The 2013 Forum Awards take 2 - WINNERS PAGE 15


The 2013 Forum Awards take 2 - WINNERS PAGE 15

Author
Message
afromanGT
afromanGT
Legend
Legend (77K reputation)Legend (77K reputation)Legend (77K reputation)Legend (77K reputation)Legend (77K reputation)Legend (77K reputation)Legend (77K reputation)Legend (77K reputation)Legend (77K reputation)Legend (77K reputation)Legend (77K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 77K, Visits: 0
ducky42 wrote:
afromanGT wrote:
The following users have complained loudly but are yet to submit votes:
- Ducky
- TSF
- melbourneboys
- notorganic

Why the fuck would I partake in an obviously corrupt process?

You can't prove the process is corrupt if you don't participate.
ducky42
ducky42
Pro
Pro (4.6K reputation)Pro (4.6K reputation)Pro (4.6K reputation)Pro (4.6K reputation)Pro (4.6K reputation)Pro (4.6K reputation)Pro (4.6K reputation)Pro (4.6K reputation)Pro (4.6K reputation)Pro (4.6K reputation)Pro (4.6K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 4.5K, Visits: 0
afromanGT wrote:
ducky42 wrote:
afromanGT wrote:
The following users have complained loudly but are yet to submit votes:
- Ducky
- TSF
- melbourneboys
- notorganic

Why the fuck would I partake in an obviously corrupt process?

You can't prove the process is corrupt if you don't participate.

You've already admitted to ignoring votes from certain individuals, I don't need any more evidence.
notorganic
notorganic
Legend
Legend (21K reputation)Legend (21K reputation)Legend (21K reputation)Legend (21K reputation)Legend (21K reputation)Legend (21K reputation)Legend (21K reputation)Legend (21K reputation)Legend (21K reputation)Legend (21K reputation)Legend (21K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 21K, Visits: 0
#legitimacy
melbourneboys
melbourneboys
Rising Star
Rising Star (824 reputation)Rising Star (824 reputation)Rising Star (824 reputation)Rising Star (824 reputation)Rising Star (824 reputation)Rising Star (824 reputation)Rising Star (824 reputation)Rising Star (824 reputation)Rising Star (824 reputation)Rising Star (824 reputation)Rising Star (824 reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 810, Visits: 0
ducky42 wrote:
afromanGT wrote:
The following users have complained loudly but are yet to submit votes:
- Ducky
- TSF
- melbourneboys
- notorganic

Why the fuck would I partake in an obviously corrupt process?


+1
melbourneboys
melbourneboys
Rising Star
Rising Star (824 reputation)Rising Star (824 reputation)Rising Star (824 reputation)Rising Star (824 reputation)Rising Star (824 reputation)Rising Star (824 reputation)Rising Star (824 reputation)Rising Star (824 reputation)Rising Star (824 reputation)Rising Star (824 reputation)Rising Star (824 reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 810, Visits: 0
notorganic wrote:
#legitimacy


agreed
afromanGT
afromanGT
Legend
Legend (77K reputation)Legend (77K reputation)Legend (77K reputation)Legend (77K reputation)Legend (77K reputation)Legend (77K reputation)Legend (77K reputation)Legend (77K reputation)Legend (77K reputation)Legend (77K reputation)Legend (77K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 77K, Visits: 0
ducky42 wrote:
afromanGT wrote:
ducky42 wrote:
afromanGT wrote:
The following users have complained loudly but are yet to submit votes:
- Ducky
- TSF
- melbourneboys
- notorganic

Why the fuck would I partake in an obviously corrupt process?

You can't prove the process is corrupt if you don't participate.

You've already admitted to ignoring votes from certain individuals, I don't need any more evidence.

I've admitted to ignoring votes from three clear multi accounts (TGnamorfa, seventeen17 and eighteen18) from a specific individual trying to vote multiple times thus destroying the integrity of the process. So you see, contrary to the argument you're trying to make I've actually ensured the integrity of the voting process rather than allowing one individual to metaphorically stuff the ballot box.

