rusty
|
|
Group: Banned Members
Posts: 6.1K,
Visits: 0
|
notorganic wrote:Once again, RMR called this election with the highest degree of accuracy over any other polling company. If you're going to try and denigrate my posts because of the pedigree of my former employers, I'm afraid you're going to have to try much harder than that.
The fact remains, the election result is not because of a major swing towards the LNP. There aren't many reasons for LNP supporters to be gloating.
The swinging voters (including myself) of Australia sent a very clear message - they're not fans of either major parties. The only worthwhile fact is the Libs are in power and will run the country for the next three years (at least), you don't need any other reason to gloat other than that one. It's not like Abbott and co they're sitting around their bowls of cornflakes crying because they didn't get the swingers vote, the important thing is they got the winning vote.
|
|
|
|
rusty
|
|
Group: Banned Members
Posts: 6.1K,
Visits: 0
|
batfink wrote:notorganic wrote:rusty wrote:notorganic wrote:thupercoach wrote:Loving the butthurt. Abbott has been character assassinated for three years and people saw through the bs enough to vote Liberal anyway. Except that they didn't, to a large degree. They voted PUP or informal. Primary LNP votes increased modestly at best. You have to applaud the Labor faithful for trying to convince us the Libs didn't win the election. Great stuff.=d> :lol: "Labor faithful" I made it pretty clear who I voted for. It wasn't the ALP in either house and hasn't been for 3 election cycles, state or federal. I'm sorry that you and Batfink are so blinded by your devotion to the party to understand the point that I'm making. i am not devoted the coalition....just vehemently opposed to KRUDD Me neither batfink I'd not hesitate to vote Labor if they weren't so good at fucking things up. Big on ideas little on execution.
|
|
|
rusty
|
|
Group: Banned Members
Posts: 6.1K,
Visits: 0
|
General Ashnak wrote:sydneycroatia58 wrote:Can you consider the boats stopped if they're never reported? How the previous Liberal government dealt with the issue. They're hiding them all in the mangroves.
|
|
|
rusty
|
|
Group: Banned Members
Posts: 6.1K,
Visits: 0
|
sydneycroatia58 wrote:General Ashnak wrote:sydneycroatia58 wrote:Can you consider the boats stopped if they're never reported? How the previous Liberal government dealt with the issue. Pretty much. Watch it be turned into a military operation and completely kept out of the public eye and voila, boats stopped. Yeah they did a good job of keeping siev X out of the public eye didn't they.
|
|
|
notorganic
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 21K,
Visits: 0
|
RedKat wrote:notorganic wrote:batfink wrote:rusty wrote:notorganic wrote::lol: "Labor faithful"
I made it pretty clear who I voted for. It wasn't the ALP in either house and hasn't been for 3 election cycles, state or federal.
I'm sorry that you and Batfink are so blinded by your devotion to the party to understand the point that I'm making. Well lets be honest Notor the point you are making is you are really upset Liberals WON the election. The point Thuper is making is despite the desperate attempts of Labor and the fairfax media to portray Abbott as a demon he still WON the election, [size=9] you are just trying to cherry pick certain bits of data to present the false and misleading case that this was not a DECISIVE LIBERAL VICTORY.[/size] It was - you just have to look at the number of seats they claimed compared to every other party - the facts DO NOT lie. You need to stop kidding yourself, and I have no idea who you voted for and I don't really care. all those years at Roy Morgan research taught him how to manipulate data to your own advantage...LOL and you are quite right, he is bitter and twisted ABBOTT romped it in......LOL Once again, RMR called this election with the highest degree of accuracy over any other polling company. If you're going to try and denigrate my posts because of the pedigree of my former employers, I'm afraid you're going to have to try much harder than that. The fact remains, the election result is not because of a major swing towards the LNP. There aren't many reasons for LNP supporters to be gloating. The swinging voters (including myself) of Australia sent a very clear message - they're not fans of either major parties. Not a fan of either party but Labor had one of its worst primaries in 100 years and Liberals have won approximately 30 more seats than Labor. That suggests a fucking obvious trend that voters are rejecting Labor (and Greens, dont forget the huge swing against them) and sending their votes to Liberals. You sound like Adam Bandt who, when asked why Greens had such a horrific election, could just um and uh and rattle off Greens policies and state how its evident that the voters have rejected the major parties. LNP's primary only increased 1.7%. To say that the swing against Labor went to the Libs is stupid, and you are stupid for saying it.
|
|
|
sydneycroatia58
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 40K,
Visits: 0
|
|
|
|
thupercoach
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 8.3K,
Visits: 0
|
Time to move on methinks. The country has got a new PM and this won't change for at least 3 years.
