Putin ready to invade Ukraine; Kiev warns of war


Putin ready to invade Ukraine; Kiev warns of war

Author
Message
ricecrackers
ricecrackers
Pro
Pro (3.5K reputation)Pro (3.5K reputation)Pro (3.5K reputation)Pro (3.5K reputation)Pro (3.5K reputation)Pro (3.5K reputation)Pro (3.5K reputation)Pro (3.5K reputation)Pro (3.5K reputation)Pro (3.5K reputation)Pro (3.5K reputation)

Group: Banned Members
Posts: 3.5K, Visits: 0
Heineken wrote:
thupercoach wrote:
Putin has taken Russia back to its expansionist self of the mid-late 1800s.

Putin just wants to bring back to Soviet Union and resume the Cold War with America.


evidence?
Heineken
Heineken
Legend
Legend (50K reputation)Legend (50K reputation)Legend (50K reputation)Legend (50K reputation)Legend (50K reputation)Legend (50K reputation)Legend (50K reputation)Legend (50K reputation)Legend (50K reputation)Legend (50K reputation)Legend (50K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 49K, Visits: 0
thupercoach wrote:
Putin has taken Russia back to its expansionist self of the mid-late 1800s.

Putin just wants to bring back to Soviet Union and resume the Cold War with America. The guy hates America with a passion that rivals the Taliban's hatred for America. That was basically why shit went down with Georgia, to stop them from joining the EU and becoming "Americanized". The whole 'South Ossetia' situation was merely a convenience excuse, and Russia's timing was impeccable. Given they launched the invasion on the Beijing Olympics opening ceremony, when the whole world's eyes was on China, and not Russia. Sure, there had been a little bit of tension in the weeks and months leading up to it, and there's history between the two over the region, but nobody was really concerned. It was also ultra convenient that the majority of Georgia's best troops were over in Iraq fighting alongside the Americans.

Massive similarities in regards to that with Ukraine. Recently, they've been making noises that they want to align themselves with the west, become a member of the EU, become bum chums with America. It's ultra-convenient that the Russian's have a naval base in Crimea, and that the majority of Crimean's are "ethnic Russian". Russia doesn't give a fuck about Crimea, in my opinion. They couldn't care if the majority of the civilians are "ethnic Russian", or hail from downtown Wellington.

It's Vladamir Putin swinging his dick around, letting America, the West and Europe know that he's still there, and that he's not going to cop American imposing themselves on the states that surround the glorious Russian Federation. His warning recently that armed intervention into the riots in Eastern Ukraine would lead to civil war, would make his Christmases come early. He'll do exactly what he did in 2008, and in Crimea, and just move the troops in, under the guise of "protecting Russians, and Russian interests". The "world" is just more aware of it now than they were in 2008.

WOLLONGONG WOLVES FOR A-LEAGUE EXPANSION!

ricecrackers
ricecrackers
Pro
Pro (3.5K reputation)Pro (3.5K reputation)Pro (3.5K reputation)Pro (3.5K reputation)Pro (3.5K reputation)Pro (3.5K reputation)Pro (3.5K reputation)Pro (3.5K reputation)Pro (3.5K reputation)Pro (3.5K reputation)Pro (3.5K reputation)

Group: Banned Members
Posts: 3.5K, Visits: 0
afromanGT wrote:
Quote:
firstly, that's a photograph. on its own it proves nothing. you dont know where it is and you dont know who that soldier is.

My mistake. Allow me to take you in my time machine to transport us all back to March 3rd on the steps of the Sevastopol parliament.

Armed soliders storm Parliament on Feb 27th and you refuse to accept that these were Russian troops acting illegally.

And I'm the idiot. It's amazing how you're always right and everyone else is always wrong. How do you get your head so far up your own ass?
Quote:
even the CIA agrees with this.

