The Australian Politics thread: Prime Minister Anthony Albanese


The Australian Politics thread: Prime Minister Anthony Albanese

Author
Message
afromanGT
afromanGT
Legend
Legend (77K reputation)Legend (77K reputation)Legend (77K reputation)Legend (77K reputation)Legend (77K reputation)Legend (77K reputation)Legend (77K reputation)Legend (77K reputation)Legend (77K reputation)Legend (77K reputation)Legend (77K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 77K, Visits: 0
ricecrackers wrote:
General Ashnak wrote:
ricecrackers wrote:
General Ashnak wrote:
ricecrackers wrote:
lefties should be applauding such a green initiative, but they'll still complain because they're supposed to hate the liberal party

How is it a green measure? Please explain what this is going to do to reduce our dependency on organic chemical compounds to solve our energy requirements? Is it somehow going to magically result in affordable and efficient alternative fuel technologies to spontaneously coagulate into the market? Is it going to be used to directly fund the alternative energy industry in any way? Or is it going to go straight into general revenue?


might force more people onto public transport you dope :roll:
the same way that car parking hikes achieve it

Edited by ricecrackers: 9/5/2014 12:13:56 AM

Going to try and provide evidence or does that go against your code of stupidity?


you live in a town of 1 carriage trains
i think there's room to move without breaking the bank, by um... adding an extra carriage :idea:

So that's a no.
Edited
9 Years Ago by afromanGT
ricecrackers
ricecrackers
Pro
Pro (3.5K reputation)Pro (3.5K reputation)Pro (3.5K reputation)Pro (3.5K reputation)Pro (3.5K reputation)Pro (3.5K reputation)Pro (3.5K reputation)Pro (3.5K reputation)Pro (3.5K reputation)Pro (3.5K reputation)Pro (3.5K reputation)

Group: Banned Members
Posts: 3.5K, Visits: 0
leave it to good old afrodope to miss the point :lol:
Edited
9 Years Ago by ricecrackers
ricecrackers
ricecrackers
Pro
Pro (3.5K reputation)Pro (3.5K reputation)Pro (3.5K reputation)Pro (3.5K reputation)Pro (3.5K reputation)Pro (3.5K reputation)Pro (3.5K reputation)Pro (3.5K reputation)Pro (3.5K reputation)Pro (3.5K reputation)Pro (3.5K reputation)

Group: Banned Members
Posts: 3.5K, Visits: 0
economy of scale seems lost on a few here :lol:
good grief

confused lefties dont know which way to turn when Tony beats them to the punch
Edited
9 Years Ago by ricecrackers
afromanGT
afromanGT
Legend
Legend (77K reputation)Legend (77K reputation)Legend (77K reputation)Legend (77K reputation)Legend (77K reputation)Legend (77K reputation)Legend (77K reputation)Legend (77K reputation)Legend (77K reputation)Legend (77K reputation)Legend (77K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 77K, Visits: 0
ricecrackers wrote:
leave it to good old afrodope to miss the point :lol:

What point? You had no point. You claimed that raising gas prices would force people on to public transport. You were asked to provide evidence of that claim. You didn't.
Edited
9 Years Ago by afromanGT
ricecrackers
ricecrackers
Pro
Pro (3.5K reputation)Pro (3.5K reputation)Pro (3.5K reputation)Pro (3.5K reputation)Pro (3.5K reputation)Pro (3.5K reputation)Pro (3.5K reputation)Pro (3.5K reputation)Pro (3.5K reputation)Pro (3.5K reputation)Pro (3.5K reputation)

Group: Banned Members
Posts: 3.5K, Visits: 0
afromanGT wrote:
ricecrackers wrote:
leave it to good old afrodope to miss the point :lol:

What point? You had no point. You claimed that raising gas prices would force people on to public transport. You were asked to provide evidence of that claim. You didn't.


you want me to prove economies of scale? :lol:
go to bed you dope
Edited
9 Years Ago by ricecrackers
afromanGT
afromanGT
Legend
Legend (77K reputation)Legend (77K reputation)Legend (77K reputation)Legend (77K reputation)Legend (77K reputation)Legend (77K reputation)Legend (77K reputation)Legend (77K reputation)Legend (77K reputation)Legend (77K reputation)Legend (77K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 77K, Visits: 0
ricecrackers wrote:
afromanGT wrote:
ricecrackers wrote:
leave it to good old afrodope to miss the point :lol:

