Putin ready to invade Ukraine; Kiev warns of war


Putin ready to invade Ukraine; Kiev warns of war

Author
Message
afromanGT
afromanGT
Legend
Legend (77K reputation)Legend (77K reputation)Legend (77K reputation)Legend (77K reputation)Legend (77K reputation)Legend (77K reputation)Legend (77K reputation)Legend (77K reputation)Legend (77K reputation)Legend (77K reputation)Legend (77K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 77K, Visits: 0
Scoll wrote:
afromanGT wrote:
Aside from principle and a sense of loyalty to expats, Russia has very little to gain from full scale conflict in Ukraine - they're an import economy which owes Gazprom $2.2bn. About all Russia has to benefit from annexing Ukraine is their metal industry.

Crimea was important for its port and gas line. Beyond that I don't imagine Russia much care either way what happens to the rest of Ukraine.

Russia already has a port at Rostov. However, 66% of Russia's natural gas exported to the EU passes through Crimea, and if they were to capture Donetsk it would increase Russia's Iron and Steel production by nearly 50%.
Heineken
Heineken
Legend
Legend (50K reputation)Legend (50K reputation)Legend (50K reputation)Legend (50K reputation)Legend (50K reputation)Legend (50K reputation)Legend (50K reputation)Legend (50K reputation)Legend (50K reputation)Legend (50K reputation)Legend (50K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 49K, Visits: 0
A lot of similarities to this by Russia with what they did with Georgia & South Ossetia. Vladamir Putin trying to flex his muscles.

WOLLONGONG WOLVES FOR A-LEAGUE EXPANSION!

thupercoach
thupercoach
World Class
World Class (8.4K reputation)World Class (8.4K reputation)World Class (8.4K reputation)World Class (8.4K reputation)World Class (8.4K reputation)World Class (8.4K reputation)World Class (8.4K reputation)World Class (8.4K reputation)World Class (8.4K reputation)World Class (8.4K reputation)World Class (8.4K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 8.3K, Visits: 0
Heineken wrote:
A lot of similarities to this by Russia with what they did with Georgia & South Ossetia. Vladamir Putin trying to flex his muscles.
Oh yeah.
ricecrackers
ricecrackers
Pro
Pro (3.5K reputation)Pro (3.5K reputation)Pro (3.5K reputation)Pro (3.5K reputation)Pro (3.5K reputation)Pro (3.5K reputation)Pro (3.5K reputation)Pro (3.5K reputation)Pro (3.5K reputation)Pro (3.5K reputation)Pro (3.5K reputation)

Group: Banned Members
Posts: 3.5K, Visits: 0
afromanGT wrote:
ricecrackers wrote:
afromanGT wrote:
ricecrackers wrote:
no idea :roll:

Quality contribution.


"Germany need to mobilise their armies"

what have you been smoking :oops:

With the majority of Europe currently relying on Germany for economic stability, they basically determine the stance and course of action for the entire continent. On top of that they have one of Europe's elite armed forces, if they mobilize in the Ukraine to keep the peace, Russia won't risk full scale military conflict against what will in reality become the majority of Europe.

Aside from principle and a sense of loyalty to expats, Russia has very little to gain from full scale conflict in Ukraine - they're an import economy which owes Gazprom $2.2bn. About all Russia has to benefit from annexing Ukraine is their metal industry.


you really dont have a clue what you're talking about.

do you remember the last time Germany engaged Russia in military conflict? how did that turn out?

do you realise who it was that encouraged the regime change in Ukraine? ie who caused it

do you understand the hypocrisy of Kerry's position regarding peaceful protesters in Eastern Ukraine when he supported violent protesters in Kiev and Lviv?

do you think Russia is the aggressor here when they were previously satisfied with the arrangement with Ukraine which has since entered an agreement with NATO under US pressure?

do you realise that ethnic Russians are now being targeted by fascist thugs?
afromanGT
afromanGT
Legend
Legend (77K reputation)Legend (77K reputation)Legend (77K reputation)Legend (77K reputation)Legend (77K reputation)Legend (77K reputation)Legend (77K reputation)Legend (77K reputation)Legend (77K reputation)Legend (77K reputation)Legend (77K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 77K, Visits: 0
Quote:
do you remember the last time Germany engaged Russia in military conflict? how did that turn out?

