|
Axelv
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 2.2K,
Visits: 0
|
Sirocco wrote:Axelv wrote:
Foxtel make close to 50% of their revenue through advertising, by law they can't make any more than that.
Why did they make that law for? Because it's pay television, not commercial.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mister Football
|
|
Group: Banned Members
Posts: 3.8K,
Visits: 0
|
ozboy wrote:Mister Football wrote:ozboy wrote:danp638 wrote:Mister Football wrote:ozboy wrote: Ratings have shown it clearly didn't pay off. Mate - it took one round into the AFL season for Fox Footy to be the top rating STV channel in the land, how on Earth can you do better than that??!! One round!! The entire round is played on one channel, of course the channel will rate well, but that does not mean its more popular than the NRL, the fact is the NRL s spread over multiple channels and so their is no means of accurately comparing the two, now if we start looking at the ratings of the exclusive Fox games for both codes..... NRL is the top rating code on Fox. Mr Aussie Rules struggles with channel spatial awareness... Last Sunday Fox Footy had six shows out of the top 20 Fox shows, inlcuding the top two, both AFL games, and both shown on FTA in the states of one of the competing teams (getting very good FTA ratings for the respective states). The NRL game was third. The AFL ratings for round one were 65% on round one for last season. When AFL went head to head with NRL on Saturday night, NRL held the top two positions, by a decent margin over AFL Then on Monday NRL got 317,000 with no competition, which was 50,000 more than the AFL's best of 267,000 on Friday with no competition. The stats don't lie: NRL is a bigger sport to Fox than AFL Indeed the stats don't lie. For its opening round the AFL got combined ratings of 5.3 million, while the NRL for round five got 2.8 million, which is quite a difference. I was also just checking the ratings for last night. Fox Footy had two talk shows reaching 3rd and 4th: 85k and 74k respectively, while poor old NRL on Fox was way down in 14th with only 55k. And this is the incredible thing, it's one of the very few NRL talk shows on Fox, and as I've said previously, there are a good dozen AFL talk shows on Fox Footy, all getting between 50k and 120k consistently.
|
|
|
|
|
ozboy
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 6.5K,
Visits: 0
|
Mister Football wrote:ozboy wrote:Mister Football wrote:ozboy wrote:danp638 wrote:Mister Football wrote:ozboy wrote: Ratings have shown it clearly didn't pay off. Mate - it took one round into the AFL season for Fox Footy to be the top rating STV channel in the land, how on Earth can you do better than that??!! One round!! The entire round is played on one channel, of course the channel will rate well, but that does not mean its more popular than the NRL, the fact is the NRL s spread over multiple channels and so their is no means of accurately comparing the two, now if we start looking at the ratings of the exclusive Fox games for both codes..... NRL is the top rating code on Fox. Mr Aussie Rules struggles with channel spatial awareness... Last Sunday Fox Footy had six shows out of the top 20 Fox shows, inlcuding the top two, both AFL games, and both shown on FTA in the states of one of the competing teams (getting very good FTA ratings for the respective states). The NRL game was third. The AFL ratings for round one were 65% on round one for last season. When AFL went head to head with NRL on Saturday night, NRL held the top two positions, by a decent margin over AFL Then on Monday NRL got 317,000 with no competition, which was 50,000 more than the AFL's best of 267,000 on Friday with no competition. The stats don't lie: NRL is a bigger sport to Fox than AFL Indeed the stats don't lie. For its opening round the AFL got combined ratings of 5.3 million, while the NRL for round five got 2.8 million, which is quite a difference. I was also just checking the ratings for last night. Fox Footy had two talk shows reaching 3rd and 4th: 85k and 74k respectively, while poor old NRL on Fox was way down in 14th with only 55k. And this is the incredible thing, it's one of the very few NRL talk shows on Fox, and as I've said previously, there are a good dozen AFL talk shows on Fox Footy, all getting between 50k and 120k consistently. You have shown FTA ratings not Fox. On Fox, NRL is more popular than AFL Talk shows aren't the bread & butter - they are fillers. Fillers particularly for Fox having to pad out their new channel. The same would happen with a sole NRL channel
|
|
|
|
|
skeptic
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 3.6K,
Visits: 0
|
Gees, if you call shows that rate higher than an average live aleague telecast, 'fillers', what do you call the aleague telecast?
