batfink
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 9.9K,
Visits: 0
|
Joffa wrote:batfink wrote:Joffa wrote:Quote:Abbott has adopted a 'less is more' approach to calm the nation Less media releases, less access to information on asylum seekers, less women in Cabinet, less of a budgetary a crisis than we were repeatedly told....oh and Parliament is yet to sit...and it has only been a month since the election....I thought we were in crisis? Oh and the boats are still coming.... would expect more from you Joffa....... the difference is the media are pissed off that they no longer have the government knee jerking.... True enough about knee jerking, I for one hope the Libs get it right, time will tell...for me I want to see substance and not hype. If Abbott can become a statesman, well that would be fantastic and to our nations benefit, but to call him that after one month is frankly disingenuous . yes...agreed....but at least give them 6-12 month to see of what they try to come through and show the results.......frankly the media have a lot to answer for....premature ejectulators of hype and speculation fapping off everywhere
|
|
|
|
batfink
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 9.9K,
Visits: 0
|
afromanGT wrote:mcjules wrote:batfink wrote:Joffa wrote:Quote:Abbott has adopted a 'less is more' approach to calm the nation Less media releases, less access to information on asylum seekers, less women in Cabinet, less of a budgetary a crisis than we were repeatedly told....oh and Parliament is yet to sit...and it has only been a month since the election....I thought we were in crisis? Oh and the boats are still coming.... would expect more from you Joffa....... the difference is the media are pissed off that they no longer have the government knee jerking.... Once the opposition have a leader, they'll be in the media constantly just like negative tony was when he was in opposition and he'll be smoked out of his hiding hole. But as usual they're too busy bickering and trying to make each other look bad in an internal power struggle instead of getting their shit together and making the LNP look bad. wouldn't it be nice to see an opposition party willing to work together and get fair dinkum results for the people of Australia, for the people....sick of any and all governments fighting and bickering....we can't they get some form og co-operation happening??????
|
|
|
afromanGT
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 77K,
Visits: 0
|
Given the expenses controversy that's happening and the boat people issue continuing, this is the ideal time for Labor to be rocking the boat. Instead the only 'opposition' voice we're hearing is that tit Independent Nick Xenophon.
|
|
|
Decazz
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 871,
Visits: 0
|
Ahhh the ALP is hardly bickering....this is a process that occurs within labo(u)r parties in many western countries...theres no bad blood between the two sides. Abbott did well in Indonesia...he will obviously have to drop a few of his Asylum Seeker policies having emerged from the fantasy land that is opposition and into Government!
|
|
|
Joffa
|
|
Group: Moderators
Posts: 66K,
Visits: 0
|
batfink wrote:
wouldn't it be nice to see an opposition party willing to work together and get fair dinkum results for the people of Australia, for the people....sick of any and all governments fighting and bickering....we can't they get some form og co-operation happening??????
Yes Abbott really led the way in opposition with how he worked with the Govenment of the day.
|
|
|
Decazz
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 871,
Visits: 0
|
Joffa wrote:batfink wrote:
wouldn't it be nice to see an opposition party willing to work together and get fair dinkum results for the people of Australia, for the people....sick of any and all governments fighting and bickering....we can't they get some form og co-operation happening??????
Yes Abbott really led the way in opposition with how he worked with the Govenment of the day. Yeh look this thread is full of partisans but Batfink really takes the cake. Edited by Decazz: 6/10/2013 05:16:44 PM
|
|
|
Decazz
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 871,
Visits: 0
|
its important to remember that a vast majority of legislation gets bipartisan support...its the small amount of controversial legislation that gets all the attention
|
|
|
afromanGT
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 77K,
Visits: 0
|
Decazz wrote:its important to remember that a vast majority of legislation gets bipartisan support...its the small amount of controversial legislation that gets all the attention Most legislation passes without too much trouble. But most people think everything is a Mexican stand-off like we're seeing in the United States for every single bill on the table. Tony Abbott's attitude makes for a good opposition leader but nothing more.
|
|
|
notorganic
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 21K,
Visits: 0
|
|
|
|
batfink
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 9.9K,
Visits: 0
|
Joffa wrote:batfink wrote:
wouldn't it be nice to see an opposition party willing to work together and get fair dinkum results for the people of Australia, for the people....sick of any and all governments fighting and bickering....we can't they get some form og co-operation happening??????