You do realise that was in the middle of winter in a heavily fortified Moscow where Russia had superior troop numbers?
Quote:
do you think Russia is the aggressor here

Russian troops on non-russian soil. Yes, that much is bleedingly fucking obvious.
Quote:
do you realise that ethnic Russians are now being targeted by fascist thugs?

You do realise that those conflicts go both ways and Ukranian loyalists have been victims of violence as well?
ricecrackers
ricecrackers
Pro
Pro (3.5K reputation)Pro (3.5K reputation)Pro (3.5K reputation)Pro (3.5K reputation)Pro (3.5K reputation)Pro (3.5K reputation)Pro (3.5K reputation)Pro (3.5K reputation)Pro (3.5K reputation)Pro (3.5K reputation)Pro (3.5K reputation)

Group: Banned Members
Posts: 3.5K, Visits: 0
afromanGT wrote:
Quote:
do you remember the last time Germany engaged Russia in military conflict? how did that turn out?

You do realise that was in the middle of winter in a heavily fortified Moscow where Russia had superior troop numbers?
Quote:
do you think Russia is the aggressor here

Russian troops on non-russian soil. Yes, that much is bleedingly fucking obvious.
Quote:
do you realise that ethnic Russians are now being targeted by fascist thugs?

You do realise that those conflicts go both ways and Ukranian loyalists have been victims of violence as well?


I didnt realise Russia had invaded Ukraine. care to provide some evidence?
afromanGT
afromanGT
Legend
Legend (77K reputation)Legend (77K reputation)Legend (77K reputation)Legend (77K reputation)Legend (77K reputation)Legend (77K reputation)Legend (77K reputation)Legend (77K reputation)Legend (77K reputation)Legend (77K reputation)Legend (77K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 77K, Visits: 0
ricecrackers wrote:
afromanGT wrote:
Quote:
do you remember the last time Germany engaged Russia in military conflict? how did that turn out?

You do realise that was in the middle of winter in a heavily fortified Moscow where Russia had superior troop numbers?
Quote:
do you think Russia is the aggressor here

Russian troops on non-russian soil. Yes, that much is bleedingly fucking obvious.
Quote:
do you realise that ethnic Russians are now being targeted by fascist thugs?

You do realise that those conflicts go both ways and Ukranian loyalists have been victims of violence as well?


I didnt realise Russia had invaded Ukraine. care to provide some evidence?

Russian troops were in Sevastopol before the 'referendum'.
humbert
humbert
Semi-Pro
Semi-Pro (1.7K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.7K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.7K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.7K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.7K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.7K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.7K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.7K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.7K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.7K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.7K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 1.6K, Visits: 0
ricecrackers wrote:
afromanGT wrote:
Quote:
do you remember the last time Germany engaged Russia in military conflict? how did that turn out?

You do realise that was in the middle of winter in a heavily fortified Moscow where Russia had superior troop numbers?
Quote:
do you think Russia is the aggressor here

Russian troops on non-russian soil. Yes, that much is bleedingly fucking obvious.
Quote:
do you realise that ethnic Russians are now being targeted by fascist thugs?

You do realise that those conflicts go both ways and Ukranian loyalists have been victims of violence as well?


I didnt realise Russia had invaded Ukraine. care to provide some evidence?


You indict yourself by your own stupidity. One need not say more.

Edited by humbert: 10/4/2014 11:44:23 PM
ricecrackers
ricecrackers
Pro
Pro (3.5K reputation)Pro (3.5K reputation)Pro (3.5K reputation)Pro (3.5K reputation)Pro (3.5K reputation)Pro (3.5K reputation)Pro (3.5K reputation)Pro (3.5K reputation)Pro (3.5K reputation)Pro (3.5K reputation)Pro (3.5K reputation)

Group: Banned Members
Posts: 3.5K, Visits: 0
afromanGT wrote:
ricecrackers wrote:
afromanGT wrote:
Quote:
do you remember the last time Germany engaged Russia in military conflict? how did that turn out?

