The Australian Politics thread: Prime Minister Anthony Albanese


The Australian Politics thread: Prime Minister Anthony Albanese

Author
Message
afromanGT
afromanGT
Legend
Legend (77K reputation)Legend (77K reputation)Legend (77K reputation)Legend (77K reputation)Legend (77K reputation)Legend (77K reputation)Legend (77K reputation)Legend (77K reputation)Legend (77K reputation)Legend (77K reputation)Legend (77K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 77K, Visits: 0
Queensland Parliament is an "out of control" party.
Edited
9 Years Ago by afromanGT
paulbagzFC
paulbagzFC
Legend
Legend (45K reputation)Legend (45K reputation)Legend (45K reputation)Legend (45K reputation)Legend (45K reputation)Legend (45K reputation)Legend (45K reputation)Legend (45K reputation)Legend (45K reputation)Legend (45K reputation)Legend (45K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 44K, Visits: 0
afromanGT wrote:
notorganic wrote:
Indonesia has been very careful in their language here.

Tony's cooked.

:-S The events happened under Rudd's tenure didn't they?


Stolen generation was decades ago but that didn't stop Howard etc from apologizing.

-PB

https://i.imgur.com/batge7K.jpg

Edited
9 Years Ago by paulbagzFC
paulbagzFC
paulbagzFC
Legend
Legend (45K reputation)Legend (45K reputation)Legend (45K reputation)Legend (45K reputation)Legend (45K reputation)Legend (45K reputation)Legend (45K reputation)Legend (45K reputation)Legend (45K reputation)Legend (45K reputation)Legend (45K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 44K, Visits: 0
macktheknife wrote:
mcjules wrote:
batfink wrote:
macktheknife wrote:
batfink wrote:
paulbagzFC wrote:
batfink wrote:
macktheknife wrote:
paulbagzFC wrote:
[youtube]Rq6ghGoEp_4[/youtube]

-PB


Watched that last night. Disgraceful.

Copper can do gigabit.

Over 50 meters of Cat 6 ethernet cable.

But this is going to be 400 meter line lengths, on technology that Ziggy himself said isn't in anywhere, it's pie in the sky stuff to compare it to FTTP which could probably do 1000/400 right now (which NBN have planned to release next month).

Then there comes the revelation that Henry Ergas is doing the CBA.

A man who has done his own CBA on the NBN, and came back with "we shouldn't do it at all."

Not to mention all the executives on the board being tapped on the shoulder before the Government were even in Government, which last time I checked is pretty fucking sketchy and not the done thing.

](*,) ](*,) ](*,)




we are currently installing copper that can do 10 gigabits over 90metres.....the spec saying cat6 can do 1 gig over 90 metres is just that a standard......there is heaps of headroom and there are installs transmitting 10 gig on cat6A over 300 metres.....and 1 gig on cat6A cable over much further distances.....


10GbE on Cat7 which requires a far far higher power input/output and that technology isn't applicable for something like NBN (it's a core->server or edge type medium connection only) and certainly not at lengths of more then 100m lol.

-PB



no we are doing 10gig on cat6A, in the lab cat6a is doing gig over rather long lengths, seen it experienced it....it's not smoke and mirrors...cat 7 and future standrads are yet to be fully ratified ....


That's only good at less than 100 meters.

At which point, you might as well just build FTTP all the way anyway, since you'll end up needing half a million nodes for a FTTN plan with 100 meter lengths into the house and you need to replace the copper going into the house from the existing copper to new copper.


incorrect...the 100m is only the distance stipulates in the standards that we have to adhere to during installation, it's a recommendation.....i have sites in sydney for my clients running 10gig over cat6a for 150m easily.....cheacked it with a LAN network analyser.....we have a factory in blacktown running 1 gig over 450m with no problems....its running over cat6a 1091c systimax cabling

With enough strands of pure copper, insulation and enough electricity you can have as much bandwidth as you like. I'm sure what the point of this argument is?


The argument is pointless and I'm done with it, because he keeps bringing up local area network quality ethernet cables as some kind of justification for a FTTN connection that doesn't use that sort of copper wiring anyway.


This.

To get any kind of speeds like that involves running completely new wiring (a full 4 pairs, not just 1) in order to get bandwidth at those levels at the lengths of 100m or so.

-PB

https://i.imgur.com/batge7K.jpg

Edited
9 Years Ago by paulbagzFC
afromanGT
afromanGT
Legend
Legend (77K reputation)Legend (77K reputation)Legend (77K reputation)Legend (77K reputation)Legend (77K reputation)Legend (77K reputation)Legend (77K reputation)Legend (77K reputation)Legend (77K reputation)Legend (77K reputation)Legend (77K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 77K, Visits: 0
Mr wrote:
and was doing what Abbott largely wanted on boats.

TIL: Telling abbott to fuck off was "largely what he wanted".
Edited
9 Years Ago by afromanGT
Mr
Mr
World Class
World Class (6.1K reputation)World Class (6.1K reputation)World Class (6.1K reputation)World Class (6.1K reputation)World Class (6.1K reputation)World Class (6.1K reputation)World Class (6.1K reputation)World Class (6.1K reputation)World Class (6.1K reputation)World Class (6.1K reputation)World Class (6.1K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 6K, Visits: 0
Roar_Brisbane wrote:
Madness.