US and EU deem Russian occupation illegal

Yup.
Russian-Ukraine Treaty wrote:
The Final Act obligates its signatories to "refrain…from the threat or use of force" against each other. According to the act, participating states "regard as inviolable one another's frontiers" and "will refrain now and in the future from assaulting those frontiers." They "will respect the territorial integrity of each of the participating states" and "will likewise refrain from making each other's territory the object of military occupation."
In addition, the participating states agree to "refrain from any intervention, direct or indirect, in the internal or external affairs" of another participating state.


Edited by afromanGT: 11/4/2014 12:19:57 AM


you're a glutton for masochism. why do you do this to yourself continually i'll never know...

there were no threats of force. the troops were moved in place to protect Russian bases.
it was completely legal and your article proves nothing, its simply propaganda

RT
http://rt.com/news/russian-troops-crimea-ukraine-816/

LA times
http://articles.latimes.com/2014/mar/03/world/la-fg-wn-us-intelligence-russia-ukraine-20140303

you mentioned Sevastopol, you do realise that the entire port of Sevastopol was already leased by Russia from the Ukraine?
http://www.haaretz.com/news/world/.premium-1.576212

you do realise that resultant from the violent revolution in Kiev that ousted a democratically elected government a law was hastily enacted that made Ukrainian the sole state language of Ukraine, despite the fact the majority of Crimea were Russian speaking? you knew that didnt you?
afromanGT
afromanGT
Legend
Legend (77K reputation)Legend (77K reputation)Legend (77K reputation)Legend (77K reputation)Legend (77K reputation)Legend (77K reputation)Legend (77K reputation)Legend (77K reputation)Legend (77K reputation)Legend (77K reputation)Legend (77K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 77K, Visits: 0
Quote:
firstly, that's a photograph. on its own it proves nothing. you dont know where it is and you dont know who that soldier is.

My mistake. Allow me to take you in my time machine to transport us all back to March 3rd on the steps of the Sevastopol parliament.

Armed soliders storm Parliament on Feb 27th and you refuse to accept that these were Russian troops acting illegally.

And I'm the idiot. It's amazing how you're always right and everyone else is always wrong. How do you get your head so far up your own ass?
Quote:
even the CIA agrees with this.

US and EU deem Russian occupation illegal

Yup.
Russian-Ukraine Treaty wrote:
The Final Act obligates its signatories to "refrain…from the threat or use of force" against each other. According to the act, participating states "regard as inviolable one another's frontiers" and "will refrain now and in the future from assaulting those frontiers." They "will respect the territorial integrity of each of the participating states" and "will likewise refrain from making each other's territory the object of military occupation."
In addition, the participating states agree to "refrain from any intervention, direct or indirect, in the internal or external affairs" of another participating state.


Edited by afromanGT: 11/4/2014 12:19:57 AM
ricecrackers
ricecrackers
Pro
Pro (3.5K reputation)Pro (3.5K reputation)Pro (3.5K reputation)Pro (3.5K reputation)Pro (3.5K reputation)Pro (3.5K reputation)Pro (3.5K reputation)Pro (3.5K reputation)Pro (3.5K reputation)Pro (3.5K reputation)Pro (3.5K reputation)

Group: Banned Members
Posts: 3.5K, Visits: 0
afromanGT wrote:
ricecrackers wrote:
afromanGT wrote:
ricecrackers wrote:
afromanGT wrote:
Quote:
do you remember the last time Germany engaged Russia in military conflict? how did that turn out?

You do realise that was in the middle of winter in a heavily fortified Moscow where Russia had superior troop numbers?
Quote:
do you think Russia is the aggressor here

Russian troops on non-russian soil. Yes, that much is bleedingly fucking obvious.
Quote:
do you realise that ethnic Russians are now being targeted by fascist thugs?

You do realise that those conflicts go both ways and Ukranian loyalists have been victims of violence as well?


I didnt realise Russia had invaded Ukraine. care to provide some evidence?

Russian troops were in Sevastopol before the 'referendum'.


they have a naval base there as well as long standing contract that they could station up to 25,000 troops in Crimea, of which they did not transgress

now about that evidence, got any?

