DO YOU LIVE A LOW IMPACT GREEN CONCIOUS LIFE OR ARE YOU JUST ANOTHER CONSUMER?????????


DO YOU LIVE A LOW IMPACT GREEN CONCIOUS LIFE OR ARE YOU JUST ANOTHER...

Author
Message
thupercoach
thupercoach
World Class
World Class (8.4K reputation)World Class (8.4K reputation)World Class (8.4K reputation)World Class (8.4K reputation)World Class (8.4K reputation)World Class (8.4K reputation)World Class (8.4K reputation)World Class (8.4K reputation)World Class (8.4K reputation)World Class (8.4K reputation)World Class (8.4K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 8.3K, Visits: 0
batfink wrote:
Mr wrote:
notorganic wrote:
Mr wrote:
afromanGT wrote:
Mr wrote:
notorganic wrote:
afromanGT wrote:
Mr wrote:
afromanGT wrote:
Quote:
Someone who drives two hours to get a few dozen eggs attempting to lecture on environmental efficiency. So you are aware, your two hours accounts for higher carbon emissions than the transport for a shelf of Coles eggs produces.

I'd challenge that. Farm to packaging, packaging to storage warehouse, storage warehouse distribution to stores...that's going to have pretty high emissions.


Transport to transport - car is worse.

The landed cost of carbon would be calculated across the whole load. From farm to packaging to DC and then to store are all in bulk, using diesel trucks. Eggs are but a very small part of a store load.

Compare that to the entire two hours being landed against a few dozen, and you will find that emissions per egg are higher.

Emissions per egg are irrelevant when you're comparing bulk to the two dozen eggs that Notor needs.

Farm to packaging uses say 50mg of CO2, packaging to storage uses another 50mg of CO2, warehouse to store distribution uses 50mg of CO2. That's 150mg regardless of whether it's one egg, two dozen eggs or 4,000 eggs.

Meanwhile, Notor drives for 2 hours to pick up his two dozen eggs from the farm and uses 100mg of CO2.


I also buy far more than 2 dozen, and do far more on the trip than just buy eggs *facepalm*


My goodness you are dumb.

Assuming in AfromanGT's example carbon impact of 100mg is spread across say your 4 dozen.

Coles total supply chain impact of transport is loaded between 4,000 eggs or 333 cartons.

Your impact is 25mg per carton, Coles is 0.45mg per carton.

Driving to the shops for one item is the worst carbon impact for shopping. Driving two hours for an item costing $4.00 per unit is dumb, if not environmentally irresponsible.

Carbon emissions per egg are irrelevant. He's not buying 4,000 eggs. He's buying the same four dozen eggs.

If you were talking about the cumulative carbon footprint from EVERYBODY going and buying their own eggs from the farm you might have a point. But they don't. And we aren't.

We're talking about the carbon footprint of notorcantic's actions as an individual. And for the commercial eggs it doesn't matter if there's three eggs or three thousand eggs, transporting them uses the same amount of carbon dioxide.


You walk to the Coles store and buy a carton = 0.45gm. 332 people do the same.

Notorganised drives an hour to the farm, buys two dozen and drives an hour back. 100mg.

Environmental impact for his action is worse for the environment. The other 332 people who do the same as you have shared the carbon impact.


Wrong on so many levels.


Listen up champ.

You source non local product, and ignore product brought local to you by efficient use of transport systems. Your decisions are harmful to the environment in this case. Change your behaviour and do better for our planet.


you failed to balance your argument ( as feeble as it may be)with the carbon produces by the coal power that runs the hundreds and hundreds of lights to fool the hens into laying, the truck that deliver the wood shavings,the bobcat that cleans the shed, the truck that takes the manure away, then there is the cruelty to the animals,the replacement of dead hens at a much higher rate, the incubator to hatch the chicks, the high levels of chemivals and drugs required to keep these hens alive.....and on it goes...fake nature is expensive....
In business this is known as triple bottom line accounting. Kids take note from someone who's clearly running one.
Eastern Glory
Eastern Glory
Legend
Legend (21K reputation)Legend (21K reputation)Legend (21K reputation)Legend (21K reputation)Legend (21K reputation)Legend (21K reputation)Legend (21K reputation)Legend (21K reputation)Legend (21K reputation)Legend (21K reputation)Legend (21K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 20K, Visits: 0
I only eat free range carrots.
batfink
batfink
Legend
Legend (10K reputation)Legend (10K reputation)Legend (10K reputation)Legend (10K reputation)Legend (10K reputation)Legend (10K reputation)Legend (10K reputation)Legend (10K reputation)Legend (10K reputation)Legend (10K reputation)Legend (10K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 9.9K, Visits: 0
Eastern Glory wrote:
I only eat free range carrots.



