BETHFC
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 8.2K,
Visits: 0
|
shallow hal wants a gal wrote:Fuck cops lowest cunts ever.
There cunts at our games and they are cunts at celebrations. Fuck the Police
|
|
|
|
Eastern Glory
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 20K,
Visits: 0
|
benelsmore wrote:blacka wrote:Police do have difficulty dealing with people who are on pills...but often when they pull someone up who might be high, they use drug illegality as a reason to search. That just escalates. As unnecessary as the war on drugs itself.
People who do hard drugs really are the scum of the earth. What stupidity. I have an issue with drug addicts... No issue at all with people casually taking something, as long as They know that if they're caught, there are consequences.
|
|
|
Eastern Glory
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 20K,
Visits: 0
|
shallow hal wants a gal wrote:Fuck cops lowest cunts ever.
There cunts at our games and they are cunts at celebrations. You should go join Harold Holt.
|
|
|
afromanGT
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 77K,
Visits: 0
|
neillucas wrote:afromanGT wrote:Heineken wrote:MvFCArsenal16.8 wrote:Farrand93 wrote:I cannot believe people think the cop is in any way at fault here. Some dickhead is whacked out on E, cop floors him when he resists... This has NOTHING to do with the gay community. This is about a criminal.
We live in a society today that has this ridiculous idea that we can do what we want without being held accountable for our actions. This guy found out the hard way. how do you know he was on e?? Drunk yes,but to say he is on drugs makes your argument redundant . It's Mardi Gras. You find me a person who isn't blind on alcohol, drugs, or both, and I'll give you the cure for cancer. You get a great shot of his face at the start of the video. His pupils aren't nearly dilated enough to be on ecstasy. There'd be practically no iris left if he was tweaking. Drugs or not, the police did the right thing. taught him a lesson. i mean i agree with human rights etc, but that dosnt mean you get trashed publicly and cause a nuisance. i have many times been a victum of drunken people, taunting, wanting to fight or whatever, when i go out for a night in the town, its plain wrong.I understand he was handcuffed but what would happen to him if they took him to the station? hed prob get a slap on the wrist and be left scott free. atleast this way he will have some bruises to remind him to not get too drunk or take to many drugs and go out causing drama's to society. peole get away with too much nowdays its bullshit.. That's not your place nor the police's place to determine. There's a prosecutor and a judge for a reason. Frankly, I hope anyone who goes "he deserved it" is on the receiving end of some unmitigated police brutality just to see whether they think they 'deserve' it. The guy is handcuffed. He's defenceless. This whole thing is fucking absurd.
|
|
|
blacka
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 3.3K,
Visits: 0
|
benelsmore wrote:I do not consider weed a hard drug, just clarifying I consider hard drugs to be those that are synthesized, often through very crude processes of isolation.
My point regarding hard drugs is there is no way to moderate one time usage. I used the example of my home routine of a beer or 2 or a scotch because you can't moderate hard drugs in the same way. You can't moderate a line of cocaine or an Ecstasy pill in such a way as to not ruin you all night.
There are people who abuse alcohol sure, they get shit faced and turn into idiots.
Drugs generally aren't dangerous on their own. LSD was synthesized as a painkiller almost a century ago. The problem is that they are illicit as you say making their production questionable but its for a good reason. Small quantities of hard drugs can be highly influential on someones behavior. Look at what heroin and cocaine can do to first time users. Look at the stress ecstasy and speed put on a persons heart and how some experience fatigue when they come down.
Ecstasy/speed/mdma/whatever you want to call the "love drug" generally isn't the problem. Its ice, amphetamines and the hard drugs that are. However, you still have people who have awful adverse reactions to MDMA and end up causing people problems. Legalizing MDMA won't stop people doing what intoxicated people do which is get whacked out and do dumb shit that endangers their lives and the lives of others.
