Socceroos v Chile - June 2011 - Sydney or Melbourne


Socceroos v Chile - June 2011 - Sydney or Melbourne

Author
Message
Mr
Mr
World Class
World Class (6.1K reputation)World Class (6.1K reputation)World Class (6.1K reputation)World Class (6.1K reputation)World Class (6.1K reputation)World Class (6.1K reputation)World Class (6.1K reputation)World Class (6.1K reputation)World Class (6.1K reputation)World Class (6.1K reputation)World Class (6.1K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 6K, Visits: 0
Per the subject line.
Joffa
Joffa
Legend
Legend (86K reputation)Legend (86K reputation)Legend (86K reputation)Legend (86K reputation)Legend (86K reputation)Legend (86K reputation)Legend (86K reputation)Legend (86K reputation)Legend (86K reputation)Legend (86K reputation)Legend (86K reputation)

Group: Moderators
Posts: 66K, Visits: 0
Let's hope it is in Melbourne.
Diegos Son
Diegos Son
Pro
Pro (4K reputation)Pro (4K reputation)Pro (4K reputation)Pro (4K reputation)Pro (4K reputation)Pro (4K reputation)Pro (4K reputation)Pro (4K reputation)Pro (4K reputation)Pro (4K reputation)Pro (4K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 3.9K, Visits: 0
Joffa wrote:
Let's hope it is in Melbourne.


x2. Would make up for the 'marquee' fixture we had this year (sorry Kiwi crew! :) and we still have fond memories of Australia vs Chile in Feb 1998 and Chile's appearance at the MCG various times for Sydney 2000.

A wonderful end of season 'marquee' fixture for late May/early June and after that, the Socceroos can go on proper leave.
The Doctor
The Doctor
Legend
Legend (10K reputation)Legend (10K reputation)Legend (10K reputation)Legend (10K reputation)Legend (10K reputation)Legend (10K reputation)Legend (10K reputation)Legend (10K reputation)Legend (10K reputation)Legend (10K reputation)Legend (10K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 10K, Visits: 0
ehhh... not a fixture to really excite to be honest, their decent, and have some very good players and play an exciting style of football but would have liked somebody abit more higher profile... Ivory Coast would have been pretty cool

when is that USA game suppose to be on that got teed up in South Africa
avy1990
avy1990
Legend
Legend (13K reputation)Legend (13K reputation)Legend (13K reputation)Legend (13K reputation)Legend (13K reputation)Legend (13K reputation)Legend (13K reputation)Legend (13K reputation)Legend (13K reputation)Legend (13K reputation)Legend (13K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 13K, Visits: 0
Play it right in between both cities ;)

Edited by avy1990: 21/1/2011 08:25:15 AM
notorganic
notorganic
Legend
Legend (21K reputation)Legend (21K reputation)Legend (21K reputation)Legend (21K reputation)Legend (21K reputation)Legend (21K reputation)Legend (21K reputation)Legend (21K reputation)Legend (21K reputation)Legend (21K reputation)Legend (21K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 21K, Visits: 0
Melbourne is supposedly guaranteed one major international socceroos game per year.

Last year they tried to pass that off as New Zealand.
Victory>Heart
Victory>Heart
Pro
Pro (3.8K reputation)Pro (3.8K reputation)Pro (3.8K reputation)Pro (3.8K reputation)Pro (3.8K reputation)Pro (3.8K reputation)Pro (3.8K reputation)Pro (3.8K reputation)Pro (3.8K reputation)Pro (3.8K reputation)Pro (3.8K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 3.5K, Visits: 0
notorganic wrote:
Melbourne is supposedly guaranteed one major international socceroos game per year.

Last year they tried to pass that off as New Zealand.


And even then we still drew more than double the crowd Sydney did against Paraguay
sydneycroatia58
sydneycroatia58
Legend
Legend (41K reputation)Legend (41K reputation)Legend (41K reputation)Legend (41K reputation)Legend (41K reputation)Legend (41K reputation)Legend (41K reputation)Legend (41K reputation)Legend (41K reputation)Legend (41K reputation)Legend (41K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 40K, Visits: 0
Victory>Heart wrote:
notorganic wrote:
Melbourne is supposedly guaranteed one major international socceroos game per year.