Let's hope Tony Abbott and his cabinet deliver for all Australia, surely we can all be united on that.
|
|
|
macktheknife
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 16K,
Visits: 0
|
Wasn't there as much a swing away from the Greens as there was Labor?
|
|
|
Joffa
|
|
Group: Moderators
Posts: 66K,
Visits: 0
|
Journalists on smuggling boat intercepted off Australia By AFP September 09, 2013 - Updated 1330 PKT From Web Edition SYDNEY: Two journalists were found on a people-smuggling boat intercepted off northern Australia, officials said Monday, with reports they had spent three days at sea and were badly sunburnt. The pair, one Dutch and one United States national, were on board a vessel carrying 57 passengers that was detected by the navy's HMAS Armidale off remote Christmas Island overnight, an immigration official told. "Two people who disembarked from a suspected irregular entry vessel at Christmas Island today have presented as journalists," an immigration department spokeswoman said. "These people had valid travel documents and held Australian visas. They have been cleared by immigration on arrival." Immigration could not say which, if any, organisation the men claimed to be from but they were later confirmed to be Afghanistan-based photographer Joel van Houdt and reporter Luke Mogelson. They are believed to be on assignment for the New York Times Magazine. Van Houdt's girlfriend, Amie Ferris-Rotman, said they had paid a people-smuggler in Indonesia for passage to Australia. "Very proud of @joelvanhoudt and Luke Mogelson for becoming the first journos to get on an asylum boat to Australia," Ferris-Rotman posted on Twitter. She said it had been a "long 72 hours" waiting for the pair to arrive in Australia, adding that van Houdt took a refugee boat to Spain in similar circumstances in 2008. They had been in touch since his arrival in Australia and Ferris-Rotman, a Knight journalism fellow at Stanford University in the United States, said he was fine and in good spirits. The Australian Broadcasting Corporation said the men had spent three days at sea and were badly sunburnt. http://www.thenews.com.pk/article-117436-Journalists-on-smuggling-boat-intercepted-off-Australia?
|
|
|
notorganic
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 21K,
Visits: 0
|
macktheknife wrote:Wasn't there as much a swing away from the Greens as there was Labor? Not quite as much, but then again The Greens had a smaller starting point. The sooner Milne leaves and Bandt takes over to drive the party forward the better. Also not happy with The Secular Party where we missed a lot of opportunity to increase our primary vote with the growing issues of marriage equality and SRI in schools bubbling just behind the surface of major election points. In part, it's a lack of money and boots on the ground, but we're also failing to play to our base of skeptics, atheists & freethinkers at a grassroots level whilst simultaneously aleniating ourselves from a significant chunk of society in compassionate, progressive & humanistic believers. I hope that over the next 3 years we will have sufficient time to reflect on our failings as a party and get back on track to doing the great innovative, rational & positive policy work that we know we are capable of.
|
|
|
afromanGT
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 77K,
Visits: 0
|
mcjules wrote:I don't think increasing population will help housing prices (will probably do the opposite). Your investment distribution argument may hold and I don't agree that asylum seekers are the only solution to our problems with our aging population putting strain on younger people.
It makes me sound like I'm anti-immigration but I'm not. Just think the rationale isn't spot on in your argument.
