Qatar, then we should show appropriate decorum, courtesy and respect to our hosts. Whatever happened to saying thank you? To take an unrelated example the single use plastic ban would never have been achieved if it wasn't for 'social justice warriors' banging on about it. As for Qatar, you're doing the exact opposite. No one is going to be influenced by heathens and infidels destined for hell lecturing them about morals and ethics. Nobody in Australia is going to stop China committing cultural genocide against muslim minorities either. Should we just be silent on that too?
(VAR) IS NAVY BLUE
|
|
|
huddo
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 2.6K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+xThese stunts are more about virtue signalling rather than trying to enforce change. Religion is the bedrock of those societies, I dont think they will pay too much attention to some deeply amoral, godless, abortion loving country like Australia trying to lecture it. Can you imagine if countries did a similar thing for the Australia WC with regards to the treatment of asylum seekers and climate change policies? We would rightly tell those people to fuck off yeah? I dont understand the current trend of publicly dissing countries or sponsors, but then turning up at their door step expecting to make bank. What’s the message here? You are terrible and we hate you but we love money more? If we accept the invitation to attend Qatar, then we should show appropriate decorum, courtesy and respect to our hosts. Whatever happened to saying thank you? To take an unrelated example the single use plastic ban would never have been achieved if it wasn't for 'social justice warriors' banging on about it. As for Qatar, you're doing the exact opposite. No one is going to be influenced by heathens and infidels destined for hell lecturing them about morals and ethics. Nobody in Australia is going to stop China committing cultural genocide against muslim minorities either. Should we just be silent on that too? Not sure if you noticed, they hosted a shit load of international tournament over the last 10 years, no one said boo about the Human rights record.
|
|
|
sydneyfc1987
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 10K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+x+xThese stunts are more about virtue signalling rather than trying to enforce change. Religion is the bedrock of those societies, I dont think they will pay too much attention to some deeply amoral, godless, abortion loving country like Australia trying to lecture it. Can you imagine if countries did a similar thing for the Australia WC with regards to the treatment of asylum seekers and climate change policies? We would rightly tell those people to fuck off yeah? I dont understand the current trend of publicly dissing countries or sponsors, but then turning up at their door step expecting to make bank. What’s the message here? You are terrible and we hate you but we love money more? If we accept the invitation to attend Qatar, then we should show appropriate decorum, courtesy and respect to our hosts. Whatever happened to saying thank you? To take an unrelated example the single use plastic ban would never have been achieved if it wasn't for 'social justice warriors' banging on about it. As for Qatar, you're doing the exact opposite. No one is going to be influenced by heathens and infidels destined for hell lecturing them about morals and ethics. Nobody in Australia is going to stop China committing cultural genocide against muslim minorities either. Should we just be silent on that too? Not sure if you noticed, they hosted a shit load of international tournament over the last 10 years, no one said boo about the Human rights record. They should.
(VAR) IS NAVY BLUE
|
|
|
huddo
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 2.6K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+x+x+xThese stunts are more about virtue signalling rather than trying to enforce change. Religion is the bedrock of those societies, I dont think they will pay too much attention to some deeply amoral, godless, abortion loving country like Australia trying to lecture it. Can you imagine if countries did a similar thing for the Australia WC with regards to the treatment of asylum seekers and climate change policies? We would rightly tell those people to fuck off yeah? I dont understand the current trend of publicly dissing countries or sponsors, but then turning up at their door step expecting to make bank. What’s the message here? You are terrible and we hate you but we love money more? If we accept the invitation to attend Qatar, then we should show appropriate decorum, courtesy and respect to our hosts. Whatever happened to saying thank you? To take an unrelated example the single use plastic ban would never have been achieved if it wasn't for 'social justice warriors' banging on about it. As for Qatar, you're doing the exact opposite. No one is going to be influenced by heathens and infidels destined for hell lecturing them about morals and ethics. Nobody in Australia is going to stop China committing cultural genocide against muslim minorities either. Should we just be silent on that too? Not sure if you noticed, they hosted a shit load of international tournament over the last 10 years, no one said boo about the Human rights record. They should. But didn't, and still don't.
|
|
|
robbos
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 3.8K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+x+x+x+xThese stunts are more about virtue signalling rather than trying to enforce change. Religion is the bedrock of those societies, I dont think they will pay too much attention to some deeply amoral, godless, abortion loving country like Australia trying to lecture it. Can you imagine if countries did a similar thing for the Australia WC with regards to the treatment of asylum seekers and climate change policies? We would rightly tell those people to fuck off yeah? I dont understand the current trend of publicly dissing countries or sponsors, but then turning up at their door step expecting to make bank. What’s the message here? You are terrible and we hate you but we love money more? If we accept the invitation to attend Qatar, then we should show appropriate decorum, courtesy and respect to our hosts. Whatever happened to saying thank you? To take an unrelated example the single use plastic ban would never have been achieved if it wasn't for 'social justice warriors' banging on about it. As for Qatar, you're doing the exact opposite. No one is going to be influenced by heathens and infidels destined for hell lecturing them about morals and ethics. Nobody in Australia is going to stop China committing cultural genocide against muslim minorities either. Should we just be silent on that too? Not sure if you noticed, they hosted a shit load of international tournament over the last 10 years, no one said boo about the Human rights record. They should. But didn't, and still don't. I think they do, I think China's human rights issues are well documented. I know I've been in Europe & when some people find out I'm from Australia, they think we are a racist country because of our treatment of the Asylum seekers & the our Indigenous first nation people.
|
|
|
huddo
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 2.6K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+xThese stunts are more about virtue signalling rather than trying to enforce change. Religion is the bedrock of those societies, I dont think they will pay too much attention to some deeply amoral, godless, abortion loving country like Australia trying to lecture it. Can you imagine if countries did a similar thing for the Australia WC with regards to the treatment of asylum seekers and climate change policies? We would rightly tell those people to fuck off yeah? I dont understand the current trend of publicly dissing countries or sponsors, but then turning up at their door step expecting to make bank. What’s the message here? You are terrible and we hate you but we love money more? If we accept the invitation to attend Qatar, then we should show appropriate decorum, courtesy and respect to our hosts. Whatever happened to saying thank you? To take an unrelated example the single use plastic ban would never have been achieved if it wasn't for 'social justice warriors' banging on about it. As for Qatar, you're doing the exact opposite. No one is going to be influenced by heathens and infidels destined for hell lecturing them about morals and ethics. Nobody in Australia is going to stop China committing cultural genocide against muslim minorities either. Should we just be silent on that too? Not sure if you noticed, they hosted a shit load of international tournament over the last 10 years, no one said boo about the Human rights record. They should. But didn't, and still don't. I think they do, I think China's human rights issues are well documented. I know I've been in Europe & when some people find out I'm from Australia, they think we are a racist country because of our treatment of the Asylum seekers & the our Indigenous first nation people. What sporting protests have existed for china
|
|
|
robbos
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 3.8K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+xThese stunts are more about virtue signalling rather than trying to enforce change. Religion is the bedrock of those societies, I dont think they will pay too much attention to some deeply amoral, godless, abortion loving country like Australia trying to lecture it. Can you imagine if countries did a similar thing for the Australia WC with regards to the treatment of asylum seekers and climate change policies? We would rightly tell those people to fuck off yeah? I dont understand the current trend of publicly dissing countries or sponsors, but then turning up at their door step expecting to make bank. What’s the message here? You are terrible and we hate you but we love money more? If we accept the invitation to attend Qatar, then we should show appropriate decorum, courtesy and respect to our hosts. Whatever happened to saying thank you? To take an unrelated example the single use plastic ban would never have been achieved if it wasn't for 'social justice warriors' banging on about it. As for Qatar, you're doing the exact opposite. No one is going to be influenced by heathens and infidels destined for hell lecturing them about morals and ethics. Nobody in Australia is going to stop China committing cultural genocide against muslim minorities either. Should we just be silent on that too? Not sure if you noticed, they hosted a shit load of international tournament over the last 10 years, no one said boo about the Human rights record. They should. But didn't, and still don't. I think they do, I think China's human rights issues are well documented. I know I've been in Europe & when some people find out I'm from Australia, they think we are a racist country because of our treatment of the Asylum seekers & the our Indigenous first nation people. What sporting protests have existed for china The same protests there is for Qatar, condemnation of a regime. China during the Beijing Olympics did not get away scott free, there was huge condemnation of their regime.
|
|
|
robbos
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 3.8K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+xThese stunts are more about virtue signalling rather than trying to enforce change. Religion is the bedrock of those societies, I dont think they will pay too much attention to some deeply amoral, godless, abortion loving country like Australia trying to lecture it. Can you imagine if countries did a similar thing for the Australia WC with regards to the treatment of asylum seekers and climate change policies? We would rightly tell those people to fuck off yeah? I dont understand the current trend of publicly dissing countries or sponsors, but then turning up at their door step expecting to make bank. What’s the message here? You are terrible and we hate you but we love money more? If we accept the invitation to attend Qatar, then we should show appropriate decorum, courtesy and respect to our hosts. Whatever happened to saying thank you? To take an unrelated example the single use plastic ban would never have been achieved if it wasn't for 'social justice warriors' banging on about it. As for Qatar, you're doing the exact opposite. No one is going to be influenced by heathens and infidels destined for hell lecturing them about morals and ethics. Nobody in Australia is going to stop China committing cultural genocide against muslim minorities either. Should we just be silent on that too? Spot on!!!!!
|
|
|
petszk
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 4.2K,
Visits: 0
|
+xThese stunts are more about virtue signalling rather than trying to enforce change. Religion is the bedrock of those societies, I dont think they will pay too much attention to some deeply amoral, godless, abortion loving country like Australia trying to lecture it.
For the record, abortion is legal in Qatar. Snaffled from Wiki; Qatar's penal code ratified this convention in 1971 by legalizing abortion in cases where the mother's life would be saved. Furthermore, a law formalized in 1983 states that abortions may be legally performed on pregnancies of less than four months duration if the pregnancy were to cause serious harm to the mother's health if continued, or if there was evidence that the child would be born with untreatable mental or physical deficiencies and both parents consented to the abortion
|
|
|
Balin Trev
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 3.7K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+xThese stunts are more about virtue signalling rather than trying to enforce change. Religion is the bedrock of those societies, I dont think they will pay too much attention to some deeply amoral, godless, abortion loving country like Australia trying to lecture it.
