The Australian Politics thread: Prime Minister Anthony Albanese


The Australian Politics thread: Prime Minister Anthony Albanese

Author
Message
Scoll
Scoll
Semi-Pro
Semi-Pro (1.6K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.6K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.6K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.6K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.6K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.6K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.6K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.6K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.6K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.6K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.6K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 1.6K, Visits: 0
rusty wrote:
I would posit that workplace massacres, people heads getting hacked off, café sieges etc are a bigger threat than Abbott and Bolt warning people about the Islamist threat. Those are violent physical acts which result in blood being spilled and terrible loss of life, whereas Abbott and Bolt are merely uttering words. Mere words vs violent bloody actions? It’s akin to a burning house with children inside and bystanders saying the real threat isn’t the fire it’s the firefighters who are scaring the children with their loud sirens.

"Terrorists" don't spring fully-formed from the ether, they become radicalised through a combination of disenchantment, disadvantage and being isolated. Vilifying a minority group is a sure-fire way to tick all those boxes. Being Islamaphobic won't stop terrorists who happen to be Islamic from committing atrocities, but it will put many more impressionable people at risk of becoming those terrorists.

I also hope you are being tautological with the phrase "terrible loss of life", in the sense that any loss of life is a tragedy, because terrorism barely registers on the death toll list in the first world. Only 113 Australians have died globally from terrorism in the past 37 years. Terrorism is notoriously bad at large scale loss of life. This doesn't mean we should ignore terrorism, but we shouldn't whip ourselves into a paranoia over it any more than going for a dip at the beach. We have a very effective department working on preventing terrorism, and we are very good at stopping large scale attacks without the need to incite the public to vilify a race or religion. Some will always slip through, people will always get taken by sharks, but we don't need to distrust Muslims any more than we distrust gummy sharks.
Edited
9 Years Ago by Scoll
paulbagzFC
paulbagzFC
Legend
Legend (45K reputation)Legend (45K reputation)Legend (45K reputation)Legend (45K reputation)Legend (45K reputation)Legend (45K reputation)Legend (45K reputation)Legend (45K reputation)Legend (45K reputation)Legend (45K reputation)Legend (45K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 44K, Visits: 0
rusty wrote:
The Greens also want to raise corporate to tax to 33%, which would be amongst if not the highest in the world, while regionally and more broadly tax rates are trending downwards. They just don't have any business sense, that's why you rarely see Greens running successful corporations, normally they're in cushy ideologocial public service positions binging off the taxpayer with their grossly inflated salaries while taking pot shots at millionaires and billionaires for being "greedy". It definitely wouldn't stay at 33% either, as intellectual capital and entrepreneurs would take their skills and ideas elsewhere and revenue, the bulk of which the rich pay, would suffer so they would have to keep raising company and rich person tax to pay for their silly utopian welfare state.


Like you mean how big businesses hide profits off shore to avoid paying tax in Australia? :lol:

-PB

https://i.imgur.com/batge7K.jpg

Edited
9 Years Ago by paulbagzFC
Carlito
Carlito
Legend
Legend (28K reputation)Legend (28K reputation)Legend (28K reputation)Legend (28K reputation)Legend (28K reputation)Legend (28K reputation)Legend (28K reputation)Legend (28K reputation)Legend (28K reputation)Legend (28K reputation)Legend (28K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 28K, Visits: 0
change it to andrew bolt and this is how I feel about a certain poster
Edited
9 Years Ago by MvFCArsenal16.8
mcjules
mcjules
World Class
World Class (8.5K reputation)World Class (8.5K reputation)World Class (8.5K reputation)World Class (8.5K reputation)World Class (8.5K reputation)World Class (8.5K reputation)World Class (8.5K reputation)World Class (8.5K reputation)World Class (8.5K reputation)World Class (8.5K reputation)World Class (8.5K reputation)

Group: Moderators
Posts: 8.4K, Visits: 0

Albo for PM :lol:

Insert Gertjan Verbeek gifs here

Edited
9 Years Ago by mcjules
notorganic
notorganic
Legend
Legend (21K reputation)Legend (21K reputation)Legend (21K reputation)Legend (21K reputation)Legend (21K reputation)Legend (21K reputation)Legend (21K reputation)Legend (21K reputation)Legend (21K reputation)Legend (21K reputation)Legend (21K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 21K, Visits: 0
Bill Shorten is pretty awful, it's good to see a few new strong ALP faces starting to show up.