Last year they tried to pass that off as New Zealand.


And even then we still drew more than double the crowd Sydney did against Paraguay


Being a Socceroos farewell match and all probably helped. As well as the fact that even if the Paraguay match was a sell out the New Zealand attendance still would have been higher because of the SFS capacity.
davidsomethingelse
davidsomethingelse
Legend
Legend (12K reputation)Legend (12K reputation)Legend (12K reputation)Legend (12K reputation)Legend (12K reputation)Legend (12K reputation)Legend (12K reputation)Legend (12K reputation)Legend (12K reputation)Legend (12K reputation)Legend (12K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 12K, Visits: 0
notorganic wrote:
Melbourne is supposedly guaranteed one major international socceroos game per year.


If that's true I'd let Sydney have Chile and for Melbourne to get someone bigger.
notorganic
notorganic
Legend
Legend (21K reputation)Legend (21K reputation)Legend (21K reputation)Legend (21K reputation)Legend (21K reputation)Legend (21K reputation)Legend (21K reputation)Legend (21K reputation)Legend (21K reputation)Legend (21K reputation)Legend (21K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 21K, Visits: 0
davidtorres wrote:
notorganic wrote:
Melbourne is supposedly guaranteed one major international socceroos game per year.


If that's true I'd let Sydney have Chile and for Melbourne to get someone bigger.


I'd take Chile and not run the risk of copping New Zealand again.
Victory>Heart
Victory>Heart
Pro
Pro (3.8K reputation)Pro (3.8K reputation)Pro (3.8K reputation)Pro (3.8K reputation)Pro (3.8K reputation)Pro (3.8K reputation)Pro (3.8K reputation)Pro (3.8K reputation)Pro (3.8K reputation)Pro (3.8K reputation)Pro (3.8K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 3.5K, Visits: 0
sydneycroatia58 wrote:
Victory>Heart wrote:
notorganic wrote:
Melbourne is supposedly guaranteed one major international socceroos game per year.

Last year they tried to pass that off as New Zealand.


And even then we still drew more than double the crowd Sydney did against Paraguay


Being a Socceroos farewell match and all probably helped. As well as the fact that even if the Paraguay match was a sell out the New Zealand attendance still would have been higher because of the SFS capacity.


"even if" are the key words there.
They didnt fill it so your point is moot.
Diegos Son
Diegos Son
Pro
Pro (4K reputation)Pro (4K reputation)Pro (4K reputation)Pro (4K reputation)Pro (4K reputation)Pro (4K reputation)Pro (4K reputation)Pro (4K reputation)Pro (4K reputation)Pro (4K reputation)Pro (4K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 3.9K, Visits: 0
Victory>Heart wrote:
sydneycroatia58 wrote:
Victory>Heart wrote:
notorganic wrote:
Melbourne is supposedly guaranteed one major international socceroos game per year.

Last year they tried to pass that off as New Zealand.


And even then we still drew more than double the crowd Sydney did against Paraguay


Being a Socceroos farewell match and all probably helped. As well as the fact that even if the Paraguay match was a sell out the New Zealand attendance still would have been higher because of the SFS capacity.


"even if" are the key words there.
They didnt fill it so your point is moot.


That's becuase the Victoran Government under the now-ousted John Brumby signd a deal with the FFA to guarantee one game per year in Melbourne. The FFA were locked into that deal regardless.

As notors said, Melbourne was sold a lemon last year, as respectful as I can be to the NZ boys who read this.
aitkenmike
aitkenmike
Amateur
Amateur (564 reputation)Amateur (564 reputation)Amateur (564 reputation)Amateur (564 reputation)Amateur (564 reputation)Amateur (564 reputation)Amateur (564 reputation)Amateur (564 reputation)Amateur (564 reputation)Amateur (564 reputation)Amateur (564 reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 561, Visits: 0
Diego's Son wrote:
Victory>Heart wrote:
sydneycroatia58 wrote:
Victory>Heart wrote:
notorganic wrote:
Melbourne is supposedly guaranteed one major international socceroos game per year.

Last year they tried to pass that off as New Zealand.


And even then we still drew more than double the crowd Sydney did against Paraguay


Being a Socceroos farewell match and all probably helped. As well as the fact that even if the Paraguay match was a sell out the New Zealand attendance still would have been higher because of the SFS capacity.