Yes Abbott really led the way in opposition with how he worked with the Govenment of the day. obviously blue text required there Joffa....and i agree.....100% i know i am dreaming , but it would be nice if the politicians put the country first and self last......:-"
|
|
|
batfink
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 9.9K,
Visits: 0
|
i hear Matt's looking at a job in the media....slip right in there ;) ;) ;)
|
|
|
batfink
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 9.9K,
Visits: 0
|
Decazz wrote:Joffa wrote:batfink wrote:
wouldn't it be nice to see an opposition party willing to work together and get fair dinkum results for the people of Australia, for the people....sick of any and all governments fighting and bickering....we can't they get some form og co-operation happening??????
Yes Abbott really led the way in opposition with how he worked with the Govenment of the day. Yeh look this thread is full of partisans but Batfink really takes the cake. Edited by Decazz: 6/10/2013 05:16:44 PM how so??
|
|
|
Joffa
|
|
Group: Moderators
Posts: 66K,
Visits: 0
|
batfink wrote:Joffa wrote:batfink wrote:
wouldn't it be nice to see an opposition party willing to work together and get fair dinkum results for the people of Australia, for the people....sick of any and all governments fighting and bickering....we can't they get some form og co-operation happening??????
Yes Abbott really led the way in opposition with how he worked with the Govenment of the day. obviously blue text required there Joffa....and i agree.....100% i know i am dreaming , but it would be nice if the politicians put the country first and self last......:-" +1
|
|
|
Joffa
|
|
Group: Moderators
Posts: 66K,
Visits: 0
|
Tony Abbott paid back money claimed for Peter Slipper's wedding Prime minister has repaid more than $1,700 in travel costs claimed to attend weddings of two party colleagues Katharine Murphy , deputy political editor theguardian.com, Monday 7 October 2013 17.41 AEST The prime minister has repaid more than $1,700 in travel entitlements after controversy erupted over MPs using taxpayer-funded benefits to attend private functions, such as weddings. Tony Abbott acknowledged in Bali on Monday that he had repaid expenses relating to the wedding of his friend and former Liberal frontbencher Sophie Mirabella in 2006. He justified claiming the $1094.64 travel entitlement on the basis he was then leader of the House of Representatives, and that position required “certain representational roles”. After the Bali press conference, Abbott’s office confirmed that the prime minister had also paid back $609.10 worth of expenses he claimed to attend the 2006 nuptials of Peter Slipper, the former Liberal turned independent. Slipper, a former House of Representatives Speaker recruited by Labor in the 43rd parliament, is facing court proceedings over his use of travel entitlements. The Coalition was publicly critical of Slipper’s alleged activities after his defection to the crossbench. Abbott on Monday said he believed the claims he made in 2006 were within the rules of the entitlements scheme, but advice from the Department of Finance was “unclear” – so he reimbursed the taxpayer. He said he had been prompted to check the record after reports emerged about Liberal frontbenchers attending the wedding of a Sydney radio host, and subsequently claiming travel expenses. The prime minister urged his parliamentary colleagues to remain within the rules of the entitlements scheme. If there were mistakes or grey areas, Abbott said, then “clear it up as soon as possible”. National Barnaby Joyce, the Liberal deputy leader, Julie Bishop, and backbencher Teresa Gambaro also claimed taxpayer-funded travel entitlements after mining billionaire Gina Rinehart flew them to a lavish Indian wedding in 2011, according to Fairfax reports. Joyce reasoned during a radio interview on Monday that he was within the rules concerning overseas study tours for MPs, and Rinehart had actually saved the taxpayer money. “If someone else wants to pay half a trip, pay for it privately, which is basically what Gina Rinehart did, then it’s actually made it cheaper for the taxpayer,” Joyce said. The Greens are pledging to use the resumption of parliament to introduce a bill for a national integrity commissioner and independent parliamentary adviser to clear up ambiguities around travel entitlements. “The next wedding charged to the taxpayer should be an iron-clad marriage between elected public office and accountability with a national integrity commissioner,” the Greens leader, Christine Milne, said in a statement on Monday. “The Greens have had legislation before the last parliament to clean up MPs’ entitlements with a national integrity commissioner but Labor and the Coalition refused to act. This scandal has reached the highest political office in the country and must end now,” she said. “The Greens will move our integrity legislation again as soon as parliament returns.” http://www.theguardian.com/world/2013/oct/07/tony-abbott-paid-back-money-claimed-for-peter-slippers-wedding
|
|
|
macktheknife
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 16K,
Visits: 0
|
Is that rorts picture up to 4 now?
