But that's the 21st century for you. You have to upgrade in order to attract good events even if it comes at the cost of demolishing what was there before.

It has happened for the past 3 years. It's usually Cantebury and some red & white mob ( St. George? )
There has also has been talk for many years now about re-enstating the Adelaide Rams franchise,

But really someone hasn't done their homework, it's been discussed on here before that by blocking in the corners major roads are affected as is land, Plus a 50% clouded roof in our climate would really play havoc with the grass + make the inside like a sauna.

Clearly you needed this:

Quick question, have you ever been to an Adelaide game?

:lol: :lol: :lol: Love it

A covered roof? Why do you need to cover a roof? It's a roof.

I, personally, have no problem with it.

CLASSIC! =d> =d> =d> =d> I genuinely laughed out loud!

Hmm yeah, improve the facilities and provide a well-designed roof for the ground's lay out and orientation and perhaps leave capacity there for the stadium's eventual greater capacity upgrade to 25k... but the current capacity is well sufficient and perhaps a slight bump up by 1-2k would be well sufficient, but no more than that.

Upgrade the facilities, make the stadium experience more comfortable and even accessible for all spectators, see the attendance of primary tenants Adelaide United slowly increase and like the Wanderers-model, let scarcity build, demand start to seriously push/exceed supply, and THEN seriously pursue greater expansion.



Indeed. :/



Hehe less the roof is covered... in terms of costs? Or, that roof is covered by insurance? :p

Edited by GloryPerth: 19/2/2014 03:20:56 AM