paulc
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 15K,
Visits: 0
|
Benjamin wrote:paulc wrote:Benjamin wrote:paulc wrote:Put up or shut up. Talking of put up or shut up, two times yesterday you stated that I have a vested interest in South Melbourne - two times I asked what is was - two times you ignored the question... Going for the hattrick? Big deal. You have interest in Hellas, most here don't. Explains alot. More important than than your diversion is SM Hellas should demonstrate it's intention to broaden with actions as it has come short big time. I guess two minute NSL wonders like yourself find it hard to understand. In other words - after being given THREE opportunities to explain my 'vested interest' you are unable to do so. Dismissing it with a 'big deal' doesn't answer the question. In another words - you refuse to accept my full comment that you have an interest in Hellas whilst most here do not. That's a good enough answer. I'm curious, you say you liked the big crowds and was a casual spectator when Hellas was in the NSL however since then thousands of its supporters have abandoned the club to just a few hundred. So how is and what is it that makes you continue that association if you haven't got anything to gain by being a "casual supporter" in a depleted club playing inferior football? Go on, confess!
In a resort somewhere
|
|
|
|
Arthur
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 5.1K,
Visits: 0
|
paulc wrote:Arthur wrote:paulc wrote:Of course Ben, it's important to keep the SM Hellas propaganda on the table. Well done. And exactly how many posts in these 96 pages have you contributed to Paul? With others giving you guys a reality check, many Arthur. Keep those reality checks comming Paul as we head to 100 pages.
|
|
|
paulc
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 15K,
Visits: 0
|
lardface wrote:Benjamin wrote:lardface wrote:If the above post isn't trolling i'll go jump in a lake. Who are the moderators this thread should be forwarded too? It's insulting towards heart fans. Al the moderators are well aware of this thread. The general opinion is that there is nothing going on in here that is against the rules. End of the day - if you don't like it, don't read it. Considering the massive number of threads which routinely refer to Victory/Heart/Melbourne people as 'Tards', I think a discussion about the viability of one franchise, and the options to replace them IF they fail, is hardly the biggest source of insults on the forum. If it were a proactive discussion that would be good unfortunately it's not it's a troll. Trolling is when the thread starter posts a highly illogical inflammatory subject and tries to feed it by bumping it repeatedly to get attention for themselves or their cause. The highly illogical subject by this thread's starter was suggesting the heart be removed from the a-league in place of south, the thread starter has continued to bump the thread each time adding any material however irrelevant it is, following the traditional trolling method. There is no effort by the thread starter to develop a proactive intelligent discussion because the starting point is so ludicrous that this was never his intention. With the bitter south fans getting involved in the thread to try and suck heart fans into replying, some heart fans inevitably will reply because the suggestion that their club be removed from the league even if irrational is still is highly emotive. This is normally when the moderators on a forum would step in and lock a thread and ban the poster for a while to encourage positive discussions instead of flamming. For some reason you've misinterpreted the thread starter's trolling as a legitimate discussion about possible replacements if a franchise fails. Persistent trolling is often contagious as other posters realise they don't need to provide logic or reason for their threads, the usual pattern is more and more threads start up of this nature and the quality of discussion in the forum is dragged down as posters who attempt to post intelligent genuine discussion points are dissuaded from giving their thoughts, eventually this results in a less interesting and visited forum. Benjamin works hard behind the scene to get his way. It is in his selfish interest to keep the topic of a Hellas return by keeping it alive despite the concerns you have rightly raised. Benjamin has a clear conflict of interest with his moderator duties despite his denials.
In a resort somewhere
|
|
|
paulc
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 15K,
Visits: 0
|
Arthur wrote:paulc wrote:Arthur wrote:paulc wrote:Of course Ben, it's important to keep the SM Hellas propaganda on the table. Well done. And exactly how many posts in these 96 pages have you contributed to Paul? With others giving you guys a reality check, many Arthur. Keep those reality checks comming Paul as we head to 100 pages. I only comment immediately after the Hellas propaganda hits the front page. It's not me that's bumping it.
