|
Decentric 2
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 3.1K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x id put kuol and toure around mid league 1 level with toure slightly higher. Im not saying these are world class finishers, but they are a lot better than 0 goals from 60 shots Btw I recall maybe 2 shots going into row z and a lot of gettable misses. Im skeptical of that claim I also dug up shots on target and close misses. A close miss is defined as missing the goal by circa 50 cm or half a metre. AUS V JORDAN Shots on target: Aus 5, Jordan 2. Close misses : Aus 4, Jordan 1. AUS V INDONESIA Shots on target : Aus 8, Indonesia 1 ( goal). Close misses: Aus 7, Indonesia 5. AUS V QATAR Shots on target : Aus 10, Qatar 1. Close misses : Aus 8, Qatar 4. TOTAL - close misses or shots on target: Aus 42, opposition 14. This is a ratio of 3:1 favouring Aus. It also equals 75% Aus, 25% Opposition, for shots on target or close misses over the three games. However, of the low number of opposition shots, 14 out of 18 total number of shots were close misses or on target. Yeah if u are getting your shots in transition you often have higher quality chances. So 14 out of 18 is no surprise. To miss so many shots on target or near misses (very few row zs it seems) needs an explanation. I favour mentality over luck. It would be interesting to know if there is a club side that had 3 games in a row like that Good question? I remember John Aloisi coaching Melb City/Heart having an extraordinary bad luck playing counter attacking football. They went so close on frequent occasions, without scoring.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Monoethnic Social Club
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 11K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+xAUS v QATAR U23s. * Defensive half passing stats. AUS completed 218 passes at 97%. QATAR 52 passes at 89%. * Attacking half passes. AUS completed 275 passes at 92%. QATAR 40 at 77%. * Totals passes for whole pitch AUS COMPETED 493 passes at 94%. QATAR 92 passes at 83%. * Possession based on passes. AUS had 84% possession, QATAR had 16%. *Ball carries of 15 metres plus - AUS 11, QATAR 10. * Shots at goal - AUS 20, QATAR 9. I've just said to someone off line, this is the most dominant I've ever recorded stats for any Aussie teams after 6 odd years doing it from 2008 - 2014 for the senior Socceroos. Except with 60 shots at goal over the 3 games by AUS, compared to 18 in total by JORDAN, INDONESIA AND QATAR combined over the 3 games, it is the worst shooting performance ever! Later I'll go into more posts about who had how many shots at goal for AUS U23s. What was the reason why they couldn't score a goal in any of the games, was it down to the quality of the chance creation or shot creation? Once again an Australian team struggling to score and break down a low block defence, something for Ernie Merrick to fix as the disruptor going forward. I'm quite concerned about Ernie Merrick being an analyst. He was already a pro accredited coach in the old system, and to the best of my knowledge has not retrained in the new revamped coaching methodology since 2008. I know coaches who have had old Soccer Aus licences. They have just had to attend national conferences as a participants, and their old badges are reinstated. One of the assessors told me a C Licence in 2012 was a more highly credentialled accreditation than an A Licence prior to 2005. Merrick has not been forced to adopt the newer methods, and be assessed, like all the A L coaches who've trained since 2008 onwards have learned. The irony is in response to your first point I don't think any team had the deep defensive block/Partial Press against the Olyroos that the senior Socceroos have encountered, but more of a Half Press, which is still a conservative measure in BPO. What is pleasing is that the Olyroos played so many balls into the pen box with players in support, whilst the senior Socceroos can't do it against arguably inferior opposition to what the senior Socceroos have been playing. Toure is an interesting case in point. He had 2-3 shots against Jordan from his 30 odd mins, 7 shots ( including a pen) as a starter against Indonesia and 0 shots as a starter against Qatar. In the era when I used to record stats for comparative criterion, Cahill playing as central striker averaged 4-5, or 5-6 shots per game. Toure