|
|
|
|
|
ozboy
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 6.5K,
Visits: 0
|
skeptic wrote:Gees, if you call shows that rate higher than an average live aleague telecast, 'fillers', what do you call the aleague telecast? If you call Football unpopular with Socceroos getting ratings over 350K, what does that say about the AFL? See, I can take things out of context as well.......
|
|
|
|
|
skeptic
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 3.6K,
Visits: 0
|
Then don't try to belittle regular weekly shows that rate quite high by calling them fillers. And how many years ago was the last time the socceroos rated 350k?
And, my word, you certainly can take things out of context. Like your attempt to mislead regarding your insinuation the aleague should get 1/4 - 1/3 of of 1.25 billion because of it's ratings soley on paytv and omitting the fact most of that figure is from sources not including paytv.
Edited by skeptic: 6/4/2012 08:44:12 AM
|
|
|
|
|
ozboy
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 6.5K,
Visits: 0
|
skeptic wrote:Then don't try to belittle regular weekly shows that rate quite high by calling them fillers. And how many years ago was the last time the socceroos rated 350k? At a time when subscription numbers were lower - possibly the equivalent of over 500K today The 2007 HAL GF between Melb v Adel was the highest rating in payTV history at the time......................only 215K, just for some 'context'
|
|
|
|
Mister Football
|
|
Group: Banned Members
Posts: 3.8K,
Visits: 0
|
ozboy wrote:Mister Football wrote:ozboy wrote:Mister Football wrote:ozboy wrote:danp638 wrote:Mister Football wrote:ozboy wrote: Ratings have shown it clearly didn't pay off. Mate - it took one round into the AFL season for Fox Footy to be the top rating STV channel in the land, how on Earth can you do better than that??!! One round!! The entire round is played on one channel, of course the channel will rate well, but that does not mean its more popular than the NRL, the fact is the NRL s spread over multiple channels and so their is no means of accurately comparing the two, now if we start looking at the ratings of the exclusive Fox games for both codes..... NRL is the top rating code on Fox. Mr Aussie Rules struggles with channel spatial awareness... Last Sunday Fox Footy had six shows out of the top 20 Fox shows, inlcuding the top two, both AFL games, and both shown on FTA in the states of one of the competing teams (getting very good FTA ratings for the respective states). The NRL game was third. The AFL ratings for round one were 65% on round one for last season. When AFL went head to head with NRL on Saturday night, NRL held the top two positions, by a decent margin over AFL Then on Monday NRL got 317,000 with no competition, which was 50,000 more than the AFL's best of 267,000 on Friday with no competition. The stats don't lie: NRL is a bigger sport to Fox than AFL Indeed the stats don't lie. For its opening round the AFL got combined ratings of 5.3 million, while the NRL for round five got 2.8 million, which is quite a difference. I was also just checking the ratings for last night. Fox Footy had two talk shows reaching 3rd and 4th: 85k and 74k respectively, while poor old NRL on Fox was way down in 14th with only 55k. And this is the incredible thing, it's one of the very few NRL talk shows on Fox, and as I've said previously, there are a good dozen AFL talk shows on Fox Footy, all getting between 50k and 120k consistently. You have shown FTA ratings not Fox. On Fox, NRL is more popular than AFL Talk shows aren't the bread & butter - they are fillers. Fillers particularly for Fox having to pad out their new channel. The same would happen with a sole NRL channel No - I'm adding 5 city metro FTA ratings and Fox ratings for games last round. AFL - 5.3 million NRL - 2.8 million it's quite a difference. This helps explain why the AFL got $1.25 billion.