In a resort somewhere
|
|
|
Glory Recruit
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 13K,
Visits: 0
|
The expansion thread is for this kind of shit
|
|
|
GCU till I die
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 472,
Visits: 0
|
Aussie4ever4 wrote:The expansion thread is for this kind of shit Replacement won't expand anything
|
|
|
Glory Recruit
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 13K,
Visits: 0
|
GCU till I die wrote:Aussie4ever4 wrote:The expansion thread is for this kind of shit Replacement won't expand anything As written in the index "Discussion of A-League expansion including market share, potential franchises, viability of existing franchises, history of previous franchises, etc."
|
|
|
Benjamin
|
|
Group: Moderators
Posts: 23K,
Visits: 0
|
paulc wrote:Benjamin works hard behind the scene to get his way. It is in his selfish interest to keep the topic of a Hellas return by keeping it alive despite the concerns you have rightly raised.
Benjamin has a clear conflict of interest with his moderator duties despite his denials. STILL waiting to hear how its in my interest to keep the subject alive - and still baffled that you try to pretend that your comments aren't posted in order to elicit a response and thus keep the thread alive. If the pro-Heart or anti-South groups really wanted to this topic to die, all they have to do is ignore it. Interesting that you can't. Would love to know what I am doing 'behind the scene' too - I think my activities on this forum are all extremely open for all to see. And once again, because you never seem to get it, it is not the duty of the moderators on this forum to be neutral. Our only duty is to ensure that the conduct of other forum members is kept in line. There has been no abuse, no swearing, no threats, etc., on this thread. I'm pretty sure that after all this time - if there was an issue with the way I handled my mod duties, one of the mods, or one of the 442 guys, would have said something.
|
|
|
paulc
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 15K,
Visits: 0
|
Benjamin wrote:paulc wrote:Benjamin works hard behind the scene to get his way. It is in his selfish interest to keep the topic of a Hellas return by keeping it alive despite the concerns you have rightly raised.
Benjamin has a clear conflict of interest with his moderator duties despite his denials. STILL waiting to hear how its in my interest to keep the subject alive - and still baffled that you try to pretend that your comments aren't posted in order to elicit a response and thus keep the thread alive. If the pro-Heart or anti-South groups really wanted to this topic to die, all they have to do is ignore it. Interesting that you can't. Would love to know what I am doing 'behind the scene' too - I think my activities on this forum are all extremely open for all to see. And once again, because you never seem to get it, it is not the duty of the moderators on this forum to be neutral. Our only duty is to ensure that the conduct of other forum members is kept in line. There has been no abuse, no swearing, no threats, etc., on this thread. I'm pretty sure that after all this time - if there was an issue with the way I handled my mod duties, one of the mods, or one of the 442 guys, would have said something. You keep ignoring my comments, I said I only respond when the propaganda keeps hitting the front page. It is your and your fellow Hellas members tactics, not mine. Many have complained about the appropratness of these discussion in this forum. You seem to battle every step to ensure it stays alive. Because it appears you have some reading deficiency when it suits, here's one of them pointing the finger at you! Happy reading. Quote:If it were a proactive discussion that would be good unfortunately it's not it's a troll. Trolling is when the thread starter posts a highly illogical inflammatory subject and tries to feed it by bumping it repeatedly to get attention for themselves or their cause. The highly illogical subject by this thread's starter was suggesting the heart be removed from the a-league in place of south, the thread starter has continued to bump the thread each time adding any material however irrelevant it is, following the traditional trolling method. There is no effort by the thread starter to develop a proactive intelligent discussion because the starting point is so ludicrous that this was never his intention. With the bitter south fans getting involved in the thread to try and suck heart fans into replying, some heart fans inevitably will reply because the suggestion that their club be removed from the league even if irrational is still is highly emotive. This is normally when the moderators on a forum would step in and lock a thread and ban the poster for a while to encourage positive discussions instead of flamming. For some reason you've misinterpreted the thread starter's trolling as a legitimate discussion about possible replacements if a franchise fails. Persistent trolling is often contagious as other posters realise they don't need to provide logic or reason for their threads, the usual pattern is more and more threads start up of this nature and the quality of discussion in the forum is dragged down as posters who attempt to post intelligent genuine discussion points are dissuaded from giving their thoughts, eventually this results in a less interesting and visited forum. Indeed, you do step in. To keep the cause alive. And you say you have no conflict. :oops:
