Carlito
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 28K,
Visits: 0
|
Surely this needs to be looked at. Way to concidental
|
|
|
|
Aikhme
|
|
Group: Banned Members
Posts: 2.4K,
Visits: 0
|
notorganic wrote: Go Palmer, Go! Clive has a chip on his shoulder because the LNP did him over! Thankfully! He is dreaming Turnbull will be putting this guy on a committee! I mean seriously! :lol:
|
|
|
elf.II
|
|
Group: Banned Members
Posts: 30,
Visits: 0
|
Aikhme wrote:Anyway, Sarah Handon-Young was in Adelaide today trying to convince the electorate that the Australian electorate wants to just open the floodgates and let in 50,000 refugees each year and abolish offshore detention and processing.
Firstly, where will the 50,000 be housed and what about all the services they need and how much will that cost?
Also, what about the other 50,000 that will follow illegally and those which will drown at sea?
We are already the third most generous country so it's not as if we are lagging behind!
Crazy! This is the Left fantasy - Help everyone at all costs. Europe is being savagely overrn but we have the possibility to isolate ourselves.
|
|
|
Aikhme
|
|
Group: Banned Members
Posts: 2.4K,
Visits: 0
|
elf.II wrote:Aikhme wrote:Anyway, Sarah Handon-Young was in Adelaide today trying to convince the electorate that the Australian electorate wants to just open the floodgates and let in 50,000 refugees each year and abolish offshore detention and processing.
Firstly, where will the 50,000 be housed and what about all the services they need and how much will that cost?
Also, what about the other 50,000 that will follow illegally and those which will drown at sea?
We are already the third most generous country so it's not as if we are lagging behind!
Crazy! This is the Left fantasy - Help everyone at all costs. Europe is being savagely overrn but we have the possibility to isolate ourselves. Don't I know it bro! Europe is being ravaged alright. It's not good.
|
|
|
Slobodan Drauposevic
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 14K,
Visits: 0
|
As someone who lives in Europe, the scare tactics you people bring out is laughable at best. Higher living standards and all. You're too quick to eat up Murdoch's propaganda shit sandwiches and it's honestly laughable.
|
|
|
Aikhme
|
|
Group: Banned Members
Posts: 2.4K,
Visits: 0
|
Draupnir wrote:As someone who lives in Europe, the scare tactics you people bring out is laughable at best. Higher living standards and all. You're too quick to eat up Murdoch's propaganda shit sandwiches and it's honestly laughable. They are not scare tactics. I dare you to go to Athens to see for yourself the catastrophe. Not just Athens, but Italy, Germany, France and Belgium too. Btw, I believe in the possibility of climate change and I think you will find that most Right Wingers, LNP voters and Murdoch MSM readers also do.
|
|
|
Murdoch Rags Ltd
|
|
Group: Banned Members
Posts: 1.2K,
Visits: 0
|
Game on! The key NewsPoll has Labor leading 51-49 Shorten continuing to close preferred PM gap Can Turnbull lose the unloseable election? :lol: :lol: :lol: http://resources.news.com.au/files/2016/05/22/1227877/679329-160523poll.pdfSo in summary, the latest polls are (Labor first listed as they are leading most polls): Morgan 52.5-47.5 Essential 51-49 NewsPoll 51-49 ReachTel 50-50 Galaxy 50-50 Ipsos 49-51
|
|
|
pv4
|
|
Group: Moderators
Posts: 12K,
Visits: 0
|
What went on mvfc vs aikhme last night was unacceptable.
Unless someone openly uses their real life details on this forum, it is not on to openly use peoples names on here or mention things you've noticed while creeping/stalking them elsewhere. Play the ball (the ball being things on this forum) and not the man.
Also, please calm down on the accusations you throw at people - in this case i'm referencing labelling people a multi. It doesn't help situations and as seen from last night, just escalates things.
|
|
|
paulbagzFC
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 44K,
Visits: 0
|
pv4 wrote:What went on mvfc vs aikhme last night was unacceptable.