|
|
|
|
|
stefcep
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 5.7K,
Visits: 0
|
Axelv wrote:stefcep wrote:Mister Football wrote:Mister Football wrote:On Monday night, with no game on, Fox Footy still got 3 shows into the top 20. ON Tuesday night, AFL 360 was the top rating show, the only other Fox sports show in the top 20 was another Fox Footy show. We'll see this all season - this is why Fox paid the big bucks to the AFL. Nope. They did it increase subscriptions, not ratings. The former increases revenue, the latter doesn't. Edited by stefcep: 5/4/2012 02:32:36 PM Foxtel make close to 50% of their revenue through advertising, by law they can't make any more than that. OK so there's an upper limit on increased ratings will add in revenue. Wouldn't that mean even more that Foxtel paid what they did for AFL to increase subscriptions, not ratings?
|
|
|
|
Mister Football
|
|
Group: Banned Members
Posts: 3.8K,
Visits: 0
|
stefcep wrote:Axelv wrote:stefcep wrote:Mister Football wrote:Mister Football wrote:On Monday night, with no game on, Fox Footy still got 3 shows into the top 20. ON Tuesday night, AFL 360 was the top rating show, the only other Fox sports show in the top 20 was another Fox Footy show. We'll see this all season - this is why Fox paid the big bucks to the AFL. Nope. They did it increase subscriptions, not ratings. The former increases revenue, the latter doesn't. Edited by stefcep: 5/4/2012 02:32:36 PM Foxtel make close to 50% of their revenue through advertising, by law they can't make any more than that. OK so there's an upper limit on increased ratings will add in revenue. Wouldn't that mean even more that Foxtel paid what they did for AFL to increase subscriptions, not ratings? Yes, but you can't discount earning revenue from ads either. Fox Footy is now the highest rating channel on Fox, so it will be generating the best ad revenue as well.
|
|
|
|
|
ozboy
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 6.5K,
Visits: 0
|
Mister Football wrote:stefcep wrote:Axelv wrote:stefcep wrote:Mister Football wrote:Mister Football wrote:On Monday night, with no game on, Fox Footy still got 3 shows into the top 20. ON Tuesday night, AFL 360 was the top rating show, the only other Fox sports show in the top 20 was another Fox Footy show. We'll see this all season - this is why Fox paid the big bucks to the AFL. Nope. They did it increase subscriptions, not ratings. The former increases revenue, the latter doesn't. Edited by stefcep: 5/4/2012 02:32:36 PM Foxtel make close to 50% of their revenue through advertising, by law they can't make any more than that. OK so there's an upper limit on increased ratings will add in revenue. Wouldn't that mean even more that Foxtel paid what they did for AFL to increase subscriptions, not ratings? Yes, but you can't discount earning revenue from ads either. Fox Footy is now the highest rating channel on Fox, so it will be generating the best ad revenue as well. But the games don't have advertising and the games are what people subscribe for
|
|
|
|
|
Olympian
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 39,
Visits: 0
|
BBL :cool:
|
|
|
|
|
ozboy
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 6.5K,
Visits: 0
|
Mister Football wrote:ozboy wrote:Mister Football wrote:ozboy wrote:Mister Football wrote:ozboy wrote:danp638 wrote:Mister Football wrote:ozboy wrote: Ratings have shown it clearly didn't pay off. Mate - it took one round into the AFL season for Fox Footy to be the top rating STV channel in the land, how on Earth can you do better than that??!! One round!! The entire round is played on one channel, of course the channel will rate well, but that does not mean its more popular than the NRL, the fact is the NRL s spread over multiple channels and so their is no means of accurately comparing the two, now if we start looking at the ratings of the exclusive Fox games for both codes..... NRL is the top rating code on Fox. Mr Aussie Rules struggles with channel spatial awareness... Last Sunday Fox Footy had six shows out of the top 20 Fox shows, inlcuding the top two, both AFL games, and both shown on FTA in the states of one of the competing teams (getting very good FTA ratings for the respective states). The NRL game was third. The AFL ratings for round one were 65% on round one for last season. When AFL went head to head with NRL on Saturday night, NRL held the top two positions, by a decent margin over AFL Then on Monday NRL got 317,000 with no competition, which was 50,000 more than the AFL's best of 267,000 on Friday with no competition. The stats don't lie: NRL is a bigger sport to Fox than AFL Indeed