"even if" are the key words there.
They didnt fill it so your point is moot.


That's becuase the Victoran Government under the now-ousted John Brumby signd a deal with the FFA to guarantee one game per year in Melbourne. The FFA were locked into that deal regardless.

As notors said, Melbourne was sold a lemon last year, as respectful as I can be to the NZ boys who read this.


I think you're right. I certainly wouldn't see the NZ game as a 'major international' in that context. I do think however they gave you the best game you guys could get under the circumstances at the time though. I don't think many countries would have wanted to come down to this part of the world in the lead up to an African world cup.
Villaboy
Villaboy
Pro
Pro (4.3K reputation)Pro (4.3K reputation)Pro (4.3K reputation)Pro (4.3K reputation)Pro (4.3K reputation)Pro (4.3K reputation)Pro (4.3K reputation)Pro (4.3K reputation)Pro (4.3K reputation)Pro (4.3K reputation)Pro (4.3K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 4.2K, Visits: 0
How big is the Chilean community in Melbourne?? Surely that is also a factor.
davidsomethingelse
davidsomethingelse
Legend
Legend (12K reputation)Legend (12K reputation)Legend (12K reputation)Legend (12K reputation)Legend (12K reputation)Legend (12K reputation)Legend (12K reputation)Legend (12K reputation)Legend (12K reputation)Legend (12K reputation)Legend (12K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 12K, Visits: 0
Villaboy wrote:
How big is the Chilean community in Melbourne?? Surely that is also a factor.


It's pretty big from what I know. I think there's roughly 6-7,000.
A game between Chile and Australia in Melbourne would attract roughly 35-40k imo.
Diegos Son
Diegos Son
Pro
Pro (4K reputation)Pro (4K reputation)Pro (4K reputation)Pro (4K reputation)Pro (4K reputation)Pro (4K reputation)Pro (4K reputation)Pro (4K reputation)Pro (4K reputation)Pro (4K reputation)Pro (4K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 3.9K, Visits: 0
davidtorres wrote:
Villaboy wrote:
How big is the Chilean community in Melbourne?? Surely that is also a factor.


It's pretty big from what I know. I think there's roughly 6-7,000.
A game between Chile and Australia in Melbourne would attract roughly 35-40k imo.


Go and check data from Aus vs Chile Feb 1998 and Chile's games in Melbourne during Sydney 2000 Olympics for a guide.
2ndBest
2ndBest
Fan
Fan (88 reputation)Fan (88 reputation)Fan (88 reputation)Fan (88 reputation)Fan (88 reputation)Fan (88 reputation)Fan (88 reputation)Fan (88 reputation)Fan (88 reputation)Fan (88 reputation)Fan (88 reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 87, Visits: 0
notorganic wrote:
davidtorres wrote:
notorganic wrote:
Melbourne is supposedly guaranteed one major international socceroos game per year.


If that's true I'd let Sydney have Chile and for Melbourne to get someone bigger.


I'd take Chile and not run the risk of copping New Zealand again.


Pfft. After been outplayed for good portions of the game, all you could do is bobsled us off the park.
New_Dawn_Kiwi_Fan
New_Dawn_Kiwi_Fan
Semi-Pro
Semi-Pro (1.2K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.2K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.2K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.2K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.2K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.2K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.2K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.2K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.2K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.2K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.2K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 1.2K, Visits: 0
Who are we playing at home then?

Edited by New_Dawn_Kiwi_Fan: 23/1/2011 02:38:15 PM
thewestisland
thewestisland
Pro
Pro (3.8K reputation)Pro (3.8K reputation)Pro (3.8K reputation)Pro (3.8K reputation)Pro (3.8K reputation)Pro (3.8K reputation)Pro (3.8K reputation)Pro (3.8K reputation)Pro (3.8K reputation)Pro (3.8K reputation)Pro (3.8K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 3.7K, Visits: 0
New_Dawn_Kiwi_Fan wrote:
Who are we playing at home then?