For the record, abortion is legal in Qatar. Snaffled from Wiki; Qatar's penal code ratified this convention in 1971 by legalizing abortion in cases where the mother's life would be saved. Furthermore, a law formalized in 1983 states that abortions may be legally performed on pregnancies of less than four months duration if the pregnancy were to cause serious harm to the mother's health if continued, or if there was evidence that the child would be born with untreatable mental or physical deficiencies and both parents consented to the abortion
Modern, pro-choice freedom with this but backwards when it comes to gays and workers rights. What a country
|
|
|
Enzo Bearzot
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 4.5K,
Visits: 0
|
Good on them for sticking to their principles and doing something about it by going there to play.
|
|
|
19-SU-58
|
|
Group: Banned Members
Posts: 2.5K,
Visits: 0
|
Australia and the socceroo players should be the last people lecturing other countries about human rights issues. How quickly people forget the past two years in this country regarding human rights and freedoms lol. play football and STFU.
Not a Phase, Not a Trend, SYDNEY UNITED till the END!
|
|
|
sydneyfc1987
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 10K,
Visits: 0
|
Once again you lot demonstrate your defence of "freedom of speech" only applies if its something you agree with.
(VAR) IS NAVY BLUE
|
|
|
19-SU-58
|
|
Group: Banned Members
Posts: 2.5K,
Visits: 0
|
+xOnce again you lot demonstrate your defence of "freedom of speech" only applies if its something you agree with. You Lot? lol
Not a Phase, Not a Trend, SYDNEY UNITED till the END!
|
|
|
sydneyfc1987
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 10K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+xOnce again you lot demonstrate your defence of "freedom of speech" only applies if its something you agree with. You Lot? lol Yep, you lot. You, Rusty, Enzo and whoever on this forum and in the wider community that blames everything bad in society on "wokeness".
(VAR) IS NAVY BLUE
|
|
|
Enzo Bearzot
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 4.5K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+xOnce again you lot demonstrate your defence of "freedom of speech" only applies if its something you agree with. You Lot? lol Yep, you lot. You, Rusty, Enzo and whoever on this forum and in the wider community that blames everything bad in society on "wokeness". Its good living rent free....haha. Mate -figure of speech so don't get too excited-this is simply NFT. These players are not being genuine, because they are unwilling to actually DO anything that might- at least- be seen to make a difference. In fact they are happy to take the money playing in stadiums built on the bodies of dead poor people.. Hypocrisy. That's modern wokeness in a nutshell.. There was so much wrong with this World Cup when it was given to Qatar, we're supposed to be outraged, now?
|
|
|
tsf
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 14K,
Visits: 0
|
While I agree with your first point, on your second - you guys are chanting ‘for the homeland’ the other week etc.
What do those politics have to do with football?
|
|
|
19-SU-58
|
|
Group: Banned Members
Posts: 2.5K,
Visits: 0
|
+xWhile I agree with your first point, on your second - you guys are chanting ‘for the homeland’ the other week etc.
What do those politics have to do with football? and what does kneeling to BLM and Gay Pride have to do with football? Politics in football, only when you agree with them....
Not a Phase, Not a Trend, SYDNEY UNITED till the END!
|
|
|
tsf
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 14K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+xWhile I agree with your first point, on your second - you guys are chanting ‘for the homeland’ the other week etc.
What do those politics have to do with football? Politics in football, only when you agree with them.... That's exactly what you have just shown yourself to do.
|
|
|
sydneyfc1987
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 10K,
Visits: 0
|
+xWhile I agree with your first point, on your second - you guys are chanting ‘for the homeland’ the other week etc.
What do those politics have to do with football? Yeah but that's something to affects him so its perfectly fine.
(VAR) IS NAVY BLUE
|
|
|
Monoethnic Social Club
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 11K,
Visits: 0
|
Can someone tell me if there was a joint statement before the knockout WC qualifiers in Qatar in June this year? Did all these appalling human rights violations happen after the Peru game maybe? Agree with the sentiment expressed BTW but I have no respect for bullshit virtue signalling.....
|
|
|
charlied
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 2.4K,
Visits: 0
|
Tom Carroll sacrificed a world surfing title by refusing to compete in South Africa during apartheid.
Releasing a video and then going anyway doesn't cut it.
|
|
|
Balin Trev
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 3.7K,
Visits: 0
|
+xTom Carroll sacrificed a world surfing title by refusing to compete in South Africa during apartheid. Releasing a video and then going anyway doesn't cut it. respect to TC - but the World Surfing title is contested every year - not every 4. And Carroll ended up winning 2 world titles still. If Roos boycott qatar it’s the last WCUP that some of the players will probably ever have chance to play in
|
|
|
charlied
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 2.4K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+xTom Carroll sacrificed a world surfing title by refusing to compete in South Africa during apartheid. Releasing a video and then going anyway doesn't cut it. respect to TC - but the World Surfing title is contested every year - not every 4. And Carroll ended up winning 2 world titles still. If Roos boycott qatar it’s the last WCUP that some of the players will probably ever have chance to play in That is a good point
|
|
|
tsf
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 14K,
Visits: 0
|
Interesting that a WC/WCQ match is worth missing for your missus, and cause you don't want to isolate for JMAc, but the deaths of 6500 people just get the old mobile phone message
|
|
|
huddo
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 2.6K,
Visits: 0
|
I'm all for shaming the shit out of them.
I just think this could have been more effective 4 years ago before 6500 people died.
That being said better late then never, the SJW can get the warm fuzzies about playing sport in a country that shits on gays, because the players said 6 weeks before it they don't like it.
|
|
|
quickflick
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 6.1K,
Visits: 0
|
+xI'm all for shaming the shit out of them.
I just think this could have been more effective 4 years ago before 6500 people died.
Exactly. Frankly, Qatar should have lost the hosting rights ages ago. Letting Qatar enjoy the privilege of hosting this is to spit the faces of those who've lost loved ones for the sake of building a fucking football stadium. And, aside from that, I think sportswashing is dangerous; 1936 Berlin Olympics, FIFA World 2018 in Russia, 2022 Winter Olympics in China. After Biden was elected, I would have been pleased if the Australian Government had liaised closely with and the US Government and UK Government and sought to boycott this World Cup while Qatar were hosts (or at least to threaten FIFA with that). So basically, AUKUS countries + any other interested countries; e.g. Germany, Nordics. To say - FIFA, we intend to do our best to qualify... but we reserve the right to boycott, should this tournament take place in Qatar. Should we pursue that course of action, we will prevent any airing of the event on TV networks in our country. It would've fucked FIFA over massively (losing participation and TV deal potential from the UK nations and USA, other European countries, too). They would have had to strip Qatar of the rights and simply make the WC happen in England or somewhere like that.
|
|
|
Footballer
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 1.2K,
Visits: 0
|
This is token virtue-signalling rubbish at it sbest.
We all condemn the appalling human rights records of places like Qatar - which rely on shocking modern slave labour to build their shiny cities - but when all is said and done, we turn up, pay the money, compete in the tournament, and join in the whitewash. Yay!
|
|
|
Feed_The_Brox
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 3.3K,
Visits: 0
|
+xThis is token virtue-signalling rubbish at it sbest.
Its hilarious how some people believe Virtue Signalling or being Woke is a bad thing when the opposite is true. It’s also hilarious when people say “Well why aren’t you boycotting???” There is hardly a country in the world that doesn’t have a bad human rights issue on something. Many countries claim Australia is a human rights abuser due to our stance of offshore detention. Will a country boycott us next year? I bet not. Will anyone speak up about it? Maybe. While SSM and homosexuality is legal here, there are political parties and religious entities that wanna legally discriminate against gays and bring back things such as conversation therapy.
|
|
|
Enzo Bearzot
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 4.5K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+xThis is token virtue-signalling rubbish at it sbest.
Its hilarious how some people believe Virtue Signalling or being Woke is a bad thing when the opposite is true. It’s also hilarious when people say “Well why aren’t you boycotting???” There is hardly a country in the world that doesn’t have a bad human rights issue on something. Many countries claim Australia is a human rights abuser due to our stance of offshore detention. Will a country boycott us next year? I bet not. Will anyone speak up about it? Maybe. While SSM and homosexuality is legal here, there are political parties and religious entities that wanna legally discriminate against gays and bring back things such as conversation therapy. That depends on what you understand it to be. "Calling it out" or "releasing a statement" at no personal risk or cost or- worse- participating and benefiting in the very thing they're opposed to IS bad thing because they're not being genuine about it. Craig Foster is donating his WC broadcast pay to the families of the dead workers. Carol and Ali were two examples in this thread of sportsmen who boycotted thing they were genuinely against and at personal risk and cost. They weren't virtue signalling.
|
|
|
Muz
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 15K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+xThis is token virtue-signalling rubbish at it sbest.
While SSM and homosexuality is legal here, there are political parties and religious entities that wanna legally discriminate against gays and bring back things such as conversation therapy. I realise this is an autocorrect thing but I did laugh. Just what would 'conversation therapy' consist of? Being strapped in a chair and have Enzo and Rusty lecture you on how the 'woke left are ruining western civilisation'?
Member since 2008.
|
|
|
Enzo Bearzot
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 4.5K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+xThis is token virtue-signalling rubbish at it sbest.
While SSM and homosexuality is legal here, there are political parties and religious entities that wanna legally discriminate against gays and bring back things such as conversation therapy. I realise this is an autocorrect thing but I did laugh. Just what would 'conversation therapy' consist of? Being strapped in a chair and have Enzo and Rusty lecture you on how the 'woke left are ruining western civilisation'? No, the therapy would be needed after.
|
|
|
tsf
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 14K,
Visits: 0
|
Can I just say, disagreeing with the deaths of 6500 people is not being woke.
Ffs soon, any show of compassion or consideration will be labelled woke. That word is thrown around way too much.
-happy birthday! - stop being woke!
|
|
|
sydneyfc1987
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 10K,
Visits: 0
|
+xCan I just say, disagreeing with the deaths of 6500 people is not being woke.
Ffs soon, any show of compassion or consideration will be labelled woke. That word is thrown around way too much.