the stats don't lie. For its opening round the AFL got combined ratings of 5.3 million, while the NRL for round five got 2.8 million, which is quite a difference. I was also just checking the ratings for last night. Fox Footy had two talk shows reaching 3rd and 4th: 85k and 74k respectively, while poor old NRL on Fox was way down in 14th with only 55k. And this is the incredible thing, it's one of the very few NRL talk shows on Fox, and as I've said previously, there are a good dozen AFL talk shows on Fox Footy, all getting between 50k and 120k consistently. You have shown FTA ratings not Fox. On Fox, NRL is more popular than AFL Talk shows aren't the bread & butter - they are fillers. Fillers particularly for Fox having to pad out their new channel. The same would happen with a sole NRL channel No - I'm adding 5 city metro FTA ratings and Fox ratings for games last round. AFL - 5.3 million NRL - 2.8 million it's quite a difference. This helps explain why the AFL got $1.25 billion. AFL average ratings on Fox for last week - 217K NRL average ratings on Fox last week - 275K 217K x9 = 1953K 275K x8 (if all NRL games were on Fox) = 2200K NRL on Fox>>>>>>>>>AFL on Fox Will be interesting to see what ratings AFL get in round 4 for an apples v apples comparison with NRL's round 4 (especially considering AFL won't have the advantage of showpiece games always utilised in the first round of a season)
|
|
|
|
|
nickk
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 5.5K,
Visits: 0
|
ozboy wrote:Mister Football wrote:stefcep wrote:Axelv wrote:stefcep wrote:Mister Football wrote:Mister Football wrote:On Monday night, with no game on, Fox Footy still got 3 shows into the top 20. ON Tuesday night, AFL 360 was the top rating show, the only other Fox sports show in the top 20 was another Fox Footy show. We'll see this all season - this is why Fox paid the big bucks to the AFL. Nope. They did it increase subscriptions, not ratings. The former increases revenue, the latter doesn't. Edited by stefcep: 5/4/2012 02:32:36 PM Foxtel make close to 50% of their revenue through advertising, by law they can't make any more than that. OK so there's an upper limit on increased ratings will add in revenue. Wouldn't that mean even more that Foxtel paid what they did for AFL to increase subscriptions, not ratings? Yes, but you can't discount earning revenue from ads either. Fox Footy is now the highest rating channel on Fox, so it will be generating the best ad revenue as well. But the games don't have advertising and the games are what people subscribe for Advertising on FOxtel is nowhere near 50% of revenue maybe its around 10% . On free to air they really pack the ads in so per viewer the advertising revenue is much higher.
|
|
|
|
|
ozboy
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 6.5K,
Visits: 0
|
nickk wrote:ozboy wrote:Mister Football wrote:stefcep wrote:Axelv wrote:stefcep wrote:Mister Football wrote:Mister Football wrote:On Monday night, with no game on, Fox Footy still got 3 shows into the top 20. ON Tuesday night, AFL 360 was the top rating show, the only other Fox sports show in the top 20 was another Fox Footy show. We'll see this all season - this is why Fox paid the big bucks to the AFL. Nope. They did it increase subscriptions, not ratings. The former increases revenue, the latter doesn't. Edited by stefcep: 5/4/2012 02:32:36 PM Foxtel make close to 50% of their revenue through advertising, by law they can't make any more than that. OK so there's an upper limit on increased ratings will add in revenue. Wouldn't that mean even more that Foxtel paid what they did for AFL to increase subscriptions, not ratings? Yes, but you can't discount earning revenue from ads either. Fox Footy is now the highest rating channel on Fox, so it will be generating the best ad revenue as well. But the games don't have advertising and the games are what people subscribe for Advertising on FOxtel is nowhere near 50% of revenue maybe its around 10% . On free to air they really pack the ads in so per viewer the advertising revenue is much higher. My post was in response to Mr Ozzie Roolz - he raised advertising on Fox, I raised the absence of advertising during AFL games on Fox Advertising during NRL game getting 315K>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>advertising during On The Couch getting 80K
|
|
|
|
|
southmelb
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 5.8K,
Visits: 0
|