Tuvalu!
Diegos Son
Diegos Son
Pro
Pro (4K reputation)Pro (4K reputation)Pro (4K reputation)Pro (4K reputation)Pro (4K reputation)Pro (4K reputation)Pro (4K reputation)Pro (4K reputation)Pro (4K reputation)Pro (4K reputation)Pro (4K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 3.9K, Visits: 0
2ndBest wrote:
notorganic wrote:
davidtorres wrote:
notorganic wrote:
Melbourne is supposedly guaranteed one major international socceroos game per year.


If that's true I'd let Sydney have Chile and for Melbourne to get someone bigger.


I'd take Chile and not run the risk of copping New Zealand again.


Pfft. After been outplayed for good portions of the game, all you could do is bobsled us off the park.


Old news and thanks for calling me a c..t on YF the other day. You're a hospitable bloke.

As I’ve said elsewhere of late, on-field the Nix have been doing well and letting the off-field stuff go, whether you like it or not, there’s off field stuff there and it has a right to be discussed. But take nothing away from their current on-field form.
2ndBest
2ndBest
Fan
Fan (88 reputation)Fan (88 reputation)Fan (88 reputation)Fan (88 reputation)Fan (88 reputation)Fan (88 reputation)Fan (88 reputation)Fan (88 reputation)Fan (88 reputation)Fan (88 reputation)Fan (88 reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 87, Visits: 0
um, what exactly does that have to do with this thread?
Shatter
Shatter
Pro
Pro (4.3K reputation)Pro (4.3K reputation)Pro (4.3K reputation)Pro (4.3K reputation)Pro (4.3K reputation)Pro (4.3K reputation)Pro (4.3K reputation)Pro (4.3K reputation)Pro (4.3K reputation)Pro (4.3K reputation)Pro (4.3K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 4.3K, Visits: 0
2ndBest wrote:
um, what exactly does that have to do with this thread?


Sydney crowds (and Melbourne's superiority aka the inferiority complex all Melbournians suffer) and Wellington's existence are brought up at random throughout this forum.

The key is to find some kind of related factor.

For example, if there could be an article on Liverpool v Manchester United and someone will discover a player on the Man Utd bench once visited Sydney and Wellington on a holiday. Cue segue; "I bet if he had gone to a home game in each city he would've seen how shit Sydney's crowds are and that Wellington should not be in the A-League." Cue the 30 people on these forums who do daily "New Zealand/Wellington" and "Sydney" searches so that they can add their 2c.
davidsomethingelse
davidsomethingelse
Legend
Legend (12K reputation)Legend (12K reputation)Legend (12K reputation)Legend (12K reputation)Legend (12K reputation)Legend (12K reputation)Legend (12K reputation)Legend (12K reputation)Legend (12K reputation)Legend (12K reputation)Legend (12K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 12K, Visits: 0
APPARENTLY it's going to be at AAMI Park on June 4.
Victory>Heart
Victory>Heart
Pro
Pro (3.8K reputation)Pro (3.8K reputation)Pro (3.8K reputation)Pro (3.8K reputation)Pro (3.8K reputation)Pro (3.8K reputation)Pro (3.8K reputation)Pro (3.8K reputation)Pro (3.8K reputation)Pro (3.8K reputation)Pro (3.8K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 3.5K, Visits: 0
davidtorres wrote:
APPARENTLY it's going to be at AAMI Park on June 4.


[-o< . This will definitely sellout if true.
davidsomethingelse
davidsomethingelse
Legend
Legend (12K reputation)Legend (12K reputation)Legend (12K reputation)Legend (12K reputation)Legend (12K reputation)Legend (12K reputation)Legend (12K reputation)Legend (12K reputation)Legend (12K reputation)Legend (12K reputation)Legend (12K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 12K, Visits: 0
Would definitely be a sell-out. It might just be true as well, because Storm aren't playing in Melbourne that weekend.
raspberryticklebear
raspberryticklebear
Pro
Pro (3.1K reputation)Pro (3.1K reputation)Pro (3.1K reputation)Pro (3.1K reputation)Pro (3.1K reputation)Pro (3.1K reputation)Pro (3.1K reputation)Pro (3.1K reputation)Pro (3.1K reputation)Pro (3.1K reputation)Pro (3.1K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 3K, Visits: 0
avy1990 wrote:
Play it right in between both cities ;)

Edited by avy1990: 21/1/2011 08:25:15 AM

:lol: =d>

2ndBest wrote:
notorganic wrote:
davidtorres wrote:
notorganic wrote:
Melbourne is supposedly guaranteed one major international socceroos game per year.