They will win my vote at the next election if they stand against data retention.
Edited
9 Years Ago by notorganic
u4486662
u4486662
World Class
World Class (8.8K reputation)World Class (8.8K reputation)World Class (8.8K reputation)World Class (8.8K reputation)World Class (8.8K reputation)World Class (8.8K reputation)World Class (8.8K reputation)World Class (8.8K reputation)World Class (8.8K reputation)World Class (8.8K reputation)World Class (8.8K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 8.8K, Visits: 0
notorganic wrote:
Bill Shorten is pretty awful, it's good to see a few new strong ALP faces starting to show up.

They will win my vote at the next election if they stand against data retention.

IMO, Labor look as weak as they always do. Shorten would last six months as prime minister. Albo is no good. Plibersek seems a bit soft and Tony Bourke is punchable.

The liberals are still just a bunch of selfish out of touch private school boy wankers. As per usual.

We need a strong democratic party again.
Edited
9 Years Ago by u4486662
notorganic
notorganic
Legend
Legend (21K reputation)Legend (21K reputation)Legend (21K reputation)Legend (21K reputation)Legend (21K reputation)Legend (21K reputation)Legend (21K reputation)Legend (21K reputation)Legend (21K reputation)Legend (21K reputation)Legend (21K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 21K, Visits: 0
Re: tax, I'd like to see a much lower income tax bracket offset by increased consumption taxes.
Edited
9 Years Ago by notorganic
notorganic
notorganic
Legend
Legend (21K reputation)Legend (21K reputation)Legend (21K reputation)Legend (21K reputation)Legend (21K reputation)Legend (21K reputation)Legend (21K reputation)Legend (21K reputation)Legend (21K reputation)Legend (21K reputation)Legend (21K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 21K, Visits: 0
u4486662 wrote:
notorganic wrote:
Bill Shorten is pretty awful, it's good to see a few new strong ALP faces starting to show up.

They will win my vote at the next election if they stand against data retention.

IMO, Labor look as weak as they always do. Shorten would last six months as prime minister. Albo is no good. Plibersek seems a bit soft and Tony Bourke is punchable.

The liberals are still just a bunch of selfish out of touch private school boy wankers. As per usual.

We need a strong democratic party again.

You're correct re: All of those. Jason Clarke is one to watch for the future.

My local MP is Andrew Giles, he took over from Harry Jenkins. Typical Labor, former organiser etc... But he seems to have a bit about him and he is doing a LOT of local work despite there being no election on the horizon. He also got thrown out of question time the other day. I respect and admire the work that he's doing so far, but he has a long way to go before I'll vote for him.
Edited
9 Years Ago by notorganic
damonzzzz
damonzzzz
Super Fan
Super Fan (160 reputation)Super Fan (160 reputation)Super Fan (160 reputation)Super Fan (160 reputation)Super Fan (160 reputation)Super Fan (160 reputation)Super Fan (160 reputation)Super Fan (160 reputation)Super Fan (160 reputation)Super Fan (160 reputation)Super Fan (160 reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 155, Visits: 0
notorganic wrote:
Re: tax, I'd like to see a much lower income tax bracket offset by increased consumption taxes.


But but the gst punishes the poor!!! /australia

But yeah New Zealand implement something similar recently and its working well. Going to take a brave leader who tries to implement that though.
Edited
9 Years Ago by damonzzzz
notorganic
notorganic
Legend
Legend (21K reputation)Legend (21K reputation)Legend (21K reputation)Legend (21K reputation)Legend (21K reputation)Legend (21K reputation)Legend (21K reputation)Legend (21K reputation)Legend (21K reputation)Legend (21K reputation)Legend (21K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 21K, Visits: 0
RedKat wrote:
notorganic wrote:
u4486662 wrote:
notorganic wrote:
Bill Shorten is pretty awful, it's good to see a few new strong ALP faces starting to show up.

They will win my vote at the next election if they stand against data retention.

IMO, Labor look as weak as they always do. Shorten would last six months as prime minister. Albo is no good. Plibersek seems a bit soft and Tony Bourke is punchable.

The liberals are still just a bunch of selfish out of touch private school boy wankers. As per usual.

We need a strong democratic party again.

You're correct re: All of those. Jason Clarke is one to watch for the future.

My local MP is Andrew Giles, he took over from Harry Jenkins. Typical Labor, former organiser etc... But he seems to have a bit about him and he is doing a LOT of local work despite there being no election on the horizon. He also got thrown out of question time the other day. I respect and admire the work that he's doing so far, but he has a long way to go before I'll vote for him.


Jason Clare?