Quote:
Queensland party crackdown out of control
By Chris Berg

But for all the absurdities of the anti-bikies legislation, the bill currently being considered by the Queensland parliament is probably worse.

The bogey-man in this bill is "out-of-control" parties. No doubt you can conjure up such a threat to public order in your mind. Hundreds of drunk teenagers spilling out on the street and damaging nearby property.

But according to the draft bill, a party is a gathering of twelve or more people. And it is considered out-of-control if three people at that party do something like be drunk in a public place, cause excessive noise, unreasonably block the path of a pedestrian, litter in a way that might cause harm to the environment, or use "indecent" language.

The punishment for holding a party that gets out-of-control? A $12,000 fine or a year's jail. In other words, a party host is punished for the actions of party guests. For good measure, the bill allows police to enter property uninvited without a warrant.
http://www.abc.net.au/news/2013-11-19/berg-queensland-party-crackdown-out-of-control/5101438


Bjelke-Petersen could only dream of these powers. It's legitimising fascist like policing. Remember it took almost 20 years to undo the corruption and despair he left. And in barely two years the herpes-like LNP have accelerated the digging of the darkest hole is Australia.
Edited
9 Years Ago by Mr
Mr
Mr
World Class
World Class (6.1K reputation)World Class (6.1K reputation)World Class (6.1K reputation)World Class (6.1K reputation)World Class (6.1K reputation)World Class (6.1K reputation)World Class (6.1K reputation)World Class (6.1K reputation)World Class (6.1K reputation)World Class (6.1K reputation)World Class (6.1K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 6K, Visits: 0
afromanGT wrote:
Mr wrote:
and was doing what Abbott largely wanted on boats.

TIL: Telling abbott to fuck off was "largely what he wanted".


Actually yes. Once the boat went public they couldn't lose face. But actually received two boats back before that.

Make no mistake, you're witnessing a seminal moment. Let's pray it ends well.
Edited
9 Years Ago by Mr
afromanGT
afromanGT
Legend
Legend (77K reputation)Legend (77K reputation)Legend (77K reputation)Legend (77K reputation)Legend (77K reputation)Legend (77K reputation)Legend (77K reputation)Legend (77K reputation)Legend (77K reputation)Legend (77K reputation)Legend (77K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 77K, Visits: 0
paulbagzFC wrote:
afromanGT wrote:
notorganic wrote:
Indonesia has been very careful in their language here.

Tony's cooked.

:-S The events happened under Rudd's tenure didn't they?


Stolen generation was decades ago but that didn't stop Howard etc from apologizing.

-PB

That was completely different. Rudd wasn't being criticized for the actions of those politicians in front of the international community.
mr wrote:
Actually yes. Once the boat went public they couldn't lose face. But actually received two boats back before that.

Have you got a source for that?
Edited
9 Years Ago by afromanGT
Mr
Mr
World Class
World Class (6.1K reputation)World Class (6.1K reputation)World Class (6.1K reputation)World Class (6.1K reputation)World Class (6.1K reputation)World Class (6.1K reputation)World Class (6.1K reputation)World Class (6.1K reputation)World Class (6.1K reputation)World Class (6.1K reputation)World Class (6.1K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 6K, Visits: 0
afromanGT wrote:

mr wrote:
Actually yes. Once the boat went public they couldn't lose face. But actually received two boats back before that.

Have you got a source for that?


Yes.
http://m.theaustralian.com.au/news/features/some-stumbles-but-boats-are-stopping/story-e6frg6z6-1226759294151
Edited
9 Years Ago by Mr
afromanGT
afromanGT
Legend
Legend (77K reputation)Legend (77K reputation)Legend (77K reputation)Legend (77K reputation)Legend (77K reputation)Legend (77K reputation)Legend (77K reputation)Legend (77K reputation)Legend (77K reputation)Legend (77K reputation)Legend (77K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 77K, Visits: 0
Mr wrote:
afromanGT wrote:

mr wrote:
Actually yes. Once the boat went public they couldn't lose face. But actually received two boats back before that.

Have you got a source for that?


Yes.
http://m.theaustralian.com.au/news/features/some-stumbles-but-boats-are-stopping/story-e6frg6z6-1226759294151

Link to premium subscription article so it can't be verified. Good job.

So what you're saying is that once the boats being turned back went public they couldn't lose face. But it's gone public so they've lost face. Good ol' fashioned Catch 22 you've written there.
Edited
9 Years Ago by afromanGT
notorganic
notorganic
Legend
Legend (21K reputation)Legend (21K reputation)Legend (21K reputation)Legend (21K reputation)Legend (21K reputation)Legend (21K reputation)Legend (21K reputation)Legend (21K reputation)Legend (21K reputation)Legend (21K reputation)Legend (21K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 21K, Visits: 0
http://www.smh.com.au/it-pro/government-it/telstras-copper-is-nearly-beyond-repair-and-an-absolute-disgrace-union-20131120-hv3mp.html

Quote:
Telstra's copper is 'nearly beyond repair' and 'an absolute disgrace': union


A temporary fix to Telstra's copper as seen by field staff in NSW's Illawarra region. Photo: CEPU

The union representing Telstra field staff says the telco's copper-wire network is "beyond repair" and "an absolute disgrace", casting new doubts over the federal government's plans to use it to deliver faster broadband in its mixed-technology national broadband network (NBN).