If that's true I'd let Sydney have Chile and for Melbourne to get someone bigger.


I'd take Chile and not run the risk of copping New Zealand again.


Pfft. After been outplayed for good portions of the game, all you could do is bobsled us off the park.

That's even worse, being beaten by an unknown footballing nation;)

The point is, we would rather watch a worldwide well known football nation that will provide entertainment.
More of a crowd-pleasing game, e.g. in a club sense, MLS supporters waching Manchester United play against MLS teams in America.

Diego's Son wrote:
Old news and thanks for calling me a c..t on YF the other day. You're a hospitable bloke.

As I’ve said elsewhere of late, on-field the Nix have been doing well and letting the off-field stuff go, whether you like it or not, there’s off field stuff there and it has a right to be discussed. But take nothing away from their current on-field form.

Well what a fucking surprise you were called a cunt on a NZ footballing forum. You critisise NZ football an awful lot here, even troll, so I can only imagine the only reason you'd join a forum specially for what NZ football, is to perhaps, critisise even more, and troll?

Stop whinging about it here:roll:


Edited by raspberryticklebear: 27/1/2011 07:32:35 PM
Diegos Son
Diegos Son
Pro
Pro (4K reputation)Pro (4K reputation)Pro (4K reputation)Pro (4K reputation)Pro (4K reputation)Pro (4K reputation)Pro (4K reputation)Pro (4K reputation)Pro (4K reputation)Pro (4K reputation)Pro (4K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 3.9K, Visits: 0
The teenagers of today, the law protects them heaps these days...yet they are the ones that need the biggest kick up the arse.

Said by Simon Palomares, December 2010.
Victory>Heart
Victory>Heart
Pro
Pro (3.8K reputation)Pro (3.8K reputation)Pro (3.8K reputation)Pro (3.8K reputation)Pro (3.8K reputation)Pro (3.8K reputation)Pro (3.8K reputation)Pro (3.8K reputation)Pro (3.8K reputation)Pro (3.8K reputation)Pro (3.8K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 3.5K, Visits: 0
Diego's Son wrote:
The teenagers of today, the law protects them heaps these days...yet they are the ones that need the biggest kick up the arse.

Said by Simon Palomares, December 2010.


:lol:
WaMackie
WaMackie
Pro
Pro (3.1K reputation)Pro (3.1K reputation)Pro (3.1K reputation)Pro (3.1K reputation)Pro (3.1K reputation)Pro (3.1K reputation)Pro (3.1K reputation)Pro (3.1K reputation)Pro (3.1K reputation)Pro (3.1K reputation)Pro (3.1K reputation)

Group: Banned Members
Posts: 3K, Visits: 0
raspberryticklebear wrote:
Diego's Son wrote:
Old news and thanks for calling me a c..t on YF the other day. You're a hospitable bloke.

As I’ve said elsewhere of late, on-field the Nix have been doing well and letting the off-field stuff go, whether you like it or not, there’s off field stuff there and it has a right to be discussed. But take nothing away from their current on-field form.

Well what a fucking surprise you were called a cunt on a NZ footballing forum. You critisise NZ football an awful lot here, even troll, so I can only imagine the only reason you'd join a forum specially for what NZ football, is to perhaps, critisise even more, and troll?

Stop whinging about it here:roll:


Isn't this some 13 year old kid that thinks he knows everything? shut up kid, you weren't old enough to remember New Zealand trying to block Australia going to Asia.

Internet freaks.
Diegos Son
Diegos Son
Pro
Pro (4K reputation)Pro (4K reputation)Pro (4K reputation)Pro (4K reputation)Pro (4K reputation)Pro (4K reputation)Pro (4K reputation)Pro (4K reputation)Pro (4K reputation)Pro (4K reputation)Pro (4K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 3.9K, Visits: 0
2ndBest wrote:
um, what exactly does that have to do with this thread?


From http://www.yellowfever.co.nz/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=14694&PN=20

lol at this from the above page
2ndBest wrote:
If it posts like a c**t, acts like a c**t, looks like a c**t, it must be a c**t.


You are an ignorant knobhead.
GO


Select a Forum....























Inside Sport


Search