What point? You had no point. You claimed that raising gas prices would force people on to public transport. You were asked to provide evidence of that claim. You didn't.


you want me to prove economies of scale? :lol:
go to bed you dope

I want you to provide evidence of a correlation between petrol price and public transport use.
Edited
9 Years Ago by afromanGT
paulbagzFC
paulbagzFC
Legend
Legend (45K reputation)Legend (45K reputation)Legend (45K reputation)Legend (45K reputation)Legend (45K reputation)Legend (45K reputation)Legend (45K reputation)Legend (45K reputation)Legend (45K reputation)Legend (45K reputation)Legend (45K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 44K, Visits: 0
ricecrackers wrote:
in summary, funny watching you lefties run around in circles. you dont even know what you stand for anymore other than "Tony Abbott bad, bad Abbott"
jokers


I'm interested to know what you're classing as Lefties lol.

Also, are you Viper in disguise?

Haven't seen a Blythe multi this good in a while.

-PB

https://i.imgur.com/batge7K.jpg

Edited
9 Years Ago by paulbagzFC
BETHFC
BETHFC
World Class
World Class (8.2K reputation)World Class (8.2K reputation)World Class (8.2K reputation)World Class (8.2K reputation)World Class (8.2K reputation)World Class (8.2K reputation)World Class (8.2K reputation)World Class (8.2K reputation)World Class (8.2K reputation)World Class (8.2K reputation)World Class (8.2K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 8.2K, Visits: 0
mcjules wrote:
benelsmore wrote:
mcjules wrote:
ricecrackers wrote:
mcjules wrote:
ricecrackers wrote:
lefties should be applauding such a green initiative, but they'll still complain because they're supposed to hate the liberal party

Are they doing it as a green measure?



does it make a difference when the result is the same?
just proves you people are all style over substance

Edited by ricecrackers: 8/5/2014 04:26:35 PM

The result isn't the same though. A price on carbon has the potential to reduce carbon emissions far more than an increase to the petrol excise.


A price on carbon also hurts a lot of logistical systems nationwide. In such a big nation, logistics is the key to our survival.

I was never a fan of a carbon price. I'd support taxing fuel higher if and only if the revenues were directly used for renewable research. Currently, the carbon price goes to the generic pool of money which makes it a complete wrought.

The whole point of the carbon price is it's supposed to hurt, it's supposed to encourage everyone to look at ways to reduce emissions.

I haven't found any information about how it goes into general revenue, do you remember where you read/heard that? I know a large chunk of the revenue disappears into the income tax cut they gave to lower income earners combined with additional subsidies to offset the pain for low income owners.

The whole thing isn't even fully implemented yet and I think some of the flaws of the current system would be fixed if the plan was allowed to be.


But thats the problem. In such a large country all it does it raise the cost of living. Higher fuel cost means a higher transport cost which means a higher end product cost. It just seems like a scheme to appease the greenies and to try and hurt high emitting companies. The problem with that being that high emissions cannot be avoided in many cases.

I heard the same that it went into income tax and the rest went into the general revenue pool. Can't remember where i heard it though.
Edited
9 Years Ago by BETHFC
BETHFC
BETHFC
World Class
World Class (8.2K reputation)World Class (8.2K reputation)World Class (8.2K reputation)World Class (8.2K reputation)World Class (8.2K reputation)World Class (8.2K reputation)World Class (8.2K reputation)World Class (8.2K reputation)World Class (8.2K reputation)World Class (8.2K reputation)World Class (8.2K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 8.2K, Visits: 0
afromanGT wrote:
ricecrackers wrote:
afromanGT wrote:
ricecrackers wrote:
leave it to good old afrodope to miss the point :lol:

What point? You had no point. You claimed that raising gas prices would force people on to public transport. You were asked to provide evidence of that claim. You didn't.


you want me to prove economies of scale? :lol:
go to bed you dope

I want you to provide evidence of a correlation between petrol price and public transport use.