I'm not saying they're the only solution, but it kills two birds with one stone. Increasing population justifies an increase the amount of land being released to the public, then once the Baby Boomers make up a smaller percentage of the populace you're able to gradually flood the market more efficiently without destroying people's life savings. Quote:The swinging voters (including myself) of Australia sent a very clear message - they're not fans of either major parties. That's why the minor parties won so many seats... batfink wrote:pv4 wrote:afromanGT wrote:So, everyone ready for a recession? Newcastle has been in one under a Labour government for months now. the construction and housing industry has been in recession for 4 years Again, land availability. You can't build if you don't have anything to build on.
|
|
|
sydneycroatia58
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 40K,
Visits: 0
|
So the Labor Party actually picked up more votes than the Liberal party.
|
|
|
notorganic
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 21K,
Visits: 0
|
sydneycroatia58 wrote:So the Labor Party actually picked up more votes than the Liberal party. I don't think that's actually true,
|
|
|
paulbagzFC
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 44K,
Visits: 0
|
sydneycroatia58 wrote:So the Labor Party actually picked up more votes than the Liberal party. wut. -PB
|
|
|
sydneycroatia58
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 40K,
Visits: 0
|
notorganic wrote:sydneycroatia58 wrote:So the Labor Party actually picked up more votes than the Liberal party. I don't think that's actually true, Should've said, at this time. According to the ABC as of 9:14pm with 77.2% counted the Labor party has 3,616,324 primary votes, while the Liberal party has 3,395,035
|
|
|
sydneycroatia58
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 40K,
Visits: 0
|
Btw I'm not talking Coalition, just purely the Liberal party and the Labor party.
|
|
|
notorganic
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 21K,
Visits: 0
|
The way the Libs break up their state branches is a bit different from Labor. Once you factor that their primary vote is ahead.
|
|
|
thupercoach
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 8.3K,
Visits: 0
|
notorganic wrote:macktheknife wrote:Wasn't there as much a swing away from the Greens as there was Labor? Not quite as much, but then again The Greens had a smaller starting point. The sooner Milne leaves and Bandt takes over to drive the party forward the better. Also not happy with The Secular Party where we missed a lot of opportunity to increase our primary vote with the growing issues of marriage equality and SRI in schools bubbling just behind the surface of major election points. In part, it's a lack of money and boots on the ground, but we're also failing to play to our base of skeptics, atheists & freethinkers at a grassroots level whilst simultaneously aleniating ourselves from a significant chunk of society in compassionate, progressive & humanistic believers. I hope that over the next 3 years we will have sufficient time to reflect on our failings as a party and get back on track to doing the great innovative, rational & positive policy work that we know we are capable of. Got a link? Happy to check it out.
|
|
|
notorganic
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 21K,
Visits: 0
|
Secular.org.au
|
|
|
afromanGT
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 77K,
Visits: 0
|
sydneycroatia58 wrote:Btw I'm not talking Coalition, just purely the Liberal party and the Labor party. The two parties won the same number of seats. But then there's all the little factioned portions of the Liberal Party to account for.
|
|
|
batfink
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 9.9K,
Visits: 0
|
afromanGT wrote:mcjules wrote:I don't think increasing population will help housing prices (will probably do the opposite). Your investment distribution argument may hold and I don't agree that asylum seekers are the only solution to our problems with our aging population putting strain on younger people.
It makes me sound like I'm anti-immigration but I'm not. Just think the rationale isn't spot on in your argument.
I'm not saying they're the only solution, but it kills two birds with one stone. Increasing population justifies an increase the amount of land being released to the public, then once the Baby Boomers make up a smaller percentage of the populace you're able to gradually flood the market more efficiently without destroying people's life savings. Quote:The swinging voters (including myself) of Australia sent a very clear message - they're not fans of either major parties. That's why the minor parties won so many seats... batfink wrote:pv4 wrote:afromanGT wrote:So, everyone ready for a recession? Newcastle has been in one under a Labour government for months now. the construction and housing industry has been in recession for 4 years Again, land availability. You can't build if you don't have anything to build on. there is shit loads of land......especially in NSW, all ready to build....but cost's for developers and builders has escalated out of control....add to that the banks dropping liquidity % on loans, the government introduced home owners insurance to protect the banks, and spiralling cost of builing materials due to the carbon tax and it's little wonder why these industries are rooted and the cost of land and houses are so high......
|
|
|
batfink
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 9.9K,
Visits: 0
|
notorganic wrote:batfink wrote:rusty wrote:notorganic wrote::lol: "Labor faithful"
I made it pretty clear who I voted for. It wasn't the ALP in either house and hasn't been for 3 election cycles, state or federal.