Your move.
melbourneboys
melbourneboys
Rising Star
Rising Star (824 reputation)Rising Star (824 reputation)Rising Star (824 reputation)Rising Star (824 reputation)Rising Star (824 reputation)Rising Star (824 reputation)Rising Star (824 reputation)Rising Star (824 reputation)Rising Star (824 reputation)Rising Star (824 reputation)Rising Star (824 reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 810, Visits: 0
afromanGT wrote:
ducky42 wrote:
afromanGT wrote:
ducky42 wrote:
afromanGT wrote:
The following users have complained loudly but are yet to submit votes:
- Ducky
- TSF
- melbourneboys
- notorganic

Why the fuck would I partake in an obviously corrupt process?

You can't prove the process is corrupt if you don't participate.

You've already admitted to ignoring votes from certain individuals, I don't need any more evidence.

I've admitted to ignoring votes from three clear multi accounts (TGnamorfa, seventeen17 and eighteen18) from a specific individual trying to vote multiple times thus destroying the integrity of the process. So you see, contrary to the argument you're trying to make I've actually ensured the integrity of the voting process rather than allowing one individual to metaphorically stuff the ballot box.
Your move.


You'd think if anyone gave a fuck enough about your stupid awards enough to make multis to vote for me, They would actually vote as well with their own account. You're an idiot and that's your prerogative but I'll have no part in your bullshit awards. Stay tuned folks the real legitimately run awards are around the corner.
ducky42
ducky42
Pro
Pro (4.6K reputation)Pro (4.6K reputation)Pro (4.6K reputation)Pro (4.6K reputation)Pro (4.6K reputation)Pro (4.6K reputation)Pro (4.6K reputation)Pro (4.6K reputation)Pro (4.6K reputation)Pro (4.6K reputation)Pro (4.6K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 4.5K, Visits: 0
afromanGT wrote:
ducky42 wrote:
afromanGT wrote:
ducky42 wrote:
afromanGT wrote:
The following users have complained loudly but are yet to submit votes:
- Ducky
- TSF
- melbourneboys
- notorganic

Why the fuck would I partake in an obviously corrupt process?

You can't prove the process is corrupt if you don't participate.

You've already admitted to ignoring votes from certain individuals, I don't need any more evidence.

I've admitted to ignoring votes from three clear multi accounts (TGnamorfa, seventeen17 and eighteen18) from a specific individual trying to vote multiple times thus destroying the integrity of the process. So you see, contrary to the argument you're trying to make I've actually ensured the integrity of the voting process rather than allowing one individual to metaphorically stuff the ballot box.

Your move.

And on what basis have you proved the above accounts to be multis? You've already shown a bias against some forum users so I'm guessing they voted for the people you don't like, which is clearly enough evidence for someone like you to determine they must be multis.

It appears all interest has been lost in these awards. It's quite blatant the majority of the forum have lost all faith in your ability to run a transparent voting process.
ducky42
ducky42
Pro
Pro (4.6K reputation)Pro (4.6K reputation)Pro (4.6K reputation)Pro (4.6K reputation)Pro (4.6K reputation)Pro (4.6K reputation)Pro (4.6K reputation)Pro (4.6K reputation)Pro (4.6K reputation)Pro (4.6K reputation)Pro (4.6K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 4.5K, Visits: 0
melbourneboys wrote:
afromanGT wrote:
ducky42 wrote:
afromanGT wrote:
ducky42 wrote:
afromanGT wrote:
The following users have complained loudly but are yet to submit votes:
- Ducky
- TSF
- melbourneboys
- notorganic

Why the fuck would I partake in an obviously corrupt process?

You can't prove the process is corrupt if you don't participate.

You've already admitted to ignoring votes from certain individuals, I don't need any more evidence.