A better and more accessible correlation in QLD would be that PT use remains the same because most people would rather drive and pay more than catch our horrific PT :lol:
Edited
9 Years Ago by BETHFC
mcjules
mcjules
World Class
World Class (8.5K reputation)World Class (8.5K reputation)World Class (8.5K reputation)World Class (8.5K reputation)World Class (8.5K reputation)World Class (8.5K reputation)World Class (8.5K reputation)World Class (8.5K reputation)World Class (8.5K reputation)World Class (8.5K reputation)World Class (8.5K reputation)

Group: Moderators
Posts: 8.4K, Visits: 0
notorganic wrote:
I used to think that only Afro was dumb enough to take ricecrackers pretty blatant bait.

You're better than this, mcjules.

It was late and I know he's trolling, but it's good practice for when you're talking to someone that actually matters :)

Insert Gertjan Verbeek gifs here

Edited
9 Years Ago by mcjules
Muz
Muz
Legend
Legend (16K reputation)Legend (16K reputation)Legend (16K reputation)Legend (16K reputation)Legend (16K reputation)Legend (16K reputation)Legend (16K reputation)Legend (16K reputation)Legend (16K reputation)Legend (16K reputation)Legend (16K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 15K, Visits: 0
General Ashnak wrote:
Munrubenmuz wrote:
General Ashnak wrote:
ricecrackers wrote:
lefties should be applauding such a green initiative, but they'll still complain because they're supposed to hate the liberal party

How is it a green measure? Please explain what this is going to do to reduce our dependency on organic chemical compounds to solve our energy requirements? Is it somehow going to magically result in affordable and efficient alternative fuel technologies to spontaneously coagulate into the market? Is it going to be used to directly fund the alternative energy industry in any way? Or is it going to go straight into general revenue?


Yes and no with regards to reducing dependency on fossil fuels for cars.

If hypothetically petrol hit $3 a litre tomorrow within a year we'd have far more fuel efficient cars running about.

Compare cars in Europe which are currently getting twice the fuel economy of those here.

There it's all about an fuel efficient, low emitting vehicle. Here it's all about more torque, more power blah blah.

In some ways a massive rise in petrol costs could be counter-intuitively a good thing.

https://www.hyundaiusa.com/tucsonfuelcell/

http://www.dailybreeze.com/environment-and-nature/20140414/toyota-honda-and-hyundai-investing-big-in-hydrogen-fuel-cell-powered-cars

These cars will all be imports into Australia, we won't be producing any (which I have no problem with). The vast majority of the cars that are on the road that contribute to the problem are owned by people who can't afford to purchase a new car. So how do you get these cars off the road? Or do you consign these people to the scrap heap? If someone has to make the choice between buying fuel for their car (at $3/litre that is $180 to fill most cars, twice what it is today) or buying food, clothing etc. Our public transport cannot cope with that sort of increase in demand, neither can it facilitate people getting to where they need to go. It would probably also kill the taxi industry, or at least make it a very unattractive business to get into with low margins, eliminating another form of transport.

Unless you are planning on providing every low income household with a new low emission car I can't see this as being anything other than very detrimental in general.

I appreciate that you actually have a point though :)


It was a hypothetical. Although what is not hypothetical is that fossil fuels are a finite resource and they WILL run out. It's not a matter of if but a matter of when. The thing is will it be hydrogen, electric, hybrid electric, hybrid compressed air or some other form that will take it's place. (If they can sort these batteries out it will be a game changer.)

The point is that currently there is no real economic driver for a hydrogen car setup at the moment because although petrol is expensive, it's not killer expensive yet to the point where people are considering change. For sure people whinge but to actually do something about it? Not yet.

Remember a few short years ago when petrol spiked? There was a huge demand for gas conversions of cars and the government even offered a $2k grant to do your own car. That's the sort of thing that will drive change.

The problem with hydrogen cars are that they are a chicken and egg thing. Should they build the refilling stations first or build the cars first. You can't have one without the other.

Yes the car would be expensive but that's only until scale of economies kick in. Look at the cost of a computer now compared to 10 years ago.