got some good shots in. He hit the post at least once, and went close on a number of occasions with shots just wide or executing difficult shots for the keeper to save, from well struck balls with good body position. But he didn't score, which is of paramount importance. A Kuol got at least 2 shots against Jordan ( couldn't identify a few of the perpetrators of the 15 shots), possibly had 0 against Indonesia and 1 against Qatar. Milanovic as a winger had at least 1 shot against Jordan, 0 against Indonesia off the bench and 5 against Qatar. He missed an open goal when he headed it wide with 1 shot! Brook as a winger had at least 1 shot against Jordan, which nearly scored as the keeper just deflected it from going into the corner; at least 3 shots off the bench against Indonesia; and at least 7 shots as a starter against Qatar. Again in one of the latter two games it involved another fingertip save from the opposition keeper to one of Brook's shots and a number of very close Brook misses. There were easily enough good shots created by Aus to score many more goals than the 3 opponents. They scored 1 goal from 18 shots at our goal, whilst we scored 0 from 60 shots at their goals. I recorded we hit the woodwork 3-4 times too. Yep given we had an experienced dutch TD overhaul our coach and player development this feels like a weird move for FA and board to appoint Merrick in this important role. Anyway, the final third play is something to work on, clearly we struggled in the final third however I dont think it reflects on the players ability and more through the coaching and preparation they had. This is the hardest bit to produce players with the ability to pierce the defence, a rare commodity in football in this country. And yet the Aleague produces a higher goals per game ratio than most other leagues? I dont watch any of it but how is this possible these technical gifted, NC produced, new platinum generation players can pierce Aleague defences but not those of Indonesia or Jordan? C'mon man there is a problem, we all have to agree on how to fix it. 2 different issues here, producing players with the ability to pierce defences & scoring against Indonesia & Jordan. We don't produce enough world class playmakers or wingers with the ability to break down defences, something we are working on. As for not scoring against Indonesia or Jordan, maybe this is because the players are Liverpool fans & watching re-runs of Nunez & Salah. I think the Olyroos, like Liverpool has been creating chances & not scoring. Hahahha I would be REALLY worried if Nunez or Salah couldn't score against Indoensian defences. HAHAHAHAAHAHAHA Yeah not good to lose to Jordan, some ex European Champion lost to Georgia, so things could be worse. I know, they really could... Hope the Portuguese redeem themselves at this years Euros :)
|
|
|
|
|
Monoethnic Social Club
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 11K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x id put kuol and toure around mid league 1 level with toure slightly higher. Im not saying these are world class finishers, but they are a lot better than 0 goals from 60 shots Btw I recall maybe 2 shots going into row z and a lot of gettable misses. Im skeptical of that claim I also dug up shots on target and close misses. A close miss is defined as missing the goal by circa 50 cm or half a metre. AUS V JORDAN Shots on target: Aus 5, Jordan 2. Close misses : Aus 4, Jordan 1. AUS V INDONESIA Shots on target : Aus 8, Indonesia 1 ( goal). Close misses: Aus 7, Indonesia 5. AUS V QATAR Shots on target : Aus 10, Qatar 1. Close misses : Aus 8, Qatar 4. TOTAL - close misses or shots on target: Aus 42, opposition 14. This is a ratio of 3:1 favouring Aus. It also equals 75% Aus, 25% Opposition, for shots on target or close misses over the three games. However, of the low number of opposition shots, 14 out of 18 total number of shots were close misses or on target. Yeah if u are getting your shots in transition you often have higher quality chances. So 14 out of 18 is no surprise. To miss so many shots on target or near misses (very few row zs it seems) needs an explanation. I favour mentality over luck. It would be interesting to know if there is a club side that had 3 games in a row like that Not sure why you pose a question like that, nor if you really want an answer.?... Ill just allow the endless cycle to continue..
