The Australian Politics thread: Prime Minister Anthony Albanese


The Australian Politics thread: Prime Minister Anthony Albanese

Author
Message
mcjules
mcjules
World Class
World Class (8.5K reputation)World Class (8.5K reputation)World Class (8.5K reputation)World Class (8.5K reputation)World Class (8.5K reputation)World Class (8.5K reputation)World Class (8.5K reputation)World Class (8.5K reputation)World Class (8.5K reputation)World Class (8.5K reputation)World Class (8.5K reputation)

Group: Moderators
Posts: 8.4K, Visits: 0
433 wrote:
I wish we had a libertarian-right wing party :(

Edited by 433: 14/5/2014 10:28:32 PM

That'd be the Liberal Democrats. Not my cup of tea tbh :lol:

Insert Gertjan Verbeek gifs here

Edited
9 Years Ago by mcjules
batfink
batfink
Legend
Legend (10K reputation)Legend (10K reputation)Legend (10K reputation)Legend (10K reputation)Legend (10K reputation)Legend (10K reputation)Legend (10K reputation)Legend (10K reputation)Legend (10K reputation)Legend (10K reputation)Legend (10K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 9.9K, Visits: 0
mcjules wrote:
batfink wrote:
Dr Stephen Kirchner at the Centre for Independent Studies has stated that, ‘Traditionally the purpose of the welfare state was poverty alleviation and helping people who can’t help themselves’, ‘whereas now we seem to have shifted more to an entitlement mentality where a lot of government expenditure is designed to make life easier for people who can actually take care of themselves.’

Would never have thought they would have that sort of position :lol:

For those who haven't heard of them before
Quote:
The Centre for Independent Studies (CIS) is an Australian libertarian think tank. It was founded in April 1976 by Executive Director Greg Lindsay. The CIS focuses on libertarian issues such as free market economics and reducing the size and scope of government. The CIS is endowed by donations, membership subscriptions and book and event sales.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Centre_for_Independent_Studies


Another one of these "think tanks" with cool official sounding names but with obvious agendas. Institute of Public Affairs being the well known one.




say what you like, it's a very accurate statement, especially after the figures released last week about how many income units are revenue neutral do to their welfare handouts off setting their tax liabilities......

so in short hi income earners are doing ALL the lifting......they pay the highest tax and are ineligible for any welfare payments,
so in Australia we are sending the signal that it's fine to aspire to mediocrity, and sit around and stick your hands out for handouts and an easy ride through life.....
Edited
9 Years Ago by batfink
mcjules
mcjules
World Class
World Class (8.5K reputation)World Class (8.5K reputation)World Class (8.5K reputation)World Class (8.5K reputation)World Class (8.5K reputation)World Class (8.5K reputation)World Class (8.5K reputation)World Class (8.5K reputation)World Class (8.5K reputation)World Class (8.5K reputation)World Class (8.5K reputation)

Group: Moderators
Posts: 8.4K, Visits: 0
batfink wrote:
so in short hi income earners are doing ALL the lifting......they pay the highest tax and are ineligible for any welfare payments,

Ok so 52% of "income units" ARE paying tax. Income units also include pensioners by the ABS definition. There's no doubt there are people (sorry income units) out there that could be contributing more to the economy and taxes that aren't because they have access to some form of middle class welfare (I wonder which government brought most of those in...) but the figures can't be as alarmist as what is being suggested in that unreferenced article...

Edited by mcjules: 15/5/2014 08:44:34 AM

Insert Gertjan Verbeek gifs here

Edited
9 Years Ago by mcjules
batfink
batfink
Legend
Legend (10K reputation)Legend (10K reputation)Legend (10K reputation)Legend (10K reputation)Legend (10K reputation)Legend (10K reputation)Legend (10K reputation)Legend (10K reputation)Legend (10K reputation)Legend (10K reputation)Legend (10K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 9.9K, Visits: 0
mcjules wrote:
batfink wrote:
so in short hi income earners are doing ALL the lifting......they pay the highest tax and are ineligible for any welfare payments,

Ok so 52% of "income units" ARE paying tax. Income units also include pensioners by the ABS definition. There's no doubt there are people (sorry income units) out there that could be contributing more to the economy and taxes that aren't because they have access to some form of middle class welfare (I wonder which government brought most of those in...) but the figures can't be as alarmist as what is being suggested in that unreferenced article...