Change happens fast once tipping points are reached. There was no such thing as an iphone one minute and the next everybody had one. (Even though they're $600 + each.) It's incredible to think how ubiquitous smartphones have become and how little people think of having a dozen gadgets in their pocket rolled into one item.

Those cars will be expensive when they come out but within a few years they'll be on the second hand market and the trickle down will start.

We bought our car for $14k. Two and a half years after it sold for $38k off the shop floor. I've no doubt that change is coming with hydrogen cars. It'll start in a metro centre with a few service stations first and then as demand grows it's going to kick right off.

And then all those medieval $#%$s in the Middle East can go rot in hell.







Edited by munrubenmuz: 9/5/2014 08:55:50 AM


Member since 2008.


Edited
9 Years Ago by Munrubenmuz
rusty
rusty
World Class
World Class (6.2K reputation)World Class (6.2K reputation)World Class (6.2K reputation)World Class (6.2K reputation)World Class (6.2K reputation)World Class (6.2K reputation)World Class (6.2K reputation)World Class (6.2K reputation)World Class (6.2K reputation)World Class (6.2K reputation)World Class (6.2K reputation)

Group: Banned Members
Posts: 6.1K, Visits: 0
afromanGT wrote:
rusty wrote:
433 wrote:
rusty wrote:
I really can't fathom how America having a base in Darwin and Pine Gap negates our sovereignty. That's like claiming a neighbours TV antenna shadow across your lawn violates your property rights.

To be honest, it really just sounds like more trendy America bashing.\:d/


Just like America stationing troops here in WW2 negates our sovereignty... right?


That's right but opposing criminals smuggling thousands of illegal entrants across our borders is xenophobia.

I wonder if it'd be ok if US troops came here on dilapidated boats...


No the lefties wouldn't allow it because it would be a violation of our sovereignty.
Edited
9 Years Ago by rusty
rusty
rusty
World Class
World Class (6.2K reputation)World Class (6.2K reputation)World Class (6.2K reputation)World Class (6.2K reputation)World Class (6.2K reputation)World Class (6.2K reputation)World Class (6.2K reputation)World Class (6.2K reputation)World Class (6.2K reputation)World Class (6.2K reputation)World Class (6.2K reputation)

Group: Banned Members
Posts: 6.1K, Visits: 0
imonfourfourtwo wrote:
And state sanctioned smuggling back to Indonesia is sound policy?


It's a lot sounder than thousands of people drowning in the sea.
Edited
9 Years Ago by rusty
paulbagzFC
paulbagzFC
Legend
Legend (45K reputation)Legend (45K reputation)Legend (45K reputation)Legend (45K reputation)Legend (45K reputation)Legend (45K reputation)Legend (45K reputation)Legend (45K reputation)Legend (45K reputation)Legend (45K reputation)Legend (45K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 44K, Visits: 0
Time to start using terms like "Libertardian" and "Psycho Righties" etc.

-PB

https://i.imgur.com/batge7K.jpg

Edited
9 Years Ago by paulbagzFC
afromanGT
afromanGT
Legend
Legend (77K reputation)Legend (77K reputation)Legend (77K reputation)Legend (77K reputation)Legend (77K reputation)Legend (77K reputation)Legend (77K reputation)Legend (77K reputation)Legend (77K reputation)Legend (77K reputation)Legend (77K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 77K, Visits: 0
rusty wrote:
imonfourfourtwo wrote:
And state sanctioned smuggling back to Indonesia is sound policy?


It's a lot sounder than thousands of people drowning in the sea.

So they can go back to indonesia and try again...and drown at sea.
Edited
9 Years Ago by afromanGT
Muz
Muz
Legend
Legend (16K reputation)Legend (16K reputation)Legend (16K reputation)Legend (16K reputation)Legend (16K reputation)Legend (16K reputation)Legend (16K reputation)Legend (16K reputation)Legend (16K reputation)Legend (16K reputation)Legend (16K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 15K, Visits: 0
afromanGT wrote:
rusty wrote:
imonfourfourtwo wrote:
And state sanctioned smuggling back to Indonesia is sound policy?


It's a lot sounder than thousands of people drowning in the sea.

So they can go back to indonesia and try again...and drown at sea.