Its a cultural problem though. With so many night clubs it seems so attractive. The issue with crude synthesized drugs is that they are illicit...its a circular argument to say they should stay illegal ...the illegality is what causes the crudeness of them. The war does more damage than the drug pretty much with all substances imo. Especially when u factor in the zero quality controls. We will have to agree to disagree on moderating doses of ecstasy and cocaine. Both these drugs are used socially in a moderate fashion all the time...folks dont see it though so it distorts their impressions of the drug. On legalising MDMA and people's propensity to do "dumb shit"...i actually believe that it would have a positive effect to legalise as u have a competitior to alcohol. And i dont know about your experiences but for me i have found more "dumb shit" happens when alcohol is consumed than pills. And same goes for ice now being such a problem...it became more popular as MDMA became more scarce. Folks will look to find alternatives and will go for what is readily available. Just saying...use alcohol or nothing....clearly this is not working.
|
|
|
afromanGT
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 77K,
Visits: 0
|
Quote:And same goes for ice now being such a problem...it became more popular as MDMA became more scarce. Folks will look to find alternatives and will go for what is readily available. Just saying...use alcohol or nothing....clearly this is not working. I wouldn't say it's one way or the other with MDMA/Ice. Ice is cheaper to synthesise and sell. When people deal in MDMA they buy it in caps or pills which is a relatively expensive production process.
|
|
|
BETHFC
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 8.2K,
Visits: 0
|
blacka wrote:benelsmore wrote:I do not consider weed a hard drug, just clarifying I consider hard drugs to be those that are synthesized, often through very crude processes of isolation.
My point regarding hard drugs is there is no way to moderate one time usage. I used the example of my home routine of a beer or 2 or a scotch because you can't moderate hard drugs in the same way. You can't moderate a line of cocaine or an Ecstasy pill in such a way as to not ruin you all night.
There are people who abuse alcohol sure, they get shit faced and turn into idiots.
Drugs generally aren't dangerous on their own. LSD was synthesized as a painkiller almost a century ago. The problem is that they are illicit as you say making their production questionable but its for a good reason. Small quantities of hard drugs can be highly influential on someones behavior. Look at what heroin and cocaine can do to first time users. Look at the stress ecstasy and speed put on a persons heart and how some experience fatigue when they come down.
Ecstasy/speed/mdma/whatever you want to call the "love drug" generally isn't the problem. Its ice, amphetamines and the hard drugs that are. However, you still have people who have awful adverse reactions to MDMA and end up causing people problems. Legalizing MDMA won't stop people doing what intoxicated people do which is get whacked out and do dumb shit that endangers their lives and the lives of others.
Its a cultural problem though. With so many night clubs it seems so attractive. The issue with crude synthesized drugs is that they are illicit...its a circular argument to say they should stay illegal ...the illegality is what causes the crudeness of them. The war does more damage than the drug pretty much with all substances imo. Especially when u factor in the zero quality controls. We will have to agree to disagree on moderating doses of ecstasy and cocaine. Both these drugs are used socially in a moderate fashion all the time...folks dont see it though so it distorts their impressions of the drug. On legalising MDMA and people's propensity to do "dumb shit"...i actually believe that it would have a positive effect to legalise as u have a competitior to alcohol. And i dont know about your experiences but for me i have found more "dumb shit" happens when alcohol is consumed than pills. And same goes for ice now being such a problem...it became more popular as MDMA became more scarce. Folks will look to find alternatives and will go for what is readily available. Just saying...use alcohol or nothing....clearly this is not working. If you legalise MDMA then it begs the question what else should be legalised? There are psychological benefits of MDMA such as use for post traumatic stress, but there are also side affects which i'm sure you're well aware of. LSD has several medical benefits, should that be legalised? Opium is an amazing pain killer. Its pandoras box should its legality be seriously considered. It would be suicide for anyone to legalise MDMA with such common side affects and health issues the result from il-educated people taking it. In saying that most people are shocked at how bad the drug is when they see footage of some useless 16 year old dying in hospital having taken it at a club when the real issue is that they're also full of alcohol containing caffiene (vodka red bull etc) and haven't had any water in 8 hours. My experience with MDMA is generally similar things happen with alcohol but just more severe. The guys on it tend to be more aggressive because the drug pumps them up so their reaction to most things is amplified. We all have our own experiences though, i'm sure yours may differ. My main issue with drugs is that they are all too often not consumed in controlled environments and the people who take them are totally unprepared for their affects and innocent people become collateral damage. People can take all the drugs they want in private, that's their choice. I've seen too many cases of emergencies caused by some tool taking pills and god knows what else at clubs and festivals and then collapsing later on through lack of consideration for the affects of the drug, or becoming violent and harming innocent people. Alcohol tends to cause fights but the emergency situations from experience are less frequent and the severity of the issues I mention is generally greater (from experience) when drugs are involved over alcohol. In saying that I agree that the tolerance for alcohol is silly. I guess i'm more anti-public nuisance as a result of these drugs. I completely avoid Surfers Paradise up here because I feel like I need an assault rifle to go there given the high concentration of organ wasters there. Of course it doesn;t work but people searching for something to be addicted to seems to be more of a cultural problem than ever. People with naturally addicive personalities are at risk given how easy these drugs are to obtain.
