afromanGT
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 77K,
Visits: 0
|
SocaWho wrote:afromanGT wrote:SocaWho wrote:Why do most people think Bono is a douchebag? If you go on and on about how people should give more money to the poor and starving and then get on your private jet to fly back to your lavish mansion, you're a wanker. I don't have a problem with celebs doing charity work, only except when you see it doing it in front of a camera to get on their high horse and make others feel guilty since they don't contribute. I think you would find a lot of wealthy people donate but don't tell anyone, but I don't think it should be anyone's business to tell you what you have to do with your money....I mean some people find it hard getting by as it is, so just because they don't donate it doesn't make them uncharitable as such. Yeah, but we're talking about a guy who complains about the profligacy with which society lives. How wasteful we are and how people are starving but he's so opulent he's purchased his own jet plane, because y'know, feeding the poor with that $100m is totally not worth it.
|
|
|
|
Condemned666
|
|
Group: Banned Members
Posts: 3.4K,
Visits: 0
|
In terms of pop rock in the 90s, these guys had it downpacked!
[youtube]DJJwjE2TG6Q[/youtube]
[youtube]-a9w3ue9_fo[/youtube]
[youtube]Z6vOKQFzmgc[/youtube]
[youtube]ycvJHQUqU1M[/youtube]
What about these guys eh? [youtube]pMfV0sVQ_VU[/youtube]
[youtube]iTKJ_itifQg[/youtube]
[youtube]cGvZyrhObrg[/youtube]
|
|
|
Condemned666
|
|
Group: Banned Members
Posts: 3.4K,
Visits: 0
|
Munrubenmuz wrote:SocaWho wrote:Why do most people think Bono is a douchebag? Those idiot sunglasses for one. [size=1]better than botox though for men[/size]  Notice, how ageless us men look when we put on a pair of shades
|
|
|
Muz
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 15K,
Visits: 0
|
SocaWho wrote:Why do most people think Bono is a douchebag? Those idiot sunglasses for one.
Member since 2008.
|
|
|
SocaWho
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 9.3K,
Visits: 0
|
Eastern Glory wrote:afromanGT wrote:batfink wrote:afromanGT wrote:SocaWho wrote:Why do most people think Bono is a douchebag? If you go on and on about how people should give more money to the poor and starving and then get on your private jet to fly back to your lavish mansion, you're a wanker. don't know if that necessarily makes him a wanker......he gives a lot of time to charity and does a lot of charity work...... he is just a wanker...... no real reason other than BEING one Imagine if he used the money he spent on his private plane to solve world hunger... I don't buy that... CEOs of charities don't live on the streets in order to give everything to the people they are trying to help. Generosity is really up to the individual. I agree its up to the individual. But if you talk up the charity theme then you should back it up with action.
|
|
|
SocaWho
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 9.3K,
Visits: 0
|
notorganic wrote:batfink wrote:afromanGT wrote:SocaWho wrote:Why do most people think Bono is a douchebag? If you go on and on about how people should give more money to the poor and starving and then get on your private jet to fly back to your lavish mansion, you're a wanker. don't know if that necessarily makes him a wanker......he gives a lot of time to charity and does a lot of charity work...... he is just a wanker...... no real reason other than BEING one I read somewhere that his multi-million dollar charities never actually provided any money towards alleviating poverty & third-world debt, which was defended as being only for "awareness". Whether that was him, or if he was just the convenient face of the charity, but not a good look. Bill Gates on the other hand has donated tons of money to charity, so his is working quite well.
|
|
|
SocaWho
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 9.3K,
Visits: 0
|
afromanGT wrote:SocaWho wrote:Why do most people think Bono is a douchebag? If you go on and on about how people should give more money to the poor and starving and then get on your private jet to fly back to your lavish mansion, you're a wanker. I don't have a problem with celebs doing charity work, only except when you see it doing it in front of a camera to get on their high horse and make others feel guilty since they don't contribute. I think you would find a lot of wealthy people donate but don't tell anyone, but I don't think it should be anyone's business to tell you what you have to do with your money....I mean some people find it hard getting by as it is, so just because they don't donate it doesn't make them uncharitable as such.
|
|
|
afromanGT
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 77K,
Visits: 0
|
Case closed. Bono is a douche.
|
|
|
Joffa
|
|
Group: Moderators
Posts: 66K,
Visits: 0
|
|
|
|
notorganic
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 21K,
Visits: 0
|
batfink wrote:afromanGT wrote:SocaWho wrote:Why do most people think Bono is a douchebag? If you go on and on about how people should give more money to the poor and starving and then get on your private jet to fly back to your lavish mansion, you're a wanker. don't know if that necessarily makes him a wanker......he gives a lot of time to charity and does a lot of charity work...... he is just a wanker...... no real reason other than BEING one I read somewhere that his multi-million dollar charities never actually provided any money towards alleviating poverty & third-world debt, which was defended as being only for "awareness". Whether that was him, or if he was just the convenient face of the charity, but not a good look.