-happy birthday! - stop being woke! Saying anything about equality for fair treatment of anyone is woke. Unless you're a rugby league player using "religious freedom" as an excuse to hate the gays. In that case, you're a hero.
(VAR) IS NAVY BLUE
|
|
|
Enzo Bearzot
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 4.5K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+xCan I just say, disagreeing with the deaths of 6500 people is not being woke.
Ffs soon, any show of compassion or consideration will be labelled woke. That word is thrown around way too much.
-happy birthday! - stop being woke! Saying anything about equality for fair treatment of anyone is woke.Unless you're a rugby league player using "religious freedom" as an excuse to hate the gays. In that case, you're a hero. No its the pretentiousness of the comfortable middle class who say things about but do nothing that might affect their lifestyle and indeed owe their lifestyles to inequality. As for Folau, 1. he didn't "hate" anyone and 2. the Constitution doesn't elevate discrimination of one type (sexuality) to a higher standing than another (religious freedom and expression)
|
|
|
huddo
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 2.6K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+xCan I just say, disagreeing with the deaths of 6500 people is not being woke.
Ffs soon, any show of compassion or consideration will be labelled woke. That word is thrown around way too much.
-happy birthday! - stop being woke! Saying anything about equality for fair treatment of anyone is woke.Unless you're a rugby league player using "religious freedom" as an excuse to hate the gays. In that case, you're a hero. No its the pretentiousness of the comfortable middle class who say things about but do nothing that might affect their lifestyle and indeed owe their lifestyles to inequality. As for Folau, 1. he didn't "hate" anyone and 2. the Constitution doesn't elevate discrimination of one type (sexuality) to a higher standing than another (religious freedom and expression) Falou was also contractual obliged not to say anything stupid or inciting. I'm ex-navy if I said something stupid on Facebook I would have got the flick, I know of sailors that did.
|
|
|
Enzo Bearzot
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 4.5K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+xCan I just say, disagreeing with the deaths of 6500 people is not being woke.
Ffs soon, any show of compassion or consideration will be labelled woke. That word is thrown around way too much.
-happy birthday! - stop being woke! Saying anything about equality for fair treatment of anyone is woke.Unless you're a rugby league player using "religious freedom" as an excuse to hate the gays. In that case, you're a hero. No its the pretentiousness of the comfortable middle class who say things about but do nothing that might affect their lifestyle and indeed owe their lifestyles to inequality. As for Folau, 1. he didn't "hate" anyone and 2. the Constitution doesn't elevate discrimination of one type (sexuality) to a higher standing than another (religious freedom and expression) Falou was also contractual obliged not to say anything stupid or inciting. I'm ex-navy if I said something stupid on Facebook I would have got the flick, I know of sailors that did. Falou didn't say anything stupid or inciting Hence the payout he received. reportedly $4 million. As for the navy Falou 1. didn't work for the government and 2. didn't say anything stupid.
|
|
|
Davstar
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 9K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+xCan I just say, disagreeing with the deaths of 6500 people is not being woke.
Ffs soon, any show of compassion or consideration will be labelled woke. That word is thrown around way too much.
-happy birthday! - stop being woke! Saying anything about equality for fair treatment of anyone is woke.Unless you're a rugby league player using "religious freedom" as an excuse to hate the gays. In that case, you're a hero. No its the pretentiousness of the comfortable middle class who say things about but do nothing that might affect their lifestyle and indeed owe their lifestyles to inequality. As for Folau, 1. he didn't "hate" anyone and 2. the Constitution doesn't elevate discrimination of one type (sexuality) to a higher standing than another (religious freedom and expression) Falou was also contractual obliged not to say anything stupid or inciting. I'm ex-navy if I said something stupid on Facebook I would have got the flick, I know of sailors that did. he didn't he said his comments in his 'own church' not wearing the jersey and not directly to the media, his contact being torn up is the biggest disgrace in Sporting history. thus he was paid millions in settlement because of the fact he didnt breech his contract directly
these Kangaroos can play football - Ange P. (Intercontinental WC Play-offs 2017)
KEEP POLITICS OUT OF FOOTBALL
|
|
|
robbos
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 3.8K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+x+xCan I just say, disagreeing with the deaths of 6500 people is not being woke.
Ffs soon, any show of compassion or consideration will be labelled woke. That word is thrown around way too much.
-happy birthday! - stop being woke! Saying anything about equality for fair treatment of anyone is woke.Unless you're a rugby league player using "religious freedom" as an excuse to hate the gays. In that case, you're a hero. No its the pretentiousness of the comfortable middle class who say things about but do nothing that might affect their lifestyle and indeed owe their lifestyles to inequality. As for Folau, 1. he didn't "hate" anyone and 2. the Constitution doesn't elevate discrimination of one type (sexuality) to a higher standing than another (religious freedom and expression) Falou was also contractual obliged not to say anything stupid or inciting. I'm ex-navy if I said something stupid on Facebook I would have got the flick, I know of sailors that did. he didn't he said his comments in his 'own church' not wearing the jersey and not directly to the media, his contact being torn up is the biggest disgrace in Sporting history. From a 'purely' Rugby point of view i would prefer to keep politics and religious belief out of Rugby and i do not support his protest - . - This is Rugby not Mardi gra - keep your politics, religious dogma, Fun police, Daddy's a minster and any other shit out of it. Did you hear this before
|
|
|
Davstar
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 9K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+x+x+xCan I just say, disagreeing with the deaths of 6500 people is not being woke.
Ffs soon, any show of compassion or consideration will be labelled woke. That word is thrown around way too much.
-happy birthday! - stop being woke! Saying anything about equality for fair treatment of anyone is woke.Unless you're a rugby league player using "religious freedom" as an excuse to hate the gays. In that case, you're a hero. No its the pretentiousness of the comfortable middle class who say things about but do nothing that might affect their lifestyle and indeed owe their lifestyles to inequality. As for Folau, 1. he didn't "hate" anyone and 2. the Constitution doesn't elevate discrimination of one type (sexuality) to a higher standing than another (religious freedom and expression) Falou was also contractual obliged not to say anything stupid or inciting. I'm ex-navy if I said something stupid on Facebook I would have got the flick, I know of sailors that did. he didn't he said his comments in his 'own church' not wearing the jersey and not directly to the media, his contact being torn up is the biggest disgrace in Sporting history. From a 'purely' Rugby point of view i would prefer to keep politics and religious belief out of Rugby and i do not support his protest - . - This is Rugby not Mardi gra - keep your politics, religious dogma, Fun police, Daddy's a minster and any other shit out of it. Did you hear this before i agree, i didnt bring this up im just following the conversation but I from a purely Rugby Point of view bar him being a rugby player it has nothing to do with Rugby..... that is the point the Socceroos in this video have put rainbow culture at the helm of football....if you cannot see the difference im sorry your fucken idiot for me keep politics out of sport if you wanted to do a protest away from football that would be fine but otherwise this has just put a target on the Socceroos back i do wonder why people get so 'touchy' about Religion, political parties, Rainbow shit, woke culture etc keep it away from sport it has no place in the game players can be gay, Religious, vote ALP/Greens/LNP, socialist etc away from the pitch and the sport but when it comes to the sport itself it should be 100 neutral on all issues
these Kangaroos can play football - Ange P. (Intercontinental WC Play-offs 2017)
KEEP POLITICS OUT OF FOOTBALL
|
|
|
robbos
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 3.8K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+x+x+x+xCan I just say, disagreeing with the deaths of 6500 people is not being woke.
Ffs soon, any show of compassion or consideration will be labelled woke. That word is thrown around way too much.
-happy birthday! - stop being woke! Saying anything about equality for fair treatment of anyone is woke.Unless you're a rugby league player using "religious freedom" as an excuse to hate the gays. In that case, you're a hero. No its the pretentiousness of the comfortable middle class who say things about but do nothing that might affect their lifestyle and indeed owe their lifestyles to inequality. As for Folau, 1. he didn't "hate" anyone and 2. the Constitution doesn't elevate discrimination of one type (sexuality) to a higher standing than another (religious freedom and expression) Falou was also contractual obliged not to say anything stupid or inciting. I'm ex-navy if I said something stupid on Facebook I would have got the flick, I know of sailors that did. he didn't he said his comments in his 'own church' not wearing the jersey and not directly to the media, his contact being torn up is the biggest disgrace in Sporting history. From a 'purely' Rugby point of view i would prefer to keep politics and religious belief out of Rugby and i do not support his protest - . - This is Rugby not Mardi gra - keep your politics, religious dogma, Fun police, Daddy's a minster and any other shit out of it. Did you hear this before i agree, i didnt bring this up im just following the conversation but I from a purely Rugby Point of view bar him being a rugby player it has nothing to do with Rugby..... that is the point the Socceroos in this video have put rainbow culture at the helm of football....if you cannot see the difference im sorry your fucken idiot for me keep politics out of sport if you wanted to do a protest away from football that would be fine but otherwise this has just put a target on the Socceroos back i do wonder why people get so 'touchy' about Religion, political parties, Rainbow shit, woke culture etc keep it away from sport it has no place in the game players can be gay, Religious, vote ALP/Greens/LNP, socialist etc away from the pitch and the sport but when it comes to the sport itself it should be 100 neutral on all issues Wow you now starting to insult people because they don't agree with you, so who is the fucken idiot? So it's Ok for a person to have an opinion, not an organisation after discussing with the individuals? If you think Sport & politics don't mix, I suggest you read some history books, start with the 1936, 1968, 1972, 1980 1984 Olympics, the 1978 world cup, the Sth African apartied, India v Pakinstan in Cricket, the waterpolo game between Russia & Hungary. I could go on & on & not even reach this 'WOKE' period you are so worried about. Let's stay with football, what was the Celtic v Rangers rivalry, the NSL Serbian v Croatian rivalry on the football field, The England v Scotland games in the old Home internationals. Football & sport go hand in hand with politics throughout history. Bit of advice Champ, when not happy with discussion don't insult people, either continue in civil manner or move on.
|
|
|
Davide82
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 12K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+x+x+x+xCan I just say, disagreeing with the deaths of 6500 people is not being woke.
Ffs soon, any show of compassion or consideration will be labelled woke. That word is thrown around way too much.