Yeah, phone autocorrelation
Edited
9 Years Ago by notorganic
mcjules
mcjules
World Class
World Class (8.5K reputation)World Class (8.5K reputation)World Class (8.5K reputation)World Class (8.5K reputation)World Class (8.5K reputation)World Class (8.5K reputation)World Class (8.5K reputation)World Class (8.5K reputation)World Class (8.5K reputation)World Class (8.5K reputation)World Class (8.5K reputation)

Group: Moderators
Posts: 8.4K, Visits: 0
I did read some posts on reddit claiming to be responses from Bill Shorten and Tanya Plibersek regarding metadata retention saying (paraphrasing) that the need for law enforcement to be able to do their job needs to be balanced with people's right to privacy. Sounds promising but I'm extremely skeptical that they'll oppose it.

Insert Gertjan Verbeek gifs here

Edited
9 Years Ago by mcjules
notorganic
notorganic
Legend
Legend (21K reputation)Legend (21K reputation)Legend (21K reputation)Legend (21K reputation)Legend (21K reputation)Legend (21K reputation)Legend (21K reputation)Legend (21K reputation)Legend (21K reputation)Legend (21K reputation)Legend (21K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 21K, Visits: 0
Laws are already overreaching, although in specific regard to metadata, Law Enforcement already have access to whatever they want with a warrant.
Edited
9 Years Ago by notorganic
notorganic
notorganic
Legend
Legend (21K reputation)Legend (21K reputation)Legend (21K reputation)Legend (21K reputation)Legend (21K reputation)Legend (21K reputation)Legend (21K reputation)Legend (21K reputation)Legend (21K reputation)Legend (21K reputation)Legend (21K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 21K, Visits: 0
I do like the reddit mantra of "there is no such thing as metadata, all data is data"
Edited
9 Years Ago by notorganic
rusty
rusty
World Class
World Class (6.2K reputation)World Class (6.2K reputation)World Class (6.2K reputation)World Class (6.2K reputation)World Class (6.2K reputation)World Class (6.2K reputation)World Class (6.2K reputation)World Class (6.2K reputation)World Class (6.2K reputation)World Class (6.2K reputation)World Class (6.2K reputation)

Group: Banned Members
Posts: 6.1K, Visits: 0
Scoll wrote:
"Terrorists" don't spring fully-formed from the ether, they become radicalised through a combination of disenchantment, disadvantage and being isolated. Vilifying a minority group is a sure-fire way to tick all those boxes. Being Islamaphobic won't stop terrorists who happen to be Islamic from committing atrocities, but it will put many more impressionable people at risk of becoming those terrorists.

I also hope you are being tautological with the phrase "terrible loss of life", in the sense that any loss of life is a tragedy, because terrorism barely registers on the death toll list in the first world. Only 113 Australians have died globally from terrorism in the past 37 years. Terrorism is notoriously bad at large scale loss of life. This doesn't mean we should ignore terrorism, but we shouldn't whip ourselves into a paranoia over it any more than going for a dip at the beach. We have a very effective department working on preventing terrorism, and we are very good at stopping large scale attacks without the need to incite the public to vilify a race or religion. Some will always slip through, people will always get taken by sharks, but we don't need to distrust Muslims any more than we distrust gummy sharks.


I don't buy that government and our democratic, free, equal opportunity society are responsible for producing terrorists. Not everyone who is sad and lonely decide to become jihadis, there's clearly an indelible link between terrorism and Islamic doctrine and ideology. It doesn't matter how tolerant and kind we are with these people, just by being white, western, blonde, Christian, secular, democratic and equal we are the vile enemies of Islam and Allah, and they will do everything in their limited power to implement shariah, caliphate and their primitive value system, or destroy ours. So it's incumbent on our leaders to sound out the legitimate threat that fundamentalist Islam possesses and take reasonable action to protect it's citizens, rather than tip toeing around it fearing they cause some people to become upset. If someone is pushed over the edge because Tony Abbott says "Muslim leaders need to do more" you would have to reasonably conclude that person was 99.9% radicalised already. Far from vilifying the Islamic community the government has tried hard to differentiate moderate and radical Muslims, it's actually the imams and muftis themselves who've repudiated the government and requested not be treated distinctly from ISIS and their fundamentalist brothers.

As for comparing sharks and terrorism, sharks are rare attacks which affect only individuals and families, terrorism can potentially kill thousands and represent an ideological attack on our values which can inflict damage our national psyche and economy. We can't control whether a shark takes a surfer but we should try to control as much as possible stopping terrorist attacks for which the implications are far more severe.
Edited
9 Years Ago by rusty
notorganic
notorganic
Legend
Legend (21K reputation)Legend (21K reputation)Legend (21K reputation)Legend (21K reputation)Legend (21K reputation)Legend (21K reputation)Legend (21K reputation)Legend (21K reputation)Legend (21K reputation)Legend (21K reputation)Legend (21K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 21K, Visits: 0
http://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/2015/feb/26/gender-pay-gap-in-australia-rises-slightly-to-188-abs-data-show

Hey guys, the gender gap is up again. Any guesses why? Larissa Waters is sure it's because we hate women.