The comments follow assertions from Telstra on Monday that the century-old copper network is not ageing. Then, in response to a report by Fairfax Media, Telstra's wholesale division managing director, Stuart Lee, denied the copper asset had deteriorated.
Shane Murphy, assistant secretary of the Communications, Electrical and Plumbing Union's New South Wales branch, said the network was nearly beyond repair.

"Replacing the broken bit right now would be [just about] replacing the [whole] network," he said.

Advertisement
"The network is an absolute disgrace," Mr Murphy added. "It's full of plastic bags [and] ring-barked cables."

The union has provided photographs that appear to show a number of Telstra pits in the Illawara region, in NSW, where recycled plastic bottles and bags have been used to insulate wires. Photos also show tangled wires, wires submerged in water and wet even when inside the plastic shieds.

Mr Lee has said the copper network was fixed as required.

"It's like grandfather's axe; It's had five new handles and three new heads. When it breaks, we replace the broken bit. So it's much the same as it always has been and always will be," Mr Lee said.

Mr Murphy described Mr Lee's comments as "an absolute bollock".

"It's doesn't matter which capital city of the country you live in, or country town, as soon as they get a dosage of rain, up goes the amount of outages of customer services or internet faults. And that is due to the state of the Telstra network. It is nearly beyond repair."

On Wednesday, a Telstra spokeswoman told Fairfax Media the company put temporary fixes in place "from time to time" to ensure continuity of service until a permanent repair was available.

"How many [temporary fixes] are in place and techniques used will differ at different times and circumstances," the spokeswoman said.

The age of the copper network varied "greatly", the spokeswoman added.

"But with the rolling remediation program we have in place to restore and replace copper it would rarely be older than 30 years."

Good for 'another 100' years

Mr Murphy said Telstra would need to invest "millions and millions" of dollars to bring the copper network up to scratch to survive the next 20 years. This was despite Telstra chief executive officer David Thodey saying in June that the network would "keep going for another 100" years.

"The union finds it alarming that the CEO or anyone within Telstra believes the copper network is in shape to last another 100 years," Mr Murphy said.

Mr Murphy said the network was in a bad state because Telstra field staff were measured on the number of jobs they did each day and not on the quality of the work.

"Telstra over the last five to ten years since privatisation has driven a system of as many jobs per day and pushing the guys to the next job at the expense of quality customer service," Mr Murphy said.

"The [field staff] are not left with any amount of time to sit on the job and fix the job properly. They are simply band-aiding the customers' repair and being pushed to the next job. And managers' bonuses are being based on the amount of jobs workers are doing per day."

But Telstra's spokeswoman disputed this, saying quality workmanship was measured as well as quantity.

Mr Lee's comments come as Telstra prepares to renegotiate its $11 billion national broadband network deal with the Coalition government, which wants to make use of the copper in its fibre-to-the-node rollout for 71 per cent of premises. The node-based network uses up to several hundred metres of existing copper wires running from the local node to each premise.

NBN Co's executive chairman, Dr Switkowski, told the Communications and Environment Senate estimates committee on Tuesday night he was confident Telstra's copper network "continues to perform robustly". He noted that fault rates were now higher than in the last decade because of rain. Copper faults increase after rain.

However, there were already millions of people accessing ADSL broadband services through Telstra's customer access network, as the copper network is known, Dr Switkowski said.

"That suggests to me the network is robust still and the concerns that are expressed about ... the network [that it] may not be the basis for the next generation broadband platform, I think, are misinformed," Dr Switkowski said.

Labor Senator Kate Lundy asked if NBN Co would get access to accurate data about the condition and quality of Telstra's network before it re-enters negotiations or decides whether to ditch Labor's plan of rolling out fibre-to-the-home for 93 per cent of premises in favour of rolling out fibre-to-the-node for 73 per cent.

"If we don't have data in detail by the time of the drafting of the review then assumptions will be made ... it is the task of one of the advisory groups to do that," Dr Switkowski replied.

NBN Co's new chief operating officer, Greg Adcock, confirmed at the hearing that NBN Co would test parts of Telstra's copper underground network before it made any definitive moves to a fibre-to-the-node design.

"The current thinking is that there would be testing done. Whether it informs the strategic review or whether the strategic review makes some assumptions to be then tested, I think that is the way we would frame it at this point," Mr Adcock said.

The federal government will either buy the network or lease it. Buying it would likely require the government-owned NBN Co to maintain the network, while leasing it could potentially see that left to Telstra.

The state of Australia's copper network has long been a focus because critics say that it has deteriorated and might not provide the speed of 100 megabits per second the Coalition eventually wants to deliver over it, with technologies like VDSL2 vectoring.

The Coalition has promised to replace any copper that doesn't achieve the speeds promised but critics say the true state of the copper network is not known, and its costly replacement could blowout the Coalition's NBN costings.

With Lucy Battersby

Edited
9 Years Ago by notorganic
Mr
Mr
World Class
World Class (6.1K reputation)World Class (6.1K reputation)World Class (6.1K reputation)World Class (6.1K reputation)World Class (6.1K reputation)World Class (6.1K reputation)World Class (6.1K reputation)World Class (6.1K reputation)World Class (6.1K reputation)World Class (6.1K reputation)World Class (6.1K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 6K, Visits: 0
afromanGT wrote:
Mr wrote:
afromanGT wrote:

mr wrote:
Actually yes. Once the boat went public they couldn't lose face. But actually received two boats back before that.

