so piss weak.....

I understand the definition of a caliphate, but I don't know the "full meaning" perversions that idiots have put on it, no.

A caliphate in the middle east would have about as much effect on your lifestyle as a kingdom popping up in South America.

http://www.sbs.com.au/news/article/2014/09/22/slipper-be-sentenced-fraud


who was it saying he wasn't guilty and it was all fabricated????

Lambie reminds me of a non-Evangelical, Australian version of Sarah Palin. Just a dumb, bigoted simpleton given a medium by a political party to spew stupid bullshit

She makes Hanson look good :lol:

-PB

are you suggesting BOTH of them voted PUP????

Hum well no, just that reading some of their posts are - well just as sad as listening to her :shock:

Don't think I've seen you post in this thread before but comparing notor and myself to Jackie Lambie...wow :lol:

Hum well no, just that reading some of their posts are - well just as sad as listening to her :shock:

I only like guys with big dicks, too.

"There will be no new taxes under a government I lead"

"There will be no new taxes under a government I lead"

[quote]Every road in Australia should have tolls, says report

EVERY road in the nation would be tolled with costs tied to what, where and when you drive, under a recommendation from a powerful review commissioned by the Federal Government.
The review of competition policy also argues for opening up industries such as taxis and pharmacies, removing restrictions on trading hours and deregulating power prices, as well as closing the gap between what Australians and the rest of the world pay for books, music and software.
But of all the recommendations in the 313-page report, the most controversial is the proposal for “cost-reflective pricing for roads”.
Review panel chairman, University of Melbourne economics professor Ian Harper, told News Corp Australia “we now have the capacity to charge people for their use of the road system according to time of day, size of the vehicle and whereabouts they happen to be”.
Professor Harper said “the road system is the only example of an infrastructure asset, where the government owns the great bulk of the asset, funded through the tax system and given away for nothing”.
If Singapore and London could direct-charge road users why couldn’t Australia, he asked.
“People should reconsider they already pay for the roads” through fuel excise and the time-cost of congestion.
“Sitting in queues of traffic is as costly … as paying,” Professor Harper said.
Australian Automobile Association executive director Andrew McKellar said “a road-user charging model … should be on the agenda over the medium-term”.
“But you’ve got to ensure that motorists don’t end up paying more.”
The recommendation wasn’t “about raising any more money”, Professor Harper said, because petrol taxes and other levies would fall to offset usage charges. It would, however, encourage motorists to change route, the time they travel, or to hop on public transport, he said.
Australian Competition and Consumer Commission chairman Rod Sims said: “Getting a more sensible road policy is good for consumers. We’ll have more and better roads.”
The minister responsible for competition matters, Bruce Billson, said some recommendations “may raise eyebrows”, although he wouldn’t comment specifically on the direct-charge proposal. Mr Billson, who commissioned the review, encouraged the public to give feedback.
Other review recommendations include increasing competition in industries such as taxis and pharmacies to give consumers more choice, as well as getting rid of “remaining restrictions on parallel imports” because it would lower prices.
Consumer group Choice said the recommendation would axe the “Australia tax” on movies, games, TV series, clothing and cosmetics.
Deregulating power prices — where it hadn’t been done already — would increase competition, the review panel argued.
Of trading hours, Professor Harper said businesses — not governments — should decide when stores are open. The only times where they may be a “social” case for imposing a close were Christmas, Good Friday and the morning of Anzac Day.
http://www.news.com.au/finance/money/every-road-in-australia-should-have-tolls-says-report/story-fnagkbpv-1227067053501

I'm all for political criticism but I guarantee that anyone who armchair criticizes both parties would do no better a job than they would regardless of their intelligence or qualifications. Unfortunately the political system is motivated by financial movement, not social progression

Furthermore apathetic voters

What are you implying

retaking oil fields? i am not living in fear, i am not certain where you got you information or if are of sound mind and mentally stable, but for this purpose of this argument i will assume you are, however difficult that may be......

ok so let's just say we let ISIS run rampage through the middle east and hard line militant extremists take control and start indoctrinating mass fruit loops to the sharia extremist islamic views, that will be the end of it , will it?? these extremists will just stay in their islamic stae?? they won't spread to Syria, Iran,Iraq,pakistan, Afghanistan or anywhere in the world???

[-o< another display of complete ignorance. You've really out done yourself. Read carefully you might learn something.

They can't even take Syria you think they would stand a chance against Pakistan or Iran's military?

And as to the oil fields. It's been well publicized in the media that [size=9]IS is selling oil. When you are at war the first thing you have to do is cut your enemies supply. So that is exactly what we are doing. [/size]Same reason we went there last time (hint it wasn't WMD), same reason we went to East Timor(natural gas).

Next time you dribble shit try and use facts or back up your argument with some points finky.

I'm all for political criticism but I guarantee that anyone who armchair criticizes both parties would do no better a job than they would regardless of their intelligence or qualifications.

Unfortunately the political system is motivated by financial movement, not social progression

Of course, but that's like saying football fans who criticise a coach wouldn't do a better job themselves.



That's kinda what I was implying - the people who control this country (certainly not the politicians) don't have the progression of society or our collective interests at heart. All these Left v. Right debates are nothing but a diversion.

When Aristotle outlined his ideal forms of government, the success of the political system depends on powers-that-be ruling by virtue rather than self-interest. An old-fashioned concept in 2014. :lol:

That's kinda what I was implying - the people who control this country (certainly not the politicians) don't have the progression of society or our collective interests at heart. All these Left v. Right debates are nothing but a diversion.

When Aristotle outlined his ideal forms of government, the success of the political system depends on powers-that-be ruling by virtue rather than self-interest. An old-fashioned concept in 2014. :lol:

I wonder how batfink thinks this massive raging horde/army is going to rock up in other countries and take them over :lol:

-PB

well here's the thing....i am not saying that.......

what i am saying is if left to do what they want and establish the state of hate, then we will have major problems.

Such as?

Such as?

what do you think Matt, once the state of hate is established, they will all join knitting classes and have tupperware parties??? all peace love and mung beans baby???