Unless someone openly uses their real life details on this forum, it is not on to openly use peoples names on here or mention things you've noticed while creeping/stalking them elsewhere. Play the ball (the ball being things on this forum) and not the man.
Also, please calm down on the accusations you throw at people - in this case i'm referencing labelling people a multi. It doesn't help situations and as seen from last night, just escalates things. And yet we have elf.II appearing and posting straight in things like ET lol. I still don't know why people haven't got FB profiles heavily locked down in this modern age of wankers on the internet being dickbags to one another. -PB
|
|
|
Murdoch Rags Ltd
|
|
Group: Banned Members
Posts: 1.2K,
Visits: 0
|
|
|
|
canonical
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 494,
Visits: 0
|
The trend in leaders' satisfaction is the most interesting IMO. Leaders graph
|
|
|
rusty
|
|
Group: Banned Members
Posts: 6.1K,
Visits: 0
|
Draupnir wrote:As someone who lives in Europe, the scare tactics you people bring out is laughable at best. Higher living standards and all. You're too quick to eat up Murdoch's propaganda shit sandwiches and it's honestly laughable. Australia is ranked # 2 in terms of living standards, so you must be living in Norway?:lol: Which makes sense since they've slammed the door shut on refugees.:lol:
|
|
|
Murdoch Rags Ltd
|
|
Group: Banned Members
Posts: 1.2K,
Visits: 0
|
canonical wrote:The trend in leaders' satisfaction is the most interesting IMO. Leaders graph Yep stunning isn't it? Shorten is about to overtake Turnbull on net satisfaction rating At least some of the populace are waking up to the fact it's about substance (policies) not charisma
|
|
|
rusty
|
|
Group: Banned Members
Posts: 6.1K,
Visits: 0
|
Murdoch Rags Ltd wrote:So out of interest, what do forumites think of why the Libs chose a second rate NBN? I see it between 3 alternatives: 1) Purely as a marketing point of difference to Labor in 2010 2) To keep the internet slower for homes, so Murdoch's Foxtel cable tv would be more competitive against streaming services 3) To keep Telstra more relevant, to make up for its terrible valuation since its staged sale from 1997 & help the Libs 'save face' over its sale (its worth noting that the stage two sale in 1999 resulted in massive losses for buyers at $7.40/share, now under $4.00 in 1999 terms) 4) because its a fucking waste of of money no other government in the world is cocky and stupid enough to try
|
|
|
pv4
|
|
Group: Moderators
Posts: 12K,
Visits: 0
|
11.mvfc.11 wrote:pv4 wrote:What went on mvfc vs aikhme last night was unacceptable.
Unless someone openly uses their real life details on this forum, it is not on to openly use peoples names on here or mention things you've noticed while creeping/stalking them elsewhere. Play the ball (the ball being things on this forum) and not the man.
Also, please calm down on the accusations you throw at people - in this case i'm referencing labelling people a multi. It doesn't help situations and as seen from last night, just escalates things. Has JP received the same warning or thrown the toys out of the cot and started another multi already? I don't even recognise that username :lol: Feel free to PM me with any links and examples if this JP or others are in need of some moderating and I'll have a look at it.