-happy birthday! - stop being woke! Saying anything about equality for fair treatment of anyone is woke.Unless you're a rugby league player using "religious freedom" as an excuse to hate the gays. In that case, you're a hero. No its the pretentiousness of the comfortable middle class who say things about but do nothing that might affect their lifestyle and indeed owe their lifestyles to inequality. As for Folau, 1. he didn't "hate" anyone and 2. the Constitution doesn't elevate discrimination of one type (sexuality) to a higher standing than another (religious freedom and expression) Falou was also contractual obliged not to say anything stupid or inciting. I'm ex-navy if I said something stupid on Facebook I would have got the flick, I know of sailors that did. he didn't he said his comments in his 'own church' not wearing the jersey and not directly to the media, his contact being torn up is the biggest disgrace in Sporting history. From a 'purely' Rugby point of view i would prefer to keep politics and religious belief out of Rugby and i do not support his protest - . - This is Rugby not Mardi gra - keep your politics, religious dogma, Fun police, Daddy's a minster and any other shit out of it. Did you hear this before i do wonder why people get so 'touchy' about Religion, political parties, Rainbow shit, woke culture etc You got tetchy that someone called you champ and consistently blow your top over the smallest issues if someone has an opposing point of view. It does seem to always be the way with the tough guy anti woke brigade aha jaws of glass projecting their weakness outwards
|
|
|
huddo
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 2.6K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+x+xCan I just say, disagreeing with the deaths of 6500 people is not being woke.
Ffs soon, any show of compassion or consideration will be labelled woke. That word is thrown around way too much.
-happy birthday! - stop being woke! Saying anything about equality for fair treatment of anyone is woke.Unless you're a rugby league player using "religious freedom" as an excuse to hate the gays. In that case, you're a hero. No its the pretentiousness of the comfortable middle class who say things about but do nothing that might affect their lifestyle and indeed owe their lifestyles to inequality. As for Folau, 1. he didn't "hate" anyone and 2. the Constitution doesn't elevate discrimination of one type (sexuality) to a higher standing than another (religious freedom and expression) Falou was also contractual obliged not to say anything stupid or inciting. I'm ex-navy if I said something stupid on Facebook I would have got the flick, I know of sailors that did. he didn't he said his comments in his 'own church' not wearing the jersey and not directly to the media, his contact being torn up is the biggest disgrace in Sporting history. thus he was paid millions in settlement because of the fact he didnt breech his contract directly Better look that one up again champ. He was terminated for an Instagram post that quoted Corinthian. He was paid because the legal proceeding were draining a bankrupt Rugby Australia (they were $20m in debt when they settled), rugby Australia couldn't continue down the legal path.
|
|
|
Davstar
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 9K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+x+x+xCan I just say, disagreeing with the deaths of 6500 people is not being woke.
Ffs soon, any show of compassion or consideration will be labelled woke. That word is thrown around way too much.
-happy birthday! - stop being woke! Saying anything about equality for fair treatment of anyone is woke.Unless you're a rugby league player using "religious freedom" as an excuse to hate the gays. In that case, you're a hero. No its the pretentiousness of the comfortable middle class who say things about but do nothing that might affect their lifestyle and indeed owe their lifestyles to inequality. As for Folau, 1. he didn't "hate" anyone and 2. the Constitution doesn't elevate discrimination of one type (sexuality) to a higher standing than another (religious freedom and expression) Falou was also contractual obliged not to say anything stupid or inciting. I'm ex-navy if I said something stupid on Facebook I would have got the flick, I know of sailors that did. he didn't he said his comments in his 'own church' not wearing the jersey and not directly to the media, his contact being torn up is the biggest disgrace in Sporting history. thus he was paid millions in settlement because of the fact he didnt breech his contract directly Better look that one up again champ. He was terminated for an Instagram post that quoted Corinthian. He was paid because the legal proceeding were draining a bankrupt Rugby Australia (they were $20m in debt when they settled), rugby Australia couldn't continue down the legal path.
Dont call me champ - i wonder if his Instagram was in his contract....- regardless he probably should of just taken it down if that was the case im assuming he refused??- my understanding was he was 'at church' quoted something offensive about homos and someone else posted it online somewhere - i never took that much notice but didnt he also do an ad for gay pride or some shit in a pink shirt or something.... i dont 'follow' rugby but it is the prime reason we should keep all this shit away from sport all social politics and religion and other shit does it take away from the sport. im not saying i dont agree with what the Socceroos saying but i'd rather keep this shit away from the game
these Kangaroos can play football - Ange P. (Intercontinental WC Play-offs 2017)
KEEP POLITICS OUT OF FOOTBALL
|
|
|
Enzo Bearzot
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 4.5K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+x+x+xCan I just say, disagreeing with the deaths of 6500 people is not being woke.
Ffs soon, any show of compassion or consideration will be labelled woke. That word is thrown around way too much.
-happy birthday! - stop being woke! Saying anything about equality for fair treatment of anyone is woke.Unless you're a rugby league player using "religious freedom" as an excuse to hate the gays. In that case, you're a hero. No its the pretentiousness of the comfortable middle class who say things about but do nothing that might affect their lifestyle and indeed owe their lifestyles to inequality. As for Folau, 1. he didn't "hate" anyone and 2. the Constitution doesn't elevate discrimination of one type (sexuality) to a higher standing than another (religious freedom and expression) Falou was also contractual obliged not to say anything stupid or inciting. I'm ex-navy if I said something stupid on Facebook I would have got the flick, I know of sailors that did. he didn't he said his comments in his 'own church' not wearing the jersey and not directly to the media, his contact being torn up is the biggest disgrace in Sporting history. thus he was paid millions in settlement because of the fact he didnt breech his contract directly Better look that one up again champ. He was terminated for an Instagram post that quoted Corinthian. He was paid because the legal proceeding were draining a bankrupt Rugby Australia (they were $20m in debt when they settled), rugby Australia couldn't continue down the legal path.
And Folau didn't have legal fees to pay? The NRL was on shaky legal ground and they knew it.
|
|
|
Muz
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 15K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+x+x+x+xCan I just say, disagreeing with the deaths of 6500 people is not being woke.
Ffs soon, any show of compassion or consideration will be labelled woke. That word is thrown around way too much.
-happy birthday! - stop being woke! Saying anything about equality for fair treatment of anyone is woke.Unless you're a rugby league player using "religious freedom" as an excuse to hate the gays. In that case, you're a hero. No its the pretentiousness of the comfortable middle class who say things about but do nothing that might affect their lifestyle and indeed owe their lifestyles to inequality. As for Folau, 1. he didn't "hate" anyone and 2. the Constitution doesn't elevate discrimination of one type (sexuality) to a higher standing than another (religious freedom and expression) Falou was also contractual obliged not to say anything stupid or inciting. I'm ex-navy if I said something stupid on Facebook I would have got the flick, I know of sailors that did. he didn't he said his comments in his 'own church' not wearing the jersey and not directly to the media, his contact being torn up is the biggest disgrace in Sporting history. thus he was paid millions in settlement because of the fact he didnt breech his contract directly Better look that one up again champ. He was terminated for an Instagram post that quoted Corinthian. He was paid because the legal proceeding were draining a bankrupt Rugby Australia (they were $20m in debt when they settled), rugby Australia couldn't continue down the legal path.
And Folau didn't have legal fees to pay? The NRL was on shaky legal ground and they knew it. ARU
Member since 2008.
|
|
|
huddo
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 2.6K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+x+x+x+xCan I just say, disagreeing with the deaths of 6500 people is not being woke.
Ffs soon, any show of compassion or consideration will be labelled woke. That word is thrown around way too much.
-happy birthday! - stop being woke! Saying anything about equality for fair treatment of anyone is woke.Unless you're a rugby league player using "religious freedom" as an excuse to hate the gays. In that case, you're a hero. No its the pretentiousness of the comfortable middle class who say things about but do nothing that might affect their lifestyle and indeed owe their lifestyles to inequality. As for Folau, 1. he didn't "hate" anyone and 2. the Constitution doesn't elevate discrimination of one type (sexuality) to a higher standing than another (religious freedom and expression) Falou was also contractual obliged not to say anything stupid or inciting. I'm ex-navy if I said something stupid on Facebook I would have got the flick, I know of sailors that did. he didn't he said his comments in his 'own church' not wearing the jersey and not directly to the media, his contact being torn up is the biggest disgrace in Sporting history. thus he was paid millions in settlement because of the fact he didnt breech his contract directly Better look that one up again champ. He was terminated for an Instagram post that quoted Corinthian. He was paid because the legal proceeding were draining a bankrupt Rugby Australia (they were $20m in debt when they settled), rugby Australia couldn't continue down the legal path.
And Folau didn't have legal fees to pay? The NRL was on shaky legal ground and they knew it. wrong sport, it was Rugby Union.
|
|
|
Enzo Bearzot
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 4.5K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+xCan I just say, disagreeing with the deaths of 6500 people is not being woke.
Ffs soon, any show of compassion or consideration will be labelled woke. That word is thrown around way too much.
-happy birthday! - stop being woke! Saying anything about equality for fair treatment of anyone is woke.Unless you're a rugby league player using "religious freedom" as an excuse to hate the gays. In that case, you're a hero. No its the pretentiousness of the comfortable middle class who say things about but do nothing that might affect their lifestyle and indeed owe their lifestyles to inequality. As for Folau, 1. he didn't "hate" anyone and 2. the Constitution doesn't elevate discrimination of one type (sexuality) to a higher standing than another (religious freedom and expression) Falou was also contractual obliged not to say anything stupid or inciting. I'm ex-navy if I said something stupid on Facebook I would have got the flick, I know of sailors that did. he didn't he said his comments in his 'own church' not wearing the jersey and not directly to the media, his contact being torn up is the biggest disgrace in Sporting history. thus he was paid millions in settlement because of the fact he didnt breech his contract directly Better look that one up again champ. He was terminated for an Instagram post that quoted Corinthian. He was paid because the legal proceeding were draining a bankrupt Rugby Australia (they were $20m in debt when they settled), rugby Australia couldn't continue down the legal path.