25,000 troops in the naval base. Not occupying the government buildings or patrolling the Crimean border.

It's funny the way you're demanding 'evidence' when you point blank refuse to ever provide any evidence to back up your claims.

http://www.abc.net.au/news/2014-03-03/armed-soldier-outside-crimean-government-building/5294932
Article depicts Russian soldier outside Crimean government building on March 3rd 2014. Referendum was held March 16th 2014.


firstly, that's a photograph. on its own it proves nothing. you dont know where it is and you dont know who that soldier is.

regardless, your claim is completely wrong. the provision allows for up to 25,000 troops in Crimea. Anywhere in Crimea. even the CIA agrees with this.

you have no idea, you're really quite stupid and again I expect you will lie again to try to save face.


afromanGT
afromanGT
Legend
Legend (77K reputation)Legend (77K reputation)Legend (77K reputation)Legend (77K reputation)Legend (77K reputation)Legend (77K reputation)Legend (77K reputation)Legend (77K reputation)Legend (77K reputation)Legend (77K reputation)Legend (77K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 77K, Visits: 0
ricecrackers wrote:
afromanGT wrote:
ricecrackers wrote:
afromanGT wrote:
Quote:
do you remember the last time Germany engaged Russia in military conflict? how did that turn out?

You do realise that was in the middle of winter in a heavily fortified Moscow where Russia had superior troop numbers?
Quote:
do you think Russia is the aggressor here

Russian troops on non-russian soil. Yes, that much is bleedingly fucking obvious.
Quote:
do you realise that ethnic Russians are now being targeted by fascist thugs?

You do realise that those conflicts go both ways and Ukranian loyalists have been victims of violence as well?


I didnt realise Russia had invaded Ukraine. care to provide some evidence?

Russian troops were in Sevastopol before the 'referendum'.


they have a naval base there as well as long standing contract that they could station up to 25,000 troops in Crimea, of which they did not transgress

now about that evidence, got any?

25,000 troops in the naval base. Not occupying the government buildings or patrolling the Crimean border.

It's funny the way you're demanding 'evidence' when you point blank refuse to ever provide any evidence to back up your claims.

http://www.abc.net.au/news/2014-03-03/armed-soldier-outside-crimean-government-building/5294932
Article depicts Russian soldier outside Crimean government building on March 3rd 2014. Referendum was held March 16th 2014.
ricecrackers
ricecrackers
Pro
Pro (3.5K reputation)Pro (3.5K reputation)Pro (3.5K reputation)Pro (3.5K reputation)Pro (3.5K reputation)Pro (3.5K reputation)Pro (3.5K reputation)Pro (3.5K reputation)Pro (3.5K reputation)Pro (3.5K reputation)Pro (3.5K reputation)

Group: Banned Members
Posts: 3.5K, Visits: 0
humbert wrote:
ricecrackers wrote:
afromanGT wrote:
Quote:
do you remember the last time Germany engaged Russia in military conflict? how did that turn out?

You do realise that was in the middle of winter in a heavily fortified Moscow where Russia had superior troop numbers?
Quote:
do you think Russia is the aggressor here

Russian troops on non-russian soil. Yes, that much is bleedingly fucking obvious.
Quote:
do you realise that ethnic Russians are now being targeted by fascist thugs?

You do realise that those conflicts go both ways and Ukranian loyalists have been victims of violence as well?


I didnt realise Russia had invaded Ukraine. care to provide some evidence?


You indict yourself by your own stupidity. One need not say more.

Edited by humbert: 10/4/2014 11:44:23 PM


another ignorant without a clue ^
ricecrackers
ricecrackers
Pro
Pro (3.5K reputation)Pro (3.5K reputation)Pro (3.5K reputation)Pro (3.5K reputation)Pro (3.5K reputation)Pro (3.5K reputation)Pro (3.5K reputation)Pro (3.5K reputation)Pro (3.5K reputation)Pro (3.5K reputation)Pro (3.5K reputation)

Group: Banned Members
Posts: 3.5K, Visits: 0
afromanGT wrote:
ricecrackers wrote:
afromanGT wrote:
Quote:
do you remember the last time Germany engaged Russia in military conflict? how did that turn out?