To be honest, whilst I don't like this policy, I do like the fact that they have called Indonesia bluff on this.

Under Labour it was "nothing can be done", "it's an insult to Indonesia etc etc".

Seems something could be done after all.



Edited by munrubenmuz: 9/5/2014 10:04:21 AM


Member since 2008.


Edited
9 Years Ago by Munrubenmuz
rusty
rusty
World Class
World Class (6.2K reputation)World Class (6.2K reputation)World Class (6.2K reputation)World Class (6.2K reputation)World Class (6.2K reputation)World Class (6.2K reputation)World Class (6.2K reputation)World Class (6.2K reputation)World Class (6.2K reputation)World Class (6.2K reputation)World Class (6.2K reputation)

Group: Banned Members
Posts: 6.1K, Visits: 0
afromanGT wrote:
So they can go back to indonesia and try again...and drown at sea.


Oh really how many confirmed deaths at sea do we have since the coalition took over government?
Edited
9 Years Ago by rusty
rusty
rusty
World Class
World Class (6.2K reputation)World Class (6.2K reputation)World Class (6.2K reputation)World Class (6.2K reputation)World Class (6.2K reputation)World Class (6.2K reputation)World Class (6.2K reputation)World Class (6.2K reputation)World Class (6.2K reputation)World Class (6.2K reputation)World Class (6.2K reputation)

Group: Banned Members
Posts: 6.1K, Visits: 0
Munrubenmuz wrote:
afromanGT wrote:
rusty wrote:
imonfourfourtwo wrote:
And state sanctioned smuggling back to Indonesia is sound policy?


It's a lot sounder than thousands of people drowning in the sea.

So they can go back to indonesia and try again...and drown at sea.


To be honest, whilst I don't like this policy, I do like the fact that they have called Indonesia bluff on this.

Under Labour it was "nothing can be done", "it's an insult to Indonesia etc etc".

Seems something could be done after all.



Edited by munrubenmuz: 9/5/2014 10:04:21 AM


I don't think anyone likes the policy, there is just no rosy milk and cookies sunshine and rainbows the left want. They tried the "compassionate" route when Labor government dismantled the pacific solution but that only causing thousands of people to be locked up in detention centers, damaged our Navy fleet and death and misery for thousands of drowned asylum seekers and their devastated families. We didn't have nationwide vigils for those poor folk though, I guess everyone was saving their crocodile tears for that one Iranian dude.
Edited
9 Years Ago by rusty
Muz
Muz
Legend
Legend (16K reputation)Legend (16K reputation)Legend (16K reputation)Legend (16K reputation)Legend (16K reputation)Legend (16K reputation)Legend (16K reputation)Legend (16K reputation)Legend (16K reputation)Legend (16K reputation)Legend (16K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 15K, Visits: 0
rusty wrote:
Munrubenmuz wrote:
afromanGT wrote:
rusty wrote:
imonfourfourtwo wrote:
And state sanctioned smuggling back to Indonesia is sound policy?


It's a lot sounder than thousands of people drowning in the sea.

So they can go back to indonesia and try again...and drown at sea.


To be honest, whilst I don't like this policy, I do like the fact that they have called Indonesia bluff on this.

Under Labour it was "nothing can be done", "it's an insult to Indonesia etc etc".

Seems something could be done after all.



Edited by munrubenmuz: 9/5/2014 10:04:21 AM


I don't think anyone likes the policy, there is just no rosy milk and cookies sunshine and rainbows the left want. They tried the "compassionate" route when Labor government dismantled the pacific solution but that only causing thousands of people to be locked up in detention centers, damaged our Navy fleet and death and misery for thousands of drowned asylum seekers and their devastated families. We didn't have nationwide vigils for those poor folk though, I guess everyone was saving their crocodile tears for that one Iranian dude.


There's a lot about the whole boat people thing I don't like regards the Liberal and Labour positions but what shit me more than anything was this whole carry on was going on under Indonesia's nose and they did nothing about it.

As if you could have hundreds of refugees parked down at the Cooktown or Cairns wharves without anyone knowing anything about it. It's no surprise they're one of the most corrupt countries on earth.

"We don't have the boats to patrol the coastline", "we can't police the ports" blah blah.