|
|
|
afromanGT
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 77K,
Visits: 0
|
Eastern Glory wrote:afromanGT wrote:batfink wrote:afromanGT wrote:SocaWho wrote:Why do most people think Bono is a douchebag? If you go on and on about how people should give more money to the poor and starving and then get on your private jet to fly back to your lavish mansion, you're a wanker. don't know if that necessarily makes him a wanker......he gives a lot of time to charity and does a lot of charity work...... he is just a wanker...... no real reason other than BEING one Imagine if he used the money he spent on his private plane to solve world hunger... I don't buy that... CEOs of charities don't live on the streets in order to give everything to the people they are trying to help. Generosity is really up to the individual. He's hardly "living on the streets" if he doesn't buy a fucking private jet. The bloke is worth over $800m Edited by afromanGT: 6/6/2014 09:21:33 PM
|
|
|
Eastern Glory
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 20K,
Visits: 0
|
afromanGT wrote:batfink wrote:afromanGT wrote:SocaWho wrote:Why do most people think Bono is a douchebag? If you go on and on about how people should give more money to the poor and starving and then get on your private jet to fly back to your lavish mansion, you're a wanker. don't know if that necessarily makes him a wanker......he gives a lot of time to charity and does a lot of charity work...... he is just a wanker...... no real reason other than BEING one Imagine if he used the money he spent on his private plane to solve world hunger... I don't buy that... CEOs of charities don't live on the streets in order to give everything to the people they are trying to help. Generosity is really up to the individual.
|
|
|
Condemned666
|
|
Group: Banned Members
Posts: 3.4K,
Visits: 0
|
batfink wrote:notorganic wrote:Bono is my third or fourth cousin. True story. ahh so that's why you're a twat...!!! ;) ;) ;) ;) It would be nicer if you were related to Damien Rice or Chris O'Dowd instead
|
|
|
thupercoach
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 8.3K,
Visits: 0
|
Aljay wrote:Condemned666 wrote:An interesting thought
The Rolling Stones music has dated far better than U2's music
Case in Point: U2's 360 DVD, U2 looked old and tired, the band themselves looked like the dads of "Bono and the boys" trying to sing karaoke versions of their old songs, which is proof U2's music has always leaned towards a younger more energetic audience, whereas the Stones have always had a timeless quality about their music? 60's music requires less energy and less emotion, making it easier to play in your old age. Either that or the Stones have been geriatric for so long that everyone forgets what they were originally like. Noone listens to the Stones except those who got into them in the 60s & 70s. U2 have fans from 3 decades, not 2 and are migh still not be done yet. Edited by Aljay: 4/6/2014 09:19:10 PM Wouldnt agree with that, I only really discovered the Stones in the late '80s and still listen to them, whereas U2 came and went for me without much impact. Each to their own.
|
|
|
rocknerd
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 5.6K,
Visits: 0
|
afromanGT wrote:SocaWho wrote:Why do most people think Bono is a douchebag? If you go on and on about how people should give more money to the poor and starving and then get on your private jet to fly back to your lavish mansion, you're a wanker. If you move all of your money out of Ireland because they will no longer allow you to live their Tax free you're a wanker
|
|
|
afromanGT
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 77K,
Visits: 0
|
batfink wrote:afromanGT wrote:SocaWho wrote:Why do most people think Bono is a douchebag? If you go on and on about how people should give more money to the poor and starving and then get on your private jet to fly back to your lavish mansion, you're a wanker. don't know if that necessarily makes him a wanker......he gives a lot of time to charity and does a lot of charity work...... he is just a wanker...... no real reason other than BEING one Imagine if he used the money he spent on his private plane to solve world hunger...
|
|
|
batfink
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 9.9K,
Visits: 0
|
afromanGT wrote:SocaWho wrote:Why do most people think Bono is a douchebag? If you go on and on about how people should give more money to the poor and starving and then get on your private jet to fly back to your lavish mansion, you're a wanker. don't know if that necessarily makes him a wanker......he gives a lot of time to charity and does a lot of charity work...... he is just a wanker...... no real reason other than BEING one
|
|
|
afromanGT
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 77K,
Visits: 0
|
SocaWho wrote:Why do most people think Bono is a douchebag? If you go on and on about how people should give more money to the poor and starving and then get on your private jet to fly back to your lavish mansion, you're a wanker.
|
|
|
Joffa
|
|
Group: Moderators
Posts: 66K,
Visits: 0
|
batfink wrote:60's & 70's best by a country mile No doubt
|
|
|
batfink
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 9.9K,
Visits: 0
|
60's & 70's best by a country mile
|
|
|
batfink
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 9.9K,
Visits: 0
|
notorganic wrote:Bono is my third or fourth cousin. True story. ahh so that's why you're a twat...!!! ;) ;) ;) ;)
|
|
|
notorganic
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 21K,
Visits: 0
|
Bono is my third or fourth cousin. True story.