|
|
|
|
|
Bunch of Hacks
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 2.8K,
Visits: 0
|
+xWe didn't help ourselves score by not picking our best forward. Coaching, team selection, injuries, returns from injuries all contributed as well. Agree.. madness not picking our best player. Has potentially jeopardised the development of the entire '24 crop as the olympics are important to help our boys get moves
|
|
|
|
|
grazorblade
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 19K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+xWe didn't help ourselves score by not picking our best forward. Coaching, team selection, injuries, returns from injuries all contributed as well. Agree.. madness not picking our best player. Has potentially jeopardised the development of the entire '24 crop as the olympics are important to help our boys get moves Huge distraction for the players too, prepping for a major tournament and the only media is on who is not there
|
|
|
|
|
robbos
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 3.8K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+xAUS v QATAR U23s. * Defensive half passing stats. AUS completed 218 passes at 97%. QATAR 52 passes at 89%. * Attacking half passes. AUS completed 275 passes at 92%. QATAR 40 at 77%. * Totals passes for whole pitch AUS COMPETED 493 passes at 94%. QATAR 92 passes at 83%. * Possession based on passes. AUS had 84% possession, QATAR had 16%. *Ball carries of 15 metres plus - AUS 11, QATAR 10. * Shots at goal - AUS 20, QATAR 9. I've just said to someone off line, this is the most dominant I've ever recorded stats for any Aussie teams after 6 odd years doing it from 2008 - 2014 for the senior Socceroos. Except with 60 shots at goal over the 3 games by AUS, compared to 18 in total by JORDAN, INDONESIA AND QATAR combined over the 3 games, it is the worst shooting performance ever! Later I'll go into more posts about who had how many shots at goal for AUS U23s. What was the reason why they couldn't score a goal in any of the games, was it down to the quality of the chance creation or shot creation? Once again an Australian team struggling to score and break down a low block defence, something for Ernie Merrick to fix as the disruptor going forward. I'm quite concerned about Ernie Merrick being an analyst. He was already a pro accredited coach in the old system, and to the best of my knowledge has not retrained in the new revamped coaching methodology since 2008. I know coaches who have had old Soccer Aus licences. They have just had to attend national conferences as a participants, and their old badges are reinstated. One of the assessors told me a C Licence in 2012 was a more highly credentialled accreditation than an A Licence prior to 2005. Merrick has not been forced to adopt the newer methods, and be assessed, like all the A L coaches who've trained since 2008 onwards have learned. The irony is in response to your first point I don't think any team had the deep defensive block/Partial Press against the Olyroos that the senior Socceroos have encountered, but more of a Half Press, which is still a conservative measure in BPO. What is pleasing is that the Olyroos played so many balls into the pen box with players in support, whilst the senior Socceroos can't do it against arguably inferior opposition to what the senior Socceroos have been playing. Toure is an interesting case in point. He had 2-3 shots against Jordan from his 30 odd mins, 7 shots ( including a pen) as a starter against Indonesia and 0 shots as a starter against Qatar. In the era when I used to record stats for comparative criterion, Cahill playing as central striker averaged 4-5, or 5-6 shots per game. Toure got some good shots in. He hit the post at least once, and went close on a number of occasions with shots just wide or executing difficult shots for the keeper to save, from well struck balls with good body position. But he didn't score, which is of paramount importance. A Kuol got at least 2 shots against Jordan ( couldn't identify a few of the perpetrators of the 15 shots), possibly had 0 against Indonesia and 1 against Qatar. Milanovic as a winger had at least 1 shot against Jordan, 0 against Indonesia off the bench and 5 against Qatar. He missed an open goal when he headed it wide with 1 shot! Brook as a winger had at least 1 shot against Jordan, which nearly scored as the keeper just deflected it from going into the corner; at least 3 shots off the bench against Indonesia; and at least 7 shots as a starter against Qatar. Again in one of the latter two games it involved another fingertip save from the opposition keeper to one of Brook's shots and a number of very close Brook misses. There were easily enough good shots created by Aus to score many more goals than the 3 opponents. They scored 1 goal from 18 shots at our goal, whilst we scored 0 from 60 shots at their goals. I recorded we hit the woodwork 3-4 times too. Yep given we had an experienced dutch TD overhaul our coach and player development this feels like a weird move for FA and board to appoint Merrick in this important role. Anyway, the final third play is something to work on, clearly we struggled in the final third however I dont think it reflects on the players ability and more through the coaching and preparation they had. This is the hardest bit to produce players with the ability to pierce the defence, a rare commodity in football in this country. And yet the Aleague produces a higher goals per game ratio than most other leagues? I dont watch any of it but how is this possible these technical gifted, NC produced, new platinum generation players can pierce Aleague defences but not those of Indonesia or Jordan? C'mon man there is a problem, we all have to agree on how to fix it. 2 different issues here, producing players with the ability to pierce defences & scoring against Indonesia & Jordan. We don't produce enough world class playmakers or wingers with the ability to break down defences, something we are working on. As for not scoring against Indonesia or Jordan, maybe this is because the players are Liverpool fans & watching re-runs of Nunez & Salah. I think the Olyroos, like Liverpool has been creating chances & not scoring. Hahahha I would be REALLY worried if Nunez or Salah couldn't score against Indoensian defences. HAHAHAHAAHAHAHA Yeah not good to lose to Jordan, some ex European Champion lost to Georgia, so things could be worse. I know, they really could... Hope the Portuguese redeem themselves at this years Euros :)  Dream on. Enjoy watching.