Edited by mcjules: 15/5/2014 08:44:34 AM


in your humble opinion
Edited
9 Years Ago by batfink
batfink
batfink
Legend
Legend (10K reputation)Legend (10K reputation)Legend (10K reputation)Legend (10K reputation)Legend (10K reputation)Legend (10K reputation)Legend (10K reputation)Legend (10K reputation)Legend (10K reputation)Legend (10K reputation)Legend (10K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 9.9K, Visits: 0
mcjules wrote:
batfink wrote:
so in short hi income earners are doing ALL the lifting......they pay the highest tax and are ineligible for any welfare payments,

Ok so 52% of "income units" ARE paying tax. Income units also include pensioners by the ABS definition. There's no doubt there are people (sorry income units) out there that could be contributing more to the economy and taxes that aren't because they have access to some form of middle class welfare (I wonder which government brought most of those in...) but the figures can't be as alarmist as what is being suggested in that unreferenced article...

Edited by mcjules: 15/5/2014 08:44:34 AM



it's beyond me that someone like you thinks it quite alright and acceptable that 50% of income units don't contribute....
and when the system is obviously broken no one will make the changes required to fix it
Edited
9 Years Ago by batfink
notorganic
notorganic
Legend
Legend (21K reputation)Legend (21K reputation)Legend (21K reputation)Legend (21K reputation)Legend (21K reputation)Legend (21K reputation)Legend (21K reputation)Legend (21K reputation)Legend (21K reputation)Legend (21K reputation)Legend (21K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 21K, Visits: 0
http://www.theguardian.com/world/2014/may/14/budget-it-will-be-chaplains-not-secular-social-workers-at-schools

Quote:
Budget: it will be chaplains, not secular social workers, at schools
National school chaplaincy program given $245m in funding, despite cuts to future school spending

Schools will lose the option of appointing secular social workers under the national school chaplaincy program, for which the Abbott government has found an extra $245m in budget funding.

While flagging big cuts to future school spending growth, the Coalition's first budget earmarks the funding over five years to continue the chaplaincy scheme originally put into place by John Howard.

But the education minister, Christopher Pyne, confirmed he would axe an option put in place by the Labor government for schools to opt for non-religious student welfare worker as an alternative to a chaplain providing “pastoral care”.

“Counsellors and social workers in schools are really the responsibility of the states and territories,” Pyne told Guardian Australia on Wednesday.


The Australian Education Union – which has long argued funds for the chaplaincy program should be redirected – described Pyne's justification as “an extraordinary comment”.

“So where does the Australian constitution say that the federal government is responsible for school chaplains,” said the federal president, Angelo Gavrielatos.

Schools can access $20,000 a year to help engage school chaplains. The former Labor government supported and extended the program but funding was due to expire at the end of 2014.

The budget papers show 3,527 schools receive support for chaplaincy or student welfare services under the existing program. The Education Department said 623 schools had engaged a student welfare worker rather than a chaplain.

The number of schools to be supported under the revamped program is expected to drop to 2,900. Budget papers flag “simplified reporting and administrative requirements to allow funding recipients to better focus on delivering chaplain services”.

The Coalition says the extension of the program fulfils an election promise. Pyne said the chaplaincy program was successful and popular in the community.

But the opposition education spokeswoman, Kate Ellis, questioned the government's priorities given it would curb school funding increases from 2018 onwards, which she said would fail to keep pace with rising education costs.

Ellis said it was wrong for the government to direct funding only to chaplains who had a “direct link to organised religion”.

“In my view it was really important that Labor expanded the program and we could see that the people who were best equipped for the job could go into the schools where they were required,” she said.

Tony Abbott and the treasurer, Joe Hockey, have been pushing the message that state and territory governments must take greater responsibility for health and education.

Changes to hospitals and schools funding would save the federal government a total of $80bn by 2024-25, a budget overview document says.


Interesting. Essentially Pyne is saying here that it's the states responsibility to provide social welfare to children, but the federal governments responsibility to prosthelytise and indoctrinate children in a constitutionally illegal way.