Have you got a source for that?


Yes.
http://m.theaustralian.com.au/news/features/some-stumbles-but-boats-are-stopping/story-e6frg6z6-1226759294151

Link to premium subscription article so it can't be verified. Good job.

So what you're saying is that once the boats being turned back went public they couldn't lose face. But it's gone public so they've lost face. Good ol' fashioned Catch 22 you've written there.


Look it worked for me, but I'm mobile. ABC covered the same two transfers at sea.

http://mobile.abc.net.au/news/2013-09-27/navy-transfers-asylum-seekers-to-indonesia/4985674
Edited
9 Years Ago by Mr
batfink
batfink
Legend
Legend (10K reputation)Legend (10K reputation)Legend (10K reputation)Legend (10K reputation)Legend (10K reputation)Legend (10K reputation)Legend (10K reputation)Legend (10K reputation)Legend (10K reputation)Legend (10K reputation)Legend (10K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 9.9K, Visits: 0
afromanGT wrote:
notorganic wrote:
If you'd like to stop throwing up red herrings, ad hominems and straw men I would be more than happy to discuss why you are wrong.

I love it when you do this, throwing out a statement which in itself is a strawman.



hear hear...!!!! or is it

here here??????

\:d/ \:d/ \:d/ ;)
Edited
9 Years Ago by batfink
batfink
batfink
Legend
Legend (10K reputation)Legend (10K reputation)Legend (10K reputation)Legend (10K reputation)Legend (10K reputation)Legend (10K reputation)Legend (10K reputation)Legend (10K reputation)Legend (10K reputation)Legend (10K reputation)Legend (10K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 9.9K, Visits: 0
notorganic wrote:
batfink wrote:
RedKat wrote:
So what exactly did Australia do wrong?

Or is it a 'oooo lets just senselessly attack Abbott'



the later....desperate people


I'd love to hear your assessment of the job Abbott has done so far, Batfink.



in regards to?????
Edited
9 Years Ago by batfink
batfink
batfink
Legend
Legend (10K reputation)Legend (10K reputation)Legend (10K reputation)Legend (10K reputation)Legend (10K reputation)Legend (10K reputation)Legend (10K reputation)Legend (10K reputation)Legend (10K reputation)Legend (10K reputation)Legend (10K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 9.9K, Visits: 0
afromanGT wrote:
notorganic wrote:
afromanGT wrote:
notorganic wrote:
Indonesia has been very careful in their language here.

Tony's cooked.

:-S The events happened under Rudd's tenure didn't they?


The events are not the issue. The response is.

I'm not sure why this is such a hard concept for people to grasp.

The response is difficult and precarious. But how do you handle a scenario like that? Get on your knees and grovel for forgiveness? If he did that people would be calling him soft and too readily willing to take it up the arse from Indonesia. Point out that Indonesia were caught spying on us in the past? If he did that he'd be accused of potentially inflaming the scenario.

It's a bit of a no-win position to be in.


well Afro i never thought it possible....but that is a 100% correct analysis of the situation that i agree with 100%....good objective post...(for once...he he he he)

;) =d> =d> =d> =d>
Edited
9 Years Ago by batfink
batfink
batfink
Legend
Legend (10K reputation)Legend (10K reputation)Legend (10K reputation)Legend (10K reputation)Legend (10K reputation)Legend (10K reputation)Legend (10K reputation)Legend (10K reputation)Legend (10K reputation)Legend (10K reputation)Legend (10K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 9.9K, Visits: 0
afromanGT wrote:
mcjules wrote:
afromanGT wrote:
Quote:
With enough strands of pure copper, insulation and enough electricity you can have as much bandwidth as you like. I'm sure what the point of this argument is?

Untrue. Light travels faster than electrical current.

That doesn't explain how it's untrue, just that fibre optics are more efficient. No argument from me there.

It's not a case of simply adding more wires, there's only so fast a copper wire can transport a signal. And it's significantly slower than fibreoptics.


there are two main ratings of Fibre an copper, there is the bandwidth measured in hertz and the speed which is measured in bits, here are some of the basic specs


x OM1 legacy (“FDDI”) grade fiber originally was designed for use with 1300 nm LEDs
that operate at speeds of 100 Mbps (Million bits per second). Fiber Distributed Data
Interface (FDDI) was a prevailing data transmission protocol when 62.5 µm MMF was
introduced, but has since been displaced, primarily by Ethernet. Corning Cable
Systems recommends 50 µm MMF (OM3 or OM4) for all new LAN/DC installations in
lieu of LANscape 62.5 fiber types.

x OM2 fiber enables extension of legacy 50 µm MMF cabling. For entry-level One
Gigabit (1 GbE) speed performance, Corning Cable Systems product offering is
referred to as LANscape Pretium® 150 optical fiber. OM2 is no longer
recommended for new installations due to the continued migration to 10 GbE and 10
Gbps Fibre Channel in data centers world-wide.

x OM3 laser-optimized fiber is the minimum recommended performance level for new
LAN/DC installations today. Corning Cable Systems’ LANscape Pretium 300 is
suitable for 10 Gbps data rates up to 300 m and emerging 40 and 100 Gbps data
rates up to 100 m. OM3 is fully compatible with legacy OM2 installations.

x OM4 is a laser-optimized fiber that further extends the capabilities of OM3, and is fully
compatible with legacy OM3 and OM2 installations. Corning Cable Systems’
LANscape Pretium 550 is suitable for 10 Gbps data rates up to at least 550 m and
emerging 40 and 100 Gbps data rates up to 150 m. OM4 is recommended when
OM3 distance ranges are exceeded, or it is anticipated they will be exceeded in the
future.