|
|
|
|
|
Monoethnic Social Club
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 11K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+xAUS v QATAR U23s. * Defensive half passing stats. AUS completed 218 passes at 97%. QATAR 52 passes at 89%. * Attacking half passes. AUS completed 275 passes at 92%. QATAR 40 at 77%. * Totals passes for whole pitch AUS COMPETED 493 passes at 94%. QATAR 92 passes at 83%. * Possession based on passes. AUS had 84% possession, QATAR had 16%. *Ball carries of 15 metres plus - AUS 11, QATAR 10. * Shots at goal - AUS 20, QATAR 9. I've just said to someone off line, this is the most dominant I've ever recorded stats for any Aussie teams after 6 odd years doing it from 2008 - 2014 for the senior Socceroos. Except with 60 shots at goal over the 3 games by AUS, compared to 18 in total by JORDAN, INDONESIA AND QATAR combined over the 3 games, it is the worst shooting performance ever! Later I'll go into more posts about who had how many shots at goal for AUS U23s. What was the reason why they couldn't score a goal in any of the games, was it down to the quality of the chance creation or shot creation? Once again an Australian team struggling to score and break down a low block defence, something for Ernie Merrick to fix as the disruptor going forward. I'm quite concerned about Ernie Merrick being an analyst. He was already a pro accredited coach in the old system, and to the best of my knowledge has not retrained in the new revamped coaching methodology since 2008. I know coaches who have had old Soccer Aus licences. They have just had to attend national conferences as a participants, and their old badges are reinstated. One of the assessors told me a C Licence in 2012 was a more highly credentialled accreditation than an A Licence prior to 2005. Merrick has not been forced to adopt the newer methods, and be assessed, like all the A L coaches who've trained since 2008 onwards have learned. The irony is in response to your first point I don't think any team had the deep defensive block/Partial Press against the Olyroos that the senior Socceroos have encountered, but more of a Half Press, which is still a conservative measure in BPO. What is pleasing is that the Olyroos played so many balls into the pen box with players in support, whilst the senior Socceroos can't do it against arguably inferior opposition to what the senior Socceroos have been playing. Toure is an interesting case in point. He had 2-3 shots against Jordan from his 30 odd mins, 7 shots ( including a pen) as a starter against Indonesia and 0 shots as a starter against Qatar. In the era when I used to record stats for comparative criterion, Cahill playing as central striker averaged 4-5, or 5-6 shots per game. Toure got some good shots in. He hit the post at least once, and went close on a number of occasions with shots just wide or executing difficult shots for the keeper to save, from well struck balls with good body position. But he didn't score, which is of paramount importance. A Kuol got at least 2 shots against Jordan ( couldn't identify a few of the perpetrators of the 15 shots), possibly had 0 against Indonesia and 1 against Qatar. Milanovic as a winger had at least 1 shot against Jordan, 0 against Indonesia off the bench and 5 against Qatar. He missed an open goal when he headed it wide with 1 shot! Brook as a winger had at least 1 shot against Jordan, which nearly scored as the keeper just deflected it from going into the corner; at least 3 shots off the bench against Indonesia; and at least 7 shots as a starter against Qatar. Again in one of the latter two games it involved another fingertip save from the opposition keeper to one of Brook's shots and a number of very close Brook misses. There were easily enough good shots created by Aus to score many more goals than the 3 opponents. They scored 1 goal from 18 shots at our goal, whilst we scored 0 from 60 shots at their goals. I recorded we hit the woodwork 3-4 times too. Yep given we had an experienced dutch TD overhaul our coach and player development this feels like a weird move for FA and board to appoint Merrick in this important role. Anyway, the final third play is something to work on, clearly we struggled in the final third however I dont think it reflects on the players ability and more through the coaching and preparation they had. This is the hardest bit to produce players with the ability to pierce the defence, a rare commodity in football in this country. And yet the Aleague produces a higher goals per game ratio than most other leagues? I dont watch any of it but how is this possible these technical gifted, NC produced, new platinum generation players can pierce Aleague defences but not those of Indonesia or Jordan? C'mon man there is a problem, we all have to agree on how to fix it. 2 different issues here, producing players with the ability to pierce