paladisious
|
|
Group: Moderators
Posts: 39K,
Visits: 0
|
huffpost wrote:Fred Phelps, Westboro Baptist Church Founder, Is 'On The Edge Of Death' The Huffington Post | by Ryan Grenoble
Fred Phelps, the founder of the highly controversial Westboro Baptist Church, which is known for protesting high-profile funerals with signs that read "God Hates Fags," is said to be dying at a hospice center in Kansas.
The news comes via Nate Phelps, one of Fred's estranged children, who wrote this in a Facebook post Saturday night.
I've learned that my father, Fred Phelps, Sr., pastor of the "God Hates Fags" Westboro Baptist Church, was ex-communicated from the "church" back in August of 2013. He is now on the edge of death at Midland Hospice house in Topeka, Kansas. I'm not sure how I feel about this. Terribly ironic that his devotion to his god ends this way. Destroyed by the monster he made.
I feel sad for all the hurt he's caused so many. I feel sad for those who will lose the grandfather and father they loved. And I'm bitterly angry that my family is blocking the family members who left from seeing him, and saying their good-byes.
In an interview with Patheos, Nate confirmed the statement was true, saying he'd spoken with several other family members who, like him, had previously been "excommunicated" from the church.
Westboro Baptist Church did not immediately respond to a request for comment from The Huffington Post. Edited by paladisious: 22/3/2014 09:57:56 PM
|
|
|
|
toffeeAU
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 1.4K,
Visits: 0
|
inb4 thread degeneration.
|
|
|
afromanGT
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 77K,
Visits: 0
|
If everyone within 2000km doesn't picket his funeral I'll be sorely disappointed.
|
|
|
Shaker
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 3.9K,
Visits: 0
|
|
|
|
ricecrackers
|
|
Group: Banned Members
Posts: 3.5K,
Visits: 0
|
somehow i dont think he'll notice them
|
|
|
ricecrackers
|
|
Group: Banned Members
Posts: 3.5K,
Visits: 0
|
celebrating the death of an innocent man how tasteless
|
|
|
Glory Recruit
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 13K,
Visits: 0
|
Burn them all.
|
|
|
paladisious
|
|
Group: Moderators
Posts: 39K,
Visits: 0
|
Best thing is that the WBC excommunicated him, so for all we know they'll be picketing his funeral along with the rest of the world.
That's what you get when you live your life by a creed of hate.
Edited by paladisious: 17/3/2014 08:18:03 PM
|
|
|
ricecrackers
|
|
Group: Banned Members
Posts: 3.5K,
Visits: 0
|
paladisious wrote:Best thing is that the WBC excommunicated him, so for all we know they'll be picketing his funeral along with the rest of the world.
That's what you get when you live your life by a creed of hate.
Edited by paladisious: 17/3/2014 08:18:03 PM a few others in this thread seem to live by a similar creed i expect we'll see a few more arrive soon
|
|
|
Fredsta
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 14K,
Visits: 0
|
I would genuinely love to see how they cope with a taste of their own medicine when his funeral is picketed.
|
|
|
afromanGT
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 77K,
Visits: 0
|
ricecrackers wrote:celebrating the death of an innocent man how tasteless He founded and actively campaigned for one of the most hated organisations of the 21st century. He's hardly 'innocent'. Don't let the fact that the monster he created excommunicated him soften public opinion of him, he was a horrible man.
|
|
|
ricecrackers
|
|
Group: Banned Members
Posts: 3.5K,
Visits: 0
|
afromanGT wrote:ricecrackers wrote:celebrating the death of an innocent man how tasteless He founded and actively campaigned for one of the most hated organisations of the 21st century. He's hardly 'innocent'. Don't let the fact that the monster he created excommunicated him soften public opinion of him, he was a horrible man. meh. just a strawman group for the huffington post to wind its readers up about. hardly as important as you make them out to be. he wasnt convicted of anything, therefore innocent there are far worse people and groups in this world you should be turning your attention to.
|
|
|
afromanGT
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 77K,
Visits: 0
|
ricecrackers wrote:afromanGT wrote:ricecrackers wrote:celebrating the death of an innocent man how tasteless He founded and actively campaigned for one of the most hated organisations of the 21st century. He's hardly 'innocent'. Don't let the fact that the monster he created excommunicated him soften public opinion of him, he was a horrible man. meh. just a strawman group for the huffington post to wind its readers up about. hardly as important as you make them out to be. he wasnt convicted of anything, therefore innocentthere are far worse people and groups in this world you should be turning your attention to. Hitler wasn't convicted of anything. Therefor innocent.