i have my own theory on what you do with the carrots.....;) :-" #-o
imnofreak
imnofreak
Legend
Legend (36K reputation)Legend (36K reputation)Legend (36K reputation)Legend (36K reputation)Legend (36K reputation)Legend (36K reputation)Legend (36K reputation)Legend (36K reputation)Legend (36K reputation)Legend (36K reputation)Legend (36K reputation)

Group: Moderators
Posts: 35K, Visits: 0
I feel like this thread is getting progressively dumber.

Shame because it was a decent concept.
notorganic
notorganic
Legend
Legend (21K reputation)Legend (21K reputation)Legend (21K reputation)Legend (21K reputation)Legend (21K reputation)Legend (21K reputation)Legend (21K reputation)Legend (21K reputation)Legend (21K reputation)Legend (21K reputation)Legend (21K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 21K, Visits: 0
imnofreak wrote:
I feel like this thread is getting progressively dumber.

Shame because it was a decent concept.


I'm not sure about progressively... It was a pretty steep dumb cliff that it fell off.
batfink
batfink
Legend
Legend (10K reputation)Legend (10K reputation)Legend (10K reputation)Legend (10K reputation)Legend (10K reputation)Legend (10K reputation)Legend (10K reputation)Legend (10K reputation)Legend (10K reputation)Legend (10K reputation)Legend (10K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 9.9K, Visits: 0
notorganic wrote:
imnofreak wrote:
I feel like this thread is getting progressively dumber.

Shame because it was a decent concept.


I'm not sure about progressively... It was a pretty steep dumb cliff that it fell off.


it was and is a great thread except it was hijacked by a person of limited intelligence
Eastern Glory
Eastern Glory
Legend
Legend (21K reputation)Legend (21K reputation)Legend (21K reputation)Legend (21K reputation)Legend (21K reputation)Legend (21K reputation)Legend (21K reputation)Legend (21K reputation)Legend (21K reputation)Legend (21K reputation)Legend (21K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 20K, Visits: 0
batfink wrote:
Eastern Glory wrote:
I only eat free range carrots.



i have my own theory on what you do with the carrots.....;) :-" #-o


I also purchased 2 boxes of caged eggs :-"
batfink
batfink
Legend
Legend (10K reputation)Legend (10K reputation)Legend (10K reputation)Legend (10K reputation)Legend (10K reputation)Legend (10K reputation)Legend (10K reputation)Legend (10K reputation)Legend (10K reputation)Legend (10K reputation)Legend (10K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 9.9K, Visits: 0
we have to pay for another recycling bin from council due to how efficient my darling wife is at recycling and of course how many empty wine bottles i dispose of......not sure it's fair that i have to pay for an additional recycling bin.....

our main rubbish bin is collected weekly but the recycle bin is fortnightly...is everyone's the same???

Edited by batfink: 8/7/2013 05:49:05 PM
batfink
batfink
Legend
Legend (10K reputation)Legend (10K reputation)Legend (10K reputation)Legend (10K reputation)Legend (10K reputation)Legend (10K reputation)Legend (10K reputation)Legend (10K reputation)Legend (10K reputation)Legend (10K reputation)Legend (10K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 9.9K, Visits: 0
We also collect all our food scraps in a special bin i installed in the kitchen, this is used to feed to chickens,ducks and geese. I have an arrangement with a local farmer whereby i collect old round bales of hay/meadow/oats/lucerne that have been spoiled and are of no use to him.....i barter with some of my pork meat or sausages/bacon/ that i make......i bring the bales back home and use them for pig bedding in there mobile huts i made and also in their paddocks if its a bit muddy......the pigs are very clean and defecate in the same area each day and we pitch fork the hay onto it to keep the smell down......later i muck out the pigs pens with my baby tractor and make around 40-60 cubic metres of manure a year........i then use this on my veggie garden which is about the size of 2 netball courts, and my wifes veggie garden which is about half a netball court in size,however jam packed with her herbs and small stuff.........then i grow my crops of potatoes,garlic,onions,turnips,carrots,corn...ETC ETC... and when they are done i put a single strand electric fence up around the section of veggie garden i want "tractored" and the pigs do the rest....they do a great job....just about good enough to plant straight into.......we also use the manure for the citris trees......