And Folau didn't have legal fees to pay? The NRL was on shaky legal ground and they knew it. wrong sport, it was Rugby Union. someone beat you to it, duly noted and whatever..
|
|
|
Davstar
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 9K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+xCan I just say, disagreeing with the deaths of 6500 people is not being woke.
Ffs soon, any show of compassion or consideration will be labelled woke. That word is thrown around way too much.
-happy birthday! - stop being woke! Saying anything about equality for fair treatment of anyone is woke.Unless you're a rugby league player using "religious freedom" as an excuse to hate the gays. In that case, you're a hero. No its the pretentiousness of the comfortable middle class who say things about but do nothing that might affect their lifestyle and indeed owe their lifestyles to inequality. As for Folau, 1. he didn't "hate" anyone and 2. the Constitution doesn't elevate discrimination of one type (sexuality) to a higher standing than another (religious freedom and expression) Falou was also contractual obliged not to say anything stupid or inciting. I'm ex-navy if I said something stupid on Facebook I would have got the flick, I know of sailors that did. he didn't he said his comments in his 'own church' not wearing the jersey and not directly to the media, his contact being torn up is the biggest disgrace in Sporting history. thus he was paid millions in settlement because of the fact he didnt breech his contract directly Better look that one up again champ. He was terminated for an Instagram post that quoted Corinthian. He was paid because the legal proceeding were draining a bankrupt Rugby Australia (they were $20m in debt when they settled), rugby Australia couldn't continue down the legal path.
And Folau didn't have legal fees to pay? The NRL was on shaky legal ground and they knew it. wrong sport, it was Rugby Union. I probably got to stop commenting because i did not even know what the difference is between league and Union ...ill stick to 'football'
these Kangaroos can play football - Ange P. (Intercontinental WC Play-offs 2017)
KEEP POLITICS OUT OF FOOTBALL
|
|
|
huddo
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 2.6K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+x+x+x+xCan I just say, disagreeing with the deaths of 6500 people is not being woke.
Ffs soon, any show of compassion or consideration will be labelled woke. That word is thrown around way too much.
-happy birthday! - stop being woke! Saying anything about equality for fair treatment of anyone is woke.Unless you're a rugby league player using "religious freedom" as an excuse to hate the gays. In that case, you're a hero. No its the pretentiousness of the comfortable middle class who say things about but do nothing that might affect their lifestyle and indeed owe their lifestyles to inequality. As for Folau, 1. he didn't "hate" anyone and 2. the Constitution doesn't elevate discrimination of one type (sexuality) to a higher standing than another (religious freedom and expression) Falou was also contractual obliged not to say anything stupid or inciting. I'm ex-navy if I said something stupid on Facebook I would have got the flick, I know of sailors that did. he didn't he said his comments in his 'own church' not wearing the jersey and not directly to the media, his contact being torn up is the biggest disgrace in Sporting history. thus he was paid millions in settlement because of the fact he didnt breech his contract directly Better look that one up again champ. He was terminated for an Instagram post that quoted Corinthian. He was paid because the legal proceeding were draining a bankrupt Rugby Australia (they were $20m in debt when they settled), rugby Australia couldn't continue down the legal path.
And Folau didn't have legal fees to pay? The NRL was on shaky legal ground and they knew it. And no Izzy was around 2m in the green, he crowd funded another 2, if the action had drawn on for another 3 years the ARU would have collapsed. I don't think you understand how dire the funding is in the ARU. To add they were about to launch on Stan at the time, and the publicity was drawing from the game.
|
|
|
Enzo Bearzot
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 4.5K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+xCan I just say, disagreeing with the deaths of 6500 people is not being woke.
Ffs soon, any show of compassion or consideration will be labelled woke. That word is thrown around way too much.
-happy birthday! - stop being woke! Saying anything about equality for fair treatment of anyone is woke.Unless you're a rugby league player using "religious freedom" as an excuse to hate the gays. In that case, you're a hero. No its the pretentiousness of the comfortable middle class who say things about but do nothing that might affect their lifestyle and indeed owe their lifestyles to inequality. As for Folau, 1. he didn't "hate" anyone and 2. the Constitution doesn't elevate discrimination of one type (sexuality) to a higher standing than another (religious freedom and expression) Falou was also contractual obliged not to say anything stupid or inciting. I'm ex-navy if I said something stupid on Facebook I would have got the flick, I know of sailors that did. he didn't he said his comments in his 'own church' not wearing the jersey and not directly to the media, his contact being torn up is the biggest disgrace in Sporting history. thus he was paid millions in settlement because of the fact he didnt breech his contract directly Better look that one up again champ. He was terminated for an Instagram post that quoted Corinthian. He was paid because the legal proceeding were draining a bankrupt Rugby Australia (they were $20m in debt when they settled), rugby Australia couldn't continue down the legal path.
And Folau didn't have legal fees to pay? The NRL was on shaky legal ground and they knew it. And no Izzy was around 2m in the green, he crowd funded another 2, if the action had drawn on for another 3 years the ARU would have collapsed. I don't think you understand how dire the funding is in the ARU. To add they were about to launch on Stan at the time, and the publicity was drawing from the game. . ...Rugby Australia’s settlement with Folau cost them a reported A$4m, ....
https://www.theguardian.com/sport/2022/may/27/former-wallaby-israel-folau-picked-for-tonga-rugby-union
So unlike Folau, the ARU wasn't really *that* committed to the cause. Folau was willing to take it all the way at personal risk and cost to himself for his beliefs. I admire him for that.
|
|
|
Monoethnic Social Club
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 11K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+xCan I just say, disagreeing with the deaths of 6500 people is not being woke.
Ffs soon, any show of compassion or consideration will be labelled woke. That word is thrown around way too much.
-happy birthday! - stop being woke! Saying anything about equality for fair treatment of anyone is woke.Unless you're a rugby league player using "religious freedom" as an excuse to hate the gays. In that case, you're a hero. No its the pretentiousness of the comfortable middle class who say things about but do nothing that might affect their lifestyle and indeed owe their lifestyles to inequality. As for Folau, 1. he didn't "hate" anyone and 2. the Constitution doesn't elevate discrimination of one type (sexuality) to a higher standing than another (religious freedom and expression) Falou was also contractual obliged not to say anything stupid or inciting. I'm ex-navy if I said something stupid on Facebook I would have got the flick, I know of sailors that did. he didn't he said his comments in his 'own church' not wearing the jersey and not directly to the media, his contact being torn up is the biggest disgrace in Sporting history. thus he was paid millions in settlement because of the fact he didnt breech his contract directly Better look that one up again champ. He was terminated for an Instagram post that quoted Corinthian. He was paid because the legal proceeding were draining a bankrupt Rugby Australia (they were $20m in debt when they settled), rugby Australia couldn't continue down the legal path.
And Folau didn't have legal fees to pay? The NRL was on shaky legal ground and they knew it. And no Izzy was around 2m in the green, he crowd funded another 2, if the action had drawn on for another 3 years the ARU would have collapsed. I don't think you understand how dire the funding is in the ARU. To add they were about to launch on Stan at the time, and the publicity was drawing from the game. . ...Rugby Australia’s settlement with Folau cost them a reported A$4m, ....
https://www.theguardian.com/sport/2022/may/27/former-wallaby-israel-folau-picked-for-tonga-rugby-union
So unlike Folau, the ARU wasn't really *that* committed to the cause. Folau was willing to take it all the way at personal risk and cost to himself for his beliefs. I admire him for that. Ali - "I don't wanna fight against the Vietnamese, they haven't done anything wrong against me" Folau - " Gays will burn in hell" *cant be bothered looking up actual quotes. but one of these fools is NOT like the other in my eyes.
|
|
|
Enzo Bearzot
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 4.5K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+xCan I just say, disagreeing with the deaths of 6500 people is not being woke.
Ffs soon, any show of compassion or consideration will be labelled woke. That word is thrown around way too much.
-happy birthday! - stop being woke! Saying anything about equality for fair treatment of anyone is woke.Unless you're a rugby league player using "religious freedom" as an excuse to hate the gays. In that case, you're a hero. No its the pretentiousness of the comfortable middle class who say things about but do nothing that might affect their lifestyle and indeed owe their lifestyles to inequality. As for Folau, 1. he didn't "hate" anyone and 2. the Constitution doesn't elevate discrimination of one type (sexuality) to a higher standing than another (religious freedom and expression) Falou was also contractual obliged not to say anything stupid or inciting. I'm ex-navy if I said something stupid on Facebook I would have got the flick, I know of sailors that did. he didn't he said his comments in his 'own church' not wearing the jersey and not directly to the media, his contact being torn up is the biggest disgrace in Sporting history. thus he was paid millions in settlement because of the fact he didnt breech his contract directly Better look that one up again champ. He was terminated for an Instagram post that quoted Corinthian. He was paid because the legal proceeding were draining a bankrupt Rugby Australia (they were $20m in debt when they settled), rugby Australia couldn't continue down the legal path.
And Folau didn't have legal fees to pay? The NRL was on shaky legal ground and they knew it. And no Izzy was around 2m in the green, he crowd funded another 2, if the action had drawn on for another 3 years the ARU would have collapsed. I don't think you understand how dire the funding is in the ARU. To add they were about to launch on Stan at the time, and the publicity was drawing from the game. . ...Rugby Australia’s settlement with Folau cost them a reported A$4m, ....
https://www.theguardian.com/sport/2022/may/27/former-wallaby-israel-folau-picked-for-tonga-rugby-union
So unlike Folau, the ARU wasn't really *that* committed to the cause. Folau was willing to take it all the way at personal risk and cost to himself for his beliefs. I admire him for that. Ali - "I don't wanna fight against the Vietnamese, they haven't done anything wrong against me" Folau - " Gays will burn in hell" *cant be bothered looking up actual quotes. but one of these fools is NOT like the other in my eyes. To have a informed opinion on it, you need to look at the actual quotes rather than second and third hand re-imaginings from people and media with an agenda.
|
|
|
Monoethnic Social Club
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 11K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+xCan I just say, disagreeing with the deaths of 6500 people is not being woke.
Ffs soon, any show of compassion or consideration will be labelled woke. That word is thrown around way too much.