Edited
9 Years Ago by batfink
batfink
batfink
Legend
Legend (10K reputation)Legend (10K reputation)Legend (10K reputation)Legend (10K reputation)Legend (10K reputation)Legend (10K reputation)Legend (10K reputation)Legend (10K reputation)Legend (10K reputation)Legend (10K reputation)Legend (10K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 9.9K, Visits: 0
macktheknife wrote:
mcjules wrote:
batfink wrote:
macktheknife wrote:
batfink wrote:
paulbagzFC wrote:
batfink wrote:
macktheknife wrote:
paulbagzFC wrote:
[youtube]Rq6ghGoEp_4[/youtube]

-PB


Watched that last night. Disgraceful.

Copper can do gigabit.

Over 50 meters of Cat 6 ethernet cable.

But this is going to be 400 meter line lengths, on technology that Ziggy himself said isn't in anywhere, it's pie in the sky stuff to compare it to FTTP which could probably do 1000/400 right now (which NBN have planned to release next month).

Then there comes the revelation that Henry Ergas is doing the CBA.

A man who has done his own CBA on the NBN, and came back with "we shouldn't do it at all."

Not to mention all the executives on the board being tapped on the shoulder before the Government were even in Government, which last time I checked is pretty fucking sketchy and not the done thing.

](*,) ](*,) ](*,)




we are currently installing copper that can do 10 gigabits over 90metres.....the spec saying cat6 can do 1 gig over 90 metres is just that a standard......there is heaps of headroom and there are installs transmitting 10 gig on cat6A over 300 metres.....and 1 gig on cat6A cable over much further distances.....


10GbE on Cat7 which requires a far far higher power input/output and that technology isn't applicable for something like NBN (it's a core->server or edge type medium connection only) and certainly not at lengths of more then 100m lol.

-PB



no we are doing 10gig on cat6A, in the lab cat6a is doing gig over rather long lengths, seen it experienced it....it's not smoke and mirrors...cat 7 and future standrads are yet to be fully ratified ....


That's only good at less than 100 meters.

At which point, you might as well just build FTTP all the way anyway, since you'll end up needing half a million nodes for a FTTN plan with 100 meter lengths into the house and you need to replace the copper going into the house from the existing copper to new copper.


incorrect...the 100m is only the distance stipulates in the standards that we have to adhere to during installation, it's a recommendation.....i have sites in sydney for my clients running 10gig over cat6a for 150m easily.....cheacked it with a LAN network analyser.....we have a factory in blacktown running 1 gig over 450m with no problems....its running over cat6a 1091c systimax cabling

With enough strands of pure copper, insulation and enough electricity you can have as much bandwidth as you like. I'm sure what the point of this argument is?


The argument is pointless and I'm done with it, because he keeps bringing up local area network quality ethernet cables as some kind of justification for a FTTN connection that doesn't use that sort of copper wiring anyway.


well the argument you are putting forward is that copper cant meet some of those speeds, which is just incorrect.....over U.T.P. the speeds are quite high and well above those quoted in the standards, also with rather good bandwidth capabilities......


Edited
9 Years Ago by batfink
batfink
batfink
Legend
Legend (10K reputation)Legend (10K reputation)Legend (10K reputation)Legend (10K reputation)Legend (10K reputation)Legend (10K reputation)Legend (10K reputation)Legend (10K reputation)Legend (10K reputation)Legend (10K reputation)Legend (10K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 9.9K, Visits: 0
paulbagzFC wrote:
batfink wrote:
macktheknife wrote:
batfink wrote:
paulbagzFC wrote:
batfink wrote:
macktheknife wrote:
paulbagzFC wrote:
[youtube]Rq6ghGoEp_4[/youtube]

-PB


Watched that last night. Disgraceful.

Copper can do gigabit.

Over 50 meters of Cat 6 ethernet cable.

But this is going to be 400 meter line lengths, on technology that Ziggy himself said isn't in anywhere, it's pie in the sky stuff to compare it to FTTP which could probably do 1000/400 right now (which NBN have planned to release next month).

Then there comes the revelation that Henry Ergas is doing the CBA.

A man who has done his own CBA on the NBN, and came back with "we shouldn't do it at all."

Not to mention all the executives on the board being tapped on the shoulder before the Government were even in Government, which last time I checked is pretty fucking sketchy and not the done thing.

](*,) ](*,) ](*,)




we are currently installing copper that can do 10 gigabits over 90metres.....the spec saying cat6 can do 1 gig over 90 metres is just that a standard......there is heaps of headroom and there are installs transmitting 10 gig on cat6A over 300 metres.....and 1 gig on cat6A cable over much further distances.....


10GbE on Cat7 which requires a far far higher power input/output and that technology isn't applicable for something like NBN (it's a core->server or edge type medium connection only) and certainly not at lengths of more then 100m lol.