batfink
batfink
Legend
Legend (10K reputation)Legend (10K reputation)Legend (10K reputation)Legend (10K reputation)Legend (10K reputation)Legend (10K reputation)Legend (10K reputation)Legend (10K reputation)Legend (10K reputation)Legend (10K reputation)Legend (10K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 9.9K, Visits: 0
Eastern Glory wrote:
batfink wrote:
Eastern Glory wrote:
I only eat free range carrots.



i have my own theory on what you do with the carrots.....;) :-" #-o


I also purchased 2 boxes of caged eggs :-"


well good for you guy...!!!!!!!yippee...!!!!:oops: :oops:

why not go and but some meat packed on a bleached sanitary pad and wrapped in plastic and inert gas?????? and if your lucky it might come from a feedlot and may have been washed in ammonia to kill the ecoli
notorganic
notorganic
Legend
Legend (21K reputation)Legend (21K reputation)Legend (21K reputation)Legend (21K reputation)Legend (21K reputation)Legend (21K reputation)Legend (21K reputation)Legend (21K reputation)Legend (21K reputation)Legend (21K reputation)Legend (21K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 21K, Visits: 0
I like this batfink better than the batfink that has a passionate interest in politics.
Mr
Mr
World Class
World Class (6.1K reputation)World Class (6.1K reputation)World Class (6.1K reputation)World Class (6.1K reputation)World Class (6.1K reputation)World Class (6.1K reputation)World Class (6.1K reputation)World Class (6.1K reputation)World Class (6.1K reputation)World Class (6.1K reputation)World Class (6.1K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 6K, Visits: 0
Green conscious = humane treatment of animals regardless of carbon impact...?
ozboy
ozboy
World Class
World Class (7K reputation)World Class (7K reputation)World Class (7K reputation)World Class (7K reputation)World Class (7K reputation)World Class (7K reputation)World Class (7K reputation)World Class (7K reputation)World Class (7K reputation)World Class (7K reputation)World Class (7K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 6.5K, Visits: 0
Court rules chicken 'free to roam' label misleading

The Federal Court has found poultry producer Baiada misled people by claiming its chickens were "free to roam".

The Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (ACCC) took legal action against the owner of Steggles over its use of the term in advertising campaigns.

It was argued while the birds are housed in large sheds, they can only move in a space equivalent in size to a sheet of A4 paper.

A federal judge has agreed the company and peak industry body Chicken Meat Federation have misled consumers by using the term "free to roam".

The industry has already stopped using the term in advertising.

http://www.abc.net.au/news/2013-07-08/court-rules-baiada-free-to-roam-label-misleading/4807136?section=vic
batfink
batfink
Legend
Legend (10K reputation)Legend (10K reputation)Legend (10K reputation)Legend (10K reputation)Legend (10K reputation)Legend (10K reputation)Legend (10K reputation)Legend (10K reputation)Legend (10K reputation)Legend (10K reputation)Legend (10K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 9.9K, Visits: 0
ozboy wrote:
Court rules chicken 'free to roam' label misleading

The Federal Court has found poultry producer Baiada misled people by claiming its chickens were "free to roam".

The Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (ACCC) took legal action against the owner of Steggles over its use of the term in advertising campaigns.

It was argued while the birds are housed in large sheds, they can only move in a space equivalent in size to a sheet of A4 paper.

A federal judge has agreed the company and peak industry body Chicken Meat Federation have misled consumers by using the term "free to roam".