-happy birthday! - stop being woke! Saying anything about equality for fair treatment of anyone is woke.Unless you're a rugby league player using "religious freedom" as an excuse to hate the gays. In that case, you're a hero. No its the pretentiousness of the comfortable middle class who say things about but do nothing that might affect their lifestyle and indeed owe their lifestyles to inequality. As for Folau, 1. he didn't "hate" anyone and 2. the Constitution doesn't elevate discrimination of one type (sexuality) to a higher standing than another (religious freedom and expression) Falou was also contractual obliged not to say anything stupid or inciting. I'm ex-navy if I said something stupid on Facebook I would have got the flick, I know of sailors that did. he didn't he said his comments in his 'own church' not wearing the jersey and not directly to the media, his contact being torn up is the biggest disgrace in Sporting history. thus he was paid millions in settlement because of the fact he didnt breech his contract directly Better look that one up again champ. He was terminated for an Instagram post that quoted Corinthian. He was paid because the legal proceeding were draining a bankrupt Rugby Australia (they were $20m in debt when they settled), rugby Australia couldn't continue down the legal path.
And Folau didn't have legal fees to pay? The NRL was on shaky legal ground and they knew it. And no Izzy was around 2m in the green, he crowd funded another 2, if the action had drawn on for another 3 years the ARU would have collapsed. I don't think you understand how dire the funding is in the ARU. To add they were about to launch on Stan at the time, and the publicity was drawing from the game. . ...Rugby Australia’s settlement with Folau cost them a reported A$4m, ....
https://www.theguardian.com/sport/2022/may/27/former-wallaby-israel-folau-picked-for-tonga-rugby-union
So unlike Folau, the ARU wasn't really *that* committed to the cause. Folau was willing to take it all the way at personal risk and cost to himself for his beliefs. I admire him for that. Ali - "I don't wanna fight against the Vietnamese, they haven't done anything wrong against me" Folau - " Gays will burn in hell" *cant be bothered looking up actual quotes. but one of these fools is NOT like the other in my eyes. To have a informed opinion on it, you need to look at the actual quotes rather than second and third hand re-imaginings from people and media with an agenda. Oh I dont have a dog in the fight either way Enzo. Cassiu's decline into Farrakhan's Nation of Islam is no better or worse in my eyes than this happy clappy jumped up Christ bothering Folau shit.... Im with you on respecting people for standing by their convictions (even if they are wrong in my eyes) I just find one statement to be more worthy of admiration than the other.... my oppinion.
|
|
|
huddo
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 2.6K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+xCan I just say, disagreeing with the deaths of 6500 people is not being woke.
Ffs soon, any show of compassion or consideration will be labelled woke. That word is thrown around way too much.
-happy birthday! - stop being woke! Saying anything about equality for fair treatment of anyone is woke.Unless you're a rugby league player using "religious freedom" as an excuse to hate the gays. In that case, you're a hero. No its the pretentiousness of the comfortable middle class who say things about but do nothing that might affect their lifestyle and indeed owe their lifestyles to inequality. As for Folau, 1. he didn't "hate" anyone and 2. the Constitution doesn't elevate discrimination of one type (sexuality) to a higher standing than another (religious freedom and expression) Falou was also contractual obliged not to say anything stupid or inciting. I'm ex-navy if I said something stupid on Facebook I would have got the flick, I know of sailors that did. he didn't he said his comments in his 'own church' not wearing the jersey and not directly to the media, his contact being torn up is the biggest disgrace in Sporting history. thus he was paid millions in settlement because of the fact he didnt breech his contract directly Better look that one up again champ. He was terminated for an Instagram post that quoted Corinthian. He was paid because the legal proceeding were draining a bankrupt Rugby Australia (they were $20m in debt when they settled), rugby Australia couldn't continue down the legal path.
And Folau didn't have legal fees to pay? The NRL was on shaky legal ground and they knew it. And no Izzy was around 2m in the green, he crowd funded another 2, if the action had drawn on for another 3 years the ARU would have collapsed. I don't think you understand how dire the funding is in the ARU. To add they were about to launch on Stan at the time, and the publicity was drawing from the game. . ...Rugby Australia’s settlement with Folau cost them a reported A$4m, ....
https://www.theguardian.com/sport/2022/may/27/former-wallaby-israel-folau-picked-for-tonga-rugby-union
So unlike Folau, the ARU wasn't really *that* committed to the cause. Folau was willing to take it all the way at personal risk and cost to himself for his beliefs. I admire him for that. He said inciting shit under contract. If your under contract you have an obligation to your employer not to fuck with your employer's business, he did that mutliple occasions. You can try and make this about beliefs. It has nothing to do with the belief structures (even if that's what tweedle dumb and the Sky new team want you to believe). As for the ARU, it was more commited to its own survival, and didn't have the luxury of backing in its decision, to add from a legal stand point there was no social media clause in the contract ( pretty stupid really noting his history). The ARU was cornered in to taking a position by it major sponsor and supporters.
|
|
|
Enzo Bearzot
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 4.5K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+xCan I just say, disagreeing with the deaths of 6500 people is not being woke.
Ffs soon, any show of compassion or consideration will be labelled woke. That word is thrown around way too much.
-happy birthday! - stop being woke! Saying anything about equality for fair treatment of anyone is woke.Unless you're a rugby league player using "religious freedom" as an excuse to hate the gays. In that case, you're a hero. No its the pretentiousness of the comfortable middle class who say things about but do nothing that might affect their lifestyle and indeed owe their lifestyles to inequality. As for Folau, 1. he didn't "hate" anyone and 2. the Constitution doesn't elevate discrimination of one type (sexuality) to a higher standing than another (religious freedom and expression) Falou was also contractual obliged not to say anything stupid or inciting. I'm ex-navy if I said something stupid on Facebook I would have got the flick, I know of sailors that did. he didn't he said his comments in his 'own church' not wearing the jersey and not directly to the media, his contact being torn up is the biggest disgrace in Sporting history. thus he was paid millions in settlement because of the fact he didnt breech his contract directly Better look that one up again champ. He was terminated for an Instagram post that quoted Corinthian. He was paid because the legal proceeding were draining a bankrupt Rugby Australia (they were $20m in debt when they settled), rugby Australia couldn't continue down the legal path.
And Folau didn't have legal fees to pay? The NRL was on shaky legal ground and they knew it. And no Izzy was around 2m in the green, he crowd funded another 2, if the action had drawn on for another 3 years the ARU would have collapsed. I don't think you understand how dire the funding is in the ARU. To add they were about to launch on Stan at the time, and the publicity was drawing from the game. . ...Rugby Australia’s settlement with Folau cost them a reported A$4m, ....
https://www.theguardian.com/sport/2022/may/27/former-wallaby-israel-folau-picked-for-tonga-rugby-union
So unlike Folau, the ARU wasn't really *that* committed to the cause. Folau was willing to take it all the way at personal risk and cost to himself for his beliefs. I admire him for that. He said inciting shit under contract. If your under contract you have an obligation to your employer not to fuck with your employer's business, he did that mutliple occasions. You can try and make this about beliefs. It has nothing to do with the belief structures (even if that's what tweedle dumb and the Sky new team want you to believe). As for the ARU, it was more commited to its own survival, and didn't have the luxury of backing in its decision, to add from a legal stand point there was no social media clause in the contract ( pretty stupid really noting his history). The ARU was cornered in to taking a position by it major sponsor and supporters. Word like "incite" (and "hate") are merely subjective opinions. Who did he "incite"? What did he "incite" them to do? As "for obligations to an employer", his obligation was to play rugby to the best of his ability as per the terms of his contract. He did that. That his employer caved in to the mob and then acted without proper legal counsel is on the CEO. By the ARU "sponsor you mean QANTAS CEO Alan Joyce, who had a dog in that fight and wanted to take Folau down. The ARU should have just told Joyce to GAGF.
|
|
|
huddo
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 2.6K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+xCan I just say, disagreeing with the deaths of 6500 people is not being woke.
Ffs soon, any show of compassion or consideration will be labelled woke. That word is thrown around way too much.
-happy birthday! - stop being woke! Saying anything about equality for fair treatment of anyone is woke.Unless you're a rugby league player using "religious freedom" as an excuse to hate the gays. In that case, you're a hero. No its the pretentiousness of the comfortable middle class who say things about but do nothing that might affect their lifestyle and indeed owe their lifestyles to inequality. As for Folau, 1. he didn't "hate" anyone and 2. the Constitution doesn't elevate discrimination of one type (sexuality) to a higher standing than another (religious freedom and expression) Falou was also contractual obliged not to say anything stupid or inciting. I'm ex-navy if I said something stupid on Facebook I would have got the flick, I know of sailors that did. he didn't he said his comments in his 'own church' not wearing the jersey and not directly to the media, his contact being torn up is the biggest disgrace in Sporting history. thus he was paid millions in settlement because of the fact he didnt breech his contract directly Better look that one up again champ. He was terminated for an Instagram post that quoted Corinthian. He was paid because the legal proceeding were draining a bankrupt Rugby Australia (they were $20m in debt when they settled), rugby Australia couldn't continue down the legal path.
And Folau didn't have legal fees to pay? The NRL was on shaky legal ground and they knew it. And no Izzy was around 2m in the green, he crowd funded another 2, if the action had drawn on for another 3 years the ARU would have collapsed. I don't think you understand how dire the funding is in the ARU. To add they were about to launch on Stan at the time, and the publicity was drawing from the game. . ...Rugby Australia’s settlement with Folau cost them a reported A$4m, ....
https://www.theguardian.com/sport/2022/may/27/former-wallaby-israel-folau-picked-for-tonga-rugby-union
So unlike Folau, the ARU wasn't really *that* committed to the cause. Folau was willing to take it all the way at personal risk and cost to himself for his beliefs. I admire him for that. He said inciting shit under contract. If your under contract you have an obligation to your employer not to fuck with your employer's business, he did that mutliple occasions. You can try and make this about beliefs. It has nothing to do with the belief structures (even if that's what tweedle dumb and the Sky new team want you to believe). As for the ARU, it was more commited to its own survival, and didn't have the luxury of backing in its decision, to add from a legal stand point there was no social media clause in the contract ( pretty stupid really noting his history). The ARU was cornered in to taking a position by it major sponsor and supporters. Word like "incite" (and "hate") are merely subjective opinions. Who did he "incite"? What did he "incite" them to do? As "for obligations to an employer", his obligation was to play rugby to the best of his ability as per the terms of his contract. He did that. That his employer caved in to the mob and then acted without proper legal counsel is on the CEO. By the ARU "sponsor you mean QANTAS CEO Alan Joyce, who had a dog in that fight and wanted to take Folau down. The ARU should have just told Joyce to GAGF. Well I don't know how else to explain what a statement like - all homosexuals are going to hell - is unless i use the words inciting. It wasn't accepting, I guess I could call it devisive. And when you sign a contract with a company, especially at this level, your thoughts aren't yours alone, you are a part of the company and your views publicly are those of the company. Like I said before if I had written something like that when I served I would have been out on my arse, because my values are a percieved to be reflection of the the militaries values. As such you also have a public obligation to your contractual employer. Israel also signed up to a code of conduct, which he had chosen to ignored in making the statements, Israel's point was the code was not legally binding. If you ask me you sign something you own it, including a code of conduct. Blokes an idiot and knob.
|
|
|
Enzo Bearzot
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 4.5K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+xCan I just say, disagreeing with the deaths of 6500 people is not being woke.