ozboy wrote:Mister Football wrote:ozboy wrote:Mister Football wrote:ozboy wrote:Mister Football wrote:ozboy wrote:danp638 wrote:Mister Football wrote:ozboy wrote: Ratings have shown it clearly didn't pay off. Mate - it took one round into the AFL season for Fox Footy to be the top rating STV channel in the land, how on Earth can you do better than that??!! One round!! The entire round is played on one channel, of course the channel will rate well, but that does not mean its more popular than the NRL, the fact is the NRL s spread over multiple channels and so their is no means of accurately comparing the two, now if we start looking at the ratings of the exclusive Fox games for both codes..... NRL is the top rating code on Fox. Mr Aussie Rules struggles with channel spatial awareness... Last Sunday Fox Footy had six shows out of the top 20 Fox shows, inlcuding the top two, both AFL games, and both shown on FTA in the states of one of the competing teams (getting very good FTA ratings for the respective states). The NRL game was third. The AFL ratings for round one were 65% on round one for last season. When AFL went head to head with NRL on Saturday night, NRL held the top two positions, by a decent margin over AFL Then on Monday NRL got 317,000 with no competition, which was 50,000 more than the AFL's best of 267,000 on Friday with no competition. The stats don't lie: NRL is a bigger sport to Fox than AFL Indeed the stats don't lie. For its opening round the AFL got combined ratings of 5.3 million, while the NRL for round five got 2.8 million, which is quite a difference. I was also just checking the ratings for last night. Fox Footy had two talk shows reaching 3rd and 4th: 85k and 74k respectively, while poor old NRL on Fox was way down in 14th with only 55k. And this is the incredible thing, it's one of the very few NRL talk shows on Fox, and as I've said previously, there are a good dozen AFL talk shows on Fox Footy, all getting between 50k and 120k consistently. You have shown FTA ratings not Fox. On Fox, NRL is more popular than AFL Talk shows aren't the bread & butter - they are fillers. Fillers particularly for Fox having to pad out their new channel. The same would happen with a sole NRL channel No - I'm adding 5 city metro FTA ratings and Fox ratings for games last round. AFL - 5.3 million NRL - 2.8 million it's quite a difference. This helps explain why the AFL got $1.25 billion. AFL average ratings on Fox for last week - 217K NRL average ratings on Fox last week - 275K 217K x9 = 1953K 275K x8 (if all NRL games were on Fox) = 2200K NRL on Fox>>>>>>>>>AFL on Fox Will be interesting to see what ratings AFL get in round 4 for an apples v apples comparison with NRL's round 4 (especially considering AFL won't have the advantage of showpiece games always utilised in the first round of a season) Based on that the afl is doing very well on tv when you add its fta viewing component...even more impressive when you take into account that its the most attended code by far.
|
|
|
|
Mister Football
|
|
Group: Banned Members
Posts: 3.8K,
Visits: 0
|
ozboy wrote:
AFL - 5.3 million
NRL - 2.8 million
it's quite a difference.
This helps explain why the AFL got $1.25 billion
AFL average ratings on Fox for last week - 217K
NRL average ratings on Fox last week - 275K
217K x9 = 1953K
275K x8 (if all NRL games were on Fox) = 2200K
217K x9 = 1953K times 3 hours equals a volume of nearly 6,000 viewers 275K x8 (if all NRL games were on Fox) = 2200K equals a volume of 4,400 viewers When the NRL gets less than the AFL for its TV rights - make sure you remember that equation. Edited by Mister Football: 6/4/2012 12:05:27 PM
|
|
|
|
|
ozboy
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 6.5K,
Visits: 0
|
Mister Football wrote:ozboy wrote:
AFL - 5.3 million
NRL - 2.8 million
it's quite a difference.
This helps explain why the AFL got $1.25 billion
AFL average ratings on Fox for last week - 217K
NRL average ratings on Fox last week - 275K
217K x9 = 1953K
275K x8 (if all NRL games were on Fox) = 2200K
217K x9 = 1953K times 3 hours equals a volume of nearly 6,000 viewers 275K x8 (if all NRL games were on Fox) = 2200K equals a volume of 4,400 viewers When the NRL gets less than the AFL for its TV rights - make sure you remember that equation. NRL: 275,000 x $60 subscription x 7 months = $115M (remember 4 nations - NRL is an international sport) AFL: 217,000 x $60 subscription x 6 months = $78M Additional in game advertising - NRL: $10M; AFL: $0 NRL: $125M x 5 years = $625M AFL: $78M x 5 years = $390M Remember those more SPECIFIC equations when NRL's deal trumps AFL's
|
|
|
|
|
Heart_fan
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 8K,
Visits: 0
|
Who really cares guys. seriously the wrong forum to be having a battle over whether the NRL or AFL will get more cash for their TV deal.