In a resort somewhere
|
|
|
Benjamin
|
|
Group: Moderators
Posts: 23K,
Visits: 0
|
paulc wrote:Benjamin wrote:paulc wrote:Benjamin wrote:paulc wrote:Put up or shut up. Talking of put up or shut up, two times yesterday you stated that I have a vested interest in South Melbourne - two times I asked what is was - two times you ignored the question... Going for the hattrick? Big deal. You have interest in Hellas, most here don't. Explains alot. There's an enormous difference between someone being a supporter, and posting comments due to that support (it accounts for the majority of traffic on this forum), and posting because you have a vested interest and stand to gain from posting (which was your inference)More important than than your diversion is SM Hellas should demonstrate it's intention to broaden with actions as it has come short big time. I guess two minute NSL wonders like yourself find it hard to understand. In other words - after being given THREE opportunities to explain my 'vested interest' you are unable to do so. Dismissing it with a 'big deal' doesn't answer the question. In another words - you refuse to accept my full comment that you have an interest in Hellas whilst most here do not. That's a good enough answer. I'm curious, you say you liked the big crowds and was a casual spectator when Hellas was in the NSL however since then thousands of its supporters have abandoned the club to just a few hundred. So how is and what is it that makes you continue that association if you haven't got anything to gain by being a "casual supporter" in a depleted club playing inferior football? Go on, confess! Confess what? I went to games, I enjoyed it, I kept going. I'm not responsible for supporters who stopped going. Perhaps the very fact (that you hate) that I wasn't onboard during the title winning days meant that watching the club in the State league didn't bother me in the way it bothered long time followers. Perhaps the fact that I was watching the club because I liked them, rather than to watch top league football had something to do with it (this may be Eurosnobby, but having watched football at a far higher standard than the A-League from age 8 to 29 going to games here was never about 'quality' football). So - I'm still waiting to hear what the 'interest' is - other than being a supporter (which I've never denied). You inferred before that I stand to gain from my interest - in what way? Edited by Benjamin: 5/2/2013 04:32:02 PM
|
|
|
paulc
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 15K,
Visits: 0
|
Benjamin wrote:paulc wrote:Benjamin wrote:paulc wrote:Benjamin wrote:paulc wrote:Put up or shut up. Talking of put up or shut up, two times yesterday you stated that I have a vested interest in South Melbourne - two times I asked what is was - two times you ignored the question... Going for the hattrick? Big deal. You have interest in Hellas, most here don't. Explains alot. More important than than your diversion is SM Hellas should demonstrate it's intention to broaden with actions as it has come short big time. I guess two minute NSL wonders like yourself find it hard to understand. In other words - after being given THREE opportunities to explain my 'vested interest' you are unable to do so. Dismissing it with a 'big deal' doesn't answer the question. In another words - you refuse to accept my full comment that you have an interest in Hellas whilst most here do not. That's a good enough answer. I'm curious, you say you liked the big crowds and was a casual spectator when Hellas was in the NSL however since then thousands of its supporters have abandoned the club to just a few hundred. So how is and what is it that makes you continue that association if you haven't got anything to gain by being a "casual supporter" in a depleted club playing inferior football? Go on, confess! Confess what? I went to games, I enjoyed it, I kept going. I'm not responsible for supporters who stopped going. Perhaps the very fact (that you hate) that I wasn't onboard during the title winning days meant that watching the club in the State league didn't bother me in the way it bothered long time followers. Perhaps the fact that I was watching the club because I liked them, rather than to watch top league football had something to do with it (this may be Eurosnobby, but having watched football at a far higher standard than the A-League from age 8 to 29 going to games here was never about 'quality' football). Why does it sound like you're not telling it all but rather some deflective bullshit? Edited by paulc: 5/2/2013 04:33:43 PM
In a resort somewhere
|
|
|
GCU till I die
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 472,
Visits: 0
|
Benj
Is there a keepy-up wager going on at 442 ? you seem to be using paulc as the ball.
|
|
|
Benjamin
|
|
Group: Moderators
Posts: 23K,
Visits: 0
|
Because you don't like it?