|
|
|
chillbilly
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 6.2K,
Visits: 0
|
Quote:Industry's coal seam gas campaign is a conThe gas industry is working a scam on the people of NSW, in collusion with other business lobby groups and federal and state politicians. It's trying to frighten us into agreeing to remove restrictions on the exploitation of coal seam gas deposits. Failing that, the various parties want to be able to lay the blame for an inevitable jump in the price of natural gas on the greenies and farmers. According to the gas lobby, the manufacturing lobby, the Business Council, federal Industry Minister Ian Macfarlane and former Labor minerals and energy minister Martin Ferguson, we have a looming gas supply crisis in NSW and must unlock our local coal seam gas resources if we're to avoid shortages and the price hikes they bring. NSW Minister for Resources and Energy Chris Hartcher, at whom most of lobbying is aimed - his government boasts of ''the toughest coal seam gas controls in Australia'' - must fully understand the deception, but seems reluctant to expose the dishonesty of his Coalition and business mates. The problem, we're told, is NSW produces only about 2 per cent of the natural gas its households and industrial users consume. And when facilities for liquefying and exporting gas start operating within a year or two, producers in Queensland and Victoria will switch to exporting their gas to gain the higher foreign prices. So NSW is facing a massive shortage of gas, which will cause a big jump in gas prices and threaten the jobs of thousands of people working in gas-dependent industries. The obvious answer, we're told, is for NSW to fill this supply gap and avert the price hike by urgently developing its own supply of coal seam gas. There's just one problem with this neat story: it reveals - or exploits - an ignorance of how markets work. The lobbyists' faulty logic is ably exposed by the Australia Institute's Matt Grudnoff in his paper, Cooking up a price rise. For many years, the prices paid for natural gas by consumers on Australia's eastern seaboard have been a lot lower than prices paid in other countries. The absence of plants to liquefy the gas so it could be exported meant our market was cut off from the world market. We had no liquefaction plants because we didn't have enough gas to make them profitable. What's changed is the advent of fracking, which has enabled us to begin exploiting our extensive deposits of coal seam gas. The development of ''unconventional'' gas in Queensland has progressed to the point where it's become economic for three liquefaction plants to be set up near Gladstone. When those plants start operating in a year or two, the barrier that separated our eastern seaboard gas market from the world market will disappear and the era of low gas prices will end. Grudnoff estimates the wholesale price of gas will double or treble from between $3 and $4 a gigajoule to the world ''netback'' price of $9 a gigajoule. ''This is because Australian gas producers will have the option to sell to the Japanese, who are willing to pay $15 a gigajoule,'' he says. The difference between $15 and the netback price - also known as the export parity price - is the cost of liquefying the gas and transporting it overseas. If you're as ancient as I am, this should remind you we've already been through a similar process of the low local price rising to the high world price when the Fraser government introduced export-parity pricing for oil in the late 1970s. The percentage rise in retail gas prices paid by households will be a lot smaller than the rise in the wholesale price. Estimates by Hugh Saddler, of the energy consultants Pitt & Sherry, suggest Sydney retail prices will rise by 11 per cent to 18 per cent - roughly twice the rise caused by the introduction of the carbon tax. The point is, wholesale and retail prices will rise to the new export parity price throughout the eastern seaboard. In Queensland where the frackers have had an easy ride, and in Victoria where the present moratorium on fracking seems likely to give way to an unrestricted regime, just as much as in NSW where the frackers are given a hard time. Because of pipelines between the states, how much gas a state produces has nothing to do with the prices its households and businesses pay. According to the gas lobby's logic, the coming ability of producers to get much higher prices by exporting their gas should produce shortages of gas for local users in Queensland and Victoria, not just NSW. In truth, there will be no shortages of gas in any state, just a requirement to pay the higher, netback price. There's no reason producers would prefer to sell to foreigners if locals are offering to pay the equivalent price. With the advent of fracking and access to higher prices, it's not surprising gas producers are desperate to extract as much coal seam gas as possible as soon as possible. But their argument that increased production in NSW could hold down NSW gas prices is economic nonsense. Any new gas producers in NSW won't be willing to sell to locals for anything less than the equivalent price they could get by selling to foreigners. That's the scam. Read more: http://www.smh.com.au/comment/industrys-coal-seam-gas-campaign-is-a-con-20131008-2v63m.html#ixzz2hBo397vt
|
|
|
afromanGT
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 77K,
Visits: 0
|
That's still more work for employees and more money back into the community. Who writes this shit?