Australia turns a couple of boats around and what's the first thing Indonesia does? Sends out a navy boat to patrol their maritime border. What!!! Hey, they had boats all along.

Funny that.



Edited by munrubenmuz: 9/5/2014 10:21:50 AM


Member since 2008.


Edited
9 Years Ago by Munrubenmuz
afromanGT
afromanGT
Legend
Legend (77K reputation)Legend (77K reputation)Legend (77K reputation)Legend (77K reputation)Legend (77K reputation)Legend (77K reputation)Legend (77K reputation)Legend (77K reputation)Legend (77K reputation)Legend (77K reputation)Legend (77K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 77K, Visits: 0
rusty wrote:
afromanGT wrote:
So they can go back to indonesia and try again...and drown at sea.


Oh really how many confirmed deaths at sea do we have since the coalition took over government?

Shroedinger's asylum seeker.
Edited
9 Years Ago by afromanGT
paulbagzFC
paulbagzFC
Legend
Legend (45K reputation)Legend (45K reputation)Legend (45K reputation)Legend (45K reputation)Legend (45K reputation)Legend (45K reputation)Legend (45K reputation)Legend (45K reputation)Legend (45K reputation)Legend (45K reputation)Legend (45K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 44K, Visits: 0
Tone wrote:
If there is a change of government, Australian families will be better off. Their weekly and fortnightly budgets will be under less pressure because the carbon tax will go and no-one's personal tax will go up and no-one's fortnightly pension or benefit will go down.


Looking forward to next Tuesday night.

-PB

https://i.imgur.com/batge7K.jpg

Edited
9 Years Ago by paulbagzFC
paulbagzFC
paulbagzFC
Legend
Legend (45K reputation)Legend (45K reputation)Legend (45K reputation)Legend (45K reputation)Legend (45K reputation)Legend (45K reputation)Legend (45K reputation)Legend (45K reputation)Legend (45K reputation)Legend (45K reputation)Legend (45K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 44K, Visits: 0
rusty wrote:
afromanGT wrote:
So they can go back to indonesia and try again...and drown at sea.


Oh really how many confirmed deaths at sea do we have since the coalition took over government?


Hard to say seeing as they don't divulge any information ;)

-PB

https://i.imgur.com/batge7K.jpg

Edited
9 Years Ago by paulbagzFC
rusty
rusty
World Class
World Class (6.2K reputation)World Class (6.2K reputation)World Class (6.2K reputation)World Class (6.2K reputation)World Class (6.2K reputation)World Class (6.2K reputation)World Class (6.2K reputation)World Class (6.2K reputation)World Class (6.2K reputation)World Class (6.2K reputation)World Class (6.2K reputation)

Group: Banned Members
Posts: 6.1K, Visits: 0
paulbagzFC wrote:
rusty wrote:
afromanGT wrote:
So they can go back to indonesia and try again...and drown at sea.


Oh really how many confirmed deaths at sea do we have since the coalition took over government?


Hard to say seeing as they don't divulge any information ;)

-PB


I guess its's because there's nothing to divulge ;)
Edited
9 Years Ago by rusty
ricecrackers
ricecrackers
Pro
Pro (3.5K reputation)Pro (3.5K reputation)Pro (3.5K reputation)Pro (3.5K reputation)Pro (3.5K reputation)Pro (3.5K reputation)Pro (3.5K reputation)Pro (3.5K reputation)Pro (3.5K reputation)Pro (3.5K reputation)Pro (3.5K reputation)

Group: Banned Members
Posts: 3.5K, Visits: 0
afromanGT wrote:
ricecrackers wrote:
afromanGT wrote:
ricecrackers wrote:
leave it to good old afrodope to miss the point :lol:

What point? You had no point. You claimed that raising gas prices would force people on to public transport. You were asked to provide evidence of that claim. You didn't.


you want me to prove economies of scale? :lol:
go to bed you dope

I want you to provide evidence of a correlation between petrol price and public transport use.