Oh look, an article from a few months ago.

http://www.abc.net.au/news/2014-12-16/increase-in-australian-birth-rate-for-first-time-in-five-years/5969900

I guess we should force all these new mothers back into full-time work in stressful, high-paying roles to keep pushing for that unicorn outcome equality number.
Edited
9 Years Ago by notorganic
mcjules
mcjules
World Class
World Class (8.5K reputation)World Class (8.5K reputation)World Class (8.5K reputation)World Class (8.5K reputation)World Class (8.5K reputation)World Class (8.5K reputation)World Class (8.5K reputation)World Class (8.5K reputation)World Class (8.5K reputation)World Class (8.5K reputation)World Class (8.5K reputation)

Group: Moderators
Posts: 8.4K, Visits: 0
Quote:
Despite this, Fairfax Media understands that the PJCIS, due to table its findings by mid-afternoon on Friday, has listened to some concerns from critics of the scheme and will recommend that:

* Agencies granted access to the data are specified in legislation rather than regulation (regulation can be altered by the attorney-general of the day without a parliament vote);
* Parties to civil court cases should be prevented from obtaining access to the data unless the bill's regulations allow it;
* If the data is stolen, telcos should be required to report the breach to customers and government;
* Data stored should be encrypted by telcos to prevent hackers from trawling through it if stolen.

http://www.smh.com.au/digital-life/consumer-security/george-brandis-metadata-power-should-be-weakened-powerful-intelligence-committee-recommends-20150226-13po5h.html


The fact that none of these items are already in the draft legislation is just more evidence of why this government is amongst the worst in our history.

Insert Gertjan Verbeek gifs here

Edited
9 Years Ago by mcjules
biscuitman1871
biscuitman1871
Pro
Pro (4.5K reputation)Pro (4.5K reputation)Pro (4.5K reputation)Pro (4.5K reputation)Pro (4.5K reputation)Pro (4.5K reputation)Pro (4.5K reputation)Pro (4.5K reputation)Pro (4.5K reputation)Pro (4.5K reputation)Pro (4.5K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 4.4K, Visits: 0
notorganic wrote:
http://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/2015/feb/26/gender-pay-gap-in-australia-rises-slightly-to-188-abs-data-show

Hey guys, the gender gap is up again. Any guesses why? Larissa Waters is sure it's because we hate women.

Oh look, an article from a few months ago.

http://www.abc.net.au/news/2014-12-16/increase-in-australian-birth-rate-for-first-time-in-five-years/5969900

I guess we should force all these new mothers back into full-time work in stressful, high-paying roles to keep pushing for that unicorn outcome equality number.


You have serious problems.

The figures are for full time employment so the amount of women working part time or casually do not skew the results.

The article is actually very balanced - "However, it is important to remember that the national gender pay gap is a high-level figure that shows general differences in earnings between women and men across the board. It is not a like-for-like analysis of women and men doing the same job and, therefore, it doesn’t mean that women are earning 18.8% less than men in the same role,” Harris said.

The only comments reported from the Greens Senator are that the watered water down gender and pay reporting requirements for businesses with more than 100 employees would have provided “important gender equality indicators”.


Image


Edited
9 Years Ago by biscuitman1871
u4486662
u4486662
World Class
World Class (8.8K reputation)World Class (8.8K reputation)World Class (8.8K reputation)World Class (8.8K reputation)World Class (8.8K reputation)World Class (8.8K reputation)World Class (8.8K reputation)World Class (8.8K reputation)World Class (8.8K reputation)World Class (8.8K reputation)World Class (8.8K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 8.8K, Visits: 0
biscuitman1871 wrote:
notorganic wrote:
http://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/2015/feb/26/gender-pay-gap-in-australia-rises-slightly-to-188-abs-data-show

Hey guys, the gender gap is up again. Any guesses why? Larissa Waters is sure it's because we hate women.

Oh look, an article from a few months ago.

http://www.abc.net.au/news/2014-12-16/increase-in-australian-birth-rate-for-first-time-in-five-years/5969900

I guess we should force all these new mothers back into full-time work in stressful, high-paying roles to keep pushing for that unicorn outcome equality number.


You have serious problems.

The figures are for full time employment so the amount of women working part time or casually do not skew the results.

