i want you to tell me. are you incapable of that?

by the way, have they found the plane yet?

Edited by ricecrackers: 27/3/2014 09:46:42 PM

Spends his days trolling ET. Never writes a positive post. Never agrees with anyone even if they share the same view. Deliberately antagonises other posters by writing smarmy posts in a "know-it-all" tone. Rarely posts links to his outrageous views. Never contributes to the "light-hearted" threads unless its to antagonise or criticise.

I think he wasn't hugged when he was young.

So, I'm sending him a hug……………. and an olive branch to lighten up a little.

http://www.smh.com.au/world/missing-mh370-thai-satellite-spots-300-floating-objects-in-search-area-20140327-zqnrp.html

so not agreeing with the crowd despite actual proven facts not being on the crowd's side is considered negative?
what kind of group think are you running here?

why should i have to agree with you when you're wrong?

Why does ricecrackers remind me of mk ??

i want you to tell me, can you do that without posting a link?

the link says 300 objects... could be anything

Do you have any other explanation as to why there are over 300 pieces of flotsam floating in the very, very specific section of the Indian Ocean in which they happen to be searching?

Its ok to not agree with the crowd.

i'm not trolling anybody
on the contrary, i'm being bullied into agreeing with something i'm not convinced is yet proven

Nah, even mk had an upside.

It's amazing the way you're always right and everyone else is always wrong. It's like arguing with the Catholic Church. But at least they can admit when they've fucked up. :oops:

God did it.

No , god didn't do it . It was zlatan

lying again :^o liar boy :^o

there's a lot of rubbish in the sea
you should get out of your mother's basement some time

I'm sorry, I don't want to sound like I'm bullying. We just want you to post something positive so we know there's a real person under there.

I know what its like to be the solo voice on one side of an argument. Believe it or not I used to be a conservative and a climate sceptic. I read many books on the subject, including Heaven and Earth by Ian Plimer. I also got into a lot of the conspiracies surrounding 9/11, even though it was basically sacrilegious to think that it was a false-flag operation. And I always felt like everyone was against me.

I know I put in a lot of memes and gifs, but its just to try and lighten the mood a fraction.

There is a lot of rubbish in the sea, but in such a high concentration in the very specific area in which they happen to be searching is far more astronomical odds than the plane being somewhere else.

If you're going to accuse me of lying provide direct evidence or shut the fuck up.

To be fair it could be flotsam.

After all the oceans are filled with garbage BUT given the rest of the evidence, particularly the Immarsat stuff, it's looking more likely every day it was MH370.

Time will tell of course and then I'll be the first one here looking for the big "I WUZ WRONGS I TELLS YA" post from RC.



Edited by munrubenmuz: 27/3/2014 10:27:04 PM

The basic principle of the immersat evidence was pretty compelling reason to believe they're searching in the right place.

There's a huge amount of flotsam and jetsam floating around in the ocean but it's never in such a high concentration as what they've found in the search area. The fact that they've flown all the necessary equipment to locate the black boxes to the search area should say everything.

I hear ya but there's an outside chance it isn't. I don't believe it of course but if we're going to be as scientific, as we ask ol mate to be, then we have to apply the same principles to ourselves.

This.

The indications are strong but they're just indications until they locate it for certain.

Outrageous suggestion. The mere thought of providing evidence is anathema to RC.

That truly will be the day.

what does any of this have to do with 9/11? why did you even bring that up?
so being conservative and skeptical is negative in your mind? perhaps that's just your perspective

tell me please, if that plane ended up where they said it did... how did it get there?
i want to know your opinion, not some link spam

look at the families of the majority of passengers on that flight... they dont know how it got there, they're not convinced by any of this and nor is the Chinese Govt.

why i am i being attacked for it? i'm just asking for further evidence because so far nothing has been positively identified as belonging to that plane. that's not some conspiracy, that's fact. no one, including our govt have stated that the debris seen in the ocean is definitely that plane. it could be anything.

if you want to talk about some wild conspiracy, then how the hell did it get there in the first place considering it was scheduled to fly in the opposition direction thousands of miles away?

I was trying to send you an olive branch. Being a conservative and a climate sceptic is not a negative in my mind as I used to be one. Its just a different point of view. The points I was making weren't related to this air crash or any conspiracies. All I was saying was that I know what it's like to hold a view that isn't popular. I was trying to be nice and apologise for making you feel like you had been bullied.

well if you're trying to apologise fine, accepted.
it sounded like you were lecturing me though, i apologise if i got the wrong impression

meanwhile...


http://www.newstrackindia.com/newsdetails/2014/03/27/223-Suspected-MH370-debris-pieces-too-small-for-rescue-ships-to-detect-.html

Edited by ricecrackers: 27/3/2014 10:52:30 PM

It's ok. Internet high five.

I'm hounding you because you make outrageous statements, cherry pick data, insult posters and obfuscate on every topic you post on and then, when asked for proof, treat everyone like they're a moron for doing so.

I'll say again, for someone with a science degree you have a pretty poor grasp of how this sort of thing should work.

Well you see RC, that's what they're trying to find out. Rather then guess, they're looking for evidence.

Talk about reading what you want to, you bold two sentences and completely ignore the following sentence which states that THEY WOULDN'T BE ABLE TO BE PICKED UP ON RADAR ANYWAY.