Defend that one, ideologues.
Edited
9 Years Ago by notorganic
Muz
Muz
Legend
Legend (16K reputation)Legend (16K reputation)Legend (16K reputation)Legend (16K reputation)Legend (16K reputation)Legend (16K reputation)Legend (16K reputation)Legend (16K reputation)Legend (16K reputation)Legend (16K reputation)Legend (16K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 15K, Visits: 0
^^ Yes. I too would like to see someone defend this garbage.

Imagine the outrage if Islamist chaplains were being funded by the government or even just visiting schools to talk to kids. It'd be all over the news and A Current Affair and your peanuts on talk back radio would be going off.


Member since 2008.


Edited
9 Years Ago by Munrubenmuz
Muz
Muz
Legend
Legend (16K reputation)Legend (16K reputation)Legend (16K reputation)Legend (16K reputation)Legend (16K reputation)Legend (16K reputation)Legend (16K reputation)Legend (16K reputation)Legend (16K reputation)Legend (16K reputation)Legend (16K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 15K, Visits: 0
http://www.smh.com.au/federal-politics/grub-christopher-pyne-denies-dropping-cbomb-in-parliament-20140515-zrdm4.html

Maybe not but gee it sounds pretty close.


Member since 2008.


Edited
9 Years Ago by Munrubenmuz
notorganic
notorganic
Legend
Legend (21K reputation)Legend (21K reputation)Legend (21K reputation)Legend (21K reputation)Legend (21K reputation)Legend (21K reputation)Legend (21K reputation)Legend (21K reputation)Legend (21K reputation)Legend (21K reputation)Legend (21K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 21K, Visits: 0
Sounded like "dud" to me.
Edited
9 Years Ago by notorganic
DB-PGFC
DB-PGFC
Amateur
Amateur (507 reputation)Amateur (507 reputation)Amateur (507 reputation)Amateur (507 reputation)Amateur (507 reputation)Amateur (507 reputation)Amateur (507 reputation)Amateur (507 reputation)Amateur (507 reputation)Amateur (507 reputation)Amateur (507 reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 499, Visits: 0
Sounds like he went to say cunt and then quickly morphed it into grub.
Edited
9 Years Ago by DB-PGFC
Muz
Muz
Legend
Legend (16K reputation)Legend (16K reputation)Legend (16K reputation)Legend (16K reputation)Legend (16K reputation)Legend (16K reputation)Legend (16K reputation)Legend (16K reputation)Legend (16K reputation)Legend (16K reputation)Legend (16K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 15K, Visits: 0
notorganic wrote:
Sounded like "dud" to me.


It sounds like whatever he says ends in a 'T'.

'T' and 'D' are 2 different sounds. No one reacts though which is telling.

His mouth doesn't make the shape you would for a D sound at the end.

Lots of comments here with multiple sources of the video including parliament after some clown alleged the video was doctored. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-zyMGOgpeV0



Edited by munrubenmuz: 15/5/2014 05:04:34 PM


Member since 2008.


Edited
9 Years Ago by Munrubenmuz
humbert
humbert
Semi-Pro
Semi-Pro (1.7K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.7K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.7K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.7K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.7K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.7K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.7K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.7K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.7K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.7K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.7K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 1.6K, Visits: 0
More money for the kid fiddlers and god botherers. What a shit country we live in.
Edited
9 Years Ago by humbert
mcjules
mcjules
World Class
World Class (8.5K reputation)World Class (8.5K reputation)World Class (8.5K reputation)World Class (8.5K reputation)World Class (8.5K reputation)World Class (8.5K reputation)World Class (8.5K reputation)World Class (8.5K reputation)World Class (8.5K reputation)World Class (8.5K reputation)World Class (8.5K reputation)

Group: Moderators
Posts: 8.4K, Visits: 0
batfink wrote:
mcjules wrote:
batfink wrote:
so in short hi income earners are doing ALL the lifting......they pay the highest tax and are ineligible for any welfare payments,

Ok so 52% of "income units" ARE paying tax. Income units also include pensioners by the ABS definition. There's no doubt there are people (sorry income units) out there that could be contributing more to the economy and taxes that aren't because they have access to some form of middle class welfare (I wonder which government brought most of those in...) but the figures can't be as alarmist as what is being suggested in that unreferenced article...