|
|
|
Joffa
|
|
Group: Moderators
Posts: 66K,
Visits: 0
|
Bill Shorten predicted to win Labor caucus leadership ballot, insiders say Shorten supported by most of the party's right and some left faction MPs in Thursday's contest against Anthony Albanese Katharine Murphy , deputy political editor theguardian.com, Wednesday 9 October 2013 17.50 AEST Labor’s rival candidates for the leadership, Anthony Albanese and Bill Shorten, will join forces in a fundraiser in Sydney on Wednesday night ahead of the caucus ballot in Canberra on Thursday. The progressive business fundraiser is being held in part to offset the costs associated with the leadership ballot. This is the first time federal Labor has included rank-and-file members in the selection of the party’s federal leader, and the candidates have run primary-style public campaigns over the weeks since the September election. Most Labor insiders expect Shorten, the Victorian rightwinger, to emerge as the winner of Thursday’s caucus ballot. Shorten has support among the majority of rightwing MPs, and some supporters believe he will also secure a handful of votes from the party’s left. One Victorian leftwinger, Maria Vamvakinou, has endorsed Shorten publicly, and other Victorian leftwingers are still deliberating about which candidate they will support. Since the federal election, the party’s right faction holds a slightly increased majority in the Labor caucus. The new process for selecting the leader will see caucus MPs vote on Thursday. The ballot of grassroots members will remain open until 5pm on Friday. The two ballots are then combined and weighted, and the winner will be unveiled on Sunday. The majority of the party’s left will support Albanese, and he is thought by some colleagues to have stronger support than Shorten with the party’s grassroots membership, although other party insiders point to a concentrated effort with party members by Shorten and right-aligned trade unions throughout the ballot. Some ALP members believe the member’s ballot may be closer than conventional wisdom suggests. Shorten had a quiet day on Wednesday. Albanese did a radio interview in which he declared himself the best candidate for the job. Albanese said he was the candidate most committed to party reform, having campaigned for democratisation since the early 1990s. “I do have I think a record of action on those measures,” he said. http://www.theguardian.com/world/2013/oct/09/shorten-albanese-caucus-vote
|
|
|
Joffa
|
|
Group: Moderators
Posts: 66K,
Visits: 0
|
Ford could get federal assistance after it stops making cars in Australia: minister Ian Macfarlane says government would back a research and design centre, though he has 'greater ambitions for Ford' Katharine Murphy deputy political editor theguardian.com, Wednesday 9 October 2013 16.18 AEST The industry minister, Ian Macfarlane, says Ford could continue to receive government assistance after 2016 even if it does not manufacture cars in Australia. In the leadup to talks with Ford and Toyota in Victoria on Wednesday, Macfarlane said he wanted to explore options for keeping Ford’s production line open for as long as possible. Ford has said it will cease production in Australia in 2016. Macfarlane said if Ford operated a research and design centre in Australia post-2016 then the company would be eligible for government assistance, but he signalled he was pursuing a more ambitious outcome. “I must admit I have greater ambitions for Ford than just a design and R&D centre,” Macfarlane told the ABC. “I want to keep Ford's operation here as long as I can. I want to keep Ford operating in terms of production and also research and design for as long as I can.” The Coalition’s policy pre-election was to cut $500m from federal automotive assistance. After his tour of the carmakers on Wednesday, Macfarlane suggested to journalists this was the past. “I’m only looking forward. In terms of what [former shadow industry minister] Sophie Mirabella did, that’s the past. We are concentrating on the future.” He suggested one option to shore up the carmakers in the short term was to take funds from within the existing Automotive Transformation Scheme. The ATS scheme runs from 1 January 2011 to 31 December 2020 and includes capped assistance of $1.5bn from 2011 to 2015; capped assistance of $1bn from 2016 to 2020; and uncapped assistance of approximately $847m. “I have to use money that’s already with the ATS … then I will ask cabinet for permission to do that,” Macfarlane told reporters in Melbourne. The new government has asked the Productivity Commission to provide some interim policy recommendations about the car industry before Christmas. The industry minister was accompanied on Wednesday by the Labor MP Tim Watts – and Macfarlane emphasised a bipartisan approach to dealing with the challenges faced by the carmakers. Mcfarlane said he would not comment on what the carmakers were asking for in terms of dollars, and issued an explicit warning to car industry figures not to leak details of private discussions. He emphasised that he was trying to find a solution, but could easily devote attention to other pressing issues in his portfolio. “If these plants close, the repercussions will be felt across eastern Australia,” Macfarlane said. “I want to see Australia at the forefront of the car industry.” “I’m trying not to let [the car industry] down. I’m doing everything I can. But in the end it will be a decision of the government.” http://www.theguardian.com/business/2013/oct/09/ford-could-get-federal-assistance-after-it-stops-making-cars-in-australia-minister