|
|
|
Benjamin
|
|
Group: Moderators
Posts: 23K,
Visits: 0
|
GCU till I die wrote:Benj
Is there a keepy-up wager going on at 442 ? you seem to be using paulc as the ball. He doesn't seem to realise. ;) 97 pages - Chris, I think you're gonna get your century. Edited by Benjamin: 5/2/2013 04:33:49 PM
|
|
|
Benjamin
|
|
Group: Moderators
Posts: 23K,
Visits: 0
|
paulc wrote:Benjamin wrote:paulc wrote:Benjamin wrote:paulc wrote:Benjamin wrote:paulc wrote:Put up or shut up. Talking of put up or shut up, two times yesterday you stated that I have a vested interest in South Melbourne - two times I asked what is was - two times you ignored the question... Going for the hattrick? Big deal. You have interest in Hellas, most here don't. Explains alot. More important than than your diversion is SM Hellas should demonstrate it's intention to broaden with actions as it has come short big time. I guess two minute NSL wonders like yourself find it hard to understand. In other words - after being given THREE opportunities to explain my 'vested interest' you are unable to do so. Dismissing it with a 'big deal' doesn't answer the question. In another words - you refuse to accept my full comment that you have an interest in Hellas whilst most here do not. That's a good enough answer. I'm curious, you say you liked the big crowds and was a casual spectator when Hellas was in the NSL however since then thousands of its supporters have abandoned the club to just a few hundred. So how is and what is it that makes you continue that association if you haven't got anything to gain by being a "casual supporter" in a depleted club playing inferior football? Go on, confess! Confess what? I went to games, I enjoyed it, I kept going. I'm not responsible for supporters who stopped going. Perhaps the very fact (that you hate) that I wasn't onboard during the title winning days meant that watching the club in the State league didn't bother me in the way it bothered long time followers. Perhaps the fact that I was watching the club because I liked them, rather than to watch top league football had something to do with it (this may be Eurosnobby, but having watched football at a far higher standard than the A-League from age 8 to 29 going to games here was never about 'quality' football). Why does it sound like you're not telling it all but rather some deflective bullshit? Edited by paulc: 5/2/2013 04:33:43 PM Your original comment was "why do it sound like bullshit?" - nice of you to try and tidy up. Deflective in what way? Again, you make a comment which infers some hidden secrets and agendas... Are you THAT paranoid? You ask a question... I answer it... You don't like the answer... Suddenly it's bullshit. Please tell me you haven't got Rado working out all this stuff for you. Edited by Benjamin: 5/2/2013 04:36:58 PM
|
|
|
paulc
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 15K,
Visits: 0
|
Benjamin wrote:paulc wrote:Benjamin wrote:paulc wrote:Benjamin wrote:paulc wrote:Benjamin wrote:paulc wrote:Put up or shut up. Talking of put up or shut up, two times yesterday you stated that I have a vested interest in South Melbourne - two times I asked what is was - two times you ignored the question... Going for the hattrick? Big deal. You have interest in Hellas, most here don't. Explains alot. More important than than your diversion is SM Hellas should demonstrate it's intention to broaden with actions as it has come short big time. I guess two minute NSL wonders like yourself find it hard to understand. In other words - after being given THREE opportunities to explain my 'vested interest' you are unable to do so. Dismissing it with a 'big deal' doesn't answer the question. In another words - you refuse to accept my full comment that you have an interest in Hellas whilst most here do not. That's a good enough answer. I'm curious, you say you liked the big crowds and was a casual spectator when Hellas was in the NSL however since then thousands of its supporters have abandoned the club to just a few hundred. So how is and what is it that makes you continue that association if you haven't got anything to gain by being a "casual supporter" in a depleted club playing inferior football? Go on, confess! Confess what? I went to games, I enjoyed it, I kept going. I'm not responsible for supporters who stopped going. Perhaps the very fact (that you hate) that I wasn't onboard during the title winning days meant that watching the club in the State league didn't bother me in the way it bothered long time followers. Perhaps the fact that I was watching the club because I liked them, rather than to watch top league football had something to do with it (this may be Eurosnobby, but having watched football at a far higher standard than the A-League from age 8 to 29 going to games here was never about 'quality' football). Why does it sound like you're not telling it all but rather some deflective bullshit? Edited by paulc: 5/2/2013 04:33:43 PM Your original comment was "why do it sound like bullshit?" - nice of you to try and tidy up. Deflective in what way? Again, you make a comment which infers some hidden secrets and agendas... Are you THAT paranoid? You ask a question... I answer it... You don't like the answer... Suddenly it's bullshit. Please tell me you haven't got Rado working out all this stuff for you. Edited by Benjamin: 5/2/2013 04:36:58 PM :lol:
In a resort somewhere
|
|
|
Red_or_Dead
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 1K,
Visits: 0
|
Shit, a few more pages and SMFC will even trump the WSW supporters' thread!