This is a Football forum, but the real football :lol:
The TV rights for the HAL is much more important. The addition of a West Syd team should be a huge value add for us, and could well be the catalyst for us to bring stability to the league. Getting the finacial footing of existing clubs now is imperitive. Any expansion can build on that momentum.
|
|
|
|
|
asanchez
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 1.2K,
Visits: 0
|
Heart_fan wrote:Who really cares guys. seriously the wrong forum to be having a battle over whether the NRL or AFL will get more cash for their TV deal.
This is a Football forum, but the real football :lol:
The TV rights for the HAL is much more important. The addition of a West Syd team should be a huge value add for us, and could well be the catalyst for us to bring stability to the league. Getting the finacial footing of existing clubs now is imperitive. Any expansion can build on that momentum.
Hear hear. I'm agreeing with a Heart supporter on this one. Let's worry about the upcoming A-league TV rights. Happy to see some calculations about possible A-league TV rights figures instead of AFL and NRL.
|
|
|
|
|
stefcep
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 5.7K,
Visits: 0
|
Mister Football wrote:stefcep wrote:Axelv wrote:stefcep wrote:Mister Football wrote:Mister Football wrote:On Monday night, with no game on, Fox Footy still got 3 shows into the top 20. ON Tuesday night, AFL 360 was the top rating show, the only other Fox sports show in the top 20 was another Fox Footy show. We'll see this all season - this is why Fox paid the big bucks to the AFL. Nope. They did it increase subscriptions, not ratings. The former increases revenue, the latter doesn't. Edited by stefcep: 5/4/2012 02:32:36 PM Foxtel make close to 50% of their revenue through advertising, by law they can't make any more than that. OK so there's an upper limit on increased ratings will add in revenue. Wouldn't that mean even more that Foxtel paid what they did for AFL to increase subscriptions, not ratings? Yes, but you can't discount earning revenue from ads either. Fox Footy is now the highest rating channel on Fox, so it will be generating the best ad revenue as well. Is that growing Foxtel's pie or only changing the portion sizes? If subscriptions don't increase significantly then neither can the maximum ad revenue as it is capped at 50% of subscriptions. AFL may bring more of the ad revenue, but then they're paying a motza just to shift the source of the revenue.
|
|
|
|
|
Gyfox
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 13K,
Visits: 0
|
What happens to Fox Footy for the summer? Can't see ratings being much for endless re runs and the latest rumour discussions.
Maybe they are banking on a live cross to the final of the European Championship in Australia Football between Sweden and Finland.
Edited by gyfox: 6/4/2012 07:56:51 PM
|
|
|
|
|
Sirocco
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 891,
Visits: 0
|
This weeks ratings. LIVE: FOOTBALL: A-LEAGUE PERTH V WELL FOX SPORTS 3 72,000 http://www.throng.com.au/ratings/free-air-tv-ratings-saturday-april-7th-2012LIVE: FOOTBALL: A-LEAGUE C COAST V BRIS FOX SPORTS 3 73,000 http://www.throng.com.au/ratings/free-air-tv-ratings-sunday-april-8th-2012Solid ratings and nearly identical, wonder if its the same people watching the games? Also Top ten for the week. 1 LIVE: NRL SHARKS V DRAGONS FOX SPORTS 2 Sat 19:30 373,000 2 LIVE: NRL RAIDERS V COWBOYS FOX SPORTS 2 Mon 19:00 322,000 3 LIVE: NRL TITANS V ROOSTERS FOX SPORTS 2 Sat 17:30 289,000 4 LIVE: AFL PORT ADELAIDE V ST KILDA FOX FOOTY Sun 16:34 260,000 5 LIVE: AFL BULLDOGS V WEST COAST FOX FOOTY Sun 13:00 229,000 6 LIVE: NRL TITANS V BULLDOGS FOX SPORTS 2 Sun 14:00 222,000 7 LIVE: AFL LIONS V CARLTON FOX FOOTY Thu 19:30 211,000 8 LIVE: AFL WEST COAST V MELBOURNE FOX FOOTY Sat 16:30 210,000 9 LIVE: AFL SUNDAY PRE GAME SHOW FOX FOOTY Sun 16:01 176,000 10 LIVE: AFL ESSENDON V PORT ADELAIDE FOX FOOTY Sat 13:40 146,000 Sharks v Dragons number is very impressive.