|
|
|
ricecrackers
|
|
Group: Banned Members
Posts: 3.5K,
Visits: 0
|
afromanGT wrote:ricecrackers wrote:afromanGT wrote:ricecrackers wrote:celebrating the death of an innocent man how tasteless He founded and actively campaigned for one of the most hated organisations of the 21st century. He's hardly 'innocent'. Don't let the fact that the monster he created excommunicated him soften public opinion of him, he was a horrible man. meh. just a strawman group for the huffington post to wind its readers up about. hardly as important as you make them out to be. he wasnt convicted of anything, therefore innocentthere are far worse people and groups in this world you should be turning your attention to. Hitler wasn't convicted of anything. Therefor innocent. Godwin's law arrived a little early today
|
|
|
jlm8695
|
|
Group: Banned Members
Posts: 19K,
Visits: 0
|
:lol: :lol:
|
|
|
paladisious
|
|
Group: Moderators
Posts: 39K,
Visits: 0
|
ricecrackers wrote:afromanGT wrote:ricecrackers wrote:celebrating the death of an innocent man how tasteless He founded and actively campaigned for one of the most hated organisations of the 21st century. He's hardly 'innocent'. Don't let the fact that the monster he created excommunicated him soften public opinion of him, he was a horrible man. meh. just a strawman group for the huffington post to wind its readers up about. hardly as important as you make them out to be. he wasnt convicted of anything, therefore innocent there are far worse people and groups in this world you should be turning your attention to. Absolutely he didn't break any laws (except arguably harassment, depending on jurisdiction) one thing you have to admire about the Americans is their immutable legal right to free speech. Doesn't mean that he wasn't a total cu nt and the world will be a better place without him, though.
|
|
|
afromanGT
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 77K,
Visits: 0
|
ricecrackers wrote:afromanGT wrote:ricecrackers wrote:afromanGT wrote:ricecrackers wrote:celebrating the death of an innocent man how tasteless He founded and actively campaigned for one of the most hated organisations of the 21st century. He's hardly 'innocent'. Don't let the fact that the monster he created excommunicated him soften public opinion of him, he was a horrible man. meh. just a strawman group for the huffington post to wind its readers up about. hardly as important as you make them out to be. he wasnt convicted of anything, therefore innocentthere are far worse people and groups in this world you should be turning your attention to. Hitler wasn't convicted of anything. Therefor innocent. Godwin's law arrived a little early today Your stupidity was first past the post though.
|
|
|
humbert
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 1.6K,
Visits: 0
|
Future generations will take care to note that the act of his passing was accompanied by a great deal of graciousness on Mr. Phelps part; for he has relieved us of his foul presence, and rendered unto the thankful flies, his corpse. May we be forever grateful.
Edited by humbert: 17/3/2014 09:32:02 PM
|
|
|
433
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 6.7K,
Visits: 0
|
RIP in piece worlds greatest troll afromanGT wrote:ricecrackers wrote:afromanGT wrote:ricecrackers wrote:afromanGT wrote:ricecrackers wrote:celebrating the death of an innocent man how tasteless He founded and actively campaigned for one of the most hated organisations of the 21st century. He's hardly 'innocent'. Don't let the fact that the monster he created excommunicated him soften public opinion of him, he was a horrible man. meh. just a strawman group for the huffington post to wind its readers up about. hardly as important as you make them out to be. he wasnt convicted of anything, therefore innocentthere are far worse people and groups in this world you should be turning your attention to. Hitler wasn't convicted of anything. Therefor innocent. Godwin's law arrived a little early today Your stupidity was first past the post though. Not really, Fred Phelps has never committed a crime. Just because he you ideologically oppose him doesn't mean his death should be celebrated.
|
|
|
rusty
|
|
Group: Banned Members
Posts: 6.1K,
Visits: 0
|
I wouldn't celebrate his death but clearly he's a massive cvnt and hopefully he'll experience a lot of pain. I don't agree with picketing his funeral as his loyal band of brainwashed supporters clearly get off from all the attention. Best just let the bitter old cvnt be forgotten.