The industry has already stopped using the term in advertising.

http://www.abc.net.au/news/2013-07-08/court-rules-baiada-free-to-roam-label-misleading/4807136?section=vic



this is accurate of the barn fed industry.....

it's also accurate of the type of people who will do anything to get an advantage......

i sell suckling pigs to restuarants and i have supplied some top chefs who appear on my kitchen rules and Masterchef....... and they don't really know what they are getting....

i have to compete against a pig supplier who say's he supplies free range, heritage pork and its as close to organic as can be......

i laugh because this prick utilises chemical castration of pigs, he has a big paddock of 10 different breeds going at it with no control.....he just selects the piglets out of the paddock and supplies them as heritage pork.....but they are all xbred

real free range heritage pork providores use natural castration at around 5 months, prior to that it is not required, they use proper free range methods and they breed true heritage pigs....

there are around eight heritage pig breeds......the large black,berkshire,tamworth,wessex saddleback,duroc and a few other that don't come to mind......

so there are always people who operate on the fringe and cut corners and don't really have a passion for the industry....it's your job as a consumer to make sure you are purchasing the right product for the benefit of the animal the industry and the country....

here in lies the problems...you are all consumers who are to lazy to make the effort.....

does a few $$$ a week really hurt the hip pocket all that much....????

i guess it does if your are listening to coles and woolworths adds.......






batfink
batfink
Legend
Legend (10K reputation)Legend (10K reputation)Legend (10K reputation)Legend (10K reputation)Legend (10K reputation)Legend (10K reputation)Legend (10K reputation)Legend (10K reputation)Legend (10K reputation)Legend (10K reputation)Legend (10K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 9.9K, Visits: 0
Mr wrote:
Green conscious = humane treatment of animals regardless of carbon impact...?


if you did your research you would find ethical and humane treatment of animals has no carbon footprint..........actually if we took your arguments we would slaughter every animals including humans because they omit methane.......:cool:
afromanGT
afromanGT
Legend
Legend (77K reputation)Legend (77K reputation)Legend (77K reputation)Legend (77K reputation)Legend (77K reputation)Legend (77K reputation)Legend (77K reputation)Legend (77K reputation)Legend (77K reputation)Legend (77K reputation)Legend (77K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 77K, Visits: 0
pv4 wrote:
Early nomination for "well that escalated quickly" thread of the year, afro

It was too busy crashing down to the bottom to be escalating anywhere.
Mr
Mr
World Class
World Class (6.1K reputation)World Class (6.1K reputation)World Class (6.1K reputation)World Class (6.1K reputation)World Class (6.1K reputation)World Class (6.1K reputation)World Class (6.1K reputation)World Class (6.1K reputation)World Class (6.1K reputation)World Class (6.1K reputation)World Class (6.1K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 6K, Visits: 0
batfink wrote:
Mr wrote:
Green conscious = humane treatment of animals regardless of carbon impact...?


if you did your research you would find ethical and humane treatment of animals has no carbon footprint..........actually if we took your arguments we would slaughter every animals including humans because they omit methane.......:cool:


Some more than others...
afromanGT
afromanGT
Legend
Legend (77K reputation)Legend (77K reputation)Legend (77K reputation)Legend (77K reputation)Legend (77K reputation)Legend (77K reputation)Legend (77K reputation)Legend (77K reputation)Legend (77K reputation)Legend (77K reputation)Legend (77K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 77K, Visits: 0
batfink wrote:
Mr wrote:
Green conscious = humane treatment of animals regardless of carbon impact...?


if you did your research you would find ethical and humane treatment of animals has no carbon footprint..........actually if we took your arguments we would slaughter every animals including humans because they omit methane.......:cool:

It may have 'no' carbon footprint but that doesn't mean that it's environmentally friendly. Many farmers in Argentina over the last decade switched from crops of grains etc to livestock (specifically cattle) because of a perceived higher profit margin but the animals destroyed the land and now they can't farm anything.
notorganic
notorganic
Legend
Legend (21K reputation)Legend (21K reputation)Legend (21K reputation)Legend (21K reputation)Legend (21K reputation)Legend (21K reputation)Legend (21K reputation)Legend (21K reputation)Legend (21K reputation)Legend (21K reputation)Legend (21K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 21K, Visits: 0
afromanGT wrote:
batfink wrote:
Mr wrote:
Green conscious = humane treatment of animals regardless of carbon impact...?


if you did your research you would find ethical and humane treatment of animals has no carbon footprint..........actually if we took your arguments we would slaughter every animals including humans because they omit methane.......:cool:

It may have 'no' carbon footprint but that doesn't mean that it's environmentally friendly. Many farmers in Argentina over the last decade switched from crops of grains etc to livestock (specifically cattle) because of a perceived higher profit margin but the animals destroyed the land and now they can't farm anything.


