|
Davis_Patik
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 1.6K,
Visits: 0
|
Hot Spot is also far from perfect as well, it apparently has problems with tiny edges on the outside of an opened faced flashing bat. They are tools that need to be understood and used for what they can do.
What Hawkeye can do is eliminate LBWs that are likes Cook's but are given not out or LBWs that are given when it was going to miss the stumps by a large margin. That is what it has been brought in to eliminate, anything else is just a bonus at this stage.
Edited by Davis_Patik: 5/8/2013 09:36:17 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vaughn2111
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 4K,
Visits: 0
|
afromanGT wrote:Davis_Patik wrote:I think the idea is that hawkeye has a margin of error, so when the ball only just clips the stumps there is a reasonable chance hawkeye has it slightly wrong and it was actually missing. So hawkeye cannot say with certainty that it is out or not out so what the umpire has said goes. Where as if the ball is shown as hitting the middle stump like with Cook haweye cannot be wrong to the extent that the ball had any chance of missing the stumps.
However it is a bit of a mess. Hopefully hawkeye can be improved so that it can be more certain about those close LBWs
Edited by Davis_Patik: 5/8/2013 09:29:24 PM What's the point in using the Hawkeye for reviews if it's inaccurate then? Because that looked pretty straightforward LBW to me. It's not incarnate, they've just factored in the margin for error - which is 100% logical because the technology is only predicting the line of the ball.
|
|
|
|
|
Davis_Patik
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 1.6K,
Visits: 0
|
afromanGT wrote:Davis_Patik wrote:I think the idea is that hawkeye has a margin of error, so when the ball only just clips the stumps there is a reasonable chance hawkeye has it slightly wrong and it was actually missing. So hawkeye cannot say with certainty that it is out or not out so what the umpire has said goes. Where as if the ball is shown as hitting the middle stump like with Cook haweye cannot be wrong to the extent that the ball had any chance of missing the stumps.
However it is a bit of a mess. Hopefully hawkeye can be improved so that it can be more certain about those close LBWs
Edited by Davis_Patik: 5/8/2013 09:29:24 PM What's the point in using the Hawkeye for reviews if it's inaccurate then? Because that looked pretty straightforward LBW to me. It eliminates big mistakes even if it cannot decide on really close LBWs definitively. This is still a big improvement, if used properly, over having only an umpire.
|
|
|
|
|
Davis_Patik
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 1.6K,
Visits: 0
|
Clarke drops Root, blast it.
|
|
|
|
|
Vaughn2111
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 4K,
Visits: 0
|
Oh no. Clarke drops root at second slip.
Edited by vaughn2111: 5/8/2013 09:40:58 PM
|
|
|
|
|
aufc_ole
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 7K,
Visits: 0
|
I hope that doesn't come back to hurt us...
|
|
|
|
|
Vaughn2111
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 4K,
Visits: 0
|
Davis_Patik wrote:afromanGT wrote:Davis_Patik wrote:I think the idea is that hawkeye has a margin of error, so when the ball only just clips the stumps there is a reasonable chance hawkeye has it slightly wrong and it was actually missing. So hawkeye cannot say with certainty that it is out or not out so what the umpire has said goes. Where as if the ball is shown as hitting the middle stump like with Cook haweye cannot be wrong to the extent that the ball had any chance of missing the stumps.
However it is a bit of a mess. Hopefully hawkeye can be improved so that it can be more certain about those close LBWs
Edited by Davis_Patik: 5/8/2013 09:29:24 PM What's the point in using the Hawkeye for reviews if it's inaccurate then? Because that looked pretty straightforward LBW to me. It eliminates big mistakes even if it cannot decide on really close LBWs definitively. This is still a big improvement, if used properly, over having only an umpire. And again, the point of the technology is to get rid of the howler, not to get 100% correct decisions.
|
|
|
|
|
Vaughn2111
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 4K,
Visits: 0
|
This is poor from Pietersen. Hyper-aggressive batting is not what england need. I really think he lacks the mentality for this situation.
|
|
|
|
|
Glory Recruit
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 13K,
Visits: 0
|
get the fuck out!
|
|
|
|
|
Glory Recruit
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 13K,
Visits: 0
|
damnit.
|
|
|
|
|
Vaughn2111
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 4K,
Visits: 0
|
That's a howler, nothing in that.