The article is actually very balanced - "However, it is important to remember that the national gender pay gap is a high-level figure that shows general differences in earnings between women and men across the board. It is not a like-for-like analysis of women and men doing the same job and, therefore, it doesn’t mean that women are earning 18.8% less than men in the same role,” Harris said.

The only comments reported from the Greens Senator are that the watered water down gender and pay reporting requirements for businesses with more than 100 employees would have provided “important gender equality indicators”.

What it means is that women are either working fewer hours and/or working in roles that pay less. There are multiple reasons for this including cultural, maternity leave and almost certainly a bit of ingrained sexism in some industries. But the above statement is important because I get the feeling that some people think that women are paid at a reduced rate for the same job.
Edited
9 Years Ago by u4486662
mcjules
mcjules
World Class
World Class (8.5K reputation)World Class (8.5K reputation)World Class (8.5K reputation)World Class (8.5K reputation)World Class (8.5K reputation)World Class (8.5K reputation)World Class (8.5K reputation)World Class (8.5K reputation)World Class (8.5K reputation)World Class (8.5K reputation)World Class (8.5K reputation)

Group: Moderators
Posts: 8.4K, Visits: 0
u4486662 wrote:
biscuitman1871 wrote:
notorganic wrote:
http://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/2015/feb/26/gender-pay-gap-in-australia-rises-slightly-to-188-abs-data-show

Hey guys, the gender gap is up again. Any guesses why? Larissa Waters is sure it's because we hate women.

Oh look, an article from a few months ago.

http://www.abc.net.au/news/2014-12-16/increase-in-australian-birth-rate-for-first-time-in-five-years/5969900

I guess we should force all these new mothers back into full-time work in stressful, high-paying roles to keep pushing for that unicorn outcome equality number.


You have serious problems.

The figures are for full time employment so the amount of women working part time or casually do not skew the results.

The article is actually very balanced - "However, it is important to remember that the national gender pay gap is a high-level figure that shows general differences in earnings between women and men across the board. It is not a like-for-like analysis of women and men doing the same job and, therefore, it doesn’t mean that women are earning 18.8% less than men in the same role,” Harris said.

The only comments reported from the Greens Senator are that the watered water down gender and pay reporting requirements for businesses with more than 100 employees would have provided “important gender equality indicators”.

What it means is that women are either working fewer hours and/or working in roles that pay less. There are multiple reasons for this including cultural, maternity leave and almost certainly a bit of ingrained sexism in some industries. But the above statement is important because I get the feeling that some people think that women are paid at a reduced rate for the same job.

The argument on this always gets skewed by both sides as a sexism issue (which is definitely a component) whereas the real discussion should be on what's keeping women out of the workforce. I know from my personal experience, the cost of child care even with the rebate is pretty pricey. There's really no way my wife could go back to full time work for quite a long time. Saying that, we have also made a choice that we think 5 days a week is too much for a 3 year old despite the fact she loves going but others should have the option.

Insert Gertjan Verbeek gifs here

Edited
9 Years Ago by mcjules
notorganic
notorganic
Legend
Legend (21K reputation)Legend (21K reputation)Legend (21K reputation)Legend (21K reputation)Legend (21K reputation)Legend (21K reputation)Legend (21K reputation)Legend (21K reputation)Legend (21K reputation)Legend (21K reputation)Legend (21K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 21K, Visits: 0
http://www.smh.com.au/technology/web/metadata-retention-laws-will-pass-as-labor-folds-20150226-13qd4m.html

What a great way to turn ALP voters into Greens voters.
Edited
9 Years Ago by notorganic
mcjules
mcjules
World Class
World Class (8.5K reputation)World Class (8.5K reputation)World Class (8.5K reputation)World Class (8.5K reputation)World Class (8.5K reputation)World Class (8.5K reputation)World Class (8.5K reputation)World Class (8.5K reputation)World Class (8.5K reputation)World Class (8.5K reputation)World Class (8.5K reputation)

Group: Moderators
Posts: 8.4K, Visits: 0
notorganic wrote:
http://www.smh.com.au/technology/web/metadata-retention-laws-will-pass-as-labor-folds-20150226-13qd4m.html

What a great way to turn ALP voters into Greens voters.
I don't know how many left (no pun intended :lol:) would care. I assume many such as myself abandoned them when they started the race to the bottom regarding who can treat refugees the worst.

Insert Gertjan Verbeek gifs here

Edited
9 Years Ago by mcjules
notorganic
notorganic
Legend
Legend (21K reputation)Legend (21K reputation)Legend (21K reputation)Legend (21K reputation)Legend (21K reputation)Legend (21K reputation)Legend (21K reputation)Legend (21K reputation)Legend (21K reputation)Legend (21K reputation)Legend (21K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 21K, Visits: 0
I just did what I usually do and gave my local MP a spray... Although I haven't explicitly threatened him with losing my vote before.