Poor farming practices
afromanGT
afromanGT
Legend
Legend (77K reputation)Legend (77K reputation)Legend (77K reputation)Legend (77K reputation)Legend (77K reputation)Legend (77K reputation)Legend (77K reputation)Legend (77K reputation)Legend (77K reputation)Legend (77K reputation)Legend (77K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 77K, Visits: 0
notorganic wrote:
afromanGT wrote:
batfink wrote:
Mr wrote:
Green conscious = humane treatment of animals regardless of carbon impact...?


if you did your research you would find ethical and humane treatment of animals has no carbon footprint..........actually if we took your arguments we would slaughter every animals including humans because they omit methane.......:cool:

It may have 'no' carbon footprint but that doesn't mean that it's environmentally friendly. Many farmers in Argentina over the last decade switched from crops of grains etc to livestock (specifically cattle) because of a perceived higher profit margin but the animals destroyed the land and now they can't farm anything.


Poor farming practices

Absolutely. Farmers inexperienced in livestock overfarming and screwing themselves over. Crux of the presentation is that minimal carbon footprint =/= environmentally friendly.
notorganic
notorganic
Legend
Legend (21K reputation)Legend (21K reputation)Legend (21K reputation)Legend (21K reputation)Legend (21K reputation)Legend (21K reputation)Legend (21K reputation)Legend (21K reputation)Legend (21K reputation)Legend (21K reputation)Legend (21K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 21K, Visits: 0
https://theconversation.com/why-market-forces-dont-protect-animal-welfare-15501
batfink
batfink
Legend
Legend (10K reputation)Legend (10K reputation)Legend (10K reputation)Legend (10K reputation)Legend (10K reputation)Legend (10K reputation)Legend (10K reputation)Legend (10K reputation)Legend (10K reputation)Legend (10K reputation)Legend (10K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 9.9K, Visits: 0
afromanGT wrote:
batfink wrote:
Mr wrote:
Green conscious = humane treatment of animals regardless of carbon impact...?


if you did your research you would find ethical and humane treatment of animals has no carbon footprint..........actually if we took your arguments we would slaughter every animals including humans because they omit methane.......:cool:

It may have 'no' carbon footprint but that doesn't mean that it's environmentally friendly. Many farmers in Argentina over the last decade switched from crops of grains etc to livestock (specifically cattle) because of a perceived higher profit margin but the animals destroyed the land and now they can't farm anything.


well of course you need to apply a balance sustainable approach to anything in life for it to be practicle,functional and sustainable.....over cropping & overgrazing are poor management problems.
batfink
batfink
Legend
Legend (10K reputation)Legend (10K reputation)Legend (10K reputation)Legend (10K reputation)Legend (10K reputation)Legend (10K reputation)Legend (10K reputation)Legend (10K reputation)Legend (10K reputation)Legend (10K reputation)Legend (10K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 9.9K, Visits: 0
notorganic wrote:
https://theconversation.com/why-market-forces-dont-protect-animal-welfare-15501


It is believed that Pigs actually have the intelligence/personality of a 4 year old child.....so when you see those images of the stall kept pigs its easy to see that they are stressed, they are being kept within the law and have feed and water and vetinary care, however they aren't happy...which converts to lower quality pork.....
pv4
pv4
Legend
Legend (13K reputation)Legend (13K reputation)Legend (13K reputation)Legend (13K reputation)Legend (13K reputation)Legend (13K reputation)Legend (13K reputation)Legend (13K reputation)Legend (13K reputation)Legend (13K reputation)Legend (13K reputation)

Group: Moderators
Posts: 12K, Visits: 0
batfink wrote:
notorganic wrote:
https://theconversation.com/why-market-forces-dont-protect-animal-welfare-15501


It is believed that Pigs actually have the intelligence/personality of a 4 year old child.....so when you see those images of the stall kept pigs its easy to see that they are stressed, they are being kept within the law and have feed and water and vetinary care, however they aren't happy...which converts to lower quality pork.....