-PB



no we are doing 10gig on cat6A, in the lab cat6a is doing gig over rather long lengths, seen it experienced it....it's not smoke and mirrors...cat 7 and future standrads are yet to be fully ratified ....


That's only good at less than 100 meters.

At which point, you might as well just build FTTP all the way anyway, since you'll end up needing half a million nodes for a FTTN plan with 100 meter lengths into the house and you need to replace the copper going into the house from the existing copper to new copper.


incorrect...the 100m is only the distance stipulates in the standards that we have to adhere to during installation, it's a recommendation.....i have sites in sydney for my clients running 10gig over cat6a for 150m easily.....cheacked it with a LAN network analyser.....we have a factory in blacktown running 1 gig over 450m with no problems....its running over cat6a 1091c systimax cabling


I find that very hard to believe considering that even high grade transceivers will have signal loss at anything above 100m, once again, seen it first hand, I work with this stuff day in day out.

Also once again, not a liable solution for something like NBN where average cable runs back to exchanges are in values of kilometers, not <100m.

-PB


well i must be lying then.....[-( been cabling as a specialised data specialist for over 25 years.....and the runs from the nodes are designed to be far less.....

listen FTTP is a better solution...no doubt...politically and financially that a different story.....
Edited
9 Years Ago by batfink
paulbagzFC
paulbagzFC
Legend
Legend (45K reputation)Legend (45K reputation)Legend (45K reputation)Legend (45K reputation)Legend (45K reputation)Legend (45K reputation)Legend (45K reputation)Legend (45K reputation)Legend (45K reputation)Legend (45K reputation)Legend (45K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 44K, Visits: 0
batfink wrote:
paulbagzFC wrote:
batfink wrote:
macktheknife wrote:
batfink wrote:
paulbagzFC wrote:
batfink wrote:
macktheknife wrote:
paulbagzFC wrote:
[youtube]Rq6ghGoEp_4[/youtube]

-PB


Watched that last night. Disgraceful.

Copper can do gigabit.

Over 50 meters of Cat 6 ethernet cable.

But this is going to be 400 meter line lengths, on technology that Ziggy himself said isn't in anywhere, it's pie in the sky stuff to compare it to FTTP which could probably do 1000/400 right now (which NBN have planned to release next month).

Then there comes the revelation that Henry Ergas is doing the CBA.

A man who has done his own CBA on the NBN, and came back with "we shouldn't do it at all."

Not to mention all the executives on the board being tapped on the shoulder before the Government were even in Government, which last time I checked is pretty fucking sketchy and not the done thing.

](*,) ](*,) ](*,)




we are currently installing copper that can do 10 gigabits over 90metres.....the spec saying cat6 can do 1 gig over 90 metres is just that a standard......there is heaps of headroom and there are installs transmitting 10 gig on cat6A over 300 metres.....and 1 gig on cat6A cable over much further distances.....


10GbE on Cat7 which requires a far far higher power input/output and that technology isn't applicable for something like NBN (it's a core->server or edge type medium connection only) and certainly not at lengths of more then 100m lol.

-PB



no we are doing 10gig on cat6A, in the lab cat6a is doing gig over rather long lengths, seen it experienced it....it's not smoke and mirrors...cat 7 and future standrads are yet to be fully ratified ....


That's only good at less than 100 meters.

At which point, you might as well just build FTTP all the way anyway, since you'll end up needing half a million nodes for a FTTN plan with 100 meter lengths into the house and you need to replace the copper going into the house from the existing copper to new copper.


incorrect...the 100m is only the distance stipulates in the standards that we have to adhere to during installation, it's a recommendation.....i have sites in sydney for my clients running 10gig over cat6a for 150m easily.....cheacked it with a LAN network analyser.....we have a factory in blacktown running 1 gig over 450m with no problems....its running over cat6a 1091c systimax cabling


I find that very hard to believe considering that even high grade transceivers will have signal loss at anything above 100m, once again, seen it first hand, I work with this stuff day in day out.

Also once again, not a liable solution for something like NBN where average cable runs back to exchanges are in values of kilometers, not <100m.

-PB


well i must be lying then.....[-( been cabling as a specialised data specialist for over 25 years.....and the runs from the nodes are designed to be far less.....

listen FTTP is a better solution...no doubt...politically and financially that a different story.....


Never said that copper couldn't do those speeds, not at all. What I said was it couldn't do those speeds reliably above the distances that the standards were put in place for and I also said that such a technology wouldn't be viable for something like the NBN (and I also said that such interconnects are designed for inter-campus/LAN based technologies just like mack said).

Never said you didn't know your stuff batfink, just disagreed that such a solution was viable for FTTN.

P.S. I am a Network Engineer who has worked in the industry alongside HP's Networking division for a several years now and manage a large scale fibre network everyday that employs all of those technologies you have listed previously.

-PB



https://i.imgur.com/batge7K.jpg

Edited
9 Years Ago by paulbagzFC
Roar_Brisbane
Roar_Brisbane
Legend
Legend (14K reputation)Legend (14K reputation)Legend (14K reputation)Legend (14K reputation)Legend (14K reputation)Legend (14K reputation)Legend (14K reputation)Legend (14K reputation)Legend (14K reputation)Legend (14K reputation)Legend (14K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 14K, Visits: 0
Quote:
Qld cops to be protected from civil action
Queensland police officers who injure civilians or damage property while on duty will be protected from legal action by their victims under a proposed law change.