NRMAIWSWFC Out -> SXFCSMFC In
|
|
|
jak
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 110,
Visits: 0
|
Not that I care either way, but for the record I believe that gabgabgab39 (who is apparently a Victory supporter) was one of the people who kept bumping this thread up the list. It wasn't always SMFC supporters.
|
|
|
imonfourfourtwo
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 2.9K,
Visits: 0
|
This thread
|
|
|
chris
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 3.6K,
Visits: 0
|
paulc wrote:Benjamin wrote:paulc wrote:Benjamin works hard behind the scene to get his way. It is in his selfish interest to keep the topic of a Hellas return by keeping it alive despite the concerns you have rightly raised.
Benjamin has a clear conflict of interest with his moderator duties despite his denials. STILL waiting to hear how its in my interest to keep the subject alive - and still baffled that you try to pretend that your comments aren't posted in order to elicit a response and thus keep the thread alive. If the pro-Heart or anti-South groups really wanted to this topic to die, all they have to do is ignore it. Interesting that you can't. Would love to know what I am doing 'behind the scene' too - I think my activities on this forum are all extremely open for all to see. And once again, because you never seem to get it, it is not the duty of the moderators on this forum to be neutral. Our only duty is to ensure that the conduct of other forum members is kept in line. There has been no abuse, no swearing, no threats, etc., on this thread. I'm pretty sure that after all this time - if there was an issue with the way I handled my mod duties, one of the mods, or one of the 442 guys, would have said something. You keep ignoring my comments, I said I only respond when the propaganda keeps hitting the front page. It is your and your fellow Hellas members tactics, not mine. Many have complained about the appropratness of these discussion in this forum. You seem to battle every step to ensure it stays alive. Because it appears you have some reading deficiency when it suits, here's one of them pointing the finger at you! Happy reading. Quote:If it were a proactive discussion that would be good unfortunately it's not it's a troll. Trolling is when the thread starter posts a highly illogical inflammatory subject and tries to feed it by bumping it repeatedly to get attention for themselves or their cause. The highly illogical subject by this thread's starter was suggesting the heart be removed from the a-league in place of south, the thread starter has continued to bump the thread each time adding any material however irrelevant it is, following the traditional trolling method. There is no effort by the thread starter to develop a proactive intelligent discussion because the starting point is so ludicrous that this was never his intention. With the bitter south fans getting involved in the thread to try and suck heart fans into replying, some heart fans inevitably will reply because the suggestion that their club be removed from the league even if irrational is still is highly emotive. This is normally when the moderators on a forum would step in and lock a thread and ban the poster for a while to encourage positive discussions instead of flamming. For some reason you've misinterpreted the thread starter's trolling as a legitimate discussion about possible replacements if a franchise fails. Persistent trolling is often contagious as other posters realise they don't need to provide logic or reason for their threads, the usual pattern is more and more threads start up of this nature and the quality of discussion in the forum is dragged down as posters who attempt to post intelligent genuine discussion points are dissuaded from giving their thoughts, eventually this results in a less interesting and visited forum. Indeed, you do step in. To keep the cause alive. And you say you have no conflict. :oops: Actually his thread has also introduced some new posters Smfc some stimulating activity
|
|
|
Arthur
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 5.1K,
Visits: 0
|
paulc wrote:Arthur wrote:paulc wrote:Arthur wrote:paulc wrote:Of course Ben, it's important to keep the SM Hellas propaganda on the table. Well done. And exactly how many posts in these 96 pages have you contributed to Paul? With others giving you guys a reality check, many Arthur. Keep those reality checks comming Paul as we head to 100 pages. I only comment immediately after the Hellas propaganda hits the front page. It's not me that's bumping it. Propaganda is every where!