I've admitted to ignoring votes from three clear multi accounts (TGnamorfa, seventeen17 and eighteen18) from a specific individual trying to vote multiple times thus destroying the integrity of the process. So you see, contrary to the argument you're trying to make I've actually ensured the integrity of the voting process rather than allowing one individual to metaphorically stuff the ballot box.
Your move.


You'd think if anyone gave a fuck enough about your stupid awards enough to make multis to vote for me, They would actually vote as well with their own account. You're an idiot and that's your prerogative but I'll have no part in your bullshit awards. Stay tuned folks the real legitimately run awards are around the corner.

I can't wait.
afromanGT
afromanGT
Legend
Legend (77K reputation)Legend (77K reputation)Legend (77K reputation)Legend (77K reputation)Legend (77K reputation)Legend (77K reputation)Legend (77K reputation)Legend (77K reputation)Legend (77K reputation)Legend (77K reputation)Legend (77K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 77K, Visits: 0
ducky42 wrote:
afromanGT wrote:
ducky42 wrote:
afromanGT wrote:
ducky42 wrote:
afromanGT wrote:
The following users have complained loudly but are yet to submit votes:
- Ducky
- TSF
- melbourneboys
- notorganic

Why the fuck would I partake in an obviously corrupt process?

You can't prove the process is corrupt if you don't participate.

You've already admitted to ignoring votes from certain individuals, I don't need any more evidence.

I've admitted to ignoring votes from three clear multi accounts (TGnamorfa, seventeen17 and eighteen18) from a specific individual trying to vote multiple times thus destroying the integrity of the process. So you see, contrary to the argument you're trying to make I've actually ensured the integrity of the voting process rather than allowing one individual to metaphorically stuff the ballot box.

Your move.

And on what basis have you proved the above accounts to be multis? You've already shown a bias against some forum users so I'm guessing they voted for the people you don't like, which is clearly enough evidence for someone like you to determine they must be multis.

It appears all interest has been lost in these awards. It's quite blatant the majority of the forum have lost all faith in your ability to run a transparent voting process.

What basis? One's my username backwards and which the mods banned for being a melbourneboys multi. The other two are purely numbers that don't have a single post to their name, joined the same day they voted and voted within minutes of each other.
notorganic
notorganic
Legend
Legend (21K reputation)Legend (21K reputation)Legend (21K reputation)Legend (21K reputation)Legend (21K reputation)Legend (21K reputation)Legend (21K reputation)Legend (21K reputation)Legend (21K reputation)Legend (21K reputation)Legend (21K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 21K, Visits: 0
afromanGT wrote:
ducky42 wrote:
afromanGT wrote:
ducky42 wrote:
afromanGT wrote:
ducky42 wrote:
afromanGT wrote:
The following users have complained loudly but are yet to submit votes:
- Ducky
- TSF
- melbourneboys
- notorganic

Why the fuck would I partake in an obviously corrupt process?

You can't prove the process is corrupt if you don't participate.

You've already admitted to ignoring votes from certain individuals, I don't need any more evidence.

I've admitted to ignoring votes from three clear multi accounts (TGnamorfa, seventeen17 and eighteen18) from a specific individual trying to vote multiple times thus destroying the integrity of the process. So you see, contrary to the argument you're trying to make I've actually ensured the integrity of the voting process rather than allowing one individual to metaphorically stuff the ballot box.

Your move.

And on what basis have you proved the above accounts to be multis? You've already shown a bias against some forum users so I'm guessing they voted for the people you don't like, which is clearly enough evidence for someone like you to determine they must be multis.

It appears all interest has been lost in these awards. It's quite blatant the majority of the forum have lost all faith in your ability to run a transparent voting process.

What basis? One's my username backwards and which the mods banned for being a melbourneboys multi. The other two are purely numbers that don't have a single post to their name, joined the same day they voted and voted within minutes of each other.