Victims would instead have to sue the state in a move Premier Campbell Newman said would allow officers to "get on with the job of protecting our community" without fear of action if they make a mistake.

The changes introduced in the Public Service and Other Legislation (Civil Liability) Amendment Bill would allow the state to recover money from individual officers if they were found to have acted "other than in good faith and with gross negligence".

"In the often highly complex situations they (police) respond to, and despite performing their roles professionally and in good faith, the nature of their business means there are occasional incidents that cause injury to people or damage to property," Mr Newman told parliament as he tabled the bill on Tuesday night.

"The potential consequences that flow to the individual officer as a result of these unfortunate occurrences - the threat of civil liability - place unnecessary pressure on officers and has the potential to impact decision making, especially in high-pressure, operational situations.

"This can ultimately reduce the level of service that police are willing and able to provide to our community."
http://au.news.yahoo.com/a/19927453/qld-cops-to-be-protected-from-civil-action/

Edited
9 Years Ago by Roar_Brisbane
paulbagzFC
paulbagzFC
Legend
Legend (45K reputation)Legend (45K reputation)Legend (45K reputation)Legend (45K reputation)Legend (45K reputation)Legend (45K reputation)Legend (45K reputation)Legend (45K reputation)Legend (45K reputation)Legend (45K reputation)Legend (45K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 44K, Visits: 0
That's not open up to abuse at all :lol:

-PB

https://i.imgur.com/batge7K.jpg

Edited
9 Years Ago by paulbagzFC
paulbagzFC
paulbagzFC
Legend
Legend (45K reputation)Legend (45K reputation)Legend (45K reputation)Legend (45K reputation)Legend (45K reputation)Legend (45K reputation)Legend (45K reputation)Legend (45K reputation)Legend (45K reputation)Legend (45K reputation)Legend (45K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 44K, Visits: 0
Quote:
Liberal strategist Mark Textor under fire for comparing Indonesian foreign minister to porn star

Liberal Party campaign strategist Mark Textor is under fire for statements he made yesterday on Twitter, criticising Indonesia's response to the phone tapping revelations.

In one of a series of comments - that have since been deleted - Mr Textor said: "Apology demanded from Australia by a bloke who looks like a 1970's Pilipino [sic] porn star and has ethics to match".

He appeared to be referring to Indonesian foreign minister Marty Natalegawa, though that was not confirmed by Mr Textor.

The Liberal pollster also said that no Indonesian had been bombed in Australia, a comment that was accompanied by photos of the Bali bombers.

His comments, which come as the damaging standoff over the allegations drags on, made the front page of Indonesian news website Kompass.

Mr Textor, who touts himself as being in the Prime Minister's inner circle and whose market research firm CrosbyTextor has been associated with the Liberal Party for many years, declined to comment to the ABC this morning.


Oh LNP :lol:

-PB

https://i.imgur.com/batge7K.jpg

Edited
9 Years Ago by paulbagzFC
afromanGT
afromanGT
Legend
Legend (77K reputation)Legend (77K reputation)Legend (77K reputation)Legend (77K reputation)Legend (77K reputation)Legend (77K reputation)Legend (77K reputation)Legend (77K reputation)Legend (77K reputation)Legend (77K reputation)Legend (77K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 77K, Visits: 0
batfink wrote:
afromanGT wrote:
mcjules wrote:
afromanGT wrote:
Quote:
With enough strands of pure copper, insulation and enough electricity you can have as much bandwidth as you like. I'm sure what the point of this argument is?

Untrue. Light travels faster than electrical current.

That doesn't explain how it's untrue, just that fibre optics are more efficient. No argument from me there.

It's not a case of simply adding more wires, there's only so fast a copper wire can transport a signal. And it's significantly slower than fibreoptics.


there are two main ratings of Fibre an copper, there is the bandwidth measured in hertz and the speed which is measured in bits, here are some of the basic specs

I could be mistaken but isn't it the other way around? Bandwidth is measured in bits and speed is indicated in hertz - hertz being the number of wave cycles completed in a second.

Point is, you can't simply keep adding copper wires and expecting it to go faster, it has a limited capacity in the physical conductivity of the copper comparative to the capacity of the fibre optics. Copper's conductivity is roughly 66% comparative to the speed of light - or fibre optic exchange (roughly 3.0x10^9 m/s)
Edited
9 Years Ago by afromanGT
433
433
World Class
World Class (6.9K reputation)World Class (6.9K reputation)World Class (6.9K reputation)World Class (6.9K reputation)World Class (6.9K reputation)World Class (6.9K reputation)World Class (6.9K reputation)World Class (6.9K reputation)World Class (6.9K reputation)World Class (6.9K reputation)World Class (6.9K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 6.7K, Visits: 0
With regards the Abbott refusal to apologize:

C'mon guys, I think you're being a tad unreasonable. Do you want him to put his hand up and apologize for something done by the previous government? Something he wasn't responsible for? Hell, I'd rather a PM who stood up for something instead of Kevin who would probably have sucked Bangbang I'vegotayoyo off again.