Quote:
http://www.smh.com.au/technology/web/metadata-retention-laws-will-pass-as-labor-folds-20150226-13qd4m.html

Hi Andrew, no doubt you have heard and received the concerns of our community and Australians at large regarding the widesweeping data retention laws that the ALP has just agreed to wave through.

I feel like there is enough evidence out there already that data retention is expensive that ISPs will pass onto customers (iinet estimated $140 extra per customer per year), intrusive to the point that it was recently ruled unconstitutional in Germany, and having negligible effect on the ability for law enforcement to clear cases of crime.

I had hoped that the ALP would stand up for the right of Australian citizens to not be spied upon by their government without warrant - no matter how well intentioned the policy may be.

I deeply respect and admire the hard work you have been doing in our community, but unfortunately this is a deal breaker for me. I will be voting for a candidate that is willing to stand-up and be counted in representing their constituency against authoritarian and draconian programs, and will be loudly encouraging others within my local area to do the same.

Please do the right thing.


Probably could have been a bit tighter, I just bashed it out on my phone and sent it off without drafting or proofing.

Edited by Notorganic: 27/2/2015 02:52:20 PM
Edited
9 Years Ago by notorganic
rusty
rusty
World Class
World Class (6.2K reputation)World Class (6.2K reputation)World Class (6.2K reputation)World Class (6.2K reputation)World Class (6.2K reputation)World Class (6.2K reputation)World Class (6.2K reputation)World Class (6.2K reputation)World Class (6.2K reputation)World Class (6.2K reputation)World Class (6.2K reputation)

Group: Banned Members
Posts: 6.1K, Visits: 0
mcjules wrote:
notorganic wrote:
http://www.smh.com.au/technology/web/metadata-retention-laws-will-pass-as-labor-folds-20150226-13qd4m.html

What a great way to turn ALP voters into Greens voters.
I don't know how many left (no pun intended :lol:) would care. I assume many such as myself abandoned them when they started the race to the bottom regarding who can treat refugees the worst.


Yes it was terrible how they suddenly realised locking up thousands of kids and thousands dying in the ocean was a bad thing.
Edited
9 Years Ago by rusty
rusty
rusty
World Class
World Class (6.2K reputation)World Class (6.2K reputation)World Class (6.2K reputation)World Class (6.2K reputation)World Class (6.2K reputation)World Class (6.2K reputation)World Class (6.2K reputation)World Class (6.2K reputation)World Class (6.2K reputation)World Class (6.2K reputation)World Class (6.2K reputation)

Group: Banned Members
Posts: 6.1K, Visits: 0
We need to get back the glory days of our humanity when boats full of children were sinking and we were hoarding them in detention by the thousands. We've truly lost our moral compass releasing all those poor kids from detention and eradicating the deaths at sea.


Edited
9 Years Ago by rusty
notorganic
notorganic
Legend
Legend (21K reputation)Legend (21K reputation)Legend (21K reputation)Legend (21K reputation)Legend (21K reputation)Legend (21K reputation)Legend (21K reputation)Legend (21K reputation)Legend (21K reputation)Legend (21K reputation)Legend (21K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 21K, Visits: 0
mcjules wrote:
notorganic wrote:
http://www.smh.com.au/technology/web/metadata-retention-laws-will-pass-as-labor-folds-20150226-13qd4m.html

What a great way to turn ALP voters into Greens voters.
I don't know how many left (no pun intended :lol:) would care. I assume many such as myself abandoned them when they started the race to the bottom regarding who can treat refugees the worst.

Always had to gauge, but a lot of redditors flagging that this is their jumping off point.
Edited
9 Years Ago by notorganic
rusty
rusty
World Class
World Class (6.2K reputation)World Class (6.2K reputation)World Class (6.2K reputation)World Class (6.2K reputation)World Class (6.2K reputation)World Class (6.2K reputation)World Class (6.2K reputation)World Class (6.2K reputation)World Class (6.2K reputation)World Class (6.2K reputation)World Class (6.2K reputation)

Group: Banned Members
Posts: 6.1K, Visits: 0
notorganic wrote:
I just did what I usually do and gave my local MP a spray... Although I haven't explicitly threatened him with losing my vote before.

Quote:
http://www.smh.com.au/technology/web/metadata-retention-laws-will-pass-as-labor-folds-20150226-13qd4m.html

Hi Andrew, no doubt you have heard and received the concerns of our community and Australians at large regarding the widesweeping data retention laws that the ALP has just agreed to wave through.