Doesn't matter, by selectively taking votes from some and not others you have exposed yourself to being what many on the forum have suspected you of for years. You cannot be trusted with something as vitally important as the End Of Year Awards without some very transparent measures of checks and balances such as giving me your password.
afromanGT
afromanGT
Legend
Legend (77K reputation)Legend (77K reputation)Legend (77K reputation)Legend (77K reputation)Legend (77K reputation)Legend (77K reputation)Legend (77K reputation)Legend (77K reputation)Legend (77K reputation)Legend (77K reputation)Legend (77K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 77K, Visits: 0
#-o
TheSelectFew
TheSelectFew
Legend
Legend (30K reputation)Legend (30K reputation)Legend (30K reputation)Legend (30K reputation)Legend (30K reputation)Legend (30K reputation)Legend (30K reputation)Legend (30K reputation)Legend (30K reputation)Legend (30K reputation)Legend (30K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 30K, Visits: 0
Afroman you have to be the dumbest Cnut on this forum. I nominate you for that.


afromanGT
afromanGT
Legend
Legend (77K reputation)Legend (77K reputation)Legend (77K reputation)Legend (77K reputation)Legend (77K reputation)Legend (77K reputation)Legend (77K reputation)Legend (77K reputation)Legend (77K reputation)Legend (77K reputation)Legend (77K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 77K, Visits: 0
TheSelectFew wrote:
Afroman you have to be the dumbest Cnut on this forum. I nominate you for that.

I'm flattered, but it would be rude of me to take that award off you.
Roar_Brisbane
Roar_Brisbane
Legend
Legend (14K reputation)Legend (14K reputation)Legend (14K reputation)Legend (14K reputation)Legend (14K reputation)Legend (14K reputation)Legend (14K reputation)Legend (14K reputation)Legend (14K reputation)Legend (14K reputation)Legend (14K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 14K, Visits: 0
afromanGT wrote:
TheSelectFew wrote:
Afroman you have to be the dumbest Cnut on this forum. I nominate you for that.

I'm flattered, but it would be rude of me to take that award off you.

#legitimacy
A16Man
A16Man
World Class
World Class (5.3K reputation)World Class (5.3K reputation)World Class (5.3K reputation)World Class (5.3K reputation)World Class (5.3K reputation)World Class (5.3K reputation)World Class (5.3K reputation)World Class (5.3K reputation)World Class (5.3K reputation)World Class (5.3K reputation)World Class (5.3K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 5.2K, Visits: 0
Stop all this fighting guys :cry:


ducky42
ducky42
Pro
Pro (4.6K reputation)Pro (4.6K reputation)Pro (4.6K reputation)Pro (4.6K reputation)Pro (4.6K reputation)Pro (4.6K reputation)Pro (4.6K reputation)Pro (4.6K reputation)Pro (4.6K reputation)Pro (4.6K reputation)Pro (4.6K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 4.5K, Visits: 0
afromanGT wrote:
ducky42 wrote:
afromanGT wrote:
ducky42 wrote:
afromanGT wrote:
ducky42 wrote:
afromanGT wrote:
The following users have complained loudly but are yet to submit votes:
- Ducky
- TSF
- melbourneboys
- notorganic

Why the fuck would I partake in an obviously corrupt process?

You can't prove the process is corrupt if you don't participate.

You've already admitted to ignoring votes from certain individuals, I don't need any more evidence.

I've admitted to ignoring votes from three clear multi accounts (TGnamorfa, seventeen17 and eighteen18) from a specific individual trying to vote multiple times thus destroying the integrity of the process. So you see, contrary to the argument you're trying to make I've actually ensured the integrity of the voting process rather than allowing one individual to metaphorically stuff the ballot box.

Your move.

And on what basis have you proved the above accounts to be multis? You've already shown a bias against some forum users so I'm guessing they voted for the people you don't like, which is clearly enough evidence for someone like you to determine they must be multis.

It appears all interest has been lost in these awards. It's quite blatant the majority of the forum have lost all faith in your ability to run a transparent voting process.