You do realise that was in the middle of winter in a heavily fortified Moscow where Russia had superior troop numbers?
Quote:
do you think Russia is the aggressor here

Russian troops on non-russian soil. Yes, that much is bleedingly fucking obvious.
Quote:
do you realise that ethnic Russians are now being targeted by fascist thugs?

You do realise that those conflicts go both ways and Ukranian loyalists have been victims of violence as well?


I didnt realise Russia had invaded Ukraine. care to provide some evidence?

Russian troops were in Sevastopol before the 'referendum'.


they have a naval base there as well as long standing contract that they could station up to 25,000 troops in Crimea, of which they did not transgress

now about that evidence, got any?
humbert
humbert
Semi-Pro
Semi-Pro (1.7K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.7K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.7K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.7K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.7K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.7K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.7K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.7K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.7K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.7K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.7K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 1.6K, Visits: 0
ricecrackers wrote:
afromanGT wrote:
Quote:
do you remember the last time Germany engaged Russia in military conflict? how did that turn out?

You do realise that was in the middle of winter in a heavily fortified Moscow where Russia had superior troop numbers?
Quote:
do you think Russia is the aggressor here

Russian troops on non-russian soil. Yes, that much is bleedingly fucking obvious.
Quote:
do you realise that ethnic Russians are now being targeted by fascist thugs?

You do realise that those conflicts go both ways and Ukranian loyalists have been victims of violence as well?


I didnt realise Russia had invaded Ukraine. care to provide some evidence?


You indict yourself by your own stupidity. One need not say more.

Edited by humbert: 10/4/2014 11:44:23 PM
afromanGT
afromanGT
Legend
Legend (77K reputation)Legend (77K reputation)Legend (77K reputation)Legend (77K reputation)Legend (77K reputation)Legend (77K reputation)Legend (77K reputation)Legend (77K reputation)Legend (77K reputation)Legend (77K reputation)Legend (77K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 77K, Visits: 0
ricecrackers wrote:
afromanGT wrote:
Quote:
do you remember the last time Germany engaged Russia in military conflict? how did that turn out?

You do realise that was in the middle of winter in a heavily fortified Moscow where Russia had superior troop numbers?
Quote:
do you think Russia is the aggressor here

Russian troops on non-russian soil. Yes, that much is bleedingly fucking obvious.
Quote:
do you realise that ethnic Russians are now being targeted by fascist thugs?

You do realise that those conflicts go both ways and Ukranian loyalists have been victims of violence as well?


I didnt realise Russia had invaded Ukraine. care to provide some evidence?

Russian troops were in Sevastopol before the 'referendum'.
ricecrackers
ricecrackers
Pro
Pro (3.5K reputation)Pro (3.5K reputation)Pro (3.5K reputation)Pro (3.5K reputation)Pro (3.5K reputation)Pro (3.5K reputation)Pro (3.5K reputation)Pro (3.5K reputation)Pro (3.5K reputation)Pro (3.5K reputation)Pro (3.5K reputation)

Group: Banned Members
Posts: 3.5K, Visits: 0
afromanGT wrote:
Quote:
do you remember the last time Germany engaged Russia in military conflict? how did that turn out?

You do realise that was in the middle of winter in a heavily fortified Moscow where Russia had superior troop numbers?
Quote:
do you think Russia is the aggressor here

Russian troops on non-russian soil. Yes, that much is bleedingly fucking obvious.
Quote:
do you realise that ethnic Russians are now being targeted by fascist thugs?

You do realise that those conflicts go both ways and Ukranian loyalists have been victims of violence as well?