defences & scoring against Indonesia & Jordan. We don't produce enough world class playmakers or wingers with the ability to break down defences, something we are working on. As for not scoring against Indonesia or Jordan, maybe this is because the players are Liverpool fans & watching re-runs of Nunez & Salah. I think the Olyroos, like Liverpool has been creating chances & not scoring. Hahahha I would be REALLY worried if Nunez or Salah couldn't score against Indoensian defences. HAHAHAHAAHAHAHA Yeah not good to lose to Jordan, some ex European Champion lost to Georgia, so things could be worse. I know, they really could... Hope the Portuguese redeem themselves at this years Euros :)  Dream on. Enjoy watching. Hahahahaha c'mon man, youve gotta agree that was a golden come back? hahahahahahahhahaha Don't be so serious. lol
|
|
|
|
|
robbos
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 3.8K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+xAUS v QATAR U23s. * Defensive half passing stats. AUS completed 218 passes at 97%. QATAR 52 passes at 89%. * Attacking half passes. AUS completed 275 passes at 92%. QATAR 40 at 77%. * Totals passes for whole pitch AUS COMPETED 493 passes at 94%. QATAR 92 passes at 83%. * Possession based on passes. AUS had 84% possession, QATAR had 16%. *Ball carries of 15 metres plus - AUS 11, QATAR 10. * Shots at goal - AUS 20, QATAR 9. I've just said to someone off line, this is the most dominant I've ever recorded stats for any Aussie teams after 6 odd years doing it from 2008 - 2014 for the senior Socceroos. Except with 60 shots at goal over the 3 games by AUS, compared to 18 in total by JORDAN, INDONESIA AND QATAR combined over the 3 games, it is the worst shooting performance ever! Later I'll go into more posts about who had how many shots at goal for AUS U23s. What was the reason why they couldn't score a goal in any of the games, was it down to the quality of the chance creation or shot creation? Once again an Australian team struggling to score and break down a low block defence, something for Ernie Merrick to fix as the disruptor going forward. I'm quite concerned about Ernie Merrick being an analyst. He was already a pro accredited coach in the old system, and to the best of my knowledge has not retrained in the new revamped coaching methodology since 2008. I know coaches who have had old Soccer Aus licences. They have just had to attend national conferences as a participants, and their old badges are reinstated. One of the assessors told me a C Licence in 2012 was a more highly credentialled accreditation than an A Licence prior to 2005. Merrick has not been forced to adopt the newer methods, and be assessed, like all the A L coaches who've trained since 2008 onwards have learned. The irony is in response to your first point I don't think any team had the deep defensive block/Partial Press against the Olyroos that the senior Socceroos have encountered, but more of a Half Press, which is still a conservative measure in BPO. What is pleasing is that the Olyroos played so many balls into the pen box with players in support, whilst the senior Socceroos can't do it against arguably inferior opposition to what the senior Socceroos have been playing. Toure is an interesting case in point. He had 2-3 shots against Jordan from his 30 odd mins, 7 shots ( including a pen) as a starter against Indonesia and 0 shots as a starter against Qatar. In the era when I used to record stats for comparative criterion, Cahill playing as central striker averaged 4-5, or 5-6 shots per game. Toure got some good shots in. He hit the post at least once, and went close on a number of occasions with shots just wide or executing difficult shots for the keeper to save, from well struck balls with good body position. But he didn't score, which is of paramount importance. A Kuol got at least 2 shots against Jordan ( couldn't identify a few of the perpetrators of the 15 shots), possibly had 0 against Indonesia and 1 against Qatar. Milanovic as a winger had at least 1 shot against Jordan, 0 against Indonesia off the bench and 5 against Qatar. He missed an open goal when he headed it wide with 1 shot! Brook as a winger had at least 1 shot against Jordan, which nearly scored as the keeper just deflected it from going into the corner; at least 3 shots off the bench against Indonesia; and at least 7 shots as a starter against Qatar. Again in one of the latter two games it involved another fingertip save from the opposition keeper to one of Brook's shots and a number of very close Brook misses. There were easily enough good shots created by Aus to score many more goals than the 3 opponents. They scored 1 goal from 18 shots at our goal, whilst we scored 0 from 60 shots at their goals. I recorded we hit the woodwork 3-4 times too. Yep given we had an experienced dutch TD overhaul our coach and player development this