Edited
9 Years Ago by 433
macktheknife
macktheknife
Legend
Legend (16K reputation)Legend (16K reputation)Legend (16K reputation)Legend (16K reputation)Legend (16K reputation)Legend (16K reputation)Legend (16K reputation)Legend (16K reputation)Legend (16K reputation)Legend (16K reputation)Legend (16K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 16K, Visits: 0
Intelligence & Diplomatic matters are handled on a bi-partisan basis without national politics being brought into it.
Edited
9 Years Ago by macktheknife
433
433
World Class
World Class (6.9K reputation)World Class (6.9K reputation)World Class (6.9K reputation)World Class (6.9K reputation)World Class (6.9K reputation)World Class (6.9K reputation)World Class (6.9K reputation)World Class (6.9K reputation)World Class (6.9K reputation)World Class (6.9K reputation)World Class (6.9K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 6.7K, Visits: 0
Not what I'm talking about.

It's about national pride, not petty political squabbles.
Edited
9 Years Ago by 433
Glory Recruit
Glory Recruit
Legend
Legend (14K reputation)Legend (14K reputation)Legend (14K reputation)Legend (14K reputation)Legend (14K reputation)Legend (14K reputation)Legend (14K reputation)Legend (14K reputation)Legend (14K reputation)Legend (14K reputation)Legend (14K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 13K, Visits: 0
We should be spying on Indonesia, it's Indonesia...not the U.K. or New Zealand.



Edited
9 Years Ago by Iridium1010
Fourfiveone
Fourfiveone
Semi-Pro
Semi-Pro (1.1K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.1K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.1K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.1K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.1K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.1K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.1K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.1K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.1K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.1K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.1K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 1.1K, Visits: 0
433 wrote:
With regards the Abbott refusal to apologize:

C'mon guys, I think you're being a tad unreasonable. Do you want him to put his hand up and apologize for something done by the previous government? Something he wasn't responsible for? Hell, I'd rather a PM who stood up for something instead of Kevin who would probably have sucked Bangbang I'vegotayoyo off again.



I think its unfair to give him a free pass, he didn't stop it from happening. For sure he would have known about it.
Edited
9 Years Ago by Fourfiveone
433
433
World Class
World Class (6.9K reputation)World Class (6.9K reputation)World Class (6.9K reputation)World Class (6.9K reputation)World Class (6.9K reputation)World Class (6.9K reputation)World Class (6.9K reputation)World Class (6.9K reputation)World Class (6.9K reputation)World Class (6.9K reputation)World Class (6.9K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 6.7K, Visits: 0
Fourfiveone wrote:
433 wrote:
With regards the Abbott refusal to apologize:

C'mon guys, I think you're being a tad unreasonable. Do you want him to put his hand up and apologize for something done by the previous government? Something he wasn't responsible for? Hell, I'd rather a PM who stood up for something instead of Kevin who would probably have sucked Bangbang I'vegotayoyo off again.



I think its unfair to give him a free pass, he didn't stop it from happening. For sure he would have known about it.


Why is it wrong to keep tabs on other countries?

As Iridium said, this isn't a trustworthy nation such as UK or NZ, this is Indonesia.
Edited
9 Years Ago by 433
batfink
batfink
Legend
Legend (10K reputation)Legend (10K reputation)Legend (10K reputation)Legend (10K reputation)Legend (10K reputation)Legend (10K reputation)Legend (10K reputation)Legend (10K reputation)Legend (10K reputation)Legend (10K reputation)Legend (10K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 9.9K, Visits: 0
afromanGT wrote:
batfink wrote:
afromanGT wrote:
mcjules wrote:
afromanGT wrote:
Quote:
With enough strands of pure copper, insulation and enough electricity you can have as much bandwidth as you like. I'm sure what the point of this argument is?

Untrue. Light travels faster than electrical current.

That doesn't explain how it's untrue, just that fibre optics are more efficient. No argument from me there.

It's not a case of simply adding more wires, there's only so fast a copper wire can transport a signal. And it's significantly slower than fibreoptics.


there are two main ratings of Fibre an copper, there is the bandwidth measured in hertz and the speed which is measured in bits, here are some of the basic specs

I could be mistaken but isn't it the other way around? Bandwidth is measured in bits and speed is indicated in hertz - hertz being the number of wave cycles completed in a second.

Point is, you can't simply keep adding copper wires and expecting it to go faster, it has a limited capacity in the physical conductivity of the copper comparative to the capacity of the fibre optics. Copper's conductivity is roughly 66% comparative to the speed of light - or fibre optic exchange (roughly 3.0x10^9 m/s)


there is no doubt fibre is faster, quite simple.

i am not against fibre, i am just pointing out there ARE copper cables capable of delivering 1 gig over distance...

that's all....over and out

Edited
9 Years Ago by batfink
batfink
batfink
Legend
Legend (10K reputation)Legend (10K reputation)Legend (10K reputation)Legend (10K reputation)Legend (10K reputation)Legend (10K reputation)Legend (10K reputation)Legend (10K reputation)Legend (10K reputation)Legend (10K reputation)Legend (10K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 9.9K, Visits: 0
macktheknife wrote:
Intelligence & Diplomatic matters are handled on a bi-partisan basis without national politics being brought into it.



yeah like keating calling the Malaysian prime minister recalcitrant.....;) ;)
Edited
9 Years Ago by batfink
GO


Select a Forum....























Inside Sport


Search