I feel like there is enough evidence out there already that data retention is expensive that ISPs will pass onto customers (iinet estimated $140 extra per customer per year), intrusive to the point that it was recently ruled unconstitutional in Germany, and having negligible effect on the ability for law enforcement to clear cases of crime.

I had hoped that the ALP would stand up for the right of Australian citizens to not be spied upon by their government without warrant - no matter how well intentioned the policy may be.

I deeply respect and admire the hard work you have been doing in our community, but unfortunately this is a deal breaker for me. I will be voting for a candidate that is willing to stand-up and be counted in representing their constituency against authoritarian and draconian programs, and will be loudly encouraging others within my local area to do the same.

Please do the right thing.


Probably could have been a bit tighter, I just bashed it out on my phone and sent it off without drafting or proofing.

Edited by Notorganic: 27/2/2015 02:52:20 PM


You forgot to add the bit about satellites peering into your backyard and collecting data without warrants.
Edited
9 Years Ago by rusty
mcjules
mcjules
World Class
World Class (8.5K reputation)World Class (8.5K reputation)World Class (8.5K reputation)World Class (8.5K reputation)World Class (8.5K reputation)World Class (8.5K reputation)World Class (8.5K reputation)World Class (8.5K reputation)World Class (8.5K reputation)World Class (8.5K reputation)World Class (8.5K reputation)

Group: Moderators
Posts: 8.4K, Visits: 0
notorganic wrote:
I just did what I usually do and gave my local MP a spray... Although I haven't explicitly threatened him with losing my vote before.

Quote:
http://www.smh.com.au/technology/web/metadata-retention-laws-will-pass-as-labor-folds-20150226-13qd4m.html

Hi Andrew, no doubt you have heard and received the concerns of our community and Australians at large regarding the widesweeping data retention laws that the ALP has just agreed to wave through.

I feel like there is enough evidence out there already that data retention is expensive that ISPs will pass onto customers (iinet estimated $140 extra per customer per year), intrusive to the point that it was recently ruled unconstitutional in Germany, and having negligible effect on the ability for law enforcement to clear cases of crime.

I had hoped that the ALP would stand up for the right of Australian citizens to not be spied upon by their government without warrant - no matter how well intentioned the policy may be.

I deeply respect and admire the hard work you have been doing in our community, but unfortunately this is a deal breaker for me. I will be voting for a candidate that is willing to stand-up and be counted in representing their constituency against authoritarian and draconian programs, and will be loudly encouraging others within my local area to do the same.

Please do the right thing.


Probably could have been a bit tighter, I just bashed it out on my phone and sent it off without drafting or proofing.

Edited by Notorganic: 27/2/2015 02:52:20 PM

The problem is too many vote for the major parties as first preference or second preference, as they flow eventually you end up voting for either Labor or Liberal and we all know the logical choice between those two.

Insert Gertjan Verbeek gifs here

Edited
9 Years Ago by mcjules
rusty
rusty
World Class
World Class (6.2K reputation)World Class (6.2K reputation)World Class (6.2K reputation)World Class (6.2K reputation)World Class (6.2K reputation)World Class (6.2K reputation)World Class (6.2K reputation)World Class (6.2K reputation)World Class (6.2K reputation)World Class (6.2K reputation)World Class (6.2K reputation)

Group: Banned Members
Posts: 6.1K, Visits: 0
mcjules wrote:
notorganic wrote:
I just did what I usually do and gave my local MP a spray... Although I haven't explicitly threatened him with losing my vote before.

Quote:
http://www.smh.com.au/technology/web/metadata-retention-laws-will-pass-as-labor-folds-20150226-13qd4m.html

Hi Andrew, no doubt you have heard and received the concerns of our community and Australians at large regarding the widesweeping data retention laws that the ALP has just agreed to wave through.

I feel like there is enough evidence out there already that data retention is expensive that ISPs will pass onto customers (iinet estimated $140 extra per customer per year), intrusive to the point that it was recently ruled unconstitutional in Germany, and having negligible effect on the ability for law enforcement to clear cases of crime.

I had hoped that the ALP would stand up for the right of Australian citizens to not be spied upon by their government without warrant - no matter how well intentioned the policy may be.

I deeply respect and admire the hard work you have been doing in our community, but unfortunately this is a deal breaker for me. I will be voting for a candidate that is willing to stand-up and be counted in representing their constituency against authoritarian and draconian programs, and will be loudly encouraging others within my local area to do the same.

Please do the right thing.


Probably could have been a bit tighter, I just bashed it out on my phone and sent it off without drafting or proofing.