|
|
|
|
Mister Football
|
|
Group: Banned Members
Posts: 3.8K,
Visits: 0
|
Gyfox wrote:What happens to Fox Footy for the summer? Can't see ratings being much for endless re runs and the latest rumour discussions.
Maybe they are banking on a live cross to the final of the European Championship in Australia Football between Sweden and Finland.
Edited by gyfox: 6/4/2012 07:56:51 PM No, I don't think that would be necessary. In fact, replays of old games would get as much ratings as what some A-League games currently get. In years to come, there might be demand for replays of GCU vs the Jets, etc.
|
|
|
|
|
darkharlequin
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 863,
Visits: 0
|
Mister Football wrote:In fact, replays of old games would get as much ratings as what some A-League games currently get. Not sure if trolling, delusional or just plain stupid.
|
|
|
|
|
Heart_fan
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 8K,
Visits: 0
|
darkharlequin wrote:Mister Football wrote:In fact, replays of old games would get as much ratings as what some A-League games currently get. Not sure if trolling, delusional or just plain stupid. All of the above. Did you expect anything else? :lol: Solid ratings for matches that did not involve a Melbourne or Sydney team. Edited by heart_fan: 10/4/2012 06:18:12 PM
|
|
|
|
|
darkharlequin
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 863,
Visits: 0
|
Yeah, I was happy to see those numbers. So who are you going to support when Heart goes belly up? Some bitter on the forum said so so it must be true! ;)
|
|
|
|
|
ozboy
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 6.5K,
Visits: 0
|
Sirocco wrote:
1 LIVE: NRL SHARKS V DRAGONS FOX SPORTS 2 Sat 19:30 373,000
2 LIVE: NRL RAIDERS V COWBOYS FOX SPORTS 2 Mon 19:00 322,000
3 LIVE: NRL TITANS V ROOSTERS FOX SPORTS 2 Sat 17:30 289,000
4 LIVE: AFL PORT ADELAIDE V ST KILDA FOX FOOTY Sun 16:34 260,000
5 LIVE: AFL BULLDOGS V WEST COAST FOX FOOTY Sun 13:00 229,000
6 LIVE: NRL TITANS V BULLDOGS FOX SPORTS 2 Sun 14:00 222,000
7 LIVE: AFL LIONS V CARLTON FOX FOOTY Thu 19:30 211,000
8 LIVE: AFL WEST COAST V MELBOURNE FOX FOOTY Sat 16:30 210,000
9 LIVE: AFL SUNDAY PRE GAME SHOW FOX FOOTY Sun 16:01 176,000
10 LIVE: AFL ESSENDON V PORT ADELAIDE FOX FOOTY Sat 13:40 146,000
NRL game average - 302K AFL game average - 211K Either AFL is going to send Fox to the wall or they are making a very healthy profit on the NRL rights!!
|
|
|
|
|
Schultzy
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 2.1K,
Visits: 0
|
has certainly given the NRL a fantastic base point to begin their discussions
|
|
|
|
|
Heart_fan
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 8K,
Visits: 0
|
darkharlequin wrote:Yeah, I was happy to see those numbers. So who are you going to support when Heart goes belly up? Some bitter on the forum said so so it must be true! ;) Its all good, I will still sleep tonight as he gets all excited over doomsday scenarios. Apparently the FFA have been hiding stories away in a vault somewhere about MH. Must be a facinating place :lol:
|
|
|
|