|
|
|
rusty
|
|
Group: Banned Members
Posts: 6.1K,
Visits: 0
|
MvFCArsenal16.8 wrote:rusty wrote:MvFCArsenal16.8 wrote:rusty wrote:MvFCArsenal16.8 wrote:rusty wrote:MvFCArsenal16.8 wrote:mcjules wrote:rusty wrote:mcjules wrote:$50 billion dollar tax cut to businesses = has to be great! No evidence required $50 billion dollar investment in infrastructure = boo where's the business case? reckless government spending etc Most countries in Asia and the OECD are cutting company tax, and at the same time investing in a broad range of infrastructure not pork barreling it into one area to secure the legacy one of its ministers. Most countries in Asia and thve OECD have significantly better broadband :lol: If only Howard didn't sell off both the retail and wholesale networks (and to the same company no less). We've been suffering for years as a consequence. so much this. The phillipines has superfast internet and has had for roughly a decade or more. All due to the fwct the government knew when to actually build infrastructure for the future and not the past. Lol. Phillippines has the slowest internet in south east Asia and one of the slowest in Asia :lol: :lol: yeah nah How The Philippines Got Asia's Worst Internet Service http://www.forbes.com/sites/ralphjennings/2016/02/23/meet-asias-internet-laggard-the-philippines/#e67c28d717a4 :lol: yeah nah http://www.philstar.com/opinion/2016/03/31/1567862/reasons-why-our-internet-speeds-are-so-slowLIST: Philippines ranks 21st of 22 Asian countries in Internet download ... PH Internet 2nd slowest in Asia, one of the most expensive | Inquirer ... Average Philippine Internet speed 155th in world - Rappler In its household download index, Internet metrics provider Ookla found that the Philippines averaged a speed of just 3.64 megabits per second (Mbps), which ranked 176th out of 202 countries worldwide. Globally, the average broadband download speed is 23.3 Mbps, nearly eight times faster than the Philippines.May 19, 2015 LIST: Philippines ranks 21st of 22 Asian countries in Internet download ... www.gmanetwork.com/.../list-philippines-ranks-21st-of-22-asian-countries-in-internet-d...Yeah nah :lol: Yeah nah .
|
|
|
Murdoch Rags Ltd
|
|
Group: Banned Members
Posts: 1.2K,
Visits: 0
|
rusty wrote:Murdoch Rags Ltd wrote:So out of interest, what do forumites think of why the Libs chose a second rate NBN? I see it between 3 alternatives: 1) Purely as a marketing point of difference to Labor in 2010 2) To keep the internet slower for homes, so Murdoch's Foxtel cable tv would be more competitive against streaming services 3) To keep Telstra more relevant, to make up for its terrible valuation since its staged sale from 1997 & help the Libs 'save face' over its sale (its worth noting that the stage two sale in 1999 resulted in massive losses for buyers at $7.40/share, now under $4.00 in 1999 terms) 4) because its a fucking waste of of money no other government in the world is cocky and stupid enough to try But the 'better economic managers' didn't choose none at all....:idea:
|
|
|
grazorblade
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 19K,
Visits: 0
|
gotta admit i don't care about NBN I'm tempted to defend Labour over this due to Labours superior policy for the poor middle and even upper middle class but I'm wary of confirmation bias
In victoria the libs were introducing an east west busway. I had a lot of friends who were labour supporters because they cared about the poor but ended up attacking the east west link in what I saw as a pretty biased way. In truth if politics was just about the best public transport system, the best place to build a bridge or the best way to build an NBN I probably would never care about politics
|
|
|
Jong Gabe
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 2.8K,
Visits: 0
|
Lord KA is here, time to pull out the banhammer.
E
|
|
|
rusty
|
|
Group: Banned Members
Posts: 6.1K,
Visits: 0
|
Aikhme wrote:They can actually still install FTTP down the track but spending the extra money?