Edited by Notorganic: 27/2/2015 02:52:20 PM

The problem is too many vote for the major parties as first preference or second preference, as they flow eventually you end up voting for either Labor or Liberal and we all know the logical choice between those two.


Yes the party with a successful human rights record locking up thousands of children and allowing boats to sink killing those on board. The evil coalition have no conscience releasing thousands of children from detention and cutting out the deaths at sea.
Edited
9 Years Ago by rusty
notorganic
notorganic
Legend
Legend (21K reputation)Legend (21K reputation)Legend (21K reputation)Legend (21K reputation)Legend (21K reputation)Legend (21K reputation)Legend (21K reputation)Legend (21K reputation)Legend (21K reputation)Legend (21K reputation)Legend (21K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 21K, Visits: 0
mcjules wrote:
notorganic wrote:
I just did what I usually do and gave my local MP a spray... Although I haven't explicitly threatened him with losing my vote before.

Quote:
http://www.smh.com.au/technology/web/metadata-retention-laws-will-pass-as-labor-folds-20150226-13qd4m.html

Hi Andrew, no doubt you have heard and received the concerns of our community and Australians at large regarding the widesweeping data retention laws that the ALP has just agreed to wave through.

I feel like there is enough evidence out there already that data retention is expensive that ISPs will pass onto customers (iinet estimated $140 extra per customer per year), intrusive to the point that it was recently ruled unconstitutional in Germany, and having negligible effect on the ability for law enforcement to clear cases of crime.

I had hoped that the ALP would stand up for the right of Australian citizens to not be spied upon by their government without warrant - no matter how well intentioned the policy may be.

I deeply respect and admire the hard work you have been doing in our community, but unfortunately this is a deal breaker for me. I will be voting for a candidate that is willing to stand-up and be counted in representing their constituency against authoritarian and draconian programs, and will be loudly encouraging others within my local area to do the same.

Please do the right thing.


Probably could have been a bit tighter, I just bashed it out on my phone and sent it off without drafting or proofing.

Edited by Notorganic: 27/2/2015 02:52:20 PM

The problem is too many vote for the major parties as first preference or second preference, as they flow eventually you end up voting for either Labor or Liberal and we all know the logical choice between those two.

Sure, and Scullin is a very safe ALP seat, but the Green creep is happening more and more - especially in the inner city.

Looking forward to being as loud as possible :)
Edited
9 Years Ago by notorganic
mcjules
mcjules
World Class
World Class (8.5K reputation)World Class (8.5K reputation)World Class (8.5K reputation)World Class (8.5K reputation)World Class (8.5K reputation)World Class (8.5K reputation)World Class (8.5K reputation)World Class (8.5K reputation)World Class (8.5K reputation)World Class (8.5K reputation)World Class (8.5K reputation)

Group: Moderators
Posts: 8.4K, Visits: 0
notorganic wrote:
mcjules wrote:
notorganic wrote:
I just did what I usually do and gave my local MP a spray... Although I haven't explicitly threatened him with losing my vote before.

Quote:
http://www.smh.com.au/technology/web/metadata-retention-laws-will-pass-as-labor-folds-20150226-13qd4m.html

Hi Andrew, no doubt you have heard and received the concerns of our community and Australians at large regarding the widesweeping data retention laws that the ALP has just agreed to wave through.

I feel like there is enough evidence out there already that data retention is expensive that ISPs will pass onto customers (iinet estimated $140 extra per customer per year), intrusive to the point that it was recently ruled unconstitutional in Germany, and having negligible effect on the ability for law enforcement to clear cases of crime.

I had hoped that the ALP would stand up for the right of Australian citizens to not be spied upon by their government without warrant - no matter how well intentioned the policy may be.

I deeply respect and admire the hard work you have been doing in our community, but unfortunately this is a deal breaker for me. I will be voting for a candidate that is willing to stand-up and be counted in representing their constituency against authoritarian and draconian programs, and will be loudly encouraging others within my local area to do the same.

Please do the right thing.


Probably could have been a bit tighter, I just bashed it out on my phone and sent it off without drafting or proofing.

Edited by Notorganic: 27/2/2015 02:52:20 PM

The problem is too many vote for the major parties as first preference or second preference, as they flow eventually you end up voting for either Labor or Liberal and we all know the logical choice between those two.

Sure, and Scullin is a very safe ALP seat, but the Green creep is happening more and more - especially in the inner city.

Looking forward to being as loud as possible :)

Oh yeah if the Greens don't get their best result yet this coming election I'll be very surprised.

Insert Gertjan Verbeek gifs here

Edited
9 Years Ago by mcjules
GO


Select a Forum....























Inside Sport


Search