|
|
|
Joffa
|
|
Group: Moderators
Posts: 66K,
Visits: 0
|
Joe Hockey's L-plates are there for all to see Date October 9, 2013 First the new Prime Minister gaffes big time over a free trade agreement with China with his “whatever we can get” kowtow. Now the new Treasurer is promoting old Australian growth figures from the International Monetary Fund as fresh bad news for the economy. The L plates are being worn large this spring. Overnight the IMF got around to adopting the existing Reserve Bank and Treasury forecasts for Australian economic growth, which is what it routinely does. In cutting its forecast for Australia's 2013 GDP to 2.5 per cent, the IMF was catching up with what the RBA was saying five months ago in its May statement on monetary policy. Treasury took a little longer to revise its more optimistic budget night forecasts, but by the August monetary policy statement and Treasury economic statement, the numbers were all aligned and pretty much what the IMF produced two months later. Treasurer Joe Hockey didn't treat it that way, issuing a statement to tell us the IMF had downgraded its expected growth rates for the Australian economy by 0.5 per cent. More bemusingly, the Treasurer said: "Worryingly, the IMF forecasts Australia's unemployment rate to rise from 5.6 per cent in 2013 to 6.0 per cent in 2014.” It seems poor Joe has been in negative opposition mode for so long, he doesn't recognise possible good news when he sees it. That IMF unemployment forecast is an improvement on what the RBA and Treasury have been saying. The budget back in May guessed unemployment would be 6.25 per cent by June and the pre-election economic and fiscal outlook forecast it would stay there for another year. Advertisement Maybe Joe not only didn't believe treasury's figures, maybe he didn't read them. What the IMF boffins tend to do every six months is have a chat with the similarly minded nerds in Treasury and the RBA, plus maybe one or two of the more rational private sector economists if they're old mates, and print the Treasury/RBA numbers in their World Economic Outlook publication. Unlike the Treasurer, the IMF actually has plenty of respect for, and faith, in those Australian institutions. So, if the IMF now has a slightly more optimistic outlook for Australian unemployment next year than what Treasury had two months ago, it's possible the official family's faith in a slow pick up next year is increasing. But the Treasurer isn't seeing that, warning instead: "The downside risks documented in the World Economic Outlook confirms significant risks to the Australian budget that will need to be appropriately managed by the Coalition government." Which all boils down to why we no longer have that budget crisis/emergency we used to hear so much about, that the big-picture fiscal policy is not changing at all with the change of government. And that's a relief when there are learners at the wheel. Too bad though that some of the more impressionable news outlets (i.e. the TV and radio where most people still receive their smattering of news) have been running that IMF “downgrade” as if it was indeed news. Time to flick the switch to trying to talk the economy up, Joe, or to provide some balanced comments, instead of talking it down. Michael Pascoe is a BusinessDay contributing editor Read more: http://www.smh.com.au/business/joe-hockeys-lplates-are-there-for-all-to-see-20131009-2v752.html#ixzz2hDnQbYXG
|
|
|
macktheknife
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 16K,
Visits: 0
|
"Kevin Rudd and Julia Gillard couldn't trust Bill Shorten, you shouldn't trust him to run the country. Authorised by Liberal Party Canberra."
|
|
|
rusty
|
|
Group: Banned Members
Posts: 6.1K,
Visits: 0
|
Incredulous how the "rorts" weren't an issue at all prior to the election, now we have a new government, one some people don't like, some are calling for the government to be 'criminally investigated'. Outrageous case of selective moral outrage, it just proves how confused and diabolically hypocritical the biased left wing media is.
|
|
|
rusty
|
|
Group: Banned Members
Posts: 6.1K,
Visits: 0
|
macktheknife wrote:"Kevin Rudd and Julia Gillard couldn't trust Bill Shorten, you shouldn't trust him to run the country. Authorised by Liberal Party Canberra." Nice =d>
|
|
|
batfink
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 9.9K,
Visits: 0
|
what a farce this selection of the ALP's leader is becoming
|
|
|
Scoll
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 1.6K,
Visits: 0
|
batfink wrote:what a farce this selection of the ALP's leader is becoming I am honestly intrigued: how so?