It's just that they chose to save the money and roll out the the FTTN Network 4 years ahead of time. With technology becoming smaller and wireless and mobile services becoming the norm I think fixed line technologies are five minutes to midnight. There's already a trend happening in countries such in Japan where people are ditching their fibre connections in favour of 4G/5G alternatives. As the evolution of satellite and wireless technologies continues it will crowd out the fixed line market as people won't want to pay for multiple services when their smart phone can do fulfill most of their needs. It should have been FTTN all the way from the beginning, as was Rudd's original plan. We could have had a modest internet upgrade for roughly $4 billion taxpayers keeping us competitive for at least the next couple of decades, invested in other important infrastructure such mas metro rail which we are severely lagging in and left open the possibility for further NBN investments such as G fast , 5G or FTTP depending on global technology trends and economic and budget considerations. Instead Conroy and Labor got carried away and decided to play Nostradamus and pork barrel our building fund into securing Conroy's personal legacy. If they stuck with FTTN the network would be complete by now, we'd be top 20 or higher for international broadband rankings and we'd have saved tens of billions of dollars that could be used to invest in roads and rail. Edited by rusty: 23/5/2016 10:38:14 AM
|
|
|
mcjules
|
|
Group: Moderators
Posts: 8.4K,
Visits: 0
|
Murdoch Rags Ltd wrote:So out of interest, what do forumites think of why the Libs chose a second rate NBN? I see it between 3 alternatives: 1) Purely as a marketing point of difference to Labor in 2010 2) To keep the internet slower for homes, so Murdoch's Foxtel cable tv would be more competitive against streaming services 3) To keep Telstra more relevant, to make up for its terrible valuation since its staged sale from 1997 & help the Libs 'save face' over its sale (its worth noting that the stage two sale in 1999 resulted in massive losses for buyers at $7.40/share, now under $4.00 in 1999 terms) Sorry missed this one earlier, definitely all of the above. 1. was the initial idea but those other 2 were nice bonuses for them.
Insert Gertjan Verbeek gifs here
|
|
|
Murdoch Rags Ltd
|
|
Group: Banned Members
Posts: 1.2K,
Visits: 0
|
grazorblade wrote:In victoria the libs were introducing an east west busway. I had a lot of friends who were labour supporters because they cared about the poor but ended up attacking the east west link in what I saw as a pretty biased way. Don't you mean east west link toll road?
|
|
|
Murdoch Rags Ltd
|
|
Group: Banned Members
Posts: 1.2K,
Visits: 0
|
mcjules wrote:Murdoch Rags Ltd wrote:So out of interest, what do forumites think of why the Libs chose a second rate NBN? I see it between 3 alternatives: 1) Purely as a marketing point of difference to Labor in 2010 2) To keep the internet slower for homes, so Murdoch's Foxtel cable tv would be more competitive against streaming services 3) To keep Telstra more relevant, to make up for its terrible valuation since its staged sale from 1997 & help the Libs 'save face' over its sale (its worth noting that the stage two sale in 1999 resulted in massive losses for buyers at $7.40/share, now under $4.00 in 1999 terms) Sorry missed this one earlier, definitely all of the above. 1. was the initial idea but those other 2 were nice bonuses for them. I thought point 2 was conspiracy nutty at the time it was suggested, until you sit down and contemplate it. It makes sense. I'm on Optus HFC, high speed (up to 100Mbps) and regularly have connection problems with streaming. Almost always an issue during and after rain.
|
|
|
grazorblade
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 19K,
Visits: 0
|
Murdoch Rags Ltd wrote:grazorblade wrote:In victoria the libs were introducing an east west busway. I had a lot of friends who were labour supporters because they cared about the poor but ended up attacking the east west link in what I saw as a pretty biased way. Don't you mean east west link toll road? ha I believe so ](*,) ](*,)
|
|
|
grazorblade
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 19K,
Visits: 0
|
Meanwhile since I said busway. Melbourne could really use a brisbane style busway
has anyone used that busway? It rocks. Best part of Bris public transport
|
|
|
Murdoch Rags Ltd
|
|
Group: Banned Members
Posts: 1.2K,
Visits: 0
|
grazorblade wrote:Murdoch Rags Ltd wrote:grazorblade wrote:In victoria the libs were introducing an east west busway. I had a lot of friends who were labour supporters because they cared about the poor but ended up attacking the east west link in what I saw as a pretty biased way. Don't you mean east west link toll road? ha I believe so ](*,) ](*,) Then I am glad it was scrapped too. No leftie bias involved. It's funds have been diverted towards the $11B inner city metro link. A gazillion more people will benefit from it. The Libs signed the contracts for the east-west link just a few weeks out from an election they were forecast, confidently, to lose. Labor said they would scrap it, yet the Libs went ahead anyway and signed anyway. They could have waited just a little longer until after the election. The Libs, not Labor, cost us $300M+. Bottom of the barrel shit.