Ffs soon, any show of compassion or consideration will be labelled woke. That word is thrown around way too much.
-happy birthday! - stop being woke! Saying anything about equality for fair treatment of anyone is woke.Unless you're a rugby league player using "religious freedom" as an excuse to hate the gays. In that case, you're a hero. No its the pretentiousness of the comfortable middle class who say things about but do nothing that might affect their lifestyle and indeed owe their lifestyles to inequality. As for Folau, 1. he didn't "hate" anyone and 2. the Constitution doesn't elevate discrimination of one type (sexuality) to a higher standing than another (religious freedom and expression) Falou was also contractual obliged not to say anything stupid or inciting. I'm ex-navy if I said something stupid on Facebook I would have got the flick, I know of sailors that did. he didn't he said his comments in his 'own church' not wearing the jersey and not directly to the media, his contact being torn up is the biggest disgrace in Sporting history. thus he was paid millions in settlement because of the fact he didnt breech his contract directly Better look that one up again champ. He was terminated for an Instagram post that quoted Corinthian. He was paid because the legal proceeding were draining a bankrupt Rugby Australia (they were $20m in debt when they settled), rugby Australia couldn't continue down the legal path.
And Folau didn't have legal fees to pay? The NRL was on shaky legal ground and they knew it. And no Izzy was around 2m in the green, he crowd funded another 2, if the action had drawn on for another 3 years the ARU would have collapsed. I don't think you understand how dire the funding is in the ARU. To add they were about to launch on Stan at the time, and the publicity was drawing from the game. . ...Rugby Australia’s settlement with Folau cost them a reported A$4m, ....
https://www.theguardian.com/sport/2022/may/27/former-wallaby-israel-folau-picked-for-tonga-rugby-union
So unlike Folau, the ARU wasn't really *that* committed to the cause. Folau was willing to take it all the way at personal risk and cost to himself for his beliefs. I admire him for that. He said inciting shit under contract. If your under contract you have an obligation to your employer not to fuck with your employer's business, he did that mutliple occasions. You can try and make this about beliefs. It has nothing to do with the belief structures (even if that's what tweedle dumb and the Sky new team want you to believe). As for the ARU, it was more commited to its own survival, and didn't have the luxury of backing in its decision, to add from a legal stand point there was no social media clause in the contract ( pretty stupid really noting his history). The ARU was cornered in to taking a position by it major sponsor and supporters. Word like "incite" (and "hate") are merely subjective opinions. Who did he "incite"? What did he "incite" them to do? As "for obligations to an employer", his obligation was to play rugby to the best of his ability as per the terms of his contract. He did that. That his employer caved in to the mob and then acted without proper legal counsel is on the CEO. By the ARU "sponsor you mean QANTAS CEO Alan Joyce, who had a dog in that fight and wanted to take Folau down. The ARU should have just told Joyce to GAGF. Well I don't know how else to explain what a statement like - all homosexuals are going to hell - is unless i use the words inciting. It wasn't accepting, I guess I could call it devisive. And when you sign a contract with a company, especially at this level, your thoughts aren't yours alone, you are a part of the company and your views publicly are those of the company. Like I said before if I had written something like that when I served I would have been out on my arse, because my values are a percieved to be reflection of the the militaries values. As such you also have a public obligation to your contractual employer. Israel also signed up to a code of conduct, which he had chosen to ignored in making the statements, Israel's point was the code was not legally binding. If you ask me you sign something you own it, including a code of conduct. Blokes an idiot and knob. His statement didn't actually say that. It was literally a "warning" for drunks, homosexuals, adulterers, liars, fornicators, thieves thieves and idolators to change their ways because otherwise hell awaits them. It was paraphrasing of this Bible verse: Know ye not that the unrighteous shall not inherit the kingdom of God? Be not deceived: neither fornicators, nor idolaters, nor adulterers, nor effeminate, nor abusers of themselves with mankind, nor thieves, nor covetous, nor drunkards, nor revilers, nor extortioners, shall inherit the kingdom of God. — 1 Corinthians 6:9-10
He could easily argue that in his statement he is not a condemnation and act and of saviour-he wants to "save" all of those "sinners"-not just homosexuals-from going to hell. Interestingly it became solely about homosexuals and no doubt because of the sponsor ie Alan Joyce. Sorry , but my employer doesn't have power over my thoughts. As for contracts, your employer cannot enforce contract terms which violates your Constitutional rights. It would be like religious schools requiring homosexual teachers to stop engaging or support of homosexual conduct outside of the school ,as homosexual conduct is against their School Code of Conduct. Depending on the nature of the military conduct, they might sack you, but was the dismissal actually tested in Court?
|
|
|
sydneyfc1987
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 10K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+x+xCan I just say, disagreeing with the deaths of 6500 people is not being woke.
Ffs soon, any show of compassion or consideration will be labelled woke. That word is thrown around way too much.
-happy birthday! - stop being woke! Saying anything about equality for fair treatment of anyone is woke.Unless you're a rugby league player using "religious freedom" as an excuse to hate the gays. In that case, you're a hero. No its the pretentiousness of the comfortable middle class who say things about but do nothing that might affect their lifestyle and indeed owe their lifestyles to inequality. As for Folau, 1. he didn't "hate" anyone and 2. the Constitution doesn't elevate discrimination of one type (sexuality) to a higher standing than another (religious freedom and expression) Falou was also contractual obliged not to say anything stupid or inciting. I'm ex-navy if I said something stupid on Facebook I would have got the flick, I know of sailors that did. he didn't he said his comments in his 'own church' not wearing the jersey and not directly to the media, his contact being torn up is the biggest disgrace in Sporting history. thus he was paid millions in settlement because of the fact he didnt breech his contract directly He posted on twitter you nong
(VAR) IS NAVY BLUE
|
|
|
Muz
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 15K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+x+x+xCan I just say, disagreeing with the deaths of 6500 people is not being woke.
Ffs soon, any show of compassion or consideration will be labelled woke. That word is thrown around way too much.
-happy birthday! - stop being woke! Saying anything about equality for fair treatment of anyone is woke.Unless you're a rugby league player using "religious freedom" as an excuse to hate the gays. In that case, you're a hero. No its the pretentiousness of the comfortable middle class who say things about but do nothing that might affect their lifestyle and indeed owe their lifestyles to inequality. As for Folau, 1. he didn't "hate" anyone and 2. the Constitution doesn't elevate discrimination of one type (sexuality) to a higher standing than another (religious freedom and expression) Falou was also contractual obliged not to say anything stupid or inciting. I'm ex-navy if I said something stupid on Facebook I would have got the flick, I know of sailors that did. he didn't he said his comments in his 'own church' not wearing the jersey and not directly to the media, his contact being torn up is the biggest disgrace in Sporting history. thus he was paid millions in settlement because of the fact he didnt breech his contract directly He posted on twitter you nong Instagram wasn't it?
Member since 2008.
|
|
|
johnszasz
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 28K,
Visits: 0
|
Making the German newstickers now and getting a lot of laughter. Their own team, Bayern and government have had quite a lot to do with Qatar lately.
|
|
|
robbos
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 3.8K,
Visits: 0
|
+xMaking the German newstickers now and getting a lot of laughter. Their own team, Bayern and government have had quite a lot to do with Qatar lately. Funny enough how the WC has destroyed the bread & butter of football for all these European countries, EPL, La Liga, Bunesliga, Serie A & Ligue 1, none of the complained because outside of EPL, all the other federations all votes for Qatar.
|
|
|
Davstar
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 9K,
Visits: 0
|
100 percent support free speech However, no one has a gun to your head to go and if you got an issue with Qatar hosting you really should be looking at FIFA as they gave them the hosting rights as for the slave like conditions and homosexuality being a criminal offence in Qatar although i do not support it - it is thier country they can do as they please, we are guests and need to remember that i dont tell my mates where they should put there furniture in their own home.... From a 'purely' football point of view i would prefer to keep politics out of football and i do not support this protest - all this will do is have home supporters chant AGAINST the Socceroos when we are an AFC Side they should be backing us....which means we will likely have the crowd against us. - This is football not Madigra - keep your rainbows, politics, religion and any other shit out of it
these Kangaroos can play football - Ange P. (Intercontinental WC Play-offs 2017)
KEEP POLITICS OUT OF FOOTBALL
|
|
|
jas88
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 5.8K,
Visits: 0
|
good luck winning a qualifier in qatar again, the issue is FIFA the whole EA deal fiasco shows how greedy they truly are.
|
|
|
SMFC and proud
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 1.1K,
Visits: 0
|
The world is full of hypocrisy, corruption and filth. It doesn’t and will never end no matter what trending # all the virtue signalling doomsdayers spew on about daily. I’m going to the WC and very much looking forward to it no matter what Matty Ryan or some crap squad player is on about. Criss crossing the world first class, limo’s waiting for them everywhere, best hotels, best food, glamour wags, hot cars, millions in the bank……..yeah I’m going to listen to these know it all condescending dickheads.