Edited by mcjules: 15/5/2014 08:44:34 AM



it's beyond me that someone like you thinks it quite alright and acceptable that 50% of income units don't contribute....
and when the system is obviously broken no one will make the changes required to fix it

What does that 48% consist of? The article mentions single parent households and pensioners as big benefactors. I don't have a problem with either of those.

I'm against a lot of the middle class welfare that the Liberal party introduced to win votes during the Howard era. So I agree there are some people that are getting money they don't need. Just pointing out that 48% is alarmist.

Insert Gertjan Verbeek gifs here

Edited
9 Years Ago by mcjules
paulbagzFC
paulbagzFC
Legend
Legend (45K reputation)Legend (45K reputation)Legend (45K reputation)Legend (45K reputation)Legend (45K reputation)Legend (45K reputation)Legend (45K reputation)Legend (45K reputation)Legend (45K reputation)Legend (45K reputation)Legend (45K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 44K, Visits: 0
Even Howard criticized the budget :lol:

-PB

https://i.imgur.com/batge7K.jpg

Edited
9 Years Ago by paulbagzFC
imonfourfourtwo
imonfourfourtwo
Pro
Pro (2.9K reputation)Pro (2.9K reputation)Pro (2.9K reputation)Pro (2.9K reputation)Pro (2.9K reputation)Pro (2.9K reputation)Pro (2.9K reputation)Pro (2.9K reputation)Pro (2.9K reputation)Pro (2.9K reputation)Pro (2.9K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 2.9K, Visits: 0
paulbagzFC wrote:
Even Howard criticized the budget :lol:

-PB



I found it interesting that Kelly O'Dwyer said Costello was the greatest treasurer in Australian history only to go on and say he was wrong about the Deficit Tax.
Edited
9 Years Ago by imonfourfourtwo
BETHFC
BETHFC
World Class
World Class (8.2K reputation)World Class (8.2K reputation)World Class (8.2K reputation)World Class (8.2K reputation)World Class (8.2K reputation)World Class (8.2K reputation)World Class (8.2K reputation)World Class (8.2K reputation)World Class (8.2K reputation)World Class (8.2K reputation)World Class (8.2K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 8.2K, Visits: 0
While the budget has some serious issues the sense of entitlement people have in this country is shocking.

From the 32784519567129 Facebook debates I had yesterday the summary of arguments against the budget is: The government needs to give us more money.
Edited
9 Years Ago by BETHFC
rusty
rusty
World Class
World Class (6.2K reputation)World Class (6.2K reputation)World Class (6.2K reputation)World Class (6.2K reputation)World Class (6.2K reputation)World Class (6.2K reputation)World Class (6.2K reputation)World Class (6.2K reputation)World Class (6.2K reputation)World Class (6.2K reputation)World Class (6.2K reputation)

Group: Banned Members
Posts: 6.1K, Visits: 0
Typical populist drivel by Shorten in the budget reply speech. Nothing of substance to offer other ideological distorted vitriolic spew. No plan how to bring the budget back into balance just attack the cuts they created through their own economic incompetence while claiming heroic credit for their unaffordable, unsustainable welfare programs. Labor should go and run charities rather than pretending they are capable of running countries.
Edited
9 Years Ago by rusty
humbert
humbert
Semi-Pro
Semi-Pro (1.7K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.7K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.7K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.7K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.7K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.7K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.7K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.7K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.7K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.7K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.7K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 1.6K, Visits: 0
Gratifying to see that the Coalition have their priorities well in order.

Cut to education funding -> expansion school chaplaincy program.

Reminds me of this;

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PSo4zjTbokY
Edited
9 Years Ago by humbert
notorganic
notorganic
Legend
Legend (21K reputation)Legend (21K reputation)Legend (21K reputation)Legend (21K reputation)Legend (21K reputation)Legend (21K reputation)Legend (21K reputation)Legend (21K reputation)Legend (21K reputation)Legend (21K reputation)Legend (21K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 21K, Visits: 0
rusty wrote:
Typical populist drivel by Shorten in the budget reply speech. Nothing of substance to offer other ideological distorted vitriolic spew. No plan how to bring the budget back into balance just attack the cuts they created through their own economic incompetence while claiming heroic credit for their unaffordable, unsustainable welfare programs. Labor should go and run charities rather than pretending they are capable of running countries.