You do realise that was in the middle of winter in a heavily fortified Moscow where Russia had superior troop numbers?
Quote:
do you think Russia is the aggressor here

Russian troops on non-russian soil. Yes, that much is bleedingly fucking obvious.
Quote:
do you realise that ethnic Russians are now being targeted by fascist thugs?

You do realise that those conflicts go both ways and Ukranian loyalists have been victims of violence as well?


I didnt realise Russia had invaded Ukraine. care to provide some evidence?

Russian troops were in Sevastopol before the 'referendum'.


they have a naval base there as well as long standing contract that they could station up to 25,000 troops in Crimea, of which they did not transgress

now about that evidence, got any?
ricecrackers
ricecrackers
Pro
Pro (3.5K reputation)Pro (3.5K reputation)Pro (3.5K reputation)Pro (3.5K reputation)Pro (3.5K reputation)Pro (3.5K reputation)Pro (3.5K reputation)Pro (3.5K reputation)Pro (3.5K reputation)Pro (3.5K reputation)Pro (3.5K reputation)

Group: Banned Members
Posts: 3.5K, Visits: 0
humbert wrote:
ricecrackers wrote:
afromanGT wrote:
Quote:
do you remember the last time Germany engaged Russia in military conflict? how did that turn out?

You do realise that was in the middle of winter in a heavily fortified Moscow where Russia had superior troop numbers?
Quote:
do you think Russia is the aggressor here

Russian troops on non-russian soil. Yes, that much is bleedingly fucking obvious.
Quote:
do you realise that ethnic Russians are now being targeted by fascist thugs?

You do realise that those conflicts go both ways and Ukranian loyalists have been victims of violence as well?


I didnt realise Russia had invaded Ukraine. care to provide some evidence?


You indict yourself by your own stupidity. One need not say more.

Edited by humbert: 10/4/2014 11:44:23 PM


another ignorant without a clue ^
afromanGT
afromanGT
Legend
Legend (77K reputation)Legend (77K reputation)Legend (77K reputation)Legend (77K reputation)Legend (77K reputation)Legend (77K reputation)Legend (77K reputation)Legend (77K reputation)Legend (77K reputation)Legend (77K reputation)Legend (77K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 77K, Visits: 0
ricecrackers wrote:
afromanGT wrote:
ricecrackers wrote:
afromanGT wrote:
Quote:
do you remember the last time Germany engaged Russia in military conflict? how did that turn out?

You do realise that was in the middle of winter in a heavily fortified Moscow where Russia had superior troop numbers?
Quote:
do you think Russia is the aggressor here

Russian troops on non-russian soil. Yes, that much is bleedingly fucking obvious.
Quote:
do you realise that ethnic Russians are now being targeted by fascist thugs?

You do realise that those conflicts go both ways and Ukranian loyalists have been victims of violence as well?


I didnt realise Russia had invaded Ukraine. care to provide some evidence?

Russian troops were in Sevastopol before the 'referendum'.


they have a naval base there as well as long standing contract that they could station up to 25,000 troops in Crimea, of which they did not transgress

now about that evidence, got any?

25,000 troops in the naval base. Not occupying the government buildings or patrolling the Crimean border.

It's funny the way you're demanding 'evidence' when you point blank refuse to ever provide any evidence to back up your claims.

http://www.abc.net.au/news/2014-03-03/armed-soldier-outside-crimean-government-building/5294932
Article depicts Russian soldier outside Crimean government building on March 3rd 2014. Referendum was held March 16th 2014.
ricecrackers
ricecrackers
Pro
Pro (3.5K reputation)Pro (3.5K reputation)Pro (3.5K reputation)Pro (3.5K reputation)Pro (3.5K reputation)Pro (3.5K reputation)Pro (3.5K reputation)Pro (3.5K reputation)Pro (3.5K reputation)Pro (3.5K reputation)Pro (3.5K reputation)

Group: Banned Members
Posts: 3.5K, Visits: 0
afromanGT wrote:
ricecrackers wrote:
afromanGT wrote:
ricecrackers wrote:
afromanGT wrote:
Quote:
do you remember the last time Germany engaged Russia in military conflict? how did that turn out?