|
|
|
SocaWho
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 9.3K,
Visits: 0
|
Why do most people think Bono is a douchebag?
|
|
|
Condemned666
|
|
Group: Banned Members
Posts: 3.4K,
Visits: 0
|
Joffa wrote:This is still U2's best and has held up well in my opinion. [youtube]hTnLsmNiugY[/youtube] [youtube]9dz4UYZIQps[/youtube] [youtube]i-T_nDCTr9I[/youtube] [youtube]fXhY4kMor2A[/youtube] [youtube]irHbORP3or0[/youtube] And for the more rock oriented U2 I always preferred this-> [youtube]0S8FEp-DDv8[/youtube]
|
|
|
Joffa
|
|
Group: Moderators
Posts: 66K,
Visits: 0
|
The last great song written and released by the rolling stones from 1981
[youtube]MKLVmBOOqVU[/youtube]
|
|
|
Joffa
|
|
Group: Moderators
Posts: 66K,
Visits: 0
|
This is still U2's best and has held up well in my opinion.
[youtube]LHcP4MWABGY[/youtube]
|
|
|
Condemned666
|
|
Group: Banned Members
Posts: 3.4K,
Visits: 0
|
U2's music is the equivalent of Mcdonalds and Coca Cola, which is easily appealing to a lot of people who are clueless about music
However, unlike that Mcdonalds' Quarter Pounder with Cheese that was left in a jacket pocket for years and that had not decomposed, U2 themselves are not immune from age and degradation, U2 relied too much on Bono's powerful voice to back up Edge's Guitar, and Bono cant hit a note anymore!
|
|
|
SocaWho
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 9.3K,
Visits: 0
|
sydneyfc1987 wrote:Aljay wrote: Noone listens to the Stones except those who got into them in the 60s & 70s. U2 have fans from 3 decades, not 2 and are migh still not be done yet.
Edited by Aljay: 4/6/2014 09:19:10 PM
Umm, no… Just no.. I listen to the Stones and Im an 80s born.
|
|
|
Glenn - A-league Mad
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 5.2K,
Visits: 0
|
rocknerd wrote:afromanGT wrote:Aljay wrote:Condemned666 wrote:An interesting thought
The Rolling Stones music has dated far better than U2's music
Case in Point: U2's 360 DVD, U2 looked old and tired, the band themselves looked like the dads of "Bono and the boys" trying to sing karaoke versions of their old songs, which is proof U2's music has always leaned towards a younger more energetic audience, whereas the Stones have always had a timeless quality about their music? 60's music requires less energy and less emotion, making it easier to play in your old age. Either that or the Stones have been geriatric for so long that everyone forgets what they were originally like. Noone listens to the Stones except those who got into them in the 60s & 70s. U2 have fans from 3 decades, not 2 and are migh still not be done yet. Edited by Aljay: 4/6/2014 09:19:10 PM I'm a Rolling Stones fan. I was born in the 80's. Beggars Banquet is one of my favourite albums. And given that the Stones have released an album in every decade since the 60's I think you're well off the mark there. And even if you were close to being right (which you aren't) Bono is a massive fucking cockhead so you're still wrong. :lol: This, Though I wouldn't bother with a Stones record after 1974. they had a few god songs but overall nothing Compares to the Stones with Brian Jones. +1 Bono being a massive cock head +10000000000000000000000000000000
|
|
|
rocknerd
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 5.6K,
Visits: 0
|
afromanGT wrote:Aljay wrote:Condemned666 wrote:An interesting thought
The Rolling Stones music has dated far better than U2's music
Case in Point: U2's 360 DVD, U2 looked old and tired, the band themselves looked like the dads of "Bono and the boys" trying to sing karaoke versions of their old songs, which is proof U2's music has always leaned towards a younger more energetic audience, whereas the Stones have always had a timeless quality about their music? 60's music requires less energy and less emotion, making it easier to play in your old age. Either that or the Stones have been geriatric for so long that everyone forgets what they were originally like. Noone listens to the Stones except those who got into them in the 60s & 70s. U2 have fans from 3 decades, not 2 and are migh still not be done yet. Edited by Aljay: 4/6/2014 09:19:10 PM I'm a Rolling Stones fan. I was born in the 80's. Beggars Banquet is one of my favourite albums. And given that the Stones have released an album in every decade since the 60's I think you're well off the mark there. And even if you were close to being right (which you aren't) Bono is a massive fucking cockhead so you're still wrong. :lol: This, Though I wouldn't bother with a Stones record after 1974. they had a few god songs but overall nothing Compares to the Stones with Brian Jones.
|
|
|