|
|
|
marconi101
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 16K,
Visits: 0
|
I'll celebrate his death. There's no God to smite me and no karma to bite me
He was a man of specific quirks. He believed that all meals should be earned through physical effort. He also contended, zealously like a drunk with a political point, that the third dimension would not be possible if it werent for the existence of water.
|
|
|
paladisious
|
|
Group: Moderators
Posts: 39K,
Visits: 0
|
433 wrote:Not really, Fred Phelps has never committed a crime. Just because he you ideologically oppose him doesn't mean his death should be celebrated. I admire your resolve in not celebrating his departure, but to be fair if he did what he did in Australia he most certainly would have been found guilty many times for harassment and public nuisance, to name two laws off the top of my layman's head. Having said that a robust respect for freedom of speech is the most important and admirable thing, but then again we should ask Mr Snowden how that's working out for him right now.
|
|
|
rusty
|
|
Group: Banned Members
Posts: 6.1K,
Visits: 0
|
I don't think Mr Snowden was exercising his free speech, or what he did had anything to do with free speech.
|
|
|
melbourneboys
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 810,
Visits: 0
|
rusty wrote:I don't think Mr Snowden was exercising his free speech, or what he did had anything to do with free speech. You aren't seriously opposed to Snowden are you?
|
|
|
ricecrackers
|
|
Group: Banned Members
Posts: 3.5K,
Visits: 0
|
melbourneboys wrote:rusty wrote:I don't think Mr Snowden was exercising his free speech, or what he did had anything to do with free speech. You aren't seriously opposed to Snowden are you? why would anyone be opposed to a CIA op doing his job #-o
|
|
|
humbert
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 1.6K,
Visits: 0
|
What's the expression I'm looking for?
Burn, fucker, burn should suffice.
|
|
|
paladisious
|
|
Group: Moderators
Posts: 39K,
Visits: 0
|
ricecrackers wrote:melbourneboys wrote:rusty wrote:I don't think Mr Snowden was exercising his free speech, or what he did had anything to do with free speech. You aren't seriously opposed to Snowden are you? why would anyone be opposed to a CIA op doing his job #-o NSA civilian contractor, who had a moral opposition with his job. History is never made by those who behave. The founders of Snowden's country that he is now exiled from would agree wholeheartedly.
|
|
|
humbert
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 1.6K,
Visits: 0
|
paladisious wrote:ricecrackers wrote:melbourneboys wrote:rusty wrote:I don't think Mr Snowden was exercising his free speech, or what he did had anything to do with free speech. You aren't seriously opposed to Snowden are you? why would anyone be opposed to a CIA op doing his job #-o NSA civilian contractor, who had a moral opposition with his job. History is never made by those who behave. The founders of Snowden's country that he is now exiled from would agree wholeheartedly. Be that as it may, Snowden's actions don't fall under the remit of the 1st amendment.
|
|
|
paladisious
|
|
Group: Moderators
Posts: 39K,
Visits: 0
|
humbert wrote:paladisious wrote:ricecrackers wrote:melbourneboys wrote:rusty wrote:I don't think Mr Snowden was exercising his free speech, or what he did had anything to do with free speech. You aren't seriously opposed to Snowden are you? why would anyone be opposed to a CIA op doing his job #-o NSA civilian contractor, who had a moral opposition with his job. History is never made by those who behave. The founders of Snowden's country that he is now exiled from would agree wholeheartedly. Be that as it may, Snowden's actions don't fall under the remit of the 1st amendment. Perhaps, but I'm talking morals, not law here. Is it right to support your country, even when you believe they are doing wrong, or right to do what's right? What if your country is doing something wrong to your country, what do you do? Just take the salary and stay quiet? Obviously that's what 99% of people did.
|
|
|
ricecrackers
|
|
Group: Banned Members
Posts: 3.5K,
Visits: 0
|
paladisious wrote:ricecrackers wrote:melbourneboys wrote:rusty wrote:I don't think Mr Snowden was exercising his free speech, or what he did had anything to do with free speech. You aren't seriously opposed to Snowden are you? why would anyone be opposed to a CIA op doing his job #-o NSA civilian contractor, who had a moral opposition with his job. History is never made by those who behave. The founders of Snowden's country that he is now exiled from would agree wholeheartedly. Snowden didnt work for the NSA, he worked for Dell he's always been CIA...there's no such thing as a former employee. you're with them for life.
|
|
|