I'm really not up to scratch on my meat quality knowledge. Does a stressed animal lead to worse meat? Would a stressed pig lead to worse ham and bacon too, or just pork (I know it's meat from the same animal, but not sure if the stress affects only certain parts, etc)? Sorry if these are stupid questions, genuinely interested though
notorganic
notorganic
Legend
Legend (21K reputation)Legend (21K reputation)Legend (21K reputation)Legend (21K reputation)Legend (21K reputation)Legend (21K reputation)Legend (21K reputation)Legend (21K reputation)Legend (21K reputation)Legend (21K reputation)Legend (21K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 21K, Visits: 0
Pork definitely, bacon and ham I'm not sure because of the curing process. It'san iinteresting question
batfink
batfink
Legend
Legend (10K reputation)Legend (10K reputation)Legend (10K reputation)Legend (10K reputation)Legend (10K reputation)Legend (10K reputation)Legend (10K reputation)Legend (10K reputation)Legend (10K reputation)Legend (10K reputation)Legend (10K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 9.9K, Visits: 0
notorganic wrote:
Pork definitely, bacon and ham I'm not sure because of the curing process. It'san iinteresting question



yeah well i am guessing that if you start with a piece of pork that has been under stress that then the cured product would be of lesser quality as well......

i know that the best hams,pancetta,prosciutto makers feed there pigs on a strict diet and they are freerange black pigs....mainly they graze under orchard trees to tidy up windfall.
rusty
rusty
World Class
World Class (6.2K reputation)World Class (6.2K reputation)World Class (6.2K reputation)World Class (6.2K reputation)World Class (6.2K reputation)World Class (6.2K reputation)World Class (6.2K reputation)World Class (6.2K reputation)World Class (6.2K reputation)World Class (6.2K reputation)World Class (6.2K reputation)

Group: Banned Members
Posts: 6.1K, Visits: 0
batfink wrote:

It is believed that Pigs actually have the intelligence/personality of a 4 year old child.....


You actually believe that? :lol:

ozboy
ozboy
World Class
World Class (7K reputation)World Class (7K reputation)World Class (7K reputation)World Class (7K reputation)World Class (7K reputation)World Class (7K reputation)World Class (7K reputation)World Class (7K reputation)World Class (7K reputation)World Class (7K reputation)World Class (7K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 6.5K, Visits: 0
Mr wrote:
Green conscious = humane treatment of animals regardless of carbon impact...?

Dichotomous thinking.
ozboy
ozboy
World Class
World Class (7K reputation)World Class (7K reputation)World Class (7K reputation)World Class (7K reputation)World Class (7K reputation)World Class (7K reputation)World Class (7K reputation)World Class (7K reputation)World Class (7K reputation)World Class (7K reputation)World Class (7K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 6.5K, Visits: 0
rusty wrote:
batfink wrote:

It is believed that Pigs actually have the intelligence/personality of a 4 year old child.....


You actually believe that? :lol:

Hey rusty. I followed up on that statistician who dismissed the right v left wing IQ research.
I noted that he is heavily religious and is a signatory to the very unscientific Cornwall Alliance.
http://www.cornwallalliance.org/

Edited by ozboy: 9/7/2013 11:38:41 AM
rusty
rusty
World Class
World Class (6.2K reputation)World Class (6.2K reputation)World Class (6.2K reputation)World Class (6.2K reputation)World Class (6.2K reputation)World Class (6.2K reputation)World Class (6.2K reputation)World Class (6.2K reputation)World Class (6.2K reputation)World Class (6.2K reputation)World Class (6.2K reputation)

Group: Banned Members
Posts: 6.1K, Visits: 0
I care a little bit about the environment but I care more about technology, progress and innovation, so I've got no issue bulldozing a few trees and koalas homes if it improves the quality of our lives. You can always grow more trees somewhere else, it's not like we're running out of trees. There's plenty of trees for everyone.
GO


Select a Forum....























Inside Sport


Search