I didnt realise Russia had invaded Ukraine. care to provide some evidence?
afromanGT
afromanGT
Legend
Legend (77K reputation)Legend (77K reputation)Legend (77K reputation)Legend (77K reputation)Legend (77K reputation)Legend (77K reputation)Legend (77K reputation)Legend (77K reputation)Legend (77K reputation)Legend (77K reputation)Legend (77K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 77K, Visits: 0
Quote:
do you remember the last time Germany engaged Russia in military conflict? how did that turn out?

You do realise that was in the middle of winter in a heavily fortified Moscow where Russia had superior troop numbers?
Quote:
do you think Russia is the aggressor here

Russian troops on non-russian soil. Yes, that much is bleedingly fucking obvious.
Quote:
do you realise that ethnic Russians are now being targeted by fascist thugs?

You do realise that those conflicts go both ways and Ukranian loyalists have been victims of violence as well?
ricecrackers
ricecrackers
Pro
Pro (3.5K reputation)Pro (3.5K reputation)Pro (3.5K reputation)Pro (3.5K reputation)Pro (3.5K reputation)Pro (3.5K reputation)Pro (3.5K reputation)Pro (3.5K reputation)Pro (3.5K reputation)Pro (3.5K reputation)Pro (3.5K reputation)

Group: Banned Members
Posts: 3.5K, Visits: 0
afromanGT wrote:
ricecrackers wrote:
afromanGT wrote:
ricecrackers wrote:
no idea :roll:

Quality contribution.


"Germany need to mobilise their armies"

what have you been smoking :oops:

With the majority of Europe currently relying on Germany for economic stability, they basically determine the stance and course of action for the entire continent. On top of that they have one of Europe's elite armed forces, if they mobilize in the Ukraine to keep the peace, Russia won't risk full scale military conflict against what will in reality become the majority of Europe.

Aside from principle and a sense of loyalty to expats, Russia has very little to gain from full scale conflict in Ukraine - they're an import economy which owes Gazprom $2.2bn. About all Russia has to benefit from annexing Ukraine is their metal industry.


you really dont have a clue what you're talking about.

do you remember the last time Germany engaged Russia in military conflict? how did that turn out?

do you realise who it was that encouraged the regime change in Ukraine? ie who caused it

do you understand the hypocrisy of Kerry's position regarding peaceful protesters in Eastern Ukraine when he supported violent protesters in Kiev and Lviv?

do you think Russia is the aggressor here when they were previously satisfied with the arrangement with Ukraine which has since entered an agreement with NATO under US pressure?

do you realise that ethnic Russians are now being targeted by fascist thugs?
thupercoach
thupercoach
World Class
World Class (8.4K reputation)World Class (8.4K reputation)World Class (8.4K reputation)World Class (8.4K reputation)World Class (8.4K reputation)World Class (8.4K reputation)World Class (8.4K reputation)World Class (8.4K reputation)World Class (8.4K reputation)World Class (8.4K reputation)World Class (8.4K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 8.3K, Visits: 0
Heineken wrote:
A lot of similarities to this by Russia with what they did with Georgia & South Ossetia. Vladamir Putin trying to flex his muscles.
Oh yeah.
Heineken
Heineken
Legend
Legend (50K reputation)Legend (50K reputation)Legend (50K reputation)Legend (50K reputation)Legend (50K reputation)Legend (50K reputation)Legend (50K reputation)Legend (50K reputation)Legend (50K reputation)Legend (50K reputation)Legend (50K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 49K, Visits: 0
A lot of similarities to this by Russia with what they did with Georgia & South Ossetia. Vladamir Putin trying to flex his muscles.

WOLLONGONG WOLVES FOR A-LEAGUE EXPANSION!

afromanGT
afromanGT
Legend
Legend (77K reputation)Legend (77K reputation)Legend (77K reputation)Legend (77K reputation)Legend (77K reputation)Legend (77K reputation)Legend (77K reputation)Legend (77K reputation)Legend (77K reputation)Legend (77K reputation)Legend (77K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 77K, Visits: 0
Scoll wrote:
afromanGT wrote:
Aside from principle and a sense of loyalty to expats, Russia has very little to gain from full scale conflict in Ukraine - they're an import economy which owes Gazprom $2.2bn. About all Russia has to benefit from annexing Ukraine is their metal industry.

