Fuck off

Are you so naive to think that the government will snap their fingers and all guns will simply disappear? No, what will happen is that law abiding citizens will hand in their guns, and only criminals will be left with weapons. But I guess logic would be a bit too much when you're main source of news is comedic satire from the unbiased messiah that is John Oliver.

No I got family in America and lost an uncle to gun violence over there . But you know more than me

And the police....

under what circumstances?

again, then why not take the guns away from the police
you side stepped this question earlier

The police arrive in minutes, but the crime is over in seconds.

ultimately most here's opinions arent even opinions
they merely regurgitate or parrot talking points they hear from the television or read in their favourite rubbishy tabloid

its quite obvious because i see the same comments everywhere

And your opinion is simply the opposite of what the majority say regardless of whether or not the majority are correct.

You would argue that 1+1 doesnt equal 2 because thats what everyone is saying.

Ricecrackers and myself share the same view on guns that the majority of Americans hold.

I have guns because they are fun to shoot and I enjoy the sport of shooting 8-[ o:)

-PB

ridiculous argument
a better metaphor is you'd believe 1+1 does not equal 2 if the majority inside your echo chamber told you that regardless of proof

Ridiculous argument
A better metaphor is HUR DER DURRERRR DDERRR

So should Australia relax its gun laws ?

there's been no evidence they'd make a shred of difference to shooting homicides

Whats the real issue then? or are you happy to see Innocent school kids getting blown to pieces ?

I havent seen any innocent school kids getting blown to pieces
have you?

In America

you saw it did you?
you saw more than anyone else in the world

No i just generally ignore your posts because you're annoying :)

Why wouldn't you want police to have guns when common people don't? Are you stupid?

I knew you would say that, you're getting very predictable

You don't believe Sandy Hook happened do you,

you make a lot of assumptions

Well what else was your comment meant to mean?

it means I didnt see any "innocent school kids getting blown to pieces"
wanna tell me what else I believe?

So you missed the whole Sandy Hook deal-e-o?

Because apparently guns don't make it safer...

:roll: oh so you're going to pretend to be stupid. This is a waste of time.

Dodging the question :lol:

Has anyone ever really said to just "take the guns away" in America?

I don't think so.

They just need a re-form on the gun laws/control.

As for why should Police have guns when the commoner does not?

Simple, because there will always be a very small percentage of criminals that will still be able to source them and for that reason you would expect the law enforcement to also have them.

Do Police need APC's and other Military grade assets? No.

-PB

America should just start more wars so that gun enthusiasts can get their rocks off, police won't have access to military surplus and everyone will hail president Hilary Clinton

The argument that criminals are still going to get guns so why have laws against them is fatuous.

In that case why have any laws? Someone will always not pay attention to them. You could make the same argument against any law.