There is a little noise, but nothing on the bat. Same as the Khawaja decision.
Edited by vaughn2111: 5/8/2013 09:46:52 PM
|
|
|
|
|
Glory Recruit
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 13K,
Visits: 0
|
ahahahahaahaha
|
|
|
|
|
Davis_Patik
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 1.6K,
Visits: 0
|
Pietersen gone!!!!
|
|
|
|
|
afromanGT
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 77K,
Visits: 0
|
Nothing better than seeing Pietersen cracking the shits.
|
|
|
|
|
Davis_Patik
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 1.6K,
Visits: 0
|
Hot Spot does not give false positives but does give false negatives. So seeing a spot is proof, not seeing a spot is not proof.
|
|
|
|
|
Vaughn2111
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 4K,
Visits: 0
|
Snicko showed the noise, someone in the crowd must have sneezed. :p
|
|
|
|
|
aufc_ole
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 7K,
Visits: 0
|
Nothing on hot spot but something on snicko
|
|
|
|
|
afromanGT
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 77K,
Visits: 0
|
DP wrote:Hot Spot is also far from perfect as well, it apparently has problems with tiny edges on the outside of an opened faced flashing bat. Funny you should say that :lol:
|
|
|
|
|
Vaughn2111
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 4K,
Visits: 0
|
Davis_Patik wrote:Hot Spot does not give false positives but does give false negatives. So seeing a spot is proof, not seeing a spot is not proof. Spot on from Nasser Husain - on field decision was out. It's not DRS' fault. Wind right behind the Aussies here. Bell is the last key wicket we need.
|
|
|
|
|
afromanGT
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 77K,
Visits: 0
|
Vaughn2111 wrote:Snicko showed the noise, someone in the crowd must have sneezed. :p Snicko only showed something because Pietersen's a twat.
|
|
|
|
|
Vaughn2111
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 4K,
Visits: 0
|
Australia have clearly thrown in the towel here. #afrologic
:lol:
|
|
|
|
|
Davis_Patik
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 1.6K,
Visits: 0
|
Clarke bowling!!!!
|
|
|
|
|
Davis_Patik
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 1.6K,
Visits: 0
|
Vaughn2111 wrote:Australia have clearly thrown in the towel here. #afrologic
:lol: LOL
|
|
|
|
|
Vaughn2111
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 4K,
Visits: 0
|
Great session. Not only 3 wickets, but the best 3 wickets to get in that session. here's hoping the rain stays away.
Just need to get Bell. Root and Bairstow are a bit too green to hold out the onslaught.
|
|
|
|
|
afromanGT
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 77K,
Visits: 0
|
Vaughn2111 wrote:Australia have clearly thrown in the towel here. #afrologic
:lol: If the radar is anything to go off, it's going to bucket with rain after lunch.
|
|
|
|
|
aufc_ole
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 7K,
Visits: 0
|
:lol: 
|
|
|
|
|
Davis_Patik
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 1.6K,
Visits: 0
|
Bell - Prior partnership might be the most troubling one for Australia although Prior has not been in great form.
|
|
|
|
|
Benjo
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 15K,
Visits: 0
|
Howler of a decision by the third umpire to find KP out. He's an asshole, but that doesn't change the fact there was little proof he was out.
|
|
|
|
|
afromanGT
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 77K,
Visits: 0
|
Benjo wrote:Howler of a decision by the third umpire to find KP out. He's an asshole, but that doesn't change the fact there was little proof he was out. The Umpire gave him out. There wasn't enough evidence to overturn the decision. There was a noise with a hard transient and the ball starts spinning faster as it gets past his bat. He edged it.
|
|
|
|
|
Roar_Brisbane
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 14K,
Visits: 0
|
Light looks bad.
|
|
|
|