afromanGT
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 77K,
Visits: 0
|
ducky42 wrote:afromanGT wrote:The following users have complained loudly but are yet to submit votes: - Ducky - TSF - melbourneboys - notorganic Why the fuck would I partake in an obviously corrupt process? You can't prove the process is corrupt if you don't participate.
|
|
|
|
ducky42
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 4.5K,
Visits: 0
|
afromanGT wrote:ducky42 wrote:afromanGT wrote:The following users have complained loudly but are yet to submit votes: - Ducky - TSF - melbourneboys - notorganic Why the fuck would I partake in an obviously corrupt process? You can't prove the process is corrupt if you don't participate. You've already admitted to ignoring votes from certain individuals, I don't need any more evidence.
|
|
|
notorganic
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 21K,
Visits: 0
|
#legitimacy
|
|
|
melbourneboys
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 810,
Visits: 0
|
ducky42 wrote:afromanGT wrote:The following users have complained loudly but are yet to submit votes: - Ducky - TSF - melbourneboys - notorganic Why the fuck would I partake in an obviously corrupt process? +1
|
|
|
melbourneboys
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 810,
Visits: 0
|
notorganic wrote:#legitimacy agreed
|
|
|
afromanGT
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 77K,
Visits: 0
|
ducky42 wrote:afromanGT wrote:ducky42 wrote:afromanGT wrote:The following users have complained loudly but are yet to submit votes: - Ducky - TSF - melbourneboys - notorganic Why the fuck would I partake in an obviously corrupt process? You can't prove the process is corrupt if you don't participate. You've already admitted to ignoring votes from certain individuals, I don't need any more evidence. I've admitted to ignoring votes from three clear multi accounts (TGnamorfa, seventeen17 and eighteen18) from a specific individual trying to vote multiple times thus destroying the integrity of the process. So you see, contrary to the argument you're trying to make I've actually ensured the integrity of the voting process rather than allowing one individual to metaphorically stuff the ballot box. Your move.
|
|
|
melbourneboys
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 810,
Visits: 0
|
afromanGT wrote:ducky42 wrote:afromanGT wrote:ducky42 wrote:afromanGT wrote:The following users have complained loudly but are yet to submit votes: - Ducky - TSF - melbourneboys - notorganic Why the fuck would I partake in an obviously corrupt process? You can't prove the process is corrupt if you don't participate. You've already admitted to ignoring votes from certain individuals, I don't need any more evidence. I've admitted to ignoring votes from three clear multi accounts (TGnamorfa, seventeen17 and eighteen18) from a specific individual trying to vote multiple times thus destroying the integrity of the process. So you see, contrary to the argument you're trying to make I've actually ensured the integrity of the voting process rather than allowing one individual to metaphorically stuff the ballot box. Your move. You'd think if anyone gave a fuck enough about your stupid awards enough to make multis to vote for me, They would actually vote as well with their own account. You're an idiot and that's your prerogative but I'll have no part in your bullshit awards. Stay tuned folks the real legitimately run awards are around the corner.
|
|
|
ducky42
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 4.5K,
Visits: 0
|
afromanGT wrote:ducky42 wrote:afromanGT wrote:ducky42 wrote:afromanGT wrote:The following users have complained loudly but are yet to submit votes: - Ducky - TSF - melbourneboys - notorganic Why the fuck would I partake in an obviously corrupt process? You can't prove the process is corrupt if you don't participate. You've already admitted to ignoring votes from certain individuals, I don't need any more evidence. I've admitted to ignoring votes from three clear multi accounts (TGnamorfa, seventeen17 and eighteen18) from a specific individual trying to vote multiple times thus destroying the integrity of the process. So you see, contrary to the argument you're trying to make I've actually ensured the integrity of the voting process rather than allowing one individual to metaphorically stuff the ballot box. Your move. And on what basis have you proved the above accounts to be multis? You've already shown a bias against some forum users so I'm guessing they voted for the people you don't like, which is clearly enough evidence for someone like you to determine they must be multis. It appears all interest has been lost in these awards. It's quite blatant the majority of the forum have lost all faith in your ability to run a transparent voting process.