|
|
|
rusty
|
|
Group: Banned Members
Posts: 6.1K,
Visits: 0
|
It's not surprise at all that Shorten is catching up to Turnbull in approval and popularity ratings. He was only really popular among lefty green and labor supporters because of his pro gay marriage, pro environment stance, even though they would never vote for the liberal party. All Shorten had to do was take a side step to the left and make marriage equality and green taxes the focal point of his campaign in order to claw back that support. This is what happens when parties react to polls rather than fighting for their principles. If Liberals lose the election I hope they go down badly and those bedwetters who ousted Abbott lose their seats.
|
|
|
AzzaMarch
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 1.7K,
Visits: 0
|
Murdoch Rags Ltd wrote:grazorblade wrote:Murdoch Rags Ltd wrote:grazorblade wrote:In victoria the libs were introducing an east west busway. I had a lot of friends who were labour supporters because they cared about the poor but ended up attacking the east west link in what I saw as a pretty biased way. Don't you mean east west link toll road? ha I believe so ](*,) ](*,) Then I am glad it was scrapped too. No leftie bias involved. It's funds have been diverted towards the $11B inner city metro link. A gazillion more people will benefit from it. The Libs signed the contracts for the east-west link just a few weeks out from an election they were forecast, confidently, to lose. Labor said they would scrap it, yet the Libs went ahead anyway and signed anyway. They could have waited just a little longer until after the election. The Libs, not Labor, cost us $300M+. Bottom of the barrel shit. There is a common thread through these infrastructure projects, whether done by ALP or Libs, and whether the infrastructure is the NBN, EastWest, Public Transport etc... And that is - there is very little transparency about the cost-benefit analysis work done, and very rarely do the economic cases for projects get released. There is also very little, to no, release of reporting as to why Option A was selected, as opposed to Project B or C. So the public is left to speculate about the economic merits of one project over another, with very little evidence. This is not to say that the govt should only invest in infrastructure which is profitable - if it was profitable the private sector would have invested. But there is just so little valid cost-benefit analysis done. It will never happen, but there needs to be a stringent process of infrastructure approval - this body would decide the priority of projects, the govt stumps up the funds only.
|
|
|
AzzaMarch
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 1.7K,
Visits: 0
|
rusty wrote:It's not surprise at all that Shorten is catching up to Turnbull in approval and popularity ratings. He was only really popular among lefty green and labor supporters because of his pro gay marriage, pro environment stance, even though they would never vote for the liberal party. All Shorten had to do was take a side step to the left and make marriage equality and green taxes the focal point of his campaign in order to claw back that support. This is what happens when parties react to polls rather than fighting for their principles. If Liberals lose the election I hope they go down badly and those bedwetters who ousted Abbott lose their seats.
Except that Turnbull is still far more popular than Abbott was when he was ousted....
|
|
|
rusty
|
|
Group: Banned Members
Posts: 6.1K,
Visits: 0
|
AzzaMarch wrote:rusty wrote:It's not surprise at all that Shorten is catching up to Turnbull in approval and popularity ratings. He was only really popular among lefty green and labor supporters because of his pro gay marriage, pro environment stance, even though they would never vote for the liberal party. All Shorten had to do was take a side step to the left and make marriage equality and green taxes the focal point of his campaign in order to claw back that support. This is what happens when parties react to polls rather than fighting for their principles. If Liberals lose the election I hope they go down badly and those bedwetters who ousted Abbott lose their seats.
Except that Turnbull is still far more popular than Abbott was when he was ousted.... Among lefties
|
|
|