|
|
|
robbos
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 3.8K,
Visits: 0
|
+xThe world is full of hypocrisy, corruption and filth. It doesn’t and will never end no matter what trending # all the virtue signalling doomsdayers spew on about daily. I’m going to the WC and very much looking forward to it no matter what Matty Ryan or some crap squad player is on about. Criss crossing the world first class, limo’s waiting for them everywhere, best hotels, best food, glamour wags, hot cars, millions in the bank……..yeah I’m going to listen to these know it all condescending dickheads. I know because you have a bit of money, who gives you the right to have an opinion, why should we have to listen to Muhammad Ali on the black man movement when he was a wealthy man, wonder who is the real dickhead here.
|
|
|
Enzo Bearzot
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 4.5K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+xThe world is full of hypocrisy, corruption and filth. It doesn’t and will never end no matter what trending # all the virtue signalling doomsdayers spew on about daily. I’m going to the WC and very much looking forward to it no matter what Matty Ryan or some crap squad player is on about. Criss crossing the world first class, limo’s waiting for them everywhere, best hotels, best food, glamour wags, hot cars, millions in the bank……..yeah I’m going to listen to these know it all condescending dickheads. I know because you have a bit of money, who gives you the right to have an opinion, why should we have to listen to Muhammad Ali on the black man movement when he was a wealthy man, wonder who is the real dickhead here. Ali? Ali lived by his words with actions. He risked a prison sentence and lost 4 of his peak boxing years for the causes he believed in. These plonkers will still be playing in Qatar in a few weeks time bet hey, look at them! They released a statement! How activist of them!
|
|
|
quickflick
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 6.1K,
Visits: 0
|
Pre-empting the "sport and politics shouldn't mix" brigade. Politics refers to party-political issues; ALP and LNP, for example.
Human rights issues belong to the domain of international law which is entirely different to politics. Politics and sport shouldn't mix.
But human rights and sport sure as hell should. Human rights issues override sport.
|
|
|
dirk vanadidas
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 2.9K,
Visits: 0
|
We live in age when you have to be seen to be doing something however futile the gesture, that what the rooms are caught up in.
Europe is funding the war not Chelsea football club
|
|
|
AJF
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 2.7K,
Visits: 2
|
Based on the video I assume JMac, Leckie & Genreau will be returning all the blood money they have earned from Melb City care of the fact that Dubai (UAE) has just as many if not more worker deaths than Qatar. If they were genuinely concerned, JMac and Leckie would immediately resign.... UAE has the greatest number of deaths among Indian labourersOn Jul 25, 2022 From 2019 to 2021, Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) member states saw the highest number of Indian worker deaths. In answer to a query in Parliament, the Government disclosed on Friday that the most significant number of fatalities of Indian labourers during this time occurred in the United Arab Emirates and Saudi Arabia. In the UAE, 2,454 Indian labourers perished in 2020. The number increased from 1,751 in 2019 to 2,710 in 2021. https://emiratesleaks.com/2022/07/uae-has-the-greatest-number-of-deaths-among-indian-labourers/?lang=enHuman Rights Watch 2021 Report on Dubai
https://www.hrw.org/world-report/2022/country-chapters/united-arab-emirates
|
|
|
Muz
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 15K,
Visits: 0
|
Geez there's a lot of assumptions going on here. If you actually watch the video nothing they say is particularly forceful, insulting, demanding, condescending or patronising.
Member since 2008.
|
|
|
Enzo Bearzot
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 4.5K,
Visits: 0
|
+xGeez there's a lot of assumptions going on here. If you actually watch the video nothing they say is particularly forceful, insulting, demanding, condescending or patronising. They could choose not to go if they feel so strongly about it.
|
|
|
Muz
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 15K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+xGeez there's a lot of assumptions going on here. If you actually watch the video nothing they say is particularly forceful, insulting, demanding, condescending or patronising. They could choose not to go if they feel so strongly about it. That's understood. I'm talking about the thread commentary here.
Member since 2008.
|
|
|
verrelli
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 162,
Visits: 0
|
I find it odd that the video featured such an eclectic group of players. Surely for maximum impact, the highest profile players would be included, which begs the question of whether guys like Hrustic, Mooy, Boyle, Mabil, Behich, Sainsbury were not asked for some inexplicable reason, or else declined to be involved, as is their right. Instead we had guys like D'Agostino and Devlin, who had only just been capped, as well as 4 goalkeepers (3 of which probably have a combined 5 caps since the last world cup). Rowles managed to stuff up his very simple line and D'Agostino looked like he'd filmed his on a mobile phone from Aldi! Seemed a bit amateurish overall rather than a really slick production. Kind of get the sense that Irvine would have been front and centre in leading the initiative, and that's not a criticism at all, but just an observation.
|
|
|
Davide82
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 12K,
Visits: 0
|
+xI find it odd that the video featured such an eclectic group of players. Surely for maximum impact, the highest profile players would be included, which begs the question of whether guys like Hrustic, Mooy, Boyle, Mabil, Behich, Sainsbury were not asked for some inexplicable reason, or else declined to be involved, as is their right. They're all holding out for retirement oil money
|
|
|
Monoethnic Social Club
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 11K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+xI find it odd that the video featured such an eclectic group of players. Surely for maximum impact, the highest profile players would be included, which begs the question of whether guys like Hrustic, Mooy, Boyle, Mabil, Behich, Sainsbury were not asked for some inexplicable reason, or else declined to be involved, as is their right. They're all holding out for retirement oil money I must admit, that was my first thought also.
|
|
|
TheDjentleman
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 362,
Visits: 0
|
Would have preferred a "You should have voted for us" video and be aggressively unhinged than this soft dialogue. I am so over this format.
Everybodys favourite lurker.
|
|
|
19-SU-58
|
|
Group: Banned Members
Posts: 2.5K,
Visits: 0
|
Maybe the socceroo's should glue and chain themselves to the goal posts in protest. It's the only way they'll be at the tournament for over a week.
Not a Phase, Not a Trend, SYDNEY UNITED till the END!
|
|
|
Monoethnic Social Club
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 11K,
Visits: 0
|
+xMaybe the socceroo's should glue and chain themselves to the goal posts in protest. It's the only way they'll be at the tournament for over a week. Hahahahahaha that IS funny dude. Sad but funny.
|
|
|
Monoethnic Social Club
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 11K,
Visits: 0
|
Has anyone heard from Tmmy Cahill after this statement BTW? Wonder what his take on it is?
|
|
|
jas88
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 5.8K,
Visits: 0
|
+xHas anyone heard from Tmmy Cahill after this statement BTW? Wonder what his take on it is? same as Beckham they legally cant bag them or they could lose their payout. he will be in Qatar for WC promoting it lol
|
|
|
LFC.
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 13K,
Visits: 0
|
|
|
|
ErogenousZone
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 4.6K,
Visits: 0
|
Tim Cahill is some sort of Qatar ambassador I believe.
|
|
|
LFC.
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 13K,
Visits: 0
|
+xTim Cahill is some sort of Qatar ambassador I believe. he's a Legacy Ambassador, with a few other ok ex players https://www.qatar2022.qa/en/legacy-ambassadors
Love Football
|
|
|
sydneyfc1987
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 10K,
Visits: 0
|
Eto, Cafu and Xavi? Yeah ok I guess lol
(VAR) IS NAVY BLUE
|
|
|
Muz
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 15K,
Visits: 0
|
You'll love this Enzo. Muz the 'lefty, woke, communist' was on Folau's side here. As an atheist I don't agree with anything he said and I think he's a giant flog for his stupid medieval beliefs. BUT no way do I think employment contracts should be written up that stop you from professing your beliefs publicly and privately. (As stupid as they may be to me and anyone else.) Ask any Moslem in the A League if he believes that same sex marriage should be a thing and I guarantee you, if he answers honestly, they'll say no. Folau was dudded and I'm glad he got paid out. But religious nutjobs have to remember free speech works both ways.
Member since 2008.
|
|
|
Davstar
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 9K,
Visits: 0
|
+x remember free speech works both ways. i think that is the thing we all agree on in Western Nations.....but in the scenario we are in i dont know if Qatar is a nation that believes in 'free speech' i dare say nations like Russia, UAE, China, Saudi Arabia etc Speech is censored and people are oppressed if they dont 'accept' what the governments law is then you essentially are silenced.... but ill reiterate i'd prefer to keep all this shit out of football it does nothing good for the game
these Kangaroos can play football - Ange P. (Intercontinental WC Play-offs 2017)
KEEP POLITICS OUT OF FOOTBALL
|
|
|
Enzo Bearzot
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 4.5K,
Visits: 0
|
+xYou'll love this Enzo. Muz the 'lefty, woke, communist' was on Folau's side here. As an atheist I don't agree with anything he said and I think he's a giant flog for his stupid medieval beliefs. BUT no way do I think employment contracts should be written up that stop you from professing your beliefs publicly and privately. (As stupid as they may be to me and anyone else.) Ask any Moslem in the A League if he believes that same sex marriage should be a thing and I guarantee you, if he answers honestly, they'll say no. Folau was dudded and I'm glad he got paid out. But religious nutjobs have to remember free speech works both ways. No issues at with that. Religions and religious people get ridiculed all the time ( some more than others). Nobody is limiting or seeking to do that that I'm aware of. The thing is for some people eg Pacifica's their religion is a core component of their identity, of who they are. For others, their sexuality is. But neither of has more "rights" than the other. And of course it certainly isn't for your employer to put limits on your self-expression and your right to association outside of the work environment. I was hoping that Folau's case would get tested in the High Court on this basis.
|
|
|
ErogenousZone
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 4.6K,
Visits: 0
|
I thought the statement was stunning & brave.
|
|
|
Davstar
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 9K,
Visits: 0
|
https://www.news.com.au/sport/football/qatars-subtle-australia-dig-in-response-to-criticism-from-the-socceroos/news-story/5ed4eebebf9635824a08a41fe54e74b2fair response from Qatar it isnt like Australia is some paradise for human rights bring up refugee treatment and Aboriginals i mean it was only 55 years ago we had a 'white Australia Policy' this is why we should just keep our mouth shut... just another 'reason' to keep this shit away from football
these Kangaroos can play football - Ange P. (Intercontinental WC Play-offs 2017)
KEEP POLITICS OUT OF FOOTBALL
|
|
|
Balin Trev
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 3.7K,
Visits: 0
|

Folau must be a fan 🤘 
|
|
|