feels like a weird move for FA and board to appoint Merrick in this important role. Anyway, the final third play is something to work on, clearly we struggled in the final third however I dont think it reflects on the players ability and more through the coaching and preparation they had. This is the hardest bit to produce players with the ability to pierce the defence, a rare commodity in football in this country. And yet the Aleague produces a higher goals per game ratio than most other leagues? I dont watch any of it but how is this possible these technical gifted, NC produced, new platinum generation players can pierce Aleague defences but not those of Indonesia or Jordan? C'mon man there is a problem, we all have to agree on how to fix it. 2 different issues here, producing players with the ability to pierce defences & scoring against Indonesia & Jordan. We don't produce enough world class playmakers or wingers with the ability to break down defences, something we are working on. As for not scoring against Indonesia or Jordan, maybe this is because the players are Liverpool fans & watching re-runs of Nunez & Salah. I think the Olyroos, like Liverpool has been creating chances & not scoring. Hahahha I would be REALLY worried if Nunez or Salah couldn't score against Indoensian defences. HAHAHAHAAHAHAHA Yeah not good to lose to Jordan, some ex European Champion lost to Georgia, so things could be worse. I know, they really could... Hope the Portuguese redeem themselves at this years Euros :)  Dream on. Enjoy watching. Hahahahaha c'mon man, youve gotta agree that was a golden come back? hahahahahahahhahaha Don't be so serious. lol I'm chilled. Portugal in Euros, Derby promoted, SFC in the semis of the A-League, Lots of Young Aussies also doing well in Europe, Mariners winning an Asian Cup. Lots of football to watch.
|
|
|
|
|
Monoethnic Social Club
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 11K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+xAUS v QATAR U23s. * Defensive half passing stats. AUS completed 218 passes at 97%. QATAR 52 passes at 89%. * Attacking half passes. AUS completed 275 passes at 92%. QATAR 40 at 77%. * Totals passes for whole pitch AUS COMPETED 493 passes at 94%. QATAR 92 passes at 83%. * Possession based on passes. AUS had 84% possession, QATAR had 16%. *Ball carries of 15 metres plus - AUS 11, QATAR 10. * Shots at goal - AUS 20, QATAR 9. I've just said to someone off line, this is the most dominant I've ever recorded stats for any Aussie teams after 6 odd years doing it from 2008 - 2014 for the senior Socceroos. Except with 60 shots at goal over the 3 games by AUS, compared to 18 in total by JORDAN, INDONESIA AND QATAR combined over the 3 games, it is the worst shooting performance ever! Later I'll go into more posts about who had how many shots at goal for AUS U23s. What was the reason why they couldn't score a goal in any of the games, was it down to the quality of the chance creation or shot creation? Once again an Australian team struggling to score and break down a low block defence, something for Ernie Merrick to fix as the disruptor going forward. I'm quite concerned about Ernie Merrick being an analyst. He was already a pro accredited coach in the old system, and to the best of my knowledge has not retrained in the new revamped coaching methodology since 2008. I know coaches who have had old Soccer Aus licences. They have just had to attend national conferences as a participants, and their old badges are reinstated. One of the assessors told me a C Licence in 2012 was a more highly credentialled accreditation than an A Licence prior to 2005. Merrick has not been forced to adopt the newer methods, and be assessed, like all the A L coaches who've trained since 2008 onwards have learned. The irony is in response to your first point I don't think any team had the deep defensive block/Partial Press against the Olyroos that the senior Socceroos have encountered, but more of a Half Press, which is still a conservative measure in BPO. What is pleasing is that the Olyroos played so many balls into the pen box with players in support, whilst the senior Socceroos can't do it against arguably inferior opposition to what the senior Socceroos have been playing. Toure is an interesting case in point. He had 2-3 shots against Jordan from his 30 odd mins, 7 shots ( including a pen) as a starter against Indonesia and 0 shots as a starter against Qatar. In the era when I used to record stats for comparative criterion, Cahill playing as central striker averaged 4-5, or 5-6 shots per game. Toure got some good shots in. He hit the post at least once, and went close on a number of occasions with shots just wide or executing difficult shots for the keeper to save, from well struck balls with good body position. But he didn't score, which is of paramount importance. A Kuol got at least 2 shots