:lol:
Edited
9 Years Ago by notorganic
lukerobinho
lukerobinho
Legend
Legend (11K reputation)Legend (11K reputation)Legend (11K reputation)Legend (11K reputation)Legend (11K reputation)Legend (11K reputation)Legend (11K reputation)Legend (11K reputation)Legend (11K reputation)Legend (11K reputation)Legend (11K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 10K, Visits: 0
No solutions in how to pay back Australia's growing debt. Very disappointing Bill

Spending more than you earn makes no sense
Edited
9 Years Ago by lukerobinho
imonfourfourtwo
imonfourfourtwo
Pro
Pro (2.9K reputation)Pro (2.9K reputation)Pro (2.9K reputation)Pro (2.9K reputation)Pro (2.9K reputation)Pro (2.9K reputation)Pro (2.9K reputation)Pro (2.9K reputation)Pro (2.9K reputation)Pro (2.9K reputation)Pro (2.9K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 2.9K, Visits: 0
lukerobinho wrote:
No solutions in how to pay back Australia's growing debt. Very disappointing Bill

Spending more than you earn makes no sense



Edited
9 Years Ago by imonfourfourtwo
rusty
rusty
World Class
World Class (6.2K reputation)World Class (6.2K reputation)World Class (6.2K reputation)World Class (6.2K reputation)World Class (6.2K reputation)World Class (6.2K reputation)World Class (6.2K reputation)World Class (6.2K reputation)World Class (6.2K reputation)World Class (6.2K reputation)World Class (6.2K reputation)

Group: Banned Members
Posts: 6.1K, Visits: 0
imonfourfourtwo wrote:
lukerobinho wrote:
No solutions in how to pay back Australia's growing debt. Very disappointing Bill

Spending more than you earn makes no sense




"Run surpluses when times are good, so that debt may be kept in check in difficult times " -- John Meynard Keynes

Even Wayne Swann believed in budget surpluses, and even tried to deliver one, and failed. The current opposition doesn't believe in anything, except their own rhetoric there is no debt problem and you can spend and borrow as much as you like with no plan to pay it back. Labors economic credibility was already low but tonight Shorten just smashed it to bits.


Edited
9 Years Ago by rusty
rusty
rusty
World Class
World Class (6.2K reputation)World Class (6.2K reputation)World Class (6.2K reputation)World Class (6.2K reputation)World Class (6.2K reputation)World Class (6.2K reputation)World Class (6.2K reputation)World Class (6.2K reputation)World Class (6.2K reputation)World Class (6.2K reputation)World Class (6.2K reputation)

Group: Banned Members
Posts: 6.1K, Visits: 0
notorganic wrote:
rusty wrote:
Typical populist drivel by Shorten in the budget reply speech. Nothing of substance to offer other ideological distorted vitriolic spew. No plan how to bring the budget back into balance just attack the cuts they created through their own economic incompetence while claiming heroic credit for their unaffordable, unsustainable welfare programs. Labor should go and run charities rather than pretending they are capable of running countries.


:lol:


That's how I felt during Bills speech.
Edited
9 Years Ago by rusty
SocaWho
SocaWho
World Class
World Class (9.7K reputation)World Class (9.7K reputation)World Class (9.7K reputation)World Class (9.7K reputation)World Class (9.7K reputation)World Class (9.7K reputation)World Class (9.7K reputation)World Class (9.7K reputation)World Class (9.7K reputation)World Class (9.7K reputation)World Class (9.7K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 9.3K, Visits: 0
As long the Coalition remind the voters that Shorten brought down 2 Prime Ministers, there will always be a trust issue.
Edited
9 Years Ago by SocaWho
SocaWho
SocaWho
World Class
World Class (9.7K reputation)World Class (9.7K reputation)World Class (9.7K reputation)World Class (9.7K reputation)World Class (9.7K reputation)World Class (9.7K reputation)World Class (9.7K reputation)World Class (9.7K reputation)World Class (9.7K reputation)World Class (9.7K reputation)World Class (9.7K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 9.3K, Visits: 0
rusty wrote:
imonfourfourtwo wrote:
lukerobinho wrote:
No solutions in how to pay back Australia's growing debt. Very disappointing Bill

Spending more than you earn makes no sense




"Run surpluses when times are good, so that debt may be kept in check in difficult times " -- John Meynard Keynes

Even Wayne Swann believed in budget surpluses, and even tried to deliver one, and failed. The current opposition doesn't believe in anything, except their own rhetoric there is no debt problem and you can spend and borrow as much as you like with no plan to pay it back. Labors economic credibility was already low but tonight Shorten just smashed it to bits.