What basis? One's my username backwards and which the mods banned for being a melbourneboys multi. The other two are purely numbers that don't have a single post to their name, joined the same day they voted and voted within minutes of each other.

Looks like one big coincidence to me, especially given that you've presented no evidence to prove the multi status of the users in question.

I advise that you include the votes of these new forumers to properly reflect the 442 community.
ducky42
ducky42
Pro
Pro (4.6K reputation)Pro (4.6K reputation)Pro (4.6K reputation)Pro (4.6K reputation)Pro (4.6K reputation)Pro (4.6K reputation)Pro (4.6K reputation)Pro (4.6K reputation)Pro (4.6K reputation)Pro (4.6K reputation)Pro (4.6K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 4.5K, Visits: 0
TheSelectFew wrote:
Afroman you have to be the dumbest Cnut on this forum. I nominate you for that.

afromanGT
afromanGT
Legend
Legend (77K reputation)Legend (77K reputation)Legend (77K reputation)Legend (77K reputation)Legend (77K reputation)Legend (77K reputation)Legend (77K reputation)Legend (77K reputation)Legend (77K reputation)Legend (77K reputation)Legend (77K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 77K, Visits: 0
Quote:
I advise that you include the votes of these new forumers to properly reflect the 442 community.

It doesn't reflect the community if they haven't made a single post.
ducky42
ducky42
Pro
Pro (4.6K reputation)Pro (4.6K reputation)Pro (4.6K reputation)Pro (4.6K reputation)Pro (4.6K reputation)Pro (4.6K reputation)Pro (4.6K reputation)Pro (4.6K reputation)Pro (4.6K reputation)Pro (4.6K reputation)Pro (4.6K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 4.5K, Visits: 0
afromanGT wrote:
Quote:
I advise that you include the votes of these new forumers to properly reflect the 442 community.

It doesn't reflect the community if they haven't made a single post.

That's not your decision to make.
afromanGT
afromanGT
Legend
Legend (77K reputation)Legend (77K reputation)Legend (77K reputation)Legend (77K reputation)Legend (77K reputation)Legend (77K reputation)Legend (77K reputation)Legend (77K reputation)Legend (77K reputation)Legend (77K reputation)Legend (77K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 77K, Visits: 0
ducky42 wrote:
afromanGT wrote:
Quote:
I advise that you include the votes of these new forumers to properly reflect the 442 community.

It doesn't reflect the community if they haven't made a single post.

That's not your decision to make.

That's rich coming from you.
Heineken
Heineken
Legend
Legend (50K reputation)Legend (50K reputation)Legend (50K reputation)Legend (50K reputation)Legend (50K reputation)Legend (50K reputation)Legend (50K reputation)Legend (50K reputation)Legend (50K reputation)Legend (50K reputation)Legend (50K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 49K, Visits: 0
afromanGT wrote:
TheSelectFew wrote:
Afroman you have to be the dumbest Cnut on this forum. I nominate you for that.

I'm flattered, but it would be rude of me to take that award off you.

#facts #burn #joininginonthehashtagandwagon

WOLLONGONG WOLVES FOR A-LEAGUE EXPANSION!

ducky42
ducky42
Pro
Pro (4.6K reputation)Pro (4.6K reputation)Pro (4.6K reputation)Pro (4.6K reputation)Pro (4.6K reputation)Pro (4.6K reputation)Pro (4.6K reputation)Pro (4.6K reputation)Pro (4.6K reputation)Pro (4.6K reputation)Pro (4.6K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 4.5K, Visits: 0
#legitimacy

Edited by ducky42: 10/12/2013 08:56:46 PM
ducky42
ducky42
Pro
Pro (4.6K reputation)Pro (4.6K reputation)Pro (4.6K reputation)Pro (4.6K reputation)Pro (4.6K reputation)Pro (4.6K reputation)Pro (4.6K reputation)Pro (4.6K reputation)Pro (4.6K reputation)Pro (4.6K reputation)Pro (4.6K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 4.5K, Visits: 0
afromanGT wrote:
ducky42 wrote:
afromanGT wrote:
Quote:
I advise that you include the votes of these new forumers to properly reflect the 442 community.