You do realise that was in the middle of winter in a heavily fortified Moscow where Russia had superior troop numbers?
Quote:
do you think Russia is the aggressor here

Russian troops on non-russian soil. Yes, that much is bleedingly fucking obvious.
Quote:
do you realise that ethnic Russians are now being targeted by fascist thugs?

You do realise that those conflicts go both ways and Ukranian loyalists have been victims of violence as well?


I didnt realise Russia had invaded Ukraine. care to provide some evidence?

Russian troops were in Sevastopol before the 'referendum'.


they have a naval base there as well as long standing contract that they could station up to 25,000 troops in Crimea, of which they did not transgress

now about that evidence, got any?

25,000 troops in the naval base. Not occupying the government buildings or patrolling the Crimean border.

It's funny the way you're demanding 'evidence' when you point blank refuse to ever provide any evidence to back up your claims.

http://www.abc.net.au/news/2014-03-03/armed-soldier-outside-crimean-government-building/5294932
Article depicts Russian soldier outside Crimean government building on March 3rd 2014. Referendum was held March 16th 2014.


firstly, that's a photograph. on its own it proves nothing. you dont know where it is and you dont know who that soldier is.

regardless, your claim is completely wrong. the provision allows for up to 25,000 troops in Crimea. Anywhere in Crimea. even the CIA agrees with this.

you have no idea, you're really quite stupid and again I expect you will lie again to try to save face.


afromanGT
afromanGT
Legend
Legend (77K reputation)Legend (77K reputation)Legend (77K reputation)Legend (77K reputation)Legend (77K reputation)Legend (77K reputation)Legend (77K reputation)Legend (77K reputation)Legend (77K reputation)Legend (77K reputation)Legend (77K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 77K, Visits: 0
Quote:
firstly, that's a photograph. on its own it proves nothing. you dont know where it is and you dont know who that soldier is.

My mistake. Allow me to take you in my time machine to transport us all back to March 3rd on the steps of the Sevastopol parliament.

Armed soliders storm Parliament on Feb 27th and you refuse to accept that these were Russian troops acting illegally.

And I'm the idiot. It's amazing how you're always right and everyone else is always wrong. How do you get your head so far up your own ass?
Quote:
even the CIA agrees with this.

US and EU deem Russian occupation illegal

Yup.
Russian-Ukraine Treaty wrote:
The Final Act obligates its signatories to "refrain…from the threat or use of force" against each other. According to the act, participating states "regard as inviolable one another's frontiers" and "will refrain now and in the future from assaulting those frontiers." They "will respect the territorial integrity of each of the participating states" and "will likewise refrain from making each other's territory the object of military occupation."
In addition, the participating states agree to "refrain from any intervention, direct or indirect, in the internal or external affairs" of another participating state.


Edited by afromanGT: 11/4/2014 12:19:57 AM
ricecrackers
ricecrackers
Pro
Pro (3.5K reputation)Pro (3.5K reputation)Pro (3.5K reputation)Pro (3.5K reputation)Pro (3.5K reputation)Pro (3.5K reputation)Pro (3.5K reputation)Pro (3.5K reputation)Pro (3.5K reputation)Pro (3.5K reputation)Pro (3.5K reputation)

Group: Banned Members
Posts: 3.5K, Visits: 0
afromanGT wrote:
Quote:
firstly, that's a photograph. on its own it proves nothing. you dont know where it is and you dont know who that soldier is.

My mistake. Allow me to take you in my time machine to transport us all back to March 3rd on the steps of the Sevastopol parliament.

Armed soliders storm Parliament on Feb 27th and you refuse to accept that these were Russian troops acting illegally.

And I'm the idiot. It's amazing how you're always right and everyone else is always wrong. How do you get your head so far up your own ass?
Quote:
even the CIA agrees with this.