|
|
|
Benjamin
|
|
Group: Moderators
Posts: 23K,
Visits: 0
|
paulc wrote:Many have complained about the appropratness of these discussion in this forum. You seem to battle every step to ensure it stays alive. Because it appears you have some reading deficiency when it suits, here's one of them pointing the finger at you! Happy reading. Quote:If it were a proactive discussion that would be good unfortunately it's not it's a troll. Trolling is when the thread starter posts a highly illogical inflammatory subject and tries to feed it by bumping it repeatedly to get attention for themselves or their cause. The highly illogical subject by this thread's starter was suggesting the heart be removed from the a-league in place of south, the thread starter has continued to bump the thread each time adding any material however irrelevant it is, following the traditional trolling method. There is no effort by the thread starter to develop a proactive intelligent discussion because the starting point is so ludicrous that this was never his intention. With the bitter south fans getting involved in the thread to try and suck heart fans into replying, some heart fans inevitably will reply because the suggestion that their club be removed from the league even if irrational is still is highly emotive. This is normally when the moderators on a forum would step in and lock a thread and ban the poster for a while to encourage positive discussions instead of flamming. For some reason you've misinterpreted the thread starter's trolling as a legitimate discussion about possible replacements if a franchise fails. Persistent trolling is often contagious as other posters realise they don't need to provide logic or reason for their threads, the usual pattern is more and more threads start up of this nature and the quality of discussion in the forum is dragged down as posters who attempt to post intelligent genuine discussion points are dissuaded from giving their thoughts, eventually this results in a less interesting and visited forum. Indeed, you do step in. To keep the cause alive. And you say you have no conflict. :oops: Strange that none of the other moderators have seen fit to close the thread either - perhaps because no rules have been broken? Still haven't a clue how there can be a conflict of interest - no rules have been broken, so no action is required. If I allowed threatening behavior, foul or abusive language or the like by South fans, whilst banning anti-South fans THAT would be an abuse of power caused by a conflict of interests - however to date I haven't banned anyone in the anti-South camp, in fact the only person I can recall banning was a South fan who was being abusive to non-South supporters.
|
|
|
rusty
|
|
Group: Banned Members
Posts: 6.1K,
Visits: 0
|
Arthur wrote:I'm confused is the Football landscape under the FFA better for you now or not?
I pretty much think its better and I reckon most SMFC supporters would agree the footprint started by the FFA would benefit SMFC if we were in the HAL.
Well if we are to examine history we can't leap to that conclusion. The football landscape for Perth an Adelaide is better than it was during the NSL yet the crowds aren't. The A leauge picked up traction on the back of brand new broadbased franchise clubs such as Victory and Sydney, the pre-existing brands did not benefit massively. It's obvious it was in these untapped markets where the growth was to be found not in the existing markets.
Adelaide and Perth need their old nemesis, SMFC, included to re-invigorate the juices. Lets not forget some of their best crowds were against SMFC. Though as your statement clearly implies I would not say that Herat's lack of identity is affecting the ability of franchises like Perth and Adelaide to attract crowds.
I don't think Souths inclusion would do wonders for Adelaide and Perth's crowds. South Melbourne was never Adelaides "old nemesis" and Perth achived healthy crowds on its own terms without Souths assistance.
What would probably reinvigroate these clubs more than playing South is winning a championship, or playing more entertaining football.
No doubt Heart isn't the greatest crowd puller but normally if clubs are struggling to pull crowds its got more to do with the clubs oeprations and performance not their opponents.
Now you are a marketing guru? Under the conditions set by the FFA, the pervailing enviroment and financial investment in the HAL of course South Melbourne can develop its brand so that all revenue sources are on an upward trend. A third derby to save Heart and increased attendance for Perth and Adelaide. Win win for everyone.
Heart, Perth and Adelaide are probably going to have to find success on their own initiative and not wait for South to come in and save the day.
Perhaps South would dilute the Melbourne derby taking away supporters and revenue from that, and the main rivalry would develop between South and Victory, effectively killing off Heart and their derby lifeline. Heart lose.
Of course some SMFC supporters crticise the FFA, I can't blame them for several issues that have left a sourtaste in the mouth.
While these are personal issues we all realise that SMFC is about playing at the highest level possible.