It doesn't reflect the community if they haven't made a single post.

That's not your decision to make.

That's rich coming from you.

Oh, ok. That justifies your reason to make and use assumptions as a pathetic reason to ignore votes and fuel your own agenda.

Good job.

Edited by ducky42: 10/12/2013 08:57:49 PM
paulbagzFC
paulbagzFC
Legend
Legend (45K reputation)Legend (45K reputation)Legend (45K reputation)Legend (45K reputation)Legend (45K reputation)Legend (45K reputation)Legend (45K reputation)Legend (45K reputation)Legend (45K reputation)Legend (45K reputation)Legend (45K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 44K, Visits: 0
I hope I win :)

-PB

https://i.imgur.com/batge7K.jpg

melbourneboys
melbourneboys
Rising Star
Rising Star (824 reputation)Rising Star (824 reputation)Rising Star (824 reputation)Rising Star (824 reputation)Rising Star (824 reputation)Rising Star (824 reputation)Rising Star (824 reputation)Rising Star (824 reputation)Rising Star (824 reputation)Rising Star (824 reputation)Rising Star (824 reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 810, Visits: 0
Afroman is clearly a PB multi FOAD
Socceroofan4life
Socceroofan4life
Pro
Pro (4.6K reputation)Pro (4.6K reputation)Pro (4.6K reputation)Pro (4.6K reputation)Pro (4.6K reputation)Pro (4.6K reputation)Pro (4.6K reputation)Pro (4.6K reputation)Pro (4.6K reputation)Pro (4.6K reputation)Pro (4.6K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 4.3K, Visits: 0
melbourneboys wrote:
Afroman is clearly a PB multi FOAD


:^o
paladisious
paladisious
Legend
Legend (40K reputation)Legend (40K reputation)Legend (40K reputation)Legend (40K reputation)Legend (40K reputation)Legend (40K reputation)Legend (40K reputation)Legend (40K reputation)Legend (40K reputation)Legend (40K reputation)Legend (40K reputation)

Group: Moderators
Posts: 39K, Visits: 0
A16Man wrote:
Stop all this fighting guys :cry:



Fuck that shit, keep fighting!


paladisious
paladisious
Legend
Legend (40K reputation)Legend (40K reputation)Legend (40K reputation)Legend (40K reputation)Legend (40K reputation)Legend (40K reputation)Legend (40K reputation)Legend (40K reputation)Legend (40K reputation)Legend (40K reputation)Legend (40K reputation)

Group: Moderators
Posts: 39K, Visits: 0
paulbagzFC wrote:
I hope I win :)

-PB




Edited by paladisious: 11/12/2013 02:37:08 AM
afromanGT
afromanGT
Legend
Legend (77K reputation)Legend (77K reputation)Legend (77K reputation)Legend (77K reputation)Legend (77K reputation)Legend (77K reputation)Legend (77K reputation)Legend (77K reputation)Legend (77K reputation)Legend (77K reputation)Legend (77K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 77K, Visits: 0
ducky42 wrote:
afromanGT wrote:
ducky42 wrote:
afromanGT wrote:
Quote:
I advise that you include the votes of these new forumers to properly reflect the 442 community.

It doesn't reflect the community if they haven't made a single post.

That's not your decision to make.

That's rich coming from you.

Oh, ok. That justifies your reason to make and use assumptions as a pathetic reason to ignore votes and fuel your own agenda.

Good job.

Edited by ducky42: 10/12/2013 08:57:49 PM

There are enough congruent coincidences to be upheld in a court of law. I'm pretty comfortable with the decision I've made. And since the only people who have a problem with it are people who have had a problem with literally EVERY. SINGLE. THING. I'm not inclined to hold their vote - which was for one award - in any more regard than being fit for the rubbish bin.
GO


Select a Forum....























Inside Sport


Search