|
|
|
ducky42
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 4.5K,
Visits: 0
|
melbourneboys wrote:afromanGT wrote:ducky42 wrote:afromanGT wrote:ducky42 wrote:afromanGT wrote:The following users have complained loudly but are yet to submit votes: - Ducky - TSF - melbourneboys - notorganic Why the fuck would I partake in an obviously corrupt process? You can't prove the process is corrupt if you don't participate. You've already admitted to ignoring votes from certain individuals, I don't need any more evidence. I've admitted to ignoring votes from three clear multi accounts (TGnamorfa, seventeen17 and eighteen18) from a specific individual trying to vote multiple times thus destroying the integrity of the process. So you see, contrary to the argument you're trying to make I've actually ensured the integrity of the voting process rather than allowing one individual to metaphorically stuff the ballot box. Your move. You'd think if anyone gave a fuck enough about your stupid awards enough to make multis to vote for me, They would actually vote as well with their own account. You're an idiot and that's your prerogative but I'll have no part in your bullshit awards. Stay tuned folks the real legitimately run awards are around the corner. I can't wait.
|
|
|
afromanGT
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 77K,
Visits: 0
|
ducky42 wrote:afromanGT wrote:ducky42 wrote:afromanGT wrote:ducky42 wrote:afromanGT wrote:The following users have complained loudly but are yet to submit votes: - Ducky - TSF - melbourneboys - notorganic Why the fuck would I partake in an obviously corrupt process? You can't prove the process is corrupt if you don't participate. You've already admitted to ignoring votes from certain individuals, I don't need any more evidence. I've admitted to ignoring votes from three clear multi accounts (TGnamorfa, seventeen17 and eighteen18) from a specific individual trying to vote multiple times thus destroying the integrity of the process. So you see, contrary to the argument you're trying to make I've actually ensured the integrity of the voting process rather than allowing one individual to metaphorically stuff the ballot box. Your move. And on what basis have you proved the above accounts to be multis? You've already shown a bias against some forum users so I'm guessing they voted for the people you don't like, which is clearly enough evidence for someone like you to determine they must be multis. It appears all interest has been lost in these awards. It's quite blatant the majority of the forum have lost all faith in your ability to run a transparent voting process. What basis? One's my username backwards and which the mods banned for being a melbourneboys multi. The other two are purely numbers that don't have a single post to their name, joined the same day they voted and voted within minutes of each other.
|
|
|
notorganic
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 21K,
Visits: 0
|
afromanGT wrote:ducky42 wrote:afromanGT wrote:ducky42 wrote:afromanGT wrote:ducky42 wrote:afromanGT wrote:The following users have complained loudly but are yet to submit votes: - Ducky - TSF - melbourneboys - notorganic Why the fuck would I partake in an obviously corrupt process? You can't prove the process is corrupt if you don't participate. You've already admitted to ignoring votes from certain individuals, I don't need any more evidence. I've admitted to ignoring votes from three clear multi accounts (TGnamorfa, seventeen17 and eighteen18) from a specific individual trying to vote multiple times thus destroying the integrity of the process. So you see, contrary to the argument you're trying to make I've actually ensured the integrity of the voting process rather than allowing one individual to metaphorically stuff the ballot box. Your move. And on what basis have you proved the above accounts to be multis? You've already shown a bias against some forum users so I'm guessing they voted for the people you don't like, which is clearly enough evidence for someone like you to determine they must be multis. It appears all interest has been lost in these awards. It's quite blatant the majority of the forum have lost all faith in your ability to run a transparent voting process. What basis? One's my username backwards and which the mods banned for being a melbourneboys multi. The other two are purely numbers that don't have a single post to their name, joined the same day they voted and voted within minutes of each other. Doesn't matter, by selectively taking votes from some and not others you have exposed yourself to being what many on the forum have suspected you of for years. You cannot be trusted with something as vitally important as the End Of Year Awards without some very transparent measures of checks and balances such as giving me your password.
|
|
|
afromanGT
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 77K,
Visits: 0
|
#-o
|
|
|
TheSelectFew
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 30K,
Visits: 0
|
Afroman you have to be the dumbest Cnut on this forum. I nominate you for that.
|
|
|
afromanGT
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 77K,
Visits: 0
|
TheSelectFew wrote:Afroman you have to be the dumbest Cnut on this forum. I nominate you for that. I'm flattered, but it would be rude of me to take that award off you.