Crimea was important for its port and gas line. Beyond that I don't imagine Russia much care either way what happens to the rest of Ukraine.

Russia already has a port at Rostov. However, 66% of Russia's natural gas exported to the EU passes through Crimea, and if they were to capture Donetsk it would increase Russia's Iron and Steel production by nearly 50%.
thupercoach
thupercoach
World Class
World Class (8.4K reputation)World Class (8.4K reputation)World Class (8.4K reputation)World Class (8.4K reputation)World Class (8.4K reputation)World Class (8.4K reputation)World Class (8.4K reputation)World Class (8.4K reputation)World Class (8.4K reputation)World Class (8.4K reputation)World Class (8.4K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 8.3K, Visits: 0
Putin has taken Russia back to its expansionist self of the mid-late 1800s.
Scoll
Scoll
Semi-Pro
Semi-Pro (1.6K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.6K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.6K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.6K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.6K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.6K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.6K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.6K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.6K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.6K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.6K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 1.6K, Visits: 0
afromanGT wrote:
Aside from principle and a sense of loyalty to expats, Russia has very little to gain from full scale conflict in Ukraine - they're an import economy which owes Gazprom $2.2bn. About all Russia has to benefit from annexing Ukraine is their metal industry.

Crimea was important for its port and gas line. Beyond that I don't imagine Russia much care either way what happens to the rest of Ukraine.
afromanGT
afromanGT
Legend
Legend (77K reputation)Legend (77K reputation)Legend (77K reputation)Legend (77K reputation)Legend (77K reputation)Legend (77K reputation)Legend (77K reputation)Legend (77K reputation)Legend (77K reputation)Legend (77K reputation)Legend (77K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 77K, Visits: 0
ricecrackers wrote:
afromanGT wrote:
ricecrackers wrote:
no idea :roll:

Quality contribution.


"Germany need to mobilise their armies"

what have you been smoking :oops:

With the majority of Europe currently relying on Germany for economic stability, they basically determine the stance and course of action for the entire continent. On top of that they have one of Europe's elite armed forces, if they mobilize in the Ukraine to keep the peace, Russia won't risk full scale military conflict against what will in reality become the majority of Europe.

Aside from principle and a sense of loyalty to expats, Russia has very little to gain from full scale conflict in Ukraine - they're an import economy which owes Gazprom $2.2bn. About all Russia has to benefit from annexing Ukraine is their metal industry.
ricecrackers
ricecrackers
Pro
Pro (3.5K reputation)Pro (3.5K reputation)Pro (3.5K reputation)Pro (3.5K reputation)Pro (3.5K reputation)Pro (3.5K reputation)Pro (3.5K reputation)Pro (3.5K reputation)Pro (3.5K reputation)Pro (3.5K reputation)Pro (3.5K reputation)

Group: Banned Members
Posts: 3.5K, Visits: 0
afromanGT wrote:
ricecrackers wrote:
no idea :roll:

Quality contribution.


"Germany need to mobilise their armies"

what have you been smoking :oops:
afromanGT
afromanGT
Legend
Legend (77K reputation)Legend (77K reputation)Legend (77K reputation)Legend (77K reputation)Legend (77K reputation)Legend (77K reputation)Legend (77K reputation)Legend (77K reputation)Legend (77K reputation)Legend (77K reputation)Legend (77K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 77K, Visits: 0
ricecrackers wrote:
no idea :roll:

Quality contribution.
ricecrackers
ricecrackers
Pro
Pro (3.5K reputation)Pro (3.5K reputation)Pro (3.5K reputation)Pro (3.5K reputation)Pro (3.5K reputation)Pro (3.5K reputation)Pro (3.5K reputation)Pro (3.5K reputation)Pro (3.5K reputation)Pro (3.5K reputation)Pro (3.5K reputation)

Group: Banned Members
Posts: 3.5K, Visits: 0
no idea :roll:
afromanGT
afromanGT
Legend
Legend (77K reputation)Legend (77K reputation)Legend (77K reputation)Legend (77K reputation)Legend (77K reputation)Legend (77K reputation)Legend (77K reputation)Legend (77K reputation)Legend (77K reputation)Legend (77K reputation)Legend (77K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 77K, Visits: 0
Germany need to mobilize their armies and force Russia to back down.
Quote:
Bush had only been Pres for six months when 9/11 happened.