It's not feasible for South to play at the highest level anymore. Football has graduated to another level and you are no longer the big wigs around town.
South has done nothing to absolutey nothing merit A league entry, other than a bit of hsitory and a hgue amount of wank there is nothing interesting about your bid. The only way I can see South getting back in is via protmoiton and relegation, but that is a long way away.
Maybe this might be Melbourne Heart's fate?
I wouldn't be against it. FFA now have a track record of building successful brands while South don't.
|
|
|
rusty
|
|
Group: Banned Members
Posts: 6.1K,
Visits: 0
|
Benjamin wrote:Strange that none of the other moderators have seen fit to close the thread either - perhaps because no rules have been broken? Well that's a bit diffcult Ben when the moderator is South fan Perhaps if you supported another team this thread might have taken a different turn.
|
|
|
paulc
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 15K,
Visits: 0
|
rusty wrote:Benjamin wrote:Strange that none of the other moderators have seen fit to close the thread either - perhaps because no rules have been broken? Well that's a bit diffcult Ben when the moderator is South fan Perhaps if you supported another team this thread might have taken a different turn. I think you're spot on.
In a resort somewhere
|
|
|
Arthur
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 5.1K,
Visits: 0
|
rusty wrote:
No doubt Heart isn't the greatest crowd puller but normally if clubs are struggling to pull crowds its got more to do [size=6]with the clubs oeprations and performance not their opponents.[/size]
I will highlight this comment for two reasons; 1. The assumption here is that Heart is not pulling crowds due to "..the clubs operations and performance.......". So they are doing something wrong. Here in lies the commentary about Heart's "relevance" and "identity" in the current footballing landscape, as identified by Football Media Commentators and of course many forumites on 442. So we are agreed that Heart has issues that no-one can deny. 2. So the question from Chri's point of view, as a SMFC supporter, is can SMFC do a better job? Of course he and others like myself believe the answer is yes, due to the many external factors that now dominate the game. Now leaving these two key points I have come to the conclusion that the introduction of SMFC to the A-League with the retention of Heart of course, will increase Heart's ability to generate cashlows by having three home derbies per season. That many A-League Clubs with NSL history will also benefit by having games against an old nemesis. That the strength of the game right now is Melbourne, the crowds, the sponsorships, the media interest is here. This will help grow the game and SMFC is well placed in infrastructure terms, financial backing and its current brand is still strong enough to allow it into the A-League running on all cylinders. It may also have the follow effects of; a) improving the unity of the game b) set an acheivable bench mark either for former traditional older clubs to make changes in an evolutionary way to also acheive A-League status if so inclined. Or set a precedent for more investment in the second tier clubs who may also be ambitious enough to seek A-League Status.
|
|
|
Arthur
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 5.1K,
Visits: 0
|
paulc wrote:rusty wrote:Benjamin wrote:Strange that none of the other moderators have seen fit to close the thread either - perhaps because no rules have been broken? Well that's a bit diffcult Ben when the moderator is South fan Perhaps if you supported another team this thread might have taken a different turn. I think you're spot on. Well take you complaint's further if you think you've been aggrievied or treated unfairly.
|
|
|
paulc
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 15K,
Visits: 0
|
You mean work it behind the scenes like two minute Ben does? Not my style.
In a resort somewhere
|
|
|
Arthur
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 5.1K,
Visits: 0
|
paulc wrote:You mean work it behind the scenes like two minute Ben does? Not my style. Now your being silly. If you don't make a formal complaint, then all you're doing is an attempt at attacking a moderators personal character hoping the mud will stick and his credibility is brought down and that is wrong.
|
|
|
Red_or_Dead
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 1K,
Visits: 0
|
Unless Chris is the last person to respond on this thread, this topic will never die.
Even if Benjamin or Arthur have the last comment, Chris will always have the last word...especially to keep propping this thread up on the first page.
So from here on, I will not reply and I encourage and advise all Heart (if not ALL HAL) fans to not fuel these gentlemen's unrealistic dreams and fantasies any longer. Without our involvement, then a topic about SMFC should only be discussed in the "State League Football" forum.
MHFC = HAL and here to stay SMFC = VPL and there to stay - Deal with it.
Thread closed.
|
|
|