I'm sorry that you and Batfink are so blinded by your devotion to the party to understand the point that I'm making. Well lets be honest Notor the point you are making is you are really upset Liberals WON the election. The point Thuper is making is despite the desperate attempts of Labor and the fairfax media to portray Abbott as a demon he still WON the election, [size=9] you are just trying to cherry pick certain bits of data to present the false and misleading case that this was not a DECISIVE LIBERAL VICTORY.[/size] It was - you just have to look at the number of seats they claimed compared to every other party - the facts DO NOT lie. You need to stop kidding yourself, and I have no idea who you voted for and I don't really care. all those years at Roy Morgan research taught him how to manipulate data to your own advantage...LOL and you are quite right, he is bitter and twisted ABBOTT romped it in......LOL Once again, RMR called this election with the highest degree of accuracy over any other polling company. If you're going to try and denigrate my posts because of the pedigree of my former employers, I'm afraid you're going to have to try much harder than that. The fact remains, the election result is not because of a major swing towards the LNP. There aren't many reasons for LNP supporters to be gloating. The swinging voters (including myself) of Australia sent a very clear message - they're not fans of either major parties. LOL...wasn't saying RMR manipulated the data, was suggesting that you were in that industry and well versed in how that data could be manipulated..... there is no benefit for RMR to get the election results wrong...;)
|
|
|
batfink
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 9.9K,
Visits: 0
|
batfink wrote:notorganic wrote:batfink wrote:notorganic wrote:It's not surprising that the biggest swing away from Labor was not a swing towards the LNP.
Abbott is PM by default. This result is not a vindication of him and his party. Hmmm..strange take on things??? on the AEC web page it's stats are Labor HAD 72 seat and now have 57 so a loss of 15 seats, and the coalition HAD 73 seat and now have 88 an increase of 15 seats??? ??????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????? [size=7] I'm sorry that the concept of more than 2 parties being available for Australians to vote for is too abstract for you to grasp. [/size] Please Matt try if you can to keep it on topic and civil...... my reply was commenting on the FACT that the ALP lost 15 seats and the coalition gained 15 seats....? so you are telling me that Labor voters went to the polls and registered informal votes rather than putting themselves through hell and voting for the coalition??????? and then you accuse me of not being able to grasp the concept of more than two political parties?!??!?!? ](*,) ](*,) sharp as a bowling ball....
|
|
|
paulbagzFC
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 44K,
Visits: 0
|
Did batfink just argue with himself?... -PB
|
|
|
batfink
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 9.9K,
Visits: 0
|
paulbagzFC wrote:Did batfink just argue with himself?...
-PB works for me....;) ;)
|
|
|
notorganic
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 21K,
Visits: 0
|
paulbagzFC wrote:Did batfink just argue with himself?...
-PB Most sense he's made in years.
|
|
|
sydneycroatia58
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 40K,
Visits: 0
|
:lol: Had an argument with someone yesterday who was trying to claim that informal votes count as votes for Labor. After a few mins I started really regretting getting involved in the argument :lol:
|
|
|
thupercoach
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 8.3K,
Visits: 0
|
sydneycroatia58 wrote::lol: Had an argument with someone yesterday who was trying to claim that informal votes count as votes for Labor. After a few mins I started really regretting getting involved in the argument :lol: One is a donkey vote, the other is a vote for a donkey.
|
|
|
sydneycroatia58
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 40K,
Visits: 0
|
I still laugh at the fact News Ltd predicted that Chris Bowen would lose McMahon :lol:
|
|
|
thupercoach
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 8.3K,
Visits: 0
|
sydneycroatia58 wrote:I still laugh at the fact News Ltd predicted that Chris Bowen would lose McMahon :lol: It came pretty close. His smear campaign against Ray King worked a treat. Bowen is scum the way he kept up the mudslinging. It worked for him though.
|
|
|