|
|
|
batfink
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 9.9K,
Visits: 0
|
Scoll wrote:batfink wrote:what a farce this selection of the ALP's leader is becoming I am honestly intrigued: how so? wait & see....;)
|
|
|
Scoll
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 1.6K,
Visits: 0
|
That's not an adequate answer, batfink. You have made the observation that the selection of ALP leader is becoming a farce. What evidence do you have of this? If you have anything that proves that this process has been or will be remotely farcical share it, I would love to see it.
|
|
|
notorganic
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 21K,
Visits: 0
|
Scoll wrote:That's not an adequate answer, batfink. You have made the observation that the selection of ALP leader is becoming a farce. What evidence do you have of this? If you have anything that proves that this process has been or will be remotely farcical share it, I would love to see it. Classic misdirection from finky
|
|
|
afromanGT
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 77K,
Visits: 0
|
Batfink makes an accusation and then can't back it up with anything as usual. :lol:
|
|
|
batfink
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 9.9K,
Visits: 0
|
Labor Senator Stephen Conroy labels Kevin Rudd's new leadership-selection rules a 'farce' Updated Thu 12 Sep 2013, 10:16am AEST
Communications Minister Stephen Conroy speaks during a press conference PHOTO: Senator Stephen Conroy says the new Labor leadership rules are a 'farce'. (Alan Porritt, file photo: AAP) RELATED STORY: Emerson blasts Rudd over Labor's downfallRELATED STORY: Bill Shorten says he will stand for Labor leadershipRELATED STORY: Contest hots up for sixth Senate seatRELATED STORY: Rudd reveals plan for Labor leadership voting reform MAP: Australia Senior Labor Senator Stephen Conroy has slammed former prime minister Kevin Rudd's new rules for choosing the ALP's leader, labelling them a "farce".
The new rules stipulate that the leader must be elected jointly by the party membership and by Caucus, with each given equal weighting.
Mr Rudd announced an overhaul of the ALP's leadership-selection process after he returned to the prime ministership in June.
Bill Shorten, a right-wing factional leader, announced on Wednesday that he would run for the leadership, while Anthony Albanese - from Labor's left - has yet to announce whether he will run.
If there is more than one candidate the leadership will go to a vote, but the party-member ballot would take a month to complete.
Opposition split on leadership vote
Meanwhile, the Federal Opposition is split over whether there should be a leadership ballot.
Mr Shorten would likely win a ballot of caucus members owing to his right faction having the numbers.
However, Mr Albanese's left faction has dominated membership ballots for the party presidency and could win overall under the new rules which also give party members a 50 per cent say.
Frontbencher Mark Dreyfus, meantime, is backing Mr Shorten and has told Sky News that he's happy to see a vote.
"I think there's nothing wrong with a bit of democratic process, and if there's a contest, there's a contest, and that's a good thing," he said
Nominations for the Labor leadership open tomorrow and close a week later.
Any ballot would take a further month.
Labor left 'helpless' by Rudd's rules
Mr Rudd's rules were approved by Caucus, but Senator Conroy told Sky News that they make Labor a "laughing stock".
Senator Conroy, a fierce supporter of former prime minister Julia Gillard, said the party's leadership needs to be resolved quickly.
He said the Coalition are "getting away with murder" while Labor's leadership remains in a vacuum.
"We've got no leader, no frontbench, no shadow spokespersons who are able to lead the debate for us, and this will descend into complete and utter farce," he said.
We asked if you agree that the Labor leadership needs to be resolved quickly. "We have a situation where the US might bomb Syria [and] we have no official party spokesman, we have no leader.
"These new rules were a farce when they were put in place - rules that have left us helpless."
Mr Albanese, who served on Ms Gillard's frontbench and rose to deputy PM under Mr Rudd, is expected to make his leadership ambitions known within days.
If Mr Shorten is elected to the leadership, left-wing Sydney MP and former minister Tanya Plibersek would most likely be deputy leader.
Labor MPs will gather in Canberra tomorrow to discuss the leadership.
No election credit for Rudd
Meanwhile, Senator Conroy credited clever campaigning by local MPs, rather than Mr Rudd, for Labor's better-than-expected election result.
Labor defied polls to hold almost all of its seats in Queensland and western Sydney.
Mr Rudd's return to the leadership saw an improvement in the polls for the ALP, but Senator Conroy put Labor's result down to good campaigning from local MPs and state branches.
"The forecast massive losses in western Sydney, in Victoria, and in Queensland didn't eventuate and that's a tribute to the on-the-ground campaigning of the MPs in their seats - it's a tribute to the state branches," he said.
ABC/wires
|
|
|