|
|
|
Roar_Brisbane
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 14K,
Visits: 0
|
afromanGT wrote:TheSelectFew wrote:Afroman you have to be the dumbest Cnut on this forum. I nominate you for that. I'm flattered, but it would be rude of me to take that award off you. #legitimacy
|
|
|
A16Man
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 5.2K,
Visits: 0
|
Stop all this fighting guys :cry:
|
|
|
ducky42
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 4.5K,
Visits: 0
|
afromanGT wrote:ducky42 wrote:afromanGT wrote:ducky42 wrote:afromanGT wrote:ducky42 wrote:afromanGT wrote:The following users have complained loudly but are yet to submit votes: - Ducky - TSF - melbourneboys - notorganic Why the fuck would I partake in an obviously corrupt process? You can't prove the process is corrupt if you don't participate. You've already admitted to ignoring votes from certain individuals, I don't need any more evidence. I've admitted to ignoring votes from three clear multi accounts (TGnamorfa, seventeen17 and eighteen18) from a specific individual trying to vote multiple times thus destroying the integrity of the process. So you see, contrary to the argument you're trying to make I've actually ensured the integrity of the voting process rather than allowing one individual to metaphorically stuff the ballot box. Your move. And on what basis have you proved the above accounts to be multis? You've already shown a bias against some forum users so I'm guessing they voted for the people you don't like, which is clearly enough evidence for someone like you to determine they must be multis. It appears all interest has been lost in these awards. It's quite blatant the majority of the forum have lost all faith in your ability to run a transparent voting process. What basis? One's my username backwards and which the mods banned for being a melbourneboys multi. The other two are purely numbers that don't have a single post to their name, joined the same day they voted and voted within minutes of each other. Looks like one big coincidence to me, especially given that you've presented no evidence to prove the multi status of the users in question. I advise that you include the votes of these new forumers to properly reflect the 442 community.
|
|
|
ducky42
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 4.5K,
Visits: 0
|
TheSelectFew wrote:Afroman you have to be the dumbest Cnut on this forum. I nominate you for that.
|
|
|
afromanGT
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 77K,
Visits: 0
|
Quote:I advise that you include the votes of these new forumers to properly reflect the 442 community. It doesn't reflect the community if they haven't made a single post.
|
|
|
ducky42
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 4.5K,
Visits: 0
|
afromanGT wrote:Quote:I advise that you include the votes of these new forumers to properly reflect the 442 community. It doesn't reflect the community if they haven't made a single post. That's not your decision to make.
|
|
|
afromanGT
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 77K,
Visits: 0
|
ducky42 wrote:afromanGT wrote:Quote:I advise that you include the votes of these new forumers to properly reflect the 442 community. It doesn't reflect the community if they haven't made a single post. That's not your decision to make. That's rich coming from you.
|
|
|
Heineken
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 49K,
Visits: 0
|
afromanGT wrote:TheSelectFew wrote:Afroman you have to be the dumbest Cnut on this forum. I nominate you for that. I'm flattered, but it would be rude of me to take that award off you. #facts #burn #joininginonthehashtagandwagon
WOLLONGONG WOLVES FOR A-LEAGUE EXPANSION!

|
|
|
ducky42
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 4.5K,
Visits: 0
|
#legitimacy
Edited by ducky42: 10/12/2013 08:56:46 PM
|
|
|
ducky42
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 4.5K,
Visits: 0
|
afromanGT wrote:ducky42 wrote:afromanGT wrote:Quote:I advise that you include the votes of these new forumers to properly reflect the 442 community. It doesn't reflect the community if they haven't made a single post. That's not your decision to make. That's rich coming from you. Oh, ok. That justifies your reason to make and use assumptions as a pathetic reason to ignore votes and fuel your own agenda. Good job. Edited by ducky42: 10/12/2013 08:57:49 PM
|
|
|
paulbagzFC
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 44K,
Visits: 0
|
|
|
|
melbourneboys
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 810,
Visits: 0
|
Afroman is clearly a PB multi FOAD
|
|
|
Socceroofan4life
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 4.3K,
Visits: 0
|
melbourneboys wrote:Afroman is clearly a PB multi FOAD :^o
|
|
|
paladisious
|
|
Group: Moderators
Posts: 39K,
Visits: 0
|
A16Man wrote:Stop all this fighting guys :cry:  Fuck that shit, keep fighting!
|
|
|
paladisious
|
|
Group: Moderators
Posts: 39K,
Visits: 0
|
paulbagzFC wrote:I hope I win :)
-PB Edited by paladisious: 11/12/2013 02:37:08 AM
|
|
|
afromanGT
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 77K,
Visits: 0
|
ducky42 wrote:afromanGT wrote:ducky42 wrote:afromanGT wrote:Quote:I advise that you include the votes of these new forumers to properly reflect the 442 community. It doesn't reflect the community if they haven't made a single post. That's not your decision to make. That's rich coming from you. Oh, ok. That justifies your reason to make and use assumptions as a pathetic reason to ignore votes and fuel your own agenda. Good job. Edited by ducky42: 10/12/2013 08:57:49 PM There are enough congruent coincidences to be upheld in a court of law. I'm pretty comfortable with the decision I've made. And since the only people who have a problem with it are people who have had a problem with literally EVERY. SINGLE. THING. I'm not inclined to hold their vote - which was for one award - in any more regard than being fit for the rubbish bin.
|
|
|