The US President is sworn in on January 20th. That's more than six months.
thupercoach
thupercoach
World Class
World Class (8.4K reputation)World Class (8.4K reputation)World Class (8.4K reputation)World Class (8.4K reputation)World Class (8.4K reputation)World Class (8.4K reputation)World Class (8.4K reputation)World Class (8.4K reputation)World Class (8.4K reputation)World Class (8.4K reputation)World Class (8.4K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 8.3K, Visits: 0
paladisious wrote:
thupercoach wrote:
Geez the Obama malaise is worse than the Carter malaise...

Putin is just doing what he can get away with.

I distinctly remember two large towers in New York that were there during Clinton's administration. Did something happen to them under Bush? Which administration got the guy responsible? :-k
The guy who dramatically reduced USA's intelligence capabilities. He was in charge for 8 years right before Bush. Bush had only been Pres for six months when 9/11 happened.
Glory Recruit
Glory Recruit
Legend
Legend (14K reputation)Legend (14K reputation)Legend (14K reputation)Legend (14K reputation)Legend (14K reputation)Legend (14K reputation)Legend (14K reputation)Legend (14K reputation)Legend (14K reputation)Legend (14K reputation)Legend (14K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 13K, Visits: 0
Quote:
Russia warns of civil war if Ukraine uses force to quell eastern revolts

(CNN) -- Russia's Foreign Ministry warned Kiev on Tuesday that any use of force in Ukraine's eastern region could lead to civil war, as Ukraine's government seeks to regain control after pro-Moscow uprisings in three cities.

Pro-Moscow protesters seized government buildings, raised Russian flags and declared new governments in Donetsk, Luhansk and Kharkiv on Sunday.

Russia's Foreign Ministry said that reports that pro-Russian protesters, including those occupying a regional administration building in the city of Donetsk, are facing a crackdown by Ukrainian authorities are of particular concern.

"We are calling for the immediate cessation of any military preparations, which could lead to civil war," it said in a statement on its official website.

The ministry alleged that what it called "American experts from the private military organization Greystone," disguised as soldiers, as well as militants from the Ukrainian far-right group Right Sector, had joined Ukrainian forces preparing for the crackdown in the country's east.

Late Monday, Ukrainian special forces cleared armed protesters from the headquarters of Ukrainian security services in Donetsk, acting President Oleksandr Turchynov's office announced Monday night.

But Ukraine's interim Deputy Prime Minister Vitaly Yarema was quoted by Russian state-run news agency ITAR-Tass as saying Tuesday that the authorities are not going to storm the city's regional administration building.

Yarema said the decision was made after talks with representatives of the protesters in the building.

A CNN team on the ground said pro-Russian protesters appear still to be in control of the building and that there is no sign of special forces nearby.

Donetsk is the hometown of ousted Ukrainian President Viktor Yanukovych, whose pro-Russian government was toppled in a popular revolt in February.

'Anti-terrorist operation'

Meanwhile, acting Ukrainian Interior Minister Arsen Avakov said an anti-terrorist operation is under way in Kharkiv, where the center of the city is blocked off as well as the metro stations.

In a post on his official Facebook page, he urged people to remain calm and said everything would reopen once the operation is over.

Avakov said no guns have been fired in the operation and that some 70 people have been arrested so far.

On Monday, Turchynov blamed "separatist groups coordinated by Russian special services" for the revolts, which he said echoed events leading to the Russian annexation of Crimea three weeks ago.