Edited
9 Years Ago by SocaWho
Muz
Muz
Legend
Legend (16K reputation)Legend (16K reputation)Legend (16K reputation)Legend (16K reputation)Legend (16K reputation)Legend (16K reputation)Legend (16K reputation)Legend (16K reputation)Legend (16K reputation)Legend (16K reputation)Legend (16K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 15K, Visits: 0
Plenty of rent-a-crowd in the public gallery tonight.


Member since 2008.


Edited
9 Years Ago by Munrubenmuz
rusty
rusty
World Class
World Class (6.2K reputation)World Class (6.2K reputation)World Class (6.2K reputation)World Class (6.2K reputation)World Class (6.2K reputation)World Class (6.2K reputation)World Class (6.2K reputation)World Class (6.2K reputation)World Class (6.2K reputation)World Class (6.2K reputation)World Class (6.2K reputation)

Group: Banned Members
Posts: 6.1K, Visits: 0
Munrubenmuz wrote:
Plenty of rent-a-crowd in the public gallery tonight.


It was embarrassing, it's not a Q and A episode.
Edited
9 Years Ago by rusty
Lastbroadcast
Lastbroadcast
Semi-Pro
Semi-Pro (1.6K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.6K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.6K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.6K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.6K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.6K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.6K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.6K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.6K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.6K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.6K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 1.6K, Visits: 0
rusty wrote:
Typical populist drivel by Shorten in the budget reply speech. Nothing of substance to offer other ideological distorted vitriolic spew. No plan how to bring the budget back into balance just attack the cuts they created through their own economic incompetence while claiming heroic credit for their unaffordable, unsustainable welfare programs. Labor should go and run charities rather than pretending they are capable of running countries.


The liberals doubled the deficit in 9 months, then lumped the most ideologically extreme budget on working class Australians in 30 years.

Bill Shorten is absolutely right to tell these guys to get fucked.
Edited
9 Years Ago by Lastbroadcast
rusty
rusty
World Class
World Class (6.2K reputation)World Class (6.2K reputation)World Class (6.2K reputation)World Class (6.2K reputation)World Class (6.2K reputation)World Class (6.2K reputation)World Class (6.2K reputation)World Class (6.2K reputation)World Class (6.2K reputation)World Class (6.2K reputation)World Class (6.2K reputation)

Group: Banned Members
Posts: 6.1K, Visits: 0
Lastbroadcast wrote:
rusty wrote:
Typical populist drivel by Shorten in the budget reply speech. Nothing of substance to offer other ideological distorted vitriolic spew. No plan how to bring the budget back into balance just attack the cuts they created through their own economic incompetence while claiming heroic credit for their unaffordable, unsustainable welfare programs. Labor should go and run charities rather than pretending they are capable of running countries.


The liberals doubled the deficit in 9 months, then lumped the most ideologically extreme budget on working class Australians in 30 years.

Bill Shorten is absolutely right to tell these guys to get fucked.


Bill Shorten should tell his own party to get fucked. The $8.8 billon was was money given back to the reserve follows labor plundering coffers in a desperate pathetic attempt to manufacture a surplus, and even then they still couldn't do it. The rest was labors largesse and worthless fiscal predictions. What a bunch of clowns.
Edited
9 Years Ago by rusty
afromanGT
afromanGT
Legend
Legend (77K reputation)Legend (77K reputation)Legend (77K reputation)Legend (77K reputation)Legend (77K reputation)Legend (77K reputation)Legend (77K reputation)Legend (77K reputation)Legend (77K reputation)Legend (77K reputation)Legend (77K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 77K, Visits: 0
Cbf reading back through all the bullshit to see if this has been posted yet.

Edited
9 Years Ago by afromanGT
GO


Select a Forum....























Inside Sport


Search