ever heard of buses?
Edited
9 Years Ago by ricecrackers
ricecrackers
ricecrackers
Pro
Pro (3.5K reputation)Pro (3.5K reputation)Pro (3.5K reputation)Pro (3.5K reputation)Pro (3.5K reputation)Pro (3.5K reputation)Pro (3.5K reputation)Pro (3.5K reputation)Pro (3.5K reputation)Pro (3.5K reputation)Pro (3.5K reputation)

Group: Banned Members
Posts: 3.5K, Visits: 0
benelsmore wrote:
afromanGT wrote:
ricecrackers wrote:
afromanGT wrote:
ricecrackers wrote:
leave it to good old afrodope to miss the point :lol:

What point? You had no point. You claimed that raising gas prices would force people on to public transport. You were asked to provide evidence of that claim. You didn't.


you want me to prove economies of scale? :lol:
go to bed you dope

I want you to provide evidence of a correlation between petrol price and public transport use.


A better and more accessible correlation in QLD would be that PT use remains the same because most people would rather drive and pay more than catch our horrific PT :lol:


then obviously then the fuel excise is a good thing because you can easily afford it
Edited
9 Years Ago by ricecrackers
ricecrackers
ricecrackers
Pro
Pro (3.5K reputation)Pro (3.5K reputation)Pro (3.5K reputation)Pro (3.5K reputation)Pro (3.5K reputation)Pro (3.5K reputation)Pro (3.5K reputation)Pro (3.5K reputation)Pro (3.5K reputation)Pro (3.5K reputation)Pro (3.5K reputation)

Group: Banned Members
Posts: 3.5K, Visits: 0
mcjules wrote:
notorganic wrote:
I used to think that only Afro was dumb enough to take ricecrackers pretty blatant bait.

You're better than this, mcjules.

It was late and I know he's trolling, but it's good practice for when you're talking to someone that actually matters :)


excuses :-({|=
Edited
9 Years Ago by ricecrackers
rusty
rusty
World Class
World Class (6.2K reputation)World Class (6.2K reputation)World Class (6.2K reputation)World Class (6.2K reputation)World Class (6.2K reputation)World Class (6.2K reputation)World Class (6.2K reputation)World Class (6.2K reputation)World Class (6.2K reputation)World Class (6.2K reputation)World Class (6.2K reputation)

Group: Banned Members
Posts: 6.1K, Visits: 0
afromanGT wrote:
rusty wrote:
afromanGT wrote:
So they can go back to indonesia and try again...and drown at sea.


Oh really how many confirmed deaths at sea do we have since the coalition took over government?

Shroedinger's asylum seeker.


What a weak cop out. You're obviously just too afraid to deal with the facts.
Edited
9 Years Ago by rusty
paulbagzFC
paulbagzFC
Legend
Legend (45K reputation)Legend (45K reputation)Legend (45K reputation)Legend (45K reputation)Legend (45K reputation)Legend (45K reputation)Legend (45K reputation)Legend (45K reputation)Legend (45K reputation)Legend (45K reputation)Legend (45K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 44K, Visits: 0
rusty wrote:
paulbagzFC wrote:
rusty wrote:
afromanGT wrote:
So they can go back to indonesia and try again...and drown at sea.


Oh really how many confirmed deaths at sea do we have since the coalition took over government?


Hard to say seeing as they don't divulge any information ;)

-PB


I guess its's because there's nothing to divulge ;)


Government Spokesperson wrote:
No comment.


-PB

https://i.imgur.com/batge7K.jpg

Edited
9 Years Ago by paulbagzFC
General Ashnak
General Ashnak
Legend
Legend (18K reputation)Legend (18K reputation)Legend (18K reputation)Legend (18K reputation)Legend (18K reputation)Legend (18K reputation)Legend (18K reputation)Legend (18K reputation)Legend (18K reputation)Legend (18K reputation)Legend (18K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 18K, Visits: 0
Munrubenmuz wrote:
It was a hypothetical. Although what is not hypothetical is that fossil fuels are a finite resource and they WILL run out. It's not a matter of if but a matter of when. The thing is will it be hydrogen, electric, hybrid electric, hybrid compressed air or some other form that will take it's place. (If they can sort these batteries out it will be a game changer.)

The point is that currently there is no real economic driver for a hydrogen car setup at the moment because although petrol is expensive, it's not killer expensive yet to the point where people are considering change. For sure people whinge but to actually do something about it? Not yet.