|
|
|
blacka
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 3.3K,
Visits: 0
|
Benelsmore: A lot of the issues u point to about mixing caffeine and pills, or alcohol and pills, are exascerbated by their illegality. For starters the pills are of poor quality, so they are more likely on speed than actual MDMA. The emergencies in clubs or festivals would be reduced if there were not the stigma attached to the drugs illegality. There are many cases of people not seeking help due to fear of getting into trouble. Whenever anything is done in an underground fashion, its always done in a more harmful way.
And also u are pointing to worst case scenarios...forgetting that for every issue there are countless others who are ok. Same as is the situation for use of alcohol. People with naturally addictive personalities get into trouble there also.
In fact much of your argument could be easily applied to alcohol when it comes to controlled environments vs night clubs etc. Yet this drug remains legal...at least be consistent. Ultimately poor laws like those relating to drugs just undermines peoples respect for the justice system in general. People are not dumb and can see the hypocrisy here. This is why so many keep flouting the law because ...based on experience... they know all the 'tough on drugs' stuff is hyperbole.
|
|
|
Glory Recruit
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 13K,
Visits: 0
|
|
|
|
notorganic
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 21K,
Visits: 0
|
Aussie4ever4 wrote:http://news.ninemsn.com.au/national/2013/03/07/19/08/new-video-emerges-of-mardi-gras-bashing I see. That completely justifies the assault continuing after he had been handcuffed.
|
|
|
blacka
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 3.3K,
Visits: 0
|
Even during the new video, its worth remembering why they were cuffing him to begin with....an innocuous tickle followed by offensive language...the kid is clearly unused to dealing with police. If i didnt know better from experience, i probably would have struggled also given how absurd the initial reason was for him to be bailed up. It basically looks like he's some entitled kid chucking a tantrum...not realising how police would react..
Its easy to see why a Liverpool cop would react that way given the type of folks they are used to dealing with. Classic case of westie and inner city culture clash LOL ...that style of policing is basically every weekend occurance in that cops LAC.
|
|
|
Mr
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 6K,
Visits: 0
|
Even an apology won't get him out of the assulting police charge. What a tool.
|
|
|
blacka
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 3.3K,
Visits: 0
|
The start of this new video still has him pinned to the ground...why did they do that to begin with? If he feels unjustly restrained it is natural for some people unaccustomed to police to chuck a hissy fit. Clearly anyone who has watched 'police in action' would realise how dumb an idea this is.
Still unanswered questions here leading up to it...and the way he's being handled following.
|
|
|
BETHFC
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 8.2K,
Visits: 0
|
blacka wrote:The start of this new video still has him pinned to the ground...why did they do that to begin with? If he feels unjustly restrained it is natural for some people unaccustomed to police to chuck a hissy fit. Clearly anyone who has watched 'police in action' would realise how dumb an idea this is.