US and EU deem Russian occupation illegal

Yup.
Russian-Ukraine Treaty wrote:
The Final Act obligates its signatories to "refrain…from the threat or use of force" against each other. According to the act, participating states "regard as inviolable one another's frontiers" and "will refrain now and in the future from assaulting those frontiers." They "will respect the territorial integrity of each of the participating states" and "will likewise refrain from making each other's territory the object of military occupation."
In addition, the participating states agree to "refrain from any intervention, direct or indirect, in the internal or external affairs" of another participating state.


Edited by afromanGT: 11/4/2014 12:19:57 AM


you're a glutton for masochism. why do you do this to yourself continually i'll never know...

there were no threats of force. the troops were moved in place to protect Russian bases.
it was completely legal and your article proves nothing, its simply propaganda

RT
http://rt.com/news/russian-troops-crimea-ukraine-816/

LA times
http://articles.latimes.com/2014/mar/03/world/la-fg-wn-us-intelligence-russia-ukraine-20140303

you mentioned Sevastopol, you do realise that the entire port of Sevastopol was already leased by Russia from the Ukraine?
http://www.haaretz.com/news/world/.premium-1.576212

you do realise that resultant from the violent revolution in Kiev that ousted a democratically elected government a law was hastily enacted that made Ukrainian the sole state language of Ukraine, despite the fact the majority of Crimea were Russian speaking? you knew that didnt you?
Heineken
Heineken
Legend
Legend (50K reputation)Legend (50K reputation)Legend (50K reputation)Legend (50K reputation)Legend (50K reputation)Legend (50K reputation)Legend (50K reputation)Legend (50K reputation)Legend (50K reputation)Legend (50K reputation)Legend (50K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 49K, Visits: 0
thupercoach wrote:
Putin has taken Russia back to its expansionist self of the mid-late 1800s.

Putin just wants to bring back to Soviet Union and resume the Cold War with America. The guy hates America with a passion that rivals the Taliban's hatred for America. That was basically why shit went down with Georgia, to stop them from joining the EU and becoming "Americanized". The whole 'South Ossetia' situation was merely a convenience excuse, and Russia's timing was impeccable. Given they launched the invasion on the Beijing Olympics opening ceremony, when the whole world's eyes was on China, and not Russia. Sure, there had been a little bit of tension in the weeks and months leading up to it, and there's history between the two over the region, but nobody was really concerned. It was also ultra convenient that the majority of Georgia's best troops were over in Iraq fighting alongside the Americans.

Massive similarities in regards to that with Ukraine. Recently, they've been making noises that they want to align themselves with the west, become a member of the EU, become bum chums with America. It's ultra-convenient that the Russian's have a naval base in Crimea, and that the majority of Crimean's are "ethnic Russian". Russia doesn't give a fuck about Crimea, in my opinion. They couldn't care if the majority of the civilians are "ethnic Russian", or hail from downtown Wellington.

It's Vladamir Putin swinging his dick around, letting America, the West and Europe know that he's still there, and that he's not going to cop American imposing themselves on the states that surround the glorious Russian Federation. His warning recently that armed intervention into the riots in Eastern Ukraine would lead to civil war, would make his Christmases come early. He'll do exactly what he did in 2008, and in Crimea, and just move the troops in, under the guise of "protecting Russians, and Russian interests". The "world" is just more aware of it now than they were in 2008.

WOLLONGONG WOLVES FOR A-LEAGUE EXPANSION!

ricecrackers
ricecrackers
Pro
Pro (3.5K reputation)Pro (3.5K reputation)Pro (3.5K reputation)Pro (3.5K reputation)Pro (3.5K reputation)Pro (3.5K reputation)Pro (3.5K reputation)Pro (3.5K reputation)Pro (3.5K reputation)Pro (3.5K reputation)Pro (3.5K reputation)

Group: Banned Members
Posts: 3.5K, Visits: 0
Heineken wrote:
thupercoach wrote:
Putin has taken Russia back to its expansionist self of the mid-late 1800s.

Putin just wants to bring back to Soviet Union and resume the Cold War with America.


evidence?
GO


Select a Forum....























Inside Sport


Search