Remember a few short years ago when petrol spiked? There was a huge demand for gas conversions of cars and the government even offered a $2k grant to do your own car. That's the sort of thing that will drive change.

The problem with hydrogen cars are that they are a chicken and egg thing. Should they build the refilling stations first or build the cars first. You can't have one without the other.

Yes the car would be expensive but that's only until scale of economies kick in. Look at the cost of a computer now compared to 10 years ago.

Change happens fast once tipping points are reached. There was no such thing as an iphone one minute and the next everybody had one. (Even though they're $600 + each.) It's incredible to think how ubiquitous smartphones have become and how little people think of having a dozen gadgets in their pocket rolled into one item.

Those cars will be expensive when they come out but within a few years they'll be on the second hand market and the trickle down will start.

We bought our car for $14k. Two and a half years after it sold for $38k off the shop floor. I've no doubt that change is coming with hydrogen cars. It'll start in a metro centre with a few service stations first and then as demand grows it's going to kick right off.

And then all those medieval $#%$s in the Middle East can go rot in hell.

Edited by munrubenmuz: 9/5/2014 08:55:50 AM

I like your progression of thought, I'm not convinced that Australia is a good choice to start this change, our Asian neighbours and Europe have a much better chance of creating a successful economic driver to achieving these end since that's where the cars are made. But your argument is very convincing!

The thing about football - the important thing about football - is its not just about football.
- Sir Terry Pratchett in Unseen Academicals
For pro/rel in Australia across the entire pyramid, the removal of artificial impediments to the development of the game and its players.
On sabbatical Youth Coach and formerly part of The Cove FC

Edited
9 Years Ago by General Ashnak
ricecrackers
ricecrackers
Pro
Pro (3.5K reputation)Pro (3.5K reputation)Pro (3.5K reputation)Pro (3.5K reputation)Pro (3.5K reputation)Pro (3.5K reputation)Pro (3.5K reputation)Pro (3.5K reputation)Pro (3.5K reputation)Pro (3.5K reputation)Pro (3.5K reputation)

Group: Banned Members
Posts: 3.5K, Visits: 0
General Ashnak wrote:
Munrubenmuz wrote:
It was a hypothetical. Although what is not hypothetical is that fossil fuels are a finite resource and they WILL run out. It's not a matter of if but a matter of when. The thing is will it be hydrogen, electric, hybrid electric, hybrid compressed air or some other form that will take it's place. (If they can sort these batteries out it will be a game changer.)

The point is that currently there is no real economic driver for a hydrogen car setup at the moment because although petrol is expensive, it's not killer expensive yet to the point where people are considering change. For sure people whinge but to actually do something about it? Not yet.

Remember a few short years ago when petrol spiked? There was a huge demand for gas conversions of cars and the government even offered a $2k grant to do your own car. That's the sort of thing that will drive change.

The problem with hydrogen cars are that they are a chicken and egg thing. Should they build the refilling stations first or build the cars first. You can't have one without the other.

Yes the car would be expensive but that's only until scale of economies kick in. Look at the cost of a computer now compared to 10 years ago.

Change happens fast once tipping points are reached. There was no such thing as an iphone one minute and the next everybody had one. (Even though they're $600 + each.) It's incredible to think how ubiquitous smartphones have become and how little people think of having a dozen gadgets in their pocket rolled into one item.

Those cars will be expensive when they come out but within a few years they'll be on the second hand market and the trickle down will start.

We bought our car for $14k. Two and a half years after it sold for $38k off the shop floor. I've no doubt that change is coming with hydrogen cars. It'll start in a metro centre with a few service stations first and then as demand grows it's going to kick right off.

And then all those medieval $#%$s in the Middle East can go rot in hell.

Edited by munrubenmuz: 9/5/2014 08:55:50 AM

I like your progression of thought, I'm not convinced that Australia is a good choice to start this change, our Asian neighbours and Europe have a much better chance of creating a successful economic driver to achieving these end since that's where the cars are made. But your argument is very convincing!


ever heard of buses?
Edited
9 Years Ago by ricecrackers
GO


Select a Forum....























Inside Sport


Search