against Jordan ( couldn't identify a few of the perpetrators of the 15 shots), possibly had 0 against Indonesia and 1 against Qatar. Milanovic as a winger had at least 1 shot against Jordan, 0 against Indonesia off the bench and 5 against Qatar. He missed an open goal when he headed it wide with 1 shot! Brook as a winger had at least 1 shot against Jordan, which nearly scored as the keeper just deflected it from going into the corner; at least 3 shots off the bench against Indonesia; and at least 7 shots as a starter against Qatar. Again in one of the latter two games it involved another fingertip save from the opposition keeper to one of Brook's shots and a number of very close Brook misses. There were easily enough good shots created by Aus to score many more goals than the 3 opponents. They scored 1 goal from 18 shots at our goal, whilst we scored 0 from 60 shots at their goals. I recorded we hit the woodwork 3-4 times too. Yep given we had an experienced dutch TD overhaul our coach and player development this feels like a weird move for FA and board to appoint Merrick in this important role. Anyway, the final third play is something to work on, clearly we struggled in the final third however I dont think it reflects on the players ability and more through the coaching and preparation they had. This is the hardest bit to produce players with the ability to pierce the defence, a rare commodity in football in this country. And yet the Aleague produces a higher goals per game ratio than most other leagues? I dont watch any of it but how is this possible these technical gifted, NC produced, new platinum generation players can pierce Aleague defences but not those of Indonesia or Jordan? C'mon man there is a problem, we all have to agree on how to fix it. 2 different issues here, producing players with the ability to pierce defences & scoring against Indonesia & Jordan. We don't produce enough world class playmakers or wingers with the ability to break down defences, something we are working on. As for not scoring against Indonesia or Jordan, maybe this is because the players are Liverpool fans & watching re-runs of Nunez & Salah. I think the Olyroos, like Liverpool has been creating chances & not scoring. Hahahha I would be REALLY worried if Nunez or Salah couldn't score against Indoensian defences. HAHAHAHAAHAHAHA Yeah not good to lose to Jordan, some ex European Champion lost to Georgia, so things could be worse. I know, they really could... Hope the Portuguese redeem themselves at this years Euros :)  Dream on. Enjoy watching. Hahahahaha c'mon man, youve gotta agree that was a golden come back? hahahahahahahhahaha Don't be so serious. lol I'm chilled. Portugal in Euros, Derby promoted, SFC in the semis of the A-League, Lots of Young Aussies also doing well in Europe, Mariners winning an Asian Cup. Lots of football to watch. Seems like you've got everything sorted. Enjoy.
|
|
|
|
|
Barca4Life
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 13K,
Visits: 0
|
After reading through the comments on here is there a way this could be improved in the future? Especially that these tournaments are played in non FIFA windows I think this could continue to be a challenge for the Olyroos.
Very hard to prep when then they had no practice games going into the first game after travelling to the other side of the world, but we have to question the coaching and selection of players.
It's very important they find solutions quickly as Asian football has raised its level, probably higher that it's ever been since we joined in 2006 given the depth that is there now.
|
|
|
|
|
grazorblade
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 19K,
Visits: 0
|
+xAfter reading through the comments on here is there a way this could be improved in the future? Especially that these tournaments are played in non FIFA windows I think this could continue to be a challenge for the Olyroos. Very hard to prep when then they had no practice games going into the first game after travelling to the other side of the world, but we have to question the coaching and selection of players. It's very important they find solutions quickly as Asian football has raised its level, probably higher that it's ever been since we joined in 2006 given the depth that is there now. I think to be honest the only room for growth is a better coach and a lead in camp at least for local based players. Get a club coach with experience Unless the tournament goes into a fifa window, getting better players just means more players unavailable. Apparently 15 euro based players were blocked by their clubs this time (!) Not sure how much influence we have over the afc to change the qual format to put matches in a fifa window Having said all that i think arnolds two successful qualification campaigns in asia in 2008 and 2018 show a good coach is enough of a boost to qualify
|
|
|
|