"Enemies of Ukraine are trying to play out the Crimean scenario, but we will not let this happen," Turchynov said in a televised message.

Russia urges talks

Russia, which has tens of thousands of troops near the Ukrainian border, said it was "watching closely" and told Ukraine to stop blaming it for Ukrainian problems.

President Vladimir Putin's government pushed Ukraine to set up a federal system in which regions with ethnic Russian majorities would have more autonomy, and its foreign ministry urged Ukraine to enter into talks over the issue.

"Ukrainian people want to get a clear answer from Kiev to all their questions. It's time to listen to these legal claims," a Foreign Ministry statement read. The Ukrainian government was acting "irresponsibly," it said.

But in Washington, U.S. officials urged Putin's government to disavow the protests and warned that further Russian intervention in Ukraine would bring stiffer economic sanctions than those already imposed on targeted individuals over the Crimean annexation.

Moscow dispatched thousands of troops to Crimea in support of a pro-Russian movement that seized power in the semi-autonomous region shortly after Yanukovych fled to Russia. The Black Sea peninsula was then subsumed into Russia following a referendum denounced as illegal by Kiev and the West

Russia has called Yanukovych's removal a coup and says the interim government in Kiev is illegitimate. It has said it doesn't intend to invade eastern Ukraine but reserves the right to protect ethnic Russians there.


http://edition.cnn.com/2014/04/08/world/europe/ukraine-crisis/index.html?hpt=hp_t2
paladisious
paladisious
Legend
Legend (40K reputation)Legend (40K reputation)Legend (40K reputation)Legend (40K reputation)Legend (40K reputation)Legend (40K reputation)Legend (40K reputation)Legend (40K reputation)Legend (40K reputation)Legend (40K reputation)Legend (40K reputation)

Group: Moderators
Posts: 39K, Visits: 0
thupercoach wrote:
Geez the Obama malaise is worse than the Carter malaise...

Putin is just doing what he can get away with.

I distinctly remember two large towers in New York that were there during Clinton's administration. Did something happen to them under Bush? Which administration got the guy responsible? :-k
thupercoach
thupercoach
World Class
World Class (8.4K reputation)World Class (8.4K reputation)World Class (8.4K reputation)World Class (8.4K reputation)World Class (8.4K reputation)World Class (8.4K reputation)World Class (8.4K reputation)World Class (8.4K reputation)World Class (8.4K reputation)World Class (8.4K reputation)World Class (8.4K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 8.3K, Visits: 0
Geez the Obama malaise is worse than the Carter malaise...

Putin is just doing what he can get away with.
paulbagzFC
paulbagzFC
Legend
Legend (45K reputation)Legend (45K reputation)Legend (45K reputation)Legend (45K reputation)Legend (45K reputation)Legend (45K reputation)Legend (45K reputation)Legend (45K reputation)Legend (45K reputation)Legend (45K reputation)Legend (45K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 44K, Visits: 0
I look forward to the day that Putin has to defend ethnic Russians in a country like Italy :lol:

-PB

https://i.imgur.com/batge7K.jpg

Glory Recruit
Glory Recruit
Legend
Legend (14K reputation)Legend (14K reputation)Legend (14K reputation)Legend (14K reputation)Legend (14K reputation)Legend (14K reputation)Legend (14K reputation)Legend (14K reputation)Legend (14K reputation)Legend (14K reputation)Legend (14K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 13K, Visits: 0
Not looking good in eastern ukraine.
humbert
humbert
Semi-Pro
Semi-Pro (1.7K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.7K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.7K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.7K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.7K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.7K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.7K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.7K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.7K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.7K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.7K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 1.6K, Visits: 0
http://www.interpretermag.com/rts-manuel-ochsenreiter/

RT: Decries fascist influence in Ukraine. Invites actual fascist into studio, and designates him a 'Mid-East expert'

Edited by humbert: 23/3/2014 03:00:18 PM
GO


Select a Forum....























Inside Sport


Search