Still unanswered questions here leading up to it...and the way he's being handled following. Its stupidity to try and battle police though. Police don't pick on people for no reason, if he got to the point of being restrained in the first place he must have been doing something wrong.
|
|
|
notorganic
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 21K,
Visits: 0
|
benelsmore wrote:Police don't pick on people for no reason Most don't, some absolutely do.
|
|
|
BETHFC
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 8.2K,
Visits: 0
|
notorganic wrote:benelsmore wrote:Police don't pick on people for no reason Most don't, some absolutely do. I call bullshit.
|
|
|
afromanGT
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 77K,
Visits: 0
|
notorganic wrote:Aussie4ever4 wrote:http://news.ninemsn.com.au/national/2013/03/07/19/08/new-video-emerges-of-mardi-gras-bashing I see. That completely justifies the assault continuing after he had been handcuffed. I know, right? Once you've been handcuffed you're obviously still a major threat to the arresting officer and should subsequently have your life endangered. The worst part is this is going to be used as justification for this whole thing to be swept under the carpet instead of the police officer in question being reprimanded/sacked. benelsmore wrote:Police don't pick on people for no reason Can confirm that they really do. In the last week I've watched VicPol officers harangue escorts, backpackers, inebriants and even couples heading to their car. Make no mistake, there are officers out there who are purely in the occupation to bully.
|
|
|
blacka
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 3.3K,
Visits: 0
|
benelsmore wrote:Its stupidity to try and battle police though. Police don't pick on people for no reason, if he got to the point of being restrained in the first place he must have been doing something wrong. Agree with the first bit, absolutely stupid ...possibly understandable on a bunch of levels when u assess the specifics... The reason he was restrained based on available info is...offensive language...annoying some girl (who apparently did not complain)...maybe they also thought he was off chops so was fair (and easy) game. Probably figured he may have been carrying? Either way...disproportionate...?
|
|
|
ozboy
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 6.5K,
Visits: 0
|
Mr wrote:Even an apology won't get him out of the assulting police charge. What a tool. Considering you're religious, that explains your simplistic thinking.
|
|
|
Carlito
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 28K,
Visits: 0
|
ozboy wrote:Mr wrote:Even an apology won't get him out of the assulting police charge. What a tool. Considering you're religious, that explains your simplistic thinking. what does religion have to do with anything ???
|
|
|
ozboy
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 6.5K,
Visits: 0
|
benelsmore wrote:People with naturally addicive personalities are at risk given how easy these drugs are to obtain. Youda thunk this statement would demonstrate someone without dichotomous, simplistic thinking.....
|
|
|
ozboy
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 6.5K,
Visits: 0
|
MvFCArsenal16.8 wrote:ozboy wrote:Mr wrote:Even an apology won't get him out of the assulting police charge. What a tool. Considering you're religious, that explains your simplistic thinking. what does religion have to do with anything ??? One's ideology speaks PLENTY
|
|
|
Mr
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 6K,
Visits: 0
|
ozboy wrote:Mr wrote:Even an apology won't get him out of the assulting police charge. What a tool. Considering you're religious, that explains your simplistic thinking. Your statement says a lot about you, none of it good.
|
|
|
ozboy
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 6.5K,
Visits: 0
|
Mr wrote:ozboy wrote:Mr wrote:Even an apology won't get him out of the assulting police charge. What a tool. Considering you're religious, that explains your simplistic thinking. Your statement says a lot about you, none of it good. Coming from someone who approves of institutionalised violence against the defenceless. You might wanna spend more of your wasted time reading the New Testament rather than the Old.......
|
|
|
Carlito
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 28K,
Visits: 0
|
ozboy wrote:Mr wrote:ozboy wrote:Mr wrote:Even an apology won't get him out of the assulting police charge. What a tool. Considering you're religious, that explains your simplistic thinking. Your statement says a lot about you, none of it good. Coming from someone who approves of institutionalised violence against the defenceless. You might wanna spend more of your wasted time reading the New Testament rather than the Old....... again what does one's religion have to do with any of this ????how do you that Mr is religious ? He could like you a total right wing anti religious nutter. Edited by mvfcarsenal16.8: 9/3/2013 04:38:06 PM
|
|
|
Heineken
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 49K,
Visits: 0
|
MvFCArsenal16.8 wrote:ozboy wrote:Mr wrote:ozboy wrote:Mr wrote:Even an apology won't get him out of the assulting police charge. What a tool. Considering you're religious, that explains your simplistic thinking. Your statement says a lot about you, none of it good. Coming from someone who approves of institutionalised violence against the defenceless. You might wanna spend more of your wasted time reading the New Testament rather than the Old....... again what does one's religion have to do with any of this ????how do you that Mr is religious ? He could like you a total right wing anti religious nutter. Edited by mvfcarsenal16.8: 9/3/2013 04:38:06 PM Dude, it's Ozboy. The answer in finding the cure for cancer is going to be more simple than working out his little agenda fueled rants.
WOLLONGONG WOLVES FOR A-LEAGUE EXPANSION!

|
|
|
Carlito
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 28K,
Visits: 0
|
Heineken wrote:MvFCArsenal16.8 wrote:ozboy wrote:Mr wrote:ozboy wrote:Mr wrote:Even an apology won't get him out of the assulting police charge. What a tool. Considering you're religious, that explains your simplistic thinking. Your statement says a lot about you, none of it good. Coming from someone who approves of institutionalised violence against the defenceless. You might wanna spend more of your wasted time reading the New Testament rather than the Old....... again what does one's religion have to do with any of this ????how do you that Mr is religious ? He could like you a total right wing anti religious nutter. Edited by mvfcarsenal16.8: 9/3/2013 04:38:06 PM Dude, it's Ozboy. The answer in finding the cure for cancer is going to be more simple than working out his little agenda fueled rants. true . I can see Ozzie blaming someone's religion for being a cause of that persons cancer..... I shouldn't joke my dad had cancer ...
|
|
|
TheSelectFew
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 30K,
Visits: 0
|
benelsmore wrote:notorganic wrote:benelsmore wrote:Police don't pick on people for no reason Most don't, some absolutely do. I call bullshit. Politicians are also true to their word. :roll: ](*,) :-$
|
|
|
ozboy
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 6.5K,
Visits: 0
|
Heineken wrote:MvFCArsenal16.8 wrote:ozboy wrote:Mr wrote:ozboy wrote:Mr wrote:Even an apology won't get him out of the assulting police charge. What a tool. Considering you're religious, that explains your simplistic thinking. Your statement says a lot about you, none of it good. Coming from someone who approves of institutionalised violence against the defenceless. You might wanna spend more of your wasted time reading the New Testament rather than the Old....... again what does one's religion have to do with any of this ????how do you that Mr is religious ? He could like you a total right wing anti religious nutter. Edited by mvfcarsenal16.8: 9/3/2013 04:38:06 PM Dude, it's Ozboy. The answer in finding the cure for cancer is going to be more simple than working out his little agenda fueled rants. Just had a look back over your posts in this thread. Naive much?
|
|
|
Mr
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 6K,
Visits: 0
|
Quote:Coming from someone who approves of institutionalised violence against the defenceless. You might wanna spend more of your wasted time reading the New Testament rather than the Old....... :shock: That youth assaulted at least one police officer, and it's on video. In your twisted mind he may be defenceless, but to a judge and a jury of normal ( read sane) citizens they will see someone resisting arrest, assaulting police, and generally acting in disrespect of the standards our community asks of it's citizens. Why should our police, nurses, teachers, bus drivers have to deal with individuals who set out to harm them like that tool was doing as he launched kicks and at least one punch into the head/face of a NSW police officer? As to your other comments, you're embarrassing yourself. Right or